English / French

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English / French World Heritage 42 COM WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add Paris, 28 May 2018 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Forty-second session Manama, Bahrain 24 June - 4 July 2018 Item 7B of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List SUMMARY This document contains information on the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. The World Heritage Committee is requested to review the reports on the state of conservation of properties contained in this document. The full reports of Reactive Monitoring missions requested by the World Heritage Committee are available at the following Web address in their original language: http://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/42COM/documents All previous state of conservation reports are available through the World Heritage State of conservation Information System at the following Web address: http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc Decision required: The World Heritage Committee may wish to adopt the draft Decision presented at the end of each state of conservation report. Table of content I. REPORTS ON THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST ....................................................................................................................... 4 CULTURAL PROPERTIES ..................................................................................................................... 4 ASIA-PACIFIC ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Ancient Building Complex in the Wudang Mountains (China) (C 705) .................................... 4 2. Historic Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa (China) (C 707ter) ......................................... 7 5. Silk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang’an – Tian-shan Corridor (China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan) (C 1442) ............................................................................................................. 10 10. Sites of Japan’s Meiji Industrial Revolution: Iron and Steel, Shipbuilding and Coal Mining (Japan) (C 1484) .................................................................................................................... 14 14. Fort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore (Pakistan) (C 171) .................................................... 14 15. Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras (Philippines) (C 722) .......................................... 14 17. Old Town of Galle and its Fortifications (Sri Lanka) (C 451) .................................................. 16 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA .................................................................................................... 20 21. Historic Centre of Prague (Czechia) (C 616bis) .................................................................... 20 24. Historical Monuments of Mtskheta (Georgia) (C 708bis) ....................................................... 23 26. Natural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor (Montenegro) (C 125ter) .............................. 26 28. Kizhi Pogost (Russian Federation) (C 544) ........................................................................... 29 29. Cultural and Historic Ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands (Russian Federation) .................. 32 31. Historic Areas of Istanbul (Turkey) (C 356bis) ....................................................................... 32 32. Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (C 373bis) ................................................................................................................. 35 AFRICA .............................................................................................................................................. 39 45. Lamu Old Town (Kenya) (C 1055) ......................................................................................... 39 47. Island of Mozambique (Mozambique) (C 599) ....................................................................... 42 48. Sukur Cultural Landscape (Nigeria) (C 938) .......................................................................... 46 ARAB STATES .................................................................................................................................. 47 52. Memphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur (Egypt) (C 86) ...... 47 54. Petra (Jordan) (C 326) ........................................................................................................... 50 55. Um er-Rasas (Kastrom Mefa’a) (Jordan) (C 1093) ................................................................ 54 56. Byblos (Lebanon) (C 295) ...................................................................................................... 56 60. Archaeological Site of Carthage (Tunisia) (C 37) .................................................................. 59 MIXED PROPERTIES ........................................................................................................................... 62 ARAB STATES .................................................................................................................................. 62 66. The Ahwar of Southern Iraq: Refuge of Biodiversity and the Relict Landscape of the Mesopotamian Cities (Iraq) (C/N 1481) ................................................................................. 62 NATURAL PROPERTIES ..................................................................................................................... 67 ASIA-PACIFIC ................................................................................................................................... 67 69. Western Tien Shan (Kazakhstan, Kirgizstan, Uzbekistan) (N 1490) ..................................... 67 State of conservation of properties WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add, p. 2 Inscribed on the World Heritage List 70. Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal) (N 120) ........................................................................... 70 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA .................................................................................................... 74 72. Pirin National Park (Bulgaria) (N 225bis) ............................................................................... 74 80. Western Caucasus (Russian Federation) (N 900) ................................................................. 77 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ........................................................................................ 81 86. Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California (Mexico) (N 1182ter) .......................... 81 AFRICA .............................................................................................................................................. 86 93. Lake Malawi National Park (Malawi) (N 289) ......................................................................... 86 ARAB STATES .................................................................................................................................. 89 100. Socotra Archipelago (Yemen) (N 1263) ................................................................................. 89 II. OMNIBUS .................................................................................................................................... 90 CULTURAL PROPERTIES ................................................................................................................... 90 ASIA-PACIFIC ................................................................................................................................... 90 The Grand Canal (China) (C 1443bis) ........................................................................................... 90 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA .................................................................................................... 91 Carolingian Westwork and Civitas Corvey (Germany) (C 1447) ................................................... 91 Historic Centre of the City of Yaroslavl (Russian Federation) (C 1170)......................................... 92 State of conservation of properties WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add, p. 3 Inscribed on the World Heritage List I. REPORTS ON THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF PROPERTIES INSCRIBED ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST CULTURAL PROPERTIES ASIA-PACIFIC 1. Ancient Building Complex in the Wudang Mountains (China) (C 705) Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 1994 Criteria (i)(ii)(vi) Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger N/A Previous Committee Decisions see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/705/documents/ International Assistance Requests approved: 0 Total amount approved: USD 0 For details, see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/705/assistance/ UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds N/A Previous monitoring missions March 2014: Joint World Heritage Center/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports Management activities (Project to raise up the Yuzhen Palace at the property) Management systems / Management Plan (Requirement for a living heritage management approach) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation (Tourism development has begun to reach a critical mass) Illustrative material see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/705/ Current conservation issues On 29 November 2017, the State Party submitted a report
Recommended publications
  • A303 PI Inspector's Report
    Report to the First Secretary of The Planning State and the Secretary of State for Inspectorate 4/09 Kite Wing Transport Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay By Michael Ellison MA (Oxon) Bristol BS1 6PN 0117 372 6372 An Inspector appointed by the First Secretary Date: 31 January of State and the Secretary of State for 2005 Transport Assisted by Clive Cochrane Dip Arch, Reg Arch, MSc, MRTPI HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SLIP ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) (DETRUNKING) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SIDE ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER (NO. ) 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (COUNTESS ROUNDABOUT TO LONGBARROW CROSSROADS) (PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS) ORDER 200 AND THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (STONEHENGE BYWAY) (PROHIBITION OF MOTOR VEHICLES) ORDER 200 Dates of Inquiry: 17 February 2004 to 11 May 2004 Ref: HA61/4/3 REPORT TO THE FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT FILE REF: HA61/4/3 CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number Case Details 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Description of the site and its surroundings 7 3 Procedural Submission 12 4 The case of the Highways Agency 14 Background and history of the scheme 14 The need for the scheme 17 Traffic forecasts 20 The scheme proposals 21 Design standards 26
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury Plain SAC Conservation Objectives Supplementary Advice
    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary Advice on Conserving and Restoring Site Features Salisbury Plain Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site code: UK0012683 Date of Publication: 20 February 2017 Page 1 of 30 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to Salisbury Plain SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives which are available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England, when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site. This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request. Where evidence and references have not been indicated, Natural England has applied ecological knowledge and expert judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Reading Dynamics of the City of Istanbul Through Critical Mapping
    Gazi University Journal of Science GU J Sci 29(2):403-412 (2016) Re-Reading Dynamics of The City of Istanbul Through Critical Mapping Demet MUTMAN1, 1 Maltepe University, Faculty of Architecture and Design, 34857 Maltepe Istanbul, Turkey Received: 18/04/2016 Revised:21/04/2016 Accepted: 26/04/2016 ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to re-read and define differentiating layers of the city of Istanbul through critical mappings as an interrogative socio-spatial research. Through this form of a new city read, information on daily urban and social practices, global impacts and urban and economic effects of consumption over space would be exposed among five different thematic constellations rooted from Guy Debord's The Society of the Spectacle. The author aims to clarify socio-spatial constellations over space, time and current trends by deconstructing the current city formation of Istanbul. Key words: Critical mapping, Istanbul, socio-spatial research 1. INTRODUCTION Maps have been used to represent the urban environment as only geographical conditions, but a hidden socio-political well as the representational structure of a city from information as a tool of a hegemonic strategy. geographical maps and measurements of ancient Babylon, Syria and Palestine, to the topographical representations Through this article maps as strategic tools of the ideology and cadastral maps that were developed by Egyptians. will therefore be used as a potential to criticize a social and Romans developed city maps similar to today’s structure spatial environment by using the potential of its where the detailed construction plans for engineers and the representational techniques however reversing its formation of current city plans were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Istanbul Valiliği Il Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü
    T.C. İSTANBUL VALİLİĞİ İL MİLLİ EĞİTİM MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ MÜNHAL KURUMLAR LİSTESİ SIRA NO KURUM ADI 1 ADALAR-(726255)Büyükada Şehit Murat Yüksel İlkokulu(B) 2 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727038)Tayakadın Ortaokulu(B) 3 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727245)Mimar Sinan İlkokulu(B) 4 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727250)Köroğlu Ortaokulu(A) 5 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727258)Hasan Tahsin İlkokulu(A) 6 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727263)Hadımköy Örfi Çetinkaya Ortaokulu(A) 7 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727267)Deliklikaya Ortaokulu(B) 8 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727272)Boyalık Örfi Çetinkaya Ortaokulu(B) 9 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727279)Arnavutköy İlkokulu(A) 10 ARNAVUTKÖY-(727367)TOKİ Taşoluk Ortaokulu(C) 11 ARNAVUTKÖY-(731856)Osman Gazi Ortaokulu(A) 12 ARNAVUTKÖY-(735401)Arnavutköy Cumhuriyet Ortaokulu(A) 13 ARNAVUTKÖY-(735402)Şehit Er Tuncay Türken Ortaokulu(A) 14 ARNAVUTKÖY-(748356)Arnavutköy Şehit Çavuş Selçuk Gürdal Yatılı Bölge Ortaokulu(A) 15 ARNAVUTKÖY-(749735)Suatlar Anaokulu(B) 16 ARNAVUTKÖY-(750417)Şehit Onbaşı Murat Şengöz İmam Hatip Ortaokulu(C) 17 ARNAVUTKÖY-(758908)Akşemsettin İmam Hatip Ortaokulu() 18 ARNAVUTKÖY-(758912)Necip Fazıl Kısakürek İmam Hatip Ortaokulu() 19 ARNAVUTKÖY-(759455)Necip Fazıl Kısakürek Anadolu İmam Hatip Lisesi() 20 ARNAVUTKÖY-(967504)Örfi Çetinkaya Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lisesi(A) 21 ARNAVUTKÖY-(972269)Arnavutköy Rehberlik ve Araştırma Merkezi(B) 22 ARNAVUTKÖY-(974966)Hadımköy TOKİ Anadolu İmam Hatip Lisesi(A) Sayfa 1 / 13 SIRA NO KURUM ADI 23 ATAŞEHİR-(727284)Kayışdağı Arif Paşa İlkokulu(A) 24 ATAŞEHİR-(727372)Şehit Öğretmen Mehmet Fidan Ortaokulu(A) 25 ATAŞEHİR-(727380)Sosyal Meskenler Ortaokulu(A) 26 ATAŞEHİR-(733791)Rabia
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
    World Heritage 41 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 27 June / 27 juin 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-first session / Quarante-et-unième session Krakow, Poland / Cracovie, Pologne 2-12 July 2017 / 2-12 juillet 2017 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (373bis) Stonehenge, Avebury et sites associés (Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (373bis) 31 January – 3 February 2017 Report on the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated sites 31 January – 3 February 2017 Table of contents Executive Summary 1. Introductory Statements 1.1 Acknowledgments 1.2. Aims and mandate of the February 2017 Mission 2. Context and background 2.1 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) 2.2 Summary 1st Mission recommendations (October 2015 – report April 2016). 2.3 Reactions by the civil society 2.4 Governance and consensus building among heritage bodies 3. Responses by the SP to the recommendations of the first Mission - April 2016 3.1 Willingness to respond 3.2 Issues of archaeological organisation and quality control 3.3 Issue of visitor numbers and behaviour 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Sira No Adi Soyadi Unvani Önceki Çaliştiği Ilçe Önceki
    129. EK TERCİH VE YERLEŞTİRME İŞLEMLERİNDE YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ YAPAN VE AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ HİZMET SÖZLEŞMESİ İMZALAYAN HEKİM LİSTESİ ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞTIĞI SIRA YERLEŞTİĞİ AİLE GÖREVE ADI SOYADI UNVANI ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞTIĞI İLÇE ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞTIĞI AİLE SAĞLIĞI MERKEZİ AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ YENİ YERLEŞTİĞİ İLÇE YENİ YERLEŞTİĞİ AİLE SAĞLIĞI MERKEZİ BAŞVURU ŞEKLİ NO HEKİMLİĞİ BİRİMİ BAŞLAYIŞ TARİHİ BİRİMİ 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 1 HAKAN SARIKAYA AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ UZMANI BEYLİKDÜZÜ Kavaklı 2 Nolu ASM 34.12.024 AVCILAR Bizimevler ASM 34.04.100 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 2 MEHMET BAYKAL AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ UZMANI BAĞCILAR Bağcılar 8 Nolu ASM 34.05.056 BAHÇELİEVLER Bahçelievler 5 Nolu ASM 34.06.095 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 3 ELVAN ANIL AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ UZMANI ŞİŞLİ Şişli 15 Nolu ASM 34.35.098 BEŞİKTAŞ Beşiktaş 1 Nolu ASM 34.10.020 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 4 MARIANNA MART PRATİSYEN ARNAVUTKÖY İmrahor ASM 34.02.082 ARNAVUTKÖY İmrahor ASM 34.02.030 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 5 SULTAN BAYSAL PRATİSYEN KADIKÖY Kadıköy 4 Nolu ASM 34.23.026 ATAŞEHİR Fetih Öz Çiftçi ASM 34.03.003 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 6 SALOMON FİDELY JARNE PRATİSYEN KADIKÖY Kadıköy 13 Nolu ASM 34.23.152 ATAŞEHİR Küçükbakkalköy ASM 34.03.044 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 7 HATİCE ARSLAN PRATİSYEN SANCAKTEPE Sancaktepe 28 Nolu ASM 34.29.132 ATAŞEHİR Küçükbakkalköy ASM 34.03.046 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 8 RUKEN AYDIN PRATİSYEN ÜMRANİYE Ümraniye 30 Nolu ASM 34.37.194 ATAŞEHİR Ataşehir ASM 34.03.062 01.07.2021 YER DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ 9 MUHAMMED MARAŞLI PRATİSYEN AVCILAR Yeşilkent 2 Nolu ASM 34.04.139 AVCILAR Yeşilkent 2
    [Show full text]
  • Clientelism and Dominance: Evidence from Turkey
    Clientelism and Dominance: Evidence from Turkey Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln 2019 vorgelegt von DÜZGÜN ARSLANTAŞ, M.Sc. aus Tunceli (Türkei) Referent: Prof. Dr. André Kaiser Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Stephan Conermann Tag der Promotion: 09.09.2019 ii To labor, love and peace…. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the completion of this dissertation, many people have undoubtedly played a role. First and foremost is my supervisor, Prof. André Kaiser. I would like to thank him for all the support he has given me during this challenging process. He always encouraged me with his positive and friendly attitude and made me extremely efficient in dealing with the thesis and life. I feel very lucky to have worked under his supervision and hope that we can find common ground to work together in the future as well. Similarly, I would like to thank my second supervisor, Prof. Stephan Conermann, for his constructive views and suggestions. My thanks also go to Prof. Christine Trampusch, who chaired the disputation. This thesis would certainly not be complete without unique institutional support. In this context, I am grateful to the IMPRS-SPCE at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies and to the Cologne Center for Comparative Politics (CCCP) for providing a unique working environment and amazing facilities. My special thanks go to our directors, Prof. Jens Beckert and Prof. Lucio Baccaro, and the faculty member Prof. Martin Höpner, who were always very supportive in the feedback sessions. In addition, I am grateful to our administrative and academic coordinators, Ursula and Gudrun, reception members Christiane and Enke, and all library and editorial team members.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge A303 Improvement: Outline Assessment of the Impacts
    Stonehenge A303 improvement: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MCIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy January 2017 ©Historic England and the National Trust Stonehenge A303 improvements: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Executive Summary Introduction In 2014, English Heritage (now Historic England) and the National Trust commissioned an assessment (Snashall, Young 2014) on the potential impact of new road options, including a tunnel, for the A303 within the Stonehenge component of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage property. Since at that time, there were no detailed proposals, that report considered four possible alternatives and concluded that, of these, an off-line route with a tunnel of 2.9kms length would be the most deliverable solution. The government remains committed to improving the A303 and to funding sufficient for a tunnel of at least 2.9kms length within the World Heritage property. Highways England are consulting in early 2017 on route options developed since 2014 for this road scheme through the World Heritage property and bypassing Winterbourne Stoke village to the west. This report is an outline assessment of these initial options on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the World Heritage property. It has been commissioned to assess the impact of the latest road options in the light of updated archaeological information.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Name Construction Start Actual Construction End
    Construction Construction Construction Project Name Start Actual End Planned End Actual M5 J11a-12 MP 86/9 Geotech 10/01/2013 19/04/2013 21/03/2013 M5 J20-21 VRS MP 155/5 - 159/0 10/01/2013 17/01/2014 17/01/2014 M5 J31 Exminster Drainage 02/09/2011 30/10/2011 30/10/2011 A38 Lee Mill to Voss Farm FS C 01/10/2009 01/04/2011 01/04/2011 A30 SCORRIER-AVERS W/B & E/B C 02/02/2012 01/07/2012 01/03/2012 A30 PLUSHA KENNARDS HSE E/B C 18/09/2012 24/09/2012 25/09/2012 A38 WHISTLEY HILL DRAINAGE C 07/11/2011 24/12/2011 23/12/2011 A47 Guyhirn Bank C NP 19/09/2012 28/09/2012 29/09/2012 A120 Coggeshall Bypass East C 13/11/2012 16/11/2012 16/11/2012 A14 Orwell to Levington C 04/11/2013 11/11/2013 11/11/2013 A14SpittalsI/CResurfacingC NP 02/07/2012 07/08/2013 26/07/2012 A38 Clinnick R/W & White C 11/03/2012 06/07/2012 06/07/2012 A30 Whiddon Down to Woodleigh 01/12/2011 14/02/2012 14/02/2012 A49 KIMBOLTON RETAINING-CapRd 11/02/2013 10/04/2013 30/04/2013 NO3:A404 A308toA4130 SB Appl C 16/07/2012 18/07/2012 21/07/2012 NO3 M4 J6-7 EB Cippenham C 24/09/2012 11/08/2012 16/11/2012 A36 Southington Farm Geotech C 05/09/2011 24/06/2011 21/10/2011 A303 BOSCOMBE DOWN RS C 01/01/2011 30/06/2011 30/06/2011 M5 J18 Avonmouth slip lighti C 01/02/2012 31/03/2012 31/03/2012 A303 South Pethrton St Light C 01/05/2011 30/09/2011 30/09/2011 A303Cartgate RAB St Lighting C 01/01/2012 29/02/2012 29/02/2012 A4 Portway Signals C 01/02/2011 30/09/2011 30/09/2011 M4/M5 Alm.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down
    A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down 8 e m TR010025 u l o V Deadline 4 8.30.6 - Written summaries of oral submissions put at Traffic and Transport hearing on 13th June 2019 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 June 2019 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Development Consent Order 20[**] Written summaries of oral submissions put at Traffic and Transport hearing on 13th June 2019 Regulation Number: Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010025 Reference Application Document Reference 8.30.6 Author: A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 21 June 2019 Deadline 4 Issue A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 3 METHODOLOGY AND MODELLING............................................................... 3 4 PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ............................................................................... 8 5 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC .......................................................................... 22 6 OPERATIONAL TRAFFIC .............................................................................. 23 7 ASSESSMENT OF OTHER SUGGESTED ROUTES .................................... 27 8 ECONOMIC AND BENEFIT COST RATIO ASSESSMENT ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's State of Impunity
    TURKEY’S STATE OF IMPUNITY - 2020 Impunity is the impossibility of investigation, prosecution and penalisation of serious human rights violations, in the literature of Human Rights. Through impunity, a person who commits the crime is, directly or indirectly through legal provisions, exempted from prosecution or is penalised with a much smaller sentence than required. So impunity is not interested in the crime itself, but protects the criminal. This mechanism involves all stages of prosecution, starting from the criminal act itself until the judicial bodies of the government. It is an extremely​ widespread practice in the administration and judiciary. November 2nd was announced by the United Nations as the International Day to End Impunity. The latest “Turkey’s​ State of Impunity”​ bulletin, which we started to publish in 2016, include only a part of the “impunity practices” that reflected in the media between November 2019 - November 2020. The practice of impunity in Turkey, which unfortunately strengthened and ordinarised, weakens the dependence to the state of law and to the principles of fair trial - which were already faulty. Confidence in Turkey’s judiciary continues to lose strength and mechanisms of separation of powers continue to lose importance... Government authorities and pro-government circles avoiding trial Public officers can not be put on trial as suspects or defendants, which corrodes Turkish bureaucracy’s obligation to act in accordance with the principles of the state of law. When citizens express their opinions, the police comes to get them the next morning. However, the opposite can be said for the bureaucracy and pro-government politicians.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Yılı Ana Arter Listesi
    ÖNEMLİ UYARI: İşyerinin veya reklamın bulunduğu yer aşağıdaki listede yer alan anaarterlere cepheli ise beyannamenin İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesine, değilse İlçe Belediyesine verilmesi gerekmektedir. İşyerinin bulunduğu binanın anaartere cephesi varsa, bina üzerindeki tüm reklamların (Sokağa bakan cephedekiler dahil) İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesine beyan edilmesi yasal zorunluluktur. (5216 Sayılı Kanun'un 23/e maddesi) İSTANBUL BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYESİ 2019 YILI ANAARTER LİSTESİ İLÇE ADI GRUP ANAARTER ADI ADALAR 3 Akasya Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Alsancak Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Altınordu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Ayyıldız Cad.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Barbaros Hayrettin Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük İskele Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük Tur Yolu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük Tur Yolu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Cami Sk.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Çankaya Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Meydanı(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Gezinti Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Gönüllü Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Gülistan Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 İskele Meydanı(Büyükada)(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Kınalı Çarşı Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Lozan Zaferi Sk.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Malül Gazi Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Nizam Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Refah Şehitleri Cad.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Şehit Recep Koç Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Şehit Recep Koç Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Yalı Cad.(BURGAZADA
    [Show full text]