DOCSLIB.ORG

Antitrust Litigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2 4 e i 8 CPD HOURS xp n One-Day Conference, 7th May 2008 th e te Solicitors Regulation e r r Thistle Marble Arch, London, W1 t n k s a Authority Accreditation e d tio y is n i c a s u l su s e s Antitrust Litigation - s EC White Paper Analysis Featured speaker: Debating the future of antitrust Eddy De Smijter litigation in the UK and Europe European Commission DG Competition www.thelawyerconferences.com Plus, competition and litigation lawyers from the UK, US and Europe’s leading firms, in-house counsel and regulators: In-depth analysis and advice from the leading international antitrust litigation experts, both Brick Court Chambers from private practice and in-house OFT Mayer Brown The definitive debate and discussion forum on Cohen Milstein the EC White Paper in one action-packed day Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Blackstone Chambers A new format with six moderated interactive Norton Rose panel discussions focusing on the key Microsoft Brussels outcomes of the White Paper Harbour Litigation Funding Limited Irwin Mitchell Herbert Smith LLP The ideal networking forum for antitrust litigators, in-house counsel, and antitrust regulators Clifford Chance Clyde and Co Latham and Watkins Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP Hengeler Mueller BT Group Akzo Nobel Howrey Hogan and Hartson Linklaters Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Edwin Coe Constantine Cannon +44 (0) 20 7970 4770 [email protected] • www.thelawyerconferences.com Interactive panel discussions focusing on the key outcomes of the White Paper Conference, 7th May 2008 • Which method should be used for calculating the quantum of damages? 08.20 Registration & morning coffee • Double and treble damages? 08.50 Chairperson’s welcome • Indirect purchasers and the passing–on defence Nicholas Green Jon Lawrence QC Partner, Head of Competition Litigation Team Brick Court Chambers Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 11.15 Networking & coffee break 09.00 Panel Discussion - Overview of the paper • Overview of the White Paper 11.35 Panel Discussion - Access to evidence • High level summary of principal recommendations • Follow-on actions and the binding nature of regulatory decisions Moderated by: • Will UK-style discovery be available? Elizabeth Moroney • What should be the burden of proof in private antitrust actions? Partner • Access to documents from the regulator and protection of Clifford Chance business secrets/leniency applications Panellists: • Preservation of evidence Eddy De Smijter Moderated by: European Commission, DG Competition Stephen Wisking Ali Nikpay Partner, EU Competition Senior Director Herbert Smith LLP OFT Panellists: Andres Galarza Donald Klawiter Partner Partner, Antitrust and Competition Practice Mayer Brown – Brussels Mayer Brown – Washington DC Carel Maske, Director Alan Owens Competition Law EMEA Partner, Litigation and Dispute Resolution Microsoft Brussels Irwin Mitchell Vincent Smith Paolo Palmigiano Competition Partner Head of Competition and Regulatory Law Cohen Milstein BT Group Gordon Schnell Esq. Gordon Schnell Esq. Partner, Antitrust Litigation Partner, Antitrust Litigation Constantine Cannon Constantine Cannon 09.45 Panel Discussion - Collective redress/ Representative 12.30 Managing cross-border cases actions/Individual standing • Which substantive law should be applicable to antitrust Discussion to encompass both the White Paper damages claims? proposals and the European and UK experience of • Top tips on co-ordination across jurisdictions collective/representative actions Thomas de la Mare • How will consumer claims be brought? Barrister • Will the EU encourage/mandate collective redress? Blackstone Chambers • What is the current Member State experience of 13.15 Networking lunch collective redress? Moderated by: 14.00 Panel Discussion - Costs of proceedings – Julian Connerty special rules for competition claims? Partner • Should special rules be introduced to reduce the cost risk Clyde and Co for the claimant? Panellists: • If so, what kind of rules? Eddy De Smijter Moderated by: European Commission, DG Competition David Green Partner Andres Galarza Edwin Coe Partner Mayer Brown – Brussels Panellists: Susan Dunn Vincent Smith Harbour Litigation Funding Limited Competition Partner Sam Eastwood Cohen Milstein Partner, Dispute Resolution Jochen Burrichter Norton Rose Partner Carel Maske Hengeler Mueller – Düsseldorf Director, Competition Law EMEA Gordon Schnell Esq. Microsoft Brussels Partner, Antitrust Litigation Gordon Schnell Esq. Constantine Cannon Partner, Antitrust Litigation 10.30 Damages & passing-on defence Constantine Cannon • How should damages be defined? +44 (0) 20 7970 4770 • [email protected] • www.thelawyerconferences.com Hear from the leading UK, Europe, and US antitrust and competition law partners, in house counsel and regulatory heads 14.45 Limitation periods and causation • Should limitation periods be suspended? If so, from “Businesses and consumers in Europe have a when onwards? right to damages if they have lost out as a result • Is clarification of the legal requirement of causation of the anti-competitive behaviour of others. necessary to facilitate damages actions? We are presenting options to help ensure that Michael Sanders this right is a reality and not just a theory” Partner Linklaters (Commissioner Neelie Kroes, EC, 2007) Jonas Koponen Partner This timely conference will provide unrivalled Linklaters – Brussels opportunities to gain insight into the key 15.30 Networking & coffee break antitrust litigation issues in the UK and Europe. 16.00 Panel Discussion - Interaction with leniency Hear: • Will private damages, especially exemplary damages claims • The OFT, Mayer Brown, Microsoft Brussels, endanger the effectiveness of the leniency programme? • Non discoverability of leniency application Clifford Chance and Cohen Milstein provide • Possibility to lessen the civil liability of a leniency application a high-level summary of the principal Moderated by: recommendations Tom McQuail • Discussion by Clyde & Co, Mayer Brown, Partner Hengeler Mueller and Cohen Milstein Howrey – Brussels encompassing both the White Paper proposals Panellists: and the European and UK experience of Eddy De Smijter European Commission, DG Competition collective/representative actions Ali Nikpay • Freshfields analyse damages and the passing Senior Director on defence, while Blackstone Chambers OFT examine the issues relating to managing Andres Galarza cross border cases Partner Mayer Brown – Brussels • Herbert Smith, Mayer Brown, Irwin Mitchell Jasper de Gou and the BT Group discuss access to evidence Coordinator Competition Law Akzo Nobel – Netherlands • Edwin Coe, Harbour Litigation Funding, Norton Rose and Microsoft Brussels look Thomas de la Mare Barrister at costs of proceedings Blackstone Chambers • Howrey, OFT, Mayer Brown, Akzo Nobel and Gordon Schnell Esq. Blackstone Chambers focus on interaction Partner, Antitrust Litigation with leniency Constantine Cannon 16.45 Panel Discussion - Buying peace globally – • Limitation periods and causation tackled global co-ordination of investigations and by Linklaters crafting global settlements • OFT, Hogan and Hartson, Mayer Brown, Discussion around experience in co-ordinating global investigations Latham & Watkins, Cleary Gottlieb and and managing global settlements in competition cases Skadden share experiences of buying Moderated by: peace globall John Pheasant Partner Hogan and Hartson Featuring six interactive panel discussions and Panellists: three in-depth analysis sessions , this event Ali Nickay will encourage maximum audience participation. Senior Director OFT Join the debate with those shaping the future of Donald Klawiter antitrust litigation and gain the knowledge to firmly Partner, Antitrust and Competition Practice take your place in this changing environment. Mayer Brown – Washington DC Dr Andreas Weitbrecht Book Now Managing Partner, Brussels Office Call: +44 (0) 20 7970 4770 Latham and Watkins – Brussels Online : www.thelawyerconferences.com Shaun Goodman Partner Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP James S. Venit SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITY We will create a solution that ensures your company’s brand engages the right Partner people at the right time, helping you meet and influence the people who are Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP – Brussels going to ensure the growth of your business now and in the future. To find out more call Michelle Calder on +44 (0) 20 7970 4349 17.30 Close of conference Or email [email protected] +44 (0) 20 7970 4770 • [email protected] • www.thelawyerconferences.com Antitrust Litigation - One-Day Conference, 7th May 2008 Thistle Marble Arch, London, W1 EC White Paper Analysis HOW TO BOOK VENUE INFORMATION ONLINE: at www.thelawyerconferences.com DATE: 7th May 2008 CALL: +44 (0)20 7970 4770 VENUE: Thistle Marble Arch Bryanston Street FAX: completed form to: +44 (0)20 7970 4799 Marble Arch POST: completed form & payment to: London, W1H 7EH Centaur Conferences, Customer Services, TEL: 0870 333 9116 Third Floor, 50 Poland Street, London, W1F 7AX EMAIL: Marble Arch TUBE: www.thistlehotels.com ONE-DAY CONFERENCE 3102 PAYMENT PLEASE TICK APPROPRIATE BOXES AND COMPLETE DETAILS Payment must be made in advance of the event. If payment is not received before the £899 + VAT (£1056.33) conference, you will be asked to pay by credit card before entering the conference. Your fee includes CD-ROM, refreshments and lunch. I am unable to attend but would like to purchase the Documentation
Recommended publications
  • JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London

    JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London

    JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London • Unmissable human rights CPD event for 2018 • Keynote speeches from leaders in the field • Workshops on criminal justice, women’s human rights, earn judicial review, immigration and asylum, privacy, security and 6 cpd surveillance and life, death and human rights hours • The latest domestic and international human rights case-law • All income supports the work of JUSTICE Plenary speeches from: Panel sessions with: • Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill • Michael Fordham QC • Karon Monaghan QC • Harriet Wistrich • Angela Rafferty QC • Baroness Shami Chakrabarti • Nathalie Lieven QC • Max Hill QC • + many others to be confirmed follow us on twitter @justicehq PROGRAMME OF THE DAY Join JUSTICE 9.00 REGISTRATION AND REFRESHMENTS JUSTICE is an all-party law reform and human rights organisation working to strengthen the justice system – administrative, civil and 9.30 CHAIR’S WELCOME criminal – in the United Kingdom. Andrea Coomber, Director, JUSTICE 9.45 MORNING KEYNOTE ADDRESS: JUSTICE is independent JUSTICE is expert JUSTICE is influential Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill 10.15 REVIEW OF THE YEAR JUSTICE is effective JUSTICE is international Karon Monaghan QC, Matrix Chambers 11.00 COFFEE JUSTICE relies on the support of its members and donors for the funds to carry out its vital work. Please join us today. 11.30 MORNING WORKSHOPS 1. Criminal Justice and Human Rights 14.00 AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS “Access to justice, human rights and the rule of law – as a lawyer and as a Chair: HH Peter Rook QC democrat, I can think of few causes more important to defend and extend.
  • N Easy Access of Both Central London and Heathrow.”

    N Easy Access of Both Central London and Heathrow.”

    The international journal of gacommercial and treaty arbitratiron NEWS Advocacy workshop comes to the UK Tom Toulson Friday, 04 June 2010 The Foundation for International Arbitration Advocacy is running a workshop outside its base in Switzerland for the first time. The workshop on the questioning of expert witnesses will take place over the first three days in July at Beaumont House. Twenty-four participants will get the chance to cross-examine experts from FTI Consulting and Ernst & Young - and will receive feedback on live and video-recorded performances. The sessions will be run by experienced arbitration specialists, who will also give demonstrations and lectures. The FIAA was established in 2007 to provide training to lawyers from different jurisdictions in the art of advocacy tailored to arbitration. According to one of the founders, David Roney, The international journal of a partner at Schellenbergg Wittmeracomme rincial Geneva,and treaty arbitrati rtheon decision to bring the workshops outside Switzerland is part of an international strategy. “By taking our workshop to other major arbitration centres and developing markets, we aim to make them accessible to a broader audience by reducing travel costs. We chose Beaumont House in Windsor because it offers first-rate residential conference facilities and is within easy access of both central London and Heathrow.” The organisation plans to run its next workshop in São Paulo in the autumn of 2010. Based on those who have registered for the July event already, Roney expects half the participants will be from the UK and half from countries in Europe and North America. The course costs £985, which also covers accommodation and meals.
  • Competition Law Journal

    Competition Law Journal

    COMPETITION LAW JOURNAL Consultant Editor: The Hon Mr Justice Roth, Judge of the High Court (Chancery Division) and President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Editors: Sarah Long, Partner, Euclid Law Limited, Andrew North, of Counsel, Herbert Smith Freehills ISSN Print LLP and Matthew O’Regan, Barrister, St John’s 1476-9085 Chambers ISSN Online 2516-5771 The Competition Law Journal provides competition practitioners with a reliable source of analysis on the law and practice in the UK and EU. To place a subscription: Its primary focus is on all aspects of UK competition law, from legal, economic and policy perspectives. It also addresses important developments in EU and international The Subscriptions Dept competition law. Combining authoritative editorial comment and articles, the Journal is edited and Marston Book Services Ltd articles are written by leading practitioners in the field and includes analysis of essential case law, 160 Eastern Avenue, Milton Park, CMA and European Commission decisions and relevant economic analysis presented in an accessible, Abingdon practitioner-focused manner. OXON OX14 4SB UK Tel: +44 1235 465574 Published quarterly, to keep you fully up-to-date with the latest developments, Competition Law Journal Fax: +44 1235 465556 is a key reference in every competition and corporate law library. Email: [email protected] Competition Law Journal provides: For more information • concise, practitioner-focused articles on UK, European and international competition law and practice Email: [email protected]
  • Affidavit-Other

    Affidavit-Other

    10-PR-16-46 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 8/11/2021 3:24 PM STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF CARVER FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT PROBATE DIVISION In the Matter of: Court File No. lO-PR-16-46 Judge Kevin W. Eide Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, DECLARATION OF STEVEN MARK Decedent. TREGEAR I, Steven Mark Tregear, declare and state as follows: 1. I am a partner at Russells, a law firm located in London, United Kingdom I am the head of the litigation department at Russells and have been practicing law for more than 30 years. I specialize in representing clients in the entertainment industry, including major record and music publishing companies, artists, and athletes. Russells serves as counsel for Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A. (“Comerica”), the Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson (the “Estate”) in the United Kingdom, including in connection with the Estate’s dispute with Warner Chappell Music Italiana S.r.1. (“Warner Chappell”) and related parties. I am the lead attorney representing the Estate in the U.K. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of the detailed ledgers underlying the invoices that were submitted to the Court by Comerica as Exhibit H to the June 30, 2021 Declaration of Mark Greiner. The initials of each time keeper billing time to the Estate is in the third column, under fee earner. “ST” is me, “RV” is my c01porate transactions partner Ryan 10-PR-16-46 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 8/11/2021 3:24 PM Vince, “AR” is Alice Rudge, a more junior litigation solicitor in our office, and “WC” is William Cameron, a trainee solicitor in our office.
  • PRIVACY NOTICE for MENTORING SCHEME 1. One Essex Court, Brick

    PRIVACY NOTICE for MENTORING SCHEME 1. One Essex Court, Brick

    PRIVACY NOTICE FOR MENTORING SCHEME 1. One Essex Court, Brick Court Chambers, Blackstone Chambers, Essex Court Chambers, Fountain Court Chambers and 3VB (“Chambers”) are data controllers for the purposes of processing mentoring scheme applicants’ data. 2. This policy applies in relation to any application for the mentoring scheme at the participating Chambers and during the course of a mentorship. The General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) requires us to provide this notice to you. COLLECTION OF PERSONAL DATA 3. Personal data processed and collected by us includes: a. personal data collected during the application process or during the course of the mentoring relationship, or from any further correspondence by phone, email or otherwise; b. personal data collected by and on behalf of the participating Chambers to enable us to process payments to mentees; c. personal data received via the centralized application process; and d. personal data collected from third parties in the course of taking references in support of an application. We will seek information from third parties with your consent only. 4. The personal data collected includes any personal details including name, address, contact details, education and training, employment, right to work in the UK and financial information where relevant. 5. Sensitive personal data collected with your consent may include information about medical or health conditions, including whether or not you have a disability for which Chambers needs to make reasonable adjustments; and information about your racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, trade union membership, sex life and sexual orientation and religion or philosophical belief. WHY WE PROCESS PERSONAL DATA 6.
  • James Flynn QC | Brick Court Chambers

    James Flynn QC | Brick Court Chambers

    Brick Court Chambers 7-8 Essex Street, London WC2R 3LD DX 302 London Chancery Lane James Flynn QC YEAR OF CALL: 1978 YEAR OF SILK: 2003 "A highly accomplished advocate and adviser who is very easy to work with and puts clients at ease." "He has one of the finest analytical minds at the Competition Bar." Chambers & Partners 2015 Clerk's Email: [email protected] Practice Overview James Flynn QC is a leading competition law litigator at the London Bar. His wide experience at the Bar builds on his years of practice at a magic circle law firm in London and Brussels together with his work as a Legal Secretary at the European Court of Justice. Current high profile cases in London include acting for the Road Haulage Association in the proposed collective proceedings against the truck cartel and for GSK in its appeal against the UK’s first pharmaceutical patent reverse settlement proceedings (currently the subject of a reference to the European Court of Justice). He has considerable expertise concerning the interface between Competition and Intellectual Property law, particularly on the licensing of standard essential patents and FRAND terms (acting for Qualcomm, IP Com and Samsung) as well as ‘pay for delay.’ Significant CAT appeals in recent years include acting for Sky in the long-running Pay TV litigation; for BMI in relation to the Private Healthcare Market Investigation; for Aer Lingus in its dispute over Ryanair’s protracted hostile shareholding; and for Asda in the successful appeals against the OFT’s Tobacco decision. His considerable experience of competition damages cases embraces follow-on (public examples include envelopes, synthetic rubber and CRT and LCD screens) and standalone actions in the High Court and CAT, including acting for Inntrepreneur in Courage v Crehan, the first standalone damages case to go to full trial in the United Kingdom, and for Cardiff Bus in the first follow-on damages action to come to trial and to lead to a damages award.
  • Just and Accountable Development

    Just and Accountable Development

    Just and Accountable Development 2014 Annual Report & 2015 Review 38 COUNTRIES ISLP at Work 3 170 PROJECTS Letter from the Co-Presidents 4 Letter from the Executive Director 5 Natural Resources 6 Vulnerable Communities 6 Case Study: Kenya’s Kerio Valley 7 Investment, Trade & Tax 8 Economic & Social Development 8 Case Study: Liberia Boosts Small Businesses 9 Strengthening Media Freedoms 10 Supporting Civil Society 11 Law Firms and Barristers’ 57 Chambers Partnerships 12 LAW FIRMS Awards & Publications 12 Volunteers 13 10 LANGUAGES Donors 14 Financial Statements 14 Board of Directors and Staff 15 22,000 Law Firm Donors 16 PRO BONO HOURS 2 A GLOBAL IMPACT ISLP at Work ISLP’s mission is to foster just and accountable development which is sustainable, supportive of human rights, and strengthens the rule of law, by mobilizing our unique network of highly skilled and experienced pro bono lawyers to advise civil society and governments. NATURAL VULNERABLE CIVIL SOCIETY 25 RESOURCES COMMUNITIES SPACE COUNTRIES WITH ONSITE MISSIONS ECONOMIC ANTI- INVESTMENT, & SOCIAL CORRUPTION TRADE & TAX $9.5m DEVELOPMENT IN DONATED SERVICES 3 LETTERS Letter from the “ We cannot thank enough those of our many friends for generously Letter from the providing the financial, service, and moral support to permit us to Co-Presidents realize our dream.” Co-Presidents Dear Friends, would have worked in some 60 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe; and that we would have a widely–recognized record As the 2014 Annual Report goes to press, ISLP has completed a comprehensive strategic of significant accomplishment.
  • For Release After 12Pm Wednesday 27 July 2011 Pro

    For Release After 12Pm Wednesday 27 July 2011 Pro

    FOR RELEASE AFTER 12PM WEDNESDAY 27 JULY 2011 PRO BONO LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES NAMED FOR LONDON 2012 OLYMPIC AND PARALYMIC GAMES With exactly one year to go until the opening of the Games, Sport Resolutions, The Bar Council, Law Society and the British Association of Sport and Law have today announced the names of the 17 solicitors' firms and barristers’ chambers and the 19 individual advocates who have been appointed to the London 2012 Pro Bono Legal Advice and Representation Service. The final lists were selected from over 150 applications from members of the UK legal profession who offered their services during the Games. The Service is being established at the request of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games. It assembles solicitors, barristers and individual practitioners to provide free legal advice and representation from 9 July to 12 September 2012 for accredited athletes, coaches, team officials, National Olympic Committees, National Paralympic Committees and International Federations. A general service covering six areas of law is to be offered along with a sports advocacy service for athletes appearing before the ad hoc division of the International Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) which sits during the period of the Games. The Service is being managed by Sport Resolutions, the specialist independent dispute service, with appointments made by a Selection Committee made up of representatives from the Bar Council, Law Society and the British Association of Sport and Law. GENERAL SECTION Firm/Chambers
  • The Impact of COVID-19 Measures on the Civil Justice System – Appendices

    The Impact of COVID-19 Measures on the Civil Justice System – Appendices

    Report and recommendations The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system – Appendices Dr Natalie Byrom Sarah Beardon Dr Abby Kendrick May 2020 Table of Contents APPENDIX A- LIST OF RESPONDENTS TO CONSULTATION INBOX ................................................ 2 A. GROUP RESPONSES...................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES ............................................................................................................................................ 3 APPENDIX B: LITERATURE REVIEW: THE IMPACT OF THE RAPID EXPANSION OF REMOTE HEARINGS IN THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM........................................................................... 4 APPENDIX C: UNDERSTANDING THE WORK CONDUCTED IN THE COUNTY COURTS DURING COVID-19 ............................................................................................................................................ 14 APPENDIX D: CODING CATEGORIES FOR TYPES OF HEARING ...................................................... 17 APPENDIX E: SUMMARY OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL OUTPUTS .................. 18 APPENDIX F: SUMMARY OF REMOTE PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ................................ 25 DIGITAL INEQUALITY .........................................................................................................................................................25 DOES A REMOTE HEARING GIVE YOU A ‘DAY IN COURT’? .............................................................................................25
  • Daniel Piccinin | Brick Court Chambers

    Daniel Piccinin | Brick Court Chambers

    Brick Court Chambers 7-8 Essex Street, London WC2R 3LD DX 302 London Chancery Lane Daniel Piccinin YEAR OF CALL: 2010 "Incredibly clear-sighted when dealing with complex issues and brings a deep understanding of the economics of cases." Chambers & Partners 2020 Clerk's Email: [email protected] Practice Overview Daniel Piccinin specialises in litigation that raises complex economic, financial and commercial issues – in particular competition law. Since leaving his competition specialist practice at Linklaters in 2010, Daniel has appeared, both led and unled, in a number of landmark competition cases at the Bar. He acted for Aer Lingus in theRyanair/Aer Lingus saga, appearing successfully before the CAT and Court of Appeal on three separate occasions each, as well as acting unled for Aer Lingus in proceedings before the General Court in Luxembourg. He has also appeared in a number of cases in the smartphone wars, most recently for Ericsson in theUnwired Planet litigation. He acted for Dow in the first ever cartel damages claim to go to trial in the UK, for NEG in the CRT Glass damages claim, and LG Display (unled) challenging jurisdiction in theLCD damages claim. He is currently acting for Visa in what is scheduled to be the longest competition law trial of 2016/2017 in the Commercial Court, and is due to defend the CMA’s landmark “pay for delay” infringement decision in the Competition Appeal Tribunal in 2017. He has also appeared at hearings (both led and unled) in several competition law investigations before the UK competition authorities and the European Commission.
  • The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms And

    The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms And

    2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith is everything you could want from a law firm. First-rate training and market-leading work alongside some of the City’s finest lawyers. Prestigious clients. The opportunity to progress. And all in a supportive, non-hierarchical and inclusive environment. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 Chambers Reports Atkin Chambers p.662 Littleton Chambers p.740 2 Bedford Row p.664 Maitland Chambers p.744 Blackstone Chambers p.668 Matrix Chambers p.748 Brick Court Chambers p.672 Monckton Chambers p.752 Cloisters Chambers p.676 4 New Square p.754 Crown Office Chambers p.680 No5 Barristers’ Chambers p.758 Devereux p.683 XXIV Old Buildings p.761 Erskine Chambers p.687 Outer Temple Chambers p.764 One Essex Court p.691 4 Pump Court p.768 5 Essex Court p.694 Pump Court Tax Chambers p.772 Essex Court Chambers p.696 Quadrant Chambers p.776 Falcon Chambers p.700 Queen Elizabeth Building QEB p.780 Farrar’s Building p.703 Radcliffe Chambers p.783 Fountain Court Chambers p.707 Serle Court p.786 Francis Taylor Building p.711 South Square p.790 Hailsham Chambers p.714 St Philips Chambers p.794 1 Hare Court p.718 4 Stone Buildings p.797 Henderson Chambers p.721 Tanfield Chambers p.801 11KBW p.724 2 Temple Gardens p.804 Keating Chambers p.728 3 Verulam Buildings p.808 7 King’s Bench Walk p.732 Wilberforce Chambers p.812 Landmark Chambers p.736 chambersstudent.co.uk Chambers Reports Chambers Reports Choosing where to apply for pupillage is hard.
  • International Insolvency Response to COVID-19 Crisis

    International Insolvency Response to COVID-19 Crisis

    International Corporate Rescue – Special Issue International Insolvency Response to COVID-19 Crisis 1 Coping Collectively with the COVID-19 Crisis Bob Wessels 5 Australia’s Measures to Address the Economic Impact of COVID-19 Orla McCoy, Mikhail Glavac and Tom Gardner 9 Directors’ Duties in a COVID-19 World John Whiteoak, Kevin Pullen and Andrew Cooke 15 The Impact of the CARES Act on US Consumers, Small Businesses, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Laws and Procedures Daniel A. Lowenthal and Lance Kodish 18 The German COVID-19 Insolvency Suspension Act (COVInsAG) Dr. Artur M. Swierczok 25 France: A Country at War against the Coronavirus Pandemic Anker Sorensen 32 Measures to Support the Dutch Economy Robert van Galen 34 Return of the MAC: The English Courts’ Approach to Material Adverse Change Clauses Jeremy Richmond QC and Liisa Lahti 37 COVID-19: Developments in Austrian Restructuring Law Marcus Benes and Karoline Hofmann 44 Outline of Anti-COVID-19 Crisis Measures in Poland Karol Czepukojć 48 The Position of UK Directors during the COVID-19 Pandemic Robert-Jan Temmink QC and Stephanie Barrett 52 Re Debenhams Retail Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 600 Frank Clarke 55 Developments in the UK as a Result of COVID-19 Devi Shah and Nicola Collins 59 Relief for US Businesses in Response to COVID-19: The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act 2020 Scott C. Shelley 62 A Black Swan Event Kathleen Stephansen 64 An Economic Catastrophe Kathleen Stephansen Editor-in-Chief Publishers Mark Fennessy, Proskauer Rose LLP, London Chase Cambria Company (Publishing) Ltd Publisher 4 Winifred Close Sasha Radoja, Travers Smith LLP, London Barnet, Arkley Editorial Board Hertfordshire EN5 3LR Emanuella Agostinelli, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle United Kingdom LLP, Milan Scott Atkins, Norton Rose Fulbright, Sydney Annual Subscriptions James Bennett, KPMG, London A hardcopy subscription is EUR 730 / USD 890 / GBP 520; Prof.