Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Philosophy Faculty Publications Philosophy Department 2010 Comment and Discussion: Pramāņa Are Factive - A Response to Jonardon Ganeri Matthew aD sti Bridgewater State University,
[email protected] Stephen H. Phillips University of Texas at Austin Virtual Commons Citation Dasti, Matthew and Phillips, Stephen H. (2010). Comment and Discussion: Pramāņa Are Factive - A Response to Jonardon Ganeri. In Philosophy Faculty Publications. Paper 3. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/philosophy_fac/3 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION Prama¯n.a Are Factive — A Response to Jonardon Ganeri Matthew Dasti and Stephen H. Phillips Department of Philosophy, Bridgewater State University Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin Recently, Jonardan Ganeri reviewed the collaborative translation of the first chapter of Gan˙ges´a’s Tattvacinta¯man.i by Stephen H. Phillips and N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya (Ganeri 2007). The review is quite favorable, and we have no desire to dispute his kind words. Ganeri does, however, put forth an argument in opposition to a funda- mental line of interpretation given by Phillips and Ramanuja Tatacharya about the nature of prama¯n.a, knowledge sources, as understood by Gan˙ges´a and, for that mat- ter, Nya¯ya tradition. This response is meant to answer the argument and reassert an understanding of prama¯n.a as factive, that is, as knowledge sources that are inerrant. We argue that this is the best reading of Gan˙ges´a himself and of Nya¯ya tradition, and is defensible on purely philosophical grounds.