Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for the Sterling Wind Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN EAGLE TAKE PERMIT FOR THE STERLING WIND PROJECT Prepared for U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Region 2 U.S. Department of Interior Prepared by HAWKPOINT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, LLC 4508 Sunset Canyon PL NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87111 Telephone: (505) 449-7918 November 29, 2018 This document is a working draft. We anticipate it will evolve and improve over the course of applying it to tier from the PEIS. Accordingly, the contents of these instructions should not be viewed as binding or official U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service policy. Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for the Sterling Wind Project TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Authorities .................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Background .................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Scoping, Consulting, and Coordination ....................................................................... 4 2.4 Tribal Coordination ...................................................................................................... 5 3 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................ 6 3.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Alternative 1: No Action .............................................................................................. 6 3.3 Other Alternatives Considered but not Evaluated in this Environmental Assessment 7 3.3.1 Alternative 2: Deny Permit ................................................................................... 7 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................ 7 4.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Bald Eagle .................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Golden Eagle ................................................................................................................ 9 4.4 Migratory Birds .......................................................................................................... 10 4.5 Species Listed Under the Endangered Species Act .................................................... 12 4.6 Cultural and Socio-economic Interests ...................................................................... 12 4.7 Climate Change .......................................................................................................... 12 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES..................................................................... 12 5.1 Bald Eagle .................................................................................................................. 13 5.2 Golden Eagle .............................................................................................................. 13 5.2.1 Proposed Action .................................................................................................. 13 5.2.2 Alternative 1 : No Action .................................................................................... 15 5.2.3 Comparison of Effects of Each Alternative ........................................................ 15 5.3 Migratory Birds .......................................................................................................... 16 5.4 Species Listed Under the Endangered Species Act .................................................... 17 5.5 Cultural and Socio-economic Interests ...................................................................... 17 5.6 Climate Change .......................................................................................................... 17 6 EVALUATION OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS .......................................................... 17 6.1 Bald Eagle .................................................................................................................. 18 6.2 Golden Eagle .............................................................................................................. 18 6.3 Migratory Birds .......................................................................................................... 20 6.4 Species Listed Under the Endangered Species Act .................................................... 20 6.5 Cultural and Socio-Economic Interests ...................................................................... 21 6.6 Climate Change .......................................................................................................... 21 7 MITIGATION AND MONITORING ........................................................................... 21 8 LIST OF PREPARERS .................................................................................................. 23 9 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 24 i Hawkpoint Environmental Consulting November 2018 Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for the Sterling Wind Project LIST OF TABLES Table 5.1 Summary and Comparison of Effects of Each Alternative................................15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Sterling Wind Project Location Map...................................................................3 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy for the Sterling Wind Project Appendix B Eagle Conservation Plan for the Sterling Wind Project Appendix C Sterling Wind Retrofitting Plan for the Sterling Wind Project Appendix D Example 2016 Tribal Correspondence Letter and Responses ii Hawkpoint Environmental Consulting November 2018 Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for the Sterling Wind Project LIST OF ACRONYMS AEM AEM Wind, LLC APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee BBCS Bird Bat Conservation Strategy BCR Bird Conservation Region dBA A-weighted-decibel DDT Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane EA Environmental Assessment ECP Eagle Conservation Plan EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMU Eagle Management Unit ESA Endangered Species Act GPS Global Positioning System ha Hectare ITP Incidental Take Permit km Kilometer kV Kilovolt LAP Local Area Population LCEC Lea County Electric Cooperative m Meter MW Megawatt NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMDGF New Mexico Department of Game and Fish PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service iii Hawkpoint Environmental Consulting November 2018 Environmental Assessment for the Issuance of an Eagle Take Permit for the Sterling Wind Project 1 INTRODUCTION This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issuing a 30-year incidental take permit (ITP) for golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) associated with the operation of the Sterling Wind Project pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] §§ 4321–4347). Issuance of an ITP by the USFWS for take that is incidental to otherwise lawful activities under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. §§ 668–668d and 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] § 22.26) constitutes a discretionary Federal action that is subject to NEPA. This EA assists the USFWS in ensuring compliance with the NEPA, and in deciding as to whether any “significant” impacts could result from the analyzed actions that would require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This EA evaluates the effects of alternatives for our decision whether to issue an eagle ITP. The Eagle Act authorizes the USFWS to issue ITPs only when the take is compatible with the preservation of each eagle species, defined (in USFWS 2016a) as “consistent with the goals of maintaining stable or increasing breeding populations in all eagle management units (EMU) and the persistence of local populations throughout the geographic range of each species.” The applicant, AEM Wind, LLC (AEM), is requesting Eagle Act take coverage for operation activities associated with the Sterling Wind Project (Project). This company is an affiliate of Akuo Energy USA (Akuo Energy). The applicant has requested a 30-year ITP for golden eagles under the Eagle Act at the Sterling Wind Project located in Tatum, New Mexico. The applicant’s Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP) (Appendix B) is the foundation of the permit application for the Project. The applicant is requesting a permit for the take of five eagles over the 30-year life of the Project. This EA evaluates whether issuance of the eagle ITP will have significant impacts on the existing human environment. “Significance” under NEPA is defined by regulation at 40 CFR 1508.27, and requires short- and long-term consideration of both the context of a proposal and its intensity. This proposal conforms with, and carries out, the management approach analyzed in, and adopted subsequent to, the USFWS’s Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the Eagle Rule Revision, December 2016 (USFWS 2016a).