TRAINS 2020 Magazine Index
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aerotrain.Pdf
in Passenger Train Travel The new lightweight Aerotrain, developed by Electro-Motive Division of General Motors, points the way to hitherto unequalled standards of speed, comfort, and economy in train travel. This 10-coach experimental train incorporates a new concept in integrated design of Diesel 40 PASSENGERS 40 PASSENGERS motive power and cars, with Air Suspension 16 TONS · 16 TONS springing, to give passengers a smoother ride at sustained speeds of 100 miles an hour. --------------32 TONS ~~!:==~~~ It is General Motors' answer to the railroads' Each car of the Aerotraln can be equipped with an The Aerotrain is designed to carry more live weight need for passenger-hauling equipment that will airplane-type stainless steel galley for the preparation less dead weight. Two of the 40-passenger cars weigh and serving of light meals and refreshments. reduce capital investment and cost less to approximately 32 tons as compared with 65 tons for the operate and maintain. conventional SO-passenger coach. The new experimental Aerotrain, with its time-proved GM Diesel power, and revolutionary principles of economical lightweight construction, is another con tribution by General Motors to the progress of railroading. It will put new scheduled speed, a new concept of "air ride" comfort and striking economies behind the railroads' bid for travel business. You _......, rWe 011 air-Novel suspension sys t'Aml g( Ge~sal M~ new .AM'Qtrain makef use of co..;ri!liled air in tt)b~ bellD'W.S rather than conven tional Jtteel -aprjnging. Air suspension stabilM and eu.QioRIJ the ride, whether the ear has only a few The air-conditioned cars of the General ~ or is fully load~ t.tlti :maims a major Motors Aerotrain are an adaptation of eon~ to w~t redu~ the present body of the GMC 40-pas senger intercity-type highway coach. -
Annual Report 2015-2016 Crop Year
Annual Report 2015-2016 Crop Year Monitoring the Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System ii Annual Report of the Monitor – Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System Quorum Corporation Suite 701, 9707–110 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2L9 Telephone: 780 / 447-2111 Fax: 780 / 451-8710 Website: www.quorumcorp.net Email: [email protected] Members of the Quorum Corporation Advisory Board Mark A. Hemmes Chairman of the Advisory Board President, Quorum Corporation Edmonton, Alberta J. Marcel Beaulieu Director – Research and Analysis, Quorum Corporation Sherwood Park, Alberta Richard B. Boyd Senior Vice President, Canadian National Railway Company (retired) Kelowna, British Columbia A. Bruce McFadden Director – Research and Analysis, Quorum Corporation Edmonton, Alberta Shelley J. Thompson President, SJT Solutions Southey, Saskatchewan Members of the Grain Monitoring Team Mark Hemmes President Marcel Beaulieu Director – Research and Analysis Bruce McFadden Director – Research and Analysis Vincent Roy Senior Technical Officer Taylor Massicotte Transportation Analyst Annual Report of the Grain Monitor: 2015-16 Crop Year ISBN – 978-0-9936969-3-0 Copyright: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by the Minister of Transport This report is available on the Quorum Corporation website. www.grainmonitor.ca 2015-2016 Crop Year iii Foreword The following report details the performance of Canada’s Grain Handling and Transportation System (GHTS) for the crop year ended 31 July 2016, and focuses on the various events, issues and trends manifest in the movement of Western Canadian grain during the past year. This is the sixteenth annual report submitted by Quorum Corporation in its capacity as the Monitor appointed under the Government of Canada’s Grain Monitoring Program (GMP). -
Report on Streamline, Light-Weight, High-Speed Passenger Trains
T F 570 .c. 7 I ~38 t!of • 3 REPORT ON STREAMLINE, LIGHT-WEIGHT, HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER TRAINS June 30, 1938 • DEC COVE RDALE & COL PITTS CONSULTING ENGINEERS 120 WALL STREE:T, N ltW YORK REPORT ON STREAMLINE, LIGHT-WEIGHT HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER TRAINS June 30. 1938 COVERDALE & COLPITTS " CONSUL..TING ENGINEERS 1a0 WALL STREET, NEW YORK INDEX PAOES J NTRODUC'r!ON • s-s PR£FATORY R£MARKS 9 uNION PAC! FIC . to-IJ Gen<ral statement City of Salina >ioRTH WESTERN-UNION PAcln c City of Portland City of Los Angd<S Cit)' of Denve'r NoRTH W£sTERN-l.:~<IOS P \ l"IIIC-Sm 1HrR" PACirJc . '9"'~1 Cit)' of San Francisco Forty Niner SouTHERN PAclnC. Sunbeam Darlight CHICAco, BuR~lNGTON & QuiN<'' General statement Origin:tl Zephyr Sam Houston Ourk State Mark Twain Twin Citi<S Zephyn Den\'tr Zephyrs CHICACO, ~ULWACK.EE, ST. l'AUL AND PACit' lt• Hiawatha CHICAOO AND NoRTH \Yss·rr;J<s . ,; -tOO" .•hCHISON, T orEKJ\ AND SAN'rA FE General statement Super Chief 1:.1 Capitan Son Diegon Chicagoan and Kansas Cityon Golden Gate 3 lJID£X- COIIIinutd PACES CmCAco, RocK IsLAND AND PACIFIC 46-50 General statement Chicago-Peoria Rocket Chicago-Des Moines Rocket Kansas City-Minneapolis Rocket Kansas City-Oklahoma City Rocket Fort Worth-Dallas-Houston Rocket lLuNOJS CENTRAL • Green Diamond GULF, MOBlL£ AI<D NORTHERN 53-55 Rebels New YoRK Cesr&AI•. Mercury Twentieth Century Limited, Commodore Vanderbilt PENNSYLVANiA . 57 Broadway Lirruted, Liberty Limited, General, Spirit of St. Louis BALTIMORE AND 0HJO • ss Royal Blue BALTIMORE AND OHIO-ALTO!\ • Abraham Lincoln Ann Rutledge READ!KC Crusader New YoRK, NEw HAvEN A~'l> HARTFORD Comet BosToN AND MAINE-MAt"£ CeNTRAL Flying Yankee CONCLUSION 68 REPORT ON STREA M LINE, LIGHT-WEIGHT, HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER TRA INS As of June 30, 1938 BY CovERDALE & COLPITTS INTRODUCTION N January 15, 1935, we made a the inauguration ofservice by the Zephyr O report on the performance of and a statement comparing the cost of the first Zephyr type, streamline, operation of the Zephyr with that of the stainless steel, light-weight, high-speed, trains it replaced. -
History and Aesthetics in Suspension Bridges
History and Aesthetics in Suspension Bridges 1 6-01 john a roebling_150dpi.jpg Today we trace the evolution of steel bridge design from its first American innovator, JA Roebling up through 1930’s New York In the 30’s in New York, despite hard economic times, many huge structures were erected 2 6-02 empire state building_150dpi.jpg The Empire State Building, tallest in the world About which more later 3 6-03 george washington bridge_150dpi.jpg The GW Bridge, longest suspension span by a factor of two, and 4 6-04 bayonne bridge_150dpi.jpg The Bayonne Bridge, longest arch span in the world, barely surpassing the Sydney Harbor Bridge 5 6-05 othmar ammann_150dpi.jpg These last two were both designed by Othmar H. Ammann, the greatest bridge artist to use steel as his material Ammann was born in Bern, graduated 1902 from ETH and 1904 to USA. Worked from 1912-23 for Lindenthal He would study under Karl Ritter protégé of Carl Cullmann The Swiss were uniquely able to mediate the scientific rigor of the germans with the design elegance of the French 6 6-06 hell gate and triborough bridges_150dpi.jpg The story of Ammann and the GWB begins with Gustav Lindenthal, the dean of American bridge engineers Ammann had cut his teeth as design assistant to Gustav Lindenthal at the Hellgate Bridge The last great bridge of the railroad bridges. From here on the great bridges would carry road traffic rather than trains Here we see two bridges, Hellgate and Triborough, on which Ammann would work, but not express his aesthetic vision 7 6-08 gustav lindenthal_150dpi.jpg Hellgate designer Lindnethal Born in Brunn in Austria, now Brno in the Czech Republic Designed a bridge at Pittsburgh, a lenticular truss to replace Roebling’s Smithfield St. -
CP's North American Rail
2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR -
Gustav Lindenthal's Little Hell Gate Rail Bridge
ear the flagship Hell Gate Bridge (STRUCTURE, October 2013), and crossing a former inlet between Historic Wards and Randalls Islands, stands NGustav Lindenthal’s still-in-service 1915 Little Hell Gate Bridge; four unique skewed-deck truss structures spans of reverse parabolic bowstring arches. They are visually striking, sited as they are above flat significant structures of the past land and below miles of high plate-girder via- ducts. The total length between centers of the abutments is 1153.5 feet. Four-rail tracks operate on the 60-foot wide deck (Figure 1). Figure 1. Flanked by viaduct spans, the century-old, The War Department at that time regulated water- still in service, distinctive Little Hell Gate Bridge ways and, as this arm of the East River was only a reverse bowstring arch-spans suspend; with the Hell few feet deep and would not carry maritime traffic, it Gate and Triborough Bridges beyond. HAER NY 121- ® granted approvals in 1906 and 1912 for piers in the 16, Weinstein, Photographer, 1996. inlet and the use of falsework for the construction. Later, landfill from the Triborough Bridge project Formwork consisted of two-inch thick, ship- (Ammann, 1937) entirely filled the inlet. lap timber sheeting under four by eight-inch studs, held with wales and then bolted end-to- Timber and Masonry end for tensioning against leakage. The river for the Piers pier shaftCopyright forms were barrel-hooped. The Portland cement concrete piers bear at four tons On Randalls Island, con- per square foot on foundations of hard strata, typically crete was mixed on-site in Gustav Lindenthal’s Little mica schist, encountered at a shallow depth of about a hopper below ground Hell Gate Rail Bridge 12-15 feet below mean low water. -
Bayonne Bridge Lesson Plan
The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Resources for Teachers and Students [Printable and Electronic Versions] The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Resources for Teachers And Students [Printable and Electronic Versions] OVERVIEW/OBJECTIVE: Students will be able to understand and discuss the history of NOTES: the Bayonne Bridge and use science and engineering basics • Key words indicated in to investigate bridge design and test an arch bridge model. Bold are defined in call- out boxes. TARGET GRADE LEVEL: • Teacher-only text Fourth grade instruction, adaptable to higher levels as indicated with Italics. desired in the subjects of Social Studies and Engineering. FOCUS: In Part I, students learn about history of the Bayonne Bridge including the many engineering challenges encountered during the project and the people who helped overcome those challenges. In Part II, students learn engineering concepts to understand how bridges stay up and use these concepts to complete activities on bridge design before applying these concepts to theorize how the Bayonne Bridge works. MATERIALS: • Part I: DVD of “The Bayonne Bridge Documentary” • Part II: 2–4 heavy textbooks or 2 bricks per group; 2 pieces of “cereal box” cardboard or similar, 12 x 8 in; weights (anything small that can be stacked on the structure); red and blue marker, crayon or colored pencil for each student or group. The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Contents Teacher Materials | Part I: History of the Bayonne Bridge . T-1 Teacher Materials | Part II: Bridge Engineering . T-7 Student Materials | Part I: History of the Bayonne Bridge . S-1 Student Materials | Part II: Bridge Engineering . -
Stronger Ties: a Shared Commitment to Railway Safety
STRONGER TIES: A S H A R E D C O M M I T M E N T TO RAILWAY SAFETY Review of the Railway Safety Act November 2007 Published by Railway Safety Act Review Secretariat Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N5 This report is available at: www.tc.gc.ca/tcss/RSA_Review-Examen_LSF Funding for this publication was provided by Transport Canada. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department. ISBN 978-0-662-05408-5 Catalogue No. T33-16/2008 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport, 2007 This material may be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. Photo Credits: Chapters 1-10: Transport Canada; Appendix B: CP Images TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................1 1.1 Rationale for the 2006 Railway Safety Act Review . .2 1.2 Scope . 2 1.3 Process ....................................................................................3 1.3.1 Stakeholder Consultations . .4 1.3.2 Research . 6 1.3.3 Development of Recommendations .......................................6 1.4 Key Challenges for the Railway Industry and the Regulator.................7 1.5 A Word of Thanks .................................................................... 10 2. STATE OF RAIL SAFETY IN CANADA ...................................11 2.1 Accidents 1989-2006 ................................................................. 12 2.2 Categories of Accidents . 13 2.2.1 Main Track Accidents...................................................... 14 2.2.2 Non-Main Track Accidents ............................................... 15 2.2.3 Crossing and Trespasser Accidents . 15 2.2.4 Transportation of Dangerous Goods Accidents and Incidents . 17 2.3 Normalizing Accidents . 18 2.4 Comparing Rail Safety in Canada and the U.S. -
Q1 2012-13 Quarterly Report
First Quarter Report 2012-2013 Crop Year Monitoring the Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System ii First Quarter Report of the Monitor – Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System Quorum Corporation Suite 701, 9707–110 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2L9 Telephone: 780 / 447-2111 Fax: 780 / 451-8710 Website: www.quorumcorp.net Email: [email protected] Members of the Quorum Corporation Advisory Board Mark A. Hemmes Chairman of the Advisory Board President, Quorum Corporation Edmonton, Alberta J. Marcel Beaulieu Director – Research and Analysis, Quorum Corporation Sherwood Park, Alberta Richard B. Boyd Senior Vice President, Canadian National Railway Company (retired) Kelowna, British Columbia A. Bruce McFadden Director – Research and Analysis, Quorum Corporation Edmonton, Alberta Shelley J. Thompson President, SJT Solutions Southey, Saskatchewan Members of the Grain Monitoring Team Mark Hemmes President Marcel Beaulieu Director – Research and Analysis Bruce McFadden Director – Research and Analysis Vincent Roy Senior Technical Officer Additional copies of this report may be downloaded from the Quorum Corporation website. 2012-2013 Crop Year iii Foreword The following report details the performance of Canada’s Grain Handling and Transportation System (GHTS) for the three months ended 31 October 2012, and focuses on the various events, issues and trends manifest in the movement of Western Canadian grain during the first quarter of the 2012-13 crop year. As with the Monitor’s previous quarterly and annual reports, the report -
Roadway Open Cuts: Queens
666...111333::: RRROOOAAADDDWWWAAAYYY OOOPPPEEENNN CCCUUUTTTSSS::: QQQUUUEEEEEENNNSSS 111444 cccooorrrrrriiidddooorrrsss,,, 111000777 pppaaarrrccceeelllsss,,, 111444888...33000 aaacccrrreeesss 383 Corridor Description Parcels Total Code Acres Q01 Brooklyn-Queens Expressway: West Of 65th Street-North Of Broadway 9 7.36 Q02 Brooklyn-Queens Expressway: South Of Bulova Avenue-North Of 49th Street 3 2.01 Q03 Grand Central Parkway: 31st Street-West Of Ditmars Boulevard 13 17.56 Q04 Queens-Midtown Tunnel: Queens Portal 1 0.25 Q05 Long Island Expressway: West And East Of Greenpoint Avenue 2 0.76 Q06 Long Island Expressway: West Of Hamilton Place-East Of 69th Street 4 6.01 Q07 Long Island Expressway: Theoretical Extension Of 187th Street-Springfield Boulevard 10 6.53 Q08 Van Wyck Expressway: Union Turnpike-South Of 133rd Avenue, 22 34.34 and North Of Manton Street-Northeast Of Queens Boulevard Q09 Cross Island Parkway: West Of 147th Street-East Of Utopia Parkway 10 24.95 Q10 Grand Central Parkway: Northwest Of Union Turnpike-East Of 168th Street 7 14.24 Q11 Jackie Robinson Parkway: Southwest And Northeast Of Queens Boulevard 2 0.41 Q12 Clearview Expressway: South Of Horace Harding Expressway North-North Of 26th Avenue 15 31.88 Q13 Flushing Avenue: 56th Street-Rust Street, Maspeth 6 0.99 Q14 Queens Boulevard: West of Woodhaven Boulevard-East of I-495 service road 3 1.01 384 QQQ000111::: BBBRRROOOOOOKKKLLLYYYNNN---QQQUUUEEEEEENNNSSS EEEXXXPPPRRREEESSSSSSWWWAAAYYY::: WWWEEESSSTTT OOOFFF 666555TTTHHH SSSTTTRRREEEEEETTT---NNNOOORRRTTTHHH OOOFFF BBBRRROOOAAADDDWWWAAAYYY -
The GREAT BRIDGE ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
1 The GREAT BRIDGE ARCHITECT/DESIGNER (Othmar Ammann left his Mark on New York City) Steve Krar Perhaps no twentieth-century engineer has left a more visible mark on a major city than had Othmar Ammann on New York. His five major bridges bear much of the enormous traffic flow to and from the city. They are beautiful and efficient structures, for Ammann achieved an uncommon harmony of visual elegance, simplicity, and power with practical design. Othmar Ammann Born in Switzerland, Othmar Ammann attended the Federal Polytechnic Institute of Zurich and earned an engineering degree in 1902. He had an interest in and an aptitude for mathematics and physics. Coming to the United States In August of 1907 the Quebec Bridge over the St. Lawrence River in Canada collapsed while under construction. Ammann offered to assist in the investigation of the collapse; his well-written report on the disaster earned him respect in his profession. The Hell Gate Bridge In 1912 Ammann was a chief assistant to Gustav Lindenthal, who was preparing for the great railroad bridge between Queens and Wards Island known as Hell Gate. The span was large; the ultimate design would be the longest arch-type bridge in the world. The rapid tidal currents made impossible to erect scaffolding in the river. The Hell Gate Bridge opened in 1917 and its design communicates rigidity with almost all its weight and outward thrust carried by the lower of the two steel arches. Hudson River Bridge Ammann’s final design for the Hudson River bridge called for a 3,500-foot span twice the length of any existing bridge, between Fort Lee in New Jersey and 179 Street in Manhattan. -
1 Interview with Princeton University Professor David Billington For
Interview with Princeton University Professor David Billington for Program Three: “Bridging New York” Note: This transcript is from a videotaped interview for the “Bridging New York” segment of “Great Projects.” It has been edited lightly for readability. David Billington (DB): It’s a curious fact that at least the three leading bridge designers in our tradition in America were immigrants from German-speaking countries: Roebling, John Roebling then, in 1831, Gustav Lindenthal, who came over in 1875, and Othmar Ammann in 1904. And a major reason for that, I think, is their educational system. The fact that, at least in Roebling’s case and in Ammann’s case, they were trained in the very best engineering schools at the time. Those schools also, particularly in Ammann’s case, emphasized strongly the study of completed structures rather than just merely the tools of analysis, as so often happens in engineering schools. And so when, during Ammann’s education his head was filled with images of all kinds of structures and, therefore, he came with a strong urge to design large-scale works. So did Roebling. DB: What they found when they came to this country, these immigrant engineers, in fact in a way what drew them to the country in the first place was the wide expanse of the country which meant the wide or the great possibilities in building. And in the sense of New York City, for example, this river, the Hudson River, which was an extraordinarily wide river close to a major city. So that this was a great challenge.