Evolution of Hypercarnivory: the Effect of Specialization on Morphological and Taxonomic Diversity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Hypercarnivory: the Effect of Specialization on Morphological and Taxonomic Diversity Paleobiology, 30(1), 2004, pp. 108±128 Evolution of hypercarnivory: the effect of specialization on morphological and taxonomic diversity Jill A. Holliday and Scott J. Steppan Abstract.ÐThe effects of specialization on subsequent morphological evolution are poorly under- stood. Specialization has been implicated in both adaptive radiations that result from key inno- vations and evolutionary ``dead ends,'' where specialized characteristics appear to limit subse- quent evolutionary options. Despite much theoretical debate, however, empirical studies remain infrequent. In this paper, we use sister-group comparisons to evaluate the effect of morphological specialization to a particular ecological niche, hypercarnivory, on subsequent taxonomic and mor- phological diversity. Six sets of sister groups are identi®ed in which one clade exhibits hypercar- nivorous characteristics and the sister clade does not. Comparison results are summed across the categories ``hypercarnivore'' and ``sister group.'' We also evaluate whether increasing degrees of specialization are correlated with decreasing phenotypic variation. Results presented here indicate that specialization to hypercarnivory has no effect on taxonomic diversity, but a strong effect on subsequent morphological diversity related to the jaws and dentition, and that increasing special- ization does not correlate with morphological diversity except in the most specialized saber- toothed taxa, which exhibit higher variance than less specialized morphs, possibly due to selection on other characteristics. Jill A. Holliday and Scott J. Steppan. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Talla- hassee, Florida 32306-1100. E-mail: [email protected], E-mail: [email protected] Accepted: 21 May 2003 Introduction pattern (e.g., Price and Carr 2000), and others ®nd no effect at all (e.g., Wiegmann et al. 1993; The effect of specialization on subsequent de Queiroz 1999; Janz et al. 2001). taxonomic and morphological evolution is Despite numerous studies of the effect of fundamentally important to the tempo and specialization on taxonomic diversi®cation, mode of evolution and the role of adaptation studies of its effects on subsequent morpho- in macroevolution (e.g., Futuyma and Moreno logical diversity (disparity) are few. In a the- 1988; Janz et al. 2001). However, there is little oretical context, many workers have suggest- consensus as to how specialization affects di- ed that possession of certain morphological versity: does it act to increase or decrease rates character states may reduce the ability to at- of cladogenesis? How does specialization af- tain certain other states (Lauder 1981; Smith et fect probability of extinction? Does it con- al. 1985; Emerson 1988; Futuyma and Moreno strain further adaptation? Certainly, much at- 1988; Werdelin 1996; Donoghue and Ree 2000; tention has been given to the possibility that Wagner and Schwenk 2000), implying that the particular specializations may promote taxo- subsequent evolutionary trajectories of some nomic diversi®cation; that is, a morphological specialized taxa may be limited. At its ex- or behavioral specialization may act as a key treme, therefore, specialization could act as a innovation, leading to an increase in rates of dead end (Moran 1988; Janz et al. 2001), lim- cladogenesis (Liem 1973; Mitter et al. 1988; iting morphological diversi®cation and poten- Farrell et al. 1991; Hodges and Arnold 1995; tially reducing rates of cladogenesis or, alter- de Queiroz 1999; Dodd et al. 1999), but em- natively, increasing extinction rates as special- pirical studies have produced contrasting re- ized taxa reduce their ability to adapt to sults. Some workers have found that speciali- changing conditions. However, few studies zation increases taxonomic diversity (e.g., have directly identi®ed and tested effects of Liem 1973; Mitter et al. 1988; Farrell et al. 1991; specialization on subsequent phenotypic Hodges and Arnold 1995; de Queiroz 1998; change (but see Liem 1973; Moran 1988; War- Dodd et al. 1999), some report the opposite heit et al. 1999). q 2004 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved. 0094-8373/04/3001-0000/$1.00 EVOLUTION OF HYPERCARNIVORY 109 We determined the effect of dental and cra- coons (Procyonidae), and strict herbivores nial specialization to a meat-only diet, hyper- such as the giant panda. Variation in ecology carnivory, on subsequent morphological and is strongly re¯ected in the dentition (Van Val- taxonomic diversity in mammalian carni- kenburgh 1989), so a more omnivorous/fru- vores. We used an explicitly phylogenetic ap- givorous diet is accompanied by a relative in- proach and applied it to repeated convergenc- crease in grinding surfaces whereas a more es on hypercarnivory, increasing our statisti- highly carnivorous diet is re¯ected by a rela- cal power by evaluating results from multiple tive decrease in grinding surfaces and an in- sister groups. We speci®cally tested the hy- crease in shearing edges. potheses that (1) hypercarnivores have lower Because of the tight correlation between taxonomic and craniodental morphological dentition and ecology, dental characters can diversity than do their sister groups and (2) be used effectively to infer aspects of the diet increasing specialization leads to lower mor- or ecological niche. Van Valkenburgh (1988, phological diversity. To test these hypotheses, 1989) showed that variables including relative we quanti®ed and compared diversity be- blade length, canine tooth shape, premolar tween hypercarnivore clades and their prim- size and shape, and grinding area of the lower itively nonhypercarnivorous sister groups. molars distinguished between dietary types The advantage of using sister groups is that in extant carnivores. She compared guild both groups (when their stem lineages are in- compositions of carnivoran communities, cluded) have by de®nition had equal time to concluding that each guild comprised a diversify. We used both species counts and the broadly similar set of morphotypes occupying methods of Slowinski and Guyer (1993) to as- a limited number of ecological niches (Van sess taxonomic diversity. We compared mor- Valkenburgh 1988, 1989). There is thus a sub- phological diversities (disparities) by compar- stantial overlap in certain regions of mor- ing variances of factor scores obtained from phospace (Crusafont-Pairo and Truyols-San- principal-components analysis (Foote 1992, tonja 1956; Radinsky 1982; Van Valkenburgh 1993; Wills et al. 1994) and by comparing the 1988, 1989) resulting from convergence of un- differences in average frequency of character related taxa to similar ecomorphological change between categories (Sanderson 1993). types, including meat-specialists, bone-crack- Finally, we used discriminant function anal- ers/scavengers, omnivores, and generalists ysis to assign ``degrees of specialization'' to (Van Valkenburgh 1988; Werdelin 1996). Such hypercarnivores and compared the disparity iterative evolution produces natural replicates values of different levels of specialization. and is conducive for comparative study. Of the recognized carnivoran ecomorphs, The Order Carnivora the niche of the meat specialist, or hypercar- The order Carnivora is composed of 11 ex- nivore, is associated with a diet comprising tant and two extinct families of meat-eating more than 70% meat, in contrast to the gen- mammals. The diagnostic character for Car- eralist (Van Valkenburgh 1988, 1989), which nivora is the carnassial pair, the fourth upper may eat 50±60% meat with vegetable matter premolar and ®rst lower molar, which in this and invertebrates making up the remainder of group have been modi®ed as shearing blades the diet. Ecological specialization to hypercar- for effective slicing of meat. Although the nivory is associated morphologically with shearing carnassials are a synapomorphy for speci®c changes in the skull and dentition that this group, members of Carnivora, hereafter include a relative lengthening of the shearing called carnivorans, have diversi®ed to occupy edges, composed of the trigon of the upper a wide range of ecological niches, and include fourth premolar and the trigonid of the lower highly carnivorous clades such as cats (Feli- ®rst molar, and reduction or loss of the po- dae) and weasels and martens (Mustelidae), stcarnassial dentition, the second and third generalists like the dogs and foxes (Canidae), lower molars and ®rst and second upper mo- insectivores like the mongoose (Herpestidae), lars, teeth used for chewing or grinding food omnivores like the bears (Ursidae) and rac- (Van Valkenburgh 1989; Hunt 1998). The facial 110 JILL A. HOLLIDAY AND SCOTT J. STEPPAN portion of the skull frequently shortens as 1982; Werdelin 1983; Van Valkenburgh 1991) well, an alteration thought related to main- or body-size correlates (Van Valkenburgh taining high bite force (Van Valkenburgh and 1990; Gittleman and Purvis 1998; Gardezi and Ruff 1987; Radinsky 1981a,b; Biknevicius and da Silva 1999). Van Valkenburgh 1996). Although the absence There are, of course, various reasons why of dietary data for many fossil taxa suggests any particular clade might not exhibit certain that the term ``hypercarnivore-morph'' may morphologies, including lack of genetic vari- be more appropriate, in this paper those taxa ation, functional constraint, stabilizing selec- with morphological characteristics consistent tion, or competition (Smith et al. 1985; Brooks with a hypercarnivorous diet will be called and McLennan 1991). Additional
Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Functional Morphology in the Cranial and Cervical Skeleton of the Sabre-Toothed Cat Paramachairodus Ogygia (Kaup, 1832) (Felidae
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2005? 2005 1443 363377 Original Article FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF P. OGYGIAM. J. SALESA ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 144, 363–377. With 11 figures Aspects of the functional morphology in the cranial and cervical skeleton of the sabre-toothed cat Paramachairodus ogygia (Kaup, 1832) (Felidae, Machairodontinae) from the Late Miocene of Spain: Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/144/3/363/2627519 by guest on 18 May 2020 implications for the origins of the machairodont killing bite MANUEL J. SALESA1*, MAURICIO ANTÓN2, ALAN TURNER1 and JORGE MORALES2 1School of Biological & Earth Sciences, Byrom Street, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK 2Departamento de Palaeobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2. 28006 Madrid, Spain Received January 2004; accepted for publication March 2005 The skull and cervical anatomy of the sabre-toothed felid Paramachairodus ogygia (Kaup, 1832) is described in this paper, with special attention paid to its functional morphology. Because of the scarcity of fossil remains, the anatomy of this felid has been very poorly known. However, the recently discovered Miocene carnivore trap of Batallones-1, near Madrid, Spain, has yielded almost complete skeletons of this animal, which is now one of the best known machairodontines. Consequently, the machairodont adaptations of this primitive sabre-toothed felid can be assessed for the first time. Some characters, such as the morphology of the mastoid area, reveal an intermediate state between that of felines and machairodontines, while others, such as the flattened upper canines and verticalized mandibular symphysis, show clear machairodont affinities.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivora from the Late Miocene Love Bone Bed of Florida
    Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. (2005) 45(4): 413-434 413 CARNIVORA FROM THE LATE MIOCENE LOVE BONE BED OF FLORIDA Jon A. Baskin1 Eleven genera and twelve species of Carnivora are known from the late Miocene Love Bone Bed Local Fauna, Alachua County, Florida. Taxa from there described in detail for the first time include the canid cf. Urocyon sp., the hemicyonine ursid cf. Plithocyon sp., and the mustelids Leptarctus webbi n. sp., Hoplictis sp., and ?Sthenictis near ?S. lacota. Postcrania of the nimravid Barbourofelis indicate that it had a subdigitigrade posture and most likely stalked and ambushed its prey in dense cover. The postcranial morphology of Nimravides (Felidae) is most similar to the jaguar, Panthera onca. The carnivorans strongly support a latest Clarendonian age assignment for the Love Bone Bed. Although the Love Bone Bed local fauna does show some evidence of endemism at the species level, it demonstrates that by the late Clarendonian, Florida had become part of the Clarendonian chronofauna of the midcontinent, in contrast to the higher endemism present in the early Miocene and in the later Miocene and Pliocene of Florida. Key Words: Carnivora; Miocene; Clarendonian; Florida; Love Bone Bed; Leptarctus webbi n. sp. INTRODUCTION can Museum of Natural History, New York; F:AM, Frick The Love Bone Bed Local Fauna, Alachua County, fossil mammal collection, part of the AMNH; UF, Florida Florida, has produced the largest and most diverse late Museum of Natural History, University of Florida. Miocene vertebrate fauna known from eastern North All measurements are in millimeters. The follow- America, including 43 species of mammals (Webb et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivora, Mammalia) in the Blancan of North America
    THE PEARCE-SELLARDS Series NUMBER 19 THE GENUS DINOFELIS (CARNIVORA, MAMMALIA) IN THE BLANCAN OF NORTH AMERICA by BJORN KURTEN Submitted for publication May 30, 1972 TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM / 24TH & TRINITY / AUSTIN, TEXAS W. W. NEWCOMB, JR., DIRECTOR The Genus Dinofelis (Carnivora, Mammalia) in the Blancan of North America Bjorn Kurten* INTRODUCTION The Blanco fauna was described by Meade (1945), who created the new on a felid species Panthera palaeoonca , based skull and associated mandible. Comparing the new species with members of the genera Panthera and Felis, he concluded that it showed close affinity to the jaguar. This has been tenta- tively accepted by later workers (Savage, 1960). The species forms the basis for the record of the genus Panthera in the Blancan of North America. A restudy of the material in 1971 led to the discovery in the collections of the Texas Memorial Museum at the University of Texas at Austin, of an additional, better preserved specimen (an upper canine) which clearly did not belong to Panthera or Felis but showed close affinity to the genus Dino- felis which has hitherto only been recorded from the Old World. Checking back on the type skull and mandible, the reference to Dinofelis could be fully substantiated. I wish to express my gratitude to Drs. John A. Wilson and Ernest L. Lundelius, the University of Texas at Austin, for the opportunity to study collections in their care. The abbreviation TMM is used to signify collections of the Texas Memorial Museum, the University of Texas at Austin. These were formerly in the collections of the Bureau of Economic Geology and in previous reports bore the prefix BEG.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEW SABER-TOOTHED CAT from NEBRASKA Erwin H
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Conservation and Survey Division Natural Resources, School of 1915 A NEW SABER-TOOTHED CAT FROM NEBRASKA Erwin H. Barbour Nebraska Geological Survey Harold J. Cook Nebraska Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/conservationsurvey Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Hydrology Commons, Paleontology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Barbour, Erwin H. and Cook, Harold J., "A NEW SABER-TOOTHED CAT FROM NEBRASKA" (1915). Conservation and Survey Division. 649. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/conservationsurvey/649 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Conservation and Survey Division by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 36c NEBRASKA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ERWIN HINCKLEY BARBOUR, State Geologist VOLUME 4 PART 17 A NEW SABER-TOOTHED CAT FROM NEBRASKA BY ERWIN H. BARBOUR AND HAROLD J. COOK GEOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS OF HON. CHARLES H. MORRILL 208 B A NEW SABER-TOOTHED CAT FROM NEBRASKA BY ERWIN H. BARBOUR AND HAROLD J, COOK During the field season of 1913, while exploring the Pliocene beds of Brown County, Mr. A. C. \Vhitford, a Fellow in the Department of Geology, University of Nebraska, discovered the mandible of a new mach.erodont cat. His work in this region was in the interest of the ~ebraska Geological Survey and the Morrill Geological Expeditions.1 The known fossil remains of the ancestral Felid.e fall into two nat­ ural lines of descent, as pointed out by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia, Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae) from the Earliest Hemphillian Screw Bean Local Fauna, Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas
    Chapter 9 Carnivora (Mammalia, Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae) From the Earliest Hemphillian Screw Bean Local Fauna, Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas MARGARET SKEELS STEVENS1 AND JAMES BOWIE STEVENS2 ABSTRACT The Screw Bean Local Fauna is the earliest Hemphillian fauna of the southwestern United States. The fossil remains occur in all parts of the informal Banta Shut-in formation, nowhere very fossiliferous. The formation is informally subdivided on the basis of stepwise ®ning and slowing deposition into Lower (least fossiliferous), Middle, and Red clay members, succeeded by the valley-®lling, Bench member (most fossiliferous). Identi®ed Carnivora include: cf. Pseudaelurus sp. and cf. Nimravides catocopis, medium and large extinct cats; Epicyon haydeni, large borophagine dog; Vulpes sp., small fox; cf. Eucyon sp., extinct primitive canine; Buisnictis chisoensis, n. sp., extinct skunk; and Martes sp., marten. B. chisoensis may be allied with Spilogale on the basis of mastoid specialization. Some of the Screw Bean taxa are late survivors of the Clarendonian Chronofauna, which extended through most or all of the early Hemphillian. The early early Hemphillian, late Miocene age attributed to the fauna is based on the Screw Bean assemblage postdating or- eodont and predating North American edentate occurrences, on lack of de®ning Hemphillian taxa, and on stage of evolution. INTRODUCTION southwestern North America, and ®ll a pa- leobiogeographic gap. In Trans-Pecos Texas NAMING AND IMPORTANCE OF THE SCREW and adjacent Chihuahua and Coahuila, Mex- BEAN LOCAL FAUNA: The name ``Screw Bean ico, they provide an age determination for Local Fauna,'' Banta Shut-in formation, postvolcanic (,18±20 Ma; Henry et al., Trans-Pecos Texas (®g.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Drimolen Crania Indicate Contemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Early Homo Erectus in S
    Submitted Manuscript: Confidential Title: Drimolen crania indicate contemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus and early Homo erectus in S. Africa Authors: Andy I.R. Herries1,2*†, Jesse M. Martin1†, A.B. Leece1†, Justin W. Adams3,2†, Giovanni Boschian4,2†, Renaud Joannes-Boyau5,2, Tara R. Edwards1, Tom Mallett1, Jason Massey3,6, Ashleigh Murszewski1, Simon Neuebauer7, Robyn Pickering8.9, David Strait10,2, Brian J. Armstrong2, Stephanie Baker2, Matthew V. Caruana2, Tim Denham11, John Hellstrom12, Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi13, Simon Mokobane2, Paul Penzo-Kajewski1, Douglass S. Rovinsky3, Gary T. Schwartz14, Rhiannon C. Stammers1, Coen Wilson1, Jon Woodhead12, Colin Menter13 Affiliations: 1. Palaeoscience Labs, Dept. Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3086, VIC, Australia. 2. Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. 3. Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, VIC, Australia. 4. Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Italy 5. Geoarchaeology and Archaeometry Research Group (GARG), Southern Cross University, Military Rd, Lismore, 2480, NSW, Australia 6. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, USA 7. Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany. 8. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 9. Human Evolution Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 10. Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA 11. Geoarchaeology Research Group, School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia 12. Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia 13. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Italy 14. Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • (Barbourofelinae, Nimravidae, Carnivora), from the Middle Miocene of China Suggests Barbourofelines Are Nimravids, Not Felids
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title A new genus and species of sabretooth, Oriensmilus liupanensis (Barbourofelinae, Nimravidae, Carnivora), from the middle Miocene of China suggests barbourofelines are nimravids, not felids Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0g62362j Journal JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY, 18(9) ISSN 1477-2019 Authors Wang, Xiaoming White, Stuart C Guan, Jian Publication Date 2020-05-02 DOI 10.1080/14772019.2019.1691066 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Systematic Palaeontology ISSN: 1477-2019 (Print) 1478-0941 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjsp20 A new genus and species of sabretooth, Oriensmilus liupanensis (Barbourofelinae, Nimravidae, Carnivora), from the middle Miocene of China suggests barbourofelines are nimravids, not felids Xiaoming Wang, Stuart C. White & Jian Guan To cite this article: Xiaoming Wang, Stuart C. White & Jian Guan (2020): A new genus and species of sabretooth, Oriensmilusliupanensis (Barbourofelinae, Nimravidae, Carnivora), from the middle Miocene of China suggests barbourofelines are nimravids, not felids , Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2019.1691066 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2019.1691066 View supplementary material Published online: 08 Jan 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjsp20 Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2020 Vol. 0, No. 0, 1–21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2019.1691066 A new genus and species of sabretooth, Oriensmilus liupanensis (Barbourofelinae, Nimravidae, Carnivora), from the middle Miocene of China suggests barbourofelines are nimravids, not felids a,bà c d Xiaoming Wang , Stuart C.
    [Show full text]
  • O Ssakach Drapieżnych – Część 2 - Kotokształtne
    PAN Muzeum Ziemi – O ssakach drapieżnych – część 2 - kotokształtne O ssakach drapieżnych - część 2 - kotokształtne W niniejszym artykule przyjrzymy się ewolucji i zróżnicowaniu zwierząt reprezentujących jedną z dwóch głównych gałęzi ewolucyjnych w obrębie drapieżnych (Carnivora). Na wczesnym etapie ewolucji, drapieżne podzieliły się (ryc. 1) na psokształtne (Caniformia) oraz kotokształtne (Feliformia). Paradoksalnie, w obydwu grupach występują (bądź występowały w przeszłości) formy, które bardziej przypominają psy, bądź bardziej przypominają koty. Ryc. 1. Uproszczone drzewo pokrewieństw ewolucyjnych współczesnych grup drapieżnych (Carnivora). Ryc. Michał Loba, na podstawie Nyakatura i Bininda-Emonds, 2012. Tym, co w rzeczywistości dzieli te dwie grupy na poziomie anatomicznym jest budowa komory ucha środkowego (bulla tympanica, łac.; ryc. 2). U drapieżnych komora ta jest budowa przede wszystkim przez dwie kości – tylną kaudalną kość entotympaniczną i kość ektotympaniczną. U kotokształtnych, w miejscu ich spotkania się ze sobą powstaje ciągła przegroda. Obydwie części komory kontaktują się ze sobą tylko za pośrednictwem małego okienka. U psokształtnych 1 PAN Muzeum Ziemi – O ssakach drapieżnych – część 2 - kotokształtne Ryc. 2. Widziane od spodu czaszki: A. baribala (Ursus americanus, Ursidae, Caniformia), B. żenety zwyczajnej (Genetta genetta, Viverridae, Feliformia). Strzałkami zaznaczono komorę ucha środkowego u niedźwiedzia i miejsce występowania przegrody w komorze żenety. Zdj. (A, B) Phil Myers, Animal Diversity Web (CC BY-NC-SA
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoecological Comparison Between Late Miocene Localities of China and Greece Based on Hipparion Faunas
    Paleoecological comparison between late Miocene localities of China and Greece based on Hipparion faunas Tao DENG Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044 (China) [email protected] Deng T. 2006. — Paleoecological comparison between late Miocene localities of China and Greece based on Hipparion faunas. Geodiversitas 28 (3) : 499-516. ABSTRACT Both China and Greece have abundant fossils of the late Miocene Hipparion fauna. Th e habitat of the Hipparion fauna in Greece was a sclerophyllous ever- green woodland. Th e Chinese late Miocene Hipparion fauna is represented respectively in the Guonigou fauna (MN 9), the Dashengou fauna (MN 10), and the Yangjiashan fauna (MN 11) from Linxia, Gansu, and the Baode fauna (MN 12) from Baode, Shanxi. According to the evidence from lithology, carbon isotopes, paleobotany, taxonomic framework, mammalian diversity and faunal similarity, the paleoenvironment of the Hipparion fauna in China was a subarid open steppe, which is diff erent from that of Greece. Th e red clay bearing the Hipparion fauna in China is windblown in origin, i.e. eolian deposits. Stable carbon isotopes from tooth enamel and paleosols indicate that C3 plants domi- nated the vegetation during the late Miocene in China. Pollens of xerophilous and sub-xerophilous grasses show a signal of steppe or dry grassland. Forest mammals, such as primates and chalicotheres, are absent or scarce, but grass- land mammals, such as horses and rhinoceroses, are abundant in the Chinese Hipparion fauna. Th e species richness of China and Greece exhibits a similar KEY WORDS trend with a clear increase from MN 9 to MN 12, but the two regions have Hipparion fauna, low similarities at the species level.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    UNDERSTANDING CARNIVORAN ECOMORPHOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME, WITH A CASE STUDY DURING THE CAT-GAP OF FLORIDA By SHARON ELIZABETH HOLTE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Sharon Elizabeth Holte To Dr. Larry, thank you ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my family for encouraging me to pursue my interests. They have always believed in me and never doubted that I would reach my goals. I am eternally grateful to my mentors, Dr. Jim Mead and the late Dr. Larry Agenbroad, who have shaped me as a paleontologist and have provided me to the strength and knowledge to continue to grow as a scientist. I would like to thank my colleagues from the Florida Museum of Natural History who provided insight and open discussion on my research. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Aldo Rincon for his help in researching procyonids. I am so grateful to Dr. Anne-Claire Fabre; without her understanding of R and knowledge of 3D morphometrics this project would have been an immense struggle. I would also to thank Rachel Short for the late-night work sessions and discussions. I am extremely grateful to my advisor Dr. David Steadman for his comments, feedback, and guidance through my time here at the University of Florida. I also thank my committee, Dr. Bruce MacFadden, Dr. Jon Bloch, Dr. Elizabeth Screaton, for their feedback and encouragement. I am grateful to the geosciences department at East Tennessee State University, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard for the loans of specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • SMC 11 Gill 1.Pdf
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS. 230 ARRANGEMENT FAMILIES OF MAMMALS. WITH ANALYTICAL TABLES. PREPARED FOR THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. BY THEODORE GILL, M.D., Ph.D. WASHINGTON: PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. NOVEMBER, 1872. ADVERTISEMENT. The following list of families of Mammals, with analytical tables, has been prepared by Dr. Theodore Gill, at the request of the Smithsonian Institution, to serve as a basis for the arrangement of the collection of Mammals in the National Museum ; and as frequent applications for such a list have been received by the Institution, it has been thought advisable to publish it for more extended use. In provisionally adopting this system for the purpose mentioned, the Institution, in accordance with its custom, disclaims all responsibility for any of the hypothetical views upon which it may be based. JOSEPH HENRY, Secretary, S. I. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, October, 1872. (iii) CONTENTS. I. List of Families* (including references to synoptical tables) 1-27 Sub-Class (Eutheria) Placentalia s. Monodelpbia (1-121) 1, Super-Order Educabilia (1-73) Order 1. Primates (1-8) Sub-Order Anthropoidea (1-5) " Prosimiae (6-8) Order 2. Ferae (9-27) Sub-Order Fissipedia (9-24) . " Pinnipedia (25-27) Order 3. Ungulata (28-54) Sub-Order Artiodactyli (28-45) " Perissodactyli (46-54) Order 4. Toxodontia (55-56) . Order 5. Hyracoidea (57) Order 6. Proboscidea (58-59) Diverging (Educabilian) series. Order 7. Sirenia' (60-63) Order 8. Cete (64-73) . Sub-Order Zeuglodontia (64-65) " Denticete (66-71) . Mysticete (72-73) . Super-Order Ineducabilia (74-121) Order 9. Chiroptera (74-82) . Sub-Order Aniinalivora (74-81) " Frugivora (82) Order 10.
    [Show full text]