DTM PPT Presentation-Round 18 Copy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX THE IDP SITUATION IN NORTHEAST NIGERIA DTM ROUND XVIII August, 2017 (ADAMAWA, BORNO, BAUCHI, GOMBE, TARABA, YOBE) T D M IOM OIM Displacement Tracking in North-East Nigeria IOM Project Overview OBJECTIVE The primary objec�ve of the program is to support the Government of Nigeria in establishing a comprehensive system to collect and disseminate data on IDPs building and strengthening the capacity of NEMA, SEMA and other partners in the field to undertake IDP assessments in a unified and systema�zed manner that provides reliable informa�on on the current IDP situa�on. BENEFITS The informa�on collected will contribute to the provision of a comprehensive profile of the IDP popula�on in North East Nigeria which will be shared with all relevant stakeholders and will be used by the government and humanitarian partners to protect, assist and advocate on behalf of the IDP popula�on. DT M Methodology Internal Displacement Tracking and Monitoring Systems based on IOM DTM model Implementation Support for NEMA and SEMAs Baseline Displacement Assessment IDP Site Assessment Registra�on/Bio-Metrics - LGA and WARD Level In all Local Government Areas (LGAs) of In camps, camp-like se�ngs In camps, camp-like se�ngs and host communi�es Abadam Lake Chad thirteen states: Adamawa, Bauchi, Benue, Niger Borno, Fct, Gombe, Kaduna, Kano, Nasarawa, Katsina Yobe Plateau, Taraba, Yobe, and Zamfara. 12% Marte Jigawa Abadam Lake Chad Yusufari Kukawa Niger Yunusari Mobbar 88% Borno Machina Karasuwa Nguru Guzamala Kano 46% Barde Borsari Geidam Gubio Monguno Jigawa Jakusko Borno Nganzai Marte Tarmua Ngala Yobe Magumeri ZakiGamawa Mafa Dikwa 54% Itas/Gadau KondugaJere Kala-Balge Nangere Fune Damaturu Maiduguri Jama'AreKatagum Potiskum Gombe Damban Kaga 100% Kano Konduga Bama Shira Misau Gujba Giade Fika Darazo Warji Damboa Gwoza Bauchi Ningi Nafada Gulani Cameroon Chibok 100% Biu Madagali Ganjuwa Dukku Funakaye Gombe Askira-Uba Michika Adamawa Kwami Kwaya KusarHawul Toro Kirfi Bayo HongMubi North Bauchi Yamaltu/ Deba Bauchi Shani Gombi Mubi South Akko 7% ± Dass Alkaleri Kaltungo Shelleng Cameroon Tafawa-Balewa Billiri BalangaGuyuk Song Maiha Plateau 93% Shomgom Bogoro Larmurde Adamawa Numan Girei Karim Lamido DemsaYola North Plateau Lau Yola South ± Mayo-BelwaFufore JalingoYorroZing Ardo-Kola Jada Nassarawa 12% IDPs in Camps & Gassol Camp-like settings Ganye Nasarawa Ibi 88% IDPs with Host Bali Communities Wukari Teungo Taraba Inaccessible area Inaccessible areas Donga IDPs_Severity Taraba Gashaka Less than 1,000 Benue IDPs Benue Takum Kurmi 1,001 - 5,000 Less than 30,000 Ussa 5,001 - 10,000 30,001 - 60,000 Sardauna 10,001 - 50,000 60,001 - 120,000 0 35 70 140 Km More than 50,000 Cross River 0 40 80 160 Km More than120,000 Data is collected via interviews with key informants such as representa�ves of the administra�on, community leaders, religious leaders, and humanitarian aid workers. To ensure data accuracy, assessments are conducted and cross checked with various key informant. The accuracy of the data also relies on the regularity of the assessments and field visits that are conducted every six weeks. Stang and Resources IOM Data Collectors Staff from NEMA/SEMA and Nigerian Red Cross Society (NRCS) The DTM assessment teams include representatives from NEMA, SEMAs, the Nigerian Red Cross, and IOM. IOM’s pioneering programme is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Oce (ECHO), and the Government of Germany. NEMA also provides nancial support. DT M DTM Round XVIII KEY HIGHLIGHTS 1,757,288 Number of IDPs per round Covered states Displaced individuals 2,500,000 ADAMAWA 1,268,140 2,000,000 Returnee individuals BORNO 1,500,000 56% 1,000,000 GOMBE of the IDP population are children (0 - 18 Years) 500,000 YOBE - 5 7 6 5 4 7 6 5 5 5 7 7 6 6 6 7 5 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t t r r r c c c y g g g b b n n n n c c a p 322,931 p e e e a u u u a e e u u u J J J J O O A A F F D D D A A A M Displaced households M BAUCHI I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII TARABA 200,786 Returnee households Assessment in Borno (most aected state) 54% 2 Yet to reach LGAs of the IDP population are female 27 Assessed LGAs LGAs in Borno 25 DT M Change in IDP gures by state Round XVII Total Round XVIII Total State (June 2017) (August 2017) Change ADAMAWA 140,875 139,362 -1,513 BAUCHI 56,359 55,611 -748 BORNO 1,439,940 1,373,564 -66,376 GOMBE 27,985 27,339 -646 TARABA 52,961 54,676 +1,715 YOBE 107,201 106,736 -465 Total 1,825,321 1,757,288 -68,033 Borno: Despite the reduc�on in Borno, the state con�nues to host the highest number of IDPs in Nigeria. Within Borno, the biggest reduc�on was recorded in Maiduguri M.C. which saw an 11 per cent decrease in the number of IDPs against the previous round. 36,975 IDPs le� Maiduguri M.C. for Damboa, Dikwa, Gwoza, Kala Balge, Kukawa, Mafa, Mobbar, Monguno and Ngala. DT M M Demographic Data 60+ 3.79% 3.68% A detailed and representa�ve 18-59 17.14% y 19.93% r o sample of age and gender g e t 12.90% a 6-17 c 14.85% breakdown was obtained by e g A interviewing a sample 1-5 8.46% 10.72% represen�ng four per cent of less than 1 3.83% the iden�fied IDP popula�on. 4.71% The results are depicted in % popula�on by gender figure 4 and 5. The average Male Female household size consisted of five persons. Male, 46% Female, 54% ADAMAWA 3% 97% Cause of displacement BAUCHI 38% 62% The percentages and reasons for displacement remained BORNO 100% more or less unchanged over �me. Insurgency was the GOMBE 100% leading cause of displacement in all states except Taraba TARABA 75% 22% 2% where community clashes accounted for 75 per cent of YOBE 100% displacements. All the displacements in Borno, Gombe Community clashes Insurgency Natural disasters and Yobe were due to the ongoing conflict. YEAR OF DISPLACEMENT Taraba and Borno, in that order, con�nue to have high ADAMAWA 31% 38% 23% 8% number of displacements in 2017 as well. In Borno, the BAUCHI 27% 38% 29% 5%1% 1)Before 2014 percentage of peopled displaced so far in 2017 went up to 2)2014 BORNO 27% 28% 31% 14% 15 per cent from 12 per cent (as per Round XVII, June). 3)2015 GOMBE 5% 43% 29% 21% 2% 4)2016 TARABA 4% 45% 19% 14% 18% 5)2017 29% YOBE 46% 17% 31% 6% M Type of IDP dwellings While majority of IDPs con�nue to reside with host com- muni�es, Borno has almost as many IDPs living with host communi�es as in camps (figure 11 and 12). Dwelling type of IDPs Dwelling type by state ADAMAWA 93% 7% Camp BAUCHI 100% 37% GOMBE 100% Host Community TARABA 88% 12% 63% YOBE 88% 12% BORNO 54% 46% Unmet needs Food con�nues to be the main unmet need in IDP se�lements (figure 14) and the need for food has been steadily increasing (figure 13). Main unmet needs (Round 17) Main unmet needs (Round 18) Food 68% Food 72% NFI 15% NFI 12% Shelter 7% Shelter 8% Medical services 5% Medical services 4% Drinking water 2% Drinking water Sanita�on and Hygiene 1% 1% Water for washing and cooking 1% Water for washing and cooking 1% Security 1% Sanita�on and Hygiene 1% Security 1% 15.5% Return assessment The trend of increasing numbers of returnees con�nued in DTM Round XVIII assessment. A nominal increase of one per cent was recorded in the number of returnees (from 1,257,911 to 1,268,140) during Round XVII in June 2017. The increase was in-line with the increasing trend since DTM started recording data on returnees in October 2015. Number of returnees by state (Round XVI vs Round XVIII) Round XVII Total Round XVIII Total State (June 2017) (August 2017) Change Adamawa 666,0 7 7 666,802 725 Borno 504,0 1 6 511,598 7,582 Yobe 87,8 1 8 89,747 1,929 Trend of population return Total 1,257,9 1 1 1,268,140 10,229 0 1 4 4 1 9 7 1 9 9 8 , 2 , , 1 0 8 4 7 4 , 8 5 6 5 , 3 1 4 2 2 , 9 2 , 5 , 5 , 6 9 1 1 1 5 1 , 2 0 , 9 1 0 , , 1 5 0 1 4 8 1 6 4 9 , 1 , 3 4 9 3 6 5 2 4 9 3 6 6 2 , 2 5 3 3 , , 9 3 , 2 0 8 2 3 2 3 6 3 3 2 7 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 5 7 6 6 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - t t r r c c y g g n b n n c c a p e e a u u a e u u J J J O O A F D D A A M M VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII Site assessment DTM Round XVIII site assessments were conducted in 2,175 sites, involving a popula�on of 1,757,288 people (322,931 households).