A Century of Rural Change in Northeastern Transylvania: Corbu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Century of Rural Change in Northeastern Transylvania: Corbu pzc GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA No6; p 29-37 gheni) comprised the Tulghes ‘plasa’ (or district) within Ciuc county, while the A Century of Rural Change larger depression to the west was divided between the Gheorgheni and Toplita districts (in Ciuc and Mures-Turda coun- in Northeastern Transylvania: ties respectively). But the Tulghes district was subsequently split between these Corbu and its Region two and this arrangement persisted into the communist period when Toplita district (now labelled a ‘raion’) included Bilbor, Borsec, Corbu, Galautas, Sarmas and Subcetate (Pufulete & Dumitrescu Muica, N.* & Turnock, D.** 1983); while Gheorgheni district included Ditrau, Lazarea, Remetea and Tulghes Abstract This is a study of a rural com- orbu is a Transylvanian village - all within the Hungarian Autonomous mune in the northeast of Transylvania in the Eastern Carpathians, Region based on Targu Mures. These which has attracted geographical on Clocated close to the border with arrangements gave way to the present several occasions during the last century Moldavia at an altitude of some 700m in situation in 1968 when districts were in such a way as to provide in-depth the Bistricioara valley (a tributary of the eliminated and counties restored: now perspectives on the progress of develop- Bistrita). Although it lies on the main the entire district comprises the north- ment in the context of a frontier region at road connecting Cluj-Napoca with Iasi ernmost part of Harghita county, with a the contact of Hungarian and Romanian (via Reghin, Toplita and Targu Neamt), large Hungarian majority, but it also lies settlement. Although private farming has the locality rather isolated by the lack of on the northeasterly limit of the territory persisted without the upheaval of collec- direct links northwards towards Bistrita where the Secui population mingled with tivisation, the area has been marginalised and Vatra Dornei. Moreover in this area Romanian pastoralists in the Medieval and continues to lose population with lies on Transylvania’s frontier with Mol- period and there is still a mixed Hungar- only limited prospects for diversifica- davia - historically separating the former ian-Romanian population. There are Ro- tion. But the community is both stable Habsburg and Ottoman Empires - with manian majorities in Bilbor, Corbu and and sustainable and, lying at the centre much evidence of military activity dur- Tulghes in the Bistricioara Valley and in of a scattered Romanian population in ing the First World War when the Central Galautas, Sarmas, Subcetate and Toplita the Bistricioara Valley, could expand Powers were trying to break through into in the Gheorgheni depression; with Hun- its cultural role into light industry to the then Romanian kingdom. However garian majorities elsewhere. complement the tourism in the nearby the boundary does not follow the prin- The long-term population trend shows Hungarian town of Borsec. cipal watershed lying to west, so that a transfer from rural areas to the three the partially-modernised roads into the towns of Borsec, Gheorgheni and Toplita upper Bistricioara from the Gheorgheni (Table 1). But data for 1966 and 1992 shows Depression (e.g. from Ditrau to Borsec growth in several commune centres - Bil- and Tulghes negotiate high passes (at bor, Ditrau, Galautas, Remetea, Sarmas 1259m and 1025m respectively), as does and Subcetate (and in these communes the main road already referred to (at the overall except for Subcetate). In terms of Borsec/Creanga pass: 1105m) and another ethnic balance only the town of Toplita modernised from Gheorgheni to Piatra and the villages of Galautas and Lacu Neamt (Bicaz Pass: 1256m) (Pisota et al. Rosu have changed from a Hungarian 1976). In geological terms there a contact majority in 1966 to a Romanian majority between the eruptive and crystalline-me- in 1992, but the Hungarian population sozoic rocks of the Eastern Carpathians has declined relatively in the majority and there is some rare vegetation on the of villages (and especially in the towns), southern flanks of the Bistrita Mountains, although Ditrau, Lazarea and Remetea including the limestone massif of Pietrele (and the towns of Borsec and Gheorghe- Rosii (Ghinea 1998 p.3-316). But there is a ni) are confirmed as Hungarian bastions tradition of unity through the Hungarian (Table 2). Natural increase among the district name ‘Gyergyo’ (lacking an exact Romanians has probably been greater: in- equivalent in Romanian) which is com- deed, Table 3 shows natural decrease for monly used as a prefix to the Hungar- 1998-2000 in all Hungarian majority areas ian names for the principal settlements whereas the balance is positive in all the * Nicolae Muica, Geography Institute, Str. (Figure 1). predominantly Romanian areas except Dimitrie Racovita 12, 70307 Bucuresti 20, When Romanian administration Corbu and Subcetate. But there would Romania began after the First World War the also appear to have been some consolida- ** David Turnock, Geography Depart- upper Bistricioara (Bilbor, Borsec, Corbu, tion of the Hungarian population given ment, The University, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom Tulghes and the Bicaz area of Gheor- the absolute growth in Ditrau and Reme- 29 GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA pzc Figure 1 The ‘Gyergyo’ region of northeastern Transylvania. Note that the essentials of the river system my be inferred from the road system and especially the highlighting of watershed sections for forest roads. tea communes (as well as the towns) and the substantial decline in many other Corbu and its and Region Corbu places. However this phenomenon needs further research in conjunction with the rural planning strategy for Harghita dur- ing the communist period. Table 3 shows a positive migration balance in terms of permanent residence (domicile) in Laza- rea and Remetea (also Subcetate) during 1998-2000 which even the three towns cannot match. Migration for temporary residence is positive in Borsec and Gheo- rgheni and in the industrial zone of Ga- lautas-Sarmas. However, it is interesting to see that when the census returns for 1992 are compared with the data on reli- gion in 1857 (when the Romanians would A Century of Rural Change in Northeastern Transylvania: Change Rural A Century of have been Orthodox or Uniate) there is a slight tendency towards polarisation over the 135 year period and a more consistent Romanian advance in the eastern part of the region than the west (Table 1). But while ethnic relations are an im- portant element in the geography, with an emphasis on peaceful coexistence (with mixed communities in most vil- lages and good neighbourly relations which extend to business partnerships), this study is motivated primarily by the data available from published field stud- ies carried out in 1933 and 1977 which help in building a perspective extending through the last century. The Romanian author has carried out fieldwork in recent years along with the UK author Table 1 Population trends by towns and communes 1857-1992 who organised the 1977 project - under Population Households Romanians1 Area2 the auspices of British ‘Geographical 1857 1880 1910 1930 1966 1992 1930 1992 1857 1992 1977 Field Group’ (Turnock et al. 1980) - and Borsec 542 1416 1862 2166 2750 3074 1103 1133 12.4 19.8 8.75 subsequently researched the earlier pro- Gheorgheni 5539 5503 8905 10355 13828 21433 5376 7149 1.7 10.6 22.27 gramme organised by the Le Play Soci- Toplita 3117 4276 7388 8314 10993 17212 2075 5270 83.9 69.2 33.97 ety (Fleure & Pelham 1936). Pastoralism Bilbor 696 996 1351 1670 2732 2930 402 782 92.4 97.4 22.73 is dominant, for the upper Bistricioara is Corbu 902 1146 1396 1571 2125 1622 362 579 80.5 84.4 14.05 close to the limits of cultivation - with Ditrau 4404 5420 6144 6785 6476 6772 1561 2270 6.7 3 11.45 agriculture severely constrained by Galautas 7573 9713 12543 1591 2509 2771 389 829 88.5 72.1 2.94 relief as well as climate and necessarily Lazarea 2728 3216 4753 4889 4454 3727 1337 1157 3.1 1.2 8.09 limited largely to maize and potatoes Remetea 3316 4252 6207 6796 5830 6582 2251 1585 1.0 0.5 10.60 (the average annual temperature at Sarmas 1109 1123 1597 2066 4026 4283 477 1403 88.5 77.7 7.01 Bilbor - at the head of the Bistricioara Subcetate 8923 11413 14753 2297 2667 2347 578 759 98.2 94.7 5.11 - is 4deg.C (14deg in July and -6deg in Tulghes 1651 2501 3879 3883 4663 3780 872 686 44.2 64.3 22.67 January). This typical Carpathian valley Total 25653 31961 46211 52383 63053 76533 16783 23602 30.5 38.0 169.64 system contrasts with the extensive flat- 1 Percentage of the total population: 1857 by religion and 1992 by nationality; 2 thousand ha; 3 Until floored depressions threaded by Mures 1930 Galautas was included in Subcetate. The Geography Institute estimated Galautas share of the and Olt rivers in the west of the district. 1910 population to be virtually 46% of the total andthis proportion has been applied to the 1853 and And, links across to old frontier to Piatra 1880 figures; Note that Joseni (shown in Figure 1) is not coverd by the statistics Source: Census Reports (re-issued in the case of 1857 and 1880) Neamt notwithstanding, it is here where 30 pzc GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA Turnock, D. Turnock, N.Muica, the principal markets and opportunities Table 2 Population in the towns, communes and principal villages 1966/92 for non-agricultural employment lie; Town / 1966 1992 Percentage 1966 - Ratio with the completion of the railway arc Commune and change Village Total A B C Total A B C 1992 1966 1992 Brasov-Miercurea Ciuc-Toplita-Reghin- BORSEC 2750 364 2375 11 3074 609 2451 14 +11.8 6.50 4.00 Targu Mures-Turda in 1909 an important GHEORGHENI 13828 956 12765 107 21433 2265 18946 222 +55.0 13.40 8.40 benchmark for economic diversification.
Recommended publications
  • Autorizatii 2007.Pdf
    Adresa/denumirea construcţiei pentru Denumirea titularului Nr. crt. Număr autorizaţie de securitate la incendiu care a fost emisă autorizaţia de autorizaţiei securitate la incendiu Lăcaşs de cult, Mun. Odorheiu Secuiesc, 1 din 08.01.2007 MARTORII LUI IEHOVA 1 str. Lăcătuşilor, nr. F.N S.C. REWE Magazin PENNY, Mun. Miercurea Ciuc, str. 2 din 15.01.2007 PROJEKTENTWICKLUNG Braşovului, nr. F.N 2 ROMANIA. S.R.L Depozit şi magazin materiale construcţii, 3 din 10.09.2007 S.C. APICOM S.R.L Mun. Miercurea Ciuc, str. Progresului, nr. 18 3 Pensiune turistică, Com. Zetea, sat 4 din 21.01.2007 S.C. NMU TURISM S.R.L 4 Subcetate, nr. F.N S.C. “PENSIUNEA Pensiune turistică, Loc. Vlăhiţa, str. 1 Mai, 5 din 05.02.2007 5 SZEPASSZONY” S.R.L nr. 10 Restaurant, Mun. Miercurea Ciuc, str. 6 din 12.02.2007 S.C. TAMGELER S.R.L 6 Petofi, nr. 35 Hală de depozitare, Mun. Odorheiu 7 din 05.03.2007 S.C. MAXOLL S.R.L 7 Secuiesc, str. Rakoczi ferenc, nr. 96 Pensiune turistică, Com. Satu mare, sat 8 din 05.03.2007 AI BOKOR CSABA 8 Pârâul Brădeşti, nr. 588 Pensiune turistică, Com. Praid, sat Praid, 9 din 12.03.2007 S.C. SEBELIN S.R.L 9 str. principală, nr. 605/F Hotel, Mun. Odorheiu Secuiesc, str. 10 din 12.03.2007 S.C. KLIMA S.R.L 10 Sântimbru, nr. 18 FUNDAŢIA SAPIENTIA Învăţământ, cazare, Mun. Miercurea Ciuc, 11 din 12. 03.2007 11 UNIVERSITATEA SAPIENTIA str. Libertăţii, nr. 1 Unitate de prelucrări metalice, Mun.
    [Show full text]
  • Asociația De Dezvoltare Intercomunitară „S.I.M.D.” Harghita Hargita Megyei „Integrált Hulladékgazdálkodási” Társulás Miercurea Ciuc, 530140, P-Ța Libertății Nr
    Asociația de Dezvoltare Intercomunitară „S.I.M.D.” Harghita Hargita Megyei „Integrált Hulladékgazdálkodási” Társulás Miercurea Ciuc, 530140, P-ța Libertății Nr. 5, Cam. 240, Tel.0266 207 700, Int.1705, C.I.F. 26134952 ANEXA la Hot. AGA nr. 6 din 2018 STATUTUL ACTUALIZAT Al Asociației de dezvoltare intercomunitară de utilități publice pentru serviciul de salubrizare a localităților Asociația de Dezvoltare Intercomunitară „S.I.M.D Harghita” PREAMBUL I. Asociații: 1. Județul Harghita, prin Consiliul Județean Harghita, cu sediul în municipiul Miercurea Ciuc, P-ța Libertății nr. 5, județul Harghita, cod fiscal: 4245763, reprezentat de vicepreședintele mandatat aflat în funcție; 2. Municipiul Miercurea Ciuc, prin Consiliul Local municipiului Miercurea Ciuc, cu sediul în municipiul Miercurea Ciuc, str. Cetății nr. 1, cod fiscal: 4245747, reprezentat de primarul/viceprimarul aflat în funcție; 3. Municipiul Gheorgheni, prin Consiliul Local al municipiului Gheorgheni, cu sediul în municipiul Gheorgheni. Str. Libertății nr. 27, cod fiscal: 4245070, reprezentat prin primarul/viceprimarul aflat în funcție; 4. Municipiul Toplița, prin Consiliul Local al municipiului Toplița, cu sediul în municipiul Toplița, Bulevardul Nicolae Bălcescu nr. 14, cod fiscal: 4245178, reprezentat prin primarul/viceprimarul aflat în funcție; 5. Orașul Băile Tușnad, prin consiliul Local al orașului Băile Tușnad, cu sediul în orașul Băile Tușnad, str. Oltului nr. 63, cod fiscal: 4245348, reprezentat prin primarul/viceprimarul aflat în funcție; 6. Orașul Bălan, prin Consiliul Local al orașului Bălan, cu sediul în orașul Bălan, str. 1 Decembrie nr. 25, cod fiscal: 4367612, reprezentat prin primarul/viceprimarul aflat în funcție; 7. Orașul Borsec, prin Consiliul Local al orașului Borsec, cu sediul în orașul Borsec, str.
    [Show full text]
  • Rata De Incidență Pe Localități (Actualizare: 22 Martie), Comunicată
    Rata de incidență pe localități (actualizare: 22 martie), comunicată de Centrul Național de Conducere și Coordonare a Intervenției (CNCCI judet uat infection_rate ALBA RIMETEA 13 ALBA ŞONA 10,53 ALBA DOŞTAT 7,84 ALBA UNIREA 6,89 ALBA CIUGUD 6,74 ALBA NOŞLAC 6,06 ALBA MUNICIPIUL AIUD 5,99 ALBA MUNICIPIUL ALBA IULIA 5,68 ALBA ORAŞ OCNA MUREŞ 5,44 ALBA RĂDEŞTI 4,65 ALBA MIHALŢ 4,31 ALBA LUNCA MUREŞULUI 4,26 ALBA GÂRBOVA 4,19 ALBA MIRĂSLĂU 4,04 ALBA GALDA DE JOS 4,03 ALBA CERU-BĂCĂINŢI 3,7 ALBA PIANU 3,63 ALBA ORAŞ ABRUD 3,62 ALBA STREMŢ 3,26 ALBA LOPADEA NOUĂ 3,09 ALBA MUNICIPIUL BLAJ 2,94 ALBA BUCIUM 2,81 ALBA SÂNCEL 2,69 ALBA MUNICIPIUL SEBEŞ 2,64 ALBA HOPÂRTA 2,6 ALBA CRICĂU 2,5 ALBA ŞUGAG 2,42 ALBA ŞPRING 2,29 ALBA ORAŞ CUGIR 2,22 ALBA ORAŞ CÂMPENI 2,18 ALBA BERGHIN 2,09 ALBA ORAŞ TEIUŞ 2,07 ALBA FĂRĂU 2,01 ALBA SÂNTIMBRU 1,98 ALBA CRĂCIUNELU DE JOS 1,87 ALBA IGHIU 1,85 ALBA ÎNTREGALDE 1,77 ALBA SĂSCIORI 1,69 ALBA LIVEZILE 1,65 ALBA ŞIBOT 1,65 ALBA PONOR 1,5 ALBA VINŢU DE JOS 1,45 ALBA SĂLCIUA 1,4 ALBA JIDVEI 1,32 ALBA SĂLIŞTEA 1,27 ALBA ORAŞ BAIA DE ARIEŞ 1,05 ALBA LUPŞA 1,02 ALBA CETATEA DE BALTĂ 0,98 ALBA VALEA LUNGĂ 0,95 ALBA BUCERDEA GRÂNOASĂ 0,88 ALBA VADU MOŢILOR 0,75 ALBA METEŞ 0,72 ALBA AVRAM IANCU 0,68 ALBA VIDRA 0,65 ALBA DAIA ROMÂNĂ 0,64 ALBA SCĂRIŞOARA 0,64 ALBA HOREA 0,51 ALBA ALBAC 0,5 ALBA ORAŞ ZLATNA 0,38 ALBA BISTRA 0,22 ALBA ALMAŞU MARE 0 ALBA ROŞIA MONTANĂ 0 ALBA CIURULEASA 0 ALBA POIANA VADULUI 0 ALBA ROŞIA DE SECAŞ 0 ALBA POŞAGA 0 ALBA CÂLNIC 0 ALBA OHABA 0 ALBA BLANDIANA 0 ALBA CERGĂU 0 ALBA CENADE 0 ALBA CUT 0
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Borsec Mineral Water Bottling
    STUDIA UBB GEOGRAPHIA, LIX, 1, 2014, pp. 165-176 (RECOMMENDED CITATION) THE HISTORY OF BORSEC MINERAL WATER BOTTLING G. B. TOFAN1 ABSTRACT. – The History of Borsec Mineral Water Bottling. The mineral water springs of Borsec have been known to exist since ancient times. It started as a legend, presented by Orbán Balász, who mentions an author named Salzer. In his „Voyage Diaries in Transylvania”, Salzer recounts the discovery of healing springs in the area, and attributes it, like many other authors, to a Romanian shepherd called Gheorghe, who, suffering from ulcer, returning home one day, drank from one of the Borsec springs. Drinking the sour water, he felt better. Consequently, he remained there for a couple of days, drinking water from the same spot and curing his ailment. Written documents date back from the 16th century, when Bethlen Farkas, in the historical novel „Historia”, recounts that, in 1594, Sigismund Bathory, who resided in Alba Iulia, suffered from nervous exhaustion. His Italian doctor, Bucello, who knew about the curing effects of the Borsec mineral waters, prescribed a treatment using the water from the „Lobogó” spring. The water, transported to the princely estate in large covered barrels, eventually healed Sigismund Bathory. It is easy to see why, at the end of the 16th century, the mineral water of Borsec, with its miracle properties, was well known in Transylvania and at the imperial court of Vienna. The above mentioned spring, used from the 19th century onwards, for spas and for bottling, earned great renown, especially due to the high concentration of CO2 (over 2.5 g/l).
    [Show full text]
  • Geosciences in the 21 Century______
    GEOSCIENCES IN THE 21st CENTURY Symposium dedicated to the 80th anniversary of professor Emil Constantinescu EXTENDED ABSTRACTS EDITORS Antoneta Seghedi, Gheorghe Ilinca, Victor Mocanu GeoEcoMar Bucharest, 2019 Organizatori: Sponsorul volumului: GEOSCIENCES IN THE 21ST CENTURY Symposium dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Professor Emil Constantinescu EXTENDED ABSTRACTS EDITORS Antoneta Seghedi, Gheorghe Ilinca, Victor Mocanu GeoEcoMar Bucharest 2019 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOECOLOGY – GeoEcoMar – ROMANIA 23-25 Dimitrie Onciul St. 024053 Bucharest Tel./Fax: +40-021-252 30 39 Contact: [email protected] Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Geosciences in the 21st century / editors: Antoneta Seghedi, Victor Mocanu, Gheorghe Ilinca. - Bucureşti : GeoEcoMar, 2019 Conţine bibliografie ISBN 978-606-94742-7-3 I. Seghedi, Antoneta (ed.) II. Mocanu, Victor (ed.) III. Ilinca, Gheorghe (ed.) 55 Cover: Nicoleta Aniţăi © GeoEcoMar 2019 Printed in Romania CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................................................7 Nicolae Anastasiu The energy mix – the key to performance in the 21st century................................................................8 Alexandru Andrăşanu Geoconservation as a new discipline within Geosciences………………………………………………………………….10 Eliza Anton, Mihaela-Carmen Melinte-Dobrinescu Biostratigraphy of the Istria Basin (Nw Black Sea Shelf) based on calcareous nannofossils……………….14 Laurenţiu
    [Show full text]
  • Administraţia Bazinală De Apă Mureş
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş CUPRINS Abrevieri ................................................................................................................................... 4 Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a bazinului hidrografic Mureș .................................................. 6 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în bazinul hidrografic Mureş ....................................................... 14 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ............................. 14 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii ............................................................................................ 43 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor .................................................................................................... 51 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ..................................................................... 53 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații ........................................................... 55 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații .................................................................. 59 2.7. Indicatori statistici ....................................................................................................... 63 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Linguistic Layers Embedded in Romanian Oikonyms Derived from Hagionyms
    Cultural and linguistic layers embedded in Romanian oikonyms derived from hagionyms Oliviu FELECAN and Nicolae FELECAN Introduction In addition to constituting linguistic, geographical, historical, anthropo- logical, ethnographic, social and psychological markers, toponyms may also function as religious symbols, especially in those cases when the name of a place is derived from a hagionym. In the present paper, we focus on hagionymic oikonyms, a field of research that has been explored through various theoretical frameworks within Romania and which pro- vides fruitful insights into religious and cultural practices and attitudes. In the case of oikonyms bearing a religious background, “the proper name is a linguistic sign that designates a precise referent which can be located in time and space” (Billy 1995, p. 142, apud Vaxelaire 2005, p. 161, orig. French1) and whose position is transparent. Accordingly, our study lies within the broad domain of onomastics, highlighting specific aspects related to anthroponymy, on the one hand, and toponymy, on the other. With regard to Romanian anthroponymy, Puşcariu (1976, p. 298, orig. Romanian) has pointed out that: there is no continuity between the official names of pagan Romans and Christian Romanians. […] Christianity does not seem to have greatly affected old Romanian onomastics. In fact, apart from the two names Nicoară and Sumedrea (from Sâmedru = Sanctus Demetrius)2 ­Romanian does not evidence any other hagionyms revealing ancient phonetic structures. 1 The quotations marked as being originally in French or Romanian (indicated by “orig. French” and “orig. Romanian” respectively) are only provided as translations. 2 As an oikonym, this name does not occur in the Daco-Romanian area.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania - Adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV(2017)005 Fourth Opinion on Romania - adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018 Summary The authorities in Romania promote respect and understanding in society and representatives of most national minorities report an overall embracing attitude prevailing between the majority and the minorities. The authorities have made efforts to promote minority cultures and education, and particular steps which have been taken to facilitate representation of national minorities in parliament are widely recognised and appreciated. The Law on Education remains the main legislative basis for teaching in and of national minority languages. A consolidated and coherent legal framework related to the protection of minority rights is lacking and the draft Law on the Status of National Minorities, proposed in parliament in 2006, has still not been adopted. Existing legislation regulating different aspects of national minority protection is disjointed, piecemeal, full of grey zones and open to contradictory interpretation. A coherent policy to guarantee access to minority rights is still lacking and respect of rights of persons belonging to national minorities varies according to local conditions and the goodwill of the municipal or regional authorities. Persistence of negative attitudes and prejudice against the Roma and anti-Hungarian sentiment is of considerable concern. Despite the resolute stance of the National Council for Combating Discrimination, court rulings and statements from the authorities, racist incidents continue to be reported. The revised Strategy for the Inclusion of Romanian Citizens Belonging to the Roma Minority – 2012-2020, adopted in 2015, sets targets in the key areas of education, employment, health and housing and addresses also promotion and protection of Roma culture and participation in public and political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Acord-Ocoale-Judetul-HARGHITA
    romania2019.eu MINISTER UL APELOR ~I P ADURILOR GARDA FORESTIERA BRA~OV Str. loan Slavici nr. I 5A, Mun. Bra~ov , Jud. Bra-$OV, CP 500398 C.I.F 16440270, Tel: 03 741086796, Fax: 03681434183 e-mail: gardaforestiera.brasov@gmail. com Proces verbal incheiat in data de 24.05.2019, cu ocazia ~edintei pentru stabilirea ocoalelor si lvice nominalizate de pe razajude~tllui Harghita. Au participat din partea Garzii Forestiere Bra~ov , Director DIA Gabrian Stelian, ~ef serviciu GFJ Harghita Szikszai Bela, consilier Kiss Arpad, consilier Abutnaritei Mihai, consilier Chirtoaca Mihail. In urma discutiilor purtate cu reprezentantii ocoalelor silvice de regim ~i ai ocoalelor silvice din cadrul Direqiei Silvice Harghita, in vederea stabilirii ocoalelor silvice nominalizate ~i a procedurii de preluare in paza a suprafetelor de fond forestier de maximum 30 ha inclusiv, apartinand persoanelor fizice ~i juridice, In baza Ordinului 530 din 01.04.2019, am convenit ca se vor respecta nominalizarile Ia.cute prin Decizia nr. 1089, din 27.11.2017 (Anexa 1), emisa anterior de inspectorul ~ef al Garzii Forestiere Bra~ov , In vederea stabilirii ocoalelor silvice nominalizate pe raza judetului Harghita, cu urmatoarele modificari: DS Harghita - OS Miercurea Ciuc va fi nominalizat suplimentar pe raza UA T Tu~nad (doar satul Vrabia) ~i pe UAT Gheorgheni; DS Harghita - OS Toplifa va fi nominalizat suplimentar pe raza UA T Borsec; OS Harghita - OS Tulghe~ va fi nominalizat suplimentar pe raza UA T Gheorgheni ~i UAT Ditrau; 1 - OSP Odorheiul Secuiesc va fi nominalizat suplimentar pe raza UAT Dealu ~i UAT Atid (doar satul Ilaceni); OSR Zetea SA nu mai este nominalizat pe UAT Mere~ti; - Pentru UAT Vlahita nu s-a ajuns la un consens pentru stabilirea ocolului silvic nominalizat/ocoalelor silvice nominalizate, urmand ca printr-o adresa ulterioara, ocoalele silvice din zona sa fie invitate la sediul Garzii Forestiere Bra~ov pentru discutii suplimentare.
    [Show full text]
  • Proces-Verbal De Desemnare a Operatorilor De Calculator Ai
    3URFHVYHUEDOGHGHVHPQDUHDRSHUDWRULORUGHFDOFXODWRUDLELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORU GHYRWDUHFRQVWLWXLWHSHQWUXDOHJHUHDDXWRULWă܊LORUDGPLQLVWUD܊LHLSXEOLFHORFDOHGLQGDWDGH27 septembrie 2020, conform deciziei AEP nr. 52 din 04.09.2020, %LURXO(OHFWRUDOGH&LUFXPVFULS܊LH-XGHĠHDQăQU21 HARGHITA Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD Nume Prenume ,QL܊LDOD )XQF܊LD WDWăOXL 1 MUNICIPIUL 1 TEATRUL MUNICIPAL ´CSIKI CÂMPEAN LIVIU-MANOLE Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC JÁTÉKSZÍN´MIERCUREA-CIUC 2 MUNICIPIUL 2 LICEUL DE ARTE ´NAGY ISTVÁN´ MIHALCEA 0$5(܇9,25(/ Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC MIERCUREA-CIUC 3 MUNICIPIUL 3 &$6$'(&8/785Ă$6,1',&$7(/25 PAP MARIA A Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC MIERCUREA-CIUC 4 MUNICIPIUL 4 ܇&2$/$*,01$=,$/Ă´NAGY IMRE´ INCZE RÉKA Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC MIERCUREA-CIUC 5 MUNICIPIUL 5 ù&2$/$*,01$=,$/ĂÄNAGY IMRE´ GABOR LORÁND Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC MIERCUREA-CIUC 6 MUNICIPIUL 6 ܇FRDOD*LPQD]LDOă´Nagy Imre´ POPESCU CRISTINA Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC 7 MUNICIPIUL 7 ܇&2$/$*,01$=,$/Ă´3(7ė), SZÁSZ Zsófia A Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC SÁNDOR´MIERCUREA-CIUC 8 MUNICIPIUL 8 ܇&2$/$*,01$=,$/Ă´3(7ė), OZSVÁTH-BERÉNYI HAJNALKA-JUDIT Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC SÁNDOR´MIERCUREA-CIUC 9 MUNICIPIUL 9 ܇&2$/$*,01$=,$/Ă´LIVIU GYÖRGY Adél A Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC REBREANU´MIERCUREA-CIUC 10 MUNICIPIUL 10 *5Ă',1,ğ$ÄNAPRAFORGÓ´ GALEA MIHAI-VLAD Operator MIERCUREA-CIUC MIERCUREA-CIUC ^ƚƌ͘^ƚĂǀƌŽƉŽůĞŽƐ͕Ŷƌ͘ϲ͕ƵĐƵƌĞƔƚŝ͕^ĞĐƚŽƌϯ͕ϬϯϬϬϴϰ 1/23 Telefon: 021.310.07.69, fax: 021.310.13.86 www.roaep.ro, e-mail: [email protected] 3URFHVYHUEDOGHGHVHPQDUHDRSHUDWRULORUGHFDOFXODWRUDLELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORU
    [Show full text]
  • Some Actual Aspects About the Tourism Accomodation in Harghita County
    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year VII, no. 2, vol. 14, November 2014, p.158-167 ISSN 2065-0817, E-ISSN 2065-1198 Article no. 14106-162 SOME ACTUAL ASPECTS ABOUT THE TOURISM ACCOMODATION IN HARGHITA COUNTY George-Bogdan TOFAN* “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Geography, Cluj-Napoca, 5-7 Clinicilor Street, 40006, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] Adrian NIŢĂ “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Geography, Gheorgheni Branch, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of the study is to synthetically present the tendencies of one of the most important elements of the tourism, the accommodation, within Harghita County. Analyzed for more than two decades, quantitatively it presents an evolution with different positive and negative rates. By categories, the tourist villas dominate at the beginning of the ’90s, especially in the tourist resorts of the county (Borsec, Lacu Roşu, Izvoru Mureşului, Harghita-Băi, Băile Tuşnad, Băile Homorod). Later the situation changed for newer categories, existing and functioning on private initiatives (tourist pensions, agritourist pensions, bungalows), plus for some of the classic categories, the tourist chalet, adapted for the mountain tourism, the hotel, present especially in urban settlements and several resorts (Miercurea-Ciuc, Gheorgheni, Odorheiu Secuiesc, Topliţa, Băile Tuşnad, Harghita-Băi, Borsec), the motel and the tourist stop, specific to the automobile travel. Key words: accommodation, comfort degree, villas, tourist pensions, Harghita * * * * * * INTRODUCTION Aspects about the evolution of the accommodation in Harghita County were presented before in several studies approaching the geographic domain at national level (Geografia României, Geografia Umană şi Economică, 1984), at county level (the Romanian Academy series about the Romanian Counties, Judeţul Harghita, Pişotă, Iancu, Bugă, 1976; Judeţul Harghita, Cocean et al., 2013) or in some doctoral theses regarding the mountain depressions (Şeer, 2004, Mara, 2008, Tofan, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Map and the List of Administrative Units
    Defining the Scope of Application for the Strategy for Development of Sustainable Tourism of the Carpathians: Draft map and the list of administrative units The Carpathian Convention Working Group on Sustainable Tourism at its meeting on 12-14 May 2014, Bratislava, Slovakia, discussed the map presented below. The Working Group concluded that along with administrative units, the map should include the geographical scope of the Carpathians as it is currently defined by the Party. The geographical scope of the Carpathians defines the core area for implementing the actions outlined in the strategy, while the administrative borders are useful for decision making, resource allocation and monitoring purposes. The Working Group decided to develop two maps that may be useful during the implementation of the strategy: 1. A map of local administrative units on LAU1 level in EU countries, “raions” in Ukraine and municipalities in Serbia that also features the geographical scope of the Carpathians. Such map may be helpful when involving the authorities and stakeholders into project development and implementation and when action is needed for decision making and implementation on the smallest administrative level. 2. A map of administrative units at NUTS3 or NUTS2 level, “oblast” in Ukraine and districts in Serbia that also features the geographical scope of the Carpathians. Such map would be useful when action is needed on the regional decision level, and whenever the interlinkage of the Carpathians with surrounding areas is important (e.g. for optimizing
    [Show full text]