DOCSLIB.ORG

Ipac21 Synoptic Table Versão FB 12 A4.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ipac21 Synoptic Table Versão FB 12 A4.Xlsx UTC - 3 IPAC21 Virtual Edition - Synoptic Table Campinas Monday, May 24 Tuesday, May 25 Wednesday, May 26 Thursday, May 27 Friday, May 28 08:00 (MOPAB) 1hour and 30 min 2 Monday Poster Session A (TUPAB) 2 hours (WEPAB) 2 hours (THPAB) 2hours h Tuesday Poster Session A Wednesday Poster Session A Thursday Poster Session A Opening 10:00Chair: Liu Lin Chair: Prapong Klysubun Chair: Sandra Biedron Chair: Ralph Assmann 10:00 Chair: Ubaldo Iriso Chair: Jim Clarke Chair: Yongbin Leng Superconducting Radio-Frequency The Progress of the In-Vacuum Full energy injection from the SACLA Cavity Fault Classification Using Superconducting Undulator Prototype into the SPring-8 storage ring Machine Learning at Jefferson Award Sesssion I for SHINE Project Hirokazu Maesaka (RIKEN) Laboratory 3 Qiaogen Zhou (SARI) n Chris Tennant (JLab) 0 v i 1 - 2021 IEEE PAST Doctoral Student Award : Yipeng Wu - Tsinghua University (currently at a postdoc position at Non Invasive Bunch Length m Advances in beam stability in low- Development of 36 GHz RF systems for Scientific Opportunities for 4th Generation Storage Ring Light Sources Review of high brightness photoinjectors UCLA) The Path to High Power FELs t Measurements Exploiting Cherenkov emittance synchrotron light sources RF linearisers i Diffraction Radiation Harry Westfahl, Jr. (LNLS) Houjun Qian (DESY) Norbert Holtkamp (SLAC) e Guimei Wang (BNL) Alex Castilla (CERN) n 2 - 2021 IEEE PAST Award: Dr. Xijie Wang - SLAC Stefano Mazzoni (CERN) d 3 - 2021 IEEE PAST Awards-Early Career: Dr. Nathan Moody - LANL Cold Powering Systems – MgB2 Based 4 - 2020 APS Wilson Prize: Dr. Bruce Carlsten Harmonic RF Cavities and Instabilities High-Current Power Transmission Next generation sensor systems for in Storage Rings Lines for the HL-LHC Magnets: from online beam diagnostics Marco Venturini (LBNL) Concept to Prototype Validation Meghana Patil (KIT) 5 - 2021 APS Wilson Prize: Prof. Yury Orlov (deceased) accepted by Prof. Georg Hofstaetter Amalia Ballarino (CERN) 10:30Chair: Rafaella Geometrante 10:30 Chair: Ubaldo Iriso Chair: Jim Clarke Chair: Yongbin Leng Newly Development of Ceramics Time-Resolved H- Beam Emittance Commissioning results of LCLS-II MHz Chamber with Integrated Pulsed Measurement at the SNS Linac Using a repetition rate electron source Magnet for Super Narrow Bore in KEK- Industry Session Laser Comb C Feng Zhou (SLAC) PF Yun Liu (ORNL) o Chikaori Mitsuda (KEK) I n 3 n t 0 Goals for the new DOE Office of Accelerator R&D and Production Record High Extraction Efficiency of Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment: Non-Invasive Gas Jet In-Vivo v r Free Electron Laser Oscillator Results & Prospects Dosimetry for Particle Beam Therapy Eric R. Colby (OHEP/DOE) Building the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams Future directions for particle physics in the US i High Power Proton Sources for Neutrino Science i Heishun Zen (Kyoto Univ.) Chris Rogers (STFC) Joseph Wolfenden (Univ. of Liverpool) m Thomas Glasmacher (MSU) Young-Kee Kim (Univ. of Chicago) Eduard Pozdeyev (FNAL) t b i e u n Mitigation of Beam Instabilities in the d t Direct Response Time Measurements Development of the prototype of the Effective Software Collaboration Between Industry and National Labs Echo-Enabled Harmonic Generation On Semiconductor Photocathodes Cavity BPM system for SHINE David Bruhwiler (RadiaSoft) Beamline for FLASH2020+ e Gregor Loisch (DESY) Jian Chen (SSRF) Fabian Pannek (Univ. of Hamburg) d Injector Optimization with 480 kV Collaboration Between Industry and Research Institutes : A Win–Win Approach in Large Research Ringdown Measured in a Four-Bounce, Uncertainty Quantification for Virtual Electron Gun for IR-FEL Operation at Projects 20 Meter Hard X-Ray Cavity Diagnostic of Particle Accelerators the Compact ERL at KEK Paolo Manini (SAES) James MacArthur (SLAC) Adi Hanuka (SLAC) Olga Tanaka (KEK) 11:00 Chair: Todd Satogata Chair: Cristina Vaccarezza Chair: Anna Grasselino Chair: Wolfram Fischer Chair: Mei Bai Chair: Heung-sik Kang Chair: Rohan Dowd Chair: Mark Boland Chair: Hitoshi Tanaka 11:00 Chair: John Byrd Fabrication and Test Challehges of the Beyond RMS: Understanding the Advances in understanding of ion Cascaded THz-driven Acceleration with The ESS Elliptical Cavity Cryomdoule Generation of High-Brightness Self- 3D Tracking of a Single Electron in Transformative Technology for FLASH SC Transport Solenoid for Mu2e Successful Crabbing of Proton Beams Evolution of Beam Distributions in High effects in electron storage rings Record Energy Gain Production seeded X-ray Free Electron Laser IOTA Radiation Therapy I Experiment I Rama Calaga (CERN) I Intensity Linacs 3 Joseph Calvey (ANL) Hanxun Xu (Tsinghua University) Catherine Madec (CEA) Chang-Ki Min (PAL) Aleksandr Romanov (FNAL) Carol Johnstone (FNAL) n Mike Lamm (FNAL) n n Kiersten Ruisard (ORNL) 0 v v v Women in Science : The Inconvenient Truth i The LCLS-II-HE R&D Program – New i i Precision Control of Plasma Wakefields Enhanced Seeded Free Electron Laser m Marcia Barbosa (UFRGS) Beam Dynamics Optimization in High- Insights into Improving the Operational Electron Cooling in the Upgrading J-PARC Accelerator for The Micro Bunching Instability and Beam Arrival Stability at the European Enhancing Particle Beam Therapy t for Highly Efficient and Energy-Spread t Performance with a “Cold” Electron t My View on the 5 Most Beautiful Formulae in Accelerator Physics Brightness Electron Injectors Performance of Nitrogen-Doped SRF Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider Hyper Kamiokande Project Evolving Technologies XFEL Through the Use of Mixed Ion Beams i Preserving Electron Acceleration Beam Chad Mitchell (LBNL) Cavities Alexei Fedotov (BNL) Yiochi Sato (J-PARC) Miriam Brosi (KIT) Marie Kristin Czwalinna (DESY) Simon Jolly (IC) Kaoru Yokoya (KEK) e Sarah Schroeder (DESY) e Giuseppe Penco (ELETTRA) e n Dan Gonnella (SLAC) d d d Recent Results and Future Physics and Technology Challenges in Progress in Mastering Electron Clouds The Multi-User Upgrade of the Review of Superconducting Radio Simultaneous Top-up Injection into High Precision RF Control for Particle Evolution of High-Power Spallation Perspectives for High Quality Electron Fast Reactive Tuners for SRF Cavities Generating High Intensity Positron at the Large Hadron Collider Superconducting Ion Linac, ATLAS Frequency Gun Four Storage Rings at SuperKEKB Accelerators and Qbits Mercury Target at the SNS Beams From Plasma Accelerators Nick Shipman (CERN) Beams Giovanni Iadarola (CERN) Brahim Mustapha (ANL) Rong Xiang (HZDR) Masanori Satoh (KEK) Gang Huang (LNBL) Drew Winder (ORNL) Riccardo Pompii (INFN-LNF) Iryna Chaikovska (LAL) 11:30 Chair: Kathy Harkay Chair: Fernando Sannibale Chair: Tor Raubenheimer Chair: Todd Satogata Chair: Cristina Vaccarezza Chair: Anna Grasselino Chair: Wolfram Fischer Chair: Mei Bai Chair: Heung-sik Kang Chair: Rohan Dowd Chair: Mark Boland Chair: Hitoshi Tanaka 11:30 Simulations of Beam Strikes on Progress Towards Realisation of Combined Effect of Beam-Beam Electron Desorption From Porous Microbunching Instability in the Non-Invasive Dispersion Function Neutrons for Today and Tomorrow - the Commissioning and Restart of ESRF- Coherent Excitations and Circular Fabrication and Tuning of a THz-Driven The RCS Design status for the Electron Commissioning of the Radioactive Ion Advanced Photon Source Upgrade Steady-State Microbunching at the Interaction and Beam Coupling Materials of Interest for Future Presence of Intrabeam Scattering for Measurement during Light Source HBS Project for Compact Accelerator EBS Attractors in Cooled Ion Bunches Electron Gun Ion Collider Beam Transport System for ARIEL Collimators using FLASH, MARS, and Metrology Light Source Impedance in Future Circular Colliders Accelerators Single-Pass Accelerators Operations Based Neutron Sources Simon White (ESRF) Sergei Seletskiy (BNL) Samantha Lewis (SLAC) Vahid Houston Ranjbar (BNL) Suresh Saminathan (TRIUMF) elegant Joerg Feikes (HZB) Yuan Zhang (IHEP) Luisa Spallino (INFN/LNF) Cheng-Ying Tsai (HUST) Boris Podobedov (BNL) Thomas Gutberlet (FZ Julich) Jeff Dooling (ANL) C C C Inverse Orbit Response Matrix Measurements of Beam-Beam Intense Channeling Radiation as a Tool First Results Operating a Long-Period A New Method of 2D Calculation of First Results of the IOTA Ring Improved Lifetime of a High Spin o Production and Testing of NICA o Reconstructing LHC Beam Profiles SPIRAL2 MEBT Commissioning o Measurements: A Possible On-Line Simulation of Imaging Using APS-U Project Interactions in Gear-Changing for a Hybrid Crystal-Based Positron EPU in Universal Mode at the Canadian Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Research at Fermilab Polarization Superlattice Photocathode Collider Magnets With Passive Ghost Imaging Results with Protons and Helium Tool for Optics Control in Storage Accelerated Muon Beams I Robert Hettel (APS) n Collisions in DESIREE Source for Future Colliders n Light Source n Wakefield in Relativistic Beams Alexander Valishev (FNAL) Luca Cultrera (Cornell Univ) Dmitry Nikiforov (JINR) Daniel Ratner (SLAC) Angie Orduz (GANIF) Rings Masashi Otani (KEK) 3 Edith Anne Nissen (JLab) Laura Bandiera (INFN) Ward Wurtz (Canadian Light Source) Jingyi Tang (SLAC) n t t t Zeus Marti (ALBA) 0 v r r r Accelerator Needs for Materials Research: Opportunities for Synergistic i i High Transformer Ratio Plasma i i Loss of Transverse Landau Damping Visualizing Lattice Dynamic Behavior Study of Pb-Pb and Pb-p Collision Eddy Current Effects on the Stored The Effect of Beam Velocity Design and Measurements of an X- Collaboration m Wakefield Acceleration and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slowing Down of a Particle Beam in the Dusty Plasmas with Kappa
    arXiv:1708.04525 Slowing Down of Charged Particles in Dusty Plasmas with Power-law Kappa-distributions Jiulin Du 1*, Ran Guo 2, Zhipeng Liu3 and Songtao Du4 1 Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China 2 School of Science, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China 3 School of Science, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China 4 College of Electronic Information and Automation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China Keywords: Slowing down, Kappa-distributions, Dusty plasma, Fokker-Planck collision theory Abstract We study slowing down of a particle beam passing through the dusty plasma with power-law κ-distributions. Three plasma components, electrons, ions and dust particles, can have a different κ-parameter. The deceleration factor and slowing down time are derived and expressed by a hyper-geometric κ-function. Numerically we study slowing down property of an electron beam in the κ-distributed dusty plasma. We show that the slowing down in the plasma depends strongly on the κ-parameters of plasma components, and dust particles play a dominant role in the deceleration effects. We also show dependence of the slowing down on mass and charge of a dust particle in the plasma. 1 Introduction Dusty plasmas are ubiquitous in astrophysical, space and terrestrial environments, such as the interstellar clouds, the circumstellar clouds, the interplanetary space, the comets, the planetary rings, the Earth’s atmosphere, and the lower ionosphere etc. They can also exist in laboratory plasma environments. Dusty plasma consists of three components: electrons, ions and dust particles of micron- or/and submicron-sized particulates.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading the CMS Detector on the Large Hadron Collider
    Upgrading the CMS Detector on the Large Hadron Collider Stefan Spanier Professor, Department of Physics CURRENT RESEARCH AFFILIATION Putting a diamond on the largest ring in the world The University of Tennessee, Knoxville July 4, 2012 is one of the most exciting dates to remember in modern science. On this day, EDUCATION scientists working with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland discovered a particle consistent with the Ph.D., Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany characteristics of the Higgs boson particle. This particle is predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics. The model is very successful in linking measurements made with previous RESEARCH AREAS particle accelerators, but still leaves unanswered questions about how the universe works. The model does ignores dark matter and dark energy, and while it describes the behavior of Technology, Materials Science / Physics the Higgs particle it does not predict its own mass. These mysteries indicate there must be a larger picture that includes new forces and particles, and the Standard Model is only part of FUNDING REQUEST it. Spanier is seeking $70,000 annually to fund this project. This will cover a graduate student This is where the LHC, the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator comes in. for one year, travel expenses to the particle beam physics laboratory, acquisition and The LHC was first conceived in 1984, and brought online in 2008. It consists of a 27-kilometer preparation of a new detector substrate from a diamond growth process batch and one ring of superconducting magnets with accelerating structures that boost protons to neutron irradiation in a nuclear reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Beam Diagnostics and Control
    Particle beam diagnostics and control G. Kube Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Notkestraße 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany Summary. | Beam diagnostics and instrumentation are an essential part of any kind of accelerator. There is a large variety of parameters to be measured for obser- vation of particle beams with the precision required to tune, operate and improve the machine. Depending on the type of accelerator, for the same parameter the working principle of a monitor may strongly differ, and related to it also the requirements for accuracy. This report will mainly focus on electron beam diagnostic monitors presently in use at 4th generation light sources (single-pass Free Electron Lasers), and present the state-of-the-art diagnostic systems and concepts. 1. { Introduction Nowadays particle accelerators play an important role in a wide number of fields where a primary or secondary beam from an accelerator can be used for industrial or medical applications or for basic and applied research. The interaction of such beam with matter is exploited in order to analyze physical, chemical or biological samples, for a modification of physical, chemical or biological sample properties, or for fundamental research in basic subatomic physics. In order to cover such a wide range of applications different accelerator types are required. Cyclotrons are often used to produce medical isotopes for positron emission to- ⃝c Societ`aItaliana di Fisica 1 2 G. Kube mography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). For elec- tron radiotherapy mainly linear accelerators (linacs) are in operation, while cyclotrons or synchrotrons are additionally used for proton therapy. Third generation synchrotron light sources are electron synchrotrons, while the new fourth generation light sources (free electron lasers) operating at short wavelengths are electron linac based accelera- tors.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Particle Generators/Accelerators
    Joint innovative training and teaching/ learning program in enhancing development and transfer knowledge of application of ionizing radiation in materials processing 4. Particle Generators/Accelerators Diana Adlienė Department of Physics Kaunas University of Technolog y Joint innovative training and teaching/ learning program in enhancing development and transfer knowledge of application of ionizing radiation in materials processing This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author. Polish National Agency and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Date: Oct. 2017 DISCLAIMER This presentation contains some information addapted from open access education and training materials provided by IAEA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. X-ray machines 3. Particle generators/accelerators 4. Types of industrial irradiators The best accelerator in the universe… INTRODUCTION • Naturally occurring radioactive sources: – Up to 5 MeV Alpha’s (helium nuclei) – Up to 3 MeV Beta particles (electrons) • Natural sources are difficult to maintain, their applications are limited: – Chemical processing: purity, messy, and expensive; – Low intensity; – Poor geometry; – Uncontrolled energies, usually very broad Artificial sources (beams) are requested! INTRODUCTION • Beams of accelerated particles can be used to produce beams of secondary particles: Photons (x-rays, gamma-rays, visible light) are generated from beams
    [Show full text]
  • Beam-Transport Systems for Particle Therapy
    Beam-Transport Systems for Particle Therapy J.M. Schippers Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland Abstract The beam transport system between accelerator and patient treatment location in a particle therapy facility is described. After some general layout aspects the major beam handling tasks of this system are discussed. These are energy selection, an optimal transport of the particle beam to the beam delivery device and the gantry, a device that is able to rotate a beam delivery system around the patient, so that the tumour can be irradiated from almost any direction. Also the method of pencil beam scanning is described and how this is implemented within a gantry. Using this method the particle dose is spread over the tumour volume to the prescribed dose distribution. Keywords Beam transport; beam optics; degrader; beam analysis; gantry; pencil beam scanning. 1 Introduction The main purpose of the beam-transport system is to aim the proton beam, with the correct diameter and intensity, at the tumour in the patient and to apply the correct dose distribution. The beam transport from the accelerator to the tumour in the patient consists of the following major sections (see Fig. 1): – energy setting and energy selection (only for cyclotrons); – transport system to the treatment room(s), including beam-emittance matching; – per treatment room—a gantry or a fixed beam line aiming the beam from the correct direction; – beam-delivery system in the treatment room, by which the dose distribution is actually being applied. These devices are combined in the so called ‘nozzle’ at the exit of the fixed beam line or of the gantry.
    [Show full text]
  • Beam–Material Interactions
    Beam–Material Interactions N.V. Mokhov1 and F. Cerutti2 1Fermilab, Batavia, IL 60510, USA 2CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract This paper is motivated by the growing importance of better understanding of the phenomena and consequences of high-intensity energetic particle beam interactions with accelerator, generic target, and detector components. It reviews the principal physical processes of fast-particle interactions with matter, effects in materials under irradiation, materials response, related to component lifetime and performance, simulation techniques, and methods of mitigating the impact of radiation on the components and environment in challenging current and future applications. Keywords Particle physics simulation; material irradiation effects; accelerator design. 1 Introduction The next generation of medium- and high-energy accelerators for megawatt proton, electron, and heavy- ion beams moves us into a completely new domain of extreme energy deposition density up to 0.1 MJ/g and power density up to 1 TW/g in beam interactions with matter [1, 2]. The consequences of controlled and uncontrolled impacts of such high-intensity beams on components of accelerators, beamlines, target stations, beam collimators and absorbers, detectors, shielding, and the environment can range from minor to catastrophic. Challenges also arise from the increasing complexity of accelerators and experimental set-ups, as well as from design, engineering, and performance constraints. All these factors put unprecedented requirements on the accuracy of particle production predictions, the capability and reliability of the codes used in planning new accelerator facilities and experiments, the design of machine, target, and collimation systems, new materials and technologies, detectors, and radiation shielding and the minimization of radiation impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • High Aspect Ratio Electron Beam Generation in KEK-STF
    Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Particle Accelerator Society of Japan (August 3-5, 2013, Nagoya, Japan) High Aspect Ratio Electron Beam Generation in KEK-STF M. Kuriki∗, ADSM/Hiroshima U., 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Hgshiroshima,Hiroshima, 739-8530 H. Hayano, KEK, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801 S. Kashiwagi, REPS, Tohoku U., 1-2-1 Mikamine, Taihakuku, Sendai, 982-0826 Abstract of the beam energy and rapidly increased as a function of the beam energy. For example, in LEP accelerator[3] which Phase-space manipulation on the beam gives a way to is the last e+ and e- collider based on storage rings at this optimize the beam phase space distribution for a specific moment, the energy loss per turn was 2.1 GeV at 100 GeV purpose. It is realized by beam optics components which beam energy. If the energy is increased up to 250 GeV have couplings between degree of freedoms. In this article, which is required to measure Higgs self-coupling, the en- a high aspect ratio beam generation with a photo-cathode ergy loss becomes 72 GeV which can not be maintained at in a solenoid field is described. In International Linear Col- all. lider (ILC) project, a high aspect ratio electron beam is em- Linear collider concept has been proposed to break this ployed for high luminosity up to several 1034cm−2s−1 by difficulty. There is no fundamental limit on the energy for keeping “beam-beam effects” reasonably low. In the cur- linear colliders [7][8]. The acceleration is done by linear rent design of ILC, a high aspect ratio beam which corre- accelerators instead of Synchrotron.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Focused Particle Beam Drivers for Plasma Wakefield Accelerators
    Self-Focused Particle Beam Drivers for Plasma Wakeeld Accelerators B.N. Breizman†, P.Z. Chebotaev, A.M. Kudryavtsev, K.V. Lotov, and A.N. Skrinsky Abstract Strong radial forces are experienced by the particle beam that drives the wakeeld in plasma-based accelerators. These forces may destroy the beam although, under proper arrangements, they can also keep it in radial equilibrium which allows the beam to maintain the wakeeld over a large distance and to provide high energy gain for the accelerated particles. This paper demonstrates the existence of acceptable equilibria for the prebunched beams and addresses the issue of optimum bunch spacing, with implications for forthcoming experiments. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia †Institute for Fusion Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 USA 1 I. Introduction The concept of plasma-based accelerators has become an area of growing interest in re- cent years (see, e.g., reviews1,2 and references therein). It oers the attractive opportunity of achieving very high accelerating gradients that exceed the limits of conventional acceler- ators. These promising acceleration schemes involve excitation of large amplitude plasma waves by either laser pulses or relativistic charged particle beams. These waves, with phase velocity close to the speed of light, can then accelerate particles to superhigh energies in future linear colliders. Several experiments with laser-driven plasma waves have already been initiated. Thus far, the maximum measured energy gain reported is 44 MeV.3 The acceleration occurs in a length of 0.5 mm, which corresponds to an accelerating gradient of 90 GeV/m.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron Radiation R.P
    SYNCHROTRON RADIATION R.P. Walker Sincrotrone Trieste, Italy Abstract The basic properties of synchrotron radiation are described, and their relevance to the design of electron and proton rings is discussed. The development of specialized sources of synchrotron radiation is also considered. 1 . INTRODUCTION The electromagnetic radiation emitted by a charged particle beam in a circular accelerator is termed "synchrotron radiation" (SR) after its first visual observation nearly 50 years ago in the General Electric (G.E.) 70 MeV Synchrotron. The theoretical basis for understanding synchrotron radiation however goes back much further. Maxwell's equations (1873) made it clear that changing charge densities would radiate electromagnetic waves, and Hertz demonstrated these waves in 1887. The first more directly relevant development was the publication of Liénard's paper entitled "The electric and magnetic field produced by an electric charge concentrated at a point and in arbitrary motion" [1]. This work includes the energy loss formula for particles travelling on a circular path with relativistic velocities. Later, Schott published a detailed essay that included also the angular and frequency distribution of the radiation, as well as the polarization properties [2]. No further interest appears to have been taken in the topic until the early 1940's, when theoretical work in the Soviet Union showed that the energy loss may pose a limit on the maximum energy obtainable in the betatron [3]. Then in 1946 Blewett measured the energy loss due to SR in the G.E. 100 MeV betatron and found agreement with theory, but failed to detect the radiation after searching in the microwave region of the spectrum [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Lbl- Neutron Flux Density and Secondary-Particle
    LBL- NEUTRON FLUX DENSITY AND SECONDARY-PARTICLE ENERGY SPECTRA AT THE 184-INCH SYNCHROCYCLOTRON MEDICAL FACILITY A. R. Smith,* W. Schimmerling,** A. M. Henson,* L. L. Kanstein,*** J. B. McCaslin,* L. D. Stephens, * R. H. Thomas.,* J. Ozawa,** and F. W. Yeater*** *Engineering and Technical Services Division **Biomedical Division ***Accelerator Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720 NOTICE Tliii report IMI prepared u in account of work iponioied by ttir United Slates Government. Neither the United Slilei nut Ihe United Statu Department uf Energy, nor any of Iheir employee!, nut any of ihelr cunlraclun. jubcontracloti, of their employee), nukes any warranty, »pteu at Implied, at auumet any kgal liihility ur icipuniibility for theaccutary. eompletencn or inefulneu or any In For mat ion, apparatui, product or proceu dliclcwil, or reprewnu thai Hi uie would nut Infringe priuwly owned righti. CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 THE BIOMEDICAL FACILITY OF THE 184-INCH SYNCHROCYCLOTRON 3.0 CALCULATION OF NEUTRON FIELDS FROM ALPHA-PARTICLE INTERACTIONS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Physical Basis of the Calculation 3.3 Calculation of Neutron Production in 184-Inch Cyclotron Medical Cave 4.0 EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AND TECHNIQUE 4.1 Beam Line Configurations 4.2 Neutron Detectors 4.3 Beam Monitors 4.4 Experimental Measurements 4.5 Secondary-Particle Spectra and Absorbed Dose Calculations 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES TABLES FIGURE LEGENDS FIGURES ABSTRACT Helium ions, with an energy of 920 MeV, produced by the 184-inch synchro­ cyclotron of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory are now being used in a pilot series to determine their efficacy in the treatment of tumors of large volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Hadron Collider
    LARGE HADRON COLLIDER What’s the big deal anyway? Dr. Gail Van Ekeren Gill St.Bernards School Secondary School Freshman Physics Course 1 LHC - the aim of the collider: To smash protons moving at 99.999999% of the speed of light into each other and so recreate conditions a fraction of a second after the big bang. The LHC experiments try and work out what happened. See short introductory video: http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc%2Dmachine%2Doutreach/lhc-video-links.htm 2 OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION • 1. What do particle physicists do? • 2. What are the structure and function of the parts of the LHC? • 3. What are some LHC topics of interest to physicists? 3 WHAT DO PARTICLE PHYSICISTS DO? • 1. Review of Standard Model • 2. Unanswered questions • 3. Frontiers of particle physics – a. Cosmic Frontier – b. Intensity Frontier – c. Energy Frontier 4 WHAT DO PARTICLE PHYSICISTS DO? "Particle physics is the unbelievable in pursuit of the unimaginable. To pinpoint the smallest fragments of the universe you have to build the biggest machine in the world. To recreate the first millionths of a second of creation you have to focus energy on an awesome scale.” The Guardian • lhc-machine-outreach.web. cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/ 5 WHAT DO PARTICLE PHYSICISTS DO? Review of Standard Model www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/final/NP/N07B/standardmodel.jpg 6 WHAT DO PARTICLE PHYSICISTS DO? Some unanswered questions People have long asked, • "What is the world made of?” • "What holds it together?” Physicists hope to fill in their answers to these
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Beam Transfer
    Introduction to Beam Transfer • Types of accelerators • Example uses of accelerators • Transverse phase space • Poincare maps, phase space representation • Recall of accelerator lattices, Twiss parameters • Beam ‘manipulations’ in normalised phase space • The beam transfer process • Key generic requirements and performance indicators • Conclusion TYPES OF ACCELERATORS A word about units used… Energy: in units of eV (electron-Volts): corresponds to the energy gained by charge of a single electron moved across a potential difference of one volt. 1 eV = 1.602176565(35) × 10-19 × 1 J This comes from electrostatic particle accelerators. Unit of mass m: we use Unit of mass is eV/c2 Unit of momentum p: with Unit of momentum is eV/c Natural Accelerators exist… • Radioactive Accelerators – Rutherford experiment 1911 – Used a particles tunneling through the Coulomb barrier of Ra and Th to investigate the inner structure of atoms – Existence of positively charged nucleus, d ~ 10-13 m – a particle kinetic energy ~ 6 MeV • Cosmic rays – Energies up to 3 x 1020 eV for heavy elements have been measured. ~ 40 x 106 times what the LHC can do. – “Ultra high energy” cosmic rays are rare… Why build accelerators then….? “Our” accelerators have advantages: • High (and monochromatic) energies are possible • High fluxes of a given particle species are possible • Beam delivery can be controlled to a specific location with specific beam properties Recall: accelerating and deflecting The Lorentz force is the force experienced by a charged particle moving in an applied electric field E and magnetic field B: 푭 = 푞 푬 + 풗 × 푩 For particle direction 풗 parallel to 풅풓 the change in energy DE is 푟1 푟1 푟1 ∆퐸 = 푭 풅풓 = 푞 푬 + 풗 × 푩 풅풓 = 푞 푬 풅풓 = 푞푈 푟2 푟2 푟2 Important consequences (in general, and for beam transfer): 1.
    [Show full text]