Captive Propagation of the Japanese Pit Viper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Captive Propagation of the Japanese Pit Viper Japanese Journal of Herpetology 8 (3): 90-94. 1980. Captive Propagation of the Japanese Pit Viper, Agkistrodon blomhoffi blomhoffi Gerald MARZEC* ABSTRACT: I obtained a group of 5 Japanese pit vipers, Agkistrodon blomhoffi blomhoffi (2 males and 3 females), from a reptile dealer in New Jersey in June 1963 and kept them in captivity. One female bred annually from 1964 to 1967, a second female bred once in 1966, and the third female bred in 1966 and 1967. Of the 7 broods born in captivity, the number of young in each litter varied from 3 to 12 with a mean of 7.0. The conditions of light and temperature in the cages were as follows: in winter, 8 hours of light, with a temperature of 19-21℃ during the day and 13-15℃ at night; in summer, 16 hours of light, with a tem- perature variation of from 21 to 29℃; the light and temperature were gradually increased during the spring and decreased during the fall. INTRODUCTION The Japanese pit viper, Agkistrodon blomhoffi blomhoffi, is a common viviparous snake found on the larger main islands of Japan. Locally it is called the "mamushi". Regarding its breeding habits, Fukada (1962, 1972) has reported the size of litters born in captivity and the growth of captive-born young, but there seems to be no report in the literature of successive yearly reproduction of this species. I have kept a group of mamushis which mated and reproduced annually . In this report I record my observations on these events, together with a description of the conditions of housing and feeding. MATERIAL In June, 1963, I obtained a group of 5 mamushis from a reptile dealer in New Jersey. The group consisted of 2 males and 3 females. I identified these as Japanese mamushis on the basis of coloration and pattern. The total length of each specimen, measured in June, 1963, is shown in Table 1. All of the specimens were colored normally except for female No. 1, which had two dorsal stripes down the rear 20.5cm of the body. * 15 Goodwill Lane , Holbrook, N. Y. 11741, USA 90 Vol. 8, No. 3, 1980 91 Table 1. Total length of specimens measured in 1963. CONDITIONS OF CAPTIVITY 1. Housing The breeding group was housed in a cage measuring 1m×1m×64cm high. The cage was constructed of plywood with a glass door in the front. The plywood was coated with a layer of fiberglass resin. There was a pool 25.5cm×20cm×5.5cm deep, which served the snakes as a water dish and enabled them to soak themselves when they desired. The substrate was a pine bark mulch. There were numerous retreats formed by rocks, hollow logs, and artificial plants. 2. Lighting and temperature Variation in temperature was achieved by the use of heat tapes placed under one side of the cage. This allowed the snakes, to some extent, to choose a suitable hiding place at a preferred temperature. Lighting was achieved by the mounting of a Gro-Lux fluorescent bulb above the glass door. On each side of the Gro-Lux bulb there was a 60W incandescent bulb. All lighting fixtures were covered by a mesh screen to keep the snakes from coming in direct contact with the bulbs. The lighting fixtures and the screening were not visible when the enclosure was viewed from the outside. A yearly light cycle was maintained as follows. I used 8 hours of daylight during the winter months with the nighttime temperature between 13℃ and 15℃, and a daytime temperature of 21℃ with a cooler area of 19℃. During this 8-hour daily cycle I maintained a 30% level of humidity. There were times when some of the mamushis had to be soaked in gallon jars containing warm water to aid in shedding. This light cycle was gradually increased in the spring to 12 hours of daylight with a range in temperature between 18℃ and 26℃. At this time an 85% level of humidity was maintained by twice daily spraying the cage with a mist of water. During this cycle it was never necessary to soak the snakes to aid in shedding. The daylight cycle reached its maximum at 16 hours in the summer months with a temperature range between 21℃ to 29℃ and a humidity level of between 65 to 75%. In the fall the daylight cycle and humidity were both gradually decreased until the 92 爬虫両棲類学雑誌 prementioned winter levels were reached. DIET AND FEEDING All of the adult mamushis were fed on a diet of one dead mouse every 10 days. The mice were frozen and then defrosted to room temperature prior to feeding. Each individual was removed from the display cage to a ten-gallon aquarium for feeding. Both of the males and two of the females (Nos. 1 and 3) would take the mice directly from forceps. Female No. 2 would have to be placed in an aquarium with a retreat and left overnight with a dead mouse, as this was the only way she would accept food. All specimens when first obtained would only accept live mice, as long as the mice offered were not white. The snakes were then conditioned to take freshly killed mice, and were then fed them until they started to accept the defrosted mice. There were only two conditions under which this feeding schedule was deviated from. The first exception was when the snakes became opaque before shedding, when they sometimes skipped a feeding. The second deviation occurred during the 12-hour daylight period. I would construct an imitation rat nest with used rat litter in a retreat inside a ten-gallon aquarium. I would then place four or five, depending on their size, live suckling rats inside the "nest". Each mamushi was permitted to eat these four or five rats per feeding. OBSERVATIONS 1. Copulation and Birth The 5 mamushis were normally housed together. However, prior to the 12-hour daylight cycle the two males were removed for approximately three weeks and housed separately. Upon re-introducing the males to the display cage there was a marked increase in the activity of both the males and females. The 5 mamushis were normally very secretive and copulation was observed only once, on the evening of June 7, 1964. At 8:30 PM I observed male No. 2 actively pursuing female No. 1. The male finally overtook the female and with much dif- ficulty oriented himself, by way of spasmatic jerks, along the left side of the female. There was much disparity between the lengths of the two snakes and it took quite a bit of work for the male to finally align himself with his vent in line with the female's vent. When this was accomplished, his tail was wrapped around the female's, and her tail was raised. At this point I could not see the insertion of the male's hemipenis due to a log in my line of vision. I did not want to take the chance and move the log for fear that any distraction might disrupt them so much that they Vol. 8, No. 3, 1980 93 would discontinue their mating. Both specimens remained motionless for about 3 minutes, and then for an additional 2 minutes the male twitched until they separated. The young were all born at night and all at one time. There was no "holding over" of the young as I have observed in some other species. One example is found in ball pythons, Python regius: I have on one occasion observed a female of this species lay 5 eggs in one sitting, and then lay another 4 eggs 2 days later. 2. Juveniles The young were all colored similarly to the adults although the patterns were more distinct and the colors much brighter. The tails were bright yellow on all of the young. Female No. 1 had the largest total of young (34). Although aberrantly patterned all of her offspring were typically colored and patterned. Dates of birth, number of young, etc. are shown in Table 2. In 7 broods born in captivity, the number of young in one litter varied from 3 to 12, with a mean of 7.0. The young were housed individually in plastic shoe boxes. Paper towels were used as a substrate. A small water dish was included, along with a piece of bark under which the young spent most of their time. Ecdysis took place for the first time between five and ten days after birth. Feeding the young proved to be quite difficult. At first, all refused pink mice and small lizards. All but a few started to eat small hylid frogs and then gradually accepted Anolis and pink mice. A small number of the juveniles refused all food items offered and were force-fed pink mice. Of these, all but two began to feed on their own after two or three force-feedings. Tail luring was observed in the majority of individuals. It was observed about 50% of the time any food item was placed in the cage. Typically the young snake would be under the piece of bark provided, and when it detected movement, it would extend its tail out from under the bark and wiggle it. Table 2. Data on birth and young of the mamushi. 94 爬虫両棲類学雑誌 REFERENCES Fukada, H. 1962. Biological studies on the snakes IX. Breeding habit of Agkistrodon halys blomhoffii (Boie). Bull. Kyoto Gakugei Univ. B, 20: 12-17. Fukada, H. 1972. Growth and maturity of some Japanese snakes (Review). The Snake 4: 75-83.
Recommended publications
  • COTTONMOUTH Agkistrodon Piscivorus
    COTTONMOUTH Agkistrodon piscivorus Agkistrodon is derived from ankistron and odon which in Greek mean “fishhook” and “tooth or teeth;” referring to the curved fangs of this species. Piscivorus is derived from piscis and voro which in Latin mean “fish” and “to eat”. Another common name for cottonmouth is water moccasin. The Cottonmouth is venomous. While its bite is rarely fatal, tissue damage is likely to occur and can be severe if not treated promptly. IDENTIFICATION Appearance: The cottonmouth is a stout- bodied venomous snake that reaches lengths of 30 to 42 inches as adults. Most adults are uniformly dark brown, olive, or black, tending to lose the cross banded patterning with age. Some individuals may have a dark cheek stripe (upper right image). The cottonmouth has the diagnostic features of the pit-viper family such as a wedge-shaped head, sensory pits between the eyes and nostrils, and vertical “cat-like” pupils. Juveniles are lighter and more boldly patterned with a yellow coloration toward the tip of the tail (lower right image). Dorsal scales are weakly keeled, and the subcaudal scales form only one row. Cottonmouths also have a single anal Mike Redmer plate. Subspecies: There are three subspecies of the cottonmouth. The Western Cottonmouth (A. p. leucostoma) is the only subspecies found in the Midwest. The term leucostoma refers to the white interior of mouth. Confusing Species: The non-venomous watersnakes (Nerodia) are commonly confused with Cottonmouths across their range, simply because they are snakes in water. Thus it is important to note that Cottonmouths are only found in southernmost Midwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Venomous Snakes of Texas.Pub
    Price, Andrew. 1998. Poisonous Snakes of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Distributed by University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas. Tenant, Alan. 1998. A Field Guide to Texas Snakes. Gulf Publishing Com- pany, Houston, Texas. Texas Coral Snake, Micrurus fulvius Werler, John E. & James R. Dixon. tenere. This species averages 20 2000. Texas Snakes: Identification, inches (record 47 inches). Slender, Distribution, and Natural History. Uni- brightly colored snake with red, black versity of Texas Press, Austin, Texas. and yellow bands that completely en- circle the body. Red and yellow color touch. Venomous Snakes of East Texas Additional, more in depth information Written by: Gordon B. Henley, Jr. Zoo on snakes of Texas, in particular the Director venomous species, can be found in Photos by: Celia K. Falzone, General the following publications: Curator Editorial Assistance provided by: Conant, Roger & Joseph T. Collins. J. Colin Crawford, Education Assistant 1998. A Field Guide to Reptile and Amphibians: Eastern and Central North America. Houghton Mifflin Provided as a Public Service Company, Boston, Massachusetts. by Dixon, James R. 1987. Amphibians and Reptiles of Texas. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas. (2nd Edition 2000). Venomous Snakes of East Texas with Emphasis on Angelina County Texas provides habitat for approximately 115 species of snakes with nearly 44 spe- cies found in the piney woods region of East Texas. Fifteen species of venomous snakes are found throughout the state while only 5 venomous species are found Southern Copperhead, Agkistrodon in the East Texas pine forests: two spe- contortrix contortrix. This species aver- cies of rattlesnakes; a copperhead; the ages 24 inches (record 52 inches).
    [Show full text]
  • The Venomous Snakes of Texas Health Service Region 6/5S
    The Venomous Snakes of Texas Health Service Region 6/5S: A Reference to Snake Identification, Field Safety, Basic Safe Capture and Handling Methods and First Aid Measures for Reptile Envenomation Edward J. Wozniak DVM, PhD, William M. Niederhofer ACO & John Wisser MS. Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Institute for Biosciences and Technology, Program for Animal Resources, 2121 W Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (Wozniak) City Of Pearland Animal Control, 2002 Old Alvin Rd. Pearland, Texas 77581 (Niederhofer) 464 County Road 949 E Alvin, Texas 77511 (Wisser) Corresponding Author: Edward J. Wozniak DVM, PhD, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Institute for Biosciences and Technology, Program for Animal Resources, 2121 W Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 [email protected] ABSTRACT: Each year numerous emergency response personnel including animal control officers, police officers, wildlife rehabilitators, public health officers and others either respond to calls involving venomous snakes or are forced to venture into the haunts of these animals in the scope of their regular duties. North America is home to two distinct families of native venomous snakes: Viperidae (rattlesnakes, copperheads and cottonmouths) and Elapidae (coral snakes) and southeastern Texas has indigenous species representing both groups. While some of these snakes are easily identified, some are not and many rank amongst the most feared and misunderstood animals on earth. This article specifically addresses all of the native species of venomous snakes that inhabit Health Service Region 6/5s and is intended to serve as a reference to snake identification, field safety, basic safe capture and handling methods and the currently recommended first aide measures for reptile envenomation.
    [Show full text]
  • Copperhead & Endangered Species Agkistrodon Contortrix
    Natural Heritage Copperhead & Endangered Species Agkistrodon contortrix Program State Status: Endangered www.mass.gov/nhesp Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: Copperheads get their name due to their solid, relatively unmarked, coppery-colored head resembling the color of an old copper coin. As with all pit vipers, Copperheads have broad, triangularly shaped heads, with a distinct narrowing just behind the head. The eyes have vertically elliptical (catlike) pupils. There is a very thin line on each side of the face that separates the richer copper color of the top of the head from the lighter color of the lip area. The iris of the eye is pale gold, and the pupil is dark. On the body there is a series of dark brown to reddish, hourglass-shaped, cross bands. These are narrow in the middle of the body and broad to the sides. The ground color ranges from beige to tan. Body markings are continuous over the entire length of the body, including the tail. Young snakes are replicas of adults, except that the body has an overtone of light grey and the tip of the tail is yellow. Adult from Hampshire County; photo by Mike Jones/MassWildlife Adult Copperheads usually measure 60–90 cm (24–36 inches) in length; the newborn young are usually 18–23 ridge protrudes from the middle of each scale), giving cm (7–9 inches). Males usually have longer tails, but the snake a relatively rough-skinned appearance. females can grow to greater total lengths (up to 4 feet). There is no reliable external cue to differentiate the SIMILAR SPECIES IN MASSACHUSETTS: The sexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York
    CHECKLIST OF AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, BIRDS AND MAMMALS OF NEW YORK STATE Including Their Legal Status Eastern Milk Snake Moose Blue-spotted Salamander Common Loon New York State Artwork by Jean Gawalt Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Page 1 of 30 February 2019 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Diversity Group 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-4754 This web version is based upon an original hard copy version of Checklist of the Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York, Including Their Protective Status which was first published in 1985 and revised and reprinted in 1987. This version has had substantial revision in content and form. First printing - 1985 Second printing (rev.) - 1987 Third revision - 2001 Fourth revision - 2003 Fifth revision - 2005 Sixth revision - December 2005 Seventh revision - November 2006 Eighth revision - September 2007 Ninth revision - April 2010 Tenth revision – February 2019 Page 2 of 30 Introduction The following list of amphibians (34 species), reptiles (38), birds (474) and mammals (93) indicates those vertebrate species believed to be part of the fauna of New York and the present legal status of these species in New York State. Common and scientific nomenclature is as according to: Crother (2008) for amphibians and reptiles; the American Ornithologists' Union (1983 and 2009) for birds; and Wilson and Reeder (2005) for mammals. Expected occurrence in New York State is based on: Conant and Collins (1991) for amphibians and reptiles; Levine (1998) and the New York State Ornithological Association (2009) for birds; and New York State Museum records for terrestrial mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Evolution of the New World Pitviper Genus
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2009) 36, 1164–1180 ORIGINAL Climate change and evolution of the New ARTICLE World pitviper genus Agkistrodon (Viperidae) Michael E. Douglas1*, Marlis R. Douglas1, Gordon W. Schuett2 and Louis W. Porras3 1Illinois Natural History Survey, Institute for ABSTRACT Natural Resource Sustainability, University of Aim We derived phylogenies, phylogeographies, and population demographies Illinois, Champaign, IL, 2Department of Biology and Center for Behavioral for two North American pitvipers, Agkistrodon contortrix (Linnaeus, 1766) and Neuroscience, Georgia State University, A. piscivorus (Lace´pe`de, 1789) (Viperidae: Crotalinae), as a mechanism to Atlanta, GA and 37705 Wyatt Earp Avenue, evaluate the impact of rapid climatic change on these taxa. Eagle Mountain, UT, USA Location Midwestern and eastern North America. Methods We reconstructed maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) relationships based on 846 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) ATPase 8 and ATPase 6 genes sequenced over 178 individuals. We quantified range expansions, demographic histories, divergence dates and potential size differences among clades since their last period of rapid expansion. We used the Shimodaira–Hasegawa (SH) test to compare our ML tree against three biogeographical hypotheses. Results A significant SH test supported diversification of A. contortrix from northeastern Mexico into midwestern–eastern North America, where its trajectory was sundered by two vicariant events. The first (c. 5.1 Ma) segregated clades at 3.1% sequence divergence (SD) along a continental east–west moisture gradient. The second (c. 1.4 Ma) segregated clades at 2.4% SD along the Mississippi River, coincident with the formation of the modern Ohio River as a major meltwater tributary.
    [Show full text]
  • Venomous Nonvenomous Snakes of Florida
    Venomous and nonvenomous Snakes of Florida PHOTOGRAPHS BY KEVIN ENGE Top to bottom: Black swamp snake; Eastern garter snake; Eastern mud snake; Eastern kingsnake Florida is home to more snakes than any other state in the Southeast – 44 native species and three nonnative species. Since only six species are venomous, and two of those reside only in the northern part of the state, any snake you encounter will most likely be nonvenomous. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission MyFWC.com Florida has an abundance of wildlife, Snakes flick their forked tongues to “taste” their surroundings. The tongue of this yellow rat snake including a wide variety of reptiles. takes particles from the air into the Jacobson’s This state has more snakes than organs in the roof of its mouth for identification. any other state in the Southeast – 44 native species and three nonnative species. They are found in every Fhabitat from coastal mangroves and salt marshes to freshwater wetlands and dry uplands. Some species even thrive in residential areas. Anyone in Florida might see a snake wherever they live or travel. Many people are frightened of or repulsed by snakes because of super- stition or folklore. In reality, snakes play an interesting and vital role K in Florida’s complex ecology. Many ENNETH L. species help reduce the populations of rodents and other pests. K Since only six of Florida’s resident RYSKO snake species are venomous and two of them reside only in the northern and reflective and are frequently iri- part of the state, any snake you en- descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorsal and Ventral Color Patterns in a South Georgia Population of Agkistrodon Piscivorus Contanti, the Florida Cottonmouth David L
    Georgia Journal of Science Volume 75 No. 2 Scholarly Contributions from the Article 13 Membership and Others 2017 Dorsal and Ventral Color Patterns in a South Georgia Population of Agkistrodon piscivorus contanti, the Florida Cottonmouth David L. Bechler Valdosta State University, [email protected] Joseph A. Kirkley Mr. Wiregrass Georgia Technical College, [email protected] John F. Elder Valdosta State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Bechler, David L.; Kirkley, Joseph A. Mr.; and Elder, John F. (2017) "Dorsal and Ventral Color Patterns in a South Georgia Population of Agkistrodon piscivorus contanti, the Florida Cottonmouth," Georgia Journal of Science, Vol. 75, No. 2, Article 13. Available at: http://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs/vol75/iss2/13 This Research Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia Journal of Science by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. Dorsal and Ventral Color Patterns in a South Georgia Population of Agkistrodon piscivorus contanti, the Florida Cottonmouth Cover Page Footnote As the editor-in-chief of the Georgia Journal of Science, upon submission of this manuscript, I, David L. Bechler, have recused myself of all aspects of the review process and assigned the associate editor all aspects of the review process to include acceptance or rejection. This research articles is available in Georgia Journal of Science: http://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs/vol75/iss2/13 Bechler et al.: Dorsal and Ventral Agkistrodon piscivorus Coloring Patterns DORSAL AND VENTRAL COLOR PATTERNS IN A SOUTH GEORGIA POPULATION OF Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti, THE FLORIDA COTTONMOUTH 1David L.
    [Show full text]
  • The First European Pit Viper from the Miocene of Ukraine
    The first European pit viper from the Miocene of Ukraine MARTIN NANOV Ivanov, M. 1999. The fust European pit viper from the Miocene of Ukraine. - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 44,3,327-334. The first discoveries of European pit vipers (Crotalinae gen. et sp. indet. A and B) are re- ported from the Ukrainian Miocene (MN 9a) locality of Gritsev. Based on perfectly pre- served maxillaries, two species closely related to pit vipers of the 'Agkistrodon' complex are represented at the site. It is suggested that the European fossil representatives of the 'Agkistrodon' complex are Asiatic immigrants. Pit vipers probably never expanded into the broader areas of Europe during their geological hstory. Key words: Snakes, Crotalinae, migrations, Miocene, Ukraine. Martin Ivanov [[email protected]], Department of Geology & Palaeontology, Mu- ravian Museum, Zelny' trh 6, 659 37 Bmo, Czech Republic. Introduction Gritsev is located in the western part of Ukraine, in the Khrnelnitsk area, Shepetovski district. The locality contains karstic fillings within a limestone quarry on the right bank of the Khomora river, less than 5 km west of the village of Gritsev. The strati- graphic age of the site corresponds to the Upper Miocene (lower - 'novomoskevski' - horizon of the Middle Sarmatian, MN 9a Mammal Neogene faunal zone). This locality corresponds to the Kalfinsky Formation ('Kalfinsky faunistic complex') and to the Gritsev layers ('Gritsev faunistic complex'). Fossil reptiles from Gritsev have already been investigated. Thus far, Agarnidae, Gekkonidae, Lacertidae, Anguidae, Scincidae, ?Amphisbaenia, Boidae (subfamily Erycinae), Colubridae, Elapidae and Viperidae have been reported (Lungu et al. 1989; Szyndlar & Zerova 1990; Zerova 1987, ,1989, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Food Habits of Sympatric Pitvipers from the West Gulf Coastal Plain, USA
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Faculty Publications Forestry 2018 Food Habits of Sympatric Pitvipers from the West Gulf Coastal Plain, USA Christopher M. Schalk Stephen F Austin State University, [email protected] Toni Trees Wildlife Habitat and Silviculture Laboratory, Southern Research Station, U.S.D.A., Forest Service, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962 Joshua B. Pierce Wildlife Habitat and Silviculture Laboratory, Southern Research Station, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962 D. Craig Rudolph Wildlife Habitat and Silviculture Laboratory, Southern Research Station, U.S.D.A., Forest Service, Nacogdoches, Texas 75962 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestry Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Forest Biology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Schalk, Christopher M.; Trees, Toni; Pierce, Joshua B.; and Rudolph, D. Craig, "Food Habits of Sympatric Pitvipers from the West Gulf Coastal Plain, USA" (2018). Faculty Publications. 521. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestry/521 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Forestry at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES 1 ARTICLES Herpetological Review, 2018, 49(1), 1–5. © 2018 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Food Habits of Sympatric Pitvipers from the West Gulf Coastal Plain, USA Widespread species that occupy multiple communities across their range (Ernst and Ernst 2011). Their diet has been exhibit geographic variation in their natural history due to the examined and synthesized across much of their range, yet there ecological context of the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Agkistrodon Piscivorus) Across Different Prey Sizes, Prey Taxa, and Snake Body Temperatures
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Spring 2016 Venom Expelled by Cottonmouths (Agkistrodon Piscivorus) Across Different Prey Sizes, Prey Taxa, and Snake Body Temperatures Kari Lynn Spivey As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Spivey, Kari Lynn, "Venom Expelled by Cottonmouths (Agkistrodon Piscivorus) Across Different Prey Sizes, Prey Taxa, and Snake Body Temperatures" (2016). MSU Graduate Theses. 5. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/5 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VENOM EXPELLED BY COTTONMOUTHS (AGKISTRODON PISCIVORUS) ACROSS DIFFERENT PREY SIZES, PREY TAXA, AND SNAKE BODY TEMPERATURES A Masters Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Biology By Kari Spivey May 2016 VENOM EXPELLED BY COTTONMOUTHS (AGKISTRODON PISCIVORUS) ACROSS DIFFERENT PREYSIZES, PREY TAXA, AND SNAKE BODY TEMPERATURES Biology Missouri State University, May, 2016 Master of Science Kari Spivey ABSTRACT Pit vipers possess a sophisticated venom delivery system enabling them to efficiently disable prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Snakes of Rhode Island
    Native Snakes of Rhode Island Although many cultures around the world respect snakes and revere them as symbols of renewal and fertility, in our society the relationship between humans and snakes primarily involves apprehension. Unfortunately, the fear that many people have for these legless members of the reptile family is based largely on learned behavior and misinformation. Therefore, this pamphlet was created to educate people about the species of snakes they might see here in Rhode Island, and to suggest how to handle unexpected encounters. Although some species appear menacing and may bite when threatened, snakes are generally much more afraid of you then you are of them, and no native Rhode Island snake poses any threat to life, limb, or property. Native snakes are a natural and important part of healthy ecosystems and are fascinating creatures worth understanding more fully. It is important to note that NO SPECIES OF NATIVE RHODE ISLAND SNAKE IS VENOMOUS. Timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) were once found in Rhode Island, but disappeared nearly fifty years ago. There are still rattlesnake populations in Connecticut and Massachusetts but none of these occurs near Rhode Island’s borders. Copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) are also found in southern New England, but have never been documented in Rhode Island. Lastly, although there are many stories about water moccasins in Rhode Island, these tales obviously refer to common water snakes because the real water moccasin, or cottonmouth as it is sometimes known (Agkistrodon piscivorus), is a southern species found no further north than the state of Virginia. Allegheny ratsnake (Pantherophis alleganiensis) Description: Formerly referred to as black rat snake, this species is black in color, with light areas often visible between the scales.
    [Show full text]