DOCSLIB.ORG

Your Ref: 14 March 2013 Sent by Email to Request-145256-F7e79241

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Your Ref: 14 March 2013 Sent by Email to Request-145256-F7e79241 Annemarie O’Donnell LLB Executive Director Corporate Services Glasgow City Council City Chambers George Square Glasgow G2 1DU Phone 0141 287 4522 Fax No 0141 287 3627 Our ref: RQST4228881 Your ref: 14 March 2013 Sent by email to [email protected] Dear Mr Hughes REQUEST FOR REVIEW UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 (“THE ACT”) Thank you for your email of 26 February 2013 in which you have requested a formal review of the way in which Glasgow City Council (the “Council”) dealt with your request for information received by the Council on 11 January You have requested a review on the basis that you are dissatisfied with the response that the Council sent to you on 26 February 2013. YOUR REQUEST You requested the following information: “Can you confirm that Gordon Matheson accompanied Steven Purcell on council business to London during February 2010? Can you confirm that they stayed at the Kensington Holiday Inn and that all costs were met from the public purse? Can you confirm that Gordon Matheson was required to escort Steven Purcell back to Glasgow earlier than scheduled as a result of what Mr. Matheson referred to as "a total breakdown" experienced by Mr.Purcell? Can you confirm that this issue was the subject of discussion and correspondence involving several senior officials of the council? Can you make available all correspondence relating to this matter, particularly correspondence from Gordon Matheson in respect of the "bizarre" behaviour of Steven Purcell that has been reported to have been observed while in London?” C:\DOCUME~1\aysheab\LOCALS~1\Temp\4428881 REVIEW LETTER2.doc THE DECISION On 26 February 2013 a response was sent to you from Ayshea Brown Corporate services Glasgow City Council, setting out the responses to the issues raised in your request for information. THE REVIEW On 26 February 2013 you wrote to the Council expressing your dissatisfaction with the way in which the Council dealt with your request for information. I understand from your review request that, in summary, the reasons for your dissatisfaction are as follows: 1. The Council did not release information to you which they consider exempt under the freedom of Information ( Scotland ) Act 2002 2. You believe the Council’s decision to withhold information to you on the grounds of data protection was erroneous 3. You were dissatisfied with the Council’s explanation of its decision to withhold the complainant’s details. THE REVIEW DECISION I have now reviewed Ms Brown’s decision. In relation to your request for review, I have addressed below, using the same numbering as in the paragraph above, what I understand to be the key points of your request for review: 1. I consider this aspect of the request to be outwith the scope of Freedom of Information. The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2004 (“the Act”) entitles a person to request recorded information held by a Scottish local authority at the time the request is made (s.1 of the Act). The entitlement does not extend to a right to request that the public authority answers additional questions or provide analysis or opinion on any matter arising from the request, unless such opinion existed in a recorded format at the time the request was made. 2. With regard to the Council’s decision not to release further details of the communications which you request access to. I take the view that the relevant exemptions are contained in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 Exemptions relied upon and referred to above are:- Section 30 Prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs Section 30 (b) disclosure of the information would, or would be likely to, inhibit substantially- (i) the free and frank provision of advice; or (ii) the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation; or Section 30 (c) disclosure of the information would otherwise prejudice substantially, or be likely to prejudice substantially, the effective conduct of public affairs. C:\DOCUME~1\aysheab\LOCALS~1\Temp\4428881 REVIEW LETTER2.doc The information you have requested is, in my opinion, exempt from a request under section 1 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 because of the exemption contained in section 30 of the Act as set out above, thus in my opinion disclosure of the exemption would, or would be likely to inhibit or prejudice substantially the free and frank provision of advice of officers of the Council. The advice and discussions between officers (and on this occasion, elected members) would be likely to be inhibited if information of this type were to be released, to the substantial prejudice of the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation. While I believe the exemption contained in section 30 applies in this case, I would still be obliged to release the information in response to your request unless the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Glasgow City Council acknowledges the significant public interest in openness and transparency and therefore recognises that any request under section 1 of the Act is potentially in the public interest. I acknowledge the significant public interest in the subject matter of your request. However, I also believe there is a significant public interest in authorities such as the Council being able to assess critically all factors involved in these types of decisions, and to reach the best possible decision. On occasions this can only be done on the basis of candid advice and a free exchange of views, of a sort which cannot take place if all information is disclosed. The public interest in openness and transparency is satisfied by the release of all relevant information concerning the decisions ultimately reached and the reasons for these, without the need to disclose all the debate which surrounded these decisions. The Council has already released significant amounts of information regarding this matter (limited, it has to be said, by the relatively small amount of information actually held) I find the information the Council already released is sufficient to meet that significant public interest. In the circumstances of these messages the specific public interest in safeguarding the very small amount of information withheld clearly outweighs the general public interest in openness and transparency. Section 38 Personal Information The information which you have requested is, in my opinion, exempt from a request under section 1 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 because of the exemption contained in section 38 (1)(b) of the Act. In other words, in my opinion disclosure would involve disclosing personal data as defined in the Data Protection Act 1998, and that such disclosure would breach the Data Protection Principles contained in Schedule 1 Part 1 of that Act. I have sought to identify relevant conditions within the Data Protection Act 1998 which would justify the release of this personal data, but have concluded that none of these principles would be satisfied if the Council were to disclose the data in question. 3. Information is exempt from release if it constitutes personal data of a third party and release of the information would breach any of the data protection principles set out in schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998. In this instance, I take the view that release of the information would breach the first data protection principle i.e. that personal data must “be processed fairly and lawfully”. C:\DOCUME~1\aysheab\LOCALS~1\Temp\4428881 REVIEW LETTER2.doc RIGHT OF APPEAL I hope that you are satisfied with this response. However, if you are not you have the right to make an application within 6 months of receipt of this letter for a decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner, Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road, St Andrews, KY16 9DS. Yours sincerely ANNEMARIE O’DONNELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR C:\DOCUME~1\aysheab\LOCALS~1\Temp\4428881 REVIEW LETTER2.doc .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Culture and Sport Glasgow (A Company Which Is a Scottish Charity
    Culture and Sport Glasgow (A company which is a Scottish charity (Scottish charity number SC037844) incorporated in Scotland under the Companies Acts with company number SC313851) MINUTE of a MEETING of the Board of Directors of Culture and Sport Glasgow held at Tramway, Glasgow on 25 November 2009 at 10.30am. Present: Bailie Elizabeth Cameron (Chair) Councillor Stephen Curran Sir Angus Grossart (by conference phone) Councillor Allison Hunter Bailie Gordon Matheson Lord Macfarlane of Bearsden Dr Bridget McConnell (Chief Executive) Councillor Anne McTaggart The Rt Hon George Reid Mr Mel Young Bailie Allan Stewart Attending: Charles Beattie, Director of Finance/Deputy Chief Executive, Susan Deighan, Director of Strategic Planning and Corporate Services James Doherty, Media Manager; Ian Hooper, Director of Special Projects, Jill Miller, Director of Operations; Anne Gilmour, Liaison Officer all Culture and Sport Glasgow. 1 Notice and Quorum. Having noted that relevant notice had been issued and a quorum was present, the Board, agreed to proceed business as hereinafter minuted. 2 Appointment of Chair approved. In terms of Article 62 of the Company’s Articles of Association it was noted that Bailie Elizabeth Cameron had vacated office as Chair of the company at the conclusion of the company’s AGM on 2 September 2009. The Rt Hon George Reid, seconded by Councillor Anne McTaggart moved that the Board re-appoint Bailie Elizabeth Cameron as Chair of the Board. The Board unanimously agreed. GLAS 1552357 v 1 3 Removal and Appointment of Directors noted. There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive advising of recent removal and appointments of Directors of the Culture and Sport Glasgow Board (1) Partner Directors (a) in accordance with article 46 Councillors Stephen Curran and Aileen Colleran had vacated office at the conclusion of the Company’s AGM on 2 September 2009 and were eligible for reappointment under article 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Purcell
    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S MINUTES. Glasgow, 17th April 2009. Executive Committee. Present: Steven Purcell (Chair), James Coleman, Aileen Colleran, Stephen Curran, Alex Dingwall, Frank Docherty, James Dornan, Jonathan Findlay, Archie Graham, Allison Hunter, Matthew Kerr, Elaine McDougall, Jean McFadden, Hanzala Malik, Dr Christopher Mason, Gordon Matheson, Irfan Rabbani, George Redmond, David Ritchie, George Ryan, Alison Thewliss and Martha Wardrop. Also present: Danny Alderslowe, Ruth Black, Philip Braat and Euan McLeod. Apologies: Kenneth Elder, Graeme Hendry, Billy McAllister, Tom McKeown and James McNally. Attending: N Lyttle (Clerk); G Black, Chief Executive; M Doran, Executive Director of Children and Families; S Inch, Executive Director of Development and Regeneration Services; R Booth, Executive Director of Land and Environmental Services; D Crawford, Executive Director of Social Care Services; and M Johnston, Assistant Director of Financial Services. Review of Nursery Admissions and Charging Policy in Early Years Establishments approved – Instruction to Executive Director of Children and Families. 1 With reference to the minutes of 12th September 2008 (Print 4, page 410) approving the Vision and Strategy for Early Childhood Services and Extended Services for 2008-13 and noting that a pilot project would be underpinned by a revised admission and pricing policy, with the conclusion of the pilot being reported to this committee, Councillor Findlay, Executive Member for Education, presented a report regarding a review of the nursery admissions
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 12 June 2008 Session 3 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2008. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by RR Donnelley. CONTENTS Thursday 12 June 2008 Debates Col. EDUCATION CUTS ........................................................................................................................................... 9589 Motion moved—[Rhona Brankin]. Amendment moved—[Fiona Hyslop]. Amendment moved—[Murdo Fraser]. Amendment moved—[Jeremy Purvis]. Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab).............................................................................................................. 9589 The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Fiona Hyslop) ............................................ 9592 Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ............................................................................................. 9595 Jeremy Purvis (Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD) ........................................................................ 9596 Mary Mulligan (Linlithgow) (Lab) ............................................................................................................... 9599 Rob Gibson (Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow City Council
    2007-2008 COUNCIL 2 28th JUNE 2007 287 MINUTES OF GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL Glasgow, 28th June 2007. Glasgow City Council. Present: The Lord Provost (Robert Winter) Chair. DANNY ALDERSLOWE ARCHIE GRAHAM JOHN MASON NINA BAKER PHIL GREENE GORDON MATHESON RUTH BLACK JAHANGIR HANIF DAVID MEIKLE PHILIP BRAAT DOUGLAS HAY ANNE MARIE MILLAR SHAUKAT BUTT GRAEME HENDRY TOMMY MORRISON PAUL CAREY ALLISON HUNTER WILLIAM O’ROURKE ELIZABETH CAMERON ELLEN HURCOMBE MARY PARIS PATRICIA CHALMERS MATTHEW KERR STEVEN PURCELL MARGOT CLARK BILL KIDD IRFAN RABBANI STUART CLAY GERALD LEONARD MOHAMMED RAZAQ PAUL COLESHILL BILLY McALLISTER GEORGE REDMOND AILEEN COLLERAN DAVID McDONALD DAVID RITCHIE STEPHEN CURRAN ELAINE McDOUGALL GEORGE ROBERTS GILBERT DAVIDSON JEAN McFADDEN PAUL ROONEY COLIN DEANS CRAIG MACKAY GEORGE RYAN ALEX DINGWALL JIM MACKECHNIE JAMES SCANLON FRANK DOCHERTY JOHN McKENZIE RUTH SIMPSON SADIE DOCHERTY TOM McKEOWN ALLAN STEWART JAMES DORNAN JOHN McLAUGHLIN ALISON THEWLISS STEPHEN DORNAN KENNY McLEAN GRANT THOMS PATRICIA DUFFY EUAN McLEOD JIM TODD JENNIFER DUNN CATHERINE McMASTER MARTHA WARDROP KENNETH ELDER JAMES McNALLY ALISTAIR WATSON JONATHAN FINDLAY HANZALA MALIK KIERAN WILD JOHN FLANAGAN KHALIL MALIK IRIS GIBSON DR CHRISTOPHER MASON THE LORD DEAN OF GUILD THE DEACON CONVENER Apologies: James Coleman, John Flanagan and Alex Glass. Attending: I Drummond, Solicitor to the Council; R Booth, Executive Director of Land and Environmental Services; L Brown, Executive Director of Financial Services; F Chambers, Executive Director of Direct and Care Services; S Inch, Executive Director of Development and Regeneration Services; R O’Connor, Executive Director (Education, Training and Young People); and D Comley, Director of Social Work Services. COUNCIL 2007-2008 288 28th JUNE 2007 2 Death of former Lady Provost Peggy Lally.
    [Show full text]
  • No.1 for Dental Professionals in Scotland Mike Wise October-November 2013 Hosts a Study Day on Aesthetics Page 21
    Professor No.1 for dental professionals in Scotland Mike Wise October-November 2013 hosts a study day on aesthetics Page 21 On the ball We talk to East Kilbride dentist and Clyde FC director David Macpherson page 22 BOOKMARK THIS DID YOU KNOW? Your Scottish Dental magazine is available LINK TODAY… www.scottishdentalmag.co.uk online with new and exclusive content PLUS regular news updates www.irelandsdentalmag.ie ISSUE 5 VOL. 4 Welcome Editor’s desk with Bruce Oxley Whose business is it? The recent announcement If the individual was level (i.e negligable) then that the ban on HIV positive working outside the rules, the patients involved were dental professionals then he/she will probably no more at risk than they Contents undertaking ‘exposure face some sort of sanction, would be at any other dental October-November 2013 prone procedures’ was to regardless of the outdated practice. be lifted was, as expected, nature of the legislation. The question is this: with NEWS> received favourably by the However, the subsequent the new rules allowing 05 Biting back profession. coverage in the newspapers dentists with HIV to practise with Arthur Dent Dentists, like their medical – with the Daily Mail running again, do patients have a 08 BDA issues colleagues, recognise with the headline ‘More right to know that their budget warning that the advances in anti- than 3,000 patients may dentist is HIV positive, or is 11 A ‘victory for retroviral therapy, allied to have been exposed to it none of their business? human rights’ 15 How to avoid the strict infection control HIV after Scottish dentist My personal feeling is burnout and decontamination contracted infection’ – that, as long as all the protocols employed within raises an interesting, and precautions are being taken, FEATURES> every dental practice, worrying, question.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Purcell
    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S MINUTES. Glasgow, 6th February 2009. Executive Committee. Present: Steven Purcell (Chair), Shaukat Butt, James Coleman, Aileen Colleran, Stephen Curran, Stephen Dornan, Archie Graham, Graeme Hendry, Allison Hunter, Billy McAllister, Elaine McDougall, Gordon Matheson, George Ryan, Ruth Simpson, Grant Thoms and Martha Wardrop. Also present: Ruth Black, Philip Braat, Frank Docherty, Kenneth Elder and Jonathan Findlay. Apologies: James Dornan and Tom McKeown. Attending: N Lyttle (Clerk); I Drummond, Solicitor to the Council; L Brown, Executive Director of Financial Services; F Chambers, Executive Director of Direct and Care Services; M Doran, Executive Director of Children and Families; D Crawford, Executive Director of Social Care Services; M McKenna, Service Director of Education; G Gormal, Assistant Director of Development and Regeneration Services; and T McDonald, Assistant Director of Land and Environmental Services. Monitoring report noted. 1 Councillor Curran, City Treasurer, presented a monitoring report on the investment programme 2008/09 for the period from 1st April to 19th December 2008. After consideration, the committee noted the report. Local Housing Forums – Re-establishment, membership and remit approved. 2 With reference to the minutes of the Housing Development Committee of 8th June 2006 (Print 2, page 223) approving the membership and working arrangements for Local Housing Forums, Councillor Ryan, Executive Member for Development and Regeneration, presented a report regarding proposals for a revised
    [Show full text]
  • Previous Winners
    PREVIOUS WINNERS 2016 WINNERS 2012 WINNERS David Mundell MP - Best Scot at Westminster Michael Moore MP, Best Scot at Westminster Ruth Davidson MSP - Donald Dewar Debater of the Year Dennis Robertson MSP, Donald Dewar Debater of the Year Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP - One to Watch Humza Yousaf MSP, One to Watch Mary Scanlon - Committee MSP of the Year Stewart Hosie MP, Politics in Business Award Jackie Baillie MSP - Community MSP of the Year Councillor Gordon Matheson, Scottish Local Politician of the Year Fergus Ewing MSP - Politics in Business Award Martha Payne, Public Campaign/Campaigner of the Year Johann Lamont MSP - E-Politician Johann Lamont MSP, Political Impact of the Year No to Name Persons (NO2NP) Campaign - Public Campaigner of the Year Nicola Sturgeon MSP, Scottish Politician of the Year Councillor Mark Macmillan - Scottish Local Politician of the Year Rt Hon Lord Campbell of Pittenweem CH CBE PC QC - Lifetime Achievement Award 2011 WINNERS Ruth Davidson MSP - Scottish Politician of the Year Angus Robertson MP, Best Scot at Westminster Nicola Sturgeon MSP, Donald Dewar Debater of the Year 2015 WINNERS Ruth Davidson MSP, Newcomer of the Year Angus Robertson MP - Best Scot at Westminster Councillor Michael Foxley, Highland Council, Scottish Local Willie Rennie MSP - Donald Dewar Debater of the Year Government Politician of the Year Alison McInnes MSP - Committee MSP of the Year Save RAF Lossiemouth, Public Campaign/Campaigner of the Year Neil Findlay MSP - Community MSP of the Year Frank Maguire, Thompsons Solicitors, Lifetime Campaign
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Onitoring Rogramme 2006-08
    EVOLUTION ONITORING ROGRAMME 2006-08 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2009 Paul Cairney (ed.) University of Aberdeen ISSN 1751-3855 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell at The Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Dr Paul Cairney University of Aberdeen Wales: Prof Richard Wyn Jones & Prof Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, Aberystwyth University Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Prof Martin Burch, Prof Alan Harding & Dr James Rees IPEG, University of Manchester The Centre: Prof Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme. All devolution monitoring reports are published at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution- unit/research/devolution/devo-monitoring-programme.html Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2009 Paul Cairney (ed.) Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2009 Introduction 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in New Zealand, Medicon Valley in Scandinavia, Oxfordshire in the United Kingdom, Greg Clark and Madison, Wisconsin, in the United States
    Clusters, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Edited by Jonathan Potter and Gabriela Miranda Clusters,Recession, Innovation Recovery and This publication explores the success of major innovation and entrepreneurship clusters in OECD countries, the challenges they now face in sustaining their positions and the andReinvestment Entrepreneurship : lessons for other places seeking to build successful clusters. What are the key factors for cluster success? What problems are emerging on the horizon? Which is the appropriate Editedthe byrole Jonathan of Potterlocal role of the public sector in supporting the expansion of the cluster and overcoming the and Gabriela Miranda obstacles? economic leadership The book addresses these and other issues, analysing seven internationally reputed clusters in depth: Grenoble in France, Vienna in Austria, Waterloo in Canada, Dunedin in a global crisis in New Zealand, Medicon Valley in Scandinavia, Oxfordshire in the United Kingdom, Greg Clark and Madison, Wisconsin, in the United States. For each cluster, it looks at the factors that have contributed to its growth, the impact of the cluster on local entrepreneurship performance, and the challenges faced for further expansion. It also puts forward a set of policy recommendations geared to the broader context of cluster development. This publication is essential reading for policy makers, practitioners and academics wishing to obtain good practices in cluster development and to enhance the economic impact of clusters. Clusters,Entrepreneurshipand Innovation The full text of this book is available on line via these links: www.sourceoecd.org/employment/9789264044425 www.sourceoecd.org/industrytrade/9789264044425 www.sourceoecd.org/scienceIT/9789264044425 Those with access to all OECD books on line should use this link: www.sourceoecd.org/9789264044425 SourceOECD is the OECD online library of books, periodicals and statistical databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow's Single Outcome Agreement
    Glasgow’s Single Contents • Purpose of the Agreement Outcome • Scope of the Agreement • Developing the Agreement • Governance Agreement • Ongoing Development of the SOA • Community Involvement June 2008 • Local Context for the National Indicators • Performance Management • Public Reporting • Glasgow’s Contribution to National Outcomes 1-15 Glasgow’s Single Outcome Agreement 2008/09-2010/11 It gives me great pleasure to be able to present on behalf of the Glasgow Community Planning Partnership, our first Single Outcome Agreement (SOA) which sets out the key outcomes by which we will measure how we are improving the lives of all those who live, visit and work in the city of Glasgow. Here in Glasgow, we have taken the opportunity to develop our first SOA hand-in-hand with our Community Planning partners to ensure that we are able to derive the maximum benefit that this new approach to assessing public sector improvement presents. In creating our first Single Outcome Agreement, we have taken the opportunity to refocus our commitment to the key objectives that are required to deliver improved benefits and opportunities for the city and its citizens. Improving the services that are delivered across Glasgow’s communities, whether in relation to health, education, employment, community safety etc, cannot be most effectively achieved by any single organisation and the SOA presents a powerful opportunity to strengthen our partnership arrangements and to deliver the more integrated, accessible and cost effective services that the public want and deserve. Glasgow has made great strides in the last decade, particularly with regard to its economic performance and public infrastructure, but much work remains to be done to address inequalities in health, education and employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebecca Gordon Nesbitt
    variant 41 | SPrin G 2011 | 15 Glasgow Life or Death Rebecca Gordon Nesbitt In summer 2008, Variant published an analysis share, including […] Culture and Sport Glasgow”.8 Notes of Culture and Sport Glasgow (CSG), based For those engaged in promoting the city’s image, 1 Rebecca Gordon Nesbitt, ‘The New Bohemia’, Variant, on an examination of its key personnel and such as CSG, this critical coverage was quickly summer 2008, pp. 5-8 http://www.variant.org.uk/pdfs/ the consequences for the city’s culture their followed by yet more negative attention in the issue32/Variant32RGN.pdf ethos implies.1 This research pointed to the national media ensuing from the downfall of the 2 See note 5(3) in Minute of a Meeting of the Board of Directors of CSG27 January 2010. subordination of Glasgow’s culture and leisure leader of Glasgow City Council, Steven Purcell. services to business interests, particularly tourism Before his public disgrace, Labour’s young rising 3 See, for example, note 5(1) in Ibid. and regeneration, which was perceived to have star had been responsible for the creation of 4 http://www.csgwatch.com/ was set up, on 24 November 2009, by David Crowter on behalf of Christian Watch, a detrimental impact on those working in the several council-derived ALEOs and served as a citing an address in Warwickshire. arts and on the long-term welfare of the city’s board member of CSG from its inception.9 In the 5 Melanie Reid, ‘It’s as if they want me executed, says culture and leisure facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2Nd Parliamentary Year
    Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2nd Parliamentary Year, Session 3 (9 May 2008 – 8 May 2009) SPJ 3.2 Foreword The Journal is the central, long-term, authoritative record of what the Parliament has done. The Minutes of Proceedings, which are produced for each meeting of the Parliament, do that in an immediate way, while the Journal presents essentially the same material but has the benefit of hindsight to allow any errors and infelicities of presentation to be corrected. Unlike the Official Report, which primarily records what is said, the Minutes of Proceedings, and in the longer term the Journal, provide the authoritative record of what was done. The Journal is required under Rule 16.3 of Standing Orders and contains, in addition to the Minutes of Proceedings themselves, notice of any Bill introduced*, notice of any instrument or draft instrument or any other document laid before the Parliament; notice of any report of a committee, and any other matter that the Parliament, on a motion of the Parliamentary Bureau, considers should be included. (* The requirement to include notice of Bills introduced was only added to Rule 16.3 in January 2003. However, such notices have in practice been recorded in the Annex to the Minutes of Proceedings from the outset.) Note: (DT), which appears throughout the Journal, signifies a decision taken at Decision Time. Chamber Office Directorate of Clerking and Reporting Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2nd Parliamentary Year, Session 3 (9 May 2008 – 8 May 2009) Contents Page Journal …………………………………………………………………………. 1 Annex A Bills Introduced ………………………………………………………………… 282 Annex B Subordinate Legislation— 1.
    [Show full text]