District of Columbia Board of Professional Engineering
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Committee
International Committee Carol V. Bell Eric D. Cook Chairman Co-Vice Chair Director of International Project Development Regional Manager Stanley Consultants, Inc. Buchart Horn, Inc. 516 Chestnut Hill Ave 609 Cedar Creek Grade Ste D2 Baltimore, MD 21218-2535 Winchester, VA 22601-2721 P: (443)326-4682 P: (540)542-1929 [email protected] F: (540)722-2608 [email protected] Mohan Singh Sam Al-Jamal Co-Vice Chair Committee Member Principal Vice President / Principal-in-Charge AECOM USA, Inc. Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering 430 National Business Pkwy Ste 190 1691 Turnbull Ave Annapolis Junction, MD 20701-1075 Charleston, SC 29405-1944 P: (703)801-0169 P: (714)617-6800 F: (410)379-6901 F: (843)266-3583 [email protected] [email protected] Mary B. Anderson Philios Angelides Committee Member Committee Member Senior Vice President President Schnabel Engineering, Inc. Alpha Corporation 46020 Manekin Plz 21351 Ridgetop Cir, Ste 200 Suite 110 Dulles, VA 20166-6561 Sterling, VA 20166-6639 P: (703)450-0800 (1045) P: (703)779-0773 F: (703)450-0043 F: (703)443-0510 [email protected] [email protected] Loei Badreddine Stacy Bartoletti Committee Member Committee Member Principal President & CEO GRAEF Degenkolb Engineers 125 South 84th Street, Suite 401 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500 Milwaukee, WI 53214-1470 San Francisco, CA 94104-2908 P: (414)259-1500 P: (415)354-6501 F: (414)259-0037 F: (415)981-3157 [email protected] [email protected] International Committee Fredric S. Berger John W. Birkhoff Committee Member Committee Member Chairman Principal The Louis Berger Group, Inc. -
Smart Urban Spaces Optimising Design for Comfort, Safety and Economic Vitality
Smart Urban Spaces Optimising design for comfort, safety and economic vitality Urban planners often ponder over the ways in which people will move through their designs, interact with the environment and with each other, and how best to utilise the spaces provided. Buro Happold’s Smart Space team have proven track record in optimising design of urban spaces and masterplans to enhance Capacity expansion of Makkah during Hajj visitor experience. We understand the benefits obtained from efficient layouts, intuitive wayfinding, and effective operational management. Madinah masterplan, optimising building massing to maximise shading comfort Our consultants enable a better understanding of the impacts of designs. Through the forecasting of movement and activity patterns, tailored to the specific use, our pedestrian flow modelling informs design and management in order to optimise the use of urban spaces and enhance user experience. The resulting designs are therefore extensively tested with a minimised risk of undesirable and/or unsafe congestion. We help clients better understand existing activity patterns Cardiff city centre masterplan and/or visitor preferences. With a holistic look at pedestrian and Footfall analysis of St Giles Circus, London vehicular desire lines, we can formulate a strategy to encourage footfall through the new developments. Accurate modelling provides a basis on which to assess potential risks and implement counter measures to negative factors such as poor access, fear of crime, inadequate parking facilities and lack of signage. In addition, it allows us to optimise the placement of activities – for example, placing retail in areas where the most footfall is expected; identifying appropriate spaces to locate other social activities; etc. -
Global Design Sprints: How to Reimagine Our Streets in an Era of Autonomous Vehicles
GLOBAL DESIGN SPRINTS: HOW TO REIMAGINE OUR STREETS IN AN ERA OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES OUTCOMES FROM CITIES AROUND THE WORLD URBAN STREETS IN THE AGE OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES CONTENTS - 2017 - GLOBAL DESING SPRINT OUTCOMES 2 Global Design Sprints - 2017 URBAN STREETS IN THE AGE OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 1. INTRODUCTION Technological advancement for autonomous vehicles accelerated in 2015 Using this format, we hosted a series of global events to speculate and The following report is the result of this series of Global Design Sprints and, suddenly, everyone was talking about a future of autonomous and brainstorm the question of : – a collaboration of 138 sprinters from across the world. The executive connected vehicles. At BuroHappold, we wanted to understand what summary compares the different discussions and outcomes of the Sprints it might mean for our cities. How will our cities be impacted? Will there ‘HOW CAN URBAN STREETS BE RECLAIMED AND REIMAGINED and summarizes some of the key takeaways we collected. The ideas that be more or less traffic? Which ownership model for autonomous and THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF CONNECTED AND emerged range from transforming a residential neighbourhood from a car- connected vehicles will prevail? These are questions that many have asked, AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES?‘ zone to a care-zone to the introduction of the flexible use of a road bridge but no one can really answer today – even with the most sophisticated based on the demand from commuters, tourists, cyclists, and vehicular forecasting models. We cannot predict how people will respond to such a By bringing together people from the technology sector, the urban traffic. -
PE Individuals 013013 1
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2013 PE REG. NAME COMPANY NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NO. ABBASZADEH RAMIN GREY FOX CONSULTING, INC. 57 COOPER AVE CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002 7978 ABDELRHMAN MOHAMED A. 303 GREENWICH AVE, #A-222 WARWICK, RI 02886 5823 ABEL DENNIS D. 61655 KINGSTON COURT SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 7739 ABELY JAMES J. 354 BEACON STREET #4 BOSTON, MA 02116 5380 ABRAHAMS MICHAEL J. 7 NORTH ST OLD GREENWICH, CT 06870 6933 ABRAMS TED A. 117 KELEKENT LANE CARY, NC 27518 9329 ABSHAGEN TIMOTHY C. 11211 FALL GARDEN LANE KNOXVILLE, TN 37932 9070 ABU-YASEIN OMAR ALI A & A ENGINEERING 5911 RENAISSANCE PL, STE B TOLEDO, OH 43623 8380 ADAJIAN EDWARD ADAJIAN ENGINEERING, INC. 50 ALBANY TURNPIKE CANTON, CT 06019 4908 ADAMEDES THOMAS C. 500 BROADWAY NEWPORT, RI 02840 3621 ADAMO CARL J. 66 GRANDVIEW AVENUE LINCOLN, RI 02865 4211 ADAMS CHRISTOPHER J. NELCO ENGINEERING 12400 COIT RD, STE 510 DALLAS, TX 75251 9578 ADAMS JASON C. JASON C. ADAMS, PE SUITE 5268 1805 N 2ND STREET ROGERS, AR 72756 9381 ADAMS ROBERT B. METCALF & EDDY, INC. 701 EDGEWATER DR WAKEFIELD, MA 01880 7159 ADAMS SCOTT N. ADVANCED ENGINEERING GROUP, PC 500 NORTH BROADWAY EAST PROVIDENCE, RI 02914 8120 ADDISON JOHN D. 1280 W Peachtree St NW, #3403 ATLANTA, GA 30309 9380 ADEEB KAREEM 71 OLD FARM RD FAIRFIELD, CT 06825-2033 6355 ADELSBEmRGER CHARLES 60 LORRAINE METCALF DRIVE WRENTHAM, MA 02093 5824 AGBAYANI NESTOR A. AGBAYANI STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 1201 24TH STREET, SUITE B110-116 BAKERFIELD, CA 93301-2391 9753 AGHJAYAN DOUGLAS J. GEI CONSULTANTS, INC. -
Read the SPUR 2012-2013 Annual Report
2012–2013 Ideas and action Annual Report for a better city For the first time in history, the majority of the world’s population resides in cities. And by 2050, more than 75 percent of us will call cities home. SPUR works to make the major cities of the Bay Area as livable and sustainable as possible. Great urban places, like San Francisco’s Dolores Park playground, bring people together from all walks of life. 2 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 3 It will determine our access to economic opportunity, our impact on the planetary climate — and the climate’s impact on us. If we organize them the right way, cities can become the solution to the problems of our time. We are hard at work retrofitting our transportation infrastructure to support the needs of tomorrow. Shown here: the new Transbay Transit Center, now under construction. 4 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 5 Cities are places of collective action. They are where we invent new business ideas, new art forms and new movements for social change. Cities foster innovation of all kinds. Pictured here: SPUR and local partner groups conduct a day- long experiment to activate a key intersection in San Francisco’s Mid-Market neighborhood. 6 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 SPUR Annual Report 2012–13 7 We have the resources, the diversity of perspectives and the civic values to pioneer a new model for the American city — one that moves toward carbon neutrality while embracing a shared prosperity. -
Nuclear Weapon Producers
Chapter 2 Nuclear Weapon Producers Nuclear weapon producers in this report Aecom (United States) Alliant Techsystems (United States) Babcock & Wilcox (United States) Babcock International (United Kingdom) BAE Systems (United Kingdom) Bechtel (United States) Bharat Electronics (India) Boeing (United States) CH2M Hill (United States) EADS (Netherlands) Fluor (United States) Gencorp (United States) General Dynamics (United States) Honeywell International (United States) Huntington Ingalls (United States) Jacobs Engineering (United States) Larsen & Toubro (India) Lockheed Martin (United States) Northrop Grumman (United States) Rockwell Collins (United States) Rolls-Royce (United Kingdom) Safran (France) In some of the nuclear-armed states – especially the SAIC (United States) United States, the United Kingdom and France – Serco (United Kingdom) governments award contracts to private companies to Thales (France) ThyssenKrupp (Germany) carry out work on their nuclear arsenals. This report URS (United States) looks at 27 of those companies providing the necessary infrastructure to develop, test, maintain and modernise nuclear arsenals. They are involved in producing or maintaining nuclear weapons or significant, specific components thereof. The 27 companies described in this chapter are substantially involved in the nuclear weapons programmes of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, India or Israel and themselves based in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Germany and India. In other nuclear-armed countries – such as Russia, China, Pakistan and North Korea – the modernization of nuclear forces is carried out primarily or exclusively by government agencies. In those countries, the opportunities to achieve divestment through public campaigning are limited. A potentially more effective way to challenge investments in these nuclear industries would be through influencing budgetary decision-making processes in national legislatures. -
Delivering Building Performance
MAY 2016 Full Report DELIVERING BUILDING PERFORMANCE With thanks to sponsors: © 2016 UK Green Building Council Registered charity number 1135153 Delivering Building Performance | 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Overcoming barriers to delivering building performance 9 Conclusion 28 C-Suite Headlines 30 References 32 Delivering Building Performance | 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT STEERING GROUP Project steering group: ■ Julian Sutherland, Cundall (formerly Atkins): Project Chair ■ Lynne Ceeney, Lytton Consulting: Project Manager on behalf of UK-GBC ■ Chris van Dronkelaar, BuroHappold/UCL: Project Researcher ■ Mark Allen, Saint Gobain ■ John Davies, Derwent London ■ Emma Hines, Tarmac ■ Judit Kimpian, AHR ■ Duncan Price, BuroHappold ■ Sarah Ratcliffe, Better Buildings Partnership UK-GBC is grateful to project sponsors, Buro Happold, Saint Gobain and Tarmac. INTERVIEWEES Interviewees were drawn from the following sectors: Investors, developers, owner occupiers, leasing occupiers, managing agents, facilities managers, professional services, manufacturers and membership organisations. We would like to specifically thank: ■ BRE (Andy Lewry) ■ Canary Wharf Group (Dave Hodge, Rita Margarido and Lugano Kapembwa) ■ The Crown Estate (Jane Wakiwaka) ■ Derwent London (John Davies) ■ Hoare Lea (Julie Godefroy) ■ IES (Sarah Graham and Naghman Khan) ■ John Lewis Partnership (Phil Birch) ■ Land Securities (Caroline Hill and Neil Pennell) ■ Legal and General (Debbie Hobbs) ■ Lend Lease (Hannah Kershaw) ■ Marks and Spencer (Kate Neale) ■ M J Mapp (Carl Brooks) ■ Tarmac (Tim Cowling) ■ UPP (James Sandie) ■ Wilkinson Eyre (Gary Clark) ■ Participants in the UK-GBC seminar at Ecobuild ■ Participants in the Edge seminar at Ecobuild Executive Summary Delivering Building Performance | 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The performance in operation, of the vast majority of our buildings, is simply not commensurate with the challenge of meeting our carbon targets. -
Where Do You Experience Both the Journey and the Destination?
WHERE DO YOU EXPERIENCE BOTH THE JOURNEY AND THE DESTINATION? ANAHEIM REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL CENTER SMARTER FASTER I NTEGRATED SOLUTIONS FOR CIVIC ARCHITECTURE VISION To catalyze transit-oriented growth, Orange County envisioned a world-class gateway linking regional transportation systems, providing convenient access to the area’s renowned destinations, and offering distinctive restaurants, shops and events. The iconic, LEED Platinum landmark embodies the region’s commitment to a vital, sustainable future. CHALLENGE As a modern multi-modal transportation hub designed to connect eight existing public and private transportation systems as well as future streetcar and high-speed rail lines, ARTIC involved extensive coordination of complex infrastructure. When combined with aggressive sustainability targets— including 30% reduction of both energy and water use—and the desire for a landmark design, the project demanded a fully integrated design solution to achieve project goals within budget tolerances. SOLUTION Taking a holistic design approach using BIM and advanced computational design and analysis tools allowed the design team to propose a complex catenary-shaped enclosure employing lightweight ETFE panels. In addition to optimizing the design for energy performance and constructability, the models facilitated cost estimating, construction sequencing, just-in-time ordering, and digital fabrication. VALUE The integrated solution leveraged the ETFE enclosure to address multiple goals. The translucent and insulating panels with varied frit patterns maximized daylight while reducing solar heat gain. Equally important, at just one-tenth the weight of glass, these lightweight panels required a less costly steel support structure. The modeling also enabled strategies for natural ventilation and water recycling that will reduce resource consumption and operating costs over time. -
JACOBS ENGINEERING a Leading Engineering and Construction Company Aligned with Megatrends
Date: 17/05/2021 v01. RA/LW ANALYSIS NOTE – 17 May 2021 JACOBS ENGINEERING A Leading Engineering and Construction Company aligned with Megatrends 1. LEADER IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION 2. AREAS OF ACTIVITY 3. COMPANY ORGANIZATION 4. SWOT ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 5. CONCLUSION 1. Leader in Engineering & Construction Jacobs Engineering is is an American international technical professional services firm. The company is a global provider of engineering, design, procurement, construction, and maintenance services as well as cyber engineering and security solutions. The firm serves industrial, commercial, and government clients in a wide variety of sectors, including water, transportation, healthcare, technology, and chemicals. Jacobs Engineering provides consulting, technical, scientific, and project delivery services for the government and private sectors in the United States, Europe, Canada, India, rest of Asia, Australia, New Zealand, South America, Mexico, the Middle East, and Africa. Jacobs Engineering employs approximately 55,000 workers. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. was founded in 1947 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. 2. Areas of Activity The company focuses in delivering sustainable solutions such as: - Energy Transition - Sustainable Transport - Net Zero Development - Resource Management - Climate Resilience - Infrastructure Adaptation - Hydrogen Economy - Social Value Jacobs Engineering 17 May 2021 1 Date: 17/05/2021 v01. RA/LW Project Examples: • Energy Transition. SuedLink – Integrating renewable sources into Germany’s electricity grid to support 2050 target of 80% of power provided by clean energy. • Sustainable Transport. King Country Metro – New battery electric bus (BEB) facilities will support the goal of a 100% zero-emissions fleet powered by renewable energy no later than 2040. • Net Zero Development. -
Design Checks for Electrical Services
A BSRIA Guide www.bsria.co.uk Design Checks for Electrical Services A quality control framework for electrical engineers By Kevin Pennycook Supported by BG 3/2006 Design considerations Design issues Calculations Systems and equipment PREFACE Donald Leeper OBE The publication of Design Checks for Electrical Services is a welcome addition to the well received and highly acclaimed Design Checks for HVAC, published in 2002. The design guidance sheets provide information on design inputs, outputs and practical watch points for key building services design topics. The guidance given complements that in CIBSE Guide K, Electricity in Buildings, and is presented in a format that can be easily incorporated into a firm’s quality assurance procedures. From personal experience I have seen the benefit of such quality procedures. Once embedded within a process information management system, the guidance in this book will ensure consistent and high quality design information. When used for validation and verification, the design checks and procedures can also make a key contribution to a risk management strategy. The easy-to-follow layout and the breadth of content makes Design Checks for Electrical Services a key document for all building services engineers. Donald Leeper OBE President, CIBSE 2005-06 Consultant, Zisman Bowyer and Partners LLP DESIGN CHECKS FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICES © BSRIA BG 3/2006 Design considerations Design issues Calculations Systems and equipment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS BSRIA would like to thank the following sponsors for their contributions to this application guide: Griffiths and Armour Professional Risk hurleypalmerflatt Atkins Consultants Limited Mott MacDonald Limited Faber Maunsell EMCOR Group (UK) plc Bovis Lend Lease Limited The project was undertaken under the guidance of an industry steering group. -
• Annual Revie%
Nor — 1.3 , • ' +. • /1 111W • • " 1.74, - Amp --"P= ' • k 1 • - • -4 st :.i;, ' „ , •-• Engineers Without Borders U14 I t. , 4 Annual Revie% September 2005 - August 200( te o f IL)ridge anchor in rural Malawi supported by an EWE3,-UK bursary [Daniel Carrkvic Mission To facilitate human development through engineering. Introduction Aims • To educate and raise awareness of students and others about issues in Annual Review human development; * to promote research related to, and actively contribute towards, engineering Engineers Without Borders UK is a student-run charity whose focus is on technical solutions for human development; contributions to international development. This report summarises our main • provide an ongoing supply of competent and knowledgeable professional activities for the academic year from September 2005 to August 2006. development workers, and; • to become a mark of excellence for those looking to become involved with The highlights are reported by our members, branch committee members and development work. core co-ordinators in the following sections: 1 - Introduction: Mission and Chief Executives' Summary Approach 3 - Our Team: EWB-UK Core Team, Trustees, Branches and Professional Network • Training and educating students and recent graduates in development theory 7 - Training and practice; 8 - Awareness: Events, Publicity and Education • using student volunteers and academics to undertake research; 9 - Placements • making use of professional volunteers to support our work; 11 - Research • providing suitable -
Program Committee 6:30 Pm – 9:30 Pm Shoes
2862_AM_fin_prog_cover_v1.qxd 2/7/08 4:28 PM Page 1 Advanced Aromatics, LP Afton Chemicals Corporation Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Albemarle Corporation Alon USA, LP American Ref Group, Inc. Arkema Ashland, Inc. Baker Petrolite Corporation Basell North America BASF Corporation BAYER BOC GROUP Border Refinin pany BP Chemicals BP p.l.c. Cabot Corporation Calcasieu Refining Company Calumet Lubricants Celanese Ltd. Chevron Corporation Chev Phillips Chemical Company LP CHS Inc. CITGO Petroleum Corporation Coffeyville Resources LLC ConocoPhillips Countrymark Co-op Ass Criterion Catalysts & Technologies Cross Oil Refining & Marketing, Inc. Cytec Industries Delek Inc.San Deltech Diego, Corporation CA The Dow Chemical pany E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. Eastman Chemical Company Enterprise Products Ergon, Inc. Exxon Mobil Corporation ExxonMobil Ch Co. Flying J Inc. Formosa Plastics Corporation, USA Frontier Oil Corporation Gary-Williams Energy Corporation GE Plastics GE Water & Pr Technologies Georgia Gulf Giant Industries, Inc. Grace Davison Hess Corporation Holly Corporation Honeywell Inc. HOVENSA LLC Hunt R Company Huntsman Company LLC INEOS Kinder Morgan Koch Industries Lion Oil Company Lubrizol Corporation Lyondell Chemical Com LYONDELL-CITGO Refining, LP Marathon Petroleum Company LLC Merichem Company Montana Refining Company Motiva Enterprises L Murphy Oil USA, Inc. Nalco Company National Cooperative Refinery Assoc. NOVA Chemicals Corporation Occidental Chemical Corporation Chlor Alkali Products Pasadena Refining System, Inc. Placid Refining Company PPG Industries, Inc. Rohm and Haas Company Safety-Klee Corporation Sasol North America Shell Chemical Company Sinclair Oil Corporation Solutia Inc. Sonneborn, Inc. South Hampton Resources Chemicals Suncor Energy Inc. Sunoco Inc. Tesoro Corporation Texas Petrochemicals LP TOTAL Trigeant, Ltd. U.S.