Scotland Act 1998 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 16 September 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Tribunal) (Former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) Order 2001
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2001 No. 2563 UNITED NATIONS The United Nations (International Tribunal) (Former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) Order 2001 Made ------- 18th July 2001 Laid before Parliament - - - 19th July 2001 Laid before the Scottish Parliament 19th July 2001 Coming into force ----- 1stSeptember 2001 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 18th day of July 2001 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council Whereas under article 41 of the Charter of the United Nations the Security Council of the United Nations, by a resolution adopted on 25th May 1993, called upon Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom and all other States to apply certain measures to give effect to a decision of that Council in relation to the Former Yugoslavia: And whereas, under section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946(a) (“the 1946 Act”) Her Majesty may, by Order in Council, make such provision as appears to her necessary or expedient for enabling those measures to be effectively applied: And whereas, on 13th March 1996, Her Majesty made the United Nations (International Tribunal) (Former Yugoslavia) Order 1996(b) (“the 1996 Order”), which was laid before Parliament on 14th March 1996 and came into force on 15th March 1996: And whereas, under section 1(3) of the 1946 Act, any Order in Council made under section 1 of the 1946 Act may be varied or revoked by a subsequent Order in Council: Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred upon Her by section 1 of the 1946 Act, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows:— Citation, commencement and extent 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the United Nations (International Tribunal) (Former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) Order 2001 and shall come into force on 1st September 2001. -
Scotland and the UK Constitution
Scotland and the UK Constitution The 1998 devolution acts brought about the most significant change in the constitution of the United Kingdom since at least the passage of the 1972 European Communities Act. Under those statutes devolved legislatures and administrations were created in Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The documents below have been selected to give an overview of the constitutional settlement established by the devolution acts and by the Courts. Scotland has been chosen as a case study for this examination, both because the Scottish Parliament has been granted the most extensive range of powers and legislative competences of the three devolved areas, but also because the ongoing debate on Scottish independence means that the powers and competencies of the Scottish Parliament are very much live questions. The devolution of certain legislative and political powers to Scotland was effected by the Scotland Act 1998. That statute, enacted by the Westminster Parliament, creates the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Executive (now the “Scottish Government”), and establishes the limits on the Parliament’s legislative competence. Schedule 5 of the Act, interpolated by Section 30(1), lists those powers which are reserved to the Westminster Parliament, and delegates all other matters to the devolved organs. Thus, while constitutional matters, foreign affairs, and national defence are explicitly reserved to Westminster, all matters not listed— including the education system, the health service, the legal system, environmental -
Argyll and Bute Council Council Legal and Regulatory Support 24 June 2021 Boundaries Scotland
ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL COUNCIL LEGAL AND REGULATORY SUPPORT 24 JUNE 2021 BOUNDARIES SCOTLAND - REVIEW OF ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 A report was submitted to the Council meeting held on 24 September 2020, detailing the terms of a proposed response to Boundaries Scotland’s initial consultation, which ran for a 2 month period from 16th July to 30th September 2020, in regard to the 2019 Review of Electoral Arrangements for Argyll and Bute Council area. The Council agreed the response and this was submitted in accordance with the 30th September 2020 deadline. 1.2 Following the initial consultation with the Council, Boundaries Scotland considered our response and developed proposals for public consultation, which ran for a 12 week period between November 2020 and January 2021. 1.3 Having considered all the comments submitted as part of the public consultation, Boundaries Scotland have now published their final proposals for Argyll and Bute Council area and a copy of the report to Scottish Ministers is attached at appendix 1. If Scottish Ministers are content with the report, it is anticipated that the proposals will be implemented ready for the Local Government elections in May 2022. 1.4 In line with section 18(3) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 the Council will make copies of the report available for public inspection at suitable locations and will be publicised on the Council website from 10 June 2021 until 6 months after the making of an Order in the Scottish Parliament giving effect to any proposals in the report. 2. -
You Never Saw a Fish on the Wall with Its Mouth Shut
IAN WINTER QC YOU NEVER SAW A FISH ON THE WALL WITH ITS MOUTH SHUT THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION AND THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL IN R V K [2009] EWCA CRIM 1640 ISSUE NINE WINTER 2009 PUBLISHED BY CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS Nicholas Purnell QC Richard Horwell QC John Kelsey-Fry QC Timothy Langdale QC Ian Winter QC Jonathan Barnard Clare Sibson Cloth Fair Chambers specialises in fraud and commercial crime, complex and organised crime, regulatory and disciplinary matters, defamation and in broader litigation areas where specialist advocacy and advisory skills are required. 2 CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS IAN WINTER QC YOU NEVER SAW A FISH ON THE WALL WITH ITS MOUTH SHUT1 THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION AND THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL IN R V K [2009] EWCA CRIM 1640 ISSUE NINE WINTER 2009 PUBLISHED BY CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS 1 Unreliably attributed to Sally Berger but the true origin is unclear. King John, pressured by the barons and threatened with insurrection, reluctantly signs the great charter on the Thames island of Runnymede CLOTH FAIR CHAMBERS he fish on the wall has its mouth open unreliable testimony produced as a result of it. because it couldn’t resist the temptation to open it when the occasion appeared to Had paragraph 38 of Magna Carta remained the law, which justify doing so. There are few convicted could have been the case even once the use of torture had defendants who likewise could resist the been outlawed2, the question over the admissibility of the temptation to open their mouths and accused’s statement would not have been whether the Tthereby assist their prosecutors with their own words. -
Review of Electoral Arrangements - Na H-Eileanan an Iar Council Area Final Proposals
POLICY AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE 23 JUNE 2021 REVIEW OF ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS - NA H-EILEANAN AN IAR COUNCIL AREA FINAL PROPOSALS Report by Chief Executive PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of the Report is to inform Members of Boundary Scotland’s final proposals resulting from the review of electoral arrangements for the Comhairle area. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 Boundaries Scotland commenced a review of the Comhairle area in January 2019. Boundaries Scotland consulted the Comhairle on their initial proposals between March and May 2019. The initial proposals were based on an electoral arrangement for 28 councillors representing one 1-member ward, five 2- member wards, three 3-members wards and two 4-member wards. The Comhairle supported the initial proposals and proposed some minor changes to ward boundaries which better reflected local ties. Boundaries Scotland agreed to adopt the Comhairle’s proposed changes to the initial proposals. 2.2 The final proposals are unchanged from the initial proposals apart from a 2-member rather than a 1- member ward for Barraigh agus Bhatarsaigh. The final proposals have been submitted to Scottish Ministers and, subject to approval by the Scottish Parliament, will come into effect for the 2022 Comhairle elections. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 It is recommended that the Comhairle note the Report. Contact Officer: Derek Mackay – Governance and Election Manager Appendix: Boundaries Scotland review of electoral arrangements – Na h-Eileanan an Iar Council Area Background Papers: Report to Policy and Resources Committee on 2 May 2019 IMPLICATIONS 4.1 The following implications are applicable in terms of the Report. Resource Implications Implications/None Financial The reduction in the number of councillors will present a saving to the Comhairle. -
1 European and External Relations Committee
European and External Relations Committee Human Rights Inquiry Clan Childlaw About Clan Childlaw Clan Childlaw offers a unique legal advocacy service to children and young people. We are lawyers delivering free legal advice and representation to children and young people, who would otherwise have found it very difficult or impossible to access the legal help that they require. We help Children & Young People up to the age of 18, or 21 if they have been Looked After Children. We deliver specialist training in child law including the following subjects: Children’s Rights in Scots Law; Children’s Hearings; Child Protection and the Law; Looked After Children; Sexual Offences: Children & Young People; Giving Evidence in Court; and A Journey through Care – the legal perspective. We contribute to policy development in relation to the realisation of rights for children and young people across Scotland through our evidence based Policy Development Unit. With the insight gained from our direct legal representation of children and young people, we can (a) offer a unique perspective and (b) use our legal knowledge, skills and expertise to advance policy and its implementation. (1) What is your general view on the UK Government’s proposal to introduce a British Bill of Rights to replace the Human Rights Act 1998? Do you think changes need to be made to the current human rights regime in the UK? No. From a children’s rights point of view protection under ECHR as implemented by the Human Rights Act 1998 by the United Kingdom Parliament and as interpreted by the UK courts with reference to decisions of the European Court of Human Rights is a far clearer application of accepted Human Rights. -
In Re Lehman Bros International (Europe) (No 4) (Ch D)[2014] 3 WLR
466 In re Lehman Bros International (Europe) (No 4) (Ch D)[2014] 3 WLR Chancery Division A In re Lehman Bros International (Europe) (in administration) (No 4) [2014] EWHC 704 (Ch) B 2013 Nov 12—15, 18—20; David Richards J 2014 March 14 Insolvency Ñ Administration Ñ Distribution of assets Ñ Ranking of claims which might be made against available assets of unlimited company after payment of general unsecured unsubordinated creditors Ñ Potential liability of members for liabilities of company Ñ Relationship between liability as members and claims as creditors Ñ Whether claim of subordinated debt holder ranking ahead of or C behind statutory interest Ñ Whether claim ranking ahead of or behind foreign currency conversion claims Ñ Whether foreign currency conversion claims payable out of assets Ñ Whether contractual interest provable or statutory interest payable for period of administration if immediately followed by liquidation Ñ Whether members liability to contribute in liquidation limited to funds required to pay debts and liabilities proved in liquidation Ñ Whether contributory rule applying in administration Ñ Insolvency Act 1986 (c 45) D (as amended by Companies Act 2006 (Consequential Amendments, Transitional Provisions and Savings Order 2009 (SI 2009/1941), Sch 1, para 75(3)), ss 74, 189 Ñ Insolvency Rules 1986 (SI 1986/1925) (as amended by Insolvency (Amendment) Rules 2003 (SI 2003/1730), Sch 1, para 9 and Insolvency (Amendment) Rules 2005 (SI 2005/1730), r 12), r 2.88(1)(7) The applicants were the joint administrators of three companies in the same E group: LBIE, the principal trading company, which was an unlimited company, and its two members, LBL and LBHI2. -
Dear IP 48 Coverpage, December 2010
Dear IP April 2020 – Issue No 94 Insolvency Practitioner Regulation Section 16th Floor 1 Westfield Avenue Stratford London E20 1HZ Tel: 020 7291 6771 www.gov.uk/government/organisations/insolvency- service DEAR INSOLVENCY PRACTITIONER Issue 94 – April 2020 Message from Angela Crossley, Head of Insolvency Practitioner Regulation Dear Reader Please fined enclosed the latest main issue of Dear IP. The Insolvency Service is also issuing weekly publications to our readership regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the information provided is accurate, the contents of Dear IP are, unless stated otherwise, the view of the Insolvency Service, and articles are not a full and authoritative statement of law Dear IP April 2020– Issue No 94 In this issue: Information/Notes page(s): Chapter 12 Gazette and Advertisement Article 10 Placing Gazette notices: a reminder Chapter 13 General Article 102 Joint statement from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), warning insolvency practitioners and FCA-authorised firms to be responsible when dealing with personal data Article 103 Insolvency Code of Ethics Chapter 15 Insolvency Rules, Regulations and Orders Article 67 An increase in the cap on the prescribed part with effect from 6 April 2020 – The Insolvency Act 1986 (Prescribed Part) (Amendment) Order 2020 Dear IP April 2020 – Issue No 94 Chapter 12 - Gazette and Advertisement 10) Placing Gazette notices: a reminder As an authorised notice placer, insolvency practitioners can place insolvency notices in The Gazette via email, post, fax, web form or XML. -
Scottish Elections (Reform) Bill
Scottish Elections (Reform) Bill Marshalled List of Amendments selected for Stage 3 The Bill will be considered in the following order— Sections 1 to 36 Schedule Long Title Amendments marked * are new (including manuscript amendments) or have been altered. Section 6 Graeme Dey 1 In section 6, page 3, line 41, after <(10)> insert <– (i) in the opening words,> Graeme Dey 2 In section 6, page 3, line 41, at end insert— <(ii) after paragraph (a) insert— “(aa) the arrangements made under the scheme assisted disabled persons (within the meaning of section 6(2) of the Equality Act 2010) to vote at the elections,”,> Graeme Dey 3 Divide section 6 into two sections, the first (Electronic voting) to consist of subsections (1) to (3) and the second (Evaluation of pilot schemes) to consist of subsection (4) After section 6 Colin Smyth 16 After section 6, insert— <Feasibility study: form of ballot papers Feasibility study: form of ballot papers (1) The Scottish Minsters may, by regulations provide for a feasibility study for indents on ballot papers or any other identification method for voters who are blind or partially- sighted. (2) A local authority may submit a proposal to the Scottish Minister to carry out a feasibility study as mentioned in subsection (1) in the local authority’s area. SP Bill 53A-ML 1 Session 5 (2020) (3) On receiving a proposal under subsection (2), the Scottish Ministers may by regulations authorise a local authority to carry out a feasibility study. (4) Regulations made under this section may— (a) specify how a local authority is to submit a proposal to carry out a feasibility study to the Scottish Ministers, (b) confer on a local authority the power to carry out a feasibility study, (c) make different provisions for different purposes. -
(United Nations Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2001
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2001 No. 3366 UNITED NATIONS The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2001 Made ----- 9thOctober 2001 Laid before Parliament 9th October 2001 Coming into force - - 10th October 2001 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 9th day of October 2001 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council Whereas under Article 41 of the Charter of the United Nations the Security Council of the United Nations has, by a resolution adopted on 28th September 2001, called upon Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom and all other States to apply certain measures to give effect to decisions of that Council in relation to combating terrorist activities: Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred on Her by section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946(a), is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows: Citation, commencement, operation, extent and amendment 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2001 and shall come into force on 10th October 2001. (2) If the Security Council of the United Nations takes any decision which has the effect of cancelling or postponing or suspending the operation of the resolution adopted by it on 28th September 2001, in whole or in part, this Order shall cease to have effect or its operation shall be postponed or suspended, in whole or in part, as the case may be, in accordance with that decision. (3) Particulars of the decisions referred to in paragraph (2) above shall be published by the Governor in a notice in the official gazette of the Territory. -
Can a Struggling Company Ever Justify Paying Some - but Not All - of Its Creditors?
CAN A STRUGGLING COMPANY EVER JUSTIFY PAYING SOME - BUT NOT ALL - OF ITS CREDITORS? In light of the financially fragile state some businesses are finding themselves in as result of COVID-19, we discuss in this briefing note when – if ever – payments or other benefits can be given to some creditors but not others, and when such a transaction might fall foul of the unlawful preference provisions of UK insolvency legislation. This is a fast-moving area and this briefing note sets out the position as at 7 April 2020. WHY ARE TRANSACTIONS CHALLENGED? When a company enters a formal insolvency procedure, the insolvency practitioner appointed Unlawful preference as liquidator or administrator of the company will review the transactions into which the transactions can be company entered in the run-up to its insolvency. They will then assess whether any of those unwound, leading to transactions might be challenged under the ‘antecedent transactions’ provisions of UK court orders to repay insolvency legislation. This provides an opportunity to bring money or other assets back into funds or return the company’s estate, which increases the pool of assets from which a distribution can be property. made to the company’s creditors. WHAT IS AN UNLAWFUL PREFERENCE? An unlawful preference can be challenged by an administrator or liquidator under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the “Insolvency Act”). Under these provisions, a company gives a preference if: • the company does anything (or suffers anything to be done) which has the effect of putting -
Devolution, Debate and Change: Changing the UK’S Constitutional Settlements Carol Howells and Edwin Parks
Chapter 2 Devolution, debate and change: Changing the UK’s constitutional settlements Carol Howells and Edwin Parks Abstract Devolution has been ‘a process not an event’ resulting in new constitutional settlements . This chapter covers the processes of devolution, processes which mirror the first 50 years of the Open University and the first 22 years of the OU Law School. The chapter explores the devolution of powers to parliaments in Scotland and Wales. It begins with the referendums of the early 1970s and traces events leading up to both the initial transfer of powers and those resulting in subsequent transfer of powers. The process has not been without its critics and the use of differing models helped create complexity re-enforcing historical legacies. Devolution created new legal orders and challenged accepted traditional constitutional theory. The story is not yet over. 1. Introduction The establishment of The Open University (OU) in 1969 changed the landscape of higher education in the United Kingdom (UK). Its mission of being ‘Open to people, places, methods and ideas’1 and its promotion of social justice through high quality education2 has challenged thinking around educational practices. In the 50 years since it was established it has transformed the lives of many through its work and partnerships. It has students in over 90% of UK postcodes3 and continues to hold a unique position within the UK’s Higher Education sector working across, and receiving funding from, all four UK nations. In celebrating its 50th anniversary its Vice Chancellor expressed pride in being the UK’s only four nations university.4 During the OU’s 50-year history there have been significant changes and challenges within the higher education landscape.