DOCSLIB.ORG

Ensuring Environmental Access Rights in the Caribbean: Analysis of Selected Case Law 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ensuring Environmental Access Rights in the Caribbean: Analysis of Selected Case Law 3 Ensuring environmental access rights in the Caribbean: analysis of selected case law 3 Ensuring environmental access rights in the Caribbean Analysis of selected case law Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/suscripciones Ensuring environmental access rights in the Caribbean Analysis of selected case law This document is a joint publication of the Caribbean Court of Justice Academy of Law (CCJ Academy of Law) and the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Justice Winston Anderson, Judge of the Caribbean Court of Justice, and David Barrio Lamarche, Environmental Affairs Officer of the Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division of ECLAC, prepared this publication with support from Alicia Carter, Research Assistant of the Caribbean Court of Justice, and Carlos de Miguel and Valeria Torres, respectively Chief and Economic Affairs Officer of the Policies for Sustainable Development Unit of the Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division of ECLAC. The document was prepared under the overall supervision of Joseluis Samaniego, Chief of the Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division of ECLAC. The rulings contained in this document are available at the Observatory on Principle 10 in Latin America and the Caribbean: http://observatoriop10.cepal.org/en. This document was prepared with financial support from the United Nations Development Account under the project “Addressing critical socio-environmental challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean”. United Nations publication LC/TS.2018/31/Rev.1 Distribution: L Original: English Copyright © United Nations, 2018 / © Caribbean Court of Justice, 2018 All rights reserved Printed at United Nations, Santiago S.18-00510 This publication should be cited as: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) and Caribbean Court of Justice Academy of Law (CCJ Academy of Law), Ensuring environmental access rights in the Caribbean: analysis of selected case law (LC/TS.2018/31/Rev.1), Santiago, 2018. Applications for authorization to reproduce this work in whole or in part should be sent to the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Publications and Web Services Division, [email protected]. Member States and their governmental institutions may reproduce this work without prior authorization, but are requested to mention the source and to inform ECLAC of such reproduction. Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Chapter I Overview of the Caribbean legal framework on environmental access rights ......................................................................................9 A. International and regional obligations on environmental access rights ...............................................................................................11 1. International agreements................................................................................................................................................................11 2. The Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean ...............................................................................................................................................14 3. Subregional obligations on environmental access rights ..............................................................................................................16 B. National obligations regarding environmental access rights ...............................................................................................................18 1. Constitutional basis ........................................................................................................................................................................18 2. Statutory basis ................................................................................................................................................................................18 Chapter II Core elements for ensuring environmental access rights .......................................................................................................................25 A. Access to environmental information ....................................................................................................................................................27 1. Scope of the right............................................................................................................................................................................27 2. Definition of environmental information ........................................................................................................................................28 3. Environmental registers ..................................................................................................................................................................29 4. Information to participate in environmental decision-making processes ......................................................................................30 B. Public participation in environmental matters ......................................................................................................................................32 1. Scope of the right............................................................................................................................................................................32 2. Obligation to undertake public participation in the absence of statutory provisions ....................................................................34 3. Proper consultation .........................................................................................................................................................................37 4. The role of public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment ..........................................................................................37 5. Participation at an early stage and reasonable timeframes ..........................................................................................................39 6. Requirements for notification of the public ....................................................................................................................................40 7. Consideration of observations made by the public ........................................................................................................................41 8. Specific measures for the directly affected public and specific groups ........................................................................................42 C. Access to justice in environmental matters ..........................................................................................................................................43 1. Legal standing .................................................................................................................................................................................43 2. Costs................................................................................................................................................................................................44 3. Delay in bringing applications for judicial review ..........................................................................................................................47 4. Alternatives to Dispute Resolution .................................................................................................................................................48 Chapter III Selected Caribbean case law on access rights in environmental matters ..........................................................................................51 Chapter IV Final considerations .......................................................................................................................................................................................87 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................................................................................................91 Annexes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................93 Tables Table 1 Ratification of multilateral environmental agreements in the Caribbean ............................................................................13 Table 2 General environmental laws in the Caribbean ......................................................................................................................19 Table 3 Physical planning laws in the Caribbean ...............................................................................................................................22 Table 4 Freedom of information laws in the Caribbean .....................................................................................................................23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bahamas National Trust [Ch.391 – 1
    THE BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST [CH.391 – 1 THE BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST CHAPTER 391 THE BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Incorporation of Bahamas National Trust. 4. General purposes of Bahamas National Trust. 5. Bahamas National Trust not to divide profits among its members. 6. Constitution of Bahamas National Trust. 7. Subscriptions. 8. As to liability of members. 9. General meetings. 10. Establishment of Council. 11. Supply of casual vacancies in council. 12. Powers and proceedings of council. 13. Secretary and registered office. 14. Certain property of Trust to be inalienable. 15. Power to raise money. 16. Power to obtain professional services. 17. Appointment of receiver. 18. Accounts. 19. Audit. 20. Application of revenue. 21. Capital. 22. Power to charge for admission to Trust property. 23. Arrangements with local authorities and others. 24. Bylaws. 25. Constabulary. 26. The seal. 27. Bylaws to be exhibited. 28. Saving of rights. 29. Copy of Act to be registered. 30. Costs of Act. FIRST SCHEDULE — Regulations Governing General Meetings. SECOND SCHEDULE — Authorised Investments. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– [Original Service 2001] STATUTE LAW OF THE BAHAMAS THE BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST [CH.391 – 3 CHAPTER 391 THE BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST An Act to incorporate and confer powers upon The 21 of 1959 49 of 1961 Bahamas National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or E.L.A.O., 1974 Natural Beauty. 5 of 1987 [Commencement 13th July, 1959] 1. This Act may be cited as the Bahamas National Short title. Trust Act. 2. In this Act, unless the subject or context otherwise Interpretation. requires — “the Bahamas National Trust” means the Bahamas National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty incorporated by this Act; “the Trust property” means the property held by the Bahamas National Trust for purposes of pre- servation; “the council” means the council of the Bahamas National Trust appointed by this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Ministers (As of 27 July 2020)
    Environment Ministers (as of 27 July 2020) Note: This list has been updated to the best of the Secretariat’s knowledge. However please do check the links of the relevant Ministries for latest information. Albania H.E. Mr. Blendi KLOSI Durresi Street No. 27, Tirana Minister Albania Ministry of Tourism and the Environment of the Republic of Albania Phone: +355 4 222 4537 Email: [email protected] Website: http://turizmi.gov.al/ministri/ Andorra H.E. Ms. Sílvia CALVÓ ARMENGOL Carrer Prat de la Creu, 62-64 AD500. Andorra la Vella Minister Andorra Ministry of the Environment, Agriculture and Sustainability of the Principality of Andorra Phone: Tel.: +376 875 700 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.govern.ad/el-govern Armenia H.E. Ms. Irina GHAPLANYAN Governmental building 3, Republic Square 0010 Yerevan Deputy Minister Armenia Ministry of the Environment of the Republic of Armenia Phone: +374 11 818 501; + 375 17 200-68-44 (secretariat); +374 11) 818-518 Email: [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.env.am/en/pages/157 Austria Ms. Leonore GEWESSLER Radetzkystrasse 2, Postfach 3000 1030 Wien Federal Minister Austria Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology of Austria Phone: +43 1 71162 658005 Fax: +43 1 71162 658025 Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.bmk.gv.at/en/ministry/minister/cabinet.html Azerbaijan H.E. Mr. Mukhtar Bahadur BABAYEV B.Ağayev küç.100(A) 1073 Baku Minister Azerbaijan Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources Phone: +994 12 492 59 07 Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected]; Website: http://eco.gov.az/en/4-ministry Belarus H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Vegetation Data from the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e71266 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e71266 Data Paper Current vegetation data from the Prioksko- Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve Mikhail Shovkun‡, Natalya Ivanova§§, Larisa Khanina , Michael S. Romanov§‡, Vasily Demidov ‡ Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve, Danki, Russia § Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology RAS – branch of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia Corresponding author: Mikhail Shovkun ([email protected]), Natalya Ivanova ([email protected]), Larisa Khanina ([email protected]), Vasily Demidov ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ivan Chadin Received: 08 Jul 2021 | Accepted: 17 Aug 2021 | Published: 25 Aug 2021 Citation: Shovkun M, Ivanova N, Khanina L, Romanov MS, Demidov V (2021) Current vegetation data from the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e71266. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e71266 Abstract Background Here we present the sampling event dataset that contributes to the knowledge of current vegetation of the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve (part of the UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves), Moscow Region, Russia. The Reserve is situated on the terraces of the Oka River in the zone of mixed coniferous forests. New information The dataset provides 269 relevés (9174 associated occurrences) of renewed vegetation collected in 2019-2020. It is aimed at sampling vegetation data from the Reserve area with particular interest to sites with invasive species and sites with recent deadfall in the spruce stands caused by the bark beetle-typographer. The dataset contains representative information on plant communities in localities with assigned GPS coordinates, sampled using the standard relevé method with the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Reserve of Orange County
    NATURE RESERVE OF ORANGE COUNTY NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release June 13, 2016 Irvine, California-- Between June 18 to June 24 and July 5 to July 12, the Nature Communities Coalition (NCC), in collaboration with OC Parks, Irvine Ranch Conservancy, and The Nature Conservancy will conduct an aerial weed survey during daylight hours using a small, low-flying helicopter to document and map the distribution of over 30 weed species located within selected inland parks and open space areas. The resulting information will provide details about the abundance and distribution of invasive weeds and help land managers evaluate the effectiveness of current weed monitoring practices, identify emerging weed problems, and strategically plan future weed management actions. Notices describing the aerial weed survey will be posted at trailheads at participating parks and open space areas during the project period. The aerial weed survey will be focused on mapping the distribution of artichoke thistle and a minimum of 30 other established and emerging invasive weeds which degrade natural habitat values important to wildlife and the park visitor experience. The survey will cover nearly 32,000 acres and involve the following land areas (also see attached map): Aerial Survey Area Ownership Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park OC Parks Siphon Reservoir Irvine Ranch Water District City of Irvine Open Space Preserve North City of Irvine Irvine Ranch Open Space OC Parks Irvine Regional Park OC Parks Peters Canyon Regional Park OC Parks Santiago Oaks Regional Park OC Parks Coal Canyon Ecological Reserve California Department of Fish and Wildlife -OVER- The aerial survey will be conducted by an experienced team, Wildlands Conservation Science LLC, using a small helicopter (Schweizer-333) and a crew of three (an experienced pilot and two biologists conducting the survey).
    [Show full text]
  • Order, 2007 Statutory Instrument 2007
    ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2007 STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2007, No. 45 [ Published in the Official Gazette Vol. XXVII No. 68 dated 4th October, 2007. ] _________ Printed at the Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda, by Eric T. Bennett, Government Printer — By Authority, 2007. 800—10.07 [ Price $2.60 ] The Non-citizens Undeveloped Land 2007, No. 45 (Declaration of Undeveloped Land) Order, 2007. 2007, No. 45 3 The Non-citizens Undeveloped Land (Declaration of Undeveloped Land) Order, 2007. THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2007 ARRANGEMENT Order 1. Short title. 2. Declaration of undeveloped land SCHEDULE The Non-citizens Undeveloped Land 2007, No. 45 (Declaration of Undeveloped Land) Order, 2007. 2007, No. 45 5 The Non-citizens Undeveloped Land (Declaration of Undeveloped Land) Order, 2007. THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2007 2007, No. 45 THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2007 made in exercise of the powers contained in section 4 of the Non-citizens Undeveloped Land Tax Act, Cap. 294 WHEREAS the owner of the parcels of land specified in the Schedule, being Asian Village Antigua Limited, whose registered office is situated at P.O. Box 3186, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Is- lands, is a non-citizen as defined in section 2 of the Non-citizens Undeveloped Land Tax Act, Cap. 294; WHEREAS the owner of the parcels of land specified in the Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve
    Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve www.derrycity.gov.uk/biodiversity Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve is a 20 ha former landfill site, located on the banks of the River Foyle, which provides impressive scenery of the Foyle Bridge, Foyle catchment and the City. It can Bay Road Park supports a wide range of habitats to include woodland, grassland, salt be accessed from the Foyle marsh and mudflats. These habitats support a wide range of species, with significant Bridge or behind Da Vinci’s population of wading and wintering birds, including six of Northern Ireland’s priority Hotel, off the Culmore Road. species: redshank, herring gull, song thrush, mistle thrush, starling and bullfinch. Also, international over-wintering birds feast on the eel grass and insects on the mudflats. The woodlands and wildflower meadows provide a habitat for a range of priority species, including eight species of butterflies, for example, orange tip, tortoiseshell, peacock and painted ladies. Also, the willow trees provide a habitat for the lunar hornet moth, which mimics the behaviour of This riverside green space is managed by a wasp. The range of moths provide a Derry City Council for biodiversity and valuable source of food for the bats recreation, with a pedestrian and cycle that use the site for feeding. Two bat network. species have been recorded utilizing It was launched as Derry City Council’s first the site, Pipistrelle and Daubenton bats. Local Nature Reserve in June 2009, for its biodiversity, access, community involvement During your visit you may catch sight of a and educational value.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Van Long Nature Reserve
    Van Long Nature Reserve Vietnam Van Long – local fishers cast nets in the limestone fringed community wetland By Dao Nguyen May 2008 Executive summary Van Long Nature Reserve is situated in Gia Vien district along the Northeastern border of Ninh Binh Province. Van Long straddles seven communes (local Government administrative units) and is in the heartland of the populated centre of north-eastern Vietnam, 85km south of the capitol, Hanoi. All the 45,000 or so people who live in these seven communes in the buffer zone of Van Long are of the Kinh ethnic Vietnamese majority. Van Long itself covers some 3,000 hectares and comprises two major geographic features. Firstly, Van Long is a large wetland and freshwater system. Secondly, the canals, lakes and streams wend through an island-like landscape of karst limestone mountains that harbour the only viable population of the Delacour Langur - one of the world’s most critically endangered species of primate (with less than 200 individuals remaining, globally). Without the protection afforded Van Long by the local community, and now by the Government and local authorities, it is highly probable that the Delacour langur would be the first primate extinction of the 21st Century. The name Van Long dates back centuries, and the community has evidenced a robust capacity to harness the natural resources of Van Long through decades of intense conflict and change, without diminishing their resource base. The cultural significance of the wetland-karst landscape is a vital part of local folklore and sense of place. With the outside discovery of the population of Delacour’s Langur in 1993, external attention to Van Long began to increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Proposal Title
    STATUS QUO TECHNICAL NOTE ENVIRONMENT South Eastern District Local Area Plan 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 This Technical Note represents part of the Phase Two Deliverable for the South Eastern District Local Area Plan. 1.1 DETAILS OF THE STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 1 Contract No. SCM 66 of 11/12 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS QUO ............................................................................................................... 1 Prepared for: 2.1 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE ......................................................................................................................... 1 Msunduzi Municipality 2.2 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2.1 Topography ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.2 Geology ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.3 Soils, Land Cover and Land Capability ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delegate Biographies
    DELEGATE BIOGRAPHIES AUSTRALIA Keith Pitt MP for Hinkler and Chair of the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Keith Pitt was elected to represent the Hinkler Electorate in the Australian Parliament in 2013. He has been a voting member on Parliamentary Joint Standing Committees for Infrastructure and Communications; and Defence Foreign Affairs and Trade. In 2016, Mr Pitt became the Assistant Minister to the Deputy Prime Minister, taking responsibility for natural resource management, soils, animal welfare and water. In July 2016, he was appointed as Assistant Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment. In 2019, Mr Pitt retained the seat of Hinkler in the Federal Election for his third term in Parliament. A former sugar cane farmer, he was a surf lifesaver, plays touch Aussie-rules football and enjoys fishing. Warren Snowdon MP for Lingiari and Member of Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Warren Snowdon was elected to represent Lingiari in 2001 and was previously the MP for Northern Territory, first elected in 1987. He is currently Shadow Assistant Minister for Northern Australia, External Territories, and Indigenous Australians. His previous ministerial positions include: Minister for Veterans' Affairs, Minister for Defence Science and Personnel, and Minister for Indigenous Health, Rural and Regional Health and Regional Services Delivery. Prior to entering politics, Mr Snowdon was a high school teacher and university researcher at the Australian National University Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies. BELGIUM Jean-Marc Delizée House of Representatives Jean-Marc Delizée was elected to the Belgian House of Representatives in 1993 and has been re-elected seven times, most recently in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    2021 High-level Meeting of the Development Cooperation Forum Development cooperation for the Decade of Action: Reduce risk. Enable recovery. Build resilience. (6-7 May 2021, virtual) Speaker biographies . Opening of the 2021 DCF From old debates to a new Decade of Action: the future of development cooperation H.E. Mr. Munir Akram is currently the President of ECOSOC, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations. Ambassador Akram previously served as Pakistan’s Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York for six years between 2002 and 2008, after serving as Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva for seven years from 1995 to 2002. During his term at the United Nations, Ambassador Munir Akram served twice as President of the Security Council; President of the Economic and Social Council; Chairman of the Group of 77 and China (developing countries), and Facilitator on UN Administrative Reform. Ambassador Akram joined the Foreign Service of Pakistan in 1967, holding various positions in the Foreign Ministry as Additional Foreign Secretary and Director-General dealing with the United Nations. He obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Law and a Master’s degree in Political Science from the University of Karachi. Mr. Liu Zhenmin is the Under Secretary-General for the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Liu was Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs of China. Among his various diplomatic assignments, he served as Ambassador and Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and Other International Organizations in Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Aren't We There Yet?
    Why Aren’t We There Yet? Twenty years of sustainable development David Runnalls, President and CEO, IISD March 2008 © 2008, International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, measurement and assessment, and sustainable natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the private sector. March 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel.: +1 (204) 958-7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.iisd.org 2 I remember a conversation with a journalist a few months ago in which he breathlessly told me that environment was the top-of-mind issue in Canadian polls for the first time ever, supplanting national security, unemployment, health care and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Filed Against Different Companies of The
    April 29, 2003 VIA FACSIMILE and U.S. MAIL Mr. Wesley Scholz Director, Office of Investment Affairs and National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 Dear Mr. Scholz: Friends of the Earth-United States is raising a specific instance against Unocal Corporation, ConocoPhillips, and Amerada Hess Corporation (the “U.S. Companies”) for breaching the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (the “Guidelines”) with respect to the Baku-T’bilisi- Ceyhan oil pipeline1 (the “BTC”). The specific areas of concern we raise here relate to the BTC Consortium, of which the U.S. Companies are a part. It is held that the Consortium: y exerted undue influence on the regulatory framework; y sought or accepted exemptions related to social, labor, tax and environmental laws; y failed to operate in a manner contributing to the wider goals of sustainable development; y failed to adequately consult with project-affected communities on pertinent matters; and y undermined the host governments’ ability to mitigate serious threats to the environment, human health and safety. Applicability of the Guidelines to the U.S. Companies As a signatory to the Guidelines, the U.S. government has committed itself to encouraging multinational companies operating on its territory to observe the Guidelines wherever they operate. The U.S. companies’ operations in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey are therefore subject to the Guidelines by virtue of the fact that each enterprise is incorporated and headquartered in the United States and has its primary securities’ listing on the New York Stock Exchange.
    [Show full text]