Anyphaena (Araneae, Anyphaenidae) Overwintering on Lowest Limbs of White Oak

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anyphaena (Araneae, Anyphaenidae) Overwintering on Lowest Limbs of White Oak 2003. The Journal of Arachnology 31:40±43 ANYPHAENA (ARANEAE, ANYPHAENIDAE) OVERWINTERING ON LOWEST LIMBS OF WHITE OAK David W. Boyd, Jr.: USDA, ARS, Small Fruit Research Station, Poplarville, MS 39470 USA Will K. Reeves: Department of Entomology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA ABSTRACT. Juvenile Anyphaena sp. were collected from overwintering traps placed on the lowest limbs of white oak, Quercus alba, in South Carolina. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine that the number of juvenile Anyphaena sp. found can be predicted by the circumference of the limb, the distance from the trunk and the distance from the ground. This study helps demonstrate that the limbs of trees, although often neglected in overwintering studies, can provide a refuge for arthropods. Keywords: Anyphaena, overwintering, Quercus alba Many spiders enter a dormant stage during sibility. Three sets of traps were placed on winter conditions (Schaefer 1977) and those limbs greater than or equal to3minlength: that overwinter on the trunks of trees are often one trap set was proximate to the trunk, one surveyed by collecting the spiders with card- was in the middle of the limb, and one was board wrapped around tree trunks (Tamaki & on the terminus of the limb. Two sets of traps Halfhill 1968; Tedders 1974; Fye 1985; Mizell were placed on limbs shorter than 3 m in & Schiffhauer 1987; Pekar 1999; Horton et al. length: one trap set was proximate to the trunk 2001). However, the species collected in the and one on the terminus of the limb. We trunk traps are not necessarily the same spe- placed traps around the limb 2.5 cm apart, cies that are collected during warmer months parallel to the limb, and held them in place from the limbs of the same trees (PekaÂr 1999; with gray duct tape. The diameter of the limb Horton et al. 2001) and the limbs are usually determined the number of traps around the neglected when sampling for overwintering limb. Two groups of traps were place around species. Our research was conducted to deter- the limb 3±6 cm apart, one offsetting the other mine if the limbs of white oak trees, Quercus (Fig. 1). alba L., were suitable for arthropods to over- We used 5 limbs on the oak tree in Pickens winter, and, if so, where on the limbs they County, each with 3 sets of traps. On the tree overwintered. at Reedy River Historical Park in Greenville County we used three limbs, each with 2 sets METHODS of traps, and on the tree at Bob Jones Uni- We made traps of gray coroplast (corrugat- versity we used two limbs, each with 3 sets ed plastic, similar to cardboard) by cutting a of traps. We used a total of 27 traps. The num- sheet of coroplast into sections 15 cm long by ber of limbs used was based on the number 3±3.5 cm wide, providing six longitudinal of limbs reachable at each location with a 3 cavities in each trap. We placed traps on three m ladder. For purposes of regression analysis mature white oak trees, Quercus alba L., on the average circumference of the limb at each 30 October 1998. One tree was located in trap (circumference at both ends of the trap Pickens County, South Carolina on the Clem- set divided by 2), the distance of the trap from son University campus. Two trees were locat- trunk, the distance from the trap to the ground, ed in Greenville County, South Carolina, one and the branching of the limb from the trunk on the Bob Jones University campus and the to the trap were measured. The bark surface other at Reedy River Falls Historical Park. was rated on a scale of 1±3, where 1 5 Trees were selected based on ease of acces- smooth and 3 5 rough. 40 BOYD, Jr. & REEVESÐANYPHAENA OVERWINTERING ON WHITE OAK 41 Figure 1.ÐOne set of coroplast strip traps. Traps were removed 24 February 1999 after independent variables and the independent three consecutive days of average daily tem- variables. Therefore, only the raw independent peratures near freezing (61 8C) (average tem- variables were used in the analysis. Stepwise, perature for Greenville County was 0.9 8C for forward, and backward model selection tech- 22±24 Feb. and 20.4 8C for Pickens County). inques all provided the same model. The mod- Traps were placed in plastic bags, taken to the el showed no systematic patterns, no outliers, lab and placed in the freezer. Specimens were and no evidence of lack of ®t. removed from the traps, separated, preserved in 80% ethanol and identi®ed. Voucher spec- RESULTS imens were placed in the Clemson University Spiders were the most numerous arthropods Arthropod Collection. collected. All the arthropods collected are list- Juvenile Anyphaena sp. were the only ar- ed in Table 1. More Anyphaena sp. were col- thropods found in numbers large enough to lected near the trunk than the terminus of the conduct multiple regression analysis. The total limbs (Table 2). number of Anyphaena sp. collected was 340. The multiple regression analysis provide Multiple regression analysis was conducted the following model: Number of Anyphaena using Minitab. The dependent variable was sp. 5216.1 1 20.3 (circumference of limb) 2 the number of Anyphaena, which was stan- 2.74 (distance from the trunk) 1 9.86 (dis- dardized for each trap set by dividing the total tance from the ground). This model, with an number of Anyphaena by the total number of R2 of 70.0%, shows that the number of Any- traps in each set. The independent variables phaena overwintering in traps on the bottom were average circumference of the limb, dis- limbs of Q. alba can be predicted by the cir- tance from the trunk, distance from the cumference of the limb, the distance from the ground, number of branches per limb, and trunk and the distance from the ground. bark surface scale for each trap set. For multiple regression analysis on Any- DISCUSSION phaena no transformation of the dependent Schaefer (1977) studied the overwintering variable was needed. A tolerance test showed habits of spiders and determined four over- multicolinearity between polynomials of the wintering habit types. Anyphaena sp. is part 42 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table 1.ÐArthropods collected from overwintering traps around limbs of white oak. Class Order Family Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Coras sp. juv. Anyphaenidae Anyphaena sp. juv. Araneidae Araneus sp. juv. Philodromidae Philodromus vulgaris (Hentz) Philodromus sp. juv. Salticidae Eris militaris (Hentz) Hentzia mitrata (Hentz) Metacyrba undata (De Geer) Thomisidae Bassaniana versicolor (Keyserling) Diplopoda Polyxenida Polyxenidae Polyxenus fasiculatus (Say) Insecta Blattaria Blattellidae Parcoblatta sp. juv. Diptera Syrphidae Syrphus sp. juv. Hemiptera Miridae Deraeocoris nebulosus (Uhler) Psocoptera Ectopsocidae Ectopsocus meridionalis Ribaga of the majority (45%) of spiders that over- after leaf-fall spiders move down from the winter in the juvenile stage (Schaefer 1977). crown until they ®nd refuge (Duffey 1969; Tree-dwelling spiders in the genus Anyphaena Horton et al. 2001), which might be the case are nocturnal wanderers, typically living in fo- with our spiders. The overwintering traps pro- liage from spring through fall, but little of vided a refuge that otherwise would not have their ecology or behavior is known (Platnick been available. The diameter of the limbs af- 1974). They feed on aphids and other prey not fected the number of spiders and without ex- typically active during the day (Marc & Ca- ception, the larger the diameter of the branch nard 1997; Marc et al. 1999). Anyphaena spp. the rougher the bark, which might also pro- take refuge during the winter but can be active vide refugia. during warmer days (Turnbull 1960), increas- Horton et al. (2001) collected arthropods ing their ability for survival (Gunnarsson from cardboard bands weekly 23 Aug±07 Dec 1985). Other overwintering studies, that in- 1999 in Washington apple and pear orchards. cluded Anyphaena spp., sampled only the They found Anyphaena paci®ca Banks in trunk or the proximal end of the largest higher numbers (224 total) on a weekly basis branch. Bajwa and AliNiazee (2001) found than in overwintering samples (7 total, col- only four Anyphaena in a four year study. lected in Jan 2000). They suggested that the Horton et al. (2001) found only seven Any- spiders overwinter elsewhere. In Oregon, A. phaena in a one year study. We demonstrated paci®ca was found in low numbers (0.35% of that Anyphaena will overwinter on most parts total catch) during the growing season by of the branches with refugia present. beating the branches over a net (Bajwa & Most refuges available to overwintering AliNiazee 2001). In Europe, Marc et al. spiders are eliminated when leaves are shed. (1999) and Marc and Canard (1997) suggested Previous studies have shown or suggested that that A. accentuata (Walckenaer) overwinters on the tree trunk, but they collected very few Table 2.ÐMean number of Anyphaena sp. juv. individuals (1% of total catch). (6 SE) collected from coroplast traps on white oak, Our study provides information that can be Quercus alba limbs (South Carolina, 1999). Limb used in further studies of overwintering ar- position is relative to the trunk. thropods on trees. The branches represent a large portion of the tree and are often neglect- Limb Average # ed as a sampling site during the winter position Anyphaena (n) months. Large numbers of spiders on the Proximate 17.4 6 2.0 (10) limbs could alter decision made in integrated Middle 12.3 6 2.8 (10) pest management for landscapes and orchards Terminus 5.4 6 1.3 (8) such as apple, peach, pear, and pecan.
Recommended publications
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Anyphaenids (Araneae, Anyphaeninae, Anyphaenidae) Spider Fauna from the Chocó Forest of Ecuador, with the Description of Thirteen New Species
    European Journal of Taxonomy 255: 1–50 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.255 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2016 · Dupérré N. & Tapia E. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E8DA4DC-FF4C-436E-94FB-CB89F6416C6E Overview of the Anyphaenids (Araneae, Anyphaeninae, Anyphaenidae) spider fauna from the Chocó forest of Ecuador, with the description of thirteen new species Nadine DUPÉRRÉ 1,* & Elicio TAPIA 2 1 Research Associate, Fundación OTONGA, Calle Rither y Bolivia, Quito, Ecuador, and Research Associate, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A. 2 Researcher, Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Geovanny Farina 566, San Rafael, Ecuador. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F15E1FF2-2DF5-479A-AD10-8076CE96E911 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:E842405B-5E5B-43AB-8BCD-586657AD5CFC Abstract. The spider diversity of the family Anyphaenidae in premontane, low evergreen montane and cloud forest from the Chocó region of Ecuador is examined. A total of 287 adult specimens were collected and 19 morphospecies were identified based on male specimens. Thirteen new species are described and one new genus is proposed. Five new species are described in the genus Katissa Brescovit, 1997: Katissa kurusiki sp. nov., K. puyu sp. nov., K. tamya sp. nov., K. yaya sp. nov. and K. guyasamini sp. nov. The new genus Shuyushka gen. nov. is proposed and includes three species: Shuyushka achachay gen. et sp. nov., S. moscai gen. et sp. nov. and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Predator Complex of Homalodisca Vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a Comparative Study of the Eycacy of an ELISA and PCR Gut Content Assay
    Oecologia (2008) 157:629–640 DOI 10.1007/s00442-008-1095-x COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - METHODS PAPER Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the eYcacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay Valerie Fournier · James Hagler · Kent Daane · Jesse de León · Russell Groves Received: 8 November 2007 / Accepted: 4 June 2008 / Published online: 10 July 2008 © Springer-Verlag 2008 Abstract A growing number of ecologists are using cytochrome oxidase gene (subunit I). The gut content molecular gut content assays to qualitatively measure pre- analyses revealed that GWSS remains were present in dation. The two most popular gut content assays are immuno- 15.5% of the predators examined, with 18% of the spiders assays employing pest-speciWc monoclonal antibodies and 11% of the insect predators testing positive. Common (mAb) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays spider predators included members of the Salticidae, employing pest-speciWc DNA. Here, we present results Clubionidae, Anyphaenidae, Miturgidae, and Corinnidae from the Wrst study to simultaneously use both methods to families. Common insect predators included lacewings identify predators of the glassy winged sharpshooter (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), praying mantis (Mantodea: (GWSS), Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar) (Hemiptera: Mantidae), ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), assassin bugs Cicadellidae). A total of 1,229 arthropod predators, repre- (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), and damsel bugs (Hemiptera: senting 30 taxa, were collected from urban landscapes in Nabidae). Comparison of the two assays indicated that they central California and assayed Wrst by means of enzyme- were not equally eVective at detecting GWSS remains in linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a GWSS egg- predator guts.
    [Show full text]
  • Arboreal Arthropod Predation on Early Instar Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth Redacted for Privacy
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Becky L. Fichter for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomologypresented onApril 23, 1984. Title: Arboreal Arthropod Predation on Early Instar Douglas-fir Tussock Moth Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: William P. StOphen Loss of early instar Douglas-fir tussock moth( Orgyia pseudotsugata McDunnough) (DFTM) has been found to constitute 66-92% of intra-generation mortality and to be a key factor in inter-generation population change. This death has been attributed to dispersal and to arthropod predation, two factors previously judged more important to an endemic than an outbreak population. Polyphagous arthropod predators are abundant in the forest canopy but their predaceous habits are difficult to document or quantify. The purpose of the study was to develop and test a serological assay, ELISA or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, for use as an indirect test of predation. Development of this assay involved production of an antiserum reactive with DFTM but not reactive with material from any coexisting lepidopteran larvae. Two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis was used to select a minimally cross-reactive fraction of DFTM hemolymph as the antigen source so that a positive response from a field-collected predator would correlate unambiguously with predation on DFTM. Feeding trials using Podisus maculiventris Say (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) and representative arboreal spiders established the rate of degredation of DFTM antigens ingested by these predators. An arbitrary threshold for deciding which specimens would be considered positive was established as the 95% confidence interval above the mean of controls. Half of the Podisus retained 0 reactivity for 3 days at a constant 24 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae
    Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae Dr. Heather Proctor University of Alberta for the Edmonton Nature Club, 7 Feb 2019 (selected slides for posting; photos (c) H. Proctor unless otherwise noted) Canadian and Albertan diversity • 1477 species of spiders in 45 families known from Canada – may be up to 1800 spp. • 657 species in 28 families known from Alberta 631 of the 657 species are included here from https://www.albertaparks.ca/media/6255191/list-of-elements-ab-invertebrates-spiders.xlsx The 28 families of spiders known from Alberta • no mygalomorph spiders in AB, only araneomorph • Division Synspermiata – Pholcioidea: Pholcidae, Telemidae • Division Entelegynae – Araneoidea: Theridiidae, Araneidae, Linyphiidae, Mysmenidae, Mimetidae, Tetragnathidae – Uloboroidea: Uloboridae – Titanoecoidea: Titanoecidae – Amaurobioidea: Amaurobiidae – Desoidea: Desidae – Agelenoidea: Dictynidae, Cybaeidae, Hahniidae, Agelenidae – Lycosoidea: Oxyopidae, Thomisidae, Pisauridae, Lycosidae – Salticoidea: Salticidae, Philodromidae, Corinnidae, Eutichuridae – Anyphaenoidea: Anyphaenidae, Clubionidae – Liocranoidea: Liocranidae – Trochanteroidea: Phrurolithidae, Gnaphosidae mygalomorphs from BC, Antrodiaetus sp. Linyphiidae 261 Gnaphosidae 51 Lycosidae 50 Salticidae 45 Number of species known Dictynidae 36 from each family in Alberta Thomisidae 37 Theridiidae 36 (based on Robb Bennett’s Araneidae 32 personal list, 7 Feb 2019) Philodromidae 29 Clubionidae 17 Tetragnathidae 14 Hahniidae 10 Amaurobiidae 7 Agelenidae 6 Corinnidae 3 Phrurolithidae
    [Show full text]
  • Eye Patterns of Some Australian Araneomorphs
    EYE PATTERNS OF SOME AUSTRALIAN ARANEOMORPHS Teeatta driesseni Robert Whyte [email protected] Tegenaria Dardurus spinipes Daviesa lubinae Rastellus africanus* Tanganoides greeni ‘Chasmocephalon’ sp. AGELENIDAE AMAUROBIIDAE AMAUROBIIDAE AMMOXENIDAE AMPHINECTIDAE ANAPIDAE Dolophones Neoscona theisi Risdonius parvus Victanapis Amaurobioides litoralis Anepsion ‘Araneus’ Arkys cornutus Carepalxis ANAPIDAE ANAPIDAE ANYPHAENIDAE ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE Celaenia Cyclosa Ordgarius Heurodes turrita Paraplectanoides Phononognatha graeffei Austrarchaea ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE ARANEIDAE ARCHEIDAE * not AU Nyssus Orthobula Clubiona pseudopteroneta CLUBIONIDAE Cithaeron praedonius Calamoneta Cheiracanthium Matidia Disnyssus Copa kabana CITHAERONIDAE EUTICHURIDAE EUTICHURIDAE EUTICHURIDAE CORINNIDAE CORINNIDAE PAGE 1 EYE PATTERNS OF SOME AUSTRALIAN Desis kenyonae ARANEOMORPHS Cycloctenus Avella Badumna sp. Teemenaarus Robert Whyte [email protected] Amauropelma Alaranea* Cycloctenid Deinopis subrufa Badumna longinqua Phryganoporus candidus CTENIDAE CYATHOLIPIDAE CYCLOCTENIDAE DEINOPIDAE DESIDAE DESIDAE Wandella waldockae Dictynid Toxops Toxopsoides Dictynid Dictyna bifasciata Dysdera crocata Wandella alinjarra DESIDAE DESIDAE DICTYNIDAE DICTYNIDAE DYSDERIDAE FILISTATIDAE Progradungula Encoptarthria carraiensis Tamopsis Oreo renmarki Eilica Gnaphosa Gradungula sorenseni* Tamopsis brisbanensis Holarchaea globosa GALLIENIELLIDAE GNAPHOSIDAE GNAPHOSIDAE GRADUNGULIDAE HERSILIIDAE HOLARCHAEIDAE Australolyniphia
    [Show full text]
  • SRS News No. 89
    www.britishspiders.org.uk S.R.S. News. No. 89. In Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 140 Spider Recording Scheme News Autumn 2017, No. 89 Editor: Peter Harvey; [email protected] SRS website: http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk My thanks to those who have contributed to this issue. S.R.S. News No. 90 will be published in Spring 2018. Please send contributions by the end of February at the latest to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, GRAYS, Essex, RM16 2YP; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]. The newsletter depends on your contributions! Editorial Jenifer Newton, a wonderful naturalist with an infectious enthusiasm. It was a great blow to spider recording in the As always, thank you to the contributors who have North West when she passed away. I have also been provided articles for this issue. Please help future issues encouraged and helped by Chris Felton at Liverpool by providing articles, short or longer, on interesting Museum. discoveries and observations. Between 2009 and 2013 I worked at the Local We now have 1,039,621 spider records in total in Environmental Record Centre for North Merseyside, Merseyside BioBank, managing it from 2010. For the last MapMate. About 424,400 have at least some site-based five years I have managed a project called "Tomorrow's phase 2 habitat information. A backlog of Excel data in Biodiversity" for the FSC in Shropshire. As part of that very user-unfriendly format remains to be dealt with. project I have worked with Nigel Cane-Honeysett (area As you will see from articles in this SRS News, we organiser for Shropshire) to develop and deliver a suite of have recently had a number of exciting and unexpected spider and harvestman ID courses ranging from discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Spiders of the Chicago Region 1 the Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation
    An Introduction to the Spiders of Chicago Wilderness, USA Common Spiders of the Chicago Region 1 The Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation Produced by: Jane and John Balaban, North Branch Restoration Project; Rebecca Schillo, Conservation Ecologist, The Field Museum; Lynette Schimming, BugGuide.net. © ECCo, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605 USA [http://fieldmuseum.org/IDtools] [[email protected]] version 2, 2/2012 Images © Tom Murray, Lynette Schimming, Jane and John Balaban, and others – Under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License (non-native species listed in red) ARANEIDAE ORB WEAVERS Orb Weavers and Long-Jawed Orb Weavers make classic orb webs made famous by the book Charlotte’s Web. You can sometimes tell a spider by its eyes, most have eight. This chart shows the orb weaver eye arrangement (see pg 6 for more info) 1 ARANEIDAE 2 Argiope aurantia 3 Argiope trifasciata 4 Araneus marmoreus Orb Weaver Spider Web Black and Yellow Argiope Banded Argiope Marbled Orbweaver ORB WEAVERS are classic spiders of gardens, grasslands, and woodlands. The Argiope shown here are the large grassland spiders of late summer and fall. Most Orb Weavers mature in late summer and look slightly different as juveniles. Pattern and coloring can vary in some species such as Araneus marmoreus. See the link for photos of its color patterns: 5 Araneus thaddeus 6 Araneus cingulatus 7 Araneus diadematus 8 Araneus trifolium http://bugguide.net/node/view/2016 Lattice Orbweaver Cross Orbweaver Shamrock Orbweaver 9 Metepeira labyrinthea 10 Neoscona arabesca 11 Larinioides cornutus 12 Araniella displicata 13 Verrucosa arenata Labyrinth Orbweaver Arabesque Orbweaver Furrow Orbweaver Sixspotted Orbweaver Arrowhead Spider TETRAGNATHIDAE LONG-JAWED ORB WEAVERS Leucauge is a common colorful spider of our gardens and woodlands, often found hanging under its almost horizontal web.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (Inglês)
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0198 ISSN 1678-992X Research Article Soil spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in native and reforested Araucaria forests Ecology Jamil de Morais Pereira1* , Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira Cardoso2 , Antonio Domingos Brescovit3 , Luís Carlos Iuñes de Oliveira Filho4 , Julia Corá Segat5 , Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche Baretta6 , Dilmar Baretta5 1Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul ABSTRACT: Spiders are part of the soil biodiversity, considered fundamental to the food de Minas Gerais, Praça Tiradentes, 416 – 37576-000 – chain hierarchy, directly and indirectly influencing several services in agricultural and forest Inconfidentes, MG – Brasil. ecosystems. The present study aimed to evaluate the biodiversity of soil spider families and 2Universidade de São Paulo/ESALQ – Depto. de Ciência do identify which soil properties influence their presence, as well as proposing families as potential Solo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11 – 13418-900 – Piracicaba, SP – bioindicators. Native forest (NF) and reforested sites (RF) with Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) Brasil. Kuntze were evaluated in three regions of the state São Paulo, both in the winter and summer. 3Instituto Butantan – Lab. Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Fifteen soil samples were collected from each forest to evaluate the biological (spiders and Av. Vital Brasil, 1500 – 05503-900 – São Paulo, SP – Brasil. microbiological), chemical and physical soil properties, in addition to properties of the litter 4Universidade Federal de Pelotas/FAEM – Depto. de Solos, (dry matter and C, N and S contents). For soil spiders, two sampling methods were used: pitfall Av. Eliseu Maciel, s/n – 96050-500 – Capão do Leão, RS – traps and soil monoliths.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Spiders
    18 FROM: Ubick, D., P. Paquin, P.E. Cushing, andV. Roth (eds). 2005. Spiders of North America: an identification manual. American Arachnological Society. 377 pages. Chapter 2 PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SPIDERS Jonathan A. Coddington ARACHNIDA eyes, jumping spiders also share many other anatomical, Spiders are one of the eleven orders of the class Arach- behavioral, ecological, and physiological features. Most nida, which also includes groups such as harvestmen (Opil- important for the field arachnologist they all jump, a useful iones), ticks and mites (Acari), scorpions (Scorpiones), false bit of knowledge if you are trying to catch one. Taxonomic scorpions (Pseudoscorpiones), windscorpions (Solifugae), prediction works in reverse as well: that spider bouncing and vinegaroons (Uropygi). All arachnid orders occur in about erratically in the bushes is almost surely a salticid. North America. Arachnida today comprises approximately Another reason that scientists choose to base classifica- 640 families, 9000 genera, and 93,000 described species, but tion on phylogeny is that evolutionary history (like all his- the current estimate is that untold hundreds of thousands tory) is unique: strictly speaking, it only happened once. of new mites, substantially fewer spiders, and several thou- That means there is only one true reconstruction of evolu- sand species in the remaining orders, are still undescribed tionary history and one true phylogeny: the existing clas- (Adis & Harvey 2000, reviewed in Coddington & Colwell sification is either correct, or it is not. In practice it can be 2001, Coddington et ol. 2004). Acari (ticks and mites) are complicated to reconstruct the true phylogeny of spiders by far the most diverse, Araneae (spiders) second, and the and to know whether any given reconstruction (or classifi- remaining taxa orders of magnitude less diverse.
    [Show full text]