DOCSLIB.ORG

UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation Revision 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation Revision 2 Final Report for the FAA UAS Center of Excellence Task A4: UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation Revision 2 Mr. David Arterburn, Principal Investigator – [email protected] Director, Rotorcraft Systems Engineering and Simulation Center The University of Alabama in Huntsville Dr. Mark Ewing – [email protected] Associate Professor and Director of the Flight Research Laboratory The University of Kansas Dr. Raj Prabhu – [email protected] Professor, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Mississippi State University Dr. Feng Zhu – [email protected] Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. David Francis – [email protected] Post-Doctoral Researcher, Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems Mississippi State University SECURITY STATEMENT: There is no classified or proprietary information in this report. DISTRIBUTION A: Distribution is unlimited 1 Legal Disclaimer The information provided herein may include content supplied by third parties. Although the data and information contained herein has been produced or processed from sources believed to be reliable, the Federal Aviation Administration makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, legality, reliability or usefulness of any information, conclusions or recommendations provided herein. Distribution of the information contained herein does not constitute an endorsement or warranty of the data or information provided herein by the Federal Aviation Administration or the U.S. Department of Transportation. Neither the Federal Aviation Administration or the U.S. Department of Transportation shall be held liable for any improper or incorrect use of the information contained herein and assumes no responsibility for anyone’s use of the information. The Federal Aviation Administration and U.S. Department of Transportation shall not be liable for any claim for any loss, harm, or other damages arising from access to or use of data or information, including without limitation any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, special or consequential damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Federal Aviation Administration shall not be liable to anyone for any decision made or action taken, or not taken, in reliance on the information contained herein. 2 Revision History Revision Description of Change Release Date - Initial Release as required by Contract 27 Oct 2016 - Changed footnotes to first citing only unless second reference is included in Figures or Tables throughout document - page 12 – changed eighteen knowledge gaps to twenty three knowledge gaps in the overview. - page 15 changed "but where pre-approved." to "but were pre- approved." In the first paragraph of section 1.2.2 - page 20 changed “to combined” to “to be combined” at the end of the second paragraph of 2.4.6 - page 22 changed “it important” to “It is important” on the second paragraph of section 2.5.1 - page 23 Table 5 change “should” to “Shoulder” in the first row of the Upper Limbs section - page 27 reference 41 was changed from http://www.faa.gov/uas/publications/media/Micro-UAS-ARC-FINAL- Report.pdf to 1 8 Mar 2017 https://www.faa.gov/uas/resources/uas_regulations_policy/media/Micro- UAS-ARC-FINAL-Report.pdf due to the FAA changing the location of the document. - page 28, section 2.7 changed rate of "3.57x10-3 fatalities per flight hour" to rate of "3.57x10-8 fatalities per flight hour" - page 46,47 Figure 6,7 and 8 updated with complete legends - page 84, section 4.9 changed "most baseball fatalities (25 (58 percent) were" to “He was able to confirm 104 deaths with baseball accounting for 43 (41 percent) of them. .…. Of the 43 total baseball fatalities, 25 (58 percent) were due to blows to the head.” - page 85, Section 4.9.1 changed “where” to “were” in the paragraph below Table 32 - page 86, section 4.10.1 deleted rotational energy equation and moment of inertia equation since these equation were already introduced in Equation 5 and 6. Updated all follow-on numbering for equations including those in the text. - page 87, paragraph below Figure 24 “k3” was changed to k3 Added a new Figure and Table based upon comments from the FAA following Peer Review and Public Release preparation. Figures 23 and Table 29 were added to show the results of steel and wood impact studies 2 28 Apr 2017 that were conducted after completion of the A4 Task. Edits to the paragraphs were made to discuss the results shown in Figure 23 and Table 29. Added legal disclaimer per FAA request. 3 Acknowledgements: The following researchers in addition to the respective university Principal Investigators shown on the title page made fundamental contributions to the content of this UAS Characteristics White Paper, the Ground Collision Final Report and the dialogue with the FAA A4 Project Management Office, Micro-Air Advisory Rulemaking Committee, and UAS Science and Research Panel during the first half of this project – Dr. Brian Landrum (UAH), Mr. Christopher Duling (UAH), Mr. Nishanth Goli (UAH), Mr. Drew Darrah (KU), and Mr. Eric Bodlak (KU). The A4 team would like thank the following Program Managers and subject matter experts from the FAA – Mr. William Oehlschlager, Mr. Wes Ryan, Mr. Christopher Swider, Mr. Paul Campbell, Mr. Ben Walsh, Mr. Paul Albuquerque and Mr. Paul Rumberger. The A4 team also recognizes the vital importance of the exchange of ideas with the A3 Air Collision Severity Evaluation team members including Mr. Tom Aldag, Task A3 Principal Investigator, and Dr. Robert Huculak, Wichita State University, and Dr. Doug Cairns, Montana State University, as well as the continued dialogue with the ASSURE Leadership throughout this project. 4 Executive Summary The UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation Final Report documents the UAS platform characteristics related to the severity of UAS ground collision based upon the literature search of over 300 publications from the automotive industry, consumer battery market, toy standards, and other fields. The literature search included existing standards from a variety of industries and applications as well as methods of analysis and criteria currently in use by other civil and federal agencies. Space debris casualty models were evaluated and extended for proposed use with UAS to determine their viability for ground collision severity assessments and metrics. Parametric analysis, summary data and modified methods are presented to provide insight on the most significant UAS characteristics and how such characteristics are related to the ground collision severity problem. Qualitative characteristics as well as quantitative metrics are presented. Data and Analysis developed during the Task A11 research is also included to update data collected in the early phases of Task A4. Where needed, knowledge gaps are identified for topics outside the scope of the current research. The literature search included the evaluation of various criteria developed for human blunt force trauma injuries, penetration injuries and laceration injuries. These injury types represent the most significant threats to the non-participating public and crews operating mUAS and sUAS platforms. The kinetic energy for the worst case terminal velocity or maximum cruise airspeed, energy density, and rotor diameter are the most significant UAS characteristics contributing to blunt force trauma penetration and laceration injuries, respectively. Two impact kinetic energy methodologies are presented to provide a risk and scenario based approach to determining kinetic energy thresholds for safe UAS operations. Parachute mitigations and the application of area weighted kinetic energy methodology for two scenarios are presented to outline thresholds for a broader range of vehicle weights to conduct flight over people than is currently possible with the unmitigated vehicle designs currently available. An initial investigation of energy transfer based on crash testing and dynamic modeling was conducted along with finite element analysis for human head and torso impacts. The crash test results and subsequent analysis strongly suggest that RCC-based thresholds are overly conservative because they do not accurately represent the collision dynamics of elastically-deformable sUAS with larger contact areas in comparison to the metallic debris analysis methods for high speed missiles on the national test ranges. Dynamic modeling is necessary to improve the assessment of UAS failure modes and associated impact energy, to establish appropriate standoff distances, to model impact footprints for severity analysis and to conduct probability assessments as part of an applicant’s submission for waiver or certification. Lithium Polymer batteries dominate the mUAS and sUAS market as the principle energy source for these platforms. While many of the manufacturers state they test their batteries in accordance with Lithium Ion battery testing methods for consumer electronics, the batteries are rarely marked to show compliance with these standards and many of the test methods are not consistent with the forces and energy levels associated with ground collision impact energy. More research is required to address the fire hazard and impact hazard presented by the broad spectrum of batteries and battery chemistries used in mUAS and sUAS platforms. Twenty-three knowledge gaps were identified during the execution of the literature search and are recommended for future research efforts. 5 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Milton's Use of the Epic Simile in Paradise Lost
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1941 Milton's Use of the Epic Simile in Paradise Lost Francis Louis Martinsek Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Martinsek, Francis Louis, "Milton's Use of the Epic Simile in Paradise Lost" (1941). Master's Theses. 289. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/289 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1941 Francis Louis Martinsek J3 MILTON'S USE OF THE EPIC SIMILE IN PARADISE -LOST by Francis Louis Martinsek, S.J. JUNE 1941 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILL~ffiNT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF W~STER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY VITA AUCTORIS Francis L. ~~rtinsek, S.J., was born at Export, Pennsylvania, on November 12, 1912. He received his elementary training at Export Public Schools, and his high-school training at Export Junior High School and Trafford City High School. He entered Xavier University, Cincinnati, in 1932 and transferred to West Baden College of Loyola University in 1935, where he received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1936. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE Purpose of Thesis; Method~ Procedure •••••••••••1 CHAPTER I The Familz ~~~Epic Simile •••••••••••••••~ CHAPTER II The Function£!~ Simile••••••••••••••••••••••!! CHAPTER III ~Epic Simile in Paradise Lost ••••••••••••••••~ CHAPTER IV The Epic Simile~ Milton's Style ••••••••••••••~ COl\fCLUSION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •~ BIBLIOGRAPIIT • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••§1_ L.D.S.
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION of a COLLISION AVOIDANCE and MITIGATION SYSTEM (CAMS) on WINTER MAINTENANCE TRUCKS Research Administration Reference Number: OR17-103
    EVALUATION OF A COLLISION AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION SYSTEM (CAMS) ON WINTER MAINTENANCE TRUCKS Research Administration Reference Number: OR17-103 Prepared for Michigan Department of Transportation Division of Research 8885 Ricks Road Lansing, MI 48917 Prepared by Michigan State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 428 South Shaw Lane East Lansing, MI 48824 Institute for Transportation Iowa State University 2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4700 Ames, IA 50010 FreezePoint Consulting 179 University Circle Akron, OH SEPTEMBER 21, 2018 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. MDOT Project Manager OR 17-103 N/A Steven J. Cook, P.E. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EVALUATION OF A COLLISION AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION September 21, 2018 SYSTEM (CAMS) ON WINTER MAINTENANCE TRUCKS 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Ali Zockaie, Ramin Saedi, Timothy Gates, Peter Savolainen, Bill Schneider, N/A Mehrnaz Ghamami, Rajat Verma, Fatemeh Fakhrmoosavi, Mohammad Kavianipour, MohammadHossein (Sam) Shojaei, Harprinderjot Singh, Jacob Warner, and Chao Zhou 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Michigan State University N/A 428 S. Shaw Lane 11. Contract or Grant No. East Lansing, Michigan 48824 2018-0060 11 (a). Authorization No. 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Michigan Department of Transportation Final Report Research Administration 10/01/2017 to 09/30/2018 8885 Ricks Rd. P.O. Box 30049 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Lansing, Michigan 48909 N/A 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Traffic Collision Facts Report Includes a Lot of Vital Information and Statistics Regarding Auto Collisions That Occurred on Our Commonwealth’S Roadways
    2019 REPORT Do you need access to data or advice from a traffic safety expert? If you’d like to ask for help with your project, check out the Kentucky Traffic Data Services. KTSDS.ktc.uky.edu Photos and other images created by the Kentucky Transportation Center or licensed with credits under a standard perpetual license agreement through iStock.com in partnership with Getty Images(US), Inc. Dear Kentuckians: Being transparent is a top priority for my administration, and one way to be transparent is to share available data. The 2019 Kentucky Traffic Collision Facts report includes a lot of vital information and statistics regarding auto collisions that occurred on our commonwealth’s roadways. This report should serve as a reminder to all of us that it is our individual responsibility every time we get behind the wheel to demonstrate the skill and knowledge of safe driving in order to keep ourselves and our fellow Kentuckians safe from harm while operating a vehicle. Unfortunately, I am sad to report our commonwealth lost 732 Kentuckians in 2019 to auto collisions; of which 289 were under the influence of drugs and 135 were under the influence of alcohol. They are people who are truly missed by their family and their friends. These lives lost should reinforce our resolve to do our best every day to protect those around us on the roadways. I want to remind all motorists whether they are new to the road or a seasoned driver to follow these safe practices: • Never text and drive • Don’t operate a vehicle under the influence of any substance • Always buckle up • Observe speed limits By holding ourselves accountable and working together, we will save lives and make our roadways safer for all Kentuckians and visitors to our great commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework of Optimizing Moose-Vehicle Collision Mitigation
    A Framework for Optimizing Moose-Vehicle Collision Mitigation Measures in Teton County WYDOT Sponsor Thomas Hart Wyoming Dept. of Transportation 5300 Bishop Boulevard Cheyenne, WY 82009 Phone: (307) 777-4495 WYDOT Co-Sponsor Bob Hammond, P.E. Wyoming Dept. of Transportation 1040 Evans Road Jackson, WY 83001 Phone: (307) 733-3665 Principal Investigator Corinna Riginos, Ph.D. Conservation Research Center (CRC) of Teton Science Schools (TSS) 700 Coyote Canyon Road Jackson, WY 83001 Phone: (307) 734-3741 Co-Investigators Doug Wachob, Ph.D., Associate Executive Director, TSS Kevin Krasnow, Ph.D., Research and Graduate Faculty, TSS Morgan Graham, GIS Manager, CRC Submitted: September 2013 Table of Contents Background and Rationale ..................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 The Role of Scale in Road Crossing Behavior and WVC Mitigation .................................. 5 Road Crossing Behavior in the Urban, Ex-Urban, and Rural Contexts ................................ 7 Study Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 7 Study Objectives .................................................................................................................... 9 Methods ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Conditions of Your Safety Connect Telematics Service
    Terms and Conditions of Your Toyota Entune Telematics Service Effective as of October 18th, 2017 Welcome to your Telematics Services, provided to you by Toyota, a division of Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (“Toyota”). These Terms and Conditions are a legal agreement between you and Toyota (“us”, “our”, and “we”). These Terms and Conditions are part of the Subscription Service Agreement (collectively, the “Agreement”). You can contact us at any time by calling Toyota at 1-800- 331-4331, by visiting www.toyota.com/support/contact.html and selecting the “Email” button, or by writing to us at Toyota, Toyota Entune Customer Care, P.O. Box 259001, Plano, TX 75025-9001. IN THIS AGREEMENT, WHEN WE USE THE WORDS “SAFETY CONNECT”, “TOYOTA ENTUNE” “TOYOTA ENTUNE REMOTE” OR “SERVICE(S)”, WE MEAN ALL THE SERVICES WE PROVIDE TO YOU UNDER YOUR SERVICE PLAN (“SERVICE PLAN”). UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL TERMS USED IN THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HAVE THE SAME MEANING AS SET FORTH IN THE SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE AGREEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT BEFORE USING ANY SERVICE. It is your sole responsibility to make any of your passengers or drivers of your Vehicle aware of the data collection, use, sharing and retention terms of this Agreement. 1. STARTING YOUR SERVICE You can only get and use these Services by accepting this Agreement. To obtain these Services, your Vehicle must contain a factory installed Telematics System (the “System”). If you do not accept the Agreement, including these Terms and Conditions, please notify us immediately and we will cancel your Services. Failure to cancel your Services within 15 days of enrollment for the Services will be deemed acceptance of the Agreement, even if you have not signed the Subscription Services Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Repair Facility Manual
    REPAIR FACILITY MANUAL Michigan Department of State Bureau of Regulatory Services Lansing, Michigan Secretary of State Bureau of Regulatory Services General Licensing Information Telephone 1-888-SOS-MICH (1-888-767-6424) Fax 517/335-2810 Business Licensing and Regulation Division Telephone 1-888-SOS-MICH (1-888-767-6424) Fax 517/335-2810 www.michigan.gov/sos January 2006 SOS-194 Table of Contents Page 1 Page TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1 IMPORTANT TELEPHONE NUMBERS............................................................3 CHAPTER 1: LICENSING REQUIREMENTS 1-1 Registering a Repair Facility ............................................................................................1 1-1.1 Requirement.......................................................................................................1 1-1.2 Exemptions ........................................................................................................1 1-1.3 Other Licensing Requirements ..........................................................................2 1-1.4 Loss of Registration ...........................................................................................2 1-1.5 Reporting Unlicensed Repair Facilities or Mechanics ......................................3 1-2 Registration Process ..........................................................................................................4 1-2.1 Procedure ...........................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutor: Vader Couple Broke Plea Deals, Lied in Statements
    Winlock Woman Bearcats Prevail is the Keeper of W.F. West Victorious Over Black Hills / Sports 5 the Chickens / Life $1 Early Week Edition Tuesday, Reaching 110,000 Readers in Print and Online — www.chronline.com Sept. 22, 2015 Cowlitz Celebration ARTrails Continues Hundreds Attend the 16th Annual Tribal There’s Still One More Weekend to See More Pow Wow at Toledo High School / Main 4 Than 50 Local Artists in Action / Main 3 Commissioners Prosecutor: Vader Couple Broke Fund Announces Plea Deals, Lied in Statements Reelection State to Seek Increased Sentences for Pair Accused of Killing Boy, 3 Bid; Schulte Will Wait DECISIONS: Commissioners Reflect on County Successes By Dameon Pesanti [email protected] The terms of Lewis Coun- ty Commissioners Edna Fund and Bill Schulte are set to ex- pire at the end of next year, and both say their accom- plishments in office and the county’s recent progress are enough to seek re-election. Fund formally announced her candidacy over the week- end. In a speech to friends and family, she said flood mitiga- tion and jobs will be the top priorities of her next term. please see WAIT, page Main 11 Bargaining Pete Caster / [email protected] Defense attorneys Todd Pascoe, left, who is representing Danny Wing, and John Crowley, who is representing Brenda Wing, converse away from their clients prior to on Centralia the start of separate arraignment hearings in Lewis County Superior Court in December 2014 at the Lewis County Law and Justice Center in Chehalis. The Wings are scheduled to be sentenced Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • When an Object Hits Another Object and Sticks Together, the Collision Would Be Totally Inelastic
    The total momentum in any closed system will remain constant. When two or more objects collide, the collision does not change the total momentum of the two objects. Whatever momentum is lost by one object in the collision is gained by the other. The total momentum of the system is conserved. Newton’s Cradle!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IYDb6K5UF8 Formula ¡ psystem = m1v1 + m2v2 ¡ The total momentum of the system before the collision equals the total momentum of the system after the collision. Thus, psystem = p’system There are three types of collisions: 1. Elastic 2. Completely Inelastic * 3. Inelastic ** * We will deal with this situation ** We will NOT deal with this situation Elastic Collisions § When an object hits another object and bounce off each other, the collision would be Elastic. Formula § m1v1+ m2v2 = m1v1‘ + m2v2‘ § Where v is the velocity before the collision and v‘ is the velocities after the collision. Elastic Collision Examples Examples 1. Pools Balls 2. Car wreck when cars hit and bounce away from each other 3. Baseball and bat collision Elastic Collision Possibilities How will you know which situation occurred? If direction changes, velocity will be negative Totally Inelastic Collisions § When an object hits another object and sticks together, the collision would be totally inelastic. § Since the objects stick together, they have the same final velocity. Formula § m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2)vF § Where v (v1 and v2) is the initial velocity of the objects and vF is the final velocity of the objects stuck together. Totally Inelastic Collisions Examples 1. Box cars coupling together 2.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release First Responder and K9 Partner Receive Gift of Transportation During Arson Awareness Week
    Media Contact Kim Kimbriel – Recycled Rides Cell: 520-548-2000 Michal Brower – State Farm Cell: 863.307.8559 News Release | For Immediate Release First Responder and K9 Partner Receive Gift of Transportation during Arson Awareness Week RALEIGH, NC (May 4, 2016) — With wildfire season approaching, Caliber Collision- in Raleigh teamed up with State Farm® Arson Dog Program to provide critical and reliable transportation for a first responder and his K9 partner as part of 2016 Arson Awareness Week, May 1-7. The vehicle presentation was made today at a ceremony on the Capitol courtyard lawn to New Bern Fire Marshal Danny Hill and K-9 partner Darby. The event was attended by State Fire Marshal and Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin who addressed the importance of arson awareness and local efforts to combat the serious crime that destroys countless property and lives every year. According to the National Interagency Fire Center, of the 10 million acres of wildfires nationwide last year, 86% was caused by people, whether intentional or as a result of human negligence. North Carolina ranked third in the nation in wildfires last year with 3,828 wildland fires that burned 15,220 acres. Their Ford F150 truck was donated by State Farm and repaired and modified by Caliber Collision as part of its Recycled Rides program in which collision industry companies collaborate to provide transportation to individuals and service organizations. Caliber technicians volunteered their personal time as a community service. Accelerant detection canines – known as arson dogs - are trained to sniff out minute traces of accelerants (gasoline, lighter fluid, etc.) that may have been used to start a fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Repair Technology
    Title 7: Education K-12 Part 69: Transportation Distribution and Logistics, Career Pathway Collision Repair Technology Program CIP: 47.0603 Ordering Information Research and Curriculum Unit for Workforce Development Vocational and Technical Education Attention: Reference Room and Media Center Coordinator P.O. Drawer DX Mississippi State, MS 39762 www.rcu.msstate.edu/curriculum/download/ (662) 325-2510 Direct inquiries to Scott Kolle Sam Davis Instructional Design Specialist Program Coordinator P.O. Drawer DX Office of Vocational Education and Workforce Mississippi State, MS 39762 Development (662) 325-2510 Mississippi Department of Education E-mail: [email protected] P.O. Box 771 Jackson, MS 39205 (601) 359-3479 E-mail: [email protected] Published by Office of Vocational and Technical Education Mississippi Department of Education Jackson, MS 39205 Research and Curriculum Unit for Workforce Development Vocational and Technical Education Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39762 Robin Parker, Curriculum Coordinator Jolanda Harris, Educational Technologist Amy Johnson, Multimedia Specialist Johnny Jones, Digital Print Specialist Louis Randle, Binding Specialist Kelly Agee, Editor Kim Harris, Graphic Artist The Research and Curriculum Unit (RCU), located in Starkville, MS, as part of Mississippi State University, was established to foster educational enhancements and innovations. In keeping with the land grant mission of 1 Mississippi State University, the RCU is dedicated to improving the quality of life for Mississippians. The RCU enhances intellectual and professional development of Mississippi students and educators while applying knowledge and educational research to the lives of the people of the state. The RCU works within the contexts of curriculum development and revision, research, assessment, professional development, and industrial training.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Journal: Vol. 58, No. 52
    The Republican V0LUME 58- BELFAST, MAINE, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 30, 1886. Journal NUMBER 52. A Sketch of Puget Bound. FARM. GARDEN AND KKITKLICAN HOUSEHOLD. Prohibition in Eliode Island. or Western district the temperance nominee is European Sketches. including wine." Under these circumstances News and Notes. Work. No Third JOURNAL. an over the was our Literary Temperance Party I’tMM Tmvssi M), \V. T. Nov. |>so. some of confessedly improvement last, it absolutely necessary that amusement ment To nil: of Needed. friends from Maine are For this depart brief suggestions, facts, Klirmii ok the Jokknai.: Your though both are men tried and excel- (iOSSIl*. for the remainder of the day should be of light will have a I I It 'll' l> I \ I 111 Till KSIIU MOliMNO m TilK m> asking me to describe ability 1'AltIS NFAN'S AND The New Year’s Wide Awake and are solicited from readers remember that when the elec- lent It is a singular ’coincidence and nature. So we chose Lubin's Sound and 1 will experience housekeep- may reputation. buoyant ami readable Christmas story by Sarah < >. Puget Imre give a rough sketch and long To Tin: Ki»rroi: 01 tin: .Ioiknal. The ers. farmers gardeners. Address tors of Rhode Island, in last, voted that the initials of each are the lirst three let- NO. 4. salesrooms in the St. Anne as our “The iiuest.” of it, from t Agri- April objective Jewett, entitled Christinas starting ape Flattery proceeding up cultural editor. Journal Office, Belfast, Me. prohibition into their constitution l remarked ters of the The leader of the We were treated most those present temperance movement lias well been Journal Co.
    [Show full text]
  • China-US Aircraft Collision Incident of April 2001
    Order Code RL30946 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China-U.S. Aircraft Collision Incident of April 2001: Assessments and Policy Implications Updated October 10, 2001 Shirley A. Kan (Coordinator), Richard Best, Christopher Bolkcom, Robert Chapman, Richard Cronin, Kerry Dumbaugh, Stuart Goldman, Mark Manyin, Wayne Morrison, Ronald O’Rourke Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division David Ackerman American Law Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress China-U.S. Aircraft Collision Incident of April 2001: Assessments and Policy Implications Summary The serious incident of April 2001 between the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) involved a collision over the South China Sea between a U.S. Navy EP-3 reconnaissance plane and a People’s Liberation Army (PLA) naval F-8 fighter that crashed. After surviving the near-fatal accident, the U.S. crew made an emergency landing of their damaged plane onto the PLA’s Lingshui airfield on Hainan Island, and the PRC detained the 24 crew members for 11 days. Washington and Beijing disagreed over the cause of the accident, the release of the crew and plane, whether Washington would “apologize,” and the PRC’s right to inspect the EP- 3. In the longer term, the incident has implications for the right of U.S. and other nations’ aircraft to fly in international airspace near China. (This CRS Report, first issued on April 20, 2001, includes an update on the later EP-3 recovery.) The incident prompted assessments about PRC leaders, their hardline position, and their claims. While some speculated about PLA dominance, President and Central Military Commission Chairman Jiang Zemin and his diplomats were in the lead, while PLA leaders followed in stance with no more inflammatory rhetoric.
    [Show full text]