DOCSLIB.ORG

Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts 2009 PCCP Workshop & Expo January 27, 2009 Robert Rodden Director of Technical Services Why a Roundabout? According to FHWA: Up to 90% reduction in fatalities 76% reduction in injury crashes 30-40% reduction in pedestrian crashes 75% fewer conflict points than 4-way intersections 30-50% increase in traffic capacity No signal equipment to install/maintain No left-turn lane and reduced need for storage lanes Design of Concrete Roundabouts Thickness Design Joint Design Layout Locations Allow Adjustment in the Field Construction Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts WHY CONCRETE? Why Concrete Roundabouts? Let’s ask a couple questions… 1. Where do we historically use concrete pavement? (situations, traffic conditions, applications, etc.) 2. What performance characteristics of concrete pavement make it the best choice for roundabouts? Where are Concrete Pavements Historically Used? Answers: High traffic areas Areas with lots of turning movements Situations where we need a “long-term fix” Situations where future maintenance must be kept to an absolute minimum Areas where future disruption to traffic must be kept to a minimum Areas where safety is a priority Why Concrete for Roundabouts? Answers: Long service life Minimal maintenance requirements Resistance to surface deformation Doesn’t rut or shove Maintains surface/drainage characteristics No future overlays required (grade issues) Ease of construction (constructability) Roundabouts typically hand placed but some have been constructed with slipform paving machines Why Concrete (cont.) Answers: Superior safety aspects Drainage Skid resistance Lighting More aesthetically pleasing Faster construction Economical over long-term (LCC) Why Concrete Roundabouts? Concrete is the perfect material for roundabout applications. Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts THICKNESS DESIGN Pavement Thickness Design AASHTO 1993 Pavement Design Guide Most commonly used by state DOTs New Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Under calibration/implementation in many states ACPA (PCA) StreetPave software: http://www.pavement.com/streetpave/ MUST CONSIDER CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC!! Concrete Intersections: Thickness Physical Area Functional Area Concrete Intersections: Thickness Physical Area Functional Area Physical Area Roadway 1 Roadway 2 Thickness Low ADTT (T1) Low ADTT (T2) T2 Low ADTT (T1) High ADTT (T3) T3 High ADTT (T3) High ADTT (T3) T3 + 0.5 to 1 in. T3>T2>T1 Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts JOINTING ROUNDABOUTS Jointing Decide on joint layout philosophy Like normal intersection Isolate circle from legs Pave-through, isolate two legs Other philosophy, based on experience Follow 6-step method Joints in circular portion radiate from center Joints in legs are normal (perpendicular) Layout Joints as Normal Good for small roundabouts or traffic circles? Proper Jointing of Roundabouts Concrete Roundabout Jointing Develop a jointing plan Bird’s eye view Remember rules Follow the steps Be practical! Rules for Joint Layout Things to Do Match existing joints or cracks – location AND type! Cut joints at the proper time Place joints to meet in-pavement structures Remember maximum joint spacing Place isolation joints where needed Understand that joint locations can be adjusted in the field! Be Practical Location Type Rules for Joint Layout Things to Avoid: Slabs < 2 ft wide Slabs > 15 ft wide Angles < 60º (90º is best) Dog-leg joints through curve radius points Creating interior corners Odd Shapes (keep slabs near- square or pie-shaped) Recommended Maximum Joint Spacing ML = T x Cs ML = Maximum length between joints (in.) T = Slab thickness (in.) Cs = Support constant Use 24 for subgrades or unstabilized [granular] subbases; Use 21 for stabilized subbases (ATB, CTB, lean concrete) or existing concrete or asphalt pavement; Use 12 to 15 for thin bonded overlays on asphalt Joint Spacing Recommendations For Streets, Roads, and Highways: Use ML = T x Cs Keep ratio of transverse to longitudinal spacing at less than 1.5 Keep maximum spacing of transverse joints to 15 ft for plain concrete unless local history shows longer panels work What About Load Transfer? Aggregate Interlock Maximum aggregate size is important Mechanical connection Dowel bars Tiebars Subbase support Dowel Bar Recommendations Pavement Thickness Dowel Diameter Less than 7.0 in. None 7.0 – 7.9 in. 1 in. 8.0 – 9.9 in. 1-1/4 in. Greater than 10.0 in. 1-1/2 in. Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts 6-STEP METHOD FOR JOINTING ROUNDABOUTS Jointing a Roundabout Step 1: Draw all pavement edges and back-of-curb lines in plan view. Jointing a Roundabout Step 2: Draw all lane lines on the legs and in the circular portion, accounting for roundabout type. Jointing a Roundabout Step 3: Add “transverse” joints in the circle, being mindful of the maximum joint spacing. Jointing a Roundabout Step 4: On the legs, add transverse joints where width changes occur. Jointing a Roundabout Step 5: Add transverse joints between those added in Step 4, minding the maximum joint spacing. Doglegs Layout Joints as Normal Good for small roundabouts or traffic circles? Jointing a Roundabout Step 5: Add transverse joints between those added in Step 4, minding the maximum joint spacing. Jointing a Roundabout Step 6: Make adjustments for in-pavement objects, fixtures, and to eliminate odd shaped slabs. …And Box Out Fixtures Properly! If You DO Box Out Properly… If You DON’T Box Out Properly… Good Practice… What If I Have to Dead-end a Joint? What If I Have to Dead-end a Joint? What If I Have to Dead-end a Joint? Design and Jointing of Concrete Roundabouts EXAMPLE IN KANSAS 110th Street & Lamar Avenue Overland Park, Kansas 110th Street & Lamar Avenue Overland Park, Kansas 110th Street & Lamar Avenue Overland Park, Kansas Properly Jointed Roundabout Properly Jointed Roundabout Rough Grading Grading of Subgrade Subbase & Curb Const. Curb Placement – Widened Gutter Field Joint Layout Plan Inner Pavement Ring Formed Inner Pavement Ring Formed Dowel Basket Placement Start Concrete Placement Hand Placement with Roller Screed Hand Finishing Half Way Done! Outer Ring… Outer Ring… Outer Ring… Outer Ring… 1 inch Isolation Joint Approach Lanes… Approach Lane Sequence Finishing Approach Lanes Open to Traffic! Another Kansas Example… More Information? “Concrete Pavement Field Reference,” EB237P, ACPA, 2007. “Concrete Roundabouts: Rigid Pavement Well-Suited to Increasingly Popular Intersection Type, “ R&T Update #6.03, ACPA, June 2005. “Roundabouts: An Informational Guide,” FHWA-RD-00-068, FHWA, March 2000. “Kansas Roundabout Guide”: http://www.ksdot.org/burTrafficEng/Roundabouts/Roundabout_Gui de/RoundaboutGuide.asp Various agency standards…KS, WI, IA, OH, etc… Questions? Robert Rodden [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Module 6. Hov Treatments
    Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Module 6. TABLE OF CONTENTS MODULE 6. HOV TREATMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................ 6-5 TREATMENTS ..................................................... 6-6 MODULE OBJECTIVES ............................................. 6-6 MODULE SCOPE ................................................... 6-7 6.2 DESIGN PROCESS .......................................... 6-7 IDENTIFY PROBLEMS/NEEDS ....................................... 6-7 IDENTIFICATION OF PARTNERS .................................... 6-8 CONSENSUS BUILDING ........................................... 6-10 ESTABLISH GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................... 6-10 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE CRITERIA / MOES ....................... 6-10 DEFINE FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS ............................. 6-11 IDENTIFY AND SCREEN TECHNOLOGY ............................. 6-11 System Planning ................................................. 6-13 IMPLEMENTATION ............................................... 6-15 EVALUATION .................................................... 6-16 6.3 TECHNIQUES AND TECHNOLOGIES .................. 6-18 HOV FACILITIES ................................................. 6-18 Operational Considerations ......................................... 6-18 HOV Roadway Operations ...................................... 6-20 Operating Efficiency .......................................... 6-20 Considerations for 2+ Versus 3+ Occupancy Requirement ............. 6-20 Hours of Operations ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Replacement of Davis Avenue Bridge Over Indian Harbor Bridge No
    REPLACEMENT OF DAVIS AVENUE BRIDGE OVER INDIAN HARBOR BRIDGE NO. 05012 November 19, 2019 1 MEETING AGENDA • Project Team • Project Overview • Existing Conditions • Alternatives Considered • Traffic Impacts • Proposed Alternative • Railing Options • Construction Cost / Schedule • Contact Information • Questions 2 PROJECT TEAM Town of Greenwich Owner Alfred Benesch & Company Prime Consultant, Structural, Highway, Hydraulic, Drainage Design GZA GeoEnvironmantal Inc. Environmental Permitting Didona Associates Landscape Architects, LLC Landscaping Services, Planning 3 LOCATION MAP EXIT 4 EXIT 3 BRIDGE LOCATION 4 AERIAL VIEW BRIDGE LOCATION 5 PROJECT TIMELINE CURRENT PROJECT STATUS INVESTIGATION ALTERNATIVES PRELIMINARY FINAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE ASSESSMENT DESIGN DESIGN Spring to Fall 2020 February 2018 to June 2018 to January 2019 to May 2019 to May 2018 January 2019 April 2019 December 2019 6 PROJECT GOALS • Correct Existing Deficiencies of the Bridge (Structural and Functional) • Improve Multimodal Traffic Flow at Bridge Crossing (Vehicles / Bicycles / Pedestrians) • Maintain / Enhance Safety at Bridge Crossing • Meet Local, State, and Federal Requirements 7 EXISTING BRIDGE – BRIDGE PLAN 8 EXISTING BRIDGE – CURRENT PLAN VIEW 9 EXISTING BRIDGE Existing Bridge Data • Construction Year: 1934 • Structure Type: Concrete Slab Supported on Stone Masonry Abutments and Pier • Structure Length: 37’‐3” (17’‐1” Span Lengths) • Bridge Width: 43’+ (Outside to Outside) • Lane Configuration: Two Lanes, Two 4’ Sidewalks • Existing Utilities: Water, Gas (Supported
    [Show full text]
  • CONCRETE Pavingtechnology Concrete Intersections a Guide for Design and Construction
    CONCRETE PAVINGTechnology Concrete Intersections A Guide for Design and Construction Introduction Traffic causes damage to pavement of at-grade street and road intersections perhaps more than any other location. Heavy vehicle stopping and turning can stress the pavement surface severely along the approaches to an intersection. The pavement within the junction (physical area) of an intersection also may receive nearly twice the traffic as the pavement on the approaching roadways. At busy intersections, the added load and stress from heavy vehicles often cause asphalt pavements to deteriorate prematurely. Asphalt surfaces tend to rut and shove under the strain of busses and trucks stopping and turning. These deformed surfaces become a safety concern for drivers and a costly maintenance problem for the roadway agency. Concrete pavements better withstand the loading and turning movements of heavy vehicles. As a result, city, county and state roadway agencies have begun rebuilding deteriorated asphalt intersections with con- crete pavement. These agencies are extending road and street system maintenance funds by eliminating the expense of intersections that require frequent maintenance. At-grade intersections along business, industrial and arterial corridor routes are some of the busiest and most vital pavements in an urban road network. Closing these roads and intersections for pavement repair creates costly traffic delays and disruption to local businesses. Concrete pavements provide a long service life for these major corridors and intersections. Concrete pavements also offer other advantages for As a rule, it is important to evaluate the existing pave- intersections: ment condition before choosing limits for the new concrete pavement. On busy routes, it may be desir- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Concrete Sidewalk Specifications
    CONCRETE SIDEWALK SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with these specifications and the requirements of the State of Wisconsin, Department of Transportation, Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Current Edition (hereafter “Standard Specifications”). Concrete sidewalks shall conform to the lines and grades established by the City Engineer. All removal and replacements will be made as ordered by the City Engineer. The Contractor shall construct one-course sidewalks of a minimum thickness of four (4) inches in accordance with the plans and specifications. Sidewalk through a driveway section shall be a minimum thickness of six (6) inches. Concrete driveway approaches shall be a minimum thickness of six (6) inches. SUBGRADE A new sub-base may be required by the Engineer if, in his opinion, the soil in the subgrade is soft or spongy in places and will swell or shrink with changes in its moisture content. If a new sub- base is required, it shall consist of granular material and shall be spread to a depth of at least three (3) inches and thoroughly compacted. While compacting the sub-base the material shall be thoroughly wet and shall be wet when the concrete is deposited but shall not show any pools of water. If the Contractor undercuts the subgrade two (2) inches or more, he shall, at his expense, bring the subgrade to grade by using gravel fill and it shall be thoroughly compacted. Where sidewalk is placed over excavations such as tree roots or sewer laterals, four (4) one-half (1/2) inch reinforcing bars shall be placed to prevent settling or cracking of the sidewalk.
    [Show full text]
  • Concrete Pavementspavements N a a T T I I O O N N a a L L
    N N a a t t i i o o n n a a Technical Services l l , R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o Vail, Colorado u u t t May 22-25, 2005 Steve Waalkes, P.E. C C o o n n f f e e r r e e Managing Director n n c American Concrete Pavement Association c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 TRB National Roundabouts Conference D D Concrete Roundabouts R R Concrete Roundabouts A A F F T T N N a a Flexible Uses liquid asphalt as binder Pro: usually lower cost Con: requires frequent maintenance & rehabilitation t t i i Asphalt o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C Terminology Terminology o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 D D R R A A Rigid Uses cement as binder Pro: longer lasting Con: higher cost Concrete F F T T N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C o o s n n c f f e i e r r t e e n n e y c c t e h e t 2 2 e 0 0 f s 0 0 aterials onstructability a e conomics 5 erformance (future maintenance) 5 Why Concrete Roundabouts? Why Concrete Roundabouts? D D E C P M R R • • • • •S •A A A F F T T Realize there is a choice N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t C C o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 What performance characteristics of Where do we typically use concrete pavement? (situations, traffic conditions, applications, etc.) concrete pavement make it the best choice for roundabouts? 5 5 Why Concrete Roundabouts? Why Concrete Roundabouts? D D R R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Highway Sufficiency Ratings
    4 Pavement Data 1 Report New York State Department of Transportation 20 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................ i Location / Identification ........................................................... ii Physical Characteristics ......................................................... iii Traffic Information .................................................................. v Condition Information ............................................................. v Other Data .............................................................................. ix Glossary ................................................................................. xi Region/County Abbreviations ................................................. xii New York State Parkways by Jurisdiction .............................. xiii Notes for the New York State Thruway .................................. xiv Pavement Data Report ........................................................... 1 This report was prepared by Pavement Data Services, New York State Department of Transportation. Inquiries or requests for information should be directed to: Pavement Data Services, NYSDOT, 50 Wolf Road POD 42, Albany, New York 12232 (518-457-1965). A pdf file of this report is available for download from the Pavement Management page of the Department’s website at www.nysdot.gov. Hard copies of the report are no longer created. 2014 Pavement Data Report for New York State Highways INTRODUCTION The New York State Department of
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 What Is Concrete Masonry?
    1.1 What is Concrete Masonry? Introduction Concrete masonry construction (or as it is more and Specifiers are using Architectural Masonry in commonly called, concrete blockwork) is based on more commercial and residential applications. thousands of years experience in building structures of stone, mud and clay bricks. Blockwork masonry Using the various textures of Fair Face, Honed and units are hollow and are filled with concrete and Splitface is adding a lot more variety to the features allow for the integration of reinforcing steel, a feature of the wall. essential for earthquake resistant design. Concrete blockwork provides a structural and architectural advantage in one material and is recognised worldwide as a major contributor to the construction and building industry. Types of Concrete Blockwork The workhorse of concrete masonry has traditionally been stretcher bond blockwork forming structural, fire and acoustic functions from residential to large commercial buildings as well as the special use in retaining walls. With the introduction of coloured masonry Architects Figure 1: Commercial Stretcher Bond Blockwork Figure 2: Coloured Honed Blockwork Figure 3: Coloured Honed Blockwork Figure 4: Coloured Fairface, Honed and Splitface Blockwork Figure 5: Splitface Blockwork New Zealand Concrete Masonry Association Inc. Figure 6: Honed Half High Blockwork Figure 7: Honed Natural Blockwork There are also masonry blocks that include polystyrene inserts which provide all the structural benefits of a normal masonry block with the added advantage of built-in insulation. Building with these blocks removes the need for additional insulation - providing the added design flexibility of a solid plastered finish both inside and out. The word “Concrete Masonry” also encompasses a wide variety of products such as, brick veneers, retaining walls, paving and kerbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement Marking Handbook
    Pavement Marking Handbook August 2004 © 2004 Texas Department of Transportation All rights reserved Pavement Marking Handbook August 2004 Manual Notices Manual Notice 2004-1 To: Recipients of Subject Manual From: Carlos A. Lopez, P.E. Traffic Operations Division Manual: Pavement Marking Handbook Effective Date: August 2004 Purpose and Content This handbook provides information on material selection, installation, and inspection guidelines for pavement markings. It is targeted for two audiences — engineering personnel and field personnel. The portion for engineering personnel provides information on selecting pavement marking materials for various applications. The portion for field personnel provides information on pavement marking installation and inspection. Additional information about TxDOT specifications, procedures, and standards applicable to pavement markings are included in an appendix. The manual may be used by designers to help with pavement marking material selection and inspectors in the field. Instructions This is a new manual, and it does not replace any existing documents. Content Cover Table of Contents Chapters 1 through 3 Appendix A & B Review History This manual is the product of a Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) research project. The TxDOT project director is Greg Brinkmeyer of the Traffic Operations Division. The research supervisor is Gene Hawkins of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI). Tim Gates and Liz Rose of TTI developed most of the material in the handbook. Wade Odell was the research liaison engineer for the TxDOT Research and Technology Implementation Office. (continued...) Review History (continued) This handbook became a reality because numerous individuals were willing to contribute their time, ideas, and comments during the development process. Special credit should be given to a group of TxDOT staff who meet on a regular basis to review drafts and develop material for the handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravel Roads Maintenance & Frontrunner Training Workshop
    A Ditch In Time Gravel Roads Maintenance Workshop 1 So you think you’ve got a wicked driveway 2 1600’ driveway with four switchbacks and 175’ of elevation change (11% grade) 3 Rockhouse Development, Conway 4 5 6 Swift River (left) through National Forest into Saco River that drains the MWV Valley’s developments 7 The best material starts as solid rock that is drilled & blasted… 8 Then crushed into smaller pieces and screened to produce specific size aggregate 9 How strong should it be? One big truck = 10,000 cars! 10 11 The road surface… • Lots of small aggregate (stones) to provide strength with a shape that will lock stones together to support wheels • Sufficient “fines,” the binder that will lock the stones together, to keep the stones from moving around 12 • The stone: hard and uniform in size and more angular than that made just from screening bank run gravel 13 • A proper combination of correctly sized broken rock, sand and silt/clay soil materials will produce a road surface that hardens into a strong and stable crust that forms a reasonably impervious “roof” to our road • An improper balance- a surface that is loose, soft & greasy when wet, or excessively dusty when dry (see samples) 14 One way to judge whether gravel will pack or not… 15 Here’s another way… 16 Or: The VeryFine test The sticky palm test As shown in the Camp Roads manual 17 • “Dirty” gravel packs but does not drain • “Clean” gravel drains but does not pack 18 Other road surfacing materials: • Rotten Rock- traditional surfacing material in the Mt Washington Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Evaluation of Rutting Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Ivan Syed University of New Mexico - Main Campus
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Civil Engineering ETDs Engineering ETDs Fall 11-7-2017 Comprehensive Evaluation of Rutting Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Ivan Syed University of New Mexico - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ce_etds Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Syed, Ivan. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Rutting Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ce_etds/187 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Engineering ETDs at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Civil Engineering ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ivan Anwar Syed Candidate Civil Engineering Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: Dr. Rafiqul A. Tarefder, Chairperson Dr. John C. Stormont Dr. Tang-Tat Ng i COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF RUTTING PERFORMANCE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES by IVAN ANWAR SYED B.S., CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, 2014 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Civil Engineering The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2017 ii DEDICATIONS This thesis is dedicated to my family, Lenore Syed, Anwar Aziz, & Allen Syed For their endless love, support, and inspiration iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Rafiqul A. Tarefder, my Advisor and MS thesis Committee Chair, for the inestimable guidance, enthusiasm and support throughout the development of this thesis. This study was jointly funded by the New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) and the Southern Plains Transportation Center (SPTC).
    [Show full text]
  • Poston Brick Company Memoir
    University of Illinois at Springfield Norris L Brookens Library Archives/Special Collections Poston Brick Company Memoir P846. Poston Brick Company Interview and memoir 5 tapes, 240 mins., 78 pp. The narrators discuss personnel, machines, operations and types of bricks manufactured at the Poston Brick Company in Springfield. Narrators also discuss working conditions, hazards, co-workers, and the structures located on the factory grounds. Interviews by Garnetta Cook, 1972 OPEN: see individual names for legal release See individual collateral files : interviewer's notes, photos of factory, photocopies of articles about the factory, list of buildings built with the company's bricks, and background notes. Archives/Special Collections LIB 144 University of Illinois at Springfield One University Plaza, MS BRK 140 Springfield IL 62703-5407 © 1972, University of Illinois Board of Trustees ! ' • Poston Brick Company Ivory Carter (23 pages) Estol Cook (11 pages) Mark Cook (14 pages) William E. Poston ( 4 pages) Earl Robinson (10 pages) Henrietta Van Cleve ( 4 'pages) These interviews are part of a project on the Poston Brick Company in Springfield, Illinois. People interviewed include a former employee's wife, former employees, and the president of Poston Brick. They relate their working experiences with regard to making bricks. The interviewer was Garnetta Cook. COPYRIGHT@ 1985 SANGAMON STATE UNIVERSITY, SPRINGFIELD, ILUNOIS. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Oral History Office, Sangamon State University, Springfield, Illinois 62708.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement Condition Assessment V2.0W
    NYSDOT Network Level Pavement Condition Assessment V2.0w Surface Distress Rating Ride Quality (IRI) Pavement Condition Index IRI Deduct 35 30 IRI >170 in/mi y = 1.08 (9E-06x3 - 0.0075x2 + 2.0532x - 154.37) 25 20 IRI <170 in/mi y = 0.90 (2E-06x3 + 0.0004x2 + 0.0596x - 5.2585) 15 DeductValue 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 IRI (in/mi) New York State Department of Transportation i Network Level Pavement Condition Assessment Preface This document describes the procedures used by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to assess and quantify network-level pavement condition. There are four general facets of pavement condition: surface distress, ride quality, structural capacity and friction. Because the data collection tools currently available to measure structural capacity and friction are not efficient for network-level data collection, the NYSDOT condition assessment procedures are limited to certain surface distresses and to ride quality. Network-level data for these condition factors is readily available through ongoing data collection programs. Information about pavement condition and performance is critical to the decision making that occurs to successfully manage highway pavements. Accurate and timely data is used to assess system performance and deterioration, identify maintenance and reconstruction needs, and determine financing requirements. The annual assessment and reporting of pavement conditions is required by the New York State Highway Law (§ 2 Section 10). NYSDOT has assessed pavement surface distress information annually on 100% of the state highway system using a visual windshield rating system since 1981. The original paper-based collection procedure was replaced in 2004 with the E-Score electronic recording system.
    [Show full text]