Trends and Present Situation of Road Traffic Accidents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trends and Present Situation of Road Traffic Accidents 2. Efforts to Assure Safe and Comfortable Mobility Associate Professor, Graduate School of Trends and Present Situation Environmental Science, Okayama University 2-1 of Road Traffic Accidents Seiji Hashimoto After the latest peak in 1992, the number of traffic fatalities has shown a downward trend; in 2009, it dropped to less than 5000 (4914 lives lost). There has also been a continuous reduction in recent years in the number of traffic accidents and the number of casualties; obviously, various efforts made in the past have started to pay off. A look at the details of traffic accidents By age: accidents involving young people (age 20 to 29) have noticeably decreased, and are now less than those involving people 50 to 59 years old. By means of transportation: for bicycles, which are popular as eco-friendly transportation, the number of fatalities has leveled off; but the bicycle accidents involving pedestrians are increasing; there is a need for traffic safety education that aims at better cycling practices and the managing of space for safe cycling. Fig. 1 Changes in the numbers of fatalities and injuries Table 1 The ten prefectures with the highest casualties: from traffic accidents, and changes in the number number of traffic casualties per 100,000 of accidents ■ The number of fatalities from traffic accidents decreased inhabitants and per 10,000 vehicles in 2009 steadily, as did the number of accidents and the number of Casualties per 100,000 people Casualties per 10,000 vehicles injuries. Kagawa Prefecture 1461.4 Kagawa Prefecture 162.9 㪈㪉㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪇㪇 Saga Prefecture 1230.2 Fukuoka Prefecture 159.9 㪈㪍㪎㪍㪌 Number of fatalities 㪐㪏㪈㪇㪐㪍 㪈㪏㪇㪇㪇 Shizuoka Prefecture 1226.5 Shizuoka Prefecture 145.6 㪈㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪍㪇㪇㪇 s 㪐㪈㪇㪈㪈㪌 Gunma Prefecture 1201.9 Saga Prefecture 141.5 Number of injuries 㪈㪋㪇㪇㪇 㪏㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇 Miyazaki Prefecture 1169.9 Osaka Prefecture 135.6 㪎㪊㪍㪍㪏㪏 㪈㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪎㪉㪇㪏㪏㪇 Fukuoka Prefecture 1140.8 Miyazaki Prefecture 128.0 㪍㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪇㪇 Okayama Prefecture 1123.7 Okayama Prefecture 126.7 㪏㪇㪇㪇 㪋㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇 Yamanashi Prefecture 1000.9 Gunma Prefecture 126.6 㪍㪇㪇㪇 Number of fatalitie Number of accidents 㪋㪐㪈㪋 Wakayama Prefecture 892.7 Hyogo Prefecture 125.5 㪋㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪇 Tokushima Prefecture 863.0 Tokyo Metropolis 121.9 Number of accidents / and casualities 㪇 㪇 Nationwide 717.7 Nationwide 101.1 9 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 0 Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research 200 and Data Analysis) 195 196 197 197 198 198 199 199 200 200 194 195 196 Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis) Fig. 2 Changes in number of fatalities by age group Fig. 3 Changes in number of fatalities by transport modes ■ All in all, a downward trend is evident. The number of ■ Fatalities “in a vehicle” decreased noticeably; and since 2008, fatalities is high for the elderly (65 and over). It has sharply “in a vehicle” fatalities have been less than “while walking” decreased for those aged 20 to 29 (which is less than that for fatalities. age 50 to 59). In a vehicle 㪊㪌㪇㪇 㪎㪇㪇㪇 Age 65 and over On a motorcycle 㪊㪇㪇㪇 㪍㪇㪇㪇 On a bicycle While walking While walking 㪉㪌㪇㪇 㪉㪋㪌㪉 㪌㪇㪇㪇 Other In a vehicle Age 40-49 Age 20-29 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪋㪇㪇㪇 Age 16-19 㪈㪌㪇㪇 㪊㪇㪇㪇 Age 50-59 㪈㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪈㪎㪈㪎 Number of fatalities On a motorcycle 㪌㪉㪊 㪈㪍㪇㪇 Age 30-39 㪋㪎㪍 On a bicycle 㪏㪏㪍 㪌㪇㪇 㪊㪏㪉 㪈㪇㪇㪇 㪊㪎㪉 㪍㪐㪌 Age 60-69 㪊㪎㪈 Age 15 and under 㪉㪉㪎 Other 㪈㪍 㪇 㪈㪈㪈 㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪐 㪈㪐㪎㪇 㪈㪐㪎㪌 㪈㪐㪐㪇 㪈㪐㪐㪌 㪈㪐㪍㪇 㪈㪐㪍㪌 㪈㪐㪌㪌 㪈㪐㪏㪇 㪈㪐㪏㪌 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪌 㪈㪐㪏㪈 㪈㪐㪐㪈 㪈㪐㪐㪋 㪉㪇㪇㪈 㪉㪇㪇㪋 㪈㪐㪎㪐 㪈㪐㪏㪇 㪈㪐㪏㪉 㪈㪐㪏㪌 㪈㪐㪏㪎 㪈㪐㪏㪏 㪈㪐㪐㪇 㪈㪐㪐㪊 㪈㪐㪐㪌 㪈㪐㪐㪍 㪈㪐㪐㪏 㪉㪇㪇㪎 㪈㪐㪏㪊 㪈㪐㪏㪋 㪈㪐㪏㪍 㪈㪐㪏㪐 㪈㪐㪐㪉 㪈㪐㪐㪎 㪈㪐㪐㪐 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪊 㪉㪇㪇㪍 㪉㪇㪇㪐 㪉㪇㪇㪉 㪉㪇㪇㪌 㪉㪇㪇㪏 Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis) and Data Analysis) 24 TRANSPORT POLICY IN PERSPECTIVE: 2010 Fig. 4 Changes in the percentage of seatbelt use and Fig. 5 Changes in percentage of seatbelt use by position mortality rate in vehicle ■ The more people wear seatbelts, the lower the mortality rate ■ Thanks to revisions in the Road Traffic Law, the percentage tends to be. of seatbelt use by back seat passengers is increasing both on ordinary roads and on expressways. % % % e 100 0.7 100 Percentage of seatbelt use ) 90 0.6 Mortality rate 0.6 80 0.55 70 0.5 Driver’s seat 0.47 93.3 0.5 60 (ordinary road) 90 88.8 89.1 91.3 Passenger front seat 0.41 88.3 50 (ordinary road) 87.2 89.1 0.4 Back seat (ordinary 86.4 40 road) 87.5 0.39 Driver’s seat 0.38 30 (expressway) 84.1 0.3 0.34 20 Passenger front seat 0.31 (expressway) 0.29 81.8 0.28 10 Back seat Percentage of seatbelt us (expressway) 80 0.2 Mortality rate (in a vehicle 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 199 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: White Paper on Traffic Safety in Japan 2010 Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis) Fig. 6 Changes in incidence of bicycle accidents Fig. 7 Changes in traffic fatalities worldwide, by country involving pedestrians (per 100,000 inhabitants) ■ Accidents involving bicyclists and pedestrians are rapidly increasing. ੱ 㪊㪌 㪌㪅㪇㪇 Number of bicyclist-pedestrian accidents 㪊㪇㪅㪇 Number of accidents between bicycles 㪋㪅㪊㪎 㪋㪅㪌㪈 South Korea 㪋㪅㪌㪇 㪉㪏㪅㪇 㪊㪇 Percentage of bicycle accidents among all traffic accidents 㪋㪅㪇㪎 㪋㪅㪇㪇 㪉㪍㪅㪇 㪊㪅㪐㪋 Germany 㪊㪅㪌㪇 㪊㪅㪌㪋 㪉㪋㪅㪇 㪉㪌 France 㪊㪅㪇㪎 㪉㪅㪏㪐 Italy 㪊㪅㪇㪇 㪉㪅㪏㪌 㪉㪉㪅㪇 France 㪉㪇㪅㪌 㪉㪇 Netherlands 㪉㪅㪌㪇 㪉㪇㪅㪇 U.S.A. Italy 㪈㪏㪅㪉 㪈㪏㪅㪎 㪈㪏㪅㪌 㪈㪐㪅㪇 U.K. 㪈㪏㪅㪈 㪈㪎㪅㪏 㪈㪐㪅㪉 㪈㪐㪅㪎 㪈㪐㪅㪎 㪈㪐㪅㪍 㪉㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪏㪅㪇 㪈㪌 U.S.A. 㪈㪅㪌㪇 㪈㪅㪉㪎 㪈㪍㪅㪇 South Korea 㪈㪅㪇㪋 㪈㪅㪉㪈 Japan 㪈㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪅㪉㪍 㪈㪅㪉㪐 㪈㪅㪊㪊 㪈㪅㪊㪇 㪈㪇 㪈㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪅㪇㪐 㪈㪅㪉㪊 㪈㪅㪉㪋 㪈㪅㪉㪊 㪈㪋㪅㪇 㪈㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪅㪇㪈 㪇㪅㪌㪇 㪈㪉㪅㪇 㪌 㪇㪅㪇㪇 㪈㪇㪅㪇 U.K. Netherlands Japan Germany 㪇 㪈㪐㪐㪐 㪉㪇㪇㪈 㪉㪇㪇㪉 㪉㪇㪇㪊 㪉㪇㪇㪌 㪈㪐㪐㪎 㪈㪐㪐㪏 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪋 㪉㪇㪇㪎 㪉㪇㪇㪍 㪈㪐㪐㪇 㪈㪐㪐㪈 㪈㪐㪐㪉 㪈㪐㪐㪊 㪈㪐㪐㪋 㪈㪐㪐㪐 㪉㪇㪇㪇 㪉㪇㪇㪈 㪉㪇㪇㪉 㪉㪇㪇㪊 㪉㪇㪇㪏 㪈㪐㪎㪇 㪈㪐㪏㪇 㪈㪐㪐㪌 㪈㪐㪐㪍 㪈㪐㪐㪎 㪈㪐㪐㪏 㪉㪇㪇㪋 㪉㪇㪇㪌 㪉㪇㪇㪍 㪉㪇㪇㪎 Source: White Paper on Traffic Safety in Japan 2008 Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis) Table 2 Traffic fatalities worldwide, by situation (2008) Table 3 Number of traffic fatalities worldwide by age group (2007) Situation Number of In a car On a On a On a While Other Age Number of 5 and 6-9 10-14 15-17 18-20 21-24 25-64 65 and Unknown Country fatalities motorcycle moped bicycle walking Country fatalities under over Germany 㪋㪃㪋㪎㪎 㪉㪃㪊㪍㪏 㪍㪌㪍 㪈㪈㪇 㪋㪌㪍 㪍㪌㪊 㪉㪊㪋 Germany 㪋㪃㪋㪎㪎 㪊㪌 㪈㪐 㪋㪏 㪈㪎㪋 㪋㪊㪍 㪋㪌㪈 㪉㪃㪉㪋㪉 㪈㪃㪇㪍㪍 㪍 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪌㪉㪅㪐 㪈㪋㪅㪎 㪉㪅㪌 㪈㪇㪅㪉 㪈㪋㪅㪍 㪌㪅㪉 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪏 㪇㪅㪋 㪈㪅㪈 㪊㪅㪐 㪐㪅㪎 㪈㪇㪅㪈 㪌㪇㪅㪈 㪉㪊㪅㪏 㪇㪅㪈 France 㪋㪃㪉㪎㪌 㪉㪃㪉㪇㪌 㪎㪐㪌 㪉㪐㪈 㪈㪋㪏 㪌㪋㪏 㪉㪏㪏 France 㪋㪃㪉㪎㪌 㪋㪉 㪉㪌 㪌㪏 㪈㪎㪉 㪋㪉㪋 㪌㪊㪋 㪉㪃㪉㪇㪐 㪏㪈㪈 㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪌㪈㪅㪍 㪈㪏㪅㪍 㪍㪅㪏 㪊㪅㪌 㪈㪉㪅㪏 㪍㪅㪎 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪍 㪈㪅㪋 㪋㪅㪇 㪐㪅㪐 㪈㪉㪅㪌 㪌㪈㪅㪎 㪈㪐㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪇 Netherlands 㪍㪎㪎 㪊㪊㪇 㪍㪎 㪋㪊 㪈㪋㪌 㪌㪍 㪊㪍 Netherlands 㪍㪎㪎 㪍 㪉 㪈㪌 㪊㪉 㪋㪎 㪍㪇 㪊㪋㪈 㪈㪎㪋 㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪋㪏㪅㪎 㪐㪅㪐 㪍㪅㪋 㪉㪈㪅㪋 㪏㪅㪊 㪌㪅㪊 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪐 㪇㪅㪊 㪉㪅㪉 㪋㪅㪎 㪍㪅㪐 㪏㪅㪐 㪌㪇㪅㪋 㪉㪌㪅㪎 㪇㪅㪇 U.K. 㪉㪃㪍㪋㪌 㪈㪃㪊㪉㪊 㪋㪏㪏 㪉㪈 㪈㪈㪎 㪌㪐㪈 㪈㪇㪌 U.K. 㪉㪃㪍㪋㪌 㪊㪇 㪉㪊 㪌㪎 㪈㪍㪇 㪉㪎㪉 㪉㪎㪇 㪈㪃㪊㪊㪊 㪋㪐㪐㪅㪇 㪈 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪌㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪏㪅㪋 㪇㪅㪏 㪋㪅㪋 㪉㪉㪅㪊 㪋㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪅㪈 㪇㪅㪐 㪉㪅㪉 㪍㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪅㪊 㪈㪇㪅㪉 㪌㪇㪅㪋 㪈㪏㪅㪐 㪇㪅㪇 U.S.A. 㪊㪎㪃㪉㪍㪈 㪈㪋㪃㪌㪏㪎 㪌㪃㪉㪇㪇 㪐㪇 㪎㪈㪍 㪋㪃㪊㪎㪏 㪈㪉㪃㪉㪎㪐 U.S.A. 㪊㪎㪃㪉㪍㪈 㪋㪐㪎 㪊㪈㪇 㪌㪋㪇 㪈㪃㪌㪐㪍 㪊㪃㪈㪏㪎 㪊㪃㪐㪋㪇 㪉㪈㪃㪌㪎㪐 㪌㪃㪌㪊㪊 㪎㪐 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪊㪐㪅㪈 㪈㪋㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪉 㪈㪅㪐 㪈㪈㪅㪎 㪊㪊㪅㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪅㪊 㪇㪅㪏 㪈㪅㪋 㪋㪅㪊 㪏㪅㪍 㪈㪇㪅㪍 㪌㪎㪅㪐 㪈㪋㪅㪏 㪇㪅㪉 South Korea 㪌㪃㪏㪎㪇 㪈㪃㪊㪋㪉 㪎㪋㪇 㪋㪐㪇 㪊㪈㪇 㪉㪃㪈㪊㪎 㪏㪌㪈 South Korea 㪌㪃㪏㪎㪇 㪍㪐 㪌㪍 㪍㪍 㪈㪏㪐 㪈㪈㪍 㪊㪈㪐 㪊㪃㪋㪊㪍 㪈㪃㪍㪈㪌 㪋 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪉㪉㪅㪐 㪈㪉㪅㪍 㪏㪅㪊 㪌㪅㪊 㪊㪍㪅㪋 㪈㪋㪅㪌 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪈㪅㪉 㪈㪅㪇 㪈㪅㪈 㪊㪅㪉 㪉㪅㪇 㪌㪅㪋 㪌㪏㪅㪌 㪉㪎㪅㪌 㪇㪅㪈 Japan 㪍㪃㪇㪉㪊 㪈㪃㪉㪍㪐 㪍㪊㪎 㪌㪉㪍 㪐㪎㪈 㪈㪃㪐㪎㪍 㪍㪋㪋 Japan 㪍㪃㪇㪉㪊 㪌㪌 㪋㪌 㪋㪌 㪈㪊㪋 㪉㪎㪋 㪉㪋㪎 㪉㪃㪉㪎㪊 㪉㪃㪐㪌㪇 㪇 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪉㪈㪅㪈 㪈㪇㪅㪍 㪏㪅㪎 㪈㪍㪅㪈 㪊㪉㪅㪏 㪈㪇㪅㪎 㪈㪇㪇㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪐 㪇㪅㪎 㪇㪅㪎 㪉㪅㪉 㪋㪅㪌 㪋㪅㪈 㪊㪎㪅㪎 㪋㪐㪅㪇 㪇㪅㪇 Upper figure: number of fatalities; Lower figure: percentage of total (%) Upper figure: number of fatalities; Lower figure: percentage of total (%) For countries that used the coefficient to convert the number of fatalities For countries that used the coefficient to convert the number of fatalities into a 30-day figure, the total may not represent the sum of each figure. into a 30-day figure, the total may not represent the sum of each figure. Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research Source: Traffic Statistics 2009 (Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis) and Data Analysis) 25 2. Efforts to Assure Safe and Comfortable Mobility Motor Vehicle Insurance in Professor, College of Law, Nihon University Yasuo Fukuda 2-2 Japan A noteworthy characteristic of motor vehicle insurance in Japan is its two-tiered structure. The first tier is the compulsory liability insurance program in which all motor vehicles are required by law to be enrolled; The second is a voluntary program in which the motor vehicle owner may or may not choose to enroll. The compulsory liability insurance is tied to the automobile inspection program, and almost 100% of motor vehicles are found to be enrolled in it.
Recommended publications
  • The Bike- Share Planning Guide
    THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 1 Introduction Sub 2 THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 3 The Bike-share Planning Guide Cover Photo: Mexico City's Ecobici has helped to increase cycling mode share in Mexico City. Cover Photo By: Udayalaksmanakartiyasa Halim 9 East 19th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10003 tel +1 212 629 8001 www.itdp.org Introduction Sub 4 Authors and Acknowledgements The writing of this report was a collaborative effort across ITDP and our partners. Contributing authors include: Aimee Gauthier, Colin Hughes, Christopher Kost, Shanshan Li, Clarisse Linke, Stephanie Lotshaw, Jacob Mason, Carlosfelipe Pardo, Clara Rasore, Bradley Schroeder, and Xavier Treviño. The authors would also like to thank Christopher Van Eyken, Jemilah Magnusson, and Gabriel Lewenstein for their support in the creation of the guide. ITDP is especially grateful to the following people for providing comments on and contributions to sections of this report: Alison Cohen, Director of Bike Share Services, Toole Design Group (with many thanks to Shomik Mehndiratta and the World Bank for their support of Ms. Cohen’s research) Dani Simons, Director of Marketing, NYC Bike Share Matteo Martignoni, International Human Powered Vehicle Association and former ITDP board member Jeff Olson, Alta Planning and Design Chris Holben, former Project Manager for Capital Bikeshare District Department of Transportation. Introduction Sub 5 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 The Benefits of Bike-share 14 1.2 History of Bike-share 19 1.3 New Developments and Trends 25 1.4 Building Political Will 26 1.5 Elements of Bike-share 27 2 THE PLANNING PROCESS 28 AND FEASIBILITY STUDY 2.1 Overview of Planning Process 30 2.2 Feasibility Study 32 2.3 Bike-Share Metrics 40 2.3.1 Basic Context Data and System Metrics 40 2.3.2 Performance Metrics 41 2.4 Coverage Area 43 2.5 System Sizing: Three Basic 44 Planning Parameters 2.6 Financial Analysis 48 3 DETAILED PLANNING AND DESIGN 52 3.1 Station Location 57 3.2 Station Sizing 63 3.3 Station Type and Design 64 3.3.1 Manual vs.
    [Show full text]
  • REVERSE INNOVATION Rethinking Urban Transport Through Global Learning Imprint
    REVERSE INNOVATION Rethinking Urban Transport through Global Learning Imprint Publisher: Authors: German Environment Agency Section I 3, German Environment Agency PO Box 14 06 Alina Ulrich, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale D-06813 Dessau-Roßlau Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Phone: +49 340-2103-0 [email protected] Editors: www.umweltbundesamt.de Claudia Kiso, German Environment Agency Elena Scherer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale //umweltbundesamt.deumweltbundesamt.de Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH //umweltbundesamtumweltbundesamt Citation: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale UBA/GIZ (2017) Reverse Innovation – Rethinking Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Urban Transport through Global Learning, German Environment Agency. Dessau-Roßlau, 09/2017. Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Design: hauer+dörfler GmbH Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 53113 Bonn, Germany Publication as pdf: Phone: +49 228 44 60-0 https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publications Fax: +49 228 44 60-17 66 Photo credits: Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1–5 Cover: shutterstock.com 65760 Eschborn Manfred Breithaupt (S. 5), Amit Bhatt (Raahgiri Day), Daniel Phone: +49 61 96 79-0 Bongardt (MoBike und E-Bus), Fotolia: Philip Lange (S. 8), Fax: +49 61 96 79-11 15 mmphoto (S. 9), Arimbi Jinca (Go-Jek), Carol Mutiso (MPesa), Samira Negm (Raye7), Lincoln Paiva (Permanent Parklets), Email: [email protected] Shengyang Sun (MoBike und E-Bus), Shutterstock.comShutterstock.com:: Internet: www.giz.de Efired (S.7), lornet (S.10), Kalpana Viswanath (SafetiPin), Claudia Weyandt (Gogoro) Last update
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Intention to Use Commercial Bike-Sharing Systems: an Integration of TAM and TPB
    Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences j 2018 Understanding the Intention to Use Commercial Bike-sharing Systems: An Integration of TAM and TPB Ying Yu Wenjie Yi Yuanyue Feng College of Management College of Management College of Management Shenzhen University Shenzhen University Shenzhen University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jia Liu College of Management Shenzhen University [email protected] Abstract economy (i.e., collaborative finance, peer-to-peer accommodation, peer-to-peer transportation, on- Commercial bike-sharing system is growing demand household services, on-demand professional rapidly as a critical form of the sharing economy. services) could generate a revenue of $335 billion Although past research has discussed the design and worldwide by 2025 [40]. It is noted that the surge of operation of commercial bike-sharing systems, there sharing economy is related to the pursuit of better have been few studies examining the factors value distribution of the supply chain [35], reduction motivating the use of such systems. This study of ecological impacts [57], technology advancement integrates the technology acceptance model (TAM) and finally, users’ changing attitudes towards product and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to develop ownership and their desire for social connections [12]. a holistic model to explain the intention to use The sharing economy manifests in various forms, commercial bike-sharing systems. The PLS-SEM such as peer-to-peer (or P2P) rental market, results from a survey with 286 users reveal that the accommodation sharing, and the vehicle sharing [40]. intention to use commercial bike-sharing systems is A prominent business model of the sharing economy, positively affected by perceived usefulness of the the commercial bike-sharing systems, has emerged in system, attitude toward bike-sharing and perceived recent years as a popular way of public transportation behavioral control.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society Organisations Advancing Cycling
    Civil Society Organisations Advancing Cycling Reflections on the Bicycle Partnership Program Experiences| Interface for cycling expertise The role of CSO’s in the implementation of public bicycle systems February 2011 Authors Jeroen Buis Zé Lobo Reviewers Tom Godefrooij Irene Frieling Interface for Cycling Expertise [email protected] 26 | Interface for Cycling Expertise | 333 The role of CSO’s in the implementation of public bicycle systems 3.1 Introduction 3.1.13.1.13.1.1 About this essay This essay is about public bicycle systems and the role that civil society organisations (CSOs) can play in the set up and management of these systems. In the past decade urban public bicycle systems have mushroomed around the globe as a successful form of non%motorised public transport. Dozens of systems have been implemented in Europe, but their popularity has recently also spread to North%America, South%America and Asia. In this essay, special attention will be paid to public bicycle systems in developing countries; a very new and interesting phenomenon. This essay is of interest for those who want to understand more about public bicycle systems in general and about public bicycle systems in developing countries and the possible role of CSOs in the process, in particular. The essay should also be of interest to policy makers in cities which consider implementing a public bicycle system and to CSOs that want to push the issue. In most cases public bicycle systems are implemented by a company which works together with the local authority. In some cases however, civil society organisations, in most cases organisations representing certain groups of urban cyclists, have played a role in the development, implementation and for promotion of these systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Overall Bike Effectiveness As a Sustainability Metric for Bike Sharing Systems
    sustainability Article Overall Bike Effectiveness as a Sustainability Metric for Bike Sharing Systems Bernardo Nugroho Yahya Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 81-Oedae-ro, Mohyeon-myeon, Cheoin-gu, Yongin, Gyeonggi-do 17035, Korea; [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-330-4941 Received: 29 September 2017; Accepted: 4 November 2017; Published: 14 November 2017 Abstract: Bike sharing systems (BSS) have been widely accepted as an urban transport scheme in many cities around the world. The concept is recently expanded and followed by many cities to offer citizen a “green” and flexible transportation scheme in urban areas. Many works focus on the issues of bike availability while the bike performance, i.e., life cycle issues and its sustainability, for better management has been abandoned. As a consequence, mismanagement of BSS would lead to cost inefficiency and, the worst case, end with operation termination. This study proposes a design science approach by developing an Overall Bike Effectiveness (OBE) framework. By incorporating the concept of overall equipment analysis (OEE), the proposed framework is used to measure the bike utilization. Accordingly, the OBE is extended into Theoretical OBE to measure the sustainability of the early-stage of BSS. The framework has been verified and evaluated using a real dataset of BSS. The proposed method provides valuable results for benchmarking, life cycle analysis, system expansion and strategy planning toward sustainability. The paper concludes with a discussion to show the impact of the proposed approach into the real practices of BSS including an outlook toward sustainability of BSS. Keywords: bike sharing system; overall bike effectiveness; sustainability 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appling Block-Chain for Bike Sharing Smart Contract
    International Journal of Advances in Electronics and Computer Science, ISSN(p): 2394-2835 Volume-6, Issue-5, May-2019 http://iraj.in APPLING BLOCK-CHAIN FOR BIKE SHARING SMART CONTRACT 1IUON-CHANG LIN, 2YUNG-CHEN CHOU, 3TZU-CHUN LIAO 1,3Department of Management Information Systems, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo-Kuang Road, Taichung, Taiwan 1Department of Photonics and Communication Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan 2Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, 50 Lioufeng RD., Wufeng, Taichung 41354, Taiwan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract - People's awareness of environment has risen in recent years, more and more energy saving and carbon reduction policy were popularized and got attention by the government, people were also gradually changing their habits and customs to rejoin the concept of green life style. Bike rental service combine sightseeing with exercise, is always a popular public transport. In Taiwan, Youbike is a well-known brand of public bike rental service, however, in China, they have another type of bike rental service, which is a fully station-less bicycle-sharing system. Except to find out the difference between the two type of bike rental service and each of their problems, this research also wants to solve current bike rental service encountered difficulties by using blockchain technology and smart contract, and to make a feasible solution for the realization of bicycle sharing economy. Keywords - Blockchain, Smart Contract, Sharing Economy, Bike Rental I. INTRODUCTION Denmark, Germany and France, America also have their own bike sharing system. But compared with Bicycle rental service has been in place for years, now China’s bike sharing markets, Europe and the United the trend of sharing economy also goes viral on States seems not so strong as China, some operators bicycle market.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Bike Share Program Planning and Design
    Victoria Bike Share Program Plannin g and Design 2012 Jessie Abraham Tim Cheng Ryan Cook Lee Haney Callum McClure Alasdair Rothnie Philip Sikorski Prepared for the City of Victoria 11/30/2012 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SITE SELECTION CRITERIA DEMAND 3 SUPPLY 11 ADMINISTRATIVE & MARKET RESEARCH 18 SITE SELECTION 25 ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 38 REFERENCES 53 2 DEMAND A key component of Site Selection Criteria is determining demand levels required for the Bike Share Program. The feasibility of the program will be based on demographics of the City of Victoria, including population size & density, topography and climate. Demand will not only be determined by number of residents, but also by non-residents resulting from the tourist industry. In consideration of seasonal population variations, climate will also play a role in ridership throughout the year. By evaluating existing conditions of the city and comparing them to other bike share programs worldwide, we can determine the number of bikes required for the City of Victoria. POPULATION SIZE & DENSITY POPULATION GROWTH • In 2008, the Capital Region as a whole had a population of about 364,000, while the City of Victoria had a population of approximately 83,000, and the Downtown Core Area had a population of about 6,050. • According to population forecasts from the Capital Regional District (CRD), the Capital Region’s population will increase to 390,000 by 2016, and to 475,000 by 2038. This represents a 31 percent increase, or 111,000 new residents, in the next 30 years. The CRD estimates that Victoria’s share of that growth will be approximately an additional 20,000 residents, for a total population of just over 100,000 by 2041.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike-Share Opportunities in New York City
    BIKE-SHARE OPPORTUNITIES IN NEW YORK CITY NYC Dept. City Planning | Spring 2009 AcknowledgementsandSpecialThanks The authors of this report would like to thank the following people for their assistance and time over the course of this project: Alain Ayott, Executive Vice-President, Montreal Parking Authority/Stationnement de Montréal Josh Benson, NYC Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) David Bragdon, President, Portland METRO Council Caitlyn Brazill, NYC Department of Consumer Affairs (NYCDCA) William Carry, Mayor’s Office of Long Term Planning and Sustainability German Dector-Vega, Traffic & Highways Manager, Transit for London (TfL) Paul DeMaio, MetroBike LLC Charlie Denny, Alta Planning + Design Maria Gotsch, President and CEO, New York City Investment Fund Richard Grasso, Senior Vice President, Business Development, ClearChannel Adshel Paul Greenberg, Vice-President of Media Services, NYC & Co. Sebastien Gross, www.chezwam.org Raymond Del Porujia, City of Paris Wayne Kaylish, NYC Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications (NYDoITT) Alice Kelly, Program Manager, District DOT Donna Keren, Senior Vice President, Research & Analysis, NYC & Co. Mark Knight, Director, CityByke Karen Lee, Deputy Director, & Victoria Grimshaw, Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYCDHMH) Jenna Mandel-Ricci, Director of Special Projects & Jennifer Norton, Donna Eisenhower, Hilary Parton and Laura DiGrande, Epidemiology, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYCDHMH) Brooke Mckenna, Coordinated
    [Show full text]
  • ITDP the Bike-Share Planning Guide
    DOWNTOWN BOISE Parking Strategic Plan APPENDIX A3 The Bike-share Planning Guide THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 1 Introduction Sub 2 THE BIKE- SHARE PLANNING GUIDE Introduction Sub 3 The Bike-share Planning Guide Cover Photo: Mexico City's Ecobici has helped to increase cycling mode share in Mexico City. Cover Photo By: Udayalaksmanakartiyasa Halim 9 East 19th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10003 tel +1 212 629 8001 www.itdp.org Introduction Sub 4 Authors and Acknowledgements The writing of this report was a collaborative effort across ITDP and our partners. Contributing authors include: Aimee Gauthier, Colin Hughes, Christopher Kost, Shanshan Li, Clarisse Linke, Stephanie Lotshaw, Jacob Mason, Carlosfelipe Pardo, Clara Rasore, Bradley Schroeder, and Xavier Treviño. The authors would also like to thank Christopher Van Eyken, Jemilah Magnusson, and Gabriel Lewenstein for their support in the creation of the guide. ITDP is especially grateful to the following people for providing comments on and contributions to sections of this report: Alison Cohen, Director of Bike Share Services, Toole Design Group (with many thanks to Shomik Mehndiratta and the World Bank for their support of Ms. Cohen’s research) Dani Simons, Director of Marketing, NYC Bike Share Matteo Martignoni, International Human Powered Vehicle Association and former ITDP board member Jeff Olson, Alta Planning and Design Chris Holben, former Project Manager for Capital Bikeshare District Department of Transportation. Introduction Sub 5 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Management of Bike Sharing Systems for Sustainable Urban Transport: Konya, Kayseri and Istanbul Cases
    PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT: KONYA, KAYSERİ AND İSTANBUL CASES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY CİHAN ERÇETİN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE PROGRAM OF URBAN POLICY PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS JUNE 2014 i Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assist. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Adnan Barlas (METU,CRP) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe (METU,CRP) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Çağatay Keskinok (METU,UPL) ii PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Cihan Erçetin Signature : iii ABSTRACT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT: KONYA, KAYSERİ AND İSTANBUL CASES Erçetin, Cihan M.S.c., Urban Policy Planning and Local Governments, Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe June, 2014, 230 pages Considering the problems of traffic congestion, energy dependency and air pollution depending on excessive use of private car, different transport alternatives to ensure sustainable urban transportation have come into question.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Dock-Less Bike-Sharing Model the Market Situation and Underlying Implications
    Master’s Degree programme in Languages, Economics and Institutions of Asia and North Africa Second Cycle (D.M. 270/2004) Final Thesis Chinese dock-less bike-sharing model The market situation and underlying implications Supervisor Ch. Prof. Renzo Riccardo Cavalieri Assistant Supervisor Ch. Prof. Lala Hu Graduand Anna Zhu Matriculation Number 846501 Academic Year 2017 / 2018 SUMMARY 前言 ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 8 CHAPTER 1 – BIKE-SHARING: HISTORY AND THE MARKET .............................................................................. 11 1.1 BIKE-SHARING: DEFINITION AND TERMINOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 11 1.1.1 Bike-sharing: four generations history and characteristics ................................................................. 13 1.1.2 Bike-sharing schemes features ............................................................................................................ 29 1.1.3 Business models ................................................................................................................................... 32 1.1.4 Bike-sharing schemes operations .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • User Profiles and Adoption Attributes of Innovative Bike-Sharing Systems: the Case of Bicimad (Madrid)
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS USER PROFILES AND ADOPTION ATTRIBUTES OF INNOVATIVE BIKE-SHARING SYSTEMS: THE CASE OF BICIMAD (MADRID) TESIS DOCTORAL ANDRÁS CSABA MUNKÁCSY Máster en Ciencias Económicas 2017 DEPARTAMENTO DE INGENIERÍA CIVIL: TRANSPORTE Y TERRITORIO ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS USER PROFILES AND ADOPTION ATTRIBUTES OF INNOVATIVE BIKE-SHARING SYSTEMS: THE CASE OF BICIMAD (MADRID) ANDRÁS CSABA MUNKÁCSY Máster en Ciencias Económicas Director de tesis: ANDRÉS MONZÓN DE CÁCERES Doctor Ingeniero de Caminos, Canales y Puertos 2017 Tribunal nombrado por el Mgfco. y Excmo. Sr. Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, el día 18 de julio de 2017. Presidente: D. Javier Gutiérrez Puebla, Catedrático de Universidad Facultad de Geografía e Historia – Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Vocal: D. David Lois García, Profesor Ayudante Doctor Facultad de Psicología – Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) Vocal: D. Álvaro Fernández Heredia, Profesor Adjunto Escuela de Arquitectura, Ingeniería y Diseño – Universidad Europea de Madrid Vocal: Dña. Sigal Kaplan, Associate Professor Department of Transport – Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Secretario: Dña. María Eugenia López Lambas, Profesora Contrada Doctora ETSI Caminos, Canales y Puertos – Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Suplente: D. Julio Alberto Soria Lara, Profesor Ayudante Doctor ETSI Caminos, Canales y Puertos – Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Suplente: D. Imre Keserű, Postdoctoral Researcher MOBI – Vrije Universiteit Brussel Realizado el acto de defensa y lectura de la Tesis el día _____ de __________ de 2017 en la E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Canales, Caminos y Puertos de la U.P.M.
    [Show full text]