Cnemidocarpa Nisiotis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cnemidocarpa Nisiotis Phylogenetic and Phylogeographic Study of the New Zealand Endemic Sea Tunicate Cnemidocarpa nisiotis Genievive Manalo del Mundo A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Zoology School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury, Christchurch New Zealand January 2009 1 Abstract New Zealand is an isolated island nation and more than 95% of its commodities are imported by ship, making New Zealand particularly vulnerable to marine bioinvasion. Its marine biota and ecosystem are unique with numerous endemic organisms, and it is a biodiversity hotspot of global significance. The objective of this study was to integrate invasive theory with phylogeographic studies on a native ascidian. This study was motivated by the introduction of an invasive ascidian, Styela clava to New Zealand. To date, S. clava’s cytochrome oxidase I (COI) data indicate limited sharing of haplotypes between the ports of Lyttelton and Auckland, and areas within Hauraki Gulf. The connectivity between these disparate sites may be a consequence either of common overseas origins via international shipping or local vectoring within New Zealand by coastal shipping. In this thesis I have examined the phylogeographic relationships among populations of an endemic ascidian, Cnemidocarpa nisiotis, to attempt to gauge the likely role that local vectoring plays in the movement of ascidians and other species among New Zealand ports. This study also provides the first population genetic information on a native New Zealand ascidian An endemic New Zealand ascidian was chosen as the study species because the use of an endemic species excludes or at least reduces the possibility of external input from overseas sites con-founding any patterns observed in the data. Furthermore, by excluding external input, the pattern of genetic diversity observed in this species might enable us to determine if local shipping pathways are homogenising C. nisiotis populations. C. nisiotis individuals were collected inside and outside of ports and marinas around Haruaki Gulf, Wellington, Lyttelton, and Dunedin harbours. Each individual were dissected and morphologically identified. Morphological identification of C. nisiotis matched type specimen (Chapter 2). However, preliminary results with COI haplotype network revealed three lineages (A, B and C) and such was the level of differences among these lineages raised the question of the possibility of a cryptic species. This 2 hypothesis was further investigated with phylogenetic analysis using both COI and 18S ribosomal DNA sequence data. Phylogeographic analysis of C. nisiotis COI molecular data demonstrated no significant population genetic structure, with a single common haplotype shared between the North and South islands (Chapter 4). Sharing of haplotypes was also evident between harbours in the South Island and within sites where population samples from inside ports, marinas, and natural habitats were not significantly different from each other. The lack of difference between the North and South Island for this species was surprising given that it was believed to have limited dispersal ability in the absence of anthropogenic movement. However, C. nisiotis displays a star-like phylogeny indicative of a selective sweep, population bottleneck or founder event followed by a population range expansion, thus the lack of difference between islands may be a consequence of too little evolutionary time having passed since the populations shared a common origin for differentiation to have occurred. 3 Acknowledgements Obtaining my MSc degree has always been a life long dream for me and this last two years I have been helped, supported and befriended by many wonderful people who have helped me complete this dream. This project has been one of the most awesome experiences in my life and without you all I would not have been able to complete this research. I especially want to give my gratitude to my supervisors Neil Gemmell, Sharyn Goldstien and Marie Hale. Thank you very much for your support, guidance and patience. Neil- thanks for always being supportive and for encouraging conference participation. Marie- thanks for going through the laborious task of wading through my thesis and being available for last minute questions regarding analysis. Sharyn -thank you very much for training me from the beginning to the end. You were always available, from text messaging me in the field, training me in the laboratory and with computer programs, giving me advice and making sure that I am on track at all times. I would not have been able to complete this project without you. Thank you for being a friend as well as my supervisor. I feel fortunate to have all three of you as my supervisors. I would like to thank everyone in the Molecular Ecology Lab. I feel very lucky for being part of such a fun and diverse group. I have enjoyed working and socialising with all of you. Thank you for providing me assistance and advice for troubleshooting laboratory protocols, as well as teaching me how to work the computer programs needed for my project. I want to give extra thanks to Margaret Will, Antoine Fouquet, Tammy Steeves and Maggie Tisch. I am particularly thankful to Melanie Pierson for letting me stay at her house when I first arrived in New Zealand. One of the perks of this project is going on road trips to collect samples. I would like to give my thanks to Nikki Hawes and Petra Hust for going out of their way to help me collect ascidians. In particular, I need to thank Morten Hust for his effort and enthusiasm in making my field equipment. Thanks for all your hard work and good times. 4 I would like to thank NIWA and MAF Biosecurity New Zealand for letting me have access to the port samples. In particular I would like to thank Mike Page for his expertise in taxonomical identification of ascidians and introducing the bucket methodology, which aided a lot during my field collection. Thank you for training me how to morphologically identify C. nisiotis. In addition, I would also like to thank Anna Bradley, Kimberly Seaward and Graeme Inglis. I would like to thank University staff, students, and friends for helping me with administrative issues and giving me smiles in days when I was in need of some encouragement. This experience would not have been complete without my wonderful friends in New Zealand. In particular, I would like to thank Kerry O’ Connell, Paul South, Laura de Haro and Tracy Melzer. Thanks for all the good times. One of the most painful tasks was handing in drafts numerous times to my advisors. Thank you Regina Eustaquio and Christian Mendieta for proofreading my drafts also, I like to thank Erica Mendieta for all her support during my first year in New Zealand. My family has been so supportive throughout this period in my life and I want to give my sincerest gratitude to my parents and siblings. It was hard moving away from you all but your love and support across the globe have kept me going and I am very lucky to have such a loving family. My greatest appreciation goes to my mentors Leo Ortiz and Mary Silver. They both have always motivated me to pursue graduate school. I am grateful that I have both of you as my role models. You both have a lot of passion for teaching and helping students and I am grateful to have you both to look up to. You have both given me a lot of helpful advice that kept me going these last few years. I always walked out of your office ready and prepared for the challenges ahead of me. I have now experienced one of the most challenging times of in my life and you both have helped prepare me for, writing a thesis. Finally, I am extremely grateful for the Minority Health International Training Foundation for funding my research. 5 Table of Content Chapter I General Introduction 1.1 Phylogeography.................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Phylogeography in New Zealand ......................................................................... 15 1.3 A review of molecular studies in New Zealand ................................................... 15 1.3.1. Stock assessment studies .............................................................................. 16 1.3.2 Genetic discontinuity between the North and South Island .......................... 17 1.4 Marine bioinvasions ............................................................................................. 22 1.5 Ascidians .............................................................................................................. 23 1.6 Non-indigenous solitary ascidians........................................................................ 24 1.7 Study species: Cnemidocarpa nisiotis.................................................................. 25 1.8 Aims ..................................................................................................................... 26 1.9 Thesis Outline....................................................................................................... 29 Chapter II Distribution and Identification of Cnemidocarpa nisiotis 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 31 2.2 Distribution of Cnemidocarpa nisiotis ................................................................. 32 2.3 Methodology for collection of C. nisiotis............................................................. 32 2.4 Sampling locations and distribution
Recommended publications
  • Bacteria Associated with Tunicate, Polycarpa Aurata, from Lease Sea, Maluku, Indonesia Exhibiting Anti-Multidrug Resistant Bacteria
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 20, Number 4, April 2019 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 956-964 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200404 Bacteria associated with tunicate, Polycarpa aurata, from Lease Sea, Maluku, Indonesia exhibiting anti-multidrug resistant bacteria DIAH AYUNINGRUM1,5, RHESI KRISTIANA1, AYUNDA AINUN NISA2, SEPTHY KUSUMA RADJASA2, SAKTI IMAM MUCHLISSIN2,4, OCKY KARNA RADJASA2,3, AGUS SABDONO2, AGUS TRIANTO2, 1Department of Coastal Resource Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Diponegoro. Jl. Prof. Soedharto SH, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia 2Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Diponegoro. Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia. Tel.: +62-24-7474698, Fax.: +62-24-7474698, email: [email protected]. 3Directorate of Research and Community Services, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education. D Building, Jl. Jenderal Sudirman Pintu Satu, Senayan, Jakarta Pusat 10279, Indonesia 4Tropical Marine Biotechnology Laboratory, Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Lingkar Utara Undip, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia 1Department of Aquatic Resource Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Universitas Diponegoro. Jl. Prof. Soedharto SH, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia Manuscript received: 30 January 2019. Revision accepted: 10 March 2019. Abstract. Ayuningrum D, Kristiana R, Nisa AA, Radjasa SK, Muchlissin SI, Radjasa OK, Sabdono A, Trianto A. 2019. Bacteria associated with tunicate, Polycarpa aurata, from Lease Sea, Maluku, Indonesia exhibiting anti-multidrug resistant bacteria. Biodiversitas 20: 956-964. Tunicate is a rich secondary metabolites producer with various biological activities whether as an original producer or produced by the associated microorganisms. In this study, a total of 11 tunicate specimens were identified as Polycarpa aurata with four color variations based on morphological characteristic and COI gene identification and BLAST analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1471-2148-9-187.Pdf
    BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access An updated 18S rRNA phylogeny of tunicates based on mixture and secondary structure models Georgia Tsagkogeorga1,2, Xavier Turon3, Russell R Hopcroft4, Marie- Ka Tilak1,2, Tamar Feldstein5, Noa Shenkar5,6, Yossi Loya5, Dorothée Huchon5, Emmanuel JP Douzery1,2 and Frédéric Delsuc*1,2 Address: 1Université Montpellier 2, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554), CC064, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France, 2CNRS, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554), CC064, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France, 3Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB, CSIC), Accés Cala S. Francesc 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain, 4Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, 5Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel and 6Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA Email: Georgia Tsagkogeorga - [email protected]; Xavier Turon - [email protected]; Russell R Hopcroft - [email protected]; Marie-Ka Tilak - [email protected]; Tamar Feldstein - [email protected]; Noa Shenkar - [email protected]; Yossi Loya - [email protected]; Dorothée Huchon - [email protected]; Emmanuel JP Douzery - [email protected]; Frédéric Delsuc* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 5 August 2009 Received: 16 October 2008 Accepted: 5 August 2009 BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009, 9:187 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-187 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/187 © 2009 Tsagkogeorga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an Updated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Taxonomic Paper Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist Chryssanthi Antoniadou‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou§§, Nicolas Bailly ‡ Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece § Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: Chryssanthi Antoniadou ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 18 May 2016 | Accepted: 17 Jul 2016 | Published: 01 Nov 2016 Citation: Antoniadou C, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N (2016) Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Abstract Background The checklist of the ascidian fauna (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) of Greece was compiled within the framework of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS), an application of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) aiming to produce a complete checklist of species recorded from Greece. This checklist was constructed by updating an existing one with the inclusion of recently published records. All the reported species from Greek waters were taxonomically revised and cross-checked with the Ascidiacea World Database. New information The updated checklist of the class Ascidiacea of Greece comprises 75 species, classified in 33 genera, 12 families, and 3 orders. In total, 8 species have been added to the previous species list (4 Aplousobranchia, 2 Phlebobranchia, and 2 Stolidobranchia). Aplousobranchia was the most speciose order, followed by Stolidobranchia. Most species belonged to the families Didemnidae, Polyclinidae, Pyuridae, Ascidiidae, and Styelidae; these 4 families comprise 76% of the Greek ascidian species richness. The present effort revealed the limited taxonomic research effort devoted to the ascidian fauna of Greece, © Antoniadou C et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Chordata Bateson, 1885
    Checklist of the Invertebrate Chordata and the Hemichordata of British Columbia (Tunicates and Acorn Worms) (August, 2009) by Aaron Baldwin, PhD Candidate School of Fisheries and Ocean Science University of Alaska, Fairbanks E-mail [email protected] The following checklist contains species in the chordate subphylum Tunicata and the acorn worms which have been listed as found in British Columbia. This list is certainly incomplete. The taxonomy follows that of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS database, www.marinespecies.org) and the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS, www.itis.gov). For several families and higher taxa I was unable to locate author's names so have left these blank. Common names are mainly from Lamb and Hanby (2005). Phylum Chordata Bateson, 1885 Subpylum Tunicata Class Ascidacea Nielsen, 1995 Order Entergona Suborder Aplousobranchia Family Cionidae Genus Ciona Fleming, 1822 Ciona savignyi Herdman, 1882 Family Clavelinidae Genus Clavelina Savigny, 1816 Clavelina huntsmani Van Name, 1931 Family Didemnidae Genus Didemnum Savigny, 1816 Didemnum carnulentum Ritter and Forsyth, 1917 Didenmum sp (Lamb and Hanby, 2005) INV Genus Diplosoma Macdonald, 1859 Diplosoma listerianum (Milne-Edwards, 1841) Genus Trididemnum delle Valle, 1881 Trididemnum alexi Lambert, 2005 Family Holozoidae Genus Distaplia delle Valle, 1881 Distaplia occidentalis Bancroft, 1899 Distaplia smithi Abbot and Trason, 1968 Family Polycitoridae Genus Cystodytes von Drasche, 1884 Cystodytes lobatus (Ritter, 1900) Genus Eudistoma Caullery, 1909
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidian News #87 June 2021
    ASCIDIAN NEWS* Gretchen Lambert 12001 11th Ave. NW, Seattle, WA 98177 206-365-3734 [email protected] home page: http://depts.washington.edu/ascidian/ Number 87 June 2021 Well, here we are still in this pandemic! I asked how you all are and again received many responses. A number are included in the next two sections. Nearly everyone still expresses confidence at having met the challenges and a great feeling of accomplishment even though tired of the whole thing; congratulations to you all! There are 117 new publications since December! Thanks to so many for the contributions and for letting me know how important AN continues to be. Please keep in touch and continue to send me contributions for the next issue. Keep safe, keep working, and good luck to everyone. *Ascidian News is not part of the scientific literature and should not be cited as such. NEWS AND VIEWS 1. From Hiroki Nishida ([email protected]) : In Japan, we are very slow to be vaccinated, but the labs are ordinarily opened and we can continue working. Number of patients are gradually increasing though and we are waiting for vaccines. I have to stay in my home and the lab. Postponement of 11th ITM (International Tunicate Meeting) This is an announcement about 11th ITM that had been planned to be held in July 2021 in Kobe, Japan. It is postponed by a year because of the global spread of COVID-19. We had an 11th ITM board meeting, and came to the conclusion that we had to reschedule it for July 2022 at the same venue (Konan University, Kobe, Japan) and similar dates (July 11 to 16).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phylogeny of the Families Pyuridae and Styelidae (Stolidobranchiata
    * Manuscript 1 Phylogeny of the families Pyuridae and Styelidae (Stolidobranchiata, Ascidiacea) 2 inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences 3 4 Pérez-Portela Ra, b, Bishop JDDb, Davis ARc, Turon Xd 5 6 a Eco-Ethology Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA), Rua 7 Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal 8 9 b Marine Biological Association of United Kingdom, The Laboratory Citadel Hill, PL1 10 2PB, Plymouth, UK, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth PL4 11 8AA, Plymouth, UK 12 13 c School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522 14 Australia 15 16 d Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Accés a la Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, 17 Girona, E-17300, Spain 18 19 Email addresses: 20 Bishop JDD: [email protected] 21 Davis AR: [email protected] 22 Turon X: [email protected] 23 24 Corresponding author: 25 Rocío Pérez-Portela 26 Eco-Ethology Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA), Rua 27 Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal 28 Phone: + 351 21 8811226 29 Fax: + 351 21 8860954 30 [email protected] 31 1 32 Abstract 33 34 The Order Stolidobranchiata comprises the families Pyuridae, Styelidae and Molgulidae. 35 Early molecular data was consistent with monophyly of the Stolidobranchiata and also 36 the Molgulidae. Internal phylogeny and relationships between Styelidae and Pyuridae 37 were inconclusive however. In order to clarify these points we used mitochondrial and 38 nuclear sequences from 31 species of Styelidae and 25 of Pyuridae. Phylogenetic trees 39 recovered the Pyuridae as a monophyletic clade, and their genera appeared as 40 monophyletic with the exception of Pyura.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Keys for the Identification of Families and Genera of Atlantic
    Biota Neotropica ISSN: 1676-0611 [email protected] Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Brasil Moreira da Rocha, Rosana; Bastos Zanata, Thais; Moreno, Tatiane Regina Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians Biota Neotropica, vol. 12, núm. 1, enero-marzo, 2012, pp. 1-35 Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Campinas, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199123750022 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians Rocha, R.M. et al. Biota Neotrop. 2012, 12(1): 000-000. On line version of this paper is available from: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/en/abstract?identification-key+bn01712012012 A versão on-line completa deste artigo está disponível em: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/pt/abstract?identification-key+bn01712012012 Received/ Recebido em 16/07/2011 - Revised/ Versão reformulada recebida em 13/03/2012 - Accepted/ Publicado em 14/03/2012 ISSN 1676-0603 (on-line) Biota Neotropica is an electronic, peer-reviewed journal edited by the Program BIOTA/FAPESP: The Virtual Institute of Biodiversity. This journal’s aim is to disseminate the results of original research work, associated or not to the program, concerned with characterization, conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity within the Neotropical region. Biota Neotropica é uma revista do Programa BIOTA/FAPESP - O Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade, que publica resultados de pesquisa original, vinculada ou não ao programa, que abordem a temática caracterização, conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade na região Neotropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of a Bypass on the Oral Siphon of Ascidia Sydneiensis (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) in a Tropical Bay from South-Eastern Brazil
    OCEAN AND COASTAL NOTE https://doi.org/10.1590/s2675-28242020068344 RESEARCH Record of a bypass on the oral siphon of Ascidia sydneiensis (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) in a tropical bay from south-eastern Brazil Paulo Cezar Azevedo Silva1 , Géssica Cristine Maia Oliveira1,2 , Danielle Fernandes Barboza1,2 , Luís Felipe Skinner1,2* 1 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ/FFP) Departamento de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Rua Dr. Francisco Portela, 1470 - Patronato - São Gonçalo - 24435-005 - RJ - Brazil) 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oceanografia (PPG-OCN/UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524 - sala 4018/bloco E - Maracanã, 20550-013 - RJ - Brazil) *Corresponding author: [email protected] Ascidia sydneiensis Stimpson, 1855 is a solitary natural substrate at Ilha da Amarração, next to Ilha ascidian (Order Phlebobranchia) first described in the Grande, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil (23°10’58.0”S, China Sea and Japan. Recently, it has been recorded 44°10’47.7” W). This atypical individual had a small in subtropical and tropical regions and is abundant projection with rims and other morphological in the Caribbean (Rocha et al., 2005; Worms, 2020). features, on the tunic next to a larger oral siphon. In Brazil, it was first recorded in the São Paulo State After collection, the animal was anesthetized with (Bjornberg, 1956) and ranges from Ceará to Santa menthol and fixed in 10% formaldehyde. The Catarina (Rodrigues, 1962; Rocha and Nasser, 1998; presence of the third opening was not noticed during Rocha and Costa, 2005; Rocha and Kremmer, 2005; the removal of the animal from the substrate but was Rocha et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • An Endemic Commensal Leucothoid Discovered in the Tunicate Cnemidocarpa Bicornuta, from New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda) Kaitlyn M
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 3-25-2016 An Endemic Commensal Leucothoid Discovered in the Tunicate Cnemidocarpa bicornuta, from New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda) Kaitlyn M. Brucker Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Kaitlyn M. Brucker. 2016. An Endemic Commensal Leucothoid Discovered in the Tunicate Cnemidocarpa bicornuta, from New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, . (407) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/407. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography An Endemic Commensal Leucothoid Discovered in the Tunicate Cnemidocarpa bicornuta, from New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda) By Kaitlyn M. Brucker Submitted to the Faculty of Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography In partial fulfillment for the requirements for The degree of Master of Science with a specialty in: Marine Biology and Coastal Zone Management Nova Southeastern University March 2016 Thesis of Kaitlyn M. Brucker Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science: Marine Biology and Coastal Zone Management Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography March 2016 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor: _________________________________________ James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Moreton Bay, Queensland Patricia KOTT Honorary Associate, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Qld 4101
    VOLUME 54 Part 3 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM BRISBANE 30 DECEMBER 2010 © Queensland Museum PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au/organisation/publications/memoirs/guidetoauthors.pdf A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum A review of the Ascidiacea (Tunicata) of Moreton Bay, Queensland Patricia KOTT Honorary Associate, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Qld 4101. Email: [email protected] Citation: Kott, P. 2010 12 30. A review of the Ascidiacea (Tunicata) of Moreton Bay, Queensland. In, Davie, P.J.F. & Phillips, J.A. (Eds), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Marine Biological Workshop, The Marine Fauna and Flora of Moreton Bay, Queensland. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum – Nature 54(3): 287-297. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. ABSTRACT A review of the 95 species of the Ascidiacea recorded from Moreton Bay, Queensland shows that solitary species of Phlebobranchia and Stolidobranchia (53 species) dominate the fauna, there being few colonial species of either suborder and only 30 species of the almost exclusively colonial Aplousobranchia, eight being species of the Didemnidae recorded only from locations immediately to the north of the Bay rather than in its semi-enclosed waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidians Collected in the Weddell Sea by the RV " Polarstern " (EPOS Cruise Leg 3)
    Bull. Mus. natl. Hist, nat., Paris, 4e sér., 16, 1994, section A, n° 1 : 13-37. Ascidians collected in the Weddell Sea by the RV " Polarstern " (EPOS cruise leg 3) by Claude MONNIOT and Françoise MONNIOT Abstract. — Samples collected with several devices in the Weddell Sea contanied 36 ascidian species. Four new species are described. The anatomy and distribution of the other species are commented upon. This antarctic ascidian fauna is compared with previous results from the Antarctic Peninsula, the Ross Sea and subantarctic areas. Affinities with the deep sea fauna are considered. Résumé. — Ascidies récoltées en mer de Weddell par le RV « Polarstern » (EPOS cruise leg 3). Des échantillons récoltés par plusieurs engins dans la mer de Weddell contenaient 36 espèces d'ascidies. Quatre espèces nouvelles sont décrites. La répartition des autres espèces est commentée. Cette faune antarctique est comparée à des données précédentes provenant de la Péninsule Antarctique, de la mer de Ross et de régions subantarctiques. Les affinités avec la faune profonde sont envisagées. C. MONNIOT and F. MONNIOT, CNRS D 0699, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés marins et Malacologie, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 55, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. INTRODUCTION The Antarctic continent is indented by two large seas, the Ross and Weddell Seas, which both allow collections beyond the 70th parallel. For ascidians, the Ross Sea is the best known with 36 species recorded at depths less than 1000 m (MONNIOT and MONNIOT, 1983). In addition, there are three bathyal or abyssal species : Culeolus antarcticus, Bathyoncus mirabilis, and Pyura squamata. In contrast, only eleven shallow species and one abyssal species (Boltenia pilosa) have been recorded in the Weddell Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Natural Products from Tunicates and Their Associated Microbes
    marine drugs Review Marine Natural Products from Tunicates and Their Associated Microbes Chatragadda Ramesh 1,2,*, Bhushan Rao Tulasi 3, Mohanraju Raju 2, Narsinh Thakur 4 and Laurent Dufossé 5,* 1 Biological Oceanography Division (BOD), CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (CSIR-NIO), Dona Paula 403004, India 2 Department of Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry Central University, Brookshabad Campus, Port Blair 744102, India; [email protected] 3 Zoology Division, Sri Gurajada Appa Rao Government Degree College, Yellamanchili 531055, India; [email protected] 4 Chemical Oceanography Division (COD), CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (CSIR-NIO), Dona Paula 403004, India; [email protected] 5 Laboratoire de Chimie et Biotechnologie des Produits Naturels (CHEMBIOPRO), Université de La Réunion, ESIROI Agroalimentaire, 15 Avenue René Cassin, CS 92003, CEDEX 9, F-97744 Saint-Denis, Ile de La Réunion, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (L.D.); Tel.: +91-(0)-832-2450636 (C.R.); +33-668-731-906 (L.D.) Abstract: Marine tunicates are identified as a potential source of marine natural products (MNPs), demonstrating a wide range of biological properties, like antimicrobial and anticancer activities. The symbiotic relationship between tunicates and specific microbial groups has revealed the acquisi- tion of microbial compounds by tunicates for defensive purpose. For instance, yellow pigmented compounds, “tambjamines”, produced by the tunicate, Sigillina signifera (Sluiter, 1909), primarily Citation: Ramesh, C.; Tulasi, B.R.; originated from their bacterial symbionts, which are involved in their chemical defense function, indi- Raju, M.; Thakur, N.; Dufossé, L. cating the ecological role of symbiotic microbial association with tunicates. This review has garnered Marine Natural Products from comprehensive literature on MNPs produced by tunicates and their symbiotic microbionts.
    [Show full text]