Afterword: the Search for "Maurice Bishop" 0)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Afterword: the Search for • i( 947_ _ &Lc c_ eic CTeor 41 Afterword: the search for "Maurice Bishop" 0) David Phillips, the former CIA officer considered by Post be net him only once. He told the Committee the Select Committee on Assassinations as a possible that he encountered "Bishop" between 1960 and 1964. candidate for the true identity behind the cover name In his Post interview, he said it was probably after "Maurice Bishop" -(2)- reacted strongly when this 1964 - after the time most relevant to the Veciana book was published in the suamer of 1980. He con- allegations. "B.H." told the Committee he worked tacted top executives in newspapers and television, closely with Phillips between 1960 and 1964. In the making himself available to counter passages in Con- conversation with the Post, he claimed that he did- spiracy concerning him. As a result, I took parEirt not work with Phillips until after 1964. "3.H." acc- discussions with Phillips on prominent television ounts for these differences by claiming that his dam programs. ents were "wrongly recorded". In the course of these approaches to the press, The Assassinations Committee investigator of the Phillips contacted the editor of the Washington Post. "Bishop" case suspects that the "B.H." scenario may Subsequently, when a reporter -(3)- was assigned to be a red herring, designed to confuse the trail. the story, Phillips revealed the real identity of Such justifiable suspicions might have been resolved former CIA officers whose identities were protected had the Committee management given the "Bishop" case by pseudonyms in Assassinations Committee reports and the attention it deserved. Sadly it did not. While in my book. Phillips observed that "Cross", the case Phillips did testify, the Committee failed to take . officer who believed Phillips had indeed used the testimony on oath from "Cross", "B.H." or "Gupton". name "Bishop", was a heavy drinker, implying that he "Cross" who told two investigators he believed "Bish- was prone to getting his facts wrong. -(4)- Short- op" was Phillips, was not even subjected to formal ly afterwards, when a Post reporter visited "Cross" interview. There were no systematic interrogations at home, he found that Phillips had been on the phone of relevant CIA officers who might have further con- to him only a short time earlier. Whatever had pass- firmed the use of the name "Bishop". The Committee ed between them, "Cross" stood by his assertion that failed to follow up a key lead provided by Veciana - the name "Bishop" had been used in the Miami CIA off- the identity of a prominent Cuban who may have orig- ice, and that he believed it was used to refer to inally proposed Veciana to "Bishop" as a promising Phillips. candidate for CIA recruitment. -(1)- The Cuban's name was known to the Committee, and is known to the "Cross" admits that he was formerly a heavy author. Other leads received cursory treatment. drinker, but - as noted earlier - has shown that his recall of names and details other than "Bishop" is The Caanittee never tried to trace a vital wit- accurate. In a further conversation, with this auth- ness whose name was provided by Veciana months before or, in 1981, "Cross" seemed upset by the interest his the Committee wound up its inquiry. ,Veciana had spok statements have caused, and complained the Assassin- en, from the start, of a go-between whom he had used ations Committee gave it "undue emphasis". He agreed, during his association with "Bishop" however, that he has been correctly quoted. A sub- The person who helped arrange meetings between sequent_ check with congressional investigators re- "Bishop" and Veciana is a woman, a prim grandmother vealed that "Cross" originally linked the name "Bish- in her fifties, who works as a minor functionary in op" with that of Phillips promptly and spontaneously. a U.S. government administrative department. She has The Washington Post reporter was also able to requested anonymity, and will be identified here only talk to Phillips' former Miami assistant "Doug Cupton". as "Fabiola", a Cuban exile who left Havana in autumn -(5) - He said, much as he had said to the Committ- 1961. She worked, until that year, as Veciana's sec- ee "I never used the name "Bishop" to my recollect- retary at the Banco Financiero, and was there at the ion". Finally the reporter visited "B.H." -(6) - time Veciana claims he was recruited by a "Bishop". the former CIA covert operative who told the Committ- While she says Veciana never mentioned a CIA contact, ee he had net "Bishop" in the past, but whose testi- Fabiola recalls details which fit his story. She re- mony prompted a skeptical reaction from the Committee calls a time when Veciana started going to "language investigator. courses" in the evenings. Veciana, in his earliest interviews, spoke of attending nightly US intelligence "B.H." a short, dark man of Cuban origin, is bell- briefings in an office building which houses, on the igerent - not least about the way the CIA has been first floor, the Berlitz School of Language.. -(8)- treated in recent years. He told the Committee. that Fabiola says she did become aware that Veciana Phillips was a "personal friend", an officer he work- was involved in subversive activities. He once pro- with closely on a "day-to-day" basis on Cuban operat- duced a huge sun of half a million dollars, which he ions between 1960 and 1964. Interviewed by the Wash- asked her to safeguard until he retrieved it. Vec- ington Post in 1980, B.H. stated that after Phillips Lana has always said he worked with "Bishop" on a testified to the Committee, but before he himself was "program that resulted in the destabilisation of the formally interviewed, he discussed the Committee in- • Cuban currency' . In Cuba, Fabiola decided not to ask quiry with Phillips. In his Committee interview "B.H.' awkward questions. Politically, she sympathized with was asked simply whether he had known anybody named him, and later - in exile - collaborated actively Maurice Bishop. After replying that he had, "B.H." when Veciana became leader of Alpha 66. - (9) - responded to Committee questioning. "Mr Bishop was in He asked her to act as an answering service for the organisation but I had no personal day-to-day op- him when he was traveling, and in the months to come en relationship with him. Phillips, yes; Bishop, no. Fabiola became familiar with the name of a caller I knew them both." from the mainland United States. The name was "Bish- "B.H." appeared in his replies to be stressing op". When I interviewed Fabiola I threw out a num- that he remembered "Bishop" as being somebody other ber of names, including that of "Bishop". "Bishop" than Phillips. There are notable discrepancies be- was the only name to which she responded, and it . tween what "B.H." told the Casnittee and what he stirred in her the memory of another name. "Bishop' raid to the Post. He told the Committee he encoun- is firmly linked in Fabiola's mind with a second per- tered "Bishop" "two or three times". He told the -10- son - "Prewett". For her, the two names are so def- sonally know him," and later, in response to a dir- initely associated that at first she had difficulty ect question, she said she did not know "Bishop." remembering which was which. Febiola says both in- Prewett also said she had never net Phillips. dividuals telephoned over the same period, and she Phillips - asked about Prewett - contradicts her. understood they were associated with one another. He says he once knew Prewett quite well, specifically She believed both "Bishop" and "Prewett" were conn- recalling meetings in the Dominican Republic. ected with an American news publication, based on Contacted by this author in early 1981, Phillips the East Coast. Finally she recalls that "Prewett" was asked whether he stood by his denial that he was was female. "Maurice Bishop", or indeed knew a "Bishop", a denial A check of American press directories turned up formally recorded in the Assassinations Committee Re- Virginia Prewett - (10) - a Washington journalist port. -(11)- Phillips repeated that he neither was who has specialized in Latin American affairs all her "Bishop", nor."connected in any way", and said that life. She has written extensively about the struggle any such intimation was "an outrageous accusation." between Fidel Castro , whom she characterized as a As for Veciana, the source of the "Bishop" allegati- "betrayer", and the Cuban exiles, whom she describes ion, he also repeated to this author that "Bishop" as "patriots". In sumer 1963 Prewett attended a con- was not Phillips. ference on Cuba co-sponsored by Freedom House and the Citizen's Committee for a Free Cuba. Her report on the conference, later inserted in the Congressional (1) 'Afterword' is taken from the American paper- Record, began by quoting a call by Freedom House "to back edition of Anthony Summers' Conspiracy (1980) remove both Fidel Castro and the Soviet presence It wasn't included in the British (Fontana) edition. from Cuba without delay." When Sweets finished the book he continued to follow For many years Prewett wrote for the North Amer- up certain leads, particularly those connected with ican Newspaper Alliance (MAMA), a syndication organ- "Maurice Bishop" and Oswald in Mexico City. ization founded by Prewett'a friend Ernest ameo, al- This new information was to appear in a series of so a veteran of the CIA's forerunner, the Office of articles , "The conspiracy that nearly led to holo- Strategic Services, who arranged for Prewett to work caust" for The Observer.
Recommended publications
  • Perspectives on the Grenada Revolution, 1979-1983
    Perspectives on the Grenada Revolution, 1979-1983 Perspectives on the Grenada Revolution, 1979-1983 Edited by Nicole Phillip-Dowe and John Angus Martin Perspectives on the Grenada Revolution, 1979-1983 Edited by Nicole Phillip-Dowe and John Angus Martin This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by Nicole Phillip-Dowe, John Angus Martin and contributors Book cover design by Hugh Whyte All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-5178-7 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-5178-7 CONTENTS Illustrations ................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... ix Abbreviations .............................................................................................. x Introduction ................................................................................................ xi Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Citizens and Comrades in Arms: The Congruence of Fédon’s Rebellion and the Grenada
    [Show full text]
  • Grenada's New Jewel Movement
    INTERNATIONAL Lessons of losing power Grenada's New Jewel Movement In October 1983 a US force of 80 000 marines invaded the Caribbean island of Grenada bringing to an abrupt end the five year revolutionary experiment of the New Jewel Movement (NJM) led by Maurice Bishop. Although condemned by anti-imperialist and progressive forces world-wide, the American invasion was apparently welcomed by wide sections of the Grenadan population. DIDACUS JULES, Deputy Secretary for Education in the Provisional Revolutionary Government (PRG) of Grenada, 1979-83, spoke to Barbara Creecy* about the lessons of losing power in Grenada. _ For 25 years prior to 1979, l/T .Yr|Vl|YriYitV^[V questioning who were the ::::;:::::::;::; ••:::;:::::>;::;::: Grenada was governed by li.. ..•;;; black faces in office and Eric Gairy who assumed whether they were serving leadership of the 1951 revol­ the interests of the black •jT\ d£»i_ ution when the masses rose North masses. against the bad working con­ ^ America There were a number of in­ ditions they faced. Although dependent community-based he was initially popularly Grenada militant youth organisations. elected, Gairy degenerated One such was the Movement into a despot using re­ ^t for the Assemblies of the pression and superstition to People which had a black- remain in power. Caribbean &-} power-cum-socialist In the early 1970s, the Ca­ orientation, partly influenced ribbean, influenced by the by Tanzania's Ujamaa social­ upheavals in the United States, ism. There was also an organ­ was swept by a wave of Black South isation called the JEWEL Power. To many young Carib­ America I/" (Joint Movement for Educa­ bean intellectuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Most Urgent Attention to This Action Is Appreciated
    FOR THE URGENT ATTENTION OF UA COORDINATORS AND CAMPAIGN COORDINATORS IN SECTIONS: YOUR MOST URGENT ATTENTION TO THIS ACTION IS APPRECIATED. (UA Coordinators/Home Government Lobbyists/EC contact persons in Australia, Canada (ES), FRG, Netherlands, UK, US sections please note that this UA replaces TLX 46/91 dated 16 July 1991 and subsequent follow-ups dated 26 & 29 July 1991. These sections are also encouraged to take immediate action as outlined below). EXTERNAL (for general distribution) AI Index: AMR 32/01/91 Distr: UA/SC UA 265/91 Death Penalty 1 August 1991 GRENADA: Callistus BERNARD Bernard COARD Leon CORNWALL Lester REDHEAD Ewart LAYNE Amnesty International received reports that the above five prisoners were scheduled to be executed earlier this week. The five are among fourteen former members of the People's Revolutionary Government (PRG) sentenced to death in 1986 for the murder of Prime Minister Maurice Bishop and others in 1983. Appeals in the case of all fourteen were dismissed on 10 July 1991. It has since been reported that temporary stays of execution have been granted in the above cases, pending the hearing of a last-minute motion filed by the prisoners' lawyers. The motion is due to be heard by the Grenada Court of Appeal on 7 August 1991, and it seeks a further stay of execution on a number of grounds. However, if the motion is unsuccessful, executions could still be scheduled after that date. It is feared that the government may wish to execute the above prisoners before returning Grenada to the East Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC) system which would restore the right of appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in London (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic & Political Notes by John Neagle Category/Department: General Published: Tuesday, October 27, 1987
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiSur Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 10-27-1987 Grenada Four Years After U.S. Invasion: Economic & Political Notes John Neagle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur Recommended Citation Neagle, John. "Grenada Four Years After U.S. Invasion: Economic & Political Notes." (1987). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ notisur/1044 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiSur by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 075909 ISSN: 1060-4189 Grenada Four Years After U.S. Invasion: Economic & Political Notes by John Neagle Category/Department: General Published: Tuesday, October 27, 1987 Sunday, Oct. 25, marked the fourth anniversary of the US invasion of Grenada. According to NEW YORK TIMES reporter, Joseph Treaster (10/25/87), time, money and advice from the US and other nations have "begun to heal the wounds." Meanwhile, no one has forgotten the execution of popular leftist prime minister Maurice Bishop by his own troops, and the fear of more violence, from within and without. Grenada, with a population of about 92,000, is a conservative and mainly Christian country. Most people acknowledge they had a love affair with Bishop, but they say they never subscribed to his government's marxism. And they say they doubt Bishop himself was a marxist. Some Grenadians say they yearn for the excitement of the Bishop rallies and the national pride they felt when he spoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewarticle the Coards and the Grenada Revolution
    New West Indian Guide 94 (2020) 293–299 nwig brill.com/nwig Review Article ∵ The Coards and the Grenada Revolution Jay R. Mandle Department of Economics, Colgate University, Hamilton NY, USA [email protected] Joan D. Mandle Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Colgate University, Hamilton NY, USA [email protected] Bernard Coard, The Grenada Revolution: What Really Happened? The Grenada Revolution Volume 1. Kingston and St. George’s: McDermott Publishing, 2017. xx + 349 pp. (Paper US$18.50) Bernard Coard, Forward Ever: Journey to a New Grenada. The Grenada Revolu- tion Volume 2. Kingston and St. George’s: McDermott Publishing, 2018. vii + 386 pp. (Paper US$19.50) Bernard Coard, Skyred: A Tale of Two Revolutions. The Grenada Revolution Vol- ume 3. Kingston and St. George’s: McDermott Publishing, 2020. xx + 388 pp. (Paper US$19.50) Phyllis Coard, Unchained: A Caribbean Woman’s Journey Through Invasion, Incarceration & Liberation. Kingston and St. George’s: McDermott Publishing, 2019. viii + 292. (Paper US$14.50) Each of these volumes supplies the kind of detailed information concerning the Grenada Revolution that only its participants could have provided. As such, © jay r. mandle and joan d. mandle, 2020 | doi:10.1163/22134360-09403001 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCDownloaded4.0 license. from Brill.com09/27/2021 01:36:25PM via free access 294 review article the books are invaluable for anyone interested in the Revolution’s many accom- plishments or its tragic demise.1 In Skyred: A Tale of Two Revolutions, Bernard Coard (hereafter BC) details Eric Gairy’s ascendency, as well as the growth in opposition to his rule that culminated with the military victory of the New Jewel Movement (NJM) on March 13, 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Grenada As Looking Glass: Playing the “Russian Game” in the Americas
    CHRISTIANITY & CRISIS, Vol. 44, No. 7 (30 April 1984), 154-160 Grenada as looking glass: Playing the “Russian game” in the Americas By Andrew Reding “LOOKING BACK on Grenada,” James Finn has suggested (C&C, April 2), is a useful exercise. It is indeed—but not, as Finn would have it, so that those who criticized the U.S. invasion of last October can now be led to confess their error. Rather because the invasion was a revealing symbol of a fundamental misdirection in U.S. foreign policy— how far it departs from our national ideals, how fundamentally it distorts the relationship between elected leaders and the citizenry, how dangerous it is to this nation and the world. Grenada is a problem not because U.S. actions there were unjustly criticized but rather because the lessons of the event may be neglected or forgotten. If that happens, it will not be for the first time. To understand Grenada it will be helpful to look even further back, because the 1983 invasion is in many disturbing ways reminiscent of this country’s conquest of the Philippines at the turn of the century. Both actions were justified on grounds that appeared to be expressions of basic American tenets. It was said that we were taking action to rescue peoples who were being hopelessly brutalized by governments imposed upon them by outside forces—Spain in the case of the Philippines, Cuba and the Soviet Union in the case of Grenada. In both instances assurances were given at the outset that we were seeking no selfish gains for ourselves, but only to extend to others the blessings of freedom and democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Requiem for Revolution: Perspectives in the U.S
    Contributions in Black Studies A Journal of African and Afro-American Studies Volume 7 Article 2 January 1985 Requiem for Revolution: Perspectives in the U.S. / OECS Intervention in Grenada William Eric Perkins Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cibs Recommended Citation Perkins, William Eric (1985) "Requiem for Revolution: Perspectives in the U.S. / OECS Intervention in Grenada," Contributions in Black Studies: Vol. 7 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cibs/vol7/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Afro-American Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Contributions in Black Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Perkins: Requiem for Revolution William Eric Perkins REQUIEM FOR A REVOLUTION: PERSPECTIVES ON THE U.S.jOECS* INTERVENTION IN GRENADA T HE GRENADIAN REVOLUTION of March 13, 1979 offended the West Indian ad- herence to Westminster democracy·· and directly challenged U.S. hegem­ ony in its major sphere of influence.· .. The People's Revolutionary Govern­ ment (PRG) led by the vanguard New Jewel Movement overthrew one of the most corrupt, incompetent, and idiosyncratic regimes in the Western hemi­ sphere. The immediate response of the United States was one of cautious approval. As Reagan's Ambassador to the Eastern Caribbean, Sally Shelton, remarked, It is unfortunate that his (Gairy's) removal was by extra-eonstitutional means but let's face it-that was probably the only way he would have *The Organization of Eastern Caribbean States-ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons of Grenada Feb 1986.P65
    United States Department of State February 1986 Lessons of Grenada _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Coverphoto: October 23,1983, Grenadian citizens greet U.S. Marines from the streets of Grenville. For additional copies, contact: The Office of Public Diplomacy for Latin America and the Caribbean S/LPD Room 6253 Department of State Washington, D.C. 20520 _____________________________________________________________________________ For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Contents Summary 1 Deliberate Deception 4 Soviet-Cuban-Nicaraguan Connection 6 The War against Religion 14 The Subversion of Democratic Socialism 16 Life under the New JEWEL Movement 21 Notes 23 Summary Until the discovery of the Grenada Documents in October to influence world opinion. Until the release of the Grenada 1983, some people in the United States still harbored the Documents, they largely succeeded in convincing many in myth that the New JEWEL* Movement (NJM) and the the United States that they were reformers working for a government of Maurice Bishop in Grenada were nationalist more just society. reformers of a social democratic bent who were pushed into the arms of the Soviet Union and Cuba by inept United In their dealings with the Soviets and Cubans, on the States diplomacy. A review of the documents created by the other hand, the NJM leaders constantly sought to prove that Bishop government quickly dispels that myth. The docu- they were good Communists, useful as a launching pad for ments show that the NJM leaders knew from the beginning spreading subversion to neighboring countries, and useful which ideological direction they were pursuing and care- allies in international fora.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Workshop Report
    Caribbean Emergency Legislation Project National Workshop Flamboyant Hotel and Villas Bougainvillea Conference Room St. George’s, Grenada March 22, 2010 9:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. DRAFT Workshop Report Introduction In the context of the Caribbean Emergency Legislation Project (CELP), the Department of Sustainable Development conducted the first of two national workshops in Grenada. The objective of the workshop was to share project findings and experiences at the national level regarding disaster and emergency management. Moreover, the workshop aimed at establishing a dialogue on best practices that would be applicable to the disaster legislation in Grenada and the Caribbean. Opening remarks and General overview of the workshop Mr. Terence Craig, OAS Representative, welcomed the workshop’s participants and briefly highlighted OAS initiatives in the area of disaster management. Following Mr. Craig, Mr. Timothy N.J. Antoine, Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Finance, Planning, Economy, Energy and Cooperatives, provided the main opening remarks. Mr. Antoine pointed out the importance of convening the workshop, and went on to mention the region’s dependency on tourism and its vulnerability to natural disaster. He noted that it was necessary to minimize vulnerability and increase resilience. Mr. Antoine emphasized that national development demands a comprehensive approach to disaster management, which Page 1 of 39 could be furthered by such joint initiatives as those taken by conducting Workshop. Moreover, he pointed to immediate concerns such as the fact that Grenada was experiencing a drought, and that proper preparation was required for the 2010 hurricane season. Mr. Antoine also shared some lessons learnt regarding the management of national disasters from other nations such as Chile and Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • View Profile
    Grenada when the trade winds prevail. The rainy Most of the population is of African (82 per season runs from June–December, when cent in 1991 census) or mixed hurricanes may occur and in some years – for African/European descent (13 per cent). The example, Hurricane Ivan in 2004 – cause remainder is made up of small European and extensive damage. The temperature and Asian groups. rainfall vary with altitude, with much heavier Language: English is spoken by almost rainfall in the mountains. everyone. A French-based Creole is also Vegetation: The natural vegetation is spoken. tropical rainforest (about 75 per cent of Religion: According to the most recent surviving natural forest is state-owned) and census available (2001) the population is brushwood. Species include the gommier, made up of mainly Christians (Roman bois canot and blue mahoe. There are also Catholics 45 per cent, Anglicans 14 per cent, mangrove swamps and stunted woods. Seventh Day Adventists, Methodists). Forest covers 50 per cent of the land area Health: Public spending on health was three and there was no significant loss of forest per cent of GDP in 2012. There are three cover during 1990–2012. hospitals: General Hospital (St George’s), Wildlife: Mainly smaller species, such as the Princess Alice Hospital (St Andrew’s) and mona monkey, agouti, armadillo and Princess Royal Hospital (Carriacou). There are mongoose. There is a large variety of birds; homes for handicapped children and geriatric KEY FACTS the Grenada dove and hookbilled kite (an patients. Health centres and district medical endangered species) are unique to the island.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grenada Revolution in the Caribbean Present NEW CARIBBEAN STUDIES Edited by Kofi Campbell and Shalini Puri
    The Grenada Revolution in the Caribbean Present NEW CARIBBEAN STUDIES Edited by Kofi Campbell and Shalini Puri New Caribbean Studies is a unique series of monographs and essay collections focused on the still burgeoning field of Caribbean Studies, a field that is contributing to Caribbean self-understanding, global understanding of the region, and the reinven- tion of various disciplines and their methodologies well beyond the Caribbean. The series especially solicits humanities-informed and interdisciplinary scholarship that addresses any of the region’s language traditions. Kofi Campbell is an associate professor of English at Wilfrid Laurier University and coordinator of the English program at its Brantford Campus. He is the author of Literature and Culture in the Black Atlantic: From Pre- to Postcolonial. Shalini Puri is an associate professor of English at the University of Pittsburgh. Her book The Caribbean Postcolonial: Social Equality, Post-Nationalism, and Cultural Hybridity was the winner of the 2005 Gordon and Sybil Lewis award for the best book on the Caribbean. Published by Palgrave Macmillan: Humor in the Caribbean Literary Canon By Sam Vásquez Rhys Matters: New Critical Perspectives Edited by Mary Wilson and Kerry L. Johnson Between Empires: Martí, Rizal, and the Intercolonial Alliance By Koichi Hagimoto Desire between Women in Caribbean Literature By Keja L. Valens The Queer Caribbean Speaks: Interviews with Writers, Artists, and Activists By Kofi Omoniyi Sylvanus Campbell Telling West Indian Lives: Life Narrative and the Reform of Plantation Slavery Cultures 1804–1834 By Sue Thomas Coloniality of Diasporas: Rethinking Intracolonial Migrations in a Pan-Caribbean Context By Yolanda Martínez-San Miguel The Grenada Revolution in the Caribbean Present: Operation Urgent Memory By Shalini Puri The Grenada Revolution in the Caribbean Present Operation Urgent Memory Shalini Puri the grenada revolution in the caribbean present Copyright © Shalini Puri, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Maurice Bishop’S Speeches, 1979-I983 : a Memorial Volume
    (l()NIIMl'()lH\lJV Hl‘»l()HY NOBODY S BACKYARD Muurico Bishop's Spee<:lu~r. 1‘)/‘) 1983 A l\/lOfT\Ofl(1l Volume l\/1/\lll\’l( ll lllf>ll( )l’ llt Nnhmly'ri Htltiltyilltl l'- .1 lllI"lt|t>ll.ll \tlllllllI‘ ill '.|><‘1-1 ll-~n In, ll!" l.ll" lllllllt‘ l\/lnnult-i (ll l|ll‘lI.ltl.l -llltl l1‘.I<lt‘l 1-l lln-1.1--ii.nl.i ll1"\iillllll1ll l\/l.ll|I|t 1' lll'.lni|i l'l|ll|ln] |i.|tl|t lll.|l '.lt|-'.x Itll lllI' '.|n'I‘I llI"- til ll|~' l.l‘.I l\/Vllflllllill yt'.||'.til lll‘,llll', llll‘»l1llll|lll'll4‘l|'.l\4‘ I lllll'l lltlll |‘r.| llllllllt‘ l()ll1l‘ltllll1..lllll‘»|llltll|till-lllll-|ll.ll\“.l'. lllV\lll(ll lllt>lllt‘l lll‘-ll l'1|\,/‘I l‘Xl)ll"v‘»|()ll l\/ltlllllllt,‘ lliulniii ~. ‘-lllllllll .int 1- 11111". l.n lH'\llllll 1 ilI‘ll.|tl.l -lllll lll‘- ltlt'.|‘. lll lll1?(,t)lll1).lll\/(ll other lll|ltlV\/tlllll lll.lll‘,'l'.l|l~1‘/\lli*l|rlI{ t .ilii.il {l1l(ll\/l()l1<llt|l1t' V\/Ill ll\/1' (lll lriiit; .|l1t-| hi-. lll‘.llll llllll l‘|lll‘ll t|l\/\/<l\'- l()(’(/l/(‘t){(', lie§.|>t~.'|l\:. not llllll In (il1‘ll.|tll.lll‘-tllltl \N~--.I |iirli.ni-., lllll tn all black <'lll(lW()ll<lll1] l)t'(l[llt‘-llltl lln'rititiii~-.'.t-il (ll lln' lhinl Wllllll By turns illlillylltiill, moving], .'iinii:;int;, his lllllll\lllt_] i.in<_;t".
    [Show full text]