A CITY COMPILATION
UA MAGAZINE 16 - 28 www.ruaf.org Traditional food specialties in Riga. Photo: Didzis Grodzs Contents: and organic markets in Lima 10198 Using Innovations Treated in DomesticProducer-Market Wastewater Link forages: Urban Urban Agriculture field schools and Addis Abeba 3 Solid Waste Recycling in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Making a business of waste management London Green Areas; The case of Lima 6 Innovative livestock-keeping in Ethiopian cities building resilient neighbourhoods in London Amman 104 The Role of Urban Agriculture in Building Resilient Cities: Examples of 8 Developing Value Chains in Amman, Jordan 107 TheMelbourne Elephant and the Castle; towards a London Edible Landscape Amsterdam 109 Adapting to Climate Change and Building Urban Resilience in Australia
11 Athens Municipal Policy Influencing: Experiences of Gardeners in Amsterdam Mexico City
114 Energy Balance in a Suburban Chinampa Agroecosystem in the 13 UrbanBangk Agriculturok e Springs Up in Greece 112 The Role of Urban Agriculture in Waste Management in Mexico City 17 Coping with Flooding in Bangkok Nairobi Southeast of Mexico City Beijing 117 Creating Market Opportunities for Poor Women Farmers in Kenya 23 Different types of Agricultural Cooperatives with Periurban 120115 Community-BasedOrganising Urban F Urarmers’ban Agriculture Groups in inthe Two City East of Nair Africanobi and Capitals Environs 20 Farmers The Beijing in China:Urban twAgriculturo cases e Policy Guidelines: A milestone 26 Emerging Migrant Farmer Communities in Periurban Beijing 126 Low-tech Innovations in Vertical Farming: Nairobi, Kenya 123 A Garden in a Sack: Experiences in Kibera, Nairobi 30 Adapting to water scarcity: improving water sources and use in New Orleans 28 urban Innovations agricultur in Greeenhouse in Beijing Rainwater Harvesting System in Beijing 130 An Update from New Orleans 129 A Report from New Orleans: Growing Food in a recovering city 33 ResilientBelo Horizonte Chinese Cities: Examples from Beijing and Shanghai New York City
York City 35 The Productive Garden: An experience in the city of Belo Horizonte 133 137 Innov Urbanations Agricultur in Urbane as GrAgricultureeen Infrastructure: and their TheImpacts: Case Aof Study New Tour to 38 Creating the Urban Agriculture Forum in Belo Horizonte: a the USA multi-stakeholderBerlin experience Paris 140 Community Supported Agriculture: French approaches 42 Bogota Introducing Rooftop Greenhouses to the City of Berlin 143 A Comparison of Urban Agriculture and Short Food Chains in Paris and Tunis in Bogotá, Colombia 4845 Technologies Promoting a City for thewithout Production Hunger of and Edible Indiff Plantserence: in Bogota,urban agricultur Colombiae Quito 51 Commercial Substrates for Urban Agriculture in Bogota 147 Building the Resilience of Vulnerable Communities in Quito: Adapting local food systems to climate change Cairo 149 Promoting Value Chains in Urban Agriculture for Local Development 53 Urban and Periurban Agriculture Producers’ Organisations in Cairo in Quito
Cape Town Rome 55 Concrete Actions: Cape Town’s Urban Agriculture Assistance 151 Community Supported Urban Agriculture: The Orti Solidali Programme project in Rome
Rotterdam 58 The Siyazama Community Allotment Garden Association, Cape Town 61 Chicago Vegetable Box Scheme in Cape Town, South Africa Approach in Practice 65 Municipal and Civil Society Food Systems Policy Development 157154 Rott FarmerZwam, City and Edible Hortus Mushrooms Aquarius: A from Modular Rotterdam and Synergetic Design
68 Urban Agriculture as a Social Justice Change Agent and Shanghai 66 Economic Growing Home Engine and the Emergence of Urban Agriculture in Chicago 160 Urban Agriculture development in Minhang, Shanghai 71 The Suburban Farm: An innovative model for civic agriculture Toronto Dakar 163 Promoting Urban Agriculture through the Community Food Centre 73 Alliances Between Farmers and Other Actors in Dakar Model 76 Micro-gardens in Dakar 166 Carrot City: Designing for urban agriculture 168 FEEDing the City: Approaches to the Upscaling of Urban Agriculture in Hanoi Almere, Toronto, Lima and Milan
80 Assessing Patterns of Nitrogen Managament in Periurban Agriculture Danforth, Toronto 78 Closing the Phosphorus Loop in Hanoi, Vietnam 171 Growing a Healthy Community: the Green Roof at Access Point on 82 The Role of Farmer Organisations in Marketing Periurban ‘Safe Vancouver ofVegetables’ Hanoi, Vietnam in Vietnam 174 Creating and Implementing Food Policies in Vancouver, Canada 177 Beyond Food Security: Urban Agriculture as a form of resilience in Istanbul Vancouver, Canada 85 The Development of a Women Producers’ Cooperative in Istanbul
Lima
from Lima, Peru 87 92 Agricultural Integration of Business Urban Agricultur Associationse in inMunicipal Urban and Agendas: Periurban Experiences Areas
Responsibility 94 Urban Agricultural Experiences from the Perspective of Social
96 From Eradication to Innovation: Towards healthy, profitable pig raising Solid Waste Recycling in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Making a business of waste management IBH
The major partners in this Solid Waste Management (Bio Recycling) project are: Bioeconomy Association (BEA) – Non-governmental organisation Addis Ababa City Administration (Clean, Beautifiction and Park Agency) - Governmental organisation Arada Sub City of Addis Ababa - Governmental organisation Birhane Clean and Environment Sanitation Association – Private business organisation. Training crop production using soil mixed with bio compost ORGANIC SOLID WASTE Solid waste management is a major challenge facing the cities in the Organic solid waste is collected from the developing world. The commercial recycling of organic waste into a valuable central fruit and vegetable marketplace organic fertiliser called “Bio-compost” is new in Addis Ababa and it is having in Addis Ababa and from residences and a noticeable impact on improved organic waste management and urban shops located around the market. Tackling agriculture. this waste takes up a considerable part of the municipality’s budget.
ntegrated Biofarm Enterprise quality, sustainable productivity and low The assembly of wastes occurs at two (IBE), a private limited company in levels of waste and environmental loss. levels. The first is at market and house- I Ethiopia, began operations in Addis Since then, IBE has served as a national hold level. The fruit and vegetable whole- Ababa in 1998, based on a philosophy model for waste management, environ- salers and retailers at the market collect of working with nature to achieve high mental restoration, resources manage- wastes in garbage tanks, while waste from ment and food production to benefit residences and shops around the market the surrounding community (Getachew area is collected by a private business Tikubet, 2002). organisation called Birhane Clean and For the past eight years, IBE has also Environment Sanitation Association. A functioned as a training and demonstra- fee is paid for this service to the associa- tion centre. It now also operates field tion. The second level of assembly from stations in different regions of the country the market area to the project area and (Assella, Mekele, Assossa and Gurage), other dumping areas is carried out by which strengthen training and research the municipality. About 40 m3 or 3500 opportunities has involved urban organic kg organic waste is collected from this waste recycling and utilisation in collabo- market area per day. But only 16 m3 or ration with different partners. 1400 kg is used for this project because of Berihun Tefera: Bioeconomy Association The major objectives of this project are capacity problems. The rest needs to be Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. to increase awareness, set up the produc- dumped outside the city by the munici- [email protected] tion of organic fertiliser from solid waste pality. IBE received about 534,000 kg Getachew Tikubet: Integrated Biofarm collected from residential areas and of waste in 2006. Separation of organic Enterprise, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. marketplaces and stimulate its use for wastes from non-organic wastes and [email protected] urban and rural agriculture. sorting are done at both levels of collec-
!?=?G
42 2 *;A;TCH? Table 1. Cost-benefit of IBE u From page 40 Items Revenue/ agriculture projects and encourage local Cost communities to produce and consume In Birr In USD traditional crops. Revenue (from sale of bio-compost) 539,325 63,450 Labour 49,746 5,852 The sharing of experiences and innova- Implements 15,000 1,765 tions between urban and rural farmers is Soil nutrient analysis 4,500 529 important and efficient because rural Packing costs 85,440 10,052 farmers have knowledge that has been Marketing costs 12,000 1,412 generated over many decades. For Salary and administrative costs 48,000 5,647 instance, the Msinga people have devel- Others 12,250 1,441 oped innovative ways to cook, process Opportunity costs 177,200 20,847 and mix indigenous vegetables in order to Assembling at the market 14,400 1,694 preserve them and balance nutrients in Loading 10,800 1,271 their diet (Njokwe, 2006). Rural areas Transport to project area and unloading 144,000 16,941 have more wild varieties of indigenous Others 8,000 941 vegetables than urban areas, which have Total Cost (including opportunity costs) 404,136 47,545 fewer or no wild areas at all. On the other Total Cost (not including opportunity costs) 226,936 26,698 hand, urban farmers have invaluable Profit (including opportunity costs) 135,189 15,905 experience on how to survive on very Profit (not including opportunity costs) 312,389 36,752 scarce resources with limited or no support, and they have access to markets. These and other lessons are being shared The business is financially feasible if the Agriculture is an important part (85%) through the network of rural and urban bio-compost is sold at a price that is not of Ethiopia’s economy and labour force. farmers interacting through the FSG. lower than the break even price of 1.52 But, due to land degradation, agricultural The farmers’ evaluation reports showed Birr (0.18 USD) considering opportunity production has become dependent on that the yield of exotic and indigenous costs and 0.85 Birr (0.10 USD) per kg fertiliser application. As a result, Ethiopia vegetable cultivated in trench and raised without consideration of opportunity imports vast amounts of inorganic ferti- plots is very high. Production costs are costs. Since IBE is a private limited liser. Bio-compost thus has important low compared to the conventional company, any profit earned is reinvested. potential in this country. farming system. Through various experiments conducted References PROMOTION together with farmers and at Ukulinga Getachew Tikubet 2006. The BioFarm: An IBE promotes bio-compost organic Integrated Farming Approach to Restore, Create farm, FSG will further strengthen the fertiliser and urban waste management and Sustain Wealth. In: Resource Management for exposure of urban and rural farmers to Poverty Reduction Approaches and Technologies, recycling in general in the following ways: Assefa, A., Getachew, T. & Johann, B. (eds), Selected innovative techniques Eventually, a - By managing bio-compost marketing Contributions to Ethio-Forum 2002. The Regal market development strategy will be Press Kenya Ltd, Nairobi. centres. adopted to allow the communities to raise - By inviting officials of different govern- income to meet some of their needs. mental and non-governmental organisa- Notes tions to visit the project. IBH 1) In Msunduzi, these institutions include CINDI - Through the media (advertisements) Network, Institute of Natural Resources, Department and publications including brochures, of Health, Department of Social Welfare, Department of Agriculture, the Farmer Support Group (FSG) of the newsletters and posters. University of KwaZulu-Natal, and the School of The municipality also actively promotes Agricultural Science and Agribusiness of the same university. urban agriculture and the use of bio-com- References post. Farmer Support Group, 2004. Promoting Agricultural Innovation in AIDS affected Rural CONCLUSIONS Households. An Action Research in KwaZulu- Natal, South Africa. Progress Report for March Waste management is a big issue in urban Partial view of Biofarm, Assela Branch 2004-December 2004. management, especially in mega cities Njokwe, B.J., 2006. Msinga Indigenous Vegetables that Could Provide People with Most Needed like Addis Ababa. Land is scarce in these Micronutrients to mitigate HIV/AIDS and Food IBH cities and it needs to be used productively Insecurity. A Paper presented at PELUM South Africa Workshop on Food First on 28-29-Sep- and efficiently. Therefore, businesses tember 2006, Ascott Inn, Pietermaritzburg. that recycle organic wastes and produce Njokwe, B.J., and J. McCosh 2005. African Roots: Traditional Foods to address Nutrition in the standardised and packed organic fertilisers Modern World. A Paper Presented to the Urban as described here are vital. They contribute Micro-Farming and HIV/AIDS Workshop, Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa 15-26 to urban waste management but also August 2005 indirectly to the promotion of safe agricul- Van Diepen, I., 2004. “The Impact of HIV/AIDS on Rural Livelihoods of Farmer Households”, An ture in the city by providing organic fertil- ethnographic study in Msinga sub-district. KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa iser to urban farmers in small packs. Tree seedling production using biocompost
!?=?G
As urbanisation increases in Ethiopia, city dwellers are responding in innovative ways to
problems of high unemployment Bayer Wolfang and opportunities of high market demand by growing crops and raising animals. Many people in poor families, especially women and youth, take these initiatives because they already knew farming before they migrated to town, or they learned it from others who were farming in town.
A donkey can earn income through fetching water, flour and other goods
rrigated vegetable farming in Addis Poor urban families that have little to encourage urban dwellers, especially the Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital, is now invest usually start with chickens, which poor and formally unemployed, to raise I partly in the formal sector. Eleven need little space, find their feed almost “fast-return” animals. In some cases, even marketing service cooperatives of urban anywhere and bring quick returns for some technical advice and veterinary farmers produced almost 12,000 tons of immediate needs. A local chicken costs services are provided for urban livestock- vegetables for the city market in 2006 about 25 Ethiopian Birr (roughly 3 USD). keepers. (Addis Ababa City Government 2006). In Families with a bit more money for initial contrast, livestock production is mainly in investment (about 50 USD) buy a donkey, Most of the urban farmers, however, still the informal sector. The forms of which can earn income through fetching have to depend primarily on their own livestock-keeping differ depending on the water, flour and other goods. knowledge and ingenuity. Faced with space and initial capital available. many problems of keeping animals in the Livestock-keepers in the larger towns cities, they have been obliged to find SPECIES FOR SPACES face problems in obtaining feed and innovative ways of obtaining animal feed, Households with more living space keep water for their animals. Another problem water and medicines. dairy cows, sheep, goats, or oxen for is conflicts with neighbours because of fattening, sometimes combined with bees the smell of the animals and the manure. Some urban farmers collect residues and poultry. Poorer households with less Ruminants (cattle, sheep and goats) often from local beer-making, flour-mill dust, space – usually in rented rooms, with have intestinal problems because, to grain residues etc to use as feed. Some several people living in one room – keep supplement their daily rations, they collect grass or tree foliage from woody only one or two sheep or goats, or a scavenge in urban wastes and sometimes areas in and around the town. Others donkey or chickens. eat indigestible plastics. access feed by taking waste from vegetable markets; this also helps to keep INNOVATION BY NECESSITY the marketplaces clean. Hailu Araya, Alemayehu Ayalew, In many large regional towns and cities in Azeb Werqu and Nigusie HaileMariam Ethiopia, e.g. Mekelle in Tigray Region, Only better-off urban dwellers can afford Institute for Sustainable Development, the municipal governments are gaining to give tap water to their animals. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia interest in urban farming. As part of their [email protected] poverty-reduction programmes, they Continued on page 58 u
!?=?G
Most urban farmers of rural origin have traditional knowledge about treating animal diseases, e.g. chopping and mixing local plants to control lice in chickens; or using the flesh of Ire (an Aloe species) to treat bloat in cattle. Some farmers without traditional knowledge use modern (chemical) human medicines such as Ampicillin and Tetracycline as an immediate measure for sick sheep or goats.
People who keep large ruminants (especially cattle) sell the manure for use as fuel or compost, or use it at home to reduce their fuel expenses. Youth groups Yilma Getachew, sharing experiences on vegetable farming in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia collect manure and other urban waste from city streets and compounds and make compost that they either use in It is with great sadness that we announce the loss of Yilma Getachew who passed gardening or sell to other growers of away in 2007. For all those of us who were fortunate enough to have worked with vegetables or flowers. such a dignified and knowledgeable practitioner, there is no questioning the prolific role that Yilma played in the development of urban agriculture, as an activist, RURAL LEARNING FROM URBAN researcher, teacher, innovator and pioneer of the urban field. With over thirty years LIVESTOCK-KEEPERS of work experience as a researcher, lecturer, rural development practitioner and Innovations made by urban people are writer Yilma dedicated his life to food security issues and in particular the develop- showing also rural people new possibili- ment of innovative grass root technologies in both the rural and urban settings. But ties. Grazing by unattended livestock is a his greatest passion was the small food-producing garden. Growing walls, container problem in many parts of rural Ethiopia. gardening, intercropping with legumes, basket composting, manure tea and organic Without extension support, urban waste recycling were some of the technologies that he promoted but always holisti- livestock-keepers have developed systems cally and in one garden or on one plot. Yilma’s greatest challenge was to develop of tethering and cut-and-carry feeding. gardens that could sustain poor families on the smallest possible plot size, using an Government extension agencies use these approach that Yilma referred to as bio-intensive gardening. His own homegarden in urban examples to show farmers living Addis Ababa bore testament to this approach. near towns the importance of controlled A. Adam-Bradford grazing. Also the innovative feedstuffs such as vegetable wastes provide examples to rural farmers.
In some cases, the women’s and youth u From page 56 groups keeping livestock in towns, e.g. in Allen, P. 2004. Together at the table: Sustainability California Press. Addis Ababa and in some municipalities and sustenance in the American agrifood system. Lyson, T. A. 2004. Civic agriculture: Reconnecting in Tigray Region, have been successful in Penn State Press. farm, food, and community. Tufts University Press. DeLind, L. B. 2002. Place, work, and civic agriculture: Munoz, S. S. 2007. For sale: Condo with chicken building up their animal numbers. Some Common fields for cultivation. Agriculture and coop. Wall Street Journal Online. May 18, 2007. youth have accumulated so many animals Human Values 19, (3): 217-224. Norberg-Hodge, H., T. Merrifield, and S. Gorelick. Feagan, Robert. The place of food: Mapping out the 2002. Bringing the food economy home. Kumarian that they want to go back to rural areas to 'local' in local food systems. Progress in Human Press Bloomfield, Conn. have easier access to feed and more space Geography 31, (1) (2007/2/1): 23-42. Plas, Jeanne, and Susan Lewis. 1996. Environmental Feenstra, G. 2002. Creating space for sustainable factors and sense of community in a planned town. for the livestock. This illustrates the cycles food systems: Lessons from the field. Agriculture and American Journal of Community Psychology 24, (1) of innovation and development in urban Human Values 19: 99-106. (02/12): 109-143. Hinrichs C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food Prairie Crossing Holdings Corporation. Prairie farming that can even lead to urban-to- systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural Crossing - A conservation community. in Prairie rural migration. market. Journal of Rural Studies 16, : 295-303. Holdings Corporation. Grayslake, IL, 2007. http:// Kloppenburg, J., J. Hendrickson, and GW Stevenson. www.prairiecrossing.com/pc/site/index.html. 1996. Coming in to the foodshed. Agriculture and Watson, JS. 2006. Preservation of the environment Human Values 13, (3): 33-42. Reference and open space through free market housing incen- Lawson, L. J. 2005. City Bountiful: A century of Urban tives. University of Illinois at Chicago. Addis Ababa City Government. 2006. community gardening in America. University of Agriculture Department Report. Addis Ababa.
58 2 *;A;TCH? Developing Value Chains in 54 Salwa Tohme Tawk Amman, Jordan Ziad Moussa Shadi Hamadeh Diana Abi Saiid
The city of Amman is the capital of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and lies in the northern part of the Kingdom, covering an area of 1700 km2 with an estimated population of 2,200,000 inhabitants. Annual average rainfall is 275 mm. The poverty rate in Amman reached 8.5 percent in 2008 (Directorate of Statistics, 2010); 25 percent of poor reside in the capital and the unemployment rate is 12.7 percent (ibid). In this context urban agriculture can play a crucial role in positively affecting the standard of living of farming families and individuals.
The total planted area in the city of Amman is almost 32 M dounoums* (or 3.2 M ha) representing 18.4 From Seed to Table project percent of total national production, while livestock raising The region selected for the “From Seed to Table” (FStT) project in the city represents 19 percent of total production. Two is an agricultural valley (Iraq el Amir) in Amman, where farm- types of urban crop production can be distinguished: (i) irri- ers are organised in extended families (which form the basis gated agriculture: mainly practiced in the centre of the city for community and tribal relations). The women in these around the old flood path and the artesian wells and springs, families take care of agriculture and daily household duties Wadi El Sir and Al Mqabalain; and (ii) rain-fed agriculture: and seek to earn additional income through a local not-for- practiced in most parts of the city except in the eastern area profit cooperative called the Iraq el Amir Women’s where the larger plots range between 50 and 100 dnms* Association, established in 1993. The men are mostly civil each (whereas the areas available for home gardens range servants or unskilled workers. Women have a strong interest between 200 and 1000 m2 each). The main products produced and daily involvement in agriculture, but because of the type are fruit (about 840,260 ha of fig, grape, pomegranate, stone of funding available to them before the project began they and pome fruits), vegetables (197,776 ha of mainly tomato, had only developed their handicraft skills (weaving, pottery, cucumber, squash, okra and various leafy vegetables), and paper making, ceramics, etc.) and had established a commu- grains (351,452 ha of wheat, barley, chickpeas, and some other nal kitchen and a bed and breakfast facility through the grains). Cucumber, tomato, strawberry, red and yellow sweet cooperative. The members of the cooperative were strug- pepper and different varieties of lettuce are also exported. gling to keep these facilities operational and to find an Livestock production comprises 390,500 head of sheep, income-generating activity that could sustain the coopera- goats and cows (Greater Amman Municipality, 2007). tive in the long run.
*One dounoum (dnm) is 1000 square metres or 1/10 hectare Implementation The project was planned and designed by the project team and a selected group of farmers (both men and women) representing the region. The team was composed of two coordinators and three members of the cooperative; and the group of farmers was composed of 10 women and 20 men. Together this team initiated an urban producer organisa- tion (UPO) and built close relations with farmers in the area through Urban Producers Field Schools (UPFS) and other project activities. For cultural reasons, initially only men registered to partici- pate in the project. Therefore, disaggregated data were collected per task and activity to identify who would attend Women of the cooperative at the wholesale market (Photo: AUB-ESDU) the Field Schools, and who needed to be contacted for the
Urban Agriculture magazine • number 25 • September 2011 www.ruaf.org marketing institutions and the ministry of trade and commerce; - decision-making on money expenditure; - linking with extension service providers, mainly the ministry of agriculture for the provision of training; 55 - linking with institutions that provide (free) training in management and administration; - the organisation of regular meetings to follow-up on advancement of the project and proper implementation
Greenhouses in the Iraq el Amir valley in Amman (Photo: AUB-ESDU) of activities, bookkeeping for main activities and register- ing of data on farmers; meetings etc. Eventually the project reached 72 families from - exploring potential marketing channels (including in the two regions in the valley: Hay el Bassa and Hay el Karyat, and export market) and participation in national fairs and 75 percent of the project’s direct recipients were women. farmers’ markets, as well as promotion of urban agricul- The most significant step in the project was establishment ture at these venues. of an urban producers’ organisation (UPO) as a separate unit (with assigned and independent staff), within the women’s For example, the UPO managed to get a stand free of charge cooperative. This UPO consists of one director, one treasurer, at the Friday market of Amman, and it has received training one secretary, and 42 members, all of whom are women. This on proposal writing and bookkeeping from the Queen Nour unit manages the business, which consists of all operations Foundation. The members of the UPO team have learned related to the production and marketing of one selected type how to stay updated on market prices and how to use this of produce (see box) together with the participating farmers. information both in the planning of production and to This unit manages the business through a team formed of ensure a constant supply to the market. The latter requires the director, the treasurer, the secretary (all women) and 2 good communication with the farmers. They have also women for packaging and 2 others for marketing. This unit acquired a better business-sense and have learned that is responsible for the coordination of related activities, everything has a cost and a return, especially the image and production and marketing, of the selected product (see box) branding of the produce. for the business (42 farmers) and all the participating 72 The team also implemented a project on food security as an families. initiative on healthy food production and healthy meals for The FStT project coordinators initially assisted the UPO in children and teachers at a neighbouring school. making contacts with expert farmers, support institutions During the whole FStT project, men played a limited role, and and with potential buyers and donors. The experience of the only participated in specific activities such as meetings, the women who had already worked in the cooperative was a UPFS, and contacts with potential buyers in some cases. plus because they had already gained managerial skills and There is now a better recognition of the role women can play built trust with a number of institutions and with the fami- in society: not only are they leading a business that men are lies in the region. engaging in, but they are gaining new information and The establishment of a group saving scheme to ensure support for their role in farming, which is an activity normally financial self-sustainability was an important mechanism led by men when practiced beyond the household level. The to enhance the role of the UPO. The terms and conditions participants have also gained more knowledge of credit were discussed with farmers, who agreed on an entrance fee institutions and extension services. of JD 5 to 10 (1 JD=1 Euro), depending on their capacity, and Challenges included difficulty in building immediate trust then a fee of JD 1 each month. They also pay marketing fees between the new UPO and the other urban farmers in the to the cooperative amounting to 14 percent of their gross region, especially since innovative management of agricul- revenue from sales, of which 6 percent goes to the UPO ture was being propagated in an area dominated by tradi- “revolving fund”. This fund is intended to cover accident tional approaches. Also, getting the farmers to respect the insurance, to pay for bad debts, to finance activities to conditions of planting and delivering on time took some improve skills, education and investment opportunities, and to build the fund. The other 8 percent covers marketing costs such as packaging, transportation and commission. Moreover, each farmer deposits 1 percent of their sales in “a reserve account” under his/her name to encourage the habit of saving, and to help control unnecessary consumption.
Results, impacts and challenges Through the FStT project and activities of the UPO, the farm- ers’ and the association’s capacities have been strengthened with respect to management, marketing and networking. Improvements have been noted in: - decision-making on the choice of marketing channels Participating women cleaning the green onions in the field before and contracts, and in building linkages and contacts with packaging (Photo: AUB-ESDU)
Urban Agriculture magazine • number 25 • September 2011 www.ruaf.org Developing Value Chains in Amman, Jordan
export channels). The UPO will continue with more onion cycles and to apply the FStT approach to other crop/animal production chains, such as the production of figs and olives (which grow well in the region), production and drying of selected medicinal and Distribution of onion seedlings trays to farmers (Photo: AUB-ESDU) aromatic plants and processing of goat cheese. A key lesson for the farmers was the necessity to work along effort, especially since these conditions were set by a group the various stages of the value chain rather than focusing on of women. Additionally the buyers were not used to working the production process alone. The UPA continues to create with women, and building trust was not easy initially. Once linkages with other support agencies, and it is applying for the trust was there, the UPO struggled to sustain the image support for the further development of managerial and of the brand and to keep the farmers satisfied with the price organisational skills as well as for funds to sustain its current offered to them compared to that offered by middlemen and activities and develop more value chains approaches. other marketing channels. Management of the revolving fund is still a challenge for the new UPO, especially in dealing with the different expectations of the members, and in Most promising option (MoPO) in Amman- maintaining transparency. Jordan: Fresh green onion Innovations in Amman are: Lessons learned and future perspectives Based on the experiences in Amman, it is clear that efficiency • New variety of spring onions suited to local conditions: could have been better if the programme had started with a does not flower early (early flowering reduces the smaller group of farmers: 20 or 30 farmers instead of the commercial value), long shelf life, larger size, uniform proposed 100. The project could then have started with one produce or two first crop cycles before adding on the next group of 20 • Planting onion seedlings (from nursery) to accelerate to 30 farmers. In this way, the organisational and managerial production and reduce seedling loss skills and the relations and communication skills with farm- ers and the market could have been built gradually, and the • Year round production: three seasons per year for the process could have hence been less hectic and risky, espe- new onion variety (vs. one or at most two for local variety) cially since the newly formed team had no experience in • New harvesting and post-harvesting techniques (dry managing such a large group. the soil before harvesting, first cleaning in the field, sorting at household level, branding and packaging at Furthermore, creating a business plan and cost analysis the cooperative level); were difficult for the UPO, which lacked the necessary knowl- edge to do this and to support the farmers. Adequate risk • Drastic improvement in packaging and marketing: analysis had been done, but no alternatives in the event of 0.5 kg and 1 kg plastic bags ready to market; label indi- failure of the business were in place. Another lesson is that cating “geographic origin” and “healthy produce”, working with more than one type of produce (the most bypassing the middlemen chain through targeted promising option – see box) would allow a broader market marketing, social recognition, etc. approach and give more flexibility to the farmers.
In addition, several of the UPO meetings did not meet the Salwa Tohme Tawk farmers’ expectations since they expected materialistic AUB Amman support rather than theoretical lectures, especially on how Email: [email protected] to get organised. They are used to working more individually. Ziad Moussa, Shadi Hamadeh, and Diana Abi Saiid To improve the effectiveness of the approach in a context like Environment and Sustainable Development Unit, American Amman, we suggest that practical support be provided University of Beirut (ESDU, AUB) before working on organisational strengthening. Despite these challenges, the UPO has developed well, and the farmers have established a large nursery to produce seedlings to be sold to other References farmers at competitive prices. Greater Amman Municipality. 2007. Towards the Promotion of Urban For this purpose, an existing Agriculture in Amman: An Exploratory Study, Environment and and fully equipped greenhouse Sustainable Development Unit of the American University of Beirut, (1000 square metres) has been Lebanon. 85 pages United Nations Development Programme (Amman,Jordan) and the rented for one year. The UPO is Jordanian Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation. 2011. also aiming to link with neigh- Jordan Human Development Report, Jordan Small Businesses and bouring schools to sell fresh Human Development. 185 pages. and nutritious local produce, Directorate of Statistics, Jordan. 2010. Report on Poverty in Jordan as part of efforts to broaden its based on 2008 survey. 99 pages. Responsible production logo Amman (Photo: AUB-ESDU) market channels (and possible
Urban Agriculture magazine • number 25 • September 2011 www.ruaf.org Municipal Policy Influencing: Experiences of Gardeners in Amsterdam
In 2001 the Amsterdam municipality started preparations for a new spatial plan, which became the basis for city planning development in the period 2002-2010. The plan, entitled Joanna Wilbers “Choosing urbanism”, aimed to place residential and economic functions within the city limits, while green areas were to be established on the city fringes. Among other steps, the plan involved sacrificing five allotment garden parks for housing construction and infrastructure developments. It compelled the tenant of the allotment garden parks, the Association of Allotment Gardens (or in Dutch: Bond van Volkstuinders, BvV), to choose an entirely new and different strategy for influencing Allotment garden in Amsterdam policy, of which this article provides an account.
llotment gardens in the with advancing their health and life in which are located outside the city limits Netherlands originated in the general and not so much with increasing due to changed boundaries or because the A second half of the 18th century. the gardeners’ incomes. The first gardens had to be moved from city land Well-to-do citizens established a society Amsterdam garden group was established that was no longer available. The BvV also in 1784 aimed at the intellectual growth in 1910. Nowadays, Amsterdam (the maintains a list of 1,500 aspiring members, of the ‘average’ people, such as workmen. largest city of the Netherlands with 22,000 who are on a waiting list to begin their One of the society’s activities was to ha and 740,000 inhabitants) has 39 allot- own gardens. rent out plots for gardening to labourers ment garden parks (300 ha) on its territory so that they could grow their own food encompassing 6,000 individual gardens. The BvV was established in 1917 as a and increase their family incomes. The land on which the garden parks are non-profit organisation. Per garden park Furthermore, gardening was seen as an located is owned by the municipality. the members choose the representatives activity to stimulate personal and societal Most allotment gardens are no longer for the General Assembly, the highest development. located where they originally started out, authority in the association. This authority while some have disappeared all together chooses the main board. The members The development of allotment gardens due to urban planning and infrastructure also choose park boards to perform the increased rapidly towards the end of the developments. management tasks for each garden park. 19th century when industrialisation took All board activities are performed by over in the Netherlands. The fast growth Twenty-six garden parks have a so-called members who receive a small compensa- of the labour population and the poor accommodation-recreational function, tion for costs made. The organisation has living circumstances were reasons for which means that each garden has a a small office with paid staff who provide many municipalities to rent out garden cottage in which one can stay overnight membership administration and support plots to cultivate potatoes and vegetables. from April through September. There are to the board. The challenge for the BvV four recreational parks where one cannot is to keep its structure and regulations Currently, the Netherlands has around stay overnight. This also applies to the as efficient, simple and cost-effective as 250,000 recreational allotment gardeners, nine food garden parks where gardeners possible for its members. Therefore these half of whom are members of gardeners’ mainly grow vegetables, herbs and fruits. are revised periodically and the results associations. A number of allotment Most parks are on the urban fringe, but of these revisions are incorporated in the gardeners’ associations have united in one park is located in the middle of a association’s policy plans. These plans a national union, the AVVN (Algemeen residential area and is part of a city park. describe the BvV’s activities and strate- Verbond van Volkstuindersverenigingen gies and are formulated by the General Nederland), which represents around Twenty-four of the 39 parks in Amsterdam Assembly. The current plan covers the 25,000 gardeners2). are rented to BvV (5,000 gardens), and the period 1998-20073), and the subsequent remaining 15 are rented to a total of 14 plan now being developed will be in effect AMSTERDAM other associations (1,000 gardens). until 2011. In 1909 the Committee for Allotment Gardens was established in Amsterdam. BVV Besides defending the interests of its The members were primarily concerned The BvV has 6,000 members, which makes members, the BvV’s goal is to acquire land it the largest allotment gardening associa- for the gardens and promote gardening Johan van Schaick tion in the Netherlands. In addition to as a form of active recreation and as a Association of Allotment Gardeners1) (BvV) the parks in Amsterdam, the association way to learn about the environment, [email protected] rents five more parks (1,000 gardens), flora and fauna as well as the cultivation
#? 14 2 *;A;TCH? Urban Agriculture 31 Springs up in Greece Nerea Morán Jose Luis Fernández de Casadevante In recent years, urban agriculture has spread as a response to the low prices offered by intermediaries. remarkably in Greece, considering that there is no This was the most visible event of a movement that is recon- necting farmers and consumers, through direct selling, local historic tradition for this activity. Diverse actors, markets and community food groups. such as community groups, agro-diversity networks In the last years, community and institutional urban agricul- and local governments, are developing projects ture initiatives have arisen in Greek cities, merging food with various aims and organisational patterns. production, urban ecology, food sovereignty, social links and new ways of thinking and inhabiting the cities. Community They are all trying to deal with particular aspects of gardens are part of the social innovations developed by citi- the multidimensional crisis that Greece is facing. zens’ projects involving self-protection, social care (migrants and homeless support, self-managed health centres, Greece has been one of the first European countries suffer- community kitchens, etc.) and alternative sociality (coopera- ing from the present crisis. Financial crisis, bank rescue, tivism, occupied factories, barter networks or time banks), public indebtedness and austerity policies have contributed developing diverse alternatives to build a transition strategy to a situation of urban impoverishment, unemployment from the local level. and cuts in public services (social, health and education). One million people in Greece are unable to pay for their basic As well, municipal programs are addressing social vulnera- diet. The growing difficulty with food access for the most bility, developing social integration and food access strate- vulnerable population (unemployed and retired people) has gies for people in need. In addition, there is the remarkable led to a bigger concern about the agri-food system. The role of Peliti, a network for biodiversity and local seeds, which “potato movement” began in the spring of 2012, when Greek collaborates with most of the urban agriculture projects. farmers started to sell their potatoes directly to consumers Together, these initiatives represent interesting forms of Agios Dimitros allotment garden. Photo: N Morán and JL Fernández Urban Agriculture magazine • number 28 • December 2014 • back to contents page www.ruaf.org social innovation in response to the multiple crises that Examples of Community gardens Greek society is facing and which, increasingly, also is result- ing in new forms of municipal policies to support urban Per.ka, an acronym for “periurban crops”, came to light agriculture and local food systems. 32 in 2011, in order to cultivate an abandoned military site, occupied and transformed into a public park by the people of northern Thessaloniki. The first Per.ka group began to grow food organically. As more interested people arrived, new groups were formed, composed of 30-40 people who take care of part of the site, demarcat- ing individual and common plots, and constructing resting and storing spaces. Presently there are 7 Per.ka groups, which makes about 200 people. This collective project is grounded in cooperation and ecology; they support public land property but also community Table: Allotments and community gardens, evolution 2008 – 2013 management. All of the Per.ka groups join in a fort- Community gardens nightly assembly where common tasks and activities are Community gardens have appeared within a context of decided upon. They also participate in the Movement of social protest movements. The first one, in December 2008, Direct Distribution of Products in Thessaloniki (Anoixto was due to the death of a 15-year-old boy shot by the police, Diktio). in the Athens neighbourhood of Exarchia. This fact set off massive mobilisations throughout the country, and the biggest riots in its recent history (Stavrides, 2010). In Athens Ellenikó Community Garden. The former Athens airport, we can find examples of community gardens from this first located on the southeast coastline of the city, was wave, developed by left-wing militant groups in occupied supposed to become a metropolitan park, but the crisis public spaces and facilities: Navarino Park in Exarchia; stopped this project. A community group conceived an Votanikos Social Centre, located in a closed municipal green- alternative development that could deal with the house; and Agros in Tritsi Park. environmental, economic, educational and social crisis. The Square’s Movement in 2011, in response to the austerity They worked with the university on their proposal, policies, and making visible the political and confidence collected signatures in support of the project, and staged crisis, led to local assemblies that began several projects in a symbolic olive-tree planting on the airport site. The the neighbourhoods. New community gardens appeared, municipality has lent them a 2,500 m2 area contiguous sometimes launched by people directly involved or close to to the airport, where they have begun a community the movement, or simply inspired by a new way of coping garden, diffusion and training activities as well as with big problems. These gardens are created by more diverse and heterogeneous communities, and they have traditional seed-giving, supporting garden projects in greater social support, but are not without conflict with the schools and sharing their products with municipal social local governments. Two projects that illustrate the progress kitchens. of the movement in different cities are Per.ka and Ellenikó Community Garden (see Box 1). Maroussi allotment garden. Photo: N Morán and JL Fernández Urban Agriculture magazine • number 28 • December 2014 • back to contents page www.ruaf.org The emergence of Municipal Garden ing economic relief for households; and “to strengthen the Allotments in Greece in times of crisis community bond and for leisure”, especially at this time of Currently, among the most popular paradigms of Urban crisis when people are also deprived of entertainment and 33 Agriculture in Greece are the Municipal Garden Allotments fun. After the first harvest, during focus-group discussions, (MGAs), which first appeared in 2011–12. The local municipal the growers highlighted conviviality, leisure and enhanc- authorities announced these gardens primarily as social ing community bonds as the most precious functions of policy projects and a means to alleviate some of the problems the garden, as well as re-connecting to their rural past. urban dwellers faced due to the economic crisis and the Obviously, in times of crisis and socioeconomic precarious- collateral lack of public support to vulnerable groups. ness, a sense of social safety is imperative. People have embraced the idea to be given, for free (or a symbolic price), a plot in order to grow their own food and The crucial question facing the municipal allotments is support the daily diet for the whole family. about their sustainability and viability. The analysis of the case studies showed that the MGAs are still more a short- In 2013, during field research in two MGAs in Northern term action of social policy rather than institutional and Greece (Alexandroupolis and Thermi-Raidestos), the long-term sustainable urban planning. In fact, urban agri- motives of the stakeholders were disclosed. The economic culture initiatives face a set of constraints (bureaucracy crisis played an important role in the decision of the delays, land use pressure and conflicts, financing difficulties, municipalities to establish vegetable gardens, given the etc.). Moreover, even if farm land is provided by local alarming phenomena of neo-poverty and malnutrition in authorities, it is used only on a temporary basis due to lack a growing portion of the urban population. At the same of a cadastre and of a proper institutional framework to time, another motivation expressed by local authorities legitimise urban agriculture as a specific land use. These was to cultivate social responsibility and solidarity by issues are critical for the duration of the projects and can be requiring that the growers offer 10 % of the crop in the strongly affected in the future by higher levels of real estate social grocery of the municipalities. Environmental speculation. For the moment it seems that it is the economic concerns are also at the forefront, through organic produc- crisis in relation to real estate collapse that “protects and tion, composting of urban food waste and greening the maintains” the municipal garden allotments in the absence city. Among the urban farmers, the main motivations to of other competitive land use. participate in the MGA were, according to specific ques- tionnaire responses (in order of importance): “to produce Theodosia Anthopoulou, Panteion University of Athens my own food”, in other words a social demand for food and Maria Partalidou, School of Agriculture, Aristotle re-appropriation; “to have affordable quality food”, mean- University of Thessaloniki. Email: [email protected] Community gardens have become central actors in the have difficulty influencing public policies beyond the local reflection on the urban model, the future of public spaces, scale. The coordination between the projects is weak, and the role of abandoned or vacant plots within the city, by although there are informal networks and occasional collab- the reclamation of public land and the fight against its priva- orations. However, at least for the time being, they are tization. They are also bringing the food debate into the proving the civil society’s capacity to regain underused urban social movements, developing self-managed ways of urban spaces and to bind local communities. meeting human needs, collaborating in the spreading of local seeds and learning about organic farming. Finally, Municipal programs they’re linking the preservation and expansion of green In 2012 the first public policies promoting allotment gardens urban areas with the development of an agro-ecological (the Municipal Garden Allotments see BOX 2) entered the production model based on local resources. They’re doing all picture, developing social gardens for self-consumption for this through the development of small-scale projects that vulnerable groups. Initially, medium-sized cities, such as can be seen as field trial spaces, where alternative answers Alexandroupolis, started these programs that spread quickly to the crisis are being explored, and fragments of a new city across the whole country: Thermi, Kalamata, Tripoli, Larissa, are being tested. Veria, Edesa, Lesbos and Crete. Nevertheless, these initiatives suffer from marked precari- Metropolitan districts of Athens are carrying out allotment ousness: insecure access to land, scarcity of economic garden programs as well. Maroussi and Agios Dimitros have resources, lack of political support, and such limiting factors been the first ones doing it. They have a similar procedure; as availability of water. Furthermore, community gardens the local government is responsible for preparing the land Urban Agriculture magazine • number 28 • December 2014 • back to contents page www.ruaf.org 34 Aristotles university garden, Thessaloniki. Photo: N Morán and JL Community garden Per.Ka.3. Photo: N Morán and JL Fernández Fernández and the watering system, which, in both cases, is made up of and samples of them are being packaged and preserved. small tanks that are refilled by trucks. Individual plots (25–50 m2) are assigned to people living in the neighbourhood. Conclusion There are special requirements for access to these plots: low Municipal allotments and community gardens are different income, unemployment, retirement, large families. Another yet complementary. The former can, through the assignment selection criterion is proximity to the site, in order to make of individual plots, fulfil the basic food needs of families. accessibility and daily control easier. Community gardens focus on agri-food learning and reflection through common work and cooperation; moreover, they The plots are for free, although part of the products must be show that public spaces that can no longer be maintained by sent to municipal social services to be cooked in social kitchens. the public administration can be recovered by community Organic production systems are compulsory, and there is groups. technical support from municipal workers or from collabo- rating organisations such as the NGO Anodos, that works These social initiatives have shown by their small examples daily in the Agios Dimitros allotments, helping the gardeners that urban agriculture projects have the potential to impact to design their plots, and supervising the tool and water not only food access, but also social cohesion, education and distribution. employment, developing an alternative social, economic and environmental model, and making the most of public Social allotment gardens have triggered a new use for spaces and resources. vacant public plots; besides, they are playing several social roles, providing neighbourhood meeting places, and Still, much more can be done. All of these urban agriculture improving gardeners’ self-esteem when they enjoy the initiatives point to a wide range of opportunities; even activity, although some people can also experience it as a though big investments and large projects are no longer sign of social failure. possible, new ways of urban development can be explored through the agro-ecology and local development approach. Peliti One of the central entities holding up the agro-ecological Nerea Morán movement in Greece is the Peliti Alternative Community, a COST Action Urban Allotment Gardens in European Cities social network that works on biodiversity and local seeds. Email: [email protected] Peliti is the dialect name of the oak tree, which has traditionally been planted in the village squares, and around which local Jose Luis Fernández de Casadevante communities used to meet. In the shade of Peliti we can find Federation of Madrid Neighbours’ Associations – FRAVM professional farmers, amateur growers, allotments, school Email: [email protected] vegetable gardens or community gardens. For almost 20 years, Peliti has been mobilising the preservation, collection, exchange and multiplication of Greek local varieties, References through a network that has now reached more than 120.000 Anthopoulou, T. (ed), (2013). Urban Agriculture. Social Inclusion and growers. Participants save seeds, and share and exchange them Sustainable City. Case study of two municipal gardens in Northern Greece. Athens: Panteion University. with others. Seeds are distributed freely by post or at local festi- Stavrides, S. (2010). Towards the City of Thresholds. Trento: vals. There are 12 local groups of Peliti throughout the country, Professional dreamers. organising exchange and training events. Since 1999 Peliti has For more information been holding an annual national festival, every April, with seed Athens Community Gardens blogs. exchanges, workshops and conferences. Per.Ka. http://perka.org Peliti: www.peliti.gr Anoixto Diktio: http://open-works.org/pages/anoihto-diktyo-ypostirixis In 2012 Peliti started a seed bank in Paranestiou, supported by City Farmer Greece: http://cityfarmer.gr the municipality; a database of local varieties has been created; Urban Agriculture magazine • number 28 • December 2014 • back to contents page www.ruaf.org Coping with Flooding 37 in Bangkok Piyapong Boossabong From late 2011 to early 2012 many areas in Bangkok, the capital and the biggest city in Thailand, faced the most terrible flooding in roughly 70 years. Even though flooding is common in some areas in the city, this time more than half of the city was flooded with water levels reaching up to more than 2 metres. Food shortages occurred as a result of this disaster. Policy networks on urban agriculture played an important role in dealing with the urban food problems that emerged during the floods. Floods and food shortages in Bangkok Bangkok’s inhabitants mainly depend on food transports from outside the city, especially dominated by a few monopoly food corporations. Such corporations own discount and conve- nience stores, which can be found everywhere. A survey by Rapijun Phoorisumboon (2012) found that these stores control ϔ food production and distribution, shape consumer food Photo: Health-Me Organic Delivery culture, and also contribute to a reduction of local food variety. Urban agriculture: an alternative strategy for When flooding converted the main road into a river, trans- dealing with the urban food agenda during floods portation of goods was interrupted. Many food industries Small-scale farming in the city is one of the cultural identi- and distribution stores were flooded as well. As a result, ties of Bangkok. Not only are there still 13,774 full-time farm- consumer demand for food could no longer be met, and food ing households out of a total population of 5.7 million, who prices increased. On average, food prices increased by 3-4 cultivate over 70,000 acres located in Bangkok’s periurban times, while in the case of vegetables, prices were even ten fringe (Policy and Planning Division, 2012); there are also times higher. many communities, organisations and households growing vegetables in the inner city. The awareness on city farming As a consequence, about 41,500 households could not access has clearly developed since 1997, when Thailand faced a enough food, while others lacked specific types of food harsh economic crisis known as the ‘Tom Yum Kung’ crisis. At (mainly fresh products) (surveyed by Bangkok Metropolitan that time, the King, who is generally respected by Thai people Administration in 15 October 2011). Certainly, the urban poor as a father of the country, made a speech about growing food and marginalised people were the most vulnerable and in limited areas by low-input methods and for self-reliance. affected. His speech promoted Thai people to grow food everywhere. Even though inner city farming is of small scale and only The mainstream food aid system and its contributes to a minor extent to an alternative food system, problems in many respects it is able to play an important role, specifi- The mainstream aid system responded to the food crisis by cally for the urban poor and marginalised groups. City farm- providing food through public agencies with the support of ing has been supported by many actors, especially since 2010 many corporations and international organisations. Mainly when the City Farm programme was endorsed by the dried and processed food items such as instant noodles and National Health Promotion Foundation, the Prime Minister’s canned fish were provided, while fresh food was rarely avail- Office. The various actions implemented by different actors able. Because of the centralised allocation units, “one-size-fits- under the umbrella of the City Farm programme are defined all” approach and political bias of food allocation, food aids did here as policy networks on urban agriculture (for more on the not reach and meet the need of many vulnerable groups. concept of policy networks see Marsh, 1998, p.8). Urban Agriculture magazine • number 27 • March 2014 www.ruaf.org Coping with Flooding in Bangkok The City Farm programme was funded under the food and aid system. They did so by mobilising local actor networks nutrition programme of the National Health Promotion and by utilising the capacity of the local food system. The Foundation and managed by many non-governmental following are some examples of the interventions supported bodies led by the Thailand Sustainable Agriculture by the policy networks during the floods. 38 Foundation, Centre of Media for Development, Working Group on Food for Change and the City Farm Association (a Providing food for the most vulnerable people cooperation of different social enterprises). The programme during the disaster involved a variety of actors, such as the District Administration While the most vulnerable households, such as the urban offices (local government), Green Market Networks, Slum poor and the marginalised groups, did not receive specific Dwellers Networks and Informal Labour Networks, green attention from the mainstream food aid system, the policy food corporations, social enterprises, social activists and networks on urban agriculture prioritised support to them. community based organisations. As vegetables were rare and very expensive during the flood period, the policy networks mainly provided vegetables collected from local sources and the urban agriculture Policies should adequately projects developed by them. respond to the urban food Providing materials and training on producing emergency food agenda that is at stake during The proverb “to teach somebody to fish is better than to give extreme climate events him fish” became one of the principles of the work of the policy networks. Next to food distribution, the policy networks provided a set of materials, training and assistance to the flood victims on simple and short-period food produc- At the beginning of the programme the policy networks tion, such as sprouts and mushrooms. Each household could promoted urban agriculture as an activity to enhance city produce 3 kilogrammes of sprouts every 3 days, while they dwellers’ livelihoods. However, the extreme flooding led the could produce 20 kilogrammes of mushrooms from 20 policy networks to rethink and reshape their strategies. chunks provided to them. To cook food without electricity, During the floods, the policy networks worked intensively victims were provided a solar power cooking box. and collectively to respond to the urban food shortages that had occurred. They realised that urban agriculture not only Developing food innovations for living with contributes to enhancing livelihoods, but can also be water promoted as a strategy for climate change mitigation and Once the floods were forecasted to persist longer, many of adaptation. the policy networks organised meetings and focus groups for sharing experiences and to develop food innovations for In dealing with the food agenda during floods, the policy living with water. They established the temporary move- networks filled the gap that was left by the mainstream food ment named “GOD”: “Growing Out Disaster”. They tried to Training on growing sprouts at Kehatungsonghong-Samsoonhok Photo: Centre of Media for Development Urban Agriculture magazine • number 27 • March 2014 www.ruaf.org Discussion The possibility of urban agriculture to enhance the adaptive capacity of the city to respond to the urban food agenda during an extreme climate event has now been demon- strated in a country that always considered itself to be a land 39 where food is abundant. Nevertheless, the policy networks on urban agriculture in Bangkok are still insufficiently recog- nised as alternative food governance mechanisms and can only contribute on a small scale, mainly as a result of contin- ued government priorities to support the industrial food system, and the absence of international recognition for urban agriculture as a disaster risk reduction strategy. Apart from that, the policy networks on urban agriculture are hindered by contradictory roles of the national and regional governments. For example, while they agree with the devel- opment of food innovations such as floating gardens, they do not allow any objects that may obstruct the water flow in the river. The policy networks are also challenged by the problem of accessing land for farming in the city and secur- ing the land rights of the city farms. The policy networks are not able to respond to such challenges alone as this requires a transformation of the formal land ownership structure in Bangkok. ϔ A positive outcome however is that city dwellers have Photo: Nardsiri Gomonpun, City Farm programme coordinator become more aware of the issues of food insecurity and the right to food. The number of requests for training is increas- teach and share food innovations for living with water and ing. The policy networks are also expanding, as many new promoted these amongst the city dwellers. Some of the inno- actors become engaged. An important question that vations include rooftop gardening, vertical gardening, grow- remains is how to further enhance the collaborative gover- ing food in containers, hanging gardens, floating gardens, nance of the policy networks on urban agriculture to respond and applying a farming technique called “EM ball” (an effec- adequately to urban food agendas that are at stake during tive microorganism ball for flood water decontamination). possible future extreme climate events. Supporting mutual aid during floods Piyapong Boossabong Another contribution of the policy networks was the support Head of the Thai City Farm Programme Monitoring and Evaluation to mutual flood aid between city farm consumers and Team, PhD. Candidate, Development Planning Unit, UCL producers who had joined the Community Supported Email: [email protected] Agriculture (CSA) programme facilitated by the policy networks. For example, the green restaurant called “Health-Me Organic Delivery”, in cooperation with the Green Market Network and the Working Group on Food for Change, Note established free cafeteria nodes located near the places of This article is a summarised version of a full paper that was the farmers that were flooded. The temporary cafeterias presented at the RGS-IBG International Conference on Governance of Urban Environmental Risks in the Global South, Edinburgh, became a space for daily cooking and eating food from these Scotland, 3-5 July 2012. producers. The green restaurant provides information that these cafeterias could feed roughly 2,100 victims from 5 References different areas. The policy networks also mobilised collective Boossabong, P., 2012, Growing Cities for Growing Life: Ideas and Practices of Urban Agriculture, Bangkok: National Health Promotion actions to share seeds with the involved city farmers and to Foundation and Thailand Sustainable Agriculture Foundation. support the farmers to re-establish and habilitate their plots Hutapate, K., 2011, Green Life Bag, Natural Agriculture Magazine, and farms. Vol.14, No.10, pp.5-7. Marsh, D. (ed.), 1998, Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham and Moreover, the policy networks also played an important role Philadelphia: Open University Press. Phoorisumboon, R., 2012, The centralisation of food distribution and in criticising the priorities of the government, under which its impacts on food security during Thai floods. The national farm areas were poorly protected, and the role of monopo- conference on seed freedom, food sovereignty and food security, lised and centralised food distribution in the mainstream Kasetsart University, 16-17th May 2012. food system. They played a role in raising awareness on Policy and Planning Division, 2012, Agriculture in Bangkok, Research urban food security, food sovereignty, environmental Report, Department of City Planning, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. sustainability, and adaptation to climate change. Urban Agriculture magazine • number 27 • March 2014 www.ruaf.org 4719-2006 UA Magazine 21-11-2006 15:43 Pagina 32 The Beijing Urban Agriculture Policy Guidelines: A milestone This paper presents the main points of the draft policy guidelines for development of urban agriculture in Beijing. These guidelines are currently awaiting final approval by the Beijing People’s Congress and will be an important milestone in the development of urban and periurban agriculture in the city of Beijing in the coming decades. overing an area of 16,808 sq. km, the municipality of Beijing is divided C into 16 districts and 2 counties. In 2004, the registered population numbered over 14.5 million, of which 3.2 million were living in the periurban areas. Liu Junping. Millions of people have migrated to Beijing in search of jobs and economic Awards handed out at the “village for folklore” tours in Beijing security. At present there are more than 4 million migrants in the city (who lack the ecological function also received more agriculture like agro-tourism and status of a registered citizen of Beijing). attention. ecological management. New and expanding businesses and The Beijing municipal government A key element in the city’s efforts to residential areas have pushed the urban adopted sustainable development as its develop periurban agriculture is the boundaries far into the areas surrounding main strategy after 1995. It also “2-2-1 Action Programme on Urban the city, leading to a large loss of unofficially included (multi-functional) Agriculture”, a comprehensive farmland in the periurban areas (about urban agriculture in its land use policy, programme initiated by the Beijing 40,600 hectares in the period 1986-1995 since all land in Beijing was zoned and municipal government in April 2004 that: alone). given a specific function, such as grain • analyses market demand production, agro-tourism, ecological • strengthens development and CHANGING VIEWS ON THE protection, food processing, and so on. management of agricultural resources FUNCTIONS OF (PERI)URBAN The 1995 Land Use Policy is based on the • mobilises investment in agriculture and AGRICULTURE IN BEIJING conviction that agricultural land in and credit provision to farmers Until recently, the Beijing policy on • strengthens cooperation among farmers agricultural land use was focused entirely Other functions of the • stimulates agricultural technology on the production of grains (especially periurban areas of development and maintains an rice). In the late eighties and early Beijing have also become information centre as a platform for nineties various measures were adopted important sharing agro-technologies and to slow down the loss of farmland experiences (especially prime agricultural land) in the around the city cannot be effectively • supports key agro-enterprises and Beijing municipal area, including the protected by the local government, builds up agro-product brands, “Regulations on the protection of Basic unless its economic return is comparable marketing and certification Farmland” issued in 1994 and the and competitive to other types of urban • supports greenhouse agriculture and establishment of the Bureau of Land land use. The enhancement of the value introduces new seeds. Management in 1995. Tree growing (e.g. of agricultural land use in urban and along highways) and the creation of periurban Beijing, therefore, became a As a result, the productivity of urban and periurban zones with an key objective of the municipal and agricultural land in periurban Beijing has district governments of Beijing, both by increased and traditional farming (mainly CAI Jianming, LIU Shenghe, YANG Zhenshan, stimulating changes in the agricultural grains) has gradually given way to more YUAN Hong, JIANG Fang production structure as well as by intensive production systems often ✉ [email protected] promoting other functions of periurban linked with agro-enterprises that 32 UA-Magazine 4719-2006 UA Magazine 21-11-2006 15:43 Pagina 33 undertake the processing and marketing Tourism Association, drafted the Beijing - Integration of agricultural (herbs, vegetables, animal products, Urban Agriculture Policy Guidelines, production with ecological and social flowers, tree seedlings, pot plants, etc.). which were recently submitted for services. The social and ecological approval as a Municipal Bye law. benefits of urban agriculture are just as Other functions of the periurban areas of These guidelines contain the views of the valuable as the economic gains of urban Beijing have also become more agriculture for sustainable city important. For instance, agro-tourism in Urban agriculture development. The development of the periurban Beijing has made great has proven to be a agricultural production function has to progress in the last decade and generates powerful development be combined with the development of new income opportunities for the force in Beijing the ecological and social functions of farmers. Agriculture also increasingly urban agriculture for Beijing city plays a role in environmental Beijing municipal government on the development. improvement (urban greening, dust and comprehensive development of - Cooperation and diversity at heat reduction by tree growing, water agriculture in the periurban areas of different levels. Cooperation is needed management, recycling of organic Beijing, addressing its multi-functional and will be facilitated at district, city and wastes, etc.). More recently, the role of character. Through the development of regional level, and differences in periurban agriculture in enhancing social urban agriculture, the policy seeks to agricultural assets and social economic security and income /employment enhance the urban and periurban conditions between the various locations generation, especially for the poor economy, improve urban farmers’ will be taken into account. migrants, has also received increasing income, generate employment, enhance attention. social security and improve the Implementation of the policy guidelines environment. All of these factors will on urban agriculture will mainly focus on The RUAF programme, through its contribute to the goal of creating a three aspects: spatial allocation, regional partner IGSNRR, supported the sustainable city. implementation of support programmes design and implementation of the 2-2-1 and financing for urban agriculture. programme, through training, a situation The municipal government is proposing a analysis, multi-stakeholder action two-step plan. The first step is to planning and monitoring activities. modernise local agriculture in the coming A number of lessons have been learned 3-5 years, by diversifying different types through this programme in the past two of specialised production, modernising years: facilities, improving production • Urban agriculture needs to be fully processes, and modernising management integrated into city planning. (and labelling of products). The second • Public participation is important and step, in the subsequent 5-10 years, is to needs to be enhanced. Many decisions strive for an urban agriculture system require public involvement, because so that is integrated in the city’s sustainable far the farmers’ interests alone are not development. Lu Mingwei considered enough. Cherry picking in Sijiqing gardens, • There is a lack of investment in urban BASIC PRINCIPLES Haidian district, Beijing agriculture. This is the most common The principles of the new urban complaint from the urban agricultural agriculture development policy can be SPATIAL ALLOCATION stakeholders. summarised as follows: The spatial structure of Beijing has a • More research is needed on the impacts concentric configuration. Various belts of urban agriculture and its - Linking local conditions to the (i.e. the inner city belt, the inner suburban development needs to be more closely Beijing master plan. The development belt, the outer suburban belt, the monitored. of urban agriculture in each district or mountainous area, and surrounding rural There is too much duplication of projects, county of Beijing should comply with the areas) have different agricultural assets, e.g. redundancy of agro-tourism facilities requirements of the Beijing master plan such as land and water, which has led to in the same area. as well as take the specific characteristics the development of different types of Collaboration between agro-based of the local situation into consideration. agriculture and other activities. The enterprises and farmers (including - Market orientation. Agricultural Beijing Urban Agricultural Policy migrants) needs to be stimulated. production and management and agro- identifies a specific strategy for the industry production will more strongly development of urban agriculture in each THE (DRAFT) BEIJING URBAN follow market demand for agricultural zone. AGRICULTURE POLICY GUIDELINES products and other services (regional, (2006) national and international markets). IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMMES Based on the experiences gained in the - Efficient use of resources. Furthermore, a number of programmes 2-2-1 programme, the Beijing Agricultural Introduction and use of new agricultural will be undertaken in each belt (see table) Bureau, assisted by the international technologies will be oriented towards a that link the development of urban RUAF-programme through its regional more efficient use of available resources, agriculture with the various objectives of partner IGSNRR and the Beijing Agro- particularly land and water. integrated city development. October 2006 33 4719-2006 UA Magazine 21-11-2006 15:43 Pagina 34 The modernisation of the agricultural sector will be stimulated by improving the basic infrastructure, building agricultural facilities, and human capacity building, including building greenhouses, irrigation systems and promoting new types of energy, such as wind and bio-energy. The presence of the city’s infrastructure and markets are important and the urban agricultural enterprises in Beijing will be stimulated to fully exploit the existing and future markets, establish agro-logistic systems, Spatial allocation of urban agriculture activities in Beijing and add output value by using new agricultural technologies. FINANCING • A facilitative environment will be Key sectors will be given priority, like Beijing will adopt the following policies created for further development of seed production and distribution, the for financing the development of urban urban agriculture, involving farmers and production of local specialised products, agriculture: consumers in the planning process by agro-processing and agro-ecotourism. applying a multi-stakeholder approach • Various sources of possible investment to project planning and implementation. The multiple functions of urban will be explored and stimulated, like • Local governments will strengthen agriculture will be fully exploited. fiscal budgets of municipal and local monitoring and management of the Activities to enhance the ecological governments, enterprise investments, implementation of these activities and functions include tree planting in the various types of bank loans, and foreign an impact evaluation system will be inner city, construction of green zones in investment. established. Participatory and self- the inner suburban areas, recovery of • Local governments will facilitate the evaluation is a necessary part of this system. Objective level Programmes Adjusting the agricultural industrial structure CONCLUSIONS Construction of agricultural facilities Urban agriculture has proven to be a pow- Agricultural Improvement of food security erful development force in Beijing. It has growth Improvement of industrial management and operation of improved the living standards of its inhab- agriculture itants by generating employment and Broadening the agricultural market income for resident and migrant urban Establishing an agro-technology service system and improving farmers. It promotes social cohesion by Rural public services in periurban areas engaging citizens in the urban-planning construction Improving the ICT infrastructure in periurban areas process. It maintains urban green spaces City Enhancing the social functions of urban agriculture and limits urban sprawl. It encourages development Strengthening the ecological function of urban agriculture proper management and recycling of urban water resources. Table 1 Implementation programmes and related policy objectives The new policy guidelines will foster the further development of urban and periur- degraded and waste lands, reduction of availability and implementation of ban agriculture in Beijing as an integral agricultural contamination, and critical and advanced agricultural part of its sustainable city development preservation of vegetation in the technologies. strategy. Approval of these guidelines will mountainous areas. The development of • Governments should guarantee basic be an important milestone in the develop- regulations for environmental protection infrastructure and agro-facilities, such ment of urban agriculture in Beijing. of vulnerable areas should protect areas as water, electricity and transport. that are of special ecological importance. PLANNING AND MONITORING References Social functions will be stimulated by In order to implement and monitor these Beijing Bureau of Land and Housing providing training and mutual learning in policy guidelines the following measures Management, 1997, Land resources in Beijing periurban communities and participation will be taken: Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2004, Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2004, China Statistics of citizens in decision making. Press Agricultural associations are seen as an • Acceleration of the planning process on Beijing Urban Agriculture Development Policy important means to enhance the urban agriculture will be the main task Guidelines (Draft), 2006 Yang Zhenshan, 2005, Enterprise-based urban inclusion of migrants and small farmers for governmental agencies. In order to agriculture development in Peri-urban Beijing in this process and to link them with achieve this aim, close collaboration and (master’s thesis), Institute of Geographical agro-enterprises, NGOs and local coordination between various Sciences and Natural Resources Research Research Team, 2005, Study on Land use governments. departments and officials will be Strategy in Beijing, Institute of Geographical necessary. Sciences and Natural Resources Research 34 UA-Magazine Different types of Agricultural Cooperatives with Periurban Farmers in China: two cases In 1978, China started to dismantle the commune system and the so- called “eating from the same big Hong Yuan pot” that existed for decades, i.e. absolute egalitarianism whereby everyone gets the same benefits irrespective of his/her performance. Village land began to be contracted to peasant families on a 30-year basis in most cases and a system of “household contract responsibility” was introduced that set farm output quotas for each household and linked remuneration to output. his mobilised the peasants’ enthu- siasm for agricultural production. T But as the market economy devel- oped, the “household contract responsi- Cooperative chairperson Ms. Zan explains the history of the cooperative to visitors bility” system became less adequate, since it did not sufficiently stimulate moderni- some villages (like in the outer parts of village management may make arrange- sation of the farming systems and left the periurban region of Beijing), land is ments for large-scale production (or small-scale farmers in a weak position on allocated according to land-use rights and other land use e.g. agritourism parks) in the markets. Hence, agricultural coopera- managed by the villagers individually. In cooperation with one or more agro-enter- tives were created that facilitate capacity this situation farmer cooperatives can be prises and/or a (local, district, provincial) building and joint marketing, often closely built from the bottom up with the small- government, if the villagers holding land- linked to (party-led) village-level manage- scale farmers. In this type of cooperative use rights agree to participate. ment. There are currently about 150,000 the small farmers establish a contract with farmer cooperatives in the country, 1,000 the cooperative to which they supply their In such a top-down cooperative, the of which are located in periurban Beijing. products and from which they receive villagers may become shareholders by training, marketing and other services. contributing their land use rights while the Privately owned land does not exist in Such cooperatives are often relatively external partners bring in capital and/or China; all land is owned by the state (in loosely organised and their formation technology. urban areas) or by village collectives (in might be hampered by the scattered rural areas). This fact determines the way location of the small farmers in the Below we present two cases, one of a top- cooperatives are organised. Two main village area. In addition, the bottom-up down cooperative and one of a bottom-up forms of agricultural cooperatives can be cooperatives often lack sufficient capital, cooperative of periurban farmers, to illus- distinguished: technology and management skills. trate the strengths and weaknesses of both Top-down cooperatives (in which models in the actual Chinese context. Bottom-up cooperatives (in which governmental organisations and/or large farmers themselves play a key role): In agro-entreprises play a dominant role): THE DINGXIANG COUNTY GREEN In some villages, villagers hold land-use FOOD ASSOCIATION IN DINGXIANG: Feifei Zhang rights, but the land is managed collectively A TOP-DOWN PROCESS Institute of Geographical Sciences and rather than individually, and the village With a contribution by Mr Xishan Gong, Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) committee will periodically allot dividends Engineer General in Dingxiang Agriculture Guoxia Wang to the villagers according to their land-use Bureau Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shangxi Province, rights. This situation can often be encoun- Jianming Cai tered closer to the cities where land prices Dingxiang is a county located in the IGSNRR are rising quickly as well as new produc- periurban area of Xinzhou, a small city Corresponding author: tion, processing and marketing opportuni- of about 150,000 inhabitants in Shanxi [email protected] ties. Since the land is not distributed, the province. Dingxiang county used to be #? 36 2 *;A;TCH? René van Veenhuizen only on grape growing. Ms Zan was second strategy is to sell grapes to tourists elected as chairperson for the first term of (“pick your own fruits”). Since Huairou five years, mainly because she had demon- is located in a scenic mountainous area, strated her skills as a marketing manager thousands of tourists from Beijing visit the for the cooperative. region each year, many of whom enjoy picking grapes at local farms. Members After two years of operation, the coopera- sell some 20% of their products in this tive proved to be quite successful and the way. The third strategy is to sell cold- number of members increased to 1,108 stored grapes in the off season for much households. In 2006, the gross output of higher prices. The cooperative was able to grapes reached 3.1 million kg, with average build a 100 m2 low-temperature storage income per mu up to 15,000 yuan (more facility thanks to a 100,000 yuan grant Improved rainwater harvesting for grape than 40 times that of traditional grape from the Huairou scientific commission. production by migrants in Huairou growing). It is obvious that the members This prolonged the selling period by eight of the cooperative have increased their months and allowed the cooperative to HISTORY OF THE COOPERATIVE incomes substantially. obtain the trust required for long-term After completing a two-year study relationships with big traders. programme organised by the China TRAINING SERVICES SUPPLIED BY Grape Association Beijing Branch, Mr THE COOPERATIVE CHALLENGES AND FUTURE Qingzhong Zhao, together with his wife The cooperative not only supplies high- PERSPECTIVES Ms Xiaojing Zan, rented in 1998 a piece quality young plants at low prices to This bottom-up farmer cooperative has of land of 20 mu1) from the Angezhuang its members, but also provides training broken new ground. Its success demon- village commission and built up 5 green- and technical advice. Mr. Zhao provides strates the effectiveness of this new type houses to grow 17 new varieties of grapes. technical assistance to farmers under the of organisation. However, based on the The business was so successful that in condition that they buy their young plants experience of Huairou Grape Cooperative, 2000 they rented another 50 mu of land from him. Every Monday is consultation some challenges can still be identified: from Liyuanzhuang village to expand their day for grape farmers. Since 2002, the • The cooperative is still highly dependent activities. cooperative has been gathering informa- on its founders, Ms Zan, the chairperson tion about grape production, including the and able marketing manager, and her The success of their grape farm stimulated latest developments about grape growing husband Mr Zhao, who is very skilled in local farmers to start initiatives of their from the internet, and makes this informa- grape growing. This couple still does an own. They came to the couple asking for tion available to the farmers. Technicians excellent job and they complement each planting materials (which were initially from the China Agricultural University, other very well. However, the coopera- given for free), technical guidance and Beijing Agricultural College and China tive needs to train more persons to take marketing support. When more and more Grape Society are invited (and paid) by the on various specialised technical and producers started to consult the young cooperative to provide advise when more management tasks and to take over from couple, it became too much of a burden complicated problems are encountered the actual leaders when the need arises. and they could no longer afford to give and to provide training on the latest grape • Small bottom-up cooperatives like the away seedlings for free. growing technologies. So far, the coopera- Hairou Grape Cooperative encounter tive has organised 8 training workshops problems in obtaining sufficient govern- By then, the couple had begun considering for more than 3,800 participants, and ment support and generating the capital the idea of establishing a supply-produc- more than 20 domestic and foreign grape needed for required investments (cold tion-marketing cooperative. The coopera- varieties have been introduced in this way. storage, drip irrigation). tive would take care of the marketing of • The most urgent task of the coopera- their products, including cold storage The cooperative has also adopted a tive is to register and advertise its own facilities to store grapes that cannot be programme of “learning new things by brand and develop its own high-level sold directly to the markets. going outside” and has organised ten study green food certificate for its supermarket trips to Hebei, Shandong and Tianjin for channel. The initial phase of setting up this a total of 640 participants. This activity • Agritourism (sightseeing, fruit picking) cooperative was not easy due to the lack broadens not only the farmers’ knowledge is a good approach for raising the value of launching capital. Ms Zan persuaded but also their production and marketing of the agricultural products, since urban her family to sell their home and gathered channels. tourists show a strong interest in eating in this way 20,000 YUAN to initiate the or buying local food and experiencing cooperative with a dozen farm house- MARKETING SERVICES the production and harvesting process. holds as members. Standards for growing The cooperative applies three main More research on agritourism and the grapes and regulations for operating the marketing strategies. The first is to taste preferences of urban citizens is cooperative were defined. By 2004, the establish contracts with supermarkets. needed. cooperative was officially registered as Subsequently the cooperative makes “Huairou Fruit and Vegetable Production contracts with its members to pre-book NOTE 1) 1 mu equals about 667 m2. and Marketing Cooperative”, although the growers’ products. Members sell currently its production is still focused about 30% of their grapes in this way. The #? s the capital and one of the biggest encounter is access to land. Farmland in tions of migrant farmers are also poor. cities in China, Beijing is one of Beijing is owned by village committees. They usually build their humble dwellings A the most favoured destinations for The only way for a migrant farmer to get beside the rented farmland or green- migrants. A one percent sampling popula- access to land is to rent it directly from the houses. Their homes are small, usually tion survey in 2005 found that there were local village committee or through one of only 20-40 square metres, and barely nearly 3.6 million migrants in Beijing, the local farmers. Since June 2004, the furnished. Kitchens and toilets are very 80,000 of whom were directly involved in Beijing government has been promoting simple and usually located outside. agricultural activities, and up to 524,000 of “the transfer of the contractual right of The homes have no heating devices, and whom were engaged in related activities. land” to make it easier for migrants to many residents use firewood and coal (out lease land. In reality, though, migrant of tradition or because of low costs). Research was undertaken in four villages farmers’ right to land is not clear, and The survey revealed that one of the in Chaoyang and Shunyi district as part of most often control remains with the land reasons for these poor living conditions the RUAF Cities Farming for the Future owner. Also irregularities in contracts is that many migrant farmers initially do programme. Chaoyang district is close create problems. This limits the flexibility not see this “city lifestyle” as a long-term to the built-up areas in Beijing, and has of migrant farmers in planning and thus situation. But as their incomes improve, various types of land use. Shunyi district in their development (competition they start investing in their homes (for is located about 40 km away from the city capacity). Also, irrigation water is still example, by adding LPG and electricity). centre. It is the area’s traditional bread provided by canals, which is not efficient basket, with relatively stable land use. The and highly wasteful. Agricultural cooperatives number of migrant farmers is higher in Migrant farmers sell their grains, vege- Chaoyang than in Shunyi. Access to financing is also difficult for tables and fruits in the following ways: migrant farmers. Most farmers rely (A) door-to-door, which is the most Livelihoods on informal private loans, which have popular way; (B) directly at wholesale Migrant farmers encounter a number of been affected by the reform of the rural markets; (C) to re-sellers or restaurants; difficulties after they arrive, for example banking system in China (which has (D) through farmers’ organisations; and in building a dwelling and in finding their further weakened the uncertain position (E) through agro-tourism arrangements place in the production chain. The first of migrant farmers). Both in buying inputs (field picking). For instance, migrant and most important problem they and in selling their products, migrant farmers in Dongjiangying in Shunyi farmers are almost always at a disadvan- sell their grains directly to the nearby tage, because of their lack of money and grain storehouse. In some cases, migrant information. Initially, the city had a restric- farmers organise themselves in a coopera- Zhang Feifei, Cai Jianming, Liu Gang tive registration policy for migrants, but tive, as in Xiaodian, in Chaoyang, where Institute of Geographical Sciences and this situation has improved considerably. the migrant farmers jointly acquired Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), access to farmland and distributed it Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Other major problems migrant farmers among themselves. Such cooperatives Beijing (and other migrants) now face include the also organise their production and seek [email protected] high cost of education and the relatively marketing channels. [email protected] low quality of schools. The living condi- 'OFS 25 There is a noticeable trend among other well and trust each other, i.e. after The role of urban agriculture migrant farmers to develop and organise the migrant farmer has been in Beijing Since the mid-1980s, township and village themselves from the first stage of selling for several years (and is thus more enterprises have developed rapidly in their products directly to the consumers, integrated). Beijing, as local farmers in periurban through the next step of using inter- Beijing turn more and more to non- mediaries and finally to selling through Migrant farmers have strong links to their agricultural activities. This leads in turn to cooperatives, thereby consistently home towns and only gradually develop a lack of agricultural labour and deteriora- increasing their profits and saving time. connections to other migrants and to local tion of urban farmland. Villages in In this way migrant farmers are connected communities in the new city. Some older periurban Beijing have therefore gradu- to the city and contribute to the building migrant farmers go back home, but young ally imported migrant farmers from of communities. people mentioned in the survey that they Hebei, Henan, Shandong provinces, etc., would like to continue farming in the who are introduced to the area by their Migrant farmers’ social network city. Migrant farmers develop a relation- relatives and friends. At present Beijing Though they work and live in the city, ship with local communities initially only periurban agriculture is undertaken migrant farmers do not have formal through the market, as it is difficult to mainly by migrant farmers. This benefits connections to the city. The ties with their develop new social contacts. Although both migrants and the local population. home towns are quite close and most of the migrants share some of the same the migrant farmers go back home one to needs as other residents, the sometimes So gradually the living and production two times each year, have regular contact hostile environment keeps them isolated style and experiences of migrant farmers with their relatives, and send home remit- from the local community. It can also be change, that is, from rural agriculture to tances. Because of the high education difficult to build relationships among urban agriculture. This not only improves costs in the city, some children attend each other, as they may quarrel over such their own incomes, but also guaran- school at home and are taken care of by things as the order of watering land. tees productive use of periurban areas, their grandparents. However, the farmers often sell products supplies of niche products to the city jointly and generally collaborate to a high market, the development of other land use The incomes of most migrant farmers degree. functions (recreation and leisure), and the are higher after migration to the city building of new communities. Developing (increasing on average from 350 to 500 BUILDING NEW COMMUNITIES multi-functional urban agriculture could euros per person per year), but still After coming to the city, migrant farmers be a way of developing periurban land, lower than the average of local farmers face the challenge of building a new social maintaining green spaces, developing (800 euro). The cost of living in the city network. They are often prepared to take recreation and providing education for is higher than in the rural areas, and in up agriculture, while the local farmers children. If migrant farmers fulfil these addition migrant farmers are responsible increasingly find new jobs in the city. needs through organising themselves in a for houses and land both in their new city This relieves the tension between local cooperative, they will acquire a stronger and in their home towns. The average and migrant farmers to some extent. position in bargaining with policy makers “daily-life” expenditure per year is about Migrant farmers gradually adapt to the and integrating in the community. 400 euros, which is substantially lower new city. Most of them come to Beijing than the average expenditures on through relatives or countrymen who Increasingly migrant farmers play production (1,500 euros) and savings/ have been in Beijing for a period of time. valuable roles in the development of remittances (1,000 euros). After arriving in the city, new migrant urban and periurban agriculture, and new farmers need to build a network to protect migrant farmer communities continue Usually migrant farmers send a big part themselves and strive to earn profits in to emerge. Under current government of their earnings back home (and are an unknown environment. This includes policy, it is possible for innovative migrant thus able to save very little for their own uniting with other migrant farmers from farmers, in cooperation with local existing expenses in the city). The resulting lack different provinces, compromising to farmers’ cooperatives, to develop the of funds makes it difficult for them to buy satisfy local stakeholders and strengthen relatively weak ties among migrant inputs in the growing season. Migrant their original networks. farmers into strong cooperatives to farmers have three main sources from strengthen the process of integration and which to borrow money: Education is an important issue for as such facilitate the migration of more - People living in Beijing who come from migrants. Migrant farmers acquire a farmers to Beijing. the same region. This is very common higher income in the city, but suffer from since migrant farmers’ social networks a lower quality of life. Some of them do References Feng Xiaoying. 1996. Investigation and analysis of (as defined by Chinese rural tradition) not stay very long, but the children of farmer issues among Beijing’s migrants. are based on and strengthened by those who do remain grow up in the Economy Research Refernce.. familial and local ties. city and their feeling of community and Zhang, F. Wang, G. and Cai, J. 2007. Migrants’ Access to Land in Periurban Beijing. - Other migrant farmers. This is possible identity is based there. However, it is Urban Agriculture Magazine No.11:6-8. because the farmers live in close difficult for these children to get access to Website of Beijing rural work committee: communities (and are often rather high-quality education. They risk disap- the investigation on the transfer of the contractual right of land. isolated from the local community). pointment in life and subsequent psycho- http://www.bjnw.gov.cn/jqdt/tzggyjzcx/ncjtjj- - Local farmers. This is only an option logical problems or negative attitudes are cqzd/200607/t20060706_27816.html if the borrower and lender know each relatively high for this group. 26 2 *;A;TCH? Innovations in Greenhouse Rainwater Harvesting System in Beijing, China Beijing is a city faced with a shortage of water. Less than 600 mm of rain rainwater. Water is guided through the falls per year; but this figure is highly variable and actual rainfall has been rainwater collection flume at the bottom lower than average in the past eight years. Less than 300 cubic metres of of the greenhouse into a deposit pool and water is available per person per year; this is one eighth of the average pumped into an underground storage volume per person available in the country as a whole and one thirtieth of pool, where the temperature of the water the world average. Because of the downward trend in rainfall, surface water increases and it is mixed with micro- is gradually drying up and the level of ground water is declining. compost. The water is then again pumped into a basin and through gravity it enters the micro-irrigation system. An average ture under the motto “tap new sources greenhouse of this type is about 85 metres he agricultural sector consumes a of supply, reduce consumption and long and 8 metres wide. The plastic roof large volume of water, 90% of which prevent pollution”. Rainwater harvesting measures about 900 square metres, while T is groundwater. Excessive use of is one of these projects. The technology the cultivable area under the roof is about water for agriculture threatens Beijing’s of using the surface of greenhouses 500 square metres. ecology and the availability of water for to collect rainwater was developed in consumption. The lack of a sufficient China in 2005 by the Beijing Agricultural This technology has a number of advan- water supply also influences glass- Technology Dissemination Station and tages. Firstly, it taps a new source of house agriculture around Beijing since the Soil & Compost Work Station. Both water – rainwater – thereby reducing the it is increasingly difficult to get access authorities fall under the Beijing Bureau of pressure on groundwater. In areas that are to groundwater. Thus, saving water in Agriculture. The construction of this type suitable for agriculture, but have limited agriculture has become an urgent task and of greenhouse is subsidised and farmers access to water, the technology allows a common goal for the whole society. are supported by exhibitions, training, agricultural production and increases farmer to farmer exchanges and websites. livelihood options. The rainwater is of In April 2007 the Beijing municipal good quality for irrigation and suitable government started to charge a fee The capturing of rainwater is combined for micro-irrigation. The chemical for agricultural water use exceeding with efficient irrigation techniques (drip composition of rainwater is such that it a particular quota (depending on the irrigation). The farmers are further stimu- rarely jams micro-irrigation pipes. The production type, e.g. paddy rice, wheat, lated to include a reuse component by technology provides a reliable supply of aquaculture, vegetable gardening, fruit composting and producing biogas (see water (especially important under erratic trees, or livestock). Now if farmers exceed figure). rainfall), and thus stimulates the produc- their quota, they have to pay 0.08 Yuan per tion of several harvests of a wider diversity extra cubic metre of water used for grain The technology consists of a greenhouse of crops. This increases the benefits for crops and 0.16 Yuan per cubic metre used (see figure) with a special roof that collects farmers, and subsequently stimulates the for other crops. Most farmers are able to limit their use to stay within the quota, but with decreasing rainfall, it is becoming more important to save water and find other sources, like rainwater. Farmers’ water use for home consumption is not limited by a quota (a separate system has been imple- mented for this type of water use). A NEW TECHNOLOGY The Department of Water Saving, of the Water Authority, has undertaken a series of projects on saving water in agricul- Zhang Feifei, Cai Jianming, Ji Wenhua IGSNRR [email protected] Structure of rainwater harvesting system (one greenhouse) 20 2 *;A;TCH? local economy. After the structure is built 2.5 m high). In the rainy season, the big other farmers in vegetable and fruit by local builders, it is relatively simple to pond cannot contain all of the collected production, aquaculture, fishing and use and maintain. rainwater, so excess water will then be other leisure activities. used for aquifer recharge. The cost of - Due to the enormous pull of the labour HUAIROU constructing a big pond is estimated to market in Beijing, more and more Supported by the city of Beijing and be 200,000 Yuan (20.000 Euro) (which is farmers are getting jobs in urban areas, implemented by the Bureau of Agriculture cheaper than constructing three smaller and as a result, only elders and women and the Beijing Water Company, two pilot ponds). are engaged in agriculture. The poten- projects have been started in Huairou tially higher income of urban agriculture disctrict (one of the 10 districts in Beijing). may keep labour in the area. By using a rainwater harvesting system and It costs 80,000 Yuan (8,000 euros) to build drop irrigation in Grapes production in a - It will improve the regional food system a small tank system, but these projects greenhouse, less money needs to be spent on and development direct linkages are being fully subsidised by the Beijing labour, pesticides and electricity for pumping between farmers and urban consumers water, thereby reducing costs to about 950 government. This technology is now being Euro per greenhouse per year. This system is of organic produce; used for the production of about 10,000 ha currently being tested. - It is important to improve the regional in Huairou, and accounts for 85.3% of all food system and develop direct linkages land under irrigation. In 2007, twenty new between farmers and urban consumers rainwater greenhouses were built. The structure of a rainwater harvesting of organic produce; system under construction in Huairou - It provides an experience with participa- Each greenhouse can collect up to about tive/bottom-up development of cooper- 200 cubic metres of rainwater per year The RUAF-CFF programme supports atives and famers' organisations. (capturing water from May to October). the organisational development of the However, in the past years this amount cooperative to improve its functioning and A number of challenges remain, which has never been reached due to erratic the support it provides to its members. are the focus of current research. A first rainfall. For one cropping cycle, grapes This involves the establishment of a multi- challenge is the technical design of the need 85-100 m3/mu, Chinese cabbage functional rainwater harvesting system pond, considering the distance over which needs around 100 m3/mu, cucumber and development of the agri-tourism water has to be pumped back to the needs 60-80m3/mu, and tomato needs 80 component. The SWITCH programme greenhouses and for other uses. Another m3/mu (1 mu is approximately 670 square supports this endeavour by conducting challenge concerns the amount of land metres; the standard greenhouse would research into water flows and water needed for this system. Research will have 500 square meters or about 0.75 mu). quality. have to look into the supply of water and whether this pond could meet the needs Capturing 200 cubic meters of rainwater The proposed system will be composed of: of agricultural production every year. One would allow for 2-3 cropping cycles per - five rainwater harvesting greenhouses of the main aims and challenges for the year. But due to the scarcity of rainfall and that will support the activities of cooperative is to reduce the use of ground- land to store the water, in practice most individual farmers in the greenhouse, water while at the same time improving farmers using this technology still need to additional farming on land outside the the farmers’ incomes. add groundwater. greenhouse, other activities and aquifer In addition work needs to be done in recharge; demonstrating the potential of this pilot IMPROVING THE SYSTEMS - reuse of household grey and black water project to cooperative members and Huairou Fruit and Vegetable Cooperative and organic waste for composting and related institutions. Therefore, not only is one of the government’s pilot projects a biogas installation (for light bulbs the technical aspects, but also the whole (see UA-Magazine no. 18). The cooperative in greenhouses; compost dissolved in development process in Huairou, will specialises in the production of grapes and irrigation water); be recorded for use elsewhere and for Chinese dates. The cooperative currently - a pond system designed as an ecological showing that the system can improve the encompasses 1108 households and it has landscape (with reed, duckweed and quality of water, and provide benefits to built five greenhouses in its contracted fish) and recreational facility; various stakeholders. This approach is also farmland. But according to the coopera- - tourism/leisure infrastructure (fishing, still being researched by the cooperative. tive’s leaders, the potential of this system houses, regional food and products). has not been fully explored. In light of the opportunities offered by the growing The development of this project is based market in Beijing and the multiple on the following arguments: functions urban agriculture can offer (see - It is easier to build a big pond than five earlier papers on this in UA-Magazine), small tanks (in terms of space available René van Veenhuizen the cooperative plans to extend the single and design), although the initial cost production units into an integrated system may be higher. by combining the five greenhouses that do - It could be used to promote agri-tourism not include a rainwater harvesting system. activities, such as fishing, and lodging. The rainwater from five greenhouses - A wider impact on the community will be collected in a big pond of about is sought by developing the multiple 500 cubic metres (20 m long, 10 m wide, functions of agriculture, by involving Growing a wider diversity of crops in the greenhouse !?=?Gbegdk^c\lViZghdjgXZhVcY && jhZ^cjgWVcV\g^XjaijgZ^c *I 7ENHUA 7Z^_^c\ #AI *IANMING "EIJING IS FACING A SHORTAGE OF WATER "ECAUSE OF A DOWNWARD TREND IN RAINFALL SURFACE WATER IS GRADU ALLY DRYING UP AND THE LEVEL OF GROUNDWATER IS DECLIN ING 4HIS DECLINE IN AVAILABILITY OF WATER IS AFFECTING URBAN AGRICULTURE IN THE CITY )NNOVATIONS ARE BEING SOUGHT BY BOTH THE GOVERNMENT AND FARMERS FOCUSING ON THE USE OF NEW WATER SOURCES LIKE REUSE OF WASTEWATER AND RAINWATER HARVESTING AND IMPROVED WATER MANAGEMENT 37)4#( SUPPORTS (UAIROU #OOPERATIVE IN IMPROVING RAINWATER USE !LTHOUGH GROUNDWATER IS STILL THE MAIN WATER SOURCE E]did/GZckVcKZZc]j^oZc FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE IN "EIJING PERCENT IN IN SOME AREAS GROUNDWATER IS NOT ACCESSIBLE ANYMORE )N !PRIL THE "EIJING MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT STARTED TO CHARGE A FEE FOR AGRICUL TURAL USE EXCEEDING A CERTAIN QUOTA 4HUS FARMERS ARE CONFRONTED )N A 37)4#( VISIONING WORKSHOP IN "EIJING IN THE WITH A RISING COST OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION /N THE OTHER HAND 7ATER 6ISION FOR "EIJING WAS SUMMARISED BY THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN AGRICULTURE IS STILL COMPARATIVELY VERY LOW 37)4#( TEAM AS "Y THE CITY OF "EIJING WILL HAVE REACHED A HIGHER LEVEL 4HE AVAILABLE SURFACE WATER IN "EIJING DECREASED FROM OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT "ALANCED AVAIL BILLION M IN TO BILLION M IN AND TO ABILITY SUPPLY AND CONSUMPTION OF WATER WILL AVOID DEPLE BILLION M IN 4HE AVERAGE WATER TABLE OF GROUNDWATER TION OF GROUNDWATER LEVELS WHICH WILL BE RESTORED TO S IS MORE THAN METRES DEEP AND IN SOME PLACES MORE THAN LEVELS AND POLLUTION WILL BE MINIMISED 2IVERS AND LAKES MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE FARMERS TO USE IT WILL BE PROTECTED OR REHABILITATED TO MEET 3URFACE 7ATER 1UALITY 3TANDARDS GRADE ))) AND ABOVE AND RIVERS WILL FLOW ALL YEAR ROUND 7ATER QUALITY AT THE TAP WILL MEET INTERNA 4HE 37)4#( PROGRAMME SUPPORTS THE DEMONSTRATION OF MULTIPLE USES OF RAINWATER INCLUDING AN AGRO TOURISM COMPONENT AND BY TIONAL DRINKING WATER STANDARDS CONDUCTING RESEARCH INTO WATER FLOWS WATER QUALITY AND THE COST 4HERE WILL BE A HIGH DEGREE OF EQUITY AND EFFICIENCY IN WATER BENEFIT RATIO OF COLLECTING RAINWATER SEE 5! -AGAZINE FOR USE AND DIFFERENT QUALITY WATER WILL BE USED IN DIFFERENT MORE DETAILS 4HIS ARTICLE PUTS THE 37)4#( ACTIVITY IN "EIJING INTO SECTORS AS APPROPRIATE (ARMONISED REGIONAL WATER USE WILL A BROADER CONTEXT BE ACHIEVED THROUGH FAIR SPATIAL ALLOCATION OF WATER 7ASTEWATER USE RESOURCES CONFLICTS BETWEEN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM 4HE USE OF WASTEWATER HAS A LONG HISTORY IN #HINA "UT NOT UNTIL AREAS WILL BE AVOIDED THROUGH NEGOTIATION AND APPROPRI DID FARMERS AROUND "EIJING START TO USE TREATED WATER FROM ATE COMPENSATION 'OOD WATER GOVERNANCE OPEN PUBLIC THE CENTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS WHICH WAS INITIATED BY ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO REDUCE DEPLETION OF DECISION MAKING WILL ENSURE A WATER CONSCIOUS SOCIETY AND GROUNDWATER )N ONLY MILLION M OF TREATED WATER WAS ADEQUATE PLANNING WILL MITIGATE DISASTER DAMAGE USED FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE IN "EIJING 4HIS AMOUNT INCREASED TO KhXWd7]h_Ykbjkh[bV\Vo^cZcjbWZg'%hZeiZbWZg'%%- www.ruaf.org 6YVei^c\idLViZgHXVgX^in/>begdk^c\lViZghdjgXZhVcYjhZ^cjgWVcV\g^XjaijgZ^c7Z^_^c\ MILLION M IN AND ACCOUNTED FOR ABOUT PERCENT OF MENTS 4HE NUMBER OF PROJECTS INTRODUCING THESE USES HAS BEEN TOTAL WATER USED FOR IRRIGATION 4HE TH FIVE YEAR PLAN STATES THAT INCREASING IN "EIJING ESPECIALLY IN THE LAST TWO YEARS &OR