Conversion of Mothballed Lynemouth Power Station

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conversion of Mothballed Lynemouth Power Station AUGUST 2016 CONVERSION OF MOTHBALLED LYNEMOUTH POWER STATION TO BIOMASS THREATENS FORESTS AND AGGRAVATES CLIMATE CHANGE Biomass scheme another reason for banks to blacklist controversial energy corporation EPH Lynemouth Power Station in Northumberland is now owned by EPH. The company is rapidly becoming notorious for buying dirty fossil fuel and nuclear power stations, and coal mines, and extending their working lives. Lynemouth will be EPH’s first foray into biomass and one of its first projects in the UK. It is set to run on imported woodchips from clearfelled wetland forests in the southern US. Lynemouth power station. Photo Alan Murray-Rust, CC BY-SA 2.0. WHAT IS PROPOSED? Lynemouth Power Station is a and opencast coal mines across and the country already burns former coal power station which Europe. Lynemouth was created more than this amount in power was closed at the end of 2015 to power an aluminium smelter, stations. Burning wood on this because it does not comply with but since the smelter’s closure in scale relies on wood imports and EU emissions regulations. It is in 2012, it has exported power to cannot be sustainable. the process of being converted to the National Grid. burning imported wood pellets in Lynemouth is just south of order to avoid long-term closure. To run the 420 MW power station Druridge Bay, an area already Owned initially by Rio Tinto on biomass EPH will burn an under threat from a proposed Alcan and then briefly by RWE, estimated 1.5 million tonnes of open cast coal mine. The area is Lynemouth is now owned by wood pellets a year, made from also subject to various licences for Energetický a průmyslový holding 3 million tonnes of green (freshly fracking and Underground Coal (EPH), a Czech company that cut) wood. The UK’s total annual Gasification. has recently acquired many coal, wood production (across all gas and nuclear power stations industries) is 11 million tonnes, 1 LYNEMOUTH POWER STATION CONVERSION • AUGUST 2016 WHAT STAGE IS THE PROJECT AT? The conversion of Lynemouth Power Station is guaranteed £309 800,000 tonnes of pellets a year Power Station has started million for selling electricity every (and a smaller amount in 2017) and it expects to open as a year. This includes the wholesale from Enviva, a US pellet company biomass power station in 2017. price for electricity plus a subsidy responsible for well-documented It is currently closed while the of £189 million a year1. CfDs are forest-destroying activities in the conversion takes place. not paid out of general taxation, southern United States, including but by electricity companies – passing off whole trees as Lynemouth has been awarded often the same ones receiving ‘forestry residues’. See below for a Contract for Difference (CfD) the funds! Electricity suppliers more detail. by the UK government, which then pass on this cost through is a very lucrative renewable additional charges on electricity See Biofuelwatch’s page on electricity subsidy. The CfD bills, so electricity consumers coal to biomass power station guarantees EPH £105 per unwittingly fund fake renewables conversions for more information. megawatt hour generated, which simply by paying their bills. will increase with inflation (that’s more than onshore wind energy EPH has announced that from gets). This means that Lynemouth 2018 it will be purchasing WHAT IS EPH? EPH is a Czech energy company has been reported that “leaked opencast lignite (brown coal) with fingers in many pies. documents from Panama law firm mines in Lusatia from the Founded in 2009, it has rapidly Mossack Fonseca show the Czech Swedish government-owned expanded through securing buyers are linked to suspicious company Vattenfall, in 2016. massive bank loans (over €3 offshore holdings.” These mines have been the billion in 3 transactions alone subject of many protests locally from 2012 to 2014) to purchase German NGO Urgewald has and internationally. Vattenfall was energy infrastructure including described EPH as “a kind under intense public pressure – in mines and power stations. of wrong-way driver on the Sweden and Germany – to divest EPH is two-thirds owned by European energy market” due from these mines and clean up its Czech businessman Daniel to its practice of buying up act. EPH is less easily influenced Křetínský and Slovakian coal mines and power plants by this type of pressure as it has businessman Patrik Tkáč, that would otherwise be under no shareholders or government and the remaining one third pressure to close. A recent ownership, so the lignite mines is owned by investment example of this is its acquisition are likely to stay open longer company J&T, which is also of some of Germany’s dirtiest under their new owner. owned by Patrik Tkáč. It and most carbon-intensive Germany’s Ende Gelande climate change protest in 2016 focussed on the lignite mines now owned by EPH. Photo by Rikuti, CC BY-SA 4.0. 2 LYNEMOUTH POWER STATION CONVERSION • AUGUST 2016 EPH IN THE UK As well as Lynemouth Power Currently Lynemouth and because “they are at the end of Station, EPH owns the coal-fired Eggborough Power Stations are the transmission and transactional Eggborough Power Station in EPH’s only UK assets. However, value chain; they’re discrete, and Yorkshire. That plant was due the company has expressed have got some very interesting to close, but has secured a deal interest in acquiring further coal characteristics around supply, to stay open until at least March and gas fired power stations, and demand and policy.” This means 2017 by making 775 MW available is seeking contracts to build new that EPH could play a similar for back-up power for the winter gas-fired power stations. It also role in the UK as it has in other of 2016-17. The former owners plans to launch Energy Scanner, European countries, extending of Eggborough Power Station had an online marketplace for small the life span of fossil fuels with obtained planning permission to and medium-sized enterprises to no accountability to the people convert to biomass but failed to interact with electricity suppliers, affected by air pollution and secure a Contract for Difference in 2016. EPH has stated that climate change. subsidy. EPH appears to have no it has a particular interest in plans to pursue this. the Italian and UK gas markets Wetland forest, North Carolina. Photo Enviva’s pellet-making plant, North Swainson’s Warbler. Photo US Fish and Dogwood Alliance Carolina. Photo Dogwood Alliance. Wildlife Service Northeast Region. FUELLING FOREST DESTRUCTION Despite being classed by the yellow-throated warbler, as well monoculture plantations which government as renewable as economically important species have taken their place. energy, large-scale biomass such as fish and shrimp. Mature electricity is anything but green. wetland forests are also important The southern US has no effective Over half of the pellets that stopover habitats for migrating regulatory framework to protect will fuel Lynemouth will be birds. forests. provided by Enviva, the largest pellet manufacturer in the US. The vast majority of coastal A 2013 Freedom of Information There is compelling evidence wetland forests in the region request by Biofuelwatch revealed that Enviva uses whole trees have been destroyed already, that coal to biomass conversions from clearcut biodiverse coastal in the past mainly for paper rely on slow-growing trees from forests. Research by conservation production. Now the remainders the northern hemisphere that are organisations Dogwood Alliance are facing the axe, increasingly low in bark, and that residues and the Natural Resources to produce wood pellets for like straw, or short-rotation Defense Council reveals that the EU. The UK is the largest coppicing such as miscanthus, Enviva has been logging rare customer of pellets from the US, are unsuitable because of how wetland forests in North Carolina. and we already burn significantly different kinds of biomass affect Wetland forests provide critical more than we can ever produce. the boilers of converted coal habitat for many species in Drax power station in Yorkshire plants. By converting coal fired the southern US, such as the alone burns more wood a year power stations to run on biomass, black bear, various reptiles and than the UK produces in total. we are effectively locking amphibians, songbirds such This wood comes from highly ourselves in to a future of forest as the Swainson’s warbler and biodiverse forests as well as from destruction. 3 LYNEMOUTH POWER STATION CONVERSION • AUGUST 2016 CLIMATE CHANGE Per unit of energy produced, into monoculture plantations carbon lost from forests and smokestack CO2 emissions from much of that carbon will stay in forest soils as a result of logging, biomass power stations are higher the atmosphere and never be importing biomass from across than those from coal power reabsorbed. The UK government’s the world produces emissions stations. This is because burning own analysis shows that burning from transporting and processing wood for electricity is less efficient wood, especially whole trees, the fuel. Healthy forests also play than burning coal. Companies and can result in far greater carbon a major role in regulating the policy makers ignore this carbon, emissions from logging than the rainfall cycle, storm tracks and claiming that new trees will grow carbon emitted by burning coal. the nitrogen cycle, all of which back and reabsorb the carbon At a time when we know that are vital for a stable climate. emitted from cutting down and we need to be vastly reducing Finally, mature forests sequester a burning mature ones. However, our CO2 emissions, investing in large amount of carbon from the it can take decades before that energy that will do the opposite atmosphere.
Recommended publications
  • Rotork Completes Automation Contract to Assist Decarbonisation at Lynemouth Power Station
    One of the new rail freight wagons for Lynemouth Power Station equipped with Rotork automated pneumatic control systems. Jun 21, 2018 09:00 BST Rotork completes automation contract to assist decarbonisation at Lynemouth Power Station Rotork has completed a contract to supply fully automated pneumatic control systems on high capacity biomass rail freight wagons supporting the decarbonisation project at Lynemouth Power Station in Northumberland. Rail freight manufacturer Astra Rail/Greenbrier Europe and leasing company Nacco have supplied GB Rail freight with 50 hopper wagons to support the biomass haulage contract awarded by Lynemouth Power Ltd. Each with a payload of 70tonnes, these auto-loading and discharging wagons run in two rakes (coupled groups) of 24 between the Port of Tyne and Lynemouth Power Station, delivering 37,000 tonnes of biomass per week. The Rotork design for auto-loading and discharging enables all controls, hand valves and visual indicators to be located in one place, providing safe and convenient access. Top and bottom hopper doors are operated by a magnetic sensor valve from a line side magnet. The innovative design allows any wagon in the rake to be the arming wagon. The fully automated control system enables quicker loading and unloading, requiring only supervision without manual intervention during operation. The proven design also allows for wagons to be separated and used in other rakes without any further configuration. Lynemouth Power Station has generated electricity since 1972. The plant was originally built and operated by Alcan with the purpose of providing safe and secure energy for the production of aluminium at the adjacent Lynemouth Smelter.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-Environmental Desk Study Report the Coal Authority
    Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-environmental Desk Study Report The Coal Authority March 2012 Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for The Coal Authority’s information and use in relation to informing the Client of potential geo-environmental site abnormals and constraints for the proposed redevelopment into a minewater treatment facility. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document history Job number: 5100028 Document ref: Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Draft for Client Comment MJT TA CS JPB Jan-12 Rev 2.0 Final MJT TA CS JPB Mar-12 Client signoff Client The Coal Authority Project Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Document title Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Job no. 5100028 Copy no. Document Geo-environmental Desk Study Report reference Atkins Geo-environmental Desk Study Report | Version 2.0 | March 2012 Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary i 1. Introduction 1 1.1. General 1 1.2. Background 1 1.3. Project References 1 1.4. Information Reviewed 2 1.5. Limitations 2 2. Site Area 3 2.1. Site Location 3 2.2. Site Description 3 2.3. Surrounding Area 3 2.4. Historical Land Use 4 2.5. Previous Ground Investigations 5 3. Geo-environmental Setting 6 3.1. Solid and Drift Geology 6 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Part 1)
    Northumberland Local Plan Draft Plan for Regulation 18 Consultation Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Part 1) July 2018 If you need this information in Large Print, Braille, Audio or in another format or language please contact us: (Telephone) 0345 600 6400 (Typetalk) 018001 0345 600 6400 Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………… 1 2. Background……………………………………………………….... 7 3. Planned Development…………………………………………….. 12 4. Funding……………………………………………………………... 19 5. Monitoring and Review……………………………………………. 20 6. Analysis by Infrastructure Type…………………………………… 21 7. Social and Community Infrastructure 7.1 Primary and Acute Healthcare……………………………….. 22 7.2 Libraries and County Council Contact Centres…………….. 25 7.3 Emergency Services…………………………………………… 26 7.4 Primary and Secondary Education…………………………… 28 8. Physical Infrastructure 8.1 Energy…………………………………………………………… 30 8.2 Water Supply…………………………………………………… 33 8.3 Waste Water and Waste Water Treatment………………….. 35 8.4 Flood Defence………………………………………………….. 36 8.5 Transport: Sustainable Transport…………………………….. 37 8.6 Transport: Road Network……………………………………… 40 8.7 Waste……………………………………………………………. 42 8.8 Information and Communications……………………………. 44 9. Green Infrastructure 9.1 Sports and Recreation………………………………………… 45 9.2 Open Space…………………………………………………….. 47 10. Infrastructure Schedules…………………………………………… 49 10.1 Social and Community Infrastructure Schedule…………… 50 Northumberland Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation (July 2018) Infrastructure Delivery Plan Part 1 (July 2018) 10.2 Physical Infrastructure Schedule…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Kingston University London
    KINGSTON UNIVERSITY LONDON “The Role of Institutional Entrepreneurs in Shaping the Renewable Energy Subfield in the UK during the Period 1986-2016” By Leigh St Aubyn CHAMPAGNIE Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Kingston University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy SPONSORS: YTL CORPORATION and KINGSTON UNIVERSITY SBRC FEBRUARY 2020 i ABSTRACT Historically, energy systems have contributed significantly to global carbon emissions. To address this concern, countries such as the United Kingdom (UK) have embraced technologies such as renewable energy to try and reduce their carbon footprints. In the case of the UK, this led to the renewable energy subfield becoming partially institutionalised under the enabling role of actors, which suggests that this type of institutional change warrants being examined through the lens of institutional entrepreneurship theory. This doctoral thesis rises to the challenge by conducting institutional entrepreneurship research to investigate the institutionalisation of the renewable energy subfield in the UK during the period 1986-2016. Such an investigation is of social significance because the institutionalisation of the renewable energy subfield is likely to contribute to deinstitutionalising polluting technologies such as fossil fuels, thus contributing to the UK’s transition to a low carbon economy. The thesis is an exploratory, qualitative case study that combines thirty-nine semi-structured interviews of respondents connected to the field of energy provision in the UK with an analysis of archival documents. It finds that multiple actors practised as institutional entrepreneurs during the period, these being the state and its various agencies; renewable energy practitioners/activists; incumbent energy practitioners; the European Union and the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Air Quality Review and Assessment
    FOREWORD The Government attaches great importance to the opportunities for partnership, which the management of local air quality brings. The Environment Act 1995 provides the statutory basis for consultation and liaison on the Stage 1 review and assessment and the Government expects local authorities to develop a closer relationship with other agencies, commerce and local community groups who may be able to contribute to the improvement of local air quality. For the purpose of reviewing and assessing air quality local authorities need to consult in accordance with Schedule 2 of the Act. It is proposed that consultation be carried out with: I. The Secretary of State II. The relevant Environment Agency III. The relevant highways authority IV. All neighbouring local authorities V. Any relevant National Park Authority VI. Other relevant public authorities as the local authority considers appropriate e.g. Parish Councils VII. Bodies representative of business interests Widespread consultation among the general public of the East Riding will be secured by depositing copies of this document at all Customer Service Centres, public libraries and in local secondary schools. All consultees or other interested parties wishing to comment on the review are asked to make their responses to the Director of Social Services, Housing and Public Protection, County Hall, Beverley HU17 9BA by 31 March 1999. 1 SUMMARY The Environment Act 1995 required the preparation of a National Air Quality Strategy which provides a framework for air quality control through local air quality management. Air quality standards and objectives have been enacted through the Air Quality Regulations 1997. Local Authorities are required to undertake a staged air quality review and assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Pre-Submission Draft October 2015 Contents
    Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Pre-Submission Draft October 2015 Contents Foreword 3 1 Introduction 4 2 A Spatial Portrait of Northumberland – opportunities and challenges 12 3 Spatial vision, objectives and outcomes 29 4 Delivering the vision for Northumberland 37 5 Delivering a thriving and competitive economy 46 6 Providing existing and future communities with a choice of decent, affordable homes 85 7 Green Belt 115 8 Conserving and enhancing Northumberland's distinctive and valued natural, historic, water and built environments 137 9 Ensuring connectivity and infrastructure delivery 180 10 Community well-being 195 11 Managing natural resources 205 12 Implementation 240 Glossary 246 Appendices A Employment land portfolio 262 B Primary Shopping Area and Commercial Centre boundaries 336 C Northumberland housing trajectory 2011 to 2031 348 D Green Belt Inset Boundaries for small settlements 349 E Mineral Safeguarding Areas 380 F Safeguarded minerals infrastructure 385 Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy - Pre-Submission Draft (October 2015) Foreword Foreword As Cabinet Member for Economic Growth in Northumberland, I am pleased to have overseen recent stages in the preparation of the Northumberland Local Plan 'Core Strategy' – the Council's strategic plan for the development of the County over the next decade and a half. We are now reaching the most crucial stage in the process. Soon we will be sending the Core Strategy to the Government and they will appoint an inspector to decide whether it is a sound plan. But before that, you have one final chance to shape what is in the document. Since 2012, about 5,000 people have taken the opportunity to comment on stages of the Core Strategy and 4,500 have attended drop-in sessions, meetings or workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • M&E Brochure.Indd
    INTEGRATED M&E SERVICE SOLUTIONS OFFERING A TRUSTED PACKAGE OF EXPERTISE AND SKILLS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF OUR CLIENTS Think Extraordinary. Think Spencer thespencergroup.co.uk Lighting Control Kiosk WE ARE SPENCER GROUP - M&E SERVICES Dan Whittle Sector Lead [email protected] I am proud to have a lead role in the sustained growth of Spencer Group’s M&E Services business, seeing continued investment and presence across a number of key industrial and infrastructure sectors. Our multi-skilled and widely experienced M&E professionals have been at the forefront of key innovative projects for three decades, from major rail maintenance projects and signalling control centre work, to state-of-the-art refurbishments and extensions. Our designers work in unison with our construction delivery teams, focusing on value engineering and optioneering right from the start. Whether we are delivering stand-alone M&E services as part of an overall construction project (working alongside other client contractors) or we’re combining our in-house design M&E and Civils/Building skills within existing assets, we can cater for any client requirement. SECTOR PRESENCE We support our client’s through optioneering, early contractor involvement, buildability, programme optimisation, cost analysis and value engineering to ensure we deliver the RAIL | INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL | PORTS & MARINE | PETROCHEMICAL, OIL & GAS | ENERGY & POWER | NUCLEAR | WAREHOUSING best value-adding solution available. We are well versed to operating in onerous, safety critical
    [Show full text]
  • The North East LEP Independent Economic Review Summary of The
    The North East LEP Independent Economic Review Summary of the Expert Paper and Evidence Base NELEP Independent Economic Review – Summary of Expert Papers and Evidence Review CONTENTS Introduction 1 Economic Performance in the 2000-2008 Growth Period 3 Context: SQW Review of Current Economic Performance 6 The North East in UK and Global Markets 9 Innovation 15 Capital Markets 20 Skills and Labour Market 30 Land and Premises 37 Transport 42 Governance 48 Manufacturing 50 Low Carbon Economy 53 The Service Sector 57 Private and Social Enterprise 64 Rural Economy 70 List of Respondents 75 The Synthesis Report project is part financed by the North East England European Regional Development Fund Programme 2007 to 2013 through Technical Assistance. The Department for Communities and Local Government is the managing authority for the European Regional Development Fund Programme, which is one of the funds established by the European Commission to help local areas stimulate their economic development by investing in projects which will support local businesses and create jobs. For more information visit: www.gov.uk/browse/business/funding-debt/european-regional- development-funding NELEP Independent Economic Review – Summary of Expert Papers and Evidence Review THE NORTH EAST LEP INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC REVIEW The importance of a strong and growing private, public and community sector in the North East has never been greater. The North East Local Enterprise Partnership (NELEP) has established a commission to carry out an Independent Economic Review of the NELEP economy to identify a set of strategic interventions to be implemented over the next five years to stimulate both productivity and employment growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK Marion Leroutier
    Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK Marion Leroutier To cite this version: Marion Leroutier. Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK. 2021. halshs-03265636 HAL Id: halshs-03265636 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03265636 Preprint submitted on 21 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WORKING PAPER N° 2021 – 41 Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK Marion Leroutier JEL Codes: D22, H23, Q41, Q48 Keywords: carbon tax, electricity generation, synthetic control method. Carbon Pricing and Power Sector Decarbonisation: Evidence from the UK Marion Leroutier∗ June 21, 2021 Abstract Decreasing greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation is crucial to tackle climate change. Yet, empirically little is known on the effectiveness of economic instru- ments in the power sector. This paper examines the impact of the UK Carbon Price Support (CPS), a carbon tax implemented in the UK power sector in 2013. Compared to a synthetic control unit built from other European countries, emissions from the UK power sector declined by 26 percent on an average year between 2013 and 2017. Bounds on the effects of potential UK confounding policies and several placebo tests suggest that the carbon tax caused at least 80% of this decrease.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication - Duty to Co-Operate Statement
    Core Strategy and Development Plan Publication - Duty to co-operate Statement December 2018 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 2. Strategic Context of the North East ..................................................................................... 5 3. Duty to Cooperate between Seven Local Authorities ........................................................... 11 Status of Local Plan ............................................................................................................. 11 Working together to meet the Duty ...................................................................................... 11 Governance ........................................................................................................................ 12 North of Tyne Devolution ..................................................................................................... 13 Working together going forward ........................................................................................... 13 4. Duty to Cooperate with Each Authority .............................................................................. 15 Sunderland City Council and Gateshead Council ..................................................................... 15 Sunderland and South Tyneside Council ................................................................................ 22 Sunderland City Council and Durham County Council ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Selby Strategic Development Framework
    58 3Energy 58 3Energy 59 Energy 3 Energy 60 e rely on energy in every aspect of our lives, taking Wfor granted that we will have access to heat, power and fuel. But with declining gas, oil and coal production, and ageing nuclear power stations Britain is at a crossroads. The threat of climate change also requires us to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by cutting fossil fuel use. Government expects industry to respond to this ‘green’ agenda, but we will all have a role to play. A strategy is urgently needed that sets out a vision for our future energy security – one based on sustainable development and diversity of supply. Humberside’s King’s Dock, imported coal bunker, credit to: Getmapping energy 1 61 How secure is our energy supply? Could Selby flood more often? Climate change predictions for the Yorkshire and Humber region For the last few decades the UK has The floods in 2000 and 2002 2050-2080 been relatively self-sufficient for resulted in millions of pounds of energy. Plentiful supplies of coal, damage to homes and businesses Sea levels: Rise of up to 82 cm oil and gas kept power stations go- across North Yorkshire. Selby Dis- resulting in higher tidal surges ing, the lights switched on and our trict residents have felt the economic and greater salinity homes warm. However, with declin- impact as homes and businesses Temperatures: 1.6 to 3.9oC ing reserves of North Sea gas and have become more difficult and warmer resulting in more oil, and the decline of our coal indus- costly to insure.
    [Show full text]
  • Eggborough CCGT Appendix 10G: Fish Survey Report
    Environmental Statement: Volume III Appendix 10G: Fish Survey Report Eggborough CCGT Appendix 10G: Fish Survey Report The lagoon at Eggborough Power Station © Richard Berridge ECON Ecological Consultancy Limited Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park, Little Plumstead, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 5FH Registered in England & Wales Company No. 6457758. Director: Dr Martin Perrow BSc, PhD, MIEEM, MIFM, CEnv C0mpany Secretary: Eleanor Skeate BSc Eggborough CCGT Appendix 10G: Fish Survey Report May 2017 Prepared by: Mark Tomlinson Dr. Andrew Harwood Richard Berridge ECON, Ecological Consultancy limited Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park Little Plumstead Norwich NR13 5FH Prepared for: AECOM Project Manager: Kirsty Cobb 5th Floor 2 City Walk Leeds LS11 9AR Version Authors Description & amendment Approved by Date 01 MT/ DCO application submission KC May 2017 AECOM Eggborough CCGT Appendix 10G: Fish Survey Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Aim........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Survey design .......................................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 Site descriptions ....................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 The lagoon
    [Show full text]