Resource Limitation Affects Productivity and Heterocyst Formation in Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacteria
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Resource limitation affects productivity and heterocyst formation in nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria Hansen Johnson Semester in Environmental Science, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA Bates College, Lewiston, ME Mentors: Ed Rastetter and Zoe Cardon December 2011 Keywords: Resource optimization, substitutable resource, cyanobacteria, heterocyst, Anabaena, Abstract Cyanobacteria, of the species Anabaena circinalis, were used as model organisms to test several ideas pertaining to the concept of substitutable resource optimization. These cyanobacteria can acquire nitrogen through fixation or assimilation of nitrate. Fixation requires the presence of heterocysts, which are specialized cells that are energetically expensive to make, while assimilation is only possible when nitrate is available in sufficient concentrations. The primary goals of this study were to compare Anabaena growth and heterocyst development over a nitrogen and phosphorus gradient as well as determine if substitutable resource acquisition strategies can differentially affect the environment. A regression design was used to establish growth solutions with a nitrogen gradient from 0.3 to 300.3 mg/L nitrate and a phosphorus gradient from 0.035 to 70 mg/L phosphate. Samples were incubated for 14 days before being analyzed for chlorophyll a concentration, dry biomass, heterocyst density, filament length, 13-C and 15-N isotope fractionation, pH, and alkalinity. The phosphorus gradient had no significant effect on any treatment. Chlorophyll a concentration, filament length, and pH all agreed that optimal growth occurred at 30 mg/L nitrate. Heterocyst density showed that heterocysts only formed below 10 mg/L nitrate, and this concentration indicated the point at which the Anabaena switched between fixing nitrogen and assimilating nitrate. These two processes had differential effects on the environment as nitrate assimilation generated alkalinity while nitrogen fixation did not. Because nitrate assimilation generated alkalinity, the total pool of dissolved inorganic carbon actually increased as available nitrogen increased. Introduction Plants have evolved impressive strategies of compensating for conditions across the globe in which the relative availability of essential resources often vary by more than two orders of magnitude (Chapin et al 1987). The plants, and other organisms, that are confronted with this variation survive by allocating their effort to acquire the resources necessary to maximize growth and production in a process called resource optimization. This concept has developed over the last thirty years and has been substantiated by both field and modeled observations and experimentation (Rastetter et al 2001). Further study has revealed that organisms often have two or more strategies that can be substituted for one another to fulfill the same resource requirement. Strategic allocation of resources of this kind is more specifically referred to as substitutable resource optimization (Tilman 1982; Rastetter forthcoming). Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria, often referred to as perfect producers for their unique ability to both fix nitrogen and perform oxygenic photosynthesis, consistently choose among three sources of nitrogen; they can either fix nitrogen gas from the atmosphere or acquire nitrate or ammonium in their environment (Kumar et al 2010). Cyanobacteria have specialized cells called heterocysts that enable nitrogen fixation. These thick-walled, anoxic cells have the ability to form and break down depending on environmental conditions (Mariscal and Flores 2010). Depending on availability, some species of cyanobacteria can also either take up carbon dioxide or bicarbonate as substitutable sources of carbon (Gundersen and Mountain 1973). The pathways that cyanobacteria choose to acquire these substitutable nutrients affects both the organism and its environment. 2 One would intuitively believe that cyanobacteria’s ability to obtain the same resource through multiple pathways would allow it to dominate many systems (Vitousek and Howarth 1991). Dierber and Scheinkman (1987) found nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria often does play an important role in nitrogen cycling, providing close to half of all nitrogen inputs to a freshwater lake in Florida. Cyanobacteria also receive a lot of publicity for the dense and often destructive blooms that occur periodically under the right circumstances. Blooms can form thick mats that consume oxygen, block light, and even emit strong neurotoxins in addition to other effects on the environment (Smith 1990; Lehtimaki et al 1997; Paerl et al 2001). Despite the adaptability and periodic dominance of cyanobacteria, a blue-green carpet does not cover our world’s oceans. Each resource acquisition pathway has certain tradeoffs associated with it (Rastetter forthcoming; Rastetter et al 2001). For example, the formation and maintenance of heterocysts and their component parts makes nitrogen fixation an energetically costly process (Kumar et al 2010). However, this process theoretically becomes beneficial when nitrate and ammonia are so rare that the organism will save energy by fixing its own nitrogen rather than exploit the small amount of nitrogen available from its surroundings (Vitousek et al 2002; Rastetter et al 2001). Heterocysts demand energy that the organism would have otherwise dedicated to growth or reproduction. As a consequence of this redistribution of resources, changes in the productivity of cyanobacteria with and without heterocysts should indicate the relative cost of nitrogen fixation. I designed an experiment to test this concept of substitutable resource optimization in the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria Anabaena. My primary goal was to understand how biomass and productivity changed over a nutrient gradient and connect any variation in biomass back to tradeoffs associated with heterocyst formation. Aldea et al (2008) pointed out that heterocysts depend heavily on their neighboring cells for carbon and provide nitrogen in return. This is not unlike the symbiosis between nitrogen fixing Rhizobium and legumes in which the energetic demands of the bacteria actually restrict the growth of the plant (Ryle et al 1979). My hypothesis was that the presence of heterocysts would cause a significant reduction in productivity because of the added costs associated with nitrogen fixation. I wanted to better understand what nutrient concentrations trigger heterocyst formation as well as the nature of the transition from possessing heterocysts to lacking them and vice versa. Ogawa and Carr (1969) found that Anabaena exposed to nitrate, ammonium, and atmospheric nitrogen formed heterocysts with different densities. They did not, however, monitor heterocyst density over a concentration gradient. Mickelson et al (1966) monitored heterocyst density over a nitrogen gradient but did not carry out the experiment until heterocysts disappeared completely. I expanded on their work by creating a large enough gradient to capture the transition to and away from the presence of heterocysts. I believed that the cost of nitrogen fixation would cause the transition to take place rapidly and at a fairly low nitrogen concentration. My third and final goal was to investigate how the resource acquisition strategies implemented by the cyanobacteria would alter their environment. I did not entirely know what to expect, as this aspect of cyanobacterial life is poorly documented. Brewer and Goldman (1976) demonstrated that nitrate assimilation by phytoplankton has the capacity to increase alkalinity while nitrogen fixation does not. Gundersen and Mountain (1973) also mentioned that bicarbonate uptake by nitrifying bacteria can have a slight but significant effect on alkalinity. Many more environmental effects result from the formation of dense blooms but these are more difficult to recreate and study in culture (Pearl et al 2001). I hoped that this study would increase 3 our understanding of substitutable resource optimization in cyanobacteria and how different resource acquisition strategies alter the organism and its environment. Methods Preparing liquid culture Anabaena circinalis in liquid culture was supplied by the Connecticut Valley Biological Supply Company (model L 111LS). The cyanobacteria were sterilely transferred to four 250 mL flasks containing sterile BG11 growth solution (Stanier et al 1971) and bubbled in a growth chamber (Conviron Model No. PGW36DE) for ten days. All sterile work was done in a laminar flow hood (Labconco Model No. 3612504). All the cultures were exposed to between 27+/-5 uE of light for 16 hours per day at a temperature of 25° C. Carbon dioxide levels were slightly elevated in the chamber and fairly constant at 495 ppm. After the ten day period I chose the flask with the least contamination, determined visually and by microscope, and used it to inoculate liquid cultures that varied in the relative availability of nitrogen and phosphorus. I used a regression design to achieve the desired gradients of nitrogen and phosphorus (Table 1). I made a large batch of BG11 without adding any nitrogen, in the form of NaNO3, or phosphorus, in the form of K2HPO4. I divided this batch into 12 one litre bottles, each containing 800 mL of solution. To half of the bottles I added NaNO3 to yield approximate concentrations of 0, 6, 30, 60, 300 and 600 mg/L nitrogen from nitrate (designated as N1 through N6). A small amount of ammonium, present in ferric ammonium citrate, contributed around 0.3 mg/L of nitrogen to every