DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036 Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036 HRA Report for the Submission Plan June 2019 Habitats Regulations Assessment for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036 HRA Report for the Submission Plan Client: Eastleigh Borough Council Report No.: UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 Author: Proofed: Approved: Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv Giulia Civello BSc(Hons) MSc PIEMA Nick Pincombe BA(Hons) MSc CEnv MIEMA MCIEEM MIEMA MCIEEM Jon Cox BSc(Hons) MCIEEM Laura Legate BSc(Hons) MSc CGeol CSci FGS Giulia Civello BSc(Hons) MSc PIEMA Revision No.: Status/Comment: Date: 0 Draft for comment 25 April 2018 1 Second draft for comment 11 June 2018 2 Final draft 21 June 2018 3 Final 22 June 2018 4 Revised following representations 25 October 2018 5 Client comments 29 October 2018 6 Case law revisions 17 May 2019 7 Final for the Inspector 20 June 2019 8 Minor corrections 21 June 2019 HRA for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan: Submission stage June 2019 UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 Contents 0 Executive Summary i 0.1 Introduction i 0.2 Scope of the Assessment i 0.3 Impact Pathways ii 0.4 Summary of Findings ii 0.5 Conclusion iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this Report 1 1.2 The Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 1 1.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment 1 1.4 Scope and Structure of this Document 2 2 Methodology 5 2.1 Good Practice Guidance 5 2.2 Screening for Likely Significant Effects 6 2.3 The Appropriate Assessment Stage 7 2.4 Counteracting Measures 8 2.5 In Combination Effects 9 3 European Sites, Qualifying Features and Conservation Objectives 11 3.1 European Sites within the Scope of the Assessment 11 3.2 Special Areas of Conservation 15 3.3 Special Protection Areas 16 3.4 Ramsar Sites 19 3.5 Conservation Objectives for SAC and SPA 20 3.6 Conservation Objectives for Ramsar Sites 22 3.7 Condition Status 22 4 European Site Characterisation 25 4.1 SPA Bird Populations and Ecology 25 4.2 Solent and Dorset Coast pSPA 37 HRA for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan: Submission stage June 2019 UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 4.3 Qualifying Species of Special Areas of Conservation 39 4.4 Qualifying Habitats of Special Areas of Conservation 43 5 The Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 51 5.1 Introduction 51 5.2 Key Policy Proposals: EBLP Submission Version 51 5.3 Incorporated Mitigation Measures 52 6 Identifying Impact Pathways 59 6.1 Introduction 59 6.2 Atmospheric Pollution 59 6.3 Coastal Squeeze 74 6.4 Disturbance: Strategic Impacts 74 6.5 Disturbance: Site Specific Impacts (Noise and Vibration) 84 6.6 Hydrological Impacts: Strategic Growth Option 89 6.7 Land outside European Site Boundaries: Solent European Sites 99 6.8 Impacts on Otter outside European Site Boundaries 101 6.9 Non-native Species and Site-specific Hydrological Impacts 103 6.10 Water Abstraction 111 6.11 Water Pollution 118 6.12 Bridging the River Itchen SAC 127 6.13 Solent & Dorset Coast pSPA 129 7 Appropriate Assessment 131 7.1 Introduction 131 7.2 River Itchen SAC 131 7.3 Solent Maritime SAC 152 7.4 New Forest SPA 155 7.5 Solent & Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar 156 8 Mitigation Strategy 159 8.1 Introduction 159 8.2 Disturbance: Strategic Impacts 159 8.3 Noise and Vibration 160 8.4 Hydrological Impacts: Strategic Growth Option 160 8.5 Impacts on Otter outside European Site Boundaries 162 HRA for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan: Submission stage June 2019 UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 8.6 Non-native Species and Site-specific Hydrological Impacts 163 8.7 Water Abstraction 164 8.8 Water Pollution 165 9 Determining Adverse Effects on Integrity 167 9.1 Introduction 167 9.2 River Itchen SAC 168 9.3 Solent Maritime SAC 169 9.4 New Forest SPA 169 9.5 Solent & Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar 170 10 Summary and Conclusions 173 10.1 Summary of Findings 173 10.2 Conclusion 174 References and Bibliography 175 Appendix I: Screening Matrix A Appendix II: Southern Damselfly Transects in relation to Predicted Air Pollution Contours C Appendix III: Southern Damselfly Transects in relation to Predicted Nitrogen Deposition Fine Contours G Appendix IV: Field Survey Photos K Appendix V: Response to Representations M Appendix VI: Holohan Addendum O Appendix VII: Eastleigh Nitrogen Budget P Appendix VIII: Air Quality Technical Note R Disclaimer S HRA for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan: Submission stage June 2019 UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 List of Tables and Figures Table 2.1: Stages of HRA in guidance from Tyldesley & Chapman (2013) & DEFRA (2012) 5 Table 2.2: Screening categories (Source: Tyldesley & Chapman, 2013) 6 Table 3.1: European site qualifying features 13 Table 3.2: Conservation objectives for SAC and SPA 21 Table 4.1: WeBS Core Count data for Dark-bellied Brent Goose 26 Table 4.2: WeBS Core Count data for Black-tailed Godwit 27 Table 4.3: WeBS Core Count data for Common Tern 29 Table 4.4: WeBS Core Count data for Mediterranean Gull 31 Table 4.5: Distribution of Nightjars within SPA in Britain (JNCC, 2001) 33 Table 4.6: Distribution of Woodlarks within SPA in Britain (JNCC, 2001) 34 Table 4.7: Distribution of Dartford Warblers within SPA in Britain (JNCC, 2001) 36 Table 4.8: Distribution of Hen Harriers within SPA in Britain (JNCC, 2001) 37 Table 4.9: Summary of breeding populations of Sandwich tern within SPAs contributing to the foraging population of the Solent & Dorset Coast pSPA 38 Table 4.10: Summary of breeding populations of common tern within SPAs contributing to the foraging population of the Solent & Dorset Coast pSPA 38 Table 4.11: Summary of breeding populations of little tern within SPAs contributing to the foraging population of the Solent & Dorset Coast pSPA 39 Table 5.1: Incorporated mitigation measures 52 Table 6.1: Critical loads for N deposition in Fen, Marsh and Swamp 62 Table 6.2: Critical Levels for Ammonia within Fen, Marsh and Swamp habitats 67 Table 6.3: Critical loads for N deposition in Coastal Saltmarsh 68 Table 6.4: Proposed allocations falling within 5.6km Solent mitigation zone 76 Table 6.5: Proposed allocations falling with noise & vibration zones of influence 87 Table 6.6: Proposed allocations hydrologically connected with River Itchen SAC / Solent Maritime SAC 109 Table 6.7: WFD classifications for river, transitional and coastal water bodies (2015 Cycle) (Source: Amec Foster Wheeler, 2018): Eastleigh borough 120 Table 6.8: Summary of growth pressures on WWTW serving Eastleigh borough (Source: Amec Foster Wheeler, 2018) 125 Table 6.9: Eastleigh Borough Local Plan nitrogen budget 126 HRA for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan: Submission stage June 2019 UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 Table 7.1: Length of southern damselfly transects within the 1% threshold contour and >15kg/ha/year (NDep in combination using the ST traffic model) 136 Table 7.2: Population of southern damselfly associated with survey transects within impacted areas of the Itchen Valley. Transects at Ashtrim Nursery, Morris’ Land and Dunford’s Land, Bishopstoke, are outside of the SAC boundary 137 Table 7.3: Assessment against the River Itchen SAC conservation objectives 142 Figure 1.1: Local Plan Key Diagram 3 Figure 3.1: European sites 12 Figure 3.2: SSSI condition status 23 Figure 5.1: Proposed allocations (north-west) 54 Figure 5.2: Proposed allocations (north-east) 55 Figure 5.3: Proposed allocations (mid) 56 Figure 5.4: Proposed allocations (south) 57 Figure 6.1: Ammonia concentrations resulting from traffic modelling within Eastleigh Borough (Ammonia absolute change) 66 Figure 6.2: Solent Maritime nitrogen deposition, absolute changes in-combination and total nitrogen deposition (Defra model): M27 / A27 71 Figure 6.3: Solent Maritime nitrogen deposition, absolute changes in-combination and total nitrogen deposition (sensitivity test): M27 / A27 71 Figure 6.4: Solent Maritime nitrogen deposition, absolute changes in-combination and total Ndep (sensitivity test): M27 / A27, shown with European site boundaries 72 Figure 6.5: Solent Maritime nitrogen deposition, in-combination, total Ndep (sensitivity test): M27 / A27, shown with vegetation and European site boundaries 73 Figure 6.6: Proposed allocations falling within 5.6km Solent mitigation zone 78 Figure 6.7: Strategic Growth Option catchment overview (JBA, 2018) 91 Figure 6.8: Water environment constraints plan (JBA, 2018) 96 Figure 6.9: Proposed allocations affecting Brent goose & wader sites 102 Figure 6.10: Strategic otter corridors linking the River Itchen SAC with adjacent river catchments 104 Figure 6.11: Hampshire South Baseline Supply Demand Balance Dry Year Minimum Deployable Output (MDO) 114 Figure 6.12: Hampshire South Baseline Supply Demand Balance Dry Year Critical Period Planning Scenario (PDO) 114 Figure 6.13: Hampshire South Final Planning Supply Demand Balance Dry Year Minimum Deployable Output (MDO) 117 HRA for the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan: Submission stage June 2019 UE0247HRA- Eastleigh LP_8_190621 Figure 6.14: Hampshire South Final Planning Supply Demand Supply Demand Balance Dry Year Critical Period Planning Scenario (PDO) 117 Figure 6.15: Wastewater treatment catchments in Eastleigh borough 124 Figure 6.16: Cascade upstream of the bridge at Highbridge 128 Figure 6.17: Itchen Navigation downstream of the bridge at Highbridge looking downstream from east bank 130 Figure 6.18: Itchen Navigation downstream of the bridge at Highbridge looking upstream under the bridge from east bank. Note the absence of marginal and emergent vegetation 130 Figure 7.1: River Itchen nitrogen deposition, absolute changes in-combination and total nitrogen deposition (Defra model) 132 Figure 7.2: River Itchen nitrogen deposition, absolute changes in-combination and total nitrogen deposition (ST model) 133 Figure 7.3: Distribution of southern damselfly transects in relation to NDep 15kg/ha/yr critical load for Rich Fen and 1% exceedance contour in the lower Itchen Valley.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Item 8 Appendix 1
    ITEM 8 – Appendix 1 PUSH Green Infrastructure Strategy 2017 Appendix 1: Table of responses to January 2017 consultation PUSH GI Steering Group Authority (Officer) Comment Response Gosport Borough Council Page 12, Position Statement G1: Green Infrastructure, Para 2: No change - The wording of Position Statement G1 is (Jayson Grygiel) Change 2016 to 2017 taken from the published PUSH Spatial Position Statement. 2.3.4 (p13): May be worth mentioning that the public-facing brand for the SRMP work is now known as Bird Aware Solent. Agreed – appropriate text in para 2.3.3 added. Website is currently being prepared. Figure 5, p32: The Solent and Dorset Coast potential SPA (pSPA) is also applicable. pSPAs are given the same protection as Agreed – Will be added to figure 5 map. European sites (see para 118 of the NPPF). Appendix 4, pp58 and 59: Add – “Alver Valley Country Park Strategy (2014) Agreed – text added. Large parts of the Alver Valley have been used for gravel extraction and landfill operations. Subsequent restoration works have largely been completed and the area now encompasses a great diversity of habitats and landscapes including a range of wetlands, woodlands and grasslands. Gosport Borough Council has prepared a strategy for the Alver Valley Country Park which identifies issues that need to be addressed and key proposals to be implemented. Since the publication of the strategy a number of projects have been undertaken with funding from both PUSH and the Government‟s Local Growth Funding through the Solent LEP. There are still a number of initiatives that need to be completed to fully establish the site as an accredited35 Country Park.
    [Show full text]
  • South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District
    South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East river basin district March 2016 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1 Sub-areas in the South East river basin district .............................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Flood Risk Areas ......................................................................................................................... 9 Management catchments ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk for the Brighton and Hove Flood Risk Area..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using High-Frequency Phosphorus Monitoring for Water Quality Management: a Case Study of the Upper River Itchen, UK
    Environ Monit Assess (2020) 192:184 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0 Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK Gary R. Fones & Adil Bakir & Janina Gray & Lauren Mattingley & Nick Measham & Paul Knight & Michael J. Bowes & Richard Greenwood & Graham A. Mills Received: 16 July 2019 /Accepted: 5 February 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in distinct locations in the upper River Itchen (Hampshire, riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute UK) between May 2016 and June 2017 to identify the to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to main P species (including filterable reactive phosphorus, be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used total filterable phosphorus, total phosphorus and total par- high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five ticulate phosphorus) present and how these varied tempo- rally. Our filterable reactive phosphorus (considered the biologically available fraction) data were compared with Electronic supplementary material The online version of this the available Environment Agency total reactive phospho- article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. rus (TRP) values over the same sampling period. Over the trial, the profiles of the P fractions were complex; the : G. R. Fones (*) A. Bakir major fraction was total particulate phosphorus with the School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, mean percentage value ranging between 69 and 82% of University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, UK the total P present. Sources were likely to be attributable to e-mail: [email protected] wash off from agricultural activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Streams, Ditches and Wetlands in the Chichester District. by Dr
    Streams, Ditches and Wetlands in the Chichester District. By Dr. Carolyn Cobbold, BSc Mech Eng., FRSA Richard C J Pratt, BA(Hons), PGCE, MSc (Arch), FRGS Despite the ‘duty of cooperation’ set out in the National Planning Policy Framework1, there is mounting evidence that aspects of the failure to deliver actual cooperation have been overlooked in the recent White Paper2. Within the subregion surrounding the Solent, it is increasingly apparent that the development pressures are such that we risk losing sight of the natural features that underscore not only the attractiveness of the area but also the area’s natural health itself. This paper seeks to focus on the aquatic connections which maintain the sub-region’s biological health, connections which are currently threatened by overdevelopment. The waters of this sub-region sustain not only the viability of natural habitat but also the human economy of employment, tourism, recreation, leisure, and livelihoods. All are at risk. The paper is a plea for greater cooperation across the administrative boundaries of specifically the eastern Solent area. The paper is divided in the following way. 1. Highlands and Lowlands in our estimation of worth 2. The Flow of Water from Downs to Sea 3. Wetlands and Their Global Significance 4. Farmland and Fishing 5. 2011-2013: Medmerry Realignment Scheme 6. The Protection and Enhancement of Natural Capital in The Land ‘In Between’ 7. The Challenge to Species in The District’s Wildlife Corridors 8. Water Quality 9. Habitat Protection and Enhancement at the Sub-Regional Level 10. The policy restraints on the destruction of natural capital 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Ebook.Pmd
    Other ebooks in the series Published by: ENGLAND Travel Publishing Ltd Bedfordshire Berkshire Airport Business Centre, 10 Thornbury Road, Buckinghamshire Cambridgeshire Estover, Plymouth PL6 7PP Cheshire Cornwall ISBN13 9781907462160 Cumbria Derbyshire Devon Dorset Durham East Sussex East Yorkshire Essex © Travel Publishing Ltd Gloucestershire Hampshire Herefordshire Hertfordshire Isle of Man Isle of Wight Kent First Published: 1990 Second Edition: 1994 Leicestershire & Rutland Lancashire Third Edition: 1997 Fourth Edition: 1999 Lincolnshire Merseyside & Manchester Fifth Edition: 2001 Sixth Edition: 2003 Norfolk Northamptonshire Seventh Edition: 2005 Eighth Edition: 2009 Northumberland Ninth Edition: 2011 North Yorkshire Nottinghamshire Oxfordshire Shropshire Somerset South Yorkshire Staffordshire Suffolk Please Note: Surrey Tyne and Wear Warwickshire & W Midlands All advertisements in this publication have been accepted in West Sussex good faith by Travel Publishing. West Yorkshire Wiltshire Worcestershire All information is included by the publishers in good faith and WALES is believed to be correct at the time of going to press. No Anglesey and North Coast responsibility can be accepted for errors. North Wales Borderlands Carmarthenshire Ceredigion Editors: Hilary Weston and Jackie Staddon Gower & Heritage Coast Monmouthshire North Powys Pembrokeshire Snowdonia & Lleyn Peninsula Cover Photo: Lymington Quay South Powys © ian badley/ Alamy SCOTLAND Argyll Text Photos: See page 72 Ayrshire & Arran The Borders Dumfries & Galloway Edinburgh and The Lothians Fife Glasgow & West Central This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not by Highlands Inner Hebrides way of trade or otherwise be lent, re-sold, hired out, or North East Scotland otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in Orkney and Shetland any form of binding or cover other than that which it is Perthshire, Angus & Kinross published and without similar condition including this Stirling and Clackmannan Western Isles condition being imposed on the subsequent purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Hamble-Le- Rice Parish Council AGENDA
    Hamble-le- Rice Parish Council Memorial Hall, High Street, Hamble-le-Rice, Southampton SO31 4JE 02380453422 [email protected] A meeting of the Parish Council will be held on Monday 13 March 2017 at Roy Underdown Pavilion, Baron Road, Hamble-le-Rice at 7.00pm. AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. Declaration of interest and approved dispensations 3. To approve minutes of the Full Council Meeting 27th February 2017 4. Public session Community and Partnership 5. Presentation on the new Community facility at the former Barclays Bank by Matt Blyth, Eastleigh Borough Council. 6. Planning applications F/17/79951 Single storey rear extension, first floor terrace, raised patio to rear DEL and alterations to elevation 14 Oakwood Way, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4HJ F/17/80052 Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension, conversion DEL of roof space to provide habitable accommodation and alterations to fenestration 2 Emmons Close, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4QF C/17/80102 Erection of 1.5m high wall to site entrance DEL 16 Crowsport, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4HG T/17/80104 Fell 1no. Beech, 1no. Holm Oak and 1no. Lawson Cypress to rear DEL 6 Copse Lane, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4QH 7. Playing Pitch strategy – Response Finance 8. Audit report(s) – reports attached 9. Annual review of Financial Regulations – report attached 10. Refunds policy - verbal report 11. Member training – verbal update 12. Budget monitoring – report attached Update reports on: 13. 26/52/16 Coronation Parade Improvements 14. 52/2/15 Hamble Lifeboat toilets 15. 477/111/16 CPF Storage Building Project 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the County of Hampshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2004 Sheet 3 of 3
    Map 5 Eastleigh Borough. Bishopstoke and Fair Oak, Eastleigh East and Eastleigh West divisions. School WINCHESTER COLDEN COMMON CP CHANDLER'S FORD Created by the Ordnance Survey DOWNLANDS COLDEN COMMON AND TWYFORD WARD Boundaries Section, Southampton, SO16 4GU. n ELECTORAL ELECTORAL DIVISION o ti Tel: 023 8030 5092 Fax: 023 8079 2035 a ig v DIVISION BISHOPS WALTHAM (20) a N © Crown Copyright 2004 n e (72) ELECTORAL DIVISION h tc I e h OTTERBOURNE CP (69) T HILTINGBURY EAST COMPTON AND OTTERBOURNE Fisher's Pond WARD Only Parishes whose Warding has been WARD altered by this Order have been coloured. hen r Itc Rive CHANDLER'S FORD EAST WARD STOKE COMMON EASTLEIGH NORTH Crestwood Community School and Centre WARD BISHOPSTOKE NORTH WEST PARISH WARD Shakespeare Crowdhill County Junior School LO NGMEAD AVENUE D A O R H C R U H C DRIVE ST WE E A S T D Hampshire R I V Fire EASTLEIGH EAST E Brigade HQ Bakery ELECTORAL DIVISION (21) Recreation Ground BISHOPSTOKE WEST FAIR OAK AND H WARD AM HORTON HEATH WARD ILT ON ROA D S BISHOPSTOKE AND FAIR OAK A EASTLEIGH N D Y D A L ELECTORAL DIVISION A O BISHOPSTOKE CP N R E S R BISHOPSTOKE E (18) Y A S FAIR OAK AND T HORTON HEATH CP h e Barton Park I t c E Industrial Estate h N e Schools A L n Y EASTLEIGH CENTRAL N D a N A v S i WARD g a t i o n BISHOPSTOKE CENTRAL BISHOPSTOKE EAST PARISH WARD F PARISH WARD AIR F O AIRO AK AK RO ROA AD D EASTLEIGH WEST BISHOPSTOKE EAST WARD ELECTORAL DIVISION (22) R i v e r I t c h e n Barton Peveril College 118000m Scale : 1cm = 0.09218 km SU41NE EASTLEIGH SOUTH 4 Grid interval is 1km 4 6 WARD 0 0 0 m KEY DISTRICT BOUNDARY ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARYLakeside Country Park WARD BOUNDARY WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH OTHER BOUNDARIES Southampton Itchen Valley International Airport Country Park MAP REFERRED TO IN THE COUNTY OF HAMPSHIRE WEST END AND HEDGE END GRANGE PARK ELECTORAL DIVISION (ELECTORAL CHANGES) ORDER 2004 SHEET 3 OF 3 WEST END CP (24) WEST END NORTH WARD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
    [Show full text]
  • Final Green Infrastructure Strategy - Appendices June 2010 PUSH GI Strategy Appendices Adopted June 10
    Final Green Infrastructure Strategy - Appendices June 2010 PUSH_GI_Strategy_Appendices_Adopted_June_10 UE Associates Ltd © 2010 Final Green Infrastructure Strategy - Appendices June 2010 PUSH_GI_Strategy_Appendices_Adopted_June_10 This page is intentionally blank. UE Associates Ltd © 2010 Final Green Infrastructure Strategy - Appendix A June 2010 PUSH_GI_Strategy_Appendices_Adopted_June_10 Appendix A: Planning – National Planning Policy and SE Plan Policies UE Associates Ltd © 2010 A-1 Final Green Infrastructure Strategy - Appendix A June 2010 PUSH_GI_Strategy_Appendices_Adopted_June_10 This page is intentionally blank. UE Associates Ltd © 2010 A-2 Final Green Infrastructure Strategy - Appendix A June 2010 PUSH_GI_Strategy_Appendices_Adopted_June_10 Appendix A: Planning – National Planning Policy and SE Plan Policies This Appendix provides details about national Planning Policy Guidance relevant to green infrastructure and regional planning policies in the South East Plan (2009) which are relevant to green infrastructure. Table A.1: National planning policy documents relevant to green infrastructure Planning Policy Statement on Eco-towns – supplement to PPS1 Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change - Supplement to PPS 1 Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning for Town Centres Planning Policy Statement 7: Sustainable Development in Rural Areas Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity and Geological Conservation Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the Context 11
    PART 2: SETTING THE CONTEXT 11. SITE ANALYSIS 11.1 Introduction 142 11.2 Planning context 142 11.3 Site location 144 11.4 Topography, hydrology & geology 148 11.5 Landscape & visual character 152 11.6 Existing landscape features & green infrastructure 154 11.7 Existing movement network 156 11.8 Existing facilities 158 11.9 Historic environment 160 11.10 Existing utilities and infrastructure 161 11.11 Site analysis 163 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Planning context This section outlines the physical site features and issues The extensive planning context for Welborne is set out in members of the public, and a set of high level development that have influenced and shaped the masterplanning and the Planning Statement which accompanies this DAS and principles. Policy CS13 also stipulates that an Area Action design process, primarily within the site’s red line boundary, is submitted as part of this OPA. As such, this section only Plan (subsequently the Welborne Plan) will be produced but with reference to any contextual issues and features seeks to provide an overview of the key planning documents to guide planning permission for between 6,500-7,500 outside of it that have bearing on the design response. which have shaped our proposals in terms of their design dwellings. and access. These include strategic policies, development The topics that are covered in this chapter are as follows: management policies and other material considerations. Fareham Local Plan Part 3: The Welborne Plan (2015) ■ Planning context; The Development Plan This entire part of the Local Plan is focused on the North ■ Site location; The Fareham Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (2011) Fareham SDA, which was subsequently named the Welborne provides the strategic direction for the site and provided ■ Topography, hydrology and geology; Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034)
    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034) Adopted March 2017 (Updated July 2018) South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy 2017 - 2034 Contents Figure i: South Hampshire part of the PUSH Sub-Region: ......................................................................... 1 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background and Purpose of the South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy ........................... 2 1.2 The Benefits of a Green Infrastructure Approach ......................................................................... 5 2. Drivers for a strategic GI approach ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 National Planning Policy ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2 25 Year Environment Plan ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3 PUSH Spatial Position Statement 2016 ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Solent, New Forest and River Itchen European Protected Sites ................................................... 17 2.5 Protected Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 19 3. A GI Strategy for South Hampshire ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]