A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements TR010044 Volume 6 Volume 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendix 6.7: Archaeological Evaluation Trenching Phase 2 Planning Act 2008 Regulation 5(2)(a) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 26 February 2021 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Environmental Statement – Appendix 6.7: Archaeological Evaluation Trenching Phase 2 Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Development Consent Order 202[ ] Appendix 6.7: Archaeological Evaluation Trenching Phase 2 Regulation Reference: APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR 010044 Reference Application Document Reference TR010044/APP/6.3 Author A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 26 February 2021 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010044 Application Document Ref: TR010044/APP/6.3 Written Scheme of Investigation for archaeological trial trench evaluation along the proposed route of the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvement Scheme Phase 2 April 2020 Authors: Adam Douthwaite and Gary Brogan Illustrator: Olly Dindol MOLA Northampton 2020 MOLA Project Manager: Gary Brogan Kent House NGR: TL 515468 255438 to TL 529651 260657 30 Billing Road Accession Number: BEDFM.2019.41/ECB6150 Northampton NN1 5DQ 01604 809 800 www.mola.org.uk [email protected] Written Scheme of Investigation for archaeological trial trench evaluation along the proposed route of the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvement Scheme Phase 2 April 2020 Quality control and sign off: Issue Date Checked by: Verified by: Approved by: Reason for Issue: No. approved: 1 22/04/2020 Gary Brogan Rob Atkins Gary Brogan Draft for AECOM review 2 23/04/2020 Gary Brogan Rob Atkins Gary Brogan Incorporates AECOM comments Authors: Adam Douthwaite and Gary Brogan Illustrator: Olly Dindol MOLA Northampton 2020 MOLA Kent House 30 Billing Road Northampton NN1 5DQ 01604 809 800 www.mola.org.uk MOLA Northampton is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales with company registration number 8727508 and charity registration number 1155198. Registered office: Mortimer Wheeler House, 46 Eagle Wharf Road, London N1 7ED. Written Scheme of Investigation for archaeological trial trench evaluation along the proposed route of the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvement Scheme: Phase 2 SITE NAME: A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvement Scheme NATIONAL GRID REF: TL 515468 255438 (Black Cat) to TL 529651 260657 (Caxton Gibbet) CLIENTS: Skanska on behalf of Highways England DATE: April 2020 EVENT/ACCESSION NUMBER: BEDFM 2019.41 (BEDFORD BOROUGH and CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE) ECB6150 (CAMBS) CONTRACTOR: MOLA Kent House 30 Billing Road Northampton NN1 5PN MOLA Page 1 of 61 A428 BLACK CAT TO CAXTON GIBBET IMPROVEMENT SCHEME 1 INTRODUCTION Project Background 1.1 Highways England plans to improve the A428 trunk road between The Black Cat roundabout in Bedfordshire and Caxton Gibbet, in Cambridgeshire. These works are known as the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvement Scheme. In support of these proposals a staged programme of archaeological investigations has been commissioned. 1.2 An overarching programme for the archaeological works is set out by the Design Consultant in the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Scope of Works (AECOM 2020a) which follows works detailed in the Design Brief for Archaeological Evaluation (Cambridgeshire County Council 2019). The stages of investigations are set out in these documents. • A desk-based assessment as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment. This has been carried out by AECOM, the Design Consultants (AECOM 2020b). • A geophysical survey of the proposed route. This has been undertaken by MOLA Headland Infrastructure in 2019 to 2020 and was carried out in three phases (MHI 2020a and b). • Trial Trench evaluation across the proposed route and associated works, such as temporary and permanent works, including (but not exclusively) borrow pits, soil storage areas, compounds and flood alleviation works. 1.3 This Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) describes the works associated with Phase 2 of the trial trench evaluation and will test anomalies and target blank areas of land within the scheme footprint that were subject to Phase 2 of the geophysical survey (Fig 1; Figs 8-12). The WSI has also been produced in accordance with current best archaeological practice as defined in the Chartered Institute for Archaeology’s Code of Conduct (CIfA 2019) and Standards and Guidance documents (CIfA 2014a, b and c) and conforms to Management of Research Projects in the Historic Environment (MoRPHE) (HE 2015a). 1.4 MOLA (Museum of London Archaeology) has been commissioned by the Main Contractor, Skanska, on behalf of Highways England, as Archaeological Contractors to carry out the Phase 2 archaeological trial trenching. MOLA undertook the Phase 1 trial trench evaluation between January and April 2020. MOLA will, if required, sub-contract part of the archaeological work to the Cambridge Archaeological Unit (CAU) who will provide archaeological labour during the fieldwork and some specialist support during the post- excavation phase (see 7.8). 1.5 The scheme red line boundary as illustrated (Figs 1-12) is out of date and does not reflect recent changes. Reason for Trial Trenching 1.6 The Proposed Scheme is a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP). Due to the high archaeological potential of the landscape, information on the potential impact of the Proposed Scheme on the archaeological remains is required to be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate to inform the Development Consent Order (DCO) application process, in line with the policies set out in Highways England’s Design Manual for Road and Bridges (DRMB) (Highways England 2019a). The results of the archaeological evaluation works are required to be completed in advance of the Development Consent Order (DCO) confirmation, in order to confirm the scope of archaeological mitigation excavations that will be required prior to release of archaeological priority areas for construction. MOLA Page 2 of 61 A428 BLACK CAT TO CAXTON GIBBET IMPROVEMENT SCHEME 1.7 The results of the archaeological evaluation works are required to be completed in advance of the DCO being made, in order to confirm the scope of archaeological mitigation excavations that will be required prior to release of archaeological priority areas for construction. The archaeological evaluation works are programmed to be undertaken in three phases; however, the extent of information available at DCO application submission will be dependent on land access availability and crop cycles. Wherever possible, the results of the evaluation trenching will be used to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment process, so that likely significant effects can be identified and mitigation measures agreed. Should the assessment be limited by incomplete or unavailable data, other information sources (e.g. results of other evaluation methods and research presented in the desk-based assessment) will be used to undertake and report a ‘worst case’ assessment on archaeology. Where the results of the evaluation trenching are only available post submission of the DCO application, these results and any required updates to the impact assessment will be submitted to the DCO Examination as further information. 1.8 This information will also be shared with Cambridge County Council, Central Bedfordshire and Bedford Borough Councils to allow their archaeological specialists to comment and submit representations to the DCO examination to inform the decision making process. In order to provide this information an archaeological evaluation of the route is necessary. 2 BACKGROUND Location (Fig 1) 2.1 The proposed development is a 17km road improvement scheme, 12km of which is located in Cambridgeshire and 5km in Bedfordshire (partly in both Central Bedfordshire and Bedford Borough), and it will create a new duel carriageway from the A1/A421 Black Cat Junction to the A428/A1198 Caxton Gibbet Junction. 2.2 The proposed alignment runs west to east, crossing the River Great Ouse, Barford Road and the East Coast Main Line (ECML) railway, where it turns to the north-east. The route crosses Potton Road and the B1046 to the east of Little Barford Power Station and St Neots, before connecting with the existing A428 at the B1428 Cambridge Road junction. From here it is aligned approximately west to east and situated to the north of, and roughly parallel to, the existing A428. It passes to the north of the villages of Croxton and Eltisley, finally terminating to the east of the existing Caxton Gibbet Roundabout on the existing A428. Topography (Fig 2) 2.3 The scheme footprint passes through a number of distinct topographical areas. At the western end of the route is dominated by the Great Ouse valley, and the confluences of the River Great Ouse, the River Ivel, the Begwary Brook, and the Stone Brook. Here the route is at the lowest point at approximately 20m above Ordnance Datum (aOD). To the north-east, the route climbs a ridge of higher ground, located at c50m aOD, before dropping into the valley of the Abbotsley/Hen and Wintringham Brooks, which are further tributaries of the River Great Ouse that confluence in the centre of St Neots. To the east of Wintringham Brook the route follows a ridge of high ground, at approximately 60-65m aOD where it passes to the north of the villages of Croxton and Eltisley. These watercourses have directly influenced the siting of settlement activity throughout all periods, including late Saxon villages and medieval moated manors on the periphery of St Neots. MOLA Page 4 of 61 A428 BLACK CAT TO CAXTON GIBBET IMPROVEMENT SCHEME Geology (Fig 3) 2.4 The solid geology of the western and central sections of the scheme, where it crosses the River Great Ouse and climbs the eastern valley side, is mudstone of the Jurassic Age (Kellaways and Oxford Clay formations).
Recommended publications
  • Bedfordshire and Its Boundaries with Buckinghamshire and Cambridge- Shire
    CoPV ort No. 566 B evtew_oiJNpn-Metropol itan Counties COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHR AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH : BUCKINGHAMSH R t AND CAMBRIDGESHIR LOCAL GOVERNlfEST BOUNDARY COMMISSION f'OIt ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE PRICS FSVA Members Professor G E Cherry BA FRTPI PRICE Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT HON NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AND CAMBRIDGE- SHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Bedfordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under section 48{1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the principal local authorities, and parishes, in Bedfordshire and in the surrounding counties of Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Northamptonshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, water authorities, and electricity and gas boards which might have an interest, as well as to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested, in co-operation as necessary with the other local authorities, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
    FFerr A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report March 2016 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Project no: B2074900 Document title: Option Assessment Report Document No.: B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 Revision: 0 Date: 17 March 2016 Client name: Highways England Client no: Project manager: Simon Beaney Author: Robert Benson Jacobs U.K. Limited 1180 Eskdale Road Winnersh, Wokingham Reading RG41 5TU United Kingdom T +44 (0)118 946 7000 F +44 (0)118 946 7001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 29/01/2016 Draft for client review RB SM/DW SB 1 17/03/2016 Final RB TB SB B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 i A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of report ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Overview of assessment ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire-Care-Directory-2015.Pdf
    Cambridgeshire Adult Care and Support Services Directory 2015 River Cam Where to go for information about care and support for adults in Cambridgeshire • Home support • Specialist care • Useful contacts • Care homes In partnership with www.carechoices.co.uk www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk tfordshire Of All Ages. rvices, Home Care & Support for you Caring for Adults and Children of All Ages Across Cambridgeshire • All Personal Care, Domestic Chores and Support Services • Visits from ¼ Hour up to 24 Hour Live–In Care • Fully Flexible, Tailored Care Packages to Suit your Individual Needs Specialist Areas Include: • Physical Disabilities • Dementia Care • Degenerative Conditions • Neurological Conditions • End Of Life Care • Learning Disability Support Contact Us For a No-Obligation Assessment 0333 700 80 80 [email protected] • www.carebyus.com Care Quality Commission and Cambridgeshire County Council Accredited Members of the United Kingdom Home Care Association Contents Welcome 4 Care homes 39 Areas covered by this Directory 4 Paying for care 44 Helping you navigate around the information, Essential information 47 systems, support and services available 5 Health information services 49 Coming home from hospital 7 Other sources of information 51 Living at home 8 Care homes & care homes with nursing listings 53 Getting out and about 15 • Cambridge City 53 Do you look after someone? 19 • East Cambridgeshire 55 Worries about mental health and dementia 20 • Fenland 57 Specialist services 21 • Huntingdonshire 58 Housing options 23 • South Cambridgeshire 61 Care in your own home 25 Index 64 For extra copies of this Directory, please call Customer Services on 0345 045 5202. Cambridgeshire County Council’s distribution of this publication does not constitute their support or recommendation of any of the products or services advertised or listed within.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of a Site at Bourn, Cambridgeshire
    An archaeological desk-based assessment of a site at Bourn, Cambridgeshire. September 2012 prepared by Howard Brooks on behalf of Andrew Martin Planning CAT project ref.: 12/9a NGR: TL 341 585 (centre) Colchester Archaeological Trust Roman Circus House, Circular Road North, Colchester, Essex CO2 7GZ tel.: 07436 273304 email: [email protected] CAT Report 664 September 2012 Contents 1 Summary 2 2 What we know about archaeology in and around the proposed development site (PDS) 3 3 Archaeological sites and finds in and around the PDS 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Statutory sites: Scheduled Ancient Monument( SAM) 7 3.3 Statutory sites: Listed Buildings 8 3.4 Excavated or evaluated archaeological sites 10 3.5 Chance discoveries of archaeological material 21 3.6 Archaeological sites known as cropmarks 22 3.7 Field system and house platforms 23 3.8 Bourn airfield 25 4 Potential constraints on development 26 5 References and other sources 27 6 Glossary of terms used 29 7 Acknowledgements 29 1 An archaeological desk-based assessment of a site at Bourn, Cambridgeshire. 1 Summary This is an archaeological desk-based assessment of a proposed development site (PDS) at Bourn, Cambridgeshire. Excluding the airfield itself, there are six archaeological sites within the PDS – two ‘cropmark’ sites, two sites on which detectorists have found Roman coins and metalwork, a general reference to surviving fragments of a once more extensive medieval strip field system, and an approximate position of Roman burials (including a stone coffin). There is also a listed building within the application site (Bourn Grange). However, this will be unaffected by the proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 No. 2984 LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 2984 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The District of Huntingdonshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2002 Made ----- 2ndDecember 2002 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2), (3) and (4) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) a report dated April 2002 on its review of the district of Huntingdonshire together with its recommendations: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give eVect to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the District of Huntingdonshire (Electoral Changes) Order 2002. (2) This order, with the exception of articles 5, 6, 8 and 9, shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 6th May 2004, on 15th October 2003; (b) for all other purposes, on 6th May 2004. (3) Articles 5 and 9 shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to the election of a parish councillor for the parishes of Houghton and Wyton, and The Stukeleys to be held on 4th May 2006, on 15th October 2005; (b) for all other purposes, on 4th May 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018
    The Wildlife Trust BCN Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018 Some of this year’s highlights ___________________________________________________ 3 Chairman’s Introduction _______________________________________________________ 5 Strategic Report Our Five Year Plan: Better for Wildlife by 2020 _____________________________________ 6 Delivery: Wildlife Conservation __________________________________________________ 7 Delivery: Nene Valley Living Landscape _________________________________________________ 8 Delivery: Great Fen Living Landscape __________________________________________________ 10 Delivery: North Chilterns Chalk Living Landscape ________________________________________ 12 Delivery: Ouse Valley Living Landscape ________________________________________________ 13 Delivery: Living Landscapes we are maintaining & responsive on ____________________________ 14 Delivery: Beyond our living landscapes _________________________________________________ 16 Local Wildlife Sites _________________________________________________________________ 17 Planning __________________________________________________________________________ 17 Monitoring and Research ____________________________________________________________ 18 Local Environmental Records Centres __________________________________________________ 19 Land acquisition and disposal _______________________________________________________ 20 Land management for developers _____________________________________________________ 21 Reaching out - People Closer to Nature __________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a 2019-07-26 FINAL Cambs LA Partners A428
    Response of Cambridge City Council, Cambridgeshire County Council, the Greater Cambridge Partnership, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council to Highways England’s consultation on proposals to dual the A428 between the Black Cat and Caxton Gibbet junctions Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of key issues ............................................................................................................... 3 Ongoing work with Highways England through scheme development and delivery ..................... 6 Planning Performance Agreements ............................................................................................................. 6 Traffic Impacts ........................................................................................................................... 6 Transport modelling ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Impacts on local roads and rat-running traffic through villages .................................................................. 7 Impacts on St Neots and Little Paxton ......................................................................................................... 8 Impacts on Cambridge, and interaction with the Greater Cambridge Partnership’s transport programme ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HADDENHAM Public Transport How to Find Us All
    Angus Fire Limited Haddenham Business Park Angus Fire Ltd Pegasus Way, Haddenham Angus House, Haddenham Business Park, Pegasus Way, Haddenham, Aylesbury, HP17 8LB, UK Aylesbury HP17 8LB Tel: +44 (0)1844 293600 • Fax: +44 (0)1844 293664 Email: [email protected] • Web: www.angusfire.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1844 265000 Fax: +44 (0) 1844 265163 AllALL v VISITORSisitors pl PLEASEease rREPORTeport t TOo reception RECEPTION www.angusfire.co.uk A418 TO A508 10 AYLESBURY, LEIGHTON BUZZARD, M1 A1 N 14 A43 A5 A421 9 DUNSTABLE, M1, MILTON KEYNES, Milton A505 A422 13 10 A131 LONDON LUTON AIRPORT Keynes A6 M11 M40 9 A10 A43 STANSTED A421 A5 10 AIRPORT A4146 Stevenage Stevenage A120 A120 Braintree Luton 7 8a Bicester 8 9 Dunstable A5 D A602 Bishop’s R A41 A418 9 A131 A41 LUTON A1(M) Stortford R Y Aylesbury AIRPORT A130 B U A41 E S A418 A130 A12 AY L A41Hemel M1 4 8a HaddenHaddenhhaam A10 7 Oxford 3 Hatfield A414 Chelmsford 8 Hempstead A12 A4010 2121a 7 23 A413 20 6 25 27 Oxford High 19 Borehamwood M25 A12 A130 A418 A34 M40 5 A10 Thame Wycombe Watford M11 28 A355 M25 M1 A127 Haddenham Business Park A406 A12 4 29 3 2 C Basildon H Haddenham & 16 A40 U 1 A13 8 Thame Parkway Maidenhead A13 1 R Slough UxbridgUxbridgee LONDON 30 4 C 15 A H 8/9 M4 Dartford 1a W Reading A316 A2 1b Gravesend A A205 Y M4 10 13 HEATHROW A24 2 Chearsley Bracknell A2 1 D 11 AIRPORT A3 A23 A20 A2 Newbury 12 3 R Kingsey Cuddington A322 A232 A21 Y Haddenham 3 4 M20 A33 M25 Croydon M2 R U 4 3 4 10 A22 5 M26 B A339 Woking 9 A217 M20 M3 A3 S A331 E Basingstoke 7 M25 Sevenoaks 8 6 Maidstone L Guildford 8 A21 A26 Y 6 Dorking A22 A Farnham M23 A24 9 A26 A31 A3 GATWICK AIRPORT 10 A22 S T A N B R Y D E I R A D D E I G M W E P S E A H H G N 8 A T R 1 S Y C D U A W 4 S W R O A HADDENHAM & T U H THAME PARKWAY C STATION D R N TO S A O N S TAT I R D D R D E R M A HADDENHAM H Y T R Aylesbury A418 U Stone B Haddenham S E route for goods vehicles L Y 1 A Haddenham 1 4 miles Business Park Haddenham Haddenham & Thame Parkway 8 1 4 A A418 TO THAME, M40 JCT 8A, A40, OXFORD Give Way 2013 TM Tel: 0800 019 0027.
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements
    A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements TR010044 Volume 6 6.12 Archaeological Mitigation Strategy Planning Act 2008 Regulation 5(2)(a) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 26 February 2021 PCF XXX PRODUCT NAME | VERSION 1.0 | 25 SEPTEMBER 2013 | 5124654 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Archaeological Mitigation Strategy Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvement Scheme Development Consent Order 202[ ] Archaeological Mitigation Strategy Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010044 Reference Application Document Reference TR010044/APP/6.12 Author A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 26 February 2021 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010044 Application Document Ref: TR010044/APP/6.12 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Archaeological Mitigation Strategy Table of contents Chapter Pages 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project background 1 1.2 Overview of the document 1 1.3 Status of this document 2 1.4 The strategy of the document 2 1.5 Roles and responsibilities 2 1.6 Policy and guidance 3 1.7 Structure of document 4 2 Purpose and objectives 6 2.1 Purpose of document 6 2.2 Objectives 6 2.3 Aims of specific intervention types 7 3 Archaeological background 9 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Aerial photography and LiDAR 9 3.3 Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Technical Report
    Hertfordshire Infrastructure & Investment Strategy Transport Technical Report Appendix A – Transport Deficit Identified at 2011 J:\Bedford-Jobs\Hertfordshire County Council\49323910 HIIS - Transportation Elements\DMS\Reports\BDRP0004 HIIS Transport Final Deficit and Schemes_Final.doc November 2009 Hertfordshire Infrastructure & Investment Strategy Transport Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix A Table A 1: Broxbourne Deficit Table A 2: Dacorum Deficit Table A 3: East Herts Deficit Table A 4: Hertsmere Deficit Table A 5: North Herts Deficit Table A 6: St Albans Deficit Table A 7: Stevenage Deficit Table A 8: Three Rivers Deficit Table A 9: Watford Deficit Table A 10: Welwyn Hatfield Deficit Table A 11: Other Deficit Table A 12: Bus Network Congestion Figure A 1: Bus Deficit Map – References Figure A 2: Rail Deficit Map – References Figure A 3: Road Deficit Map – References Figure A 4: Other Deficit Map – References J:\Bedford-Jobs\Hertfordshire County Council\49323910 HIIS - Transportation Elements\DMS\Reports\BDRP0004 HIIS Transport Final Deficit and Schemes_Final.doc November 2009 Hertfordshire Infrastructure & Investment Strategy Transport Technical Report Appendix A provides details of the headline issues described in Section 4, including all elements of deficit either identified from the modelling, from other documents, or anecdotally via the local knowledge of District and County officers This section explains how Appendix A has been set up, the definitions adopted, and how to use it. The Figures are as follows. They have a common key but only certain modes apply to each, as denoted by the titles. Figure A 1 Bus: This shows the main locations of bus capacity and bus congestion (where routes are affected by general congestion – see also Table A 12) problems; Figure A 2 Rail: This shows the main locations of rail capacity problems.
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements
    A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements TR010044 Volume 6 6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 13: Road Drainage and Water Environment Planning Act 2008 Regulation 5(2)(a) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 26 February 2021 PCF XXX PRODUCT NAME | VERSION 1.0 | 25 SEPTEMBER 2013 | 5124654 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Environmental Statement - Chapter 13: Road Drainage and the Water Environment Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Development Consent Order 202[ ] Chapter 13: Road Drainage and the Water Environment Regulation Reference: Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010044 Reference Application Document Reference TR010044/APP/6.1 Author A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 26 February 2021 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010044 Application Document Ref: TR010044/APP/6.1 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Environmental Statement - Chapter 13: Road Drainage and the Water Environment Table of contents Chapter Pages 13 Road drainage and the water environment 3 13.1 Competent expert evidence 3 13.2 Legislative and policy framework 3 13.3 Assessment methodology 8 13.4 Assessment assumptions and limitations 21 13.5 Study area 25 13.6 Baseline conditions 26 13.7 Potential impacts 53 13.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 55 13.9 Assessment of significant effects 88 13.10 Monitoring 134 13.11 References 136 Table of Tables Table 13-1. Criteria to determine receptor importance......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Location ID Site Name Local Authority Camera Type
    Location ID Site Name Local Authority Camera Type Installation Date Status Speed Limit Offence Rate Average (Last 3 years) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 184 M1 Motorway, Buckinghamshire - Northbound Milton Keynes Lastec 04/11/2009 Active 70 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 185 M1 Motorway, Buckinghamshire - Southbound Milton Keynes Lastec 04/11/2009 Active 70 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 186 M1 Motorway, Buckinghamshire - Northbound Milton Keynes Lastec 04/11/2009 Active 70 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 187 M1 Motorway, Buckinghamshire - Southbound Milton Keynes Lastec 04/11/2009 Active 70 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 187 M1 Motorway, Buckinghamshire - Southbound Milton Keynes Lastec 04/11/2009 Active 70 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 191 A40 / Cassington (2) West Oxfordshire Lastec 08/03/2002 Decommissioned 60 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 194 B4034 / Buckingham Road / Bletchley (1) Milton Keynes Lastec 24/03/2002 Active 30 2.2 <2 <2 3.3 2.6 <2 2.2 <2 195 A40 / West Wycombe Road / High Wycombe (2) High Wycombe Lastec 24/03/2002 Active 30 4.1 <2 <2 <2 3.1 <2 4.5 3.7 196 Opladen Way / Bracknell (1) Bracknell Forest Lastec 07/01/2003 Decommissioned 30 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 197 B4011 / Piddington Cherwell Lastec 28/01/2004 Decommissioned 60 <2 <2 2.4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 198 A509 / Newport Pagnell By Pass / Newport Pagnell (2) Milton Keynes Lastec 28/05/2002 Decommissioned 70 <2 35.6 19.8 9.6 21.5 <2 <2 <2 199 A5 / Bletchley Milton Keynes Lastec 28/05/2002 Decommissioned 70 <2 88.0 44.5 53.0 69.7 <2 <2 <2 200 Midsummer Boulevard / Milton Keynes Milton Keynes Lastec 24/03/2002
    [Show full text]