DOCSLIB.ORG

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT for AVIATION SUPPORT SERVICES U.S. ARMY YUMA PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA CONTRACT: W9124R-13-C-0004 (Revi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT for AVIATION SUPPORT SERVICES U.S. ARMY YUMA PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA CONTRACT: W9124R-13-C-0004 (Revi PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR AVIATION SUPPORT SERVICES U.S. ARMY YUMA PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA CONTRACT: W9124R-13-C-0004 (Revision 08: 25 August 2015) Aviation Support Services Performance Work Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page C.1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................... 3 C.2.0 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................... 23 C.3.0 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY AND SERVICES........................................................ 30 C.4.0 CONTRACTOR FURNISHED PROPERTY............................................................... 31 C.5.0 REQUIREMENTS AND TASKS ................................................................................ 32 C.6.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 37 C.7.0 TECHNICAL EXHIBITS ............................................................................................. 39 Technical Exhibit 1 – Ground and Flight Operations ......................................................... 39 Technical Exhibit 2 – Aviation Maintenance ..................................................................... 41 Technical Exhibit 3 – Airfield Services .............................................................................. 54 Technical Exhibit 4 – Deleted ............................................................................................. 65 Technical Exhibit 5 – DD Form 254 Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification ................................................................... 66 Technical Exhibit 6 – Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) .................................. 68 C.8.0 ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................... 72 Attachment 1 – Applicable Documents .............................................................................. 72 Attachment 2 – Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) ...............(removed) ................ 73 Attachment 3 – Office Space .............................................................................................. 77 Attachment 4 – Deliverables ............................................................................................... 78 Page 2 of 81 Revision 08: 25 August 2015 Aviation Support Services Performance Work Statement C.1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION C.1.1 MISSION STATEMENT: C.1.1.1 Background: United States Army Yuma Proving Ground (USAYPG or more commonly known as YPG) is a Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) that conducts Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) missions for Department of Defense (DOD), commercial customers and other agencies that have formal agreements with USAYPG. USAYPG is located near the Arizona-California border, approximately 26 miles north of the City of Yuma, Arizona. USAYPG is 1,300 square miles, and has the size to allow U.S. Army weapon systems to fully exercise their capabilities without endangering the public, the isolation to avoid encroachment, the climate and vegetation to avoid environmental issues, and the sea level altitude critical for a helicopter test center. The support provided by this Performance Work Statement (PWS) to USAYPG Flight Services Division is to augment the operation, maintenance and servicing of any and all assigned aircraft at Laguna Army Airfield (LAAF) and to provide Aviation Services for aviation customers. LAAF presently operates and maintains four (4) UH-1H/V helicopters and four UH-60A helicopters as instrumentation platforms, one (1) Cessna Caravan C208B Cargo-master airplane and four (4) CASA 212 airplanes in support of the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) Military Free Fall School (MFFS). All aircraft are maintained/repaired at USAYPG LAAF by Flight Services Division. This contract is currently undergoing a transition period. YPG is divesting itself of the UH-1H/V helicopters and the Casa 212 airplanes. YPG will receive four (4) UH-60A helicopters during the transition period. As each UH-60A helicopter becomes fully mission capable and able to perform the test missions support by the UH-1H/V helicopters. A UH-1H/V helicopter shall be retired from service. Also, the Defense Logistics Agency has capitalized a major portion of the base fuel operations which will affect the Aircraft Servicing, Technical Exhibit 4 (TE4), of the PWS. TE4 shall be deleted with portions being incorporated in the Aviation Maintenance Technical Exhibit 2 (TE2). The timeline for the transition is as follows: During July 2015, YPG has received two (2) UH-60A helicopters. During the September 2015 period, YPG is scheduled to receive two UH-60A Helicopters. During the December 2015 period, USASOC/YPG will complete the divestment of four 4 CASA 212 airplanes based at YPG. During the period from October 2015 through February 2016, ATEC/YPG will complete the divestment of the four 4 UH-1H/V helicopters. Page 3 of 81 Revision 08: 25 August 2015 Aviation Support Services Performance Work Statement At end, result of the transition period, YPG will be operating and maintaining four (4) UH-60A helicopters as instrumentation platforms and one (1) Cessna Caravan C208B Cargo-master airplane. Additionally, three of the Technical Exhibits (TE) of this performance work statement (PWS) will be in a transition period from July 2015 through December 2015. YPG has been informed by U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC), Aviation Missile Command (AMCOM), USASOC and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), that changes in the type and numbers of aircraft supported (TE 1 & 2) and the refueling services (TE 4) will be affected. The over-arching guidance for the transition in regards to the aircraft is as directed by ATEC. The direction is to conduct a seamless transition of the ATEC rotary wing fleet from UH-1s to UH-60s with no impact on the conduct of our test mission. UH-1 sustainment contracts will not be terminated or de-scoped until UH-60s are received, operational for mission support, and contracts in place to maintain them. C.1.1.2 Mission: The mission of USAYPG is to support the Warfighter through test and evaluation. The management and personnel are familiar with the dynamics associated with multiple diverse testing efforts that are ongoing while operating in dispersed, often remote testing areas simultaneously. These utility helicopters perform test support and test and evaluation support requirements integral for mission accomplishment of ATEC/AMC RDT&E organizations. Mission: YPG conducts the following test support and test and evaluation missions that support development, operational test, and evaluation of a full range of Army and Joint systems (DOD) for Army Transformation: - Safety chase for hazardous flight test missions - Seeker and sensor captive flight-test support - Aerial instrumentation and video/photo support - Placement, movement, and sustainment of range instrumentation, support equipment and personnel - Test article recovery capability - Range safety, command and control capability, and environmental protection surveys - Test center, range, and facility capability orientation - Force Protection and Installation Security Capabilities - Chemical and biological agent dispersion for testing, detection, decontamination, and safe movement Recent examples of this kind of testing include next generation image/camera systems, seeker and sensor captive flight-test and supporting aerial instrumentation and video/photo support. Test teams, maintainers, and test equipment are also transported on the vast range complexes (YPG is responsible for over 1,300 square miles of land and 2,000 restricted airspace). C.1.1.3 Access to Data and Information: All records, files, documents, and working papers provided by the Government and/or generated by the Contractor during the performance of this contract shall become and remain Government property. All records shall be maintained in Page 4 of 81 Revision 08: 25 August 2015 Aviation Support Services Performance Work Statement accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 25-400-2, Army Records Management Information Systems (ARIMS) and all other pertinent directives as supplemented. Records shall be disposed of only as authorized by the Government. All records may be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and/or Privacy Act of 1974. If not previously provided to the Government, all such documents shall be turned over to the Contracting Officer (KO) or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) upon expiration or termination of the contract. The determination of whether records will be released under the FOIA and/or Privacy Act of 1974 will remain with the Government. C.1.2 SCOPE OF WORK C.1.2.1 The Contractor shall provide all labor, and services necessary to provide non-personal services required to perform aviation support for USAYPG and/or other test sites (on and off USAYPG property), throughout the United States, and elsewhere as required. Typical temporary duty sites have been Dugway Proving Ground, UT, Baltimore, MD, Phoenix, AZ, Tucson, AZ, Point Magu, CA, and China Lake, CA. Temporary duty durations have been from two days to as long as 21 days. Support shall be provided without geographic constraint on work area. The purpose of the contract is to provide administrative, management and operational support services. The Government retains and does not delegate any decision-making responsibility or authority
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3D Terrain Virtual Databases
    3D Terrain Virtual Databases MetaVR Continental US Plus Alaska and Hawaii (CONUS++) 3D Terrain MetaVR Africa, Asia, Australia & Oceania, Europe, North America, and South America 3D Terrain © 2018 MetaVR, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Reality Scene Generator, VRSG, and Metadesic are trademarks of MetaVR, Inc. Esri and ArcGIS are registered trademarks of Esri. Virtual Kismayo, Somalia Kismayo, Somalia Terrain Specifications Imagery coverage = 50 cm per-pixel Digital Globe (GeoEye-1) satellite imagery covering 1,017 sq km of the southern Somalia port city and are blended into 15 meters-per-pixel (mpp) natural view imagery Elevation coverage = SRTM void filled elevation source data. Cultural features MetaVR’s terrain is populated with hundreds of geographically specific culture models built from ground-level photographs taken on the streets of Kismayo. In addition to these geolocated and photographically specific models of buildings and other structures, several hundred other buildings were modeled by matching the structural footprints visible in the imagery as geographically typical models with culturally and architecturally accurate details. MetaVR’s virtual city contains varied terrain representative of important training environments, from a built-up port to dense urban streets to a sparsely populated outer region that includes a commercial airport. Virtual Afghanistan Village Imagery coverage The overall imagery resolution of the virtual terrain of the whole country is 2.5 meters per pixel. The terrain, built Cultural features with MetaVR’s Terrain Tools for Esri® ArcGIS®, includes an area of 1,120 sq. km of 60 cm Digital Globe commercial The village area has approximately 520 custom-built 3D structures that match the building satellite source imagery and 90 meter elevation posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 81 Monday, No. 142 July 25, 2016 Pages 48315–48686
    Vol. 81 Monday, No. 142 July 25, 2016 Pages 48315–48686 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:54 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\25JYWS.LOC 25JYWS asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER II Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Reuse in the West (2011)
    WATER REUSE IN THE WEST: STATE PROGRAMS AND INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES A Report Compiled by the Western States Water Council Nathan S. Bracken, Legal Counsel July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction …………………………………………..………………………………........... 3 State Summaries ……………………………………………………….................................. 4 Alaska ………………………………………………………………………………... 4 Arizona ………………………………………………………………………............. 4 California ……………………………………………………………………………. 11 Colorado ……………………………………………………………………………... 16 Idaho …………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Kansas ……………………………………………………………………………….. 22 Montana ……………………………………………………………………………... 26 Nebraska …………………………………………………………………………….. 27 Nevada ……………………………………………………………………………….. 29 New Mexico ………………………………………………………………………….. 30 North Dakota ………………………………………………………………………... 34 Oklahoma ……………………………………………………………………………. 35 Oregon ……………………………………………………………………………….. 36 South Dakota ………………………………………………………………………... 44 Texas …………………………………………………………………………………. 46 Utah ………………………………………………………………………………….. 50 Washington ………………………………………………………………………….. 53 Wyoming …………………………………………………………………………….. 60 Conclusion ……………………………...……………………………………………………. 62 Appendix A – Table of State Legal and Regulatory Frameworks……………………...... 64 Appendix B – State Reuse Project Inventories...……………………..………………….... 72 Arizona……………………………………………………………………………….. 73 California…………………………………………………………………………….. 80 Colorado……………………………………………………………………………… 81 Idaho………………………………………………………………………………….. 82 Nevada………………………………………………………………………………... 85 New Mexico…………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Closure of Jefferson Proving Ground, Indiana, and Realignment to Yuma
    ___ - CLOSURE OF JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND INDIANA AND REALIGNMENT TO YUMA PROVING GROUND ARIZONA li 'J.fI..,o. Pre.1. VOLUME 1 OF 2 *YE=. GI.".] Pre.1. TEXT G,...d Final ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT . I STATEMENT September 1991 - . CLOSURE OF JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDIANA AND REALIGNMENT TO WMA PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA Prepared by: Reviewed by: Louisville District U.S. Amy U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Materiel Command yy\C .- David E. Peixotto William 8. McCrath Colonel, Corps of Engineers Major General, US. Army Commander Chief of Staff Recommended for Approval by: Department of the Army Office of the Chief of Staff William A. Stofft Mabr General, General Staff Director of Management Approved by: Office of the Secretary of the Amy & 6,D& Lewis D. Walker Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Amy (Environment, Safety and Occupational Health) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CLOSURE OF JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDlANA AND REALlGNMENT TO Wh4A PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA LEAD AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S.Amy Materiel Command (AMC); TITLE OFTHE PROPOSED ACTION Closure of Jefferson Proving Ground, Indiana and Realignment to Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona AFFECTED JURISDICTION: Jefferson Proving Ground: Jefferson, Jennings and 1Zipk-y Counties, Indiana. Yuma Proving Ground: Yuma and La Paz Counties, Arizona PREPARED BY David E. Peixotto, Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Commander, US. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District, P.O. Box 59, Louisville, KY 40201-0059 REVIEWED BY: William 8. McCrath, Major General, Chief of Staff, US. Army Matericl Command RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY Williim A. Stofft, Major General, General Staff, Director of Management, Office of the Chief of Staff, Department of the Army APPROVED BY Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Yuma Proving Ground HAER No. Klr-3 Yuma County HA£Lpv Arizona
    Yuma Proving Ground HAER No. klr-3 Yuma County HA£LPv Arizona * WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Departmentt of the Interior Washington',' DC 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Yuma Proving Ground AZ-5 Location: In southwestern Arizona in Yuma County/ east of the Colorado River. Date of Construction: Established in 1942. Owner: Department of the Army Significance: Yuma Proving Ground was established during World War II by the Corps of Engineers for the testing of a new floating bridge. In 1951, the facility shifted in emphasis to become a testing center for many types of Army equipment, from tanks to water purification units, Historical Report Prepared by: William Brenner, 1984 Prepared for Transmittal by: Robie S. Lange, HABS/HAER, 1985. Yuma Proving Grounds HAER No. A2-5 page 5, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Yuma Proving Ground, part of the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, occupies 838,174 acres in southwestern Arizona. The installation conducts artillery, aircraft, and desert mobility tests, as well as various environmental tests. It contains a highly instrumented multipurpose aircraft armament testing range, vehicular test courses, amphibious testing areas, and a large gunnery range. The origins of the proving ground date from 1942, when the land it now occupies was included in Maneuver Area B of General George S. Patton's Desert Training Center, renamed the California-Arizona Maneuver Area in 1943. One of the training center's six temporary division tent camps, Camp Laguna, was located on the site of the present Mobility Test Area. In early 1943, the Army Corps of Engineers began testing a new floating bridge on the Colorado River below Imperial Dam, several miles northwest of Camp Laguna.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Military Regional Compatibility Project Policy
    This study was prepared under contract with the Arizona Department of Commerce with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Policy Guidebook Arizona military regional compatibility project July 2006 Prepared for: Prepared by: This document was prepared under contract with the Arizona Department of Commerce with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. ARIZONA MILITARY REGIONAL COMPATIBILIITY PROJECT POLICY GUIDEBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................1-1 2. OVERVIEW OF ARIZONA’S MILITARY INSTALLATIONS .....................................................................2-1 3. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY...............................................3-1 4. REVIEW OF EXISTING LEGISLATION AND GUIDANCE .................................................................................4-1 5. TRENDS AND ISSUES ...........................................................5-1 6. POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR COMPATIBLE LAND USE..................................................................... 6-1 On behalf of the Arizona Department of Commerce, sincere appreciation is extended to the dedicated staff from communities, counties and military installations across the state of Arizona who participated in the development and research of
    [Show full text]
  • KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
    KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru
    [Show full text]
  • YPG Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) 2017
    -+ INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN U.S. ARMY YUMA PROVING GROUND YUMA AND LA PAZ COUNTIES, ARIZONA Update for: Fiscal Years 2017-2022 September 2017 Prepared by U.S. Army Garrison Yuma Proving Ground Environmental Sciences Division 301 C Street Yuma Proving Ground Yuma, Arizona Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN U.S. Army Garrison Yuma Proving Ground Update for: FY 2017–2022 Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Digitally signed by GLOVER.JOHN.A.1284210391 Digitally signed by GLOVER.JOHN.A.1 DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, DRISCOLL.PATRICK. DRISCOLL.PATRICK.JOSEPH.1231990557 DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA, ou=USA, cn=GLOVER.JOHN.A.1284210391 cn=DRISCOLL.PATRICK.JOSEPH.1231990557 284210391 Date: 2017.08.09 14:50:51 -07'00' JOSEPH.1231990557 Date: 2017.08.15 15:09:26 -07'00' JOHN GLOVER PATRICK J. DRIS&OLL Acting Chief, Environmental Director, Public Works Sciences Division Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Digitally signed by Digitally signed by GONZALES.FRANCISCO.E.JR.1155703560 GONZALES.FRANCIS DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA, HALLAHAN.ROBER HALLAHAN.ROBERT.J.1229262730 cn=GONZALES.FRANCISCO.E.JR.1155703560 DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, CO.E.JR.1155703560 Date: 2017.08.17 11:34:42 -07'00' ou=USA, cn=HALLAHAN.ROBERT.J.1229262730 T.J.1229262730 Date: 2017.08.22 09:26:13 -07'00' FRANCISCO E. GONZALES, JR. ROBERT J. HALLAHAN Attorney Advisor, Office of Installation OPSEC Officer Command Judge Advocate Approved By: Digitally signed by ROGERS.GORDON.
    [Show full text]
  • IATA Airports
    IATA Codes for the United States of America N.B. To check the official, current database of IATA Codes see: http://www.iata.org/publications/Pages/code-search.aspx City State IATA Code Airport Name Web Address Aberdeen SD ABR Aberdeen Proving APG Phillips Army Air Field Grounds(Aberdeen) Abilene TX ABI Abilene DYS Dyess Air Force Base Abingdon VJI Virginia Highlands Ada ADT Ada Municipal Adak Island AK ADK Adrian ADG Lenawee County Afton AFO Afton Municipal Afton NRI Grand Lake Regional Aiken AIK Aiken Municipal Ainsworth ANW Ainsworth Municipal Akhiok AKK Akhiok Akiachak AK KKI Akiak AK AKI Akron AKC Akron Fulton International Akron AKO Colorado Plains Regional Akuton AK KQA City State IATA Code Airport Name Web Address Alakanuk AK AUK Alamogordo NM ALM Alamogordo HMN Holloman Air Force Base Alamosa CO ALS Albany OR CVO Albany NY ALB Albany OR QWY Albany GA NAB Albany NAS Albany ABY Southwest Georgia Regional Albert Lea AEL Albert Lea Municipal Albuquerque NM ABQ Aleknagik AK WKK Aleneva AED Aleneva Alexander City ALX Thomas C Russell Field Alexandria LA AEX Alexandria AXN Chandler Field Alexandria ESF Esler Regional Alexandria Bay AXB Maxson Airfield Algona AXG Algona Municipal Alice ALI Alice International Aliceville AIV George Downer Allakaket AK AET Alliance NE AIA Alma AMN Gratiot Community Alpena MI APN Alpine ALE Alpine Casparis 2 City State IATA Code Airport Name Web Address Municipal Alton/St Louis ALN St Louis Regional Altoona PA AOO Altoona–Blair County http://flyaltoona.com/ Airport Altus LTS Altus Air Force Base Altus AXS
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Field Logs
    APPENDIX A FIELD LOGS APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-1 Test Pit- 141EP001 – Orientated: West - East Length – 13 ft; Width – 3 ft; Depth – 9 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-2 Test Pit- 141EP002 – Debris in Bottom and sidewalls. Orientation: West - East Length – 35 ft; Width – 10 ft; Depth – 15 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-3 Test Pit-141EP002 – Encountered debris included glass bottles, burned paper and wood, rusted metal, decomposing aluminum, wire, ceramics, brick, plastic, ash, and pipes. Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-4 Test Pit- 141EP003 – Orientation: West - East Length – 60 ft; Width – 5 ft; Depth – 15 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-5 Test Pit- 141EP003 – Encountered debris included glass bottles and jars, metal wire, construction debris, burned wood, plastic bread wrappers. Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-6 Test Pit- 141EP004 – Debris in bottom and sidewalls Orientation: South - North Length – 25 ft; Width – 6 ft; Depth – 13 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-7 Test Pit-141EP004 – Encountered debris included glass bottles, broken glass, rusted metal, wire, burned paper and wood, and plastic. Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-8 Test Pit-141EP005 – No debris, waste, or contamination observed. Orientation: West - East Length – 12 ft; Width – 3 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-9 Test Pit-141EP006 – No debris, waste, or contamination observed. Orientation: East - West Length – 13 ft; Width – 4 ft; Depth – 10 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph – B-10 Test Pit-141EP007 – Surface debris and staining in sidewalls. Orientation: East - West Length – 13 ft; Width – 3 ft; Depth – 8 ft Appendix B – Test pits Photograph B-11 Test Pit-141EP007 – Encountered abundant surface debris and a dark grayish brown stained zone in sidewall intermixed with asphalt chunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FAA-2016-7055; Airspace Docket No
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-17558, and on FDsys.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 73 [Docket No. FAA-2016-7055; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-11] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Establishment of Restricted Area R-2306F; Yuma Proving Ground, AZ. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish restricted area R-2306F in the vicinity of Laguna Army Airfield at Yuma Proving Ground, AZ. The proposed restricted area would allow the Department of the Army to maximize the existing fixed infrastructure to support hazardous test programs and segregate these activities from non-participating aircraft at Yuma Proving Ground (YPG). These programs include ground and airborne testing of non-eye-safe lasers, high energy radars and the development of unproven weapons systems. The restricted airspace would ensure the safe testing and evaluation of these programs without impacting non-participating aircraft and the general public. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12- 140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1 (800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2016-7055 and Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-11, at the beginning of your comments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Governor's Military Facilities Task Force Report
    The Report of the Governor’s Military Facilities Task Force Executive Order 2003-18 State of Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano December 2003 The Report of the Governor’s Military Facilities Task Force FOREWORD The following final report of the Governor’s Military Facilities Task Force answers every element of Executive Order 2003-18, dated May 27, 2003. This report is the result of seven months of in-depth study, extensive research, and careful consideration of perspectives offered by many individuals and interest groups. The Task Force took special note of and reached out to local officials, installation commanders, land owners, and land developers. While not all recommendations offered to the Task Force were accepted, all received full consideration. The resulting specific recommendations reflect the following four themes: 1. Preserve and grow Arizona’s network of military installations to satisfy the long- term needs of the Department of Defense and maximize the benefit to Arizona’s economy. 2. Maximize actions at the local level. 3. Establish and sustain solid State and federal support. 4. Recognize and leverage existing statues, initiatives, and effective efforts. Although the 27 recommendations are presented in an action-oriented format, they should also be considered as offering solution sets based upon common themes. For example, recommendations numbered 2, 5, 7, 12, 26, and 27 taken together, represent a formidable set of tools to effectively deal with the private rights of landowners within the affected areas surrounding Arizona’s military installations. Absent implementation, these recommendations will be useless. Consequently, the Task Force has recommended the development of a Military Affairs Commission to aggressively pursue the full adoption of the Task Force’s recommendations.
    [Show full text]