DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissertation Zur Erlangung Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades Der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Vo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissertation Zur Erlangung Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades Der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Vo Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Jürgen Paul aus Nürnberg Würzburg 2001 THE MOUTHPARTS OF ANTS - Contents p. II - Contents General Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 A. THE MANDIBLES A.1. Review: Mandible movements in ants ................................................................. 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 Muscle fiber types of the mandible closer muscle ......................................................... 7 Muscle fiber composition reflects adaptive differences among species ........................ 8 Trap-jaw mechanism yields maximum velocity ........................................................... 12 A.2. Optimizing force and velocity: Mandible muscle fiber attachments in ants ..................................................... 15 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 16 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................. 18 Results .......................................................................................................................... 18 - Composition of the apodeme ................................................................................... 20 - Positions and attachment angles of different fiber types ......................................... 23 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 25 - Apodeme design: force and velocity require different angles of attachment .......... 25 - Muscle fiber attachment: why apodeme filaments? ................................................ 28 - Species-specific differences: filaments or direct fiber attachment? ........................ 30 Appendix ...................................................................................................................... 32 - Model 1: optimal angle of attachment to maximize power output .......................... 32 - Model 2: efficient use of head capsule volume and the mode of fiber attachment .. 33 A.3. Motor control of the mandible closer muscle in ants .................................... 35 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 36 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................. 38 - Electrophysiology .................................................................................................... 38 - Mandible movements .............................................................................................. 39 - Neuroanatomy ......................................................................................................... 40 Results .......................................................................................................................... 40 - Muscle fiber groups and motor units ....................................................................... 40 - Force and velocity of mandible movements ............................................................ 44 - Neuroanatomy ......................................................................................................... 48 Contents - p. III Discussion .................................................................................................................... 51 - Motor units and their input regions ......................................................................... 51 - Modulation and multineuronal innervation ............................................................. 53 - Force and velocity of mandible movements ............................................................ 55 B. THE LABIOMAXILLARY COMPLEX B.4. How do ants put out their tongue? ..................................................................... 57 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 58 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................. 59 - Histology ................................................................................................................. 60 - Morphometry ........................................................................................................... 60 - ATP-experiments ..................................................................................................... 60 Results .......................................................................................................................... 61 - Anatomical design ................................................................................................... 61 - Muscle morphology ................................................................................................. 65 - Glossa protraction mechanism ................................................................................ 69 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 73 - Anatomical design ................................................................................................... 73 - Non muscular movement mechanisms .................................................................... 75 B.5. Liquid food intake in ants: I. Feeding techniques and intake rates ........... 79 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 80 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................. 82 Results .......................................................................................................................... 83 - Feeding techniques .................................................................................................. 83 - Intake rates and ant size ........................................................................................... 85 - Interspecific comparison .......................................................................................... 87 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 89 - Licking and sucking ................................................................................................. 89 - Feeding technique and intake rate ........................................................................... 90 - Feeding habits and intake rate ................................................................................. 92 p. IV - Contents B.6. Liquid food intake in ants: II. Underlying mechanisms ................................ 95 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 96 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................. 97 - Scanning electron microscopy ................................................................................. 97 - Light microscopy ..................................................................................................... 97 - Morphometry ........................................................................................................... 98 Results .......................................................................................................................... 99 - Licking and sucking ................................................................................................ 99 - Glossa surface ........................................................................................................ 101 - Muscle volumes ..................................................................................................... 104 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 109 - Glossa surface ........................................................................................................ 109 - Muscle volumes ..................................................................................................... 111 - How much muscle per unit surface area? .............................................................. 112 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 115 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................................... 119 References ........................................................................................................................ 123 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 137 Danksagung ................................................................................................................ 138 Lebenslauf .................................................................................................................. 139 Publications ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Can the Bacterial Community of Atta Sexdens (Linnaeus, 1758) Tell Us About the Habitats in Which This Ant Species Evolves?
    insects Article What Can the Bacterial Community of Atta sexdens (Linnaeus, 1758) Tell Us about the Habitats in Which This Ant Species Evolves? Manuela de Oliveira Ramalho 1,2,*, Cintia Martins 3, Maria Santina Castro Morini 4 and Odair Correa Bueno 1 1 Centro de Estudos de Insetos Sociais—CEIS, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Campus Rio Claro, Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro 13506-900, SP, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Department of Entomology, Cornell University, 129 Garden Ave, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA 3 Campus Ministro Reis Velloso, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Av. São Sebastião, 2819, Parnaíba, Piauí 64202-020, Brazil; [email protected] 4 Núcleo de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, Av. Dr. Cândido Xavier de Almeida e Souza, 200, Centro Cívico, Mogi das Cruzes 08780-911, SP, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 March 2020; Accepted: 22 May 2020; Published: 28 May 2020 Abstract: Studies of bacterial communities can reveal the evolutionary significance of symbiotic interactions between hosts and their associated bacteria, as well as identify environmental factors that may influence host biology. Atta sexdens is an ant species native to Brazil that can act as an agricultural pest due to its intense behavior of cutting plants. Despite being extensively studied, certain aspects of the general biology of this species remain unclear, such as the evolutionary implications of the symbiotic relationships it forms with bacteria. Using high-throughput amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, we compared for the first time the bacterial community of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    Myrmecological News 20 25-36 Online Earlier, for print 2014 The evolution and functional morphology of trap-jaw ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fredrick J. LARABEE & Andrew V. SUAREZ Abstract We review the biology of trap-jaw ants whose highly specialized mandibles generate extreme speeds and forces for predation and defense. Trap-jaw ants are characterized by elongated, power-amplified mandibles and use a combination of latches and springs to generate some of the fastest animal movements ever recorded. Remarkably, trap jaws have evolved at least four times in three subfamilies of ants. In this review, we discuss what is currently known about the evolution, morphology, kinematics, and behavior of trap-jaw ants, with special attention to the similarities and key dif- ferences among the independent lineages. We also highlight gaps in our knowledge and provide suggestions for future research on this notable group of ants. Key words: Review, trap-jaw ants, functional morphology, biomechanics, Odontomachus, Anochetus, Myrmoteras, Dacetini. Myrmecol. News 20: 25-36 (online xxx 2014) ISSN 1994-4136 (print), ISSN 1997-3500 (online) Received 2 September 2013; revision received 17 December 2013; accepted 22 January 2014 Subject Editor: Herbert Zettel Fredrick J. Larabee (contact author), Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA; Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Andrew V. Suarez, Department of Entomology and Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, Univer- sity of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File
    Myrmecological News 19 31-41 Vienna, January 2014 Trophic ecology of tropical leaf litter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – a stable isotope * study in four types of Bornean rain forest Martin PFEIFFER, Dirk MEZGER & Jens DYCKMANS Abstract We measured δ 15N values and inferred the trophic positions of 151 ground ant species from four types of rain forests (alluvial, limestone, dipterocarp forest, and Kerangas) in Gunung Mulu National Park, in Sarawak, Malaysia. Four hypo- theses were tested: 1) Ground-foraging ants occur in all trophic levels; 2) ant subfamilies differ in their trophic status; 3) δ 15N values differ among species within genera and among genera within subfamilies; and 4) ant assemblages in differ- ent forest types differ in their trophic structure. Base-line corrected mean δ 15N values for different ant species ranged from -0.67‰ to 10.56‰ thus confirming that forest ants occupy a variety of trophic levels. Based on stable isotopes we distinguished three major trophic groups: a) species mostly feeding on hemipteran exudates and other plant-derived food resources; b) omnivorous species with mixed diet of plant and animal prey; and c) truly predacious species, in- cluding arthropod specialists. Ant subfamilies differed significantly in their trophic positions, as did many ant genera with- in subfamilies and ant species within ant genera. Several ant species exhibited dietary flexibility and differed significantly in trophic positions across forest types. Key words: Trophic position, stable isotopes, food webs, functional groups, leaf litter ants. Myrmecol. News 19: 31-41 (online 9 July 2013) ISSN 1994-4136 (print), ISSN 1997-3500 (online) Received 11 September 2012; revision received 9 April 2013; accepted 10 April 2013 Subject Editor: Nicholas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Site Selection During Colony Relocation in Yucatan Peninsula Populations of the Ponerine Ants Neoponera Villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    insects Article Nest Site Selection during Colony Relocation in Yucatan Peninsula Populations of the Ponerine Ants Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Franklin H. Rocha 1, Jean-Paul Lachaud 1,2, Yann Hénaut 1, Carmen Pozo 1 and Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud 1,* 1 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Avenida Centenario km 5.5, Chetumal 77014, Quintana Roo, Mexico; [email protected] (F.H.R.); [email protected] (J.-P.L.); [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (C.P.) 2 Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse; CNRS, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-98-3835-0440 Received: 15 January 2020; Accepted: 19 March 2020; Published: 23 March 2020 Abstract: In the Yucatan Peninsula, the ponerine ant Neoponera villosa nests almost exclusively in tank bromeliads, Aechmea bracteata. In this study, we aimed to determine the factors influencing nest site selection during nest relocation which is regularly promoted by hurricanes in this area. Using ants with and without previous experience of Ae. bracteata, we tested their preference for refuges consisting of Ae. bracteata leaves over two other bromeliads, Ae. bromeliifolia and Ananas comosus. We further evaluated bromeliad-associated traits that could influence nest site selection (form and size). Workers with and without previous contact with Ae. bracteata significantly preferred this species over others, suggesting the existence of an innate attraction to this bromeliad. However, preference was not influenced by previous contact with Ae. bracteata. Workers easily discriminated between shelters of Ae. bracteata and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Brazilian Forest Plantations
    Forests 2014, 5, 439-454; doi:10.3390/f5030439 OPEN ACCESS forests ISSN 1999-4907 www.mdpi.com/journal/forests Review An Overview of Integrated Management of Leaf-Cutting Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Brazilian Forest Plantations Ronald Zanetti 1, José Cola Zanuncio 2,*, Juliana Cristina Santos 1, Willian Lucas Paiva da Silva 1, Genésio Tamara Ribeiro 3 and Pedro Guilherme Lemes 2 1 Laboratório de Entomologia Florestal, Universidade Federal de Lavras, 37200-000, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (J.C.S.); [email protected] (W.L.P.S.) 2 Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Departamento de Ciências Florestais, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 49100-000, São Cristóvão, Sergipe State, Brazil; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-31-389-925-34; Fax: +55-31-389-929-24. Received: 18 December 2013; in revised form: 19 February 2014 / Accepted: 19 February 2014 / Published: 20 March 2014 Abstract: Brazilian forest producers have developed integrated management programs to increase the effectiveness of the control of leaf-cutting ants of the genera Atta and Acromyrmex. These measures reduced the costs and quantity of insecticides used in the plantations. Such integrated management programs are based on monitoring the ant nests, as well as the need and timing of the control methods. Chemical control employing baits is the most commonly used method, however, biological, mechanical and cultural control methods, besides plant resistance, can reduce the quantity of chemicals applied in the plantations.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Classification of Ants (Formicidae)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407452; this version posted September 4, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Taxonomic Classification of Ants (Formicidae) from Images using Deep Learning Marijn J. A. Boer1 and Rutger A. Vos1;∗ 1 Endless Forms, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, 2333 BA, Netherlands *[email protected] Abstract 1 The well-documented, species-rich, and diverse group of ants (Formicidae) are important 2 ecological bioindicators for species richness, ecosystem health, and biodiversity, but ant 3 species identification is complex and requires specific knowledge. In the past few years, 4 insect identification from images has seen increasing interest and success, with processing 5 speed improving and costs lowering. Here we propose deep learning (in the form of a 6 convolutional neural network (CNN)) to classify ants at species level using AntWeb 7 images. We used an Inception-ResNet-V2-based CNN to classify ant images, and three 8 shot types with 10,204 images for 97 species, in addition to a multi-view approach, for 9 training and testing the CNN while also testing a worker-only set and an AntWeb 10 protocol-deviant test set. Top 1 accuracy reached 62% - 81%, top 3 accuracy 80% - 92%, 11 and genus accuracy 79% - 95% on species classification for different shot type approaches. 12 The head shot type outperformed other shot type approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant–Fungus Species Combinations Engineer Physiological Activity Of
    © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | The Journal of Experimental Biology (2014) 217, 2540-2547 doi:10.1242/jeb.098483 RESEARCH ARTICLE Ant–fungus species combinations engineer physiological activity of fungus gardens J. N. Seal1,2,*, M. Schiøtt3 and U. G. Mueller2 ABSTRACT such complexity, the fungus-gardening insects have evolved obligate Fungus-gardening insects are among the most complex organisms macro-symbioses with specific clades of fungi, and use fungal because of their extensive co-evolutionary histories with obligate symbionts essentially as an external digestive organ that allows the fungal symbionts and other microbes. Some fungus-gardening insect insect to thrive on otherwise non-digestible substrates, such as lineages share fungal symbionts with other members of their lineage structural carbohydrates of plants (e.g. cellulose) (Aanen et al., and thus exhibit diffuse co-evolutionary relationships, while others 2002; Aylward et al., 2012a; Aylward et al., 2012b; Bacci et al., exhibit little or no symbiont sharing, resulting in host–fungus fidelity. 1995; Farrell et al., 2001; De Fine Licht and Biedermann, 2012; The mechanisms that maintain this symbiont fidelity are currently Martin, 1987a; Mueller et al., 2005). One of the most striking unknown. Prior work suggested that derived leaf-cutting ants in the attributes of these symbioses is the degree of physiological genus Atta interact synergistically with leaf-cutter fungi (Attamyces) integration: the insect host functions as a distributor of fungal by exhibiting higher fungal growth rates and enzymatic activities than enzymes, which digest plant fibers external to the insect’s body when growing a fungus from the sister-clade to Attamyces (so-called (Aanen and Eggleton, 2005; Aylward et al., 2012b; De Fine Licht ‘Trachymyces’), grown primarily by the non-leaf cutting and Biedermann, 2012; De Fine Licht et al., 2013; Martin, 1987b; Trachymyrmex ants that form, correspondingly, the sister-clade to Schiøtt et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Borowiec Et Al-2020 Ants – Phylogeny and Classification
    A Ants: Phylogeny and 1758 when the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné Classification published the tenth edition of his catalog of all plant and animal species known at the time. Marek L. Borowiec1, Corrie S. Moreau2 and Among the approximately 4,200 animals that he Christian Rabeling3 included were 17 species of ants. The succeeding 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA two and a half centuries have seen tremendous 2Departments of Entomology and Ecology & progress in the theory and practice of biological Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, classification. Here we provide a summary of the NY, USA current state of phylogenetic and systematic 3Social Insect Research Group, Arizona State research on the ants. University, Tempe, AZ, USA Ants Within the Hymenoptera Tree of Ants are the most ubiquitous and ecologically Life dominant insects on the face of our Earth. This is believed to be due in large part to the cooperation Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, which also allowed by their sociality. At the time of writing, includes wasps and bees. ▶ Eusociality, or true about 13,500 ant species are described and sociality, evolved multiple times within the named, classified into 334 genera that make up order, with ants as by far the most widespread, 17 subfamilies (Fig. 1). This diversity makes the abundant, and species-rich lineage of eusocial ants the world’s by far the most speciose group of animals. Within the Hymenoptera, ants are part eusocial insects, but ants are not only diverse in of the ▶ Aculeata, the clade in which the ovipos- terms of numbers of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Muscle Fibre Attachment
    The Journal of Experimental Biology 202, 797–808 (1999) 797 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 JEB1762 OPTIMIZING FORCE AND VELOCITY: MANDIBLE MUSCLE FIBRE ATTACHMENTS IN ANTS JÜRGEN PAUL* AND WULFILA GRONENBERG Theodor Boveri Institut der Universität, Lehrstuhl für Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany *e-mail: [email protected] Accepted 14 January; published on WWW 3 March 1999 Summary To be able to perform swift and powerful movements, attached fibres and they maximize speed of action at the ant mandible closer muscles are composed of two expense of force output. (2) Ants performing particularly subpopulations of muscle fibres: fast fibres for rapid forceful mandible movements, such as seed cracking, rely actions and slow fibres for forceful biting. All these fibres on many short parallel muscle fibres contained within a attach to a sturdy and complex apodeme which conveys broad head capsule. Their slower muscles incorporate a force into the mandible base. Fast muscle fibres attach large proportion of filament-attached fibres. Two simple directly to the apodeme. Slow fibres may attach directly or models explain how the attachment angles are optimized insert at individual thin filament processes of the apodeme with respect to force and velocity output and how filament- which vary in length. Comparisons of different ant species attached fibres help to generate the largest power output suggest two basic principles underlying the design of from the available head capsule volume. mandible muscles. (1) Ants specialized for fast mandible movements generally feature long heads which contain long fast muscle fibres that attach to the apodeme at small Key words: biomechanics, insect, apodeme, ant, feeding, muscle angles.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Loss of Wings in Queens of the Ant Odontomachus Coquereli from Madagascar
    Insect. Soc. 54 (2007) 183 – 188 0020-1812/07/020183-6 Insectes Sociaux DOI 10.1007/s00040-007-0930-0 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2007 Research article Permanent loss of wings in queens of the ant Odontomachus coquereli from Madagascar M. Molet1, C. Peeters1 and B.L. Fisher2 1 Laboratoire dEcologie CNRS UMR 7625, UniversitØ Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai Saint Bernard, 75005 Paris, France; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 875 Howard Street, San Francisco, California 94103, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Received 15 December 2006; revised 26 February 2007; accepted 1 March 2007. Published Online First 20 March 2007 Abstract. Winged queens are the most common repro- Keywords: Ergatoid queen, morphometry, colony fission, ductives in ants. They are morphologically specialized for intermorph, caste. independent colony foundation, with wings for long- range dispersal and metabolic reserves to raise the first brood. However independent foundation can sometimes be selected against and replaced by fission, featuring Introduction short-range dispersal on the ground and reproductives that are dependent on the wingless workers for all non- Colonial reproduction has a major impact on the mor- reproductive tasks. We investigated the evolutionary phology of reproductives in ants. Independent colony consequences of this transition on the morphology of foundation is performed by winged queens that disperse the reproductives by collecting 30 colonies of Odonto- by flight, mate and found their colony alone (Hçlldobler machus coquereli from Madagascar, the only species in and Wilson, 1990). High mortality of foundresses can the genus where winged queens have never been found.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Communities in Different Tissues of Atta Sexdens Rubropilosa Leaf-Cutting Ants
    Curr Microbiol (2017) 74:1216–1225 DOI 10.1007/s00284-017-1307-x Microbial Communities in Different Tissues of Atta sexdens rubropilosa Leaf-cutting Ants 1 1 2 1 Alexsandro S. Vieira • Manuela O. Ramalho • Cintia Martins • Vanderlei G. Martins • Odair C. Bueno1 Received: 6 February 2017 / Accepted: 11 July 2017 / Published online: 18 July 2017 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017 Abstract Bacterial endosymbionts are common in all were Burkholderiales, Clostridiales, Syntrophobacterales, insects, and symbiosis has played an integral role in ant Lactobacillales, Bacillales, and Actinomycetales (midgut) evolution. Atta sexdens rubropilosa leaf-cutting ants cul- and Entomoplasmatales, unclassified c-proteobacteria, and tivate their symbiotic fungus using fresh leaves. They need Actinomycetales (postpharyngeal glands). The high abun- to defend themselves and their brood against diseases, but dance of Entomoplasmatales in the postpharyngeal glands they also need to defend their obligate fungus gardens, (77%) of the queens was an unprecedented finding. We their primary food source, from infection, parasitism, and discuss the role of microbial communities in different tis- usurpation by competitors. This study aimed to character- sues and castes. Bacteria are likely to play a role in ize the microbial communities in whole workers and dif- nutrition and immune defense as well as helping antimi- ferent tissues of A. sexdens rubropilosa queens using Ion crobial defense in this ant species. Torrent NGS. Our results showed that the microbial com- munity in the midgut differs in abundance and diversity Keywords Attini Á Endosymbiont Á Entomoplasmatales Á from the communities in the postpharyngeal gland of the Next-generation sequencing queen and in whole workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleodistributions and Comparative Molecular Phylogeography of Leafcutter Ants (Atta Spp.) Provide New Insight Into the Origins of Amazonian Diversity
    Paleodistributions and Comparative Molecular Phylogeography of Leafcutter Ants (Atta spp.) Provide New Insight into the Origins of Amazonian Diversity Scott E. Solomon1,2,3*, Mauricio Bacci, Jr.3, Joaquim Martins, Jr.3, Giovanna Gonc¸alves Vinha3, Ulrich G. Mueller1 1 Section of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America, 2 Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 3 Center for the Study of Social Insects, Sa˜o Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil Abstract The evolutionary basis for high species diversity in tropical regions of the world remains unresolved. Much research has focused on the biogeography of speciation in the Amazon Basin, which harbors the greatest diversity of terrestrial life. The leading hypotheses on allopatric diversification of Amazonian taxa are the Pleistocene refugia, marine incursion, and riverine barrier hypotheses. Recent advances in the fields of phylogeography and species-distribution modeling permit a modern re-evaluation of these hypotheses. Our approach combines comparative, molecular phylogeographic analyses using mitochondrial DNA sequence data with paleodistribution modeling of species ranges at the last glacial maximum (LGM) to test these hypotheses for three co-distributed species of leafcutter ants (Atta spp.). The cumulative results of all tests reject every prediction of the riverine barrier hypothesis, but are unable to reject several predictions of the Pleistocene refugia and marine incursion hypotheses. Coalescent dating analyses suggest that population structure formed recently (Pleistocene-Pliocene), but are unable to reject the possibility that Miocene events may be responsible for structuring populations in two of the three species examined.
    [Show full text]