Weak Two Bids and Responses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weak Two Bids and Responses Stage 2 Conventions by Neil Rosen Weak Two Bids and Responses I’M SURE you all play Weak Two bids Pre-empting Style round (you can of course factor in other rather than strong two bids already. What! considerations such as vulnerability and You don’t? I really think you should . Partnerships should agree various prin ci - obviously the quality of your hand!) a) Weak two bids are far more frequent ples for pre-empting, whether at the two So holding: than strong two bids. level or higher. Good partnerships decide b) They are much more troublesome for on all sorts of parameters to factor in – If partner opens 2 ™, it the opponents. here are a few to think over: ´ 3 2 is vital to raise to 3 ™ c) Strong two bids never seem to work ™ K 8 6 on the first round. that well anyway! a) The vulnerability (be more cautious t A 8 7 2 This is not (repeat, not) d) Weak two bids are great fun to play! when vulnerable etc.) ® K 9 4 3 invitational to game, it b) Position at the table (1st seat = is purely raising the There are two mainstream systems aggressive, 2nd seat = sound, 3rd seat stakes before the people use: = fairly random) opponents have had a chance to establish c) Whether a side four-card major is their own fit and values. i) Benjy, or Reverse Benjy, Acol. These acceptable or not. were introduced by Albert Benjamin d) Whether you can open a Weak Two Responding to a 2 t Opener (a redoubtable Scot who lived well with A-K-Q-x-x-x (my preference is into his 90s). Benjy goes like this: definitely not to do so – partner can Since 3NT is often the desirable final desti - 2® = 8 playing tricks (unspecified never judge accurately). nation the responses are geared accordingly: suit) or 21-22 balanced 2t = Game force Responding in a New Suit New suit = constructive, non-forcing, (or 23-24 balanced) to a Weak Two as discussed (typically a six- 2™ = Weak two opener card suit with 10-14 HCP) (six-cards in length) I like to recommend that in response to Jump in = natural and 2´ = Weak two opener any Weak Two the bid of a new suit is new suit game-forcing (six-cards in length) constructive but not forcing. Generally 2NT = relay. The normal requi re- 2NT = 19-20 balanced opener can raise if suitable, or occasionally ment for this is about 15 In Reverse Benjy: rebid a semi-solid suit if maximum. To HCP (some times less with a 2® = Game force create a force, either jump or start with nice fit). The relay asks for (or 23-24 balanced) 2NT. features. A feature is defined 2t = 8 playing tricks (unspecified as a possible stopper for suit) or 21-22 balanced Raising the Weak Two Suit 3NT, i.e. A, K-x, Q-x-x, 2™ = Weak two opener J-x-x-x etc. as opposed to (six-cards in length) 2t –3t, 2 ™ –3™ and 2 ´ –3´ are all a con trol or singleton etc. 2´ = Weak two opener essentially ‘barrage bids’ i.e. pre-emptive. The responses are: (six-cards in length) It is so important to raise straight away New suit = feature 2NT = 19-20 balanced to the three level to make life difficult for 3t = minimum the opponents, rather than lamely passing, 3NT = maximum with ii) Weak Two bids in diamonds, hearts allowing them to find their fit and then a good suit (two and spades. This is my preferred bidding on the next round. of the top three option, I must say. It just gives you The level of the fit tells us roughly that honours) more opportunity for pre-emption with: Raising to 3 t is essentially pre - and I have always felt that the coded emptive (usually three-card support element of Benjy doesn’t work well at 8 trumps – bid to the two level to conform to the level of the fit and all in uncontested auctions – let alone 9 trumps – bid to the three level anything between 8 and 14 HCP). if the opponents interfere. I also do 10 trumps – bid to the four level (or This bid is purely and simply trying not recommend any system which higher!) to throw a spanner in the opponents’ forces a balanced 19 count to open works and does not therefore need to 2NT; it works so much better to open This gives an indication of whether to be defined too closely other than it one of a suit and rebid 2NT (18-19). raise or even how far to raise on the first normally has fewer than 14 or 15 HCP. 26 English Bridge December 2012 www.ebu.co.uk Responding to 2 ™ and 2 ´ Openers If the opponents double: Redouble = strong hand, usually In my own preferred methods, most of the seek ing to penalise CLUB PLAYER’S details from the 2 t opener hold, but the New suit = constructive and non- responses to the relay of 2NT change: now, forcing BIDDING QUIZ since usually the desired finishing spot is in 2NT = still a relay the major opened, we show shortages in res - Supporting at the three level = pre - ON each of the following problems, ponse to the relay. So, after a 2NT enquiry: emptive you are West. What should you bid with each hand on the given auction? New suit = singleton/void, Example Julian Pottage gives his answers on non-minimum Return to major = minimum Here is an example of how well the system page 54. (usually no works: the key point I am trying to get shortage to show across is that this method is so much conveniently, i.e. better than others because rather than just Hand 1 WNES below the major) trying to describe overall strength and suit - ´ A 1NT 3´ 3NT = maximum , no quality, it zooms in on using good judg - ™ J 2 ? shortage but ment to reach excellent contracts when the t A K 9 8 7 4 good suit (2 of cards fit well. Clearly if you have the values ® 10 6 4 3 top 3 honours) for game, do not use the relay simply for Four of major = maximum, no practice as so many seem to do – just bid shortage, not game! Only use the 2NT relay if there is such good suit- uncertainty over whether to bid game (or Hand 2 WNES quality sometimes slam!). ´ K 8 7 6 1t Dble Pass You hold the following hand: ™ K 8 7 5 ? In common with methods such as splinters, t Q 9 2 the key to this easy-to-play, efficient system If partner opens ® Q J is to understand which holdings facing ´ A J 7 2™, then rather shortage are either good or bad: ™ J 8 6 than using some t A 8 7 2 other method to Good holdings: A-x-x, x-x-x, x-x-x-x, ® K Q 6 get useless infor m a - Hand 3 WNES i.e. no wasted points and length (more tion, let’s see how ´ A K Q 8 1´ Pass 2´ Pass ruffing potential) are good. our relay works. ™ 6 5 4 2 ? Bad holdings: K-Q-x, K-J-x, x, i.e. t A 3 wasted points are very poor – as is of ® K 8 7 course duplicated shortage (if partner Hand A Hand B and you both have a singleton in the ´ 8 6 ´ 8 6 same suit, that is bad news!). ™ A Q 10 7 5 2 ™ A Q 10 7 5 2 t 3 t J 9 6 3 Hand 4 WNES Dealing with Intervention after You ® J 9 7 5 ® 3 ´ Q J 1™ Pass 1´ Pass Have Opened with a Weak Two Bid ™ Q J 10 7 5 ? t K 10 8 5 All bids, wherever possible, retain their orig - If partner has Hand A, he will respond 3 t ® A 2 inal meaning. Doubles after intervention to your 2NT relay to show shortage, ma - are always penalties and not negative, the king game an ex cellent proposition. But if same as after higher pre-empts. partner has Hand B, he will advertise club WNES shortage with 3 ®, making game decidedly Hand 5 1® 1´ 1NT If the opponents overcall at the two level: against the odds. Please note that other ´ J 9 5 2® 3® Pass Pass Double = penalties relay systems such as Ogust (which ask ™ K J 10 7 6 ? 2NT = relay about points and suit-quality) would treat t K Q 4 New suit = constructive and non- these hands as the same, whether the short - ® 8 4 forcing as before age was in clubs or diamonds. Supporting at the three level = still Finally, an integral part of adopting the pre-emptive as before ethos of playing Weak Two openers is to play Weak Jump Overcalls as well. They put Hand 6 WNES If the opponents overcall at the three level: great pressure on the opponents and give a ´ 6 1t 2´ Double = penalties part nership plenty of scope to gain confi - ™ A Q 8 6 ? New suit (below partner’s) = con- dence and experience in having a regular t J 10 9 5 structive and non- opportunity to judge when to use them. ® Q 8 6 5 forcing as before Do try these methods, they are easy to New suit (above partner’s) = for cing learn, simple to use and deliver great Supporting = competitive results! r www.ebu.co.uk December 2012 English Bridge 27.
Recommended publications
  • Things You Might Like to Know About Duplicate Bridge
    ♠♥♦♣ THINGS YOU MIGHT LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT DUPLICATE BRIDGE Prepared by MayHem Published by the UNIT 241 Board of Directors ♠♥♦♣ Welcome to Duplicate Bridge and the ACBL This booklet has been designed to serve as a reference tool for miscellaneous information about duplicate bridge and its governing organization, the ACBL. It is intended for the newer or less than seasoned duplicate bridge players. Most of these things that follow, while not perfectly obvious to new players, are old hat to experienced tournaments players. Table of Contents Part 1. Expected In-behavior (or things you need to know).........................3 Part 2. Alerts and Announcements (learn to live with them....we have!)................................................4 Part 3. Types of Regular Events a. Stratified Games (Pairs and Teams)..............................................12 b. IMP Pairs (Pairs)...........................................................................13 c. Bracketed KO’s (Teams)...............................................................15 d. Swiss Teams and BAM Teams (Teams).......................................16 e. Continuous Pairs (Side Games)......................................................17 f. Strategy: IMPs vs Matchpoints......................................................18 Part 4. Special ACBL-Wide Events (they cost more!)................................20 Part 5. Glossary of Terms (from the ACBL website)..................................25 Part 6. FAQ (with answers hopefully).........................................................40 Copyright © 2004 MayHem 2 Part 1. Expected In-Behavior Just as all kinds of competitive-type endeavors have their expected in- behavior, so does duplicate bridge. One important thing to keep in mind is that this is a competitive adventure.....as opposed to the social outing that you may be used to at your rubber bridge games. Now that is not to say that you can=t be sociable at the duplicate table. Of course you can.....and should.....just don=t carry it to extreme by talking during the auction or play.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the 30 Annual Cavendish Invitational
    World Bridge Productions Presents the Invitational Bulletin Number 1 Wednesday, May 5, 2004 Editor: Rich Colker Contributing Editor: Barry Rigal Welcome to the 30th Annual Cavendish Invitational W orld Bridge Productions welcomes you to the 2004 Once again our field is truly international in scope, just as Cavendish Pairs, John Roberts Teams and World Bridge many of our North American tournaments have become. Productions Pairs. This year Bridge Base will Players are here from all over the world (alas, once again provide live Internet Vugraph yes, still no one from Antarctica) including coverage of the Teams and Pairs (at many of the world’s top players. bridgebase.com). The on-site proceedings will once again feature the lovely George It’s good to see so many friends and familiar Jacobs, the soft-spoken Chris Compton, and faces. In the spirit of friendship and good whoever else we can coerce into making a bridge we welcome you to the 2004 fool of themselves. Cavendish Invitational. We wish everyone a fun time and a successful experience. W e’re This year’s five-session Cavendish back at the Rio (as we were in 2002), so Invitational Pairs features a star-studded fifty- enjoy the hotel, the casino, Las Vegas and pair field (see page 3) while the three- good bridge to all! session John Roberts Teams, in its new prize-only format, anticipates sixteen entrants — Bob Hamman, Robert Blanchard, Bill (see page 2). The three-session WBP Pairs Rosenbaum and Roy Welland sports its own field of stars (see page 3). A complete schedule for this year’s tournament can be found on page 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Updated July 2020 Changes from Last Version Highlighted in Yellow Author Title Date Edition Cover Sgnd Comments
    Last updated July 2020 Changes from last version highlighted in yellow Author Title Date Edition Cover Sgnd Comments ANON THE LAWS OF ROYAL AUCTION BRIDGE 1914 1st Card Small, stitched booklet with red covers ABERN Wendell & FIELDER Jarvis BRIDGE IS A CONTACT SPORT 1995 1st Card ABRAHAMS Gerald BRAINS IN BRIDGE 1962 1st No DW Ditto 1962 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library "A C B" AUCTION BRIDGE FOR BEGINNERS AND OTHERS 1929 Rev ed No DW ACKERSLEY Chris THE BRIDGING OF TROY 1986 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ADAMS J R DEFENCE AT AUCTION BRIDGE 1930 1st No DW AINGER Simon SIMPLE CONVENTIONS FOR THE ACOL SYSTEM 1995 1st Card ALBARRAN Pierre & JAIS Pierre HOW TO WIN AT RUBBER BRIDGE 1961 1st UK No DW Ditto 1961 1st UK DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ALDER Philip YOU CAN PLAY BRIDGE 1983 1st Card 1st was hb ALLEN David THE PHONEY CLUB The Cleveland Club System 1992 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library Ditto 1992 1st DW AMSBURY Joe BRIDGE: BIDDING NATURALLY 1979 1st DW Ditto 1979 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ANDERTON Philip BRIDGE IN 20 LESSONS 1961 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library Ditto 1961 1st DW PLAY BRIDGE 1967 1st DW Ditto 1967 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ARKELL Reginald BRIDGE WITHOUT SIGHS 1934 2nd No DW Ditto 1934 2nd No dw ARMSTRONG, Len The Final Deal 1995 1st Paper AUHAGEN Ulrich DAS GROBE BUCH VOM BRIDGE 1973 1st DW Ex-Rixi Markus Library with compliment slip "BADSWORTH" BADSWORTH ON BRIDGE 1903 1st Boards Ex-G C H Fox Library aeg BADSWORTH ON BRIDGE 1903 1st Boards Aeg; IN PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE AUCTION BRIDGE AND ROYAL AUCTION 1913 2nd Boards BAILEY Alan ABRIDGED
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Glossary
    Bridge Glossary Above the line In rubber bridge points recorded above a horizontal line on the score-pad. These are extra points, beyond those for tricks bid and made, awarded for holding honour cards in trumps, bonuses for scoring game or slam, for winning a rubber, for overtricks on the declaring side and for under-tricks on the defending side, and for fulfilling doubled or redoubled contracts. ACOL/Acol A bidding system commonly played in the UK. Active An approach to defending a hand that emphasizes quickly setting up winners and taking tricks. See Passive Advance cue bid The cue bid of a first round control that occurs before a partnership has agreed on a suit. Advance sacrifice A sacrifice bid made before the opponents have had an opportunity to determine their optimum contract. For example: 1♦ - 1♠ - Dbl - 5♠. Adverse When you are vulnerable and opponents non-vulnerable. Also called "unfavourable vulnerability vulnerability." Agreement An understanding between partners as to the meaning of a particular bid or defensive play. Alert A method of informing the opponents that partner's bid carries a meaning that they might not expect; alerts are regulated by sponsoring organizations such as EBU, and by individual clubs or organisers of events. Any method of alerting may be authorised including saying "Alert", displaying an Alert card from a bidding box or 'knocking' on the table. Announcement An explanatory statement made by the partner of the player who has just made a bid that is based on a partnership understanding. The purpose of an announcement is similar to that of an Alert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contract 'Bridge Journal
    II !I 1 I BUr THAT'S NOT ALL -- Kolynos Dental Cream cleans and refreshes the mouth -its penetrating foam encourages u feeling of weil­ being. Those who value their personal oppenrnn~e know that Kolynos protects their teeth and keeps thein spa.rlding-white.· 'Kolynos t)viec n day' is a habit to be cultivated ••• rcgulnrly. .;.- ... ROLYNOS DENTAL CREAM .:::· -.......__ REGD. .--.. P ... ,.: I .. •O ...... ... "' ~: . -~ -~ . .. .> ;...- Less nationalisation now · means ·- better living sooner Issued by the ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANIES Public Relations· Committee A ACHILLE SERRE ~ r!lfwz~ cvtd Portland Club 0~;;v~ *"j(~ ~Mil~ Cup 1946-47 D.D.T MOTHPROOFING *RETfX Achille Serre's unique process • • • for giving new sheen to silks and satins and firmness and resilience to woollens,. BRITISH BRIDGE' I ' LEAGUE CLUB CHAMPIONSHIP ACHILLE SERRE , LONDON , E. l7 for Pairs from Clubs IF YOU KEEP • • • POULTRY WE CAN SUPPLY AN EXCELLENT RANGE OF An Open Contest APPLIANCES fo r all members af any CATALOGUE FROM Bridge, Social or Golf H. & H. BLACKNELL Club with a card room. FARNBOROUGH, HANTS PHONE: 106 The first round to be held in the Club entering . for the CONDITIONS OF SALE AND SUPPLY. This perlodlcnl l.s sold subject to U1e following Contest before the 31st Jan., conditions, namely, that It shall not, without 1947, the winners qualifying to the written consent of the publlshe111 1l111t ~:iveu, he lent, resold, hired out or oU1erwlso play in a .week-end Congress dlsposcd of by way of Tmde except at the full retail price of 1/6; and that It shall not for the remaining rounds, such he lent, rcsol.~ 1 hired out or othenvlso disposed week-end to be organised by of In n muUUiotcd condition or In any un· authorised cover by way of Tmde ; or afllxed the British Bridge League.
    [Show full text]
  • Becker Elected to Hall of Fame Tds from Texas the Goren Club
    Volume 49, Number 2 49th Spring North American Bridge Championships Daily Bulletin Saturday, April 1, 2006 Editors: Paul Linxwiler and Dave Smith TDs from Texas Meckstroth, Johnson Becker elected Check this space each day for profiles of Texas- lead Open Pairs based ACBL Tournament Directors that are working Jeff Meckstroth and Perry Johnson posted the to Hall of Fame here at the Dallas NABC. high score in the qualifying round of the Silodor If there’s one thing in life that really Michael Becker Open Pairs. Meckstroth and Johnson led the field motivates Doris Allen, it’s a challenge. of Boca Raton FL is of 314 pairs with a two-session total of 1291.82 Growing up in Palestine in east Texas, the newest member (988 average, 38 top), a performance of eight she faced the challenge of keeping up of the ACBL Bridge boards above average. with three older brothers. Later, she took Hall of Fame. In second with 1203.08 were George Jacobs on the responsibilities of running five beauty shops Becker, 62, received and Alfredo Versace. In last year’s event, Jacobs in her home town of Harlingen TX. Then there was more than half of the and Versace set a pairs record by posting a 78.23% the daunting task of learning to play bridge, whence votes cast by the score in the first qualifying session. came her career change to tournament director, approximately 300 In third place are local players Jeff Olson and along with a whole new set of hurdles to leap. Hall of Fame Derrell Childs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Magee's Acol Bidding Quiz
    Number One Hundred and Fifty June 2015 Bernard Magee’s Acol Bidding Quiz BRIDGEYou are West in the auctions below, playing ‘Standard Acol’ with a weak no-trump (12-14 points) and 4-card majors. 1. Dealer West. Love All. 4. Dealer East. Game All. 7. Dealer North. E/W Game. 10. Dealer East. Love All. ♠ A K 7 6 4 3 2 ♠ 7 6 ♠ A 8 7 ♠ K Q 10 4 3 ♥ 6 N ♥ K 10 3 N ♥ 7 6 5 4 N ♥ 7 6 N W E ♦ K 2 W E ♦ J 5 4 ♦ Q 10 8 6 W E ♦ 5 4 W E S ♣ 7 6 5 S ♣ A Q 7 6 3 ♣ 4 2 S ♣ Q J 10 7 S West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South ? 1♠ 1NT 1NT Dbl 2♦ 1♥ Pass ? ? 1♠ Pass 1NT Pass ? 2. Dealer East. E/W Game. 5. Dealer East. Game All. 8. Dealer West. E/W Game. 11. Dealer East. Love All. ♠ Q J 3 ♠ 7 6 ♠ A 8 5 3 ♠ 9 8 2 ♥ 7 N ♥ K 10 3 N ♥ A 9 8 7 N ♥ Q J 10 N W E W E W E W E ♦ A K 8 7 6 5 4 ♦ 5 4 ♦ K 6 4 ♦ 8 3 S S S S ♣ A 8 ♣ Q J 7 6 4 3 ♣ A 2 ♣ A 9 6 4 3 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South 3♠ Pass 1♠ 1NT 1♥ 1♠ Pass Pass 1♣ Pass ? ? ? 2♣ Pass 2♦ Pass ? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaheim Angels?–Not Exactly
    Presents Anaheim Angels?–Not Exactly Appeals at the 2000 Summer NABC Plus cases from the World Teams Olympiad Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ...................................................... iii The Expert Panel.................................................v Cases from Anaheim Tempo (Cases 1-21)...........................................1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 22-26)..........................75 Misinformation (Cases 27-43) ..................................90 Other (Case 44-48)..........................................142 Cases from the 11th World Teams Bridge Olympiad, Maastricht..........158 Tempo (Cases 49-50)........................................159 Misinformation (Cases 51-55) .................................165 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists..........................182 Closing Remarks From the Editor..................................186 The Panel’s Director and Committee Ratings .........................191 NABC Appeals Committee .......................................192 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMW Appeal Without Merit Warning LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goal is to inform, provide constructive criticism, and foster change (hopefully) for the better in a manner that is entertaining, instructive and stimulating. The ACBL
    [Show full text]
  • C:\My Documents\Adobe
    American Contract Bridge League Presents Beached in Long Beach Appeals at the 2003 Summer NABC Plus cases from the 2003 Open and Women’s USBC Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................... iii The Expert Panel ................................................ v Cases from Long Beach Tempo (Cases 1-11) .......................................... 1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 12-20) ......................... 38 Misinformation (Cases 19-31).................................. 60 Other (Cases 32-37) ........................................ 107 Cases from U.S. Open and Women’s Bridge Championships (Cases 38-40) . 122 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists ......................... 138 Closing Remarks From the Editor ................................. 141 Advice for Advancing Players.................................... 143 NABC Appeals Committee ...................................... 144 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMW Appeal Without Merit Warning BIT Break in Tempo CoC Conditions of Contest CC Convention Card LA Logical Alternative MP Masterpoints MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always our goal is to inform, provide constructive criticism and stimulate change (that is hopefully for the better) in a way that is instructive and entertaining. At NABCs, appeals from non-NABC+
    [Show full text]
  • Weak Two Bids
    7-2-1 WEAK TWO BIDS A weak two bid opening implies a hand that has a good six-card suit, but not enough in high cards to definitely call for an opening bid. Vulnerable vs non-vulnerable, weak two bids are often hands that might be opened with one of a suit if not playing weak two bids. Also, with unfavorable vulnerability a seven-card suit is permissible. It is difficult to have enough tricks for a weak two bid with this vulnerability and yet lack opening bid strength. Requirements -- 6-12 HCP, varying with seat position and vulnerability -- Weakest suit K109xxx, usually better -- Most of the strength in the suit opened -- No side suit of four or more cards Flaws: -- Five-card suit (only in third or fourth position, please) -- Singleton or void in a minor, or major suit void -- Support for a side major -- Only one of the top three honors in the suit opened Do not open a badly flawed hand. Not vulnerable, the hand should have 1-1/2 to 2+ defensive tricks, vulnerable 1-1/2 to 2-1/2. Partner will count on more than one trick from you on defense if she has a singleton in your suit. Playing trick strength requirements vary with vulnerability: Favorable 5 to 6 playing tricks Nobody vul. 5-1/2 to 6-1/2 Both vul. 6 to 7 Unfavorable 6-1/2 to 7-1/2 With a suit like AKQ10xx or KQJ9xx, six playing tricks are enough with unfavorable vulnerability. These requirements may be relaxed somewhat in third or fourth seat.
    [Show full text]
  • LESSON 3 Overcalls
    LESSON 3 Overcalls General Concepts General Introduction Group Activities Sample Deals 120 More Commonly Used Conventions in the 21st Century GENERAL CONCEPTS Overcalls This is the first of two lessons covering overcalls. The main focus is on natural overcalls and re- sponses, although the concept of two-suited overcalls is introduced at the end of the lesson and will be carried over into the next lesson. Bidding It is assumed that the students are familiar with the general concept of simple overcalls. The lesson looks at the modern trend toward a wide range of strength for a simple overcall with preemp- tive jump raises by the advancer — partner of the overcaller. The recommended ACBL style is that new-suit responses are not forcing. This results in extensive use of the cuebid by the advancer. The modern style of weak jump overcalls is also recommended. Here are the topics covered: Simple Overcalls in a Suit Since the other competitive action, the takeout double, shows an opening bid or better, many players tend to treat the overcall in a similar fashion. The overcall actually covers a much wider range and depends on factors such as suit quality, level and vulnerability. In addition, not every hand with 13 or more points is suitable for an overcall. Responding to an Overcall Most players are used to responding to an overcall in a fashion similar to responding to an opening bid. The “standard” approach recommended here is to use weak preemptive jump raises and to treat a new suit as non forcing. This requires that the cuebid be used both with a fit and with a hand strong enough to make a forcing bid in a new suit.
    [Show full text]