Strategies to Prevent Mycotoxin Contamination of Food and Animal Feed: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategies to Prevent Mycotoxin Contamination of Food and Animal Feed: a Review Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 46:593–619 (2006) Copyright C Taylor and Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1040-8398 DOI: 10.1080/10408390500436185 Strategies to Prevent Mycotoxin Contamination of Food and Animal Feed: A Review BULENT KABAK Department of Food Engineering, Agricultural Faculty, University of Cukurova, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey ALAN D. W. DOBSON Microbiology Department and Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland IS¸IL˙ VAR Department of Food Engineering, Agricultural Faculty, University of Cukurova, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey Mycotoxins are fungal secondary metabolites that have been associated with severe toxic effects to vertebrates produced by many important phytopathogenic and food spoilage fungi including Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium, and Alternaria species. The contamination of foods and animal feeds with mycotoxins is a worldwide problem. We reviewed various control strategies to prevent the growth of mycotoxigenic fungi as well as to inhibit mycotoxin biosynthesis including pre-harvest (resistance varieties, field management and the use of biological and chemical agents), harvest management, and post-harvest (improving of drying and storage conditions, the use of natural and chemical agents, and irradiation) applications. While much work in this area has been performed on the most economically important mycotoxins, aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A much less information is available on other mycotoxins such as trichothecenes, fumonisin B1, zearalenone, citrinin, and patulin. In addition, physical, chemical, and biological detoxification methods used to prevent exposure to the toxic and carcinogenic effect of mycotoxins are discussed. Finally, dietary strategies, which are one of the most recent approaches to counteract the mycotoxin problem with special emphasis on in vivo and in vitro efficacy of several of binding agents (activated carbons, hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate, bentonite, zeolites, and lactic acid bacteria) have also been reviewed. Keywords Mycotoxin, detoxification, prevention INTRODUCTION Mycotoxins primarily occur in the mycelium of the toxi- genic moulds and may also be found in the spores of these Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites which are produced organisms13 and cause a toxic response, termed a mycotoxi- by several fungi mainly belonging to the genera: Aspergillus, cosis, when ingested by higher vertebrates and other animals.14 Penicillium, Fusarium, and Alternaria.1,2,3,4 While Aspergillus These secondary metabolites are synthesized during the end of and Penicillium species are generally found as contami- the exponential phase of growth and appear to have no biolog- nants in food during drying and storage, Fusarium and Al- ical significance with respect to mould growth/development or , − ternaria spp. can produce mycotoxins before or immediately competitiveness.13 15 17 All moulds are not toxigenic and while after harvesting.5 Up until now, approximately 400 secondary some mycotoxins are produced by only a limited number of metabolites with toxigenic potential produced by more than species, others may be produced by a relatively large range from , 100 moulds, have been reported, with the Food and Agricul- several genera.13 16 ture Organization (FAO) estimating that as much as 25% of The toxic effect of mycotoxin ingestion in both humans the world’s agricultural commodities are contaminated with and animals depends on a number of factors including in- mycotoxins,6−11 leading to significant economic losses.12 take levels, duration of exposure, toxin species, mechanisms of action, metabolism, and defense mechanisms.10,17 Consump- Address correspondence to Bulent Kabak, Department of Food Engineering, Agricultural Faculty, University of Cukurova, TR-01330 Adana,Turkey. E-mail: tion of mycotoxin-contaminated food or feed does however [email protected] lead to the induction of teratogenic, cancerogenic, oestrogenic, 593 594 B. KABAK ET AL. neurotoxic, and immunosuppresive effect in humans and/or Prevention Strategies of Mycotoxins in Cereals animals.11,18 The mycotoxins of most significance from both The main mycotoxin hazards associated with wheat pre- a public health and agronomic perspective include the aflatox- harvest in Europe are the toxins that are produced by fungi ins, trichothecenes, fumonisins, ochratoxin A (OTA), patulin, belonging to the genus Fusarium in the growing crop. Mycotox- tremorgenic toxins, and ergot alkoloids.10,11,17,19 ins produced by these fungi include zearalenone (ZEN) as well Because of the detrimental effects of these mycotoxins, as trichothecenes and include nivalenol (NIV), deoxynivalenol a number of strategies have been developed to help prevent (DON) and T-2 toxin. Fusarium species are also responsible for the growth of mycotoxigenic fungi as well as to decontami- a serious disease called Fusarium Head Blight (FHB), which nate and/or detoxify mycotoxin contaminated foods and animal can result in significant losses in both crop yield and quality. It feeds. 20,21 These strategies include: is important to note that although Fusarium infection is gener- • The prevention of mycotoxin contamination, ally considered to be a pre-harvest problem, it is possible for • Detoxification of mycotoxins present in food and feed, poor drying practices to lead to an increased susceptibility for 29 • Inhibition of mycotoxin absorption in the gastrointestinal in storage mycotoxin contamination. tract. Resistance Varieties. There are inherent differences in the susceptibility of various cereal species to FHB, which are re- flected in differences in the degree of mycotoxin contamination PREVENTION OF MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION to which each species is susceptible. The differences between crop species appear to differ between countries. This is proba- Mycotoxin contamination may occur in the field before har- bly due to differences in the genetic pool within each country’s vest, during harvesting, or during storage and processing,1,22,23 breeding program and the different environmental and agro- thus methods for the prevention of mycotoxin contamination nomic conditions in which crops are cultivated.30 Tekauz31 has can conveniently be divided into pre-harvest, harvesting and shown that DON levels in wheat, barley, and oats were similar post-harvest strategies.24 Whereas certain treatments have been when grown under the same field conditions in Western Canada found to reduce specific mycotoxin formation in different com- in 2001. However, Langesth and Rudberget32 have shown that modities, the complete elimination of mycotoxin contaminated oats had higher levels of DON contamination than barley and commodities is currently not realistically achievable. wheat in Norway from 1996 to 1999. It has also been reported Several codes of practice have been developed by Codex Al- that in wheat; tall plants without awns, and plants with lax ears imentarius for the prevention and reduction of mycotoxins in tend to have lower rates of natural infection than plants that are cereals, peanuts, apple products, and raw materials. The elabo- short, awned, or which have a high spikelet density.33 ration and acceptance of a General Code of Practice by Codex Only seed varieties recommended for use in a particular area will provide uniform guidance for all countries to consider in of a country should be planted in that particular area.25 In recent attempting to control and manage contamination by various my- work by Mesterhazy,34 wheat varieties most resistant to FHB cotoxins. In order for this practice to be effective, it will be were shown to reduce DON production to near zero. In fact, re- necessary for the producers in each country to consider the gen- sistance seemed to depend to a great extent on inhibition of toxin eral principles given in the Code, taking into account their local production directly, since the most aggressive disease-causing crops, climate, and agronomic practices, before attempting to fungal strains were also those producing the highest levels of implement provisions in the Code. The recommendations for the DON. This author suggested that an increased availability of re- reduction of various mycotoxins in cereals are divided into two sistant varieties, coupled with the use of appropriate fungicides, parts: recommended practices based on Good Agricultural Prac- was the key in an integrated approach to mycotoxin control asso- tice (GAP) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP); a com- ciated with Fusarium. Similarly, in another field test, resistance plementary management system to consider in the future is the to both FHB and DON contamination in different wheat varieties use of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).25 has also been reported.35 Obtaining high levels of native genetic resistance in various Pre-Harvest Control Strategies crop types to toxigenic fungi has proven difficult to achieve. Problems in this regard have centered primarily on the lack of It is well established that mycotoxin contamination of agri- resistant control genotypes and on the lack of involvement of cultural product can occur in the field as well as during single major genes.36 Some resistance to Gibberella ear rot has storage.23,26,27,28 Since phytopathogenic fungi such as Fusar- however been reported in the past.37,38 A resistant gene has been ium and Alternaria spp can produce mycotoxins before or im- identified in Giberella39and maize hybrids produced which dis- mediately post harvesting several strategies have been developed
Recommended publications
  • Food Spoilage: Microorganisms and Their Prevention
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 2015, 5(4):47-56 ISSN : 2249-7412 CODEN (USA): AJPSKY Food Spoilage: Microorganisms and their prevention Seema Rawat Department of Botany and Microbiology, H. N. B. Garhwal (Central) University, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Food spoilage can be defined as “any sensory change (tactile, visual, olfactory or flavour)” which the consumer considers to be unacceptable. Spoilage may occur at any stage along food chain. Spoilage may arise from insect damage, physical damage, indigenous enzyme activity in the animal or plant tissue or by microbial infections. Most natural foods have a limited life. Perishable foods such as fish, meat and bread have a short life span. Other food can be kept for a considerably longer time but decomposes eventually. Enzymes can bring about destruction of polymers in some foods while chemical reactions such as oxidation and rancidity decompose others but the main single cause of food spoilage is invasion by microorganisms such as moulds, yeast and bacteria. In case of mould spoilage a furry growth covers the food and it becomes soft and often smells bad. Bacterial contamination is more dangerous because very often food does not look bad even though severely infected, it may appear quite normal. The presence of highly dangerous toxins and bacterial spores is often not detected until after an outbreak of food poisoning, laboratory examination uncovers the infecting agent. Key words: Food spoilage, Enzymes, Bacterial contamination, Food poisoning, Perishable foods. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Food spoilage is a metabolic process that causes foods to be undesirable or unacceptable for human consumption due to changes in sensory characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Losses and Waste in the Context of Sustainable Food Systems
    HLPE REPORT 8 Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems A report by The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition June 2014 HLPE Reports series #1 Price volatility and food security (2011) #2 Land tenure and international investments in agriculture (2011) #3 Food security and climate change (2012) #4 Social protection for food security (2012) #5 Biofuels and food security (2013) #6 Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security (2013) #7 Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition (2014) #8 Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems (2014) All HLPE reports are available at www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe 2 HLPE Steering Committee members (June 2014) Per Pinstrup-Andersen (Chair) Maryam Rahmanian (Vice-Chair) Amadou Allahoury Marion Guillou Sheryl Hendriks Joanna Hewitt Masa Iwanaga Carol Kalafatic Bernardo Kliksberg Renato Maluf Sophia Murphy Ruth Oniang’o Michel Pimbert Magdalena Sepúlveda Huajun Tang HLPE Project Team members Vishweshwaraiah Prakash (Team Leader) Jane Ambuko Walter Belik Jikun Huang Antonius Timmermans Coordinator of the HLPE Vincent Gitz This report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE) has been approved by the HLPE Steering Committee. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Committee on World Food Security, of its members, participants, or of the Secretariat. This report is made publicly available and its reproduction and dissemination is encouraged. Non- commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microbiology of Food Preservation (Part I)
    A study material for M.Sc. Biochemistry (Semester- IV) of Paper EC-01 Unit IV The Microbiology of Food Preservation (Part I) Dr. Reena Mohanka Professor & Head Department of Biochemistry Patna University Mob. No.:- +91-9334088879 E. Mail: [email protected] Food preservation Food products can be contaminated by a variety of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, former causing food borne diseases and latter causing significant economic losses for the food industry due to undesirable effects; especially negative impact on the shelf-life, textural characteristics, overall quality of finished food products. Hence ,prevention of microbial growth by using preservation methods is needed. Food preservation is the process of retaining food over a period of time without being contaminated by pathogenic microorganisms and without losing its color, texture , taste, flavour and nutritional values. Food preservation Food preservation is the process of retaining food over a period of time without being contaminated by pathogenic microorganisms and without losing its color, texture , taste, flavour and nutritional values. Foods are perishable Whyand fooddeteriorative preservation by nature.is indispensable: Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity ,oxygen and light are reasons of food deterioration. Microbial effects are the leading cause of food spoilage .Essentially all foods are derived from living cells of plant or animal origin. In some cases derived from some microorganisms by biotechnology methods. Primary target of food scientists is to make food safe as possible ;whether consumed fresh or processed. The preservation, processing and storage of food are vital for continuous supply of food in season or off-seasons . Apart from increasing the shelf life it helps in preventing food borne illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiological Spoilage of Fruits and Vegetables
    Microbiological Spoilage of Fruits and Vegetables Margaret Barth, Thomas R. Hankinson, Hong Zhuang, and Frederick Breidt Introduction Consumption of fruit and vegetable products has dramatically increased in the United States by more than 30% during the past few decades. It is also estimated that about 20% of all fruits and vegetables produced is lost each year due to spoilage. The focus of this chapter is to provide a general background on microbiological spoilage of fruit and vegetable products that are organized in three categories: fresh whole fruits and vegetables, fresh-cut fruits and vegetables, and fermented or acidified veg- etable products. This chapter will address characteristics of spoilage microorgan- isms associated with each of these fruit and vegetable categories including spoilage mechanisms, spoilage defects, prevention and control of spoilage, and methods for detecting spoilage microorganisms. Microbiological Spoilage of Fresh Whole Fruits and Vegetables Introduction During the period 1970–2004, US per capita consumption of fruits and vegetables increased by 19.9%, to 694.3 pounds per capita per year (ERS, 2007). Fresh fruit and vegetable consumption increased by 25.8 and 32.6%, respectively, and far exceeded the increases observed for processed fruit and vegetable products. If US consump- tion patterns continue in this direction, total per capita consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables would surpass consumption of processed fruits and vegetables within the next decade. This shift toward overall increased produce consumption can be attributed, at least in part, to increased awareness in healthy eating habits as revealed by a broad field of research addressing food consumption and health and promoted by the M.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Spoilage
    *63071 Or3cl 729 STATE Food Spoilage (Causes and Prevention) 0 E; Prepared by Extension Nutrition Specialists, Oregon State University - COLLECTO.1 A diamond may be forever, but food quality is not. tamed until the food can be eaten. When we purchase or grow high quality food, we must SoGIVE FOOD CARE to keep it safe and to handle it in such a way that the good quality is re- maintain quality. General Rules for Food Storage 1.Handle food gently to prevent bruising or breakage fection is greater in sliced or ground food. or cutting of the outside skinas the case may be. Do not wait for leftovers or foods cooked for later 2. Take food home as soon as you can after shopping. use to reach room temperature. Refrigerate them Put perishable food in the refrigerator immediately. quickly in covered containers. 3. Be sure that sliced or ground food is well-cooked Freeze or refrigerate sandwiches and other foods and well-refrigerated. The chance of spreading in- that you plan to take on picnics or outings. Signs of Spoilage Foods spoil if we keep them too long, handle them All of the actions explained above will not harm us carelessly, or store them improperly. We may see if we eat the food. Mold growth and yeast growth on mold growing where it is unwanted. Fruit juices may food usually are not harmful to persons who have eaten become bubbly from the fermentation of undesirable food spoiled in this way. The vitamin content may have yeast growth. Off-flavors may develop and sometimes been altered, but the food is still edible.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Microbial Food Spoilage
    Chapter 2 Microbial Food Spoilage The microbial food spoilage is one type of food spoilage that is caused by microorganisms. Food spoilage can define as the process in which the quality of the food deteriorates to some extent which is inconsumable for the person to eat. Food spoilage occurs as a result of the microbial attack, enzymatic digestion, chemical degradation, physical injury etc. The microbial food spoilage can be determined physically by the following method. Change in appearance: The appearance of the food changes by the microbial attack, which forms cloudiness and liquid formation in the food. Change texture: Texture changes occur as a result of slime formation due to an accumulation of microbial cells and tissue degradation. Color change: Color changes due to the chlorophyll breakdown and by the growth of mycelia. Change in taste in odor: The taste and odor of the food changes due to the oxidation of nitrogenous compounds, sulphides, organic acids etc. Causes of microbial food spoilage There are two common factors which favor the growth and multiplication of microorganisms, which include storage conditions of the food and chemical properties of the food. Storage conditions of the food: The storage conditions basically involve two environmental factors like temperature, pH and oxygen that favors the microbial growth on food. Temperature Psychrophilic and psychrotrophic microorganisms have the ability to grow at 0°C. Psychrotrophic microorganisms have a maximum temperature for growth above © IOR INTERNATIONAL PRESS 2020 Deepa I, Food and Dairy Biotechnology, https://doi.org/10.34256/ioriip2012 19 Microbial Food Spoilage 20°C and are widespread in natural environments and in foods.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension
    4 color EXTENSION Black/PMS 186 EXTENSION EC446 Food Storage Julie A. Albrecht, Extension Food Specialist Black EXTENSION Proper food storage helps maintain food quality How Food Spoils by retaining flavor, color, texture and nutrients, while reducing the chance of contracting a foodborne illness. Food spoilage and deterioration is no accident. It is a Foods can be classified into three groups. The first naturally occurring process. To understand how to main- group, perishable foods, includes meat, poultry, fish, tain the quality of food and prevent spoilage, we need to milk, eggs and many raw fruits and vegetables. All know what can cause spoilage. cooked foods are considered perishable foods. To store these foods for any length of time, perishable foods Microorganisms need to be held at refrigerator or freezer temperatures. Many types of microorganisms can cause food If refrigerated, perishable foods should be used within problems. The microorganisms that can cause foodborne several days. illness are called pathogenic microorganisms. These Semi-perishable foods, if properly stored and microorganisms grow best at room temperatures (60- handled, may remain unspoiled for six months to about 90oF), but most do not grow well at refrigerator or freezer one year. Flour, gain products, dried fruits and dry mixes temperatures. Pathogenic microorganisms may grow in are considered semi-perishable. foods without any noticeable change in odor, appearance or taste. Spoilage microorganisms, including some kinds Staple, or non-periabable, foods such as sugar, dried of bacteria, yeasts and molds, can grow well at tempera- beans, spices and canned goods do not spoil unless they tures as low as 40oF.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Control of Spoilage Fungi in Dairy Products: an Update
    microorganisms Review Diversity and Control of Spoilage Fungi in Dairy Products: An Update Lucille Garnier 1,2 ID , Florence Valence 2 and Jérôme Mounier 1,* 1 Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Ecologie Microbienne (LUBEM EA3882), Université de Brest, Technopole Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; [email protected] 2 Science et Technologie du Lait et de l’Œuf (STLO), AgroCampus Ouest, INRA, 35000 Rennes, France; fl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-(0)2-90-91-51-00; Fax: +33-(0)2-90-91-51-01 Received: 10 July 2017; Accepted: 25 July 2017; Published: 28 July 2017 Abstract: Fungi are common contaminants of dairy products, which provide a favorable niche for their growth. They are responsible for visible or non-visible defects, such as off-odor and -flavor, and lead to significant food waste and losses as well as important economic losses. Control of fungal spoilage is a major concern for industrials and scientists that are looking for efficient solutions to prevent and/or limit fungal spoilage in dairy products. Several traditional methods also called traditional hurdle technologies are implemented and combined to prevent and control such contaminations. Prevention methods include good manufacturing and hygiene practices, air filtration, and decontamination systems, while control methods include inactivation treatments, temperature control, and modified atmosphere packaging. However, despite technology advances in existing preservation methods, fungal spoilage is still an issue for dairy manufacturers and in recent years, new (bio) preservation technologies are being developed such as the use of bioprotective cultures. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the diversity of spoilage fungi in dairy products and the traditional and (potentially) new hurdle technologies to control their occurrence in dairy foods.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Mycotoxin Analysis and Detection of Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Grapes and Derived Products
    sustainability Review Recent Advances in Mycotoxin Analysis and Detection of Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Grapes and Derived Products Dimosthenis Kizis 1,*, Aikaterini-Eleni Vichou 1 and Pantelis I. Natskoulis 2,* 1 Laboratory of Mycology, Scientific Directorate of Phytopathology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, St. Delta 8, 14561 Kifissia, Greece; [email protected] 2 Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organisation DEMETER, Sofokli Venizelou 1, 14123 Lycovrissi, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (P.I.N.) Abstract: Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites of filamentous fungi that can cause toxic effects in human and animal health. Most of the filamentous fungi that produce these mycotoxins be- long to four genera, namely, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium, and Alternaria. Mycotoxigenic fungi, along with mycotoxins, create a constant and serious economic threat for agriculture in many terms, counting product losses due to crop contamination and food spoilage, as well malnutrition when considering nutritional quality degradation. Given the importance of robust and precise diagnostics of mycotoxins and the related producing fungi in the grape food chain, one of the most important agricultural sectors worldwide, the present review initially delivers a comprehensive presentation of mycotoxin reports on grape and derived products, including a wide range of commodities such as fresh grapes, raisins, wine, juices, and other processed products. Next, based on worldwide regulations’ requirements for mycotoxins, and referring to the relative literature, this work presents methodological approaches for mycotoxin determination, and stresses major methods for the de- Citation: Kizis, D.; Vichou, A.-E.; tection of fungal species responsible for mycotoxin production. The principle of function and basic Natskoulis, P.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 3: Food Safety, Storage & Preservation
    NUTRITION TRAINING MANUAL: Module 3 – Food Safety, Storage & Preservation MODULE 3: FOOD SAFETY, STORAGE & PRESERVATION Introduction Ensuring food safety and hygiene is important at individual, household and community level. It ensures that foods are safe for human consumption and that individuals do not develop any food-borne illnesses. This module equips participants with an understanding of key food safety and food hygiene issues and how these can be maintained within households and communities. The module explores different areas with regards to food safety including: food spoilage, food storage and food poisoning. An assessment of the food handling, safety, storage and hygiene practices by workers in Rwenzori and Mpanga tea estates revealed that: • Household ownership of food storage facilities varied with only 63% of households reportedly storing food • Households that stored food made use of cupboards, containers, baskets, sacks and open floors to store food. Those that did not own food storage facilities mentioned the lack of storage space, consumption of all food prepared and the lack of money to buy food storage facilities as being limiting factors to food storage. • Respondents identified the following food hygiene practices: proper covering of food (68% of respondents), cooking of food (22% of respondents), use of clean utensils in food preparation (5% of respondents), warming of leftover food before consumption (4% of respondents) and keeping cooked and raw foods separately (1% of the respondents) • Main challenges in ensuring food safety included the lack of adequate food storage facilities and poor storage methods that result in the destruction of stored food by pests, including cockroaches and rats Objectives of the module By the end of this module, participants should be able to demonstrate good practices with respect to food safety and hygiene, including through food storage and preservation techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Molds, Mycotoxins, and Concerns of the Food Industry”
    FRESH Seminar: “Molds, Mycotoxins, and Concerns of the Food Industry” Jae-Hyuk Yu, PhD Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin–Madison May 5, 2015 MADISON, Wis. (FRI) – Fungi and their toxins can cause significant problems for the food industry. UW– Madison professor and FRI Executive Committee member Jae-Hyuk Yu, PhD, recently provided an overview of molds, mycotoxins, and associated industry concerns at the last FRESH seminar for the spring 2015 semester. Fungi and animals belong to the “opisthokonts,” a broad group of eukaryotes. Fungi exhibit extraordinary diversity and are predicted to have more than 5 million species. Of the five main phyla of fungi, two are of particular importance to the food industry: the Zygomycota (often a common concern in food) and the Ascomycota (sac fungi responsible for mycotoxins). Yeasts are unicellular fungi, while molds are multicellular. Like plants, fungi have a cell wall; however, in fungi, the cell wall is made of chitin, while in plants, it is composed of cellulose. Fungi are non-photosynthetic, heterotrophic organisms, obtaining their carbon and energy from organic sources in their environment through their web-like hyphae. The molds can secrete enzymes from the tips of the hyphae to digest potential food sources; the digestion products can then diffuse back into the hyphae. Molds can grow rapidly, reproducing sexually or asexually via spores, which are typically more sensitive to environmental insults like heat than are bacterial spores. Fungal food spoilage can be very obvious. Yeast can produce bubbles or foam, and mold growth may be evident as fuzzy growth in bright colors with a circular growth pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Our Food Supply: Food Safety a to Z Reference Guide
    SCIENCE AND OUR FOOD SUPPLY FOODSCIENCE AND OUR FOOD SUPPLY SAFETY Investigating Food Safety from FAR to TABLE TO A Z REFERENCE GUIDE National Science Teachers Association SCIENCE AND OUR FOOD SUPPLY It’s Food Safety at Your Fingertips! The Food Safety A to Z Reference Guide serves as a Becoming food safety savvy is as easy as A–B–C! companion piece to the Science and Our Food Supply Let your fingers do the walking through this program’s following components: user-friendly reference guide that offers you a wealth of invaluable, up-to-date food safetySCIENCE AND OUR FOOD SUPPLY Investigating Food Safety fromVideo FAR to information. Also included are in-depth sectionsTABLE on the step-by-step journey food travels from Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety the farm to the table; how to prepare and Also online at: handle food safely; the Fight BAC!TM Campaign’s www.fda.gov/teachsciencewithfood 4 Simple Steps to Food Safety: Clean, Separate (Combat Cross-Contamination), Cook, and Chill; and fascinating food safety careers! Teacher’s Guide Labs & Activities Throughout the guide, you’ll also find a host of helpful tips, intriguing visuals, fun facts, and UNDERSTANDING answers to your most Frequently Asked MODULE 1 BACTERIA Questions. FARM Frequently MODULE 2 Fun Facts Asked Questions PROCESSING and ! ? MODULE 3 TRANSPORTATION Use this guide as a research tool for reinforcing the science concepts in the video, performing the RETAIL AND HOME MODULE 4 activities and labs, and to further enhance your knowledge of food safety. OUTBREAK and MODULE 5 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY It’s a feast of food safety information.
    [Show full text]