Corps Rejects MD Request to Fund Oyster Restoration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corps Rejects MD Request to Fund Oyster Restoration July-August 2018 Volume 28 Number 5 Exelon sues MD, Shells with baby oysters, calls Conowingo or spat, growing requirements on them, are washed an ‘unfair burden’ overboard ≈ State and utility at odds over from the who is responsible for pollution Oyster entering the Bay. Recovery Partner- BY KARL BLANKENSHIP ship vessel The owners of the Conowingo Dam Robert Lee and the state of Maryland have come to to seed a legal blows over whether the utility can be restored forced to pay potentially billions of dollars reef in the over the coming decades to help clean up Tred Avon the Chesapeake Bay. River in The Maryland Department of the 2018. Lack Environment in late April issued a of funds decision that could require the Chicago- will prevent based utility to pay up to $172 million a more reef year to help control nutrient and sediment construc- pollution flowing past the Susquehanna tion this River dam as a condition of it getting a year. new federal operating license. (Dave In late May, Exelon fired back, saying Harp) those conditions imposed an “unfair burden” on the 94-foot-high hydroelectric facility that would cost $7 billion over the Corps rejects MD request to fund oyster restoration course of its requested 50-year operating Lack of federal funds urging the Corps to explicitly request license — a figure the company said was ≈ Feds give qualified OK to dredge restoration funding in future years. “orders of magnitude” more than the dam may halt reef construction oyster shells from Man O’ War Shoal. Cardin said he reinforced that mes- was worth. in the Tred Avon River. See article on page 7. sage with senior Corps leaders when It asked the MDE to reconsider its BY TIMOTHY B. WHEELER Tred Avon. A Cardin spokesman said he met with them in early April. decision, and filed challenges in both state Bay Oyster restoration in Mary- his office has requested an immediate Sarah Lazo, spokeswoman for the and federal courts. Exelon said it went to land, which has been beset by disputes meeting with Corps leaders to get an Baltimore District, said the District court at the same time it asked the MDE and delays the last two years, appears explanation. had planned to issue a contract this to reconsider its decision because of the headed for further delays. Cardin had said in April that he year to construct the 45 acres of reefs “seriousness of the issues at hand.” Despite pleas and pressure from was “pretty confident” that the Corps needed to complete reef construction “The dam itself does not produce any the state’s congressional delegation, would provide at least some fund- in the Tred Avon River, with a cost pollution,” Exelon said in a statement the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ing for oyster restoration in its Civil ranging from $3 million to $5 million. issued May 25. “Rather, the science left funding for oyster restoration out Works work plan, even though the She said the Corps headquarters pro- clearly shows that the pollutants that of its Civil Works work plan for the budget passed by Congress in March vides no explanation for why projects travel down the Susquehanna River, from current fiscal year, which ends Oct. 1. did not specifically allocate any are or are not included in the annual New York and Pennsylvania, are the That decision, disclosed in early June, money for such work. work plan. source of the nutrients and sediments that means the Corps’ Baltimore District Cardin said he had been optimistic Chris Judy, shellfish program flow into the Bay.” will have to shelve plans to complete because Congress has approved a director for the Maryland Depart- In response, the MDE said it would the construction of reefs in the Tred larger budget for the Corps than ment of Natural Resources, said state “vigorously defend our comprehensive Avon River on the Eastern Shore — at the White House had sought, and officials would work with the Corps to Conowingo plan to restore the river and least for now. members of Congress had expressed see “what the next steps are.” the Bay. The Hogan administration is Sens. Ben Cardin and Chris support for oyster restoration. Con- “This is exactly what we feared committed to using science, law and Van Hollen, both D-MD, expressed gressional rules prohibited earmark- would happen … It’s a real setback,” partnerships for environmental progress disappointment, noting that funding ing any of that extra funding for said Allison Colden, senior fisheries throughout the entire Chesapeake Bay was needed to continue the large-scale oyster restoration, but the budget bill watershed and the Conowingo plan is at restoration project under way in the passed in March contained language Oysters continues on page 9 Dam continues on page 27 Bay Journal • July-August 2018 2 is published by Bay Journal Media to inform Editor’s Note BAY JOURNAL the public about ecological, scientific, historic and cultural issues and events related to the Chesapeake Bay. The Bay Journal, circulation 35,000, is published monthly except in midsummer We’ll be out but still about this summer and midwinter. It is distributed free of charge. Bundles are available Summer is here, so it’s posting new material as warranted on our for distribution. Material may be reproduced, with permission time for our combined website, at bayjournal.com. and attribution. Publication is made possible by grants through July-August issue which There’s several other ways you can keep the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay gives our staff a chance to up with us: Program Office, the Campbell Foundation, the National Oceanic unwind and head outside, ≈ Sign up for our weekly e-newsletter and Atmospheric Administration’s Chesapeake Bay Office, the (and our readers a chance which each Monday presents everything Sumner T. McKnight Foundation, the Rauch Foundation, the to catch up with their Bay posted to our website the previous week. Fair Play Foundation, the Shared Earth Foundation, the Virginia Journals). Subscribe by going to our site, click the sub- Environmental Endowment, anonymous donors, and by reader We’re leaving you with scribe tab, and fill out the form. (You don’t contributions. Views expressed in the Bay Journal do not an issue packed with important stories. need to give up your hard copy subscription necessarily represent those of any funding agency or organization. The battle between Exelon and Mary- to get the newsletter). land over how much the Conowingo Dam ≈ “Like” our Facebook page, which high- For mailing list additions/changes, please use the form on this owner should contribute to the Bay cleanup lights all new Bay Journal articles as well as page or contact: Bay Journal, P.O. Box 222, Jacobus, PA 17407-0222 effort has far-reaching implications for the other content. E-mail: [email protected] Chesapeake. The Bay could use some help: ≈ Follow us on Twitter, which will keep BAY JOURNAL MEDIA The interim 2017 cleanup goal was missed, you alerted to new website posts and other and the EPA is warning states — especially Bay-related information. Bay Journal Media is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization with Pennsylvania — to ramp up efforts if they are a mission to further public education and awareness of issues to reach their 2025 objective. Welcome to Jeremy Cox affecting the Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic environment But there is some good news. Dolphins We recently welcomed Jeremy Cox to our by creating and distributing journalistic products. In addition are turning up in surprising numbers and in staff. Our first reporter on the Eastern Shore, to producing the Bay Journal, Bay Journal Media operates the surprising places, while the invasive Chinese Jeremy comes to us from the Daily Times in Bay Journal News Service, which distributes Bay Journal mitten crab doesn’t seem to be turning up Salisbury where he has worked since 2012. articles and original op-eds about the Chesapeake Bay or regional anywhere. Jeremy has been covering issues affecting environmental issues to more than 400 newspapers in the region, Last fall, Tom Horton and I sat down Maryland, Virginia and Delaware, and will reaching several million readers each month. for a long chat with University of Maryland help with our coverage of all three states. scientists Walt Boynton and Mike Kemp to Jeremy has been a reporter for daily news- Karl Blankenship, Executive Director talk about their long careers on the Bay, as papers since 2002, having previously worked Andrew Nolan, CPA, Chief Financial Officer well as the new signs of hope they see for the for the Florida Times-Union and the Daily STAFF estuary in their most recent work, which has News in Naples, FL. He’s been writing about just been published. In this issue, Tom writes the Bay since coming to Salisbury, but has Editor: Karl Blankenship ([email protected]) about their long careers in Chesapeake Born, plenty of previous environmental reporting; Managing Editor: Lara Lutz ([email protected]) while I write about how their work offers new Jeremy won awards for environmental cover- Associate Editor/Projects: Timothy B. Wheeler ([email protected]) hints of a Bay recovery. age while in Florida and participated in the CONTACT US Bay Journal News Service Editor: Tim Sayles ([email protected]) If you’re looking for something to do production of a 15-part series about the Gulf by mail: Copy/Design Editor: Kathleen A. Gaskell ([email protected]) during the summer, we have an expanded of Mexico while at the Naples Daily News. The Bay Journal Staff Writer: Jeremy Cox ([email protected]) five-pageBulletin Board section which offers Jeremy will continue to teach a course in 619 Oakwood Drive Staff Writer: Donna Morelli ([email protected]) all sorts of ideas.
Recommended publications
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • State of Maryland Action Plan For
    LARRY HOGAN Governor BOYD K. RUTHERFORD Lt. Governor KENNETH C. HOLT Secretary ELLINGTON CHURCHILL, JR. Deputy Secretary The attached document, the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development’s “State of Maryland Action Plan for Disaster Recovery – Grant #2”, was completed and approved in May 2014, prior to the accession of the current state administration under Governor Larry Hogan and Lt. Governor Boyd K. Rutherford. This document remains in force, and has been unchanged and unedited from its original format. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7800 HARKINS ROAD, LANHAM, MD 20706 301-429-7400, TOLL-FREE 800-756-0119, FAX 240-334-4732 State of Maryland Action Plan for Disaster Recovery – Grant #2 Community Development Block Grant Program Submitted to HUD on March 25, 2014 Approved by HUD May 23, 2014 Martin O’Malley, Governor Anthony G. Brown, Lieutenant Governor Raymond A. Skinner, Secretary Clarence J. Snuggs, Deputy Secretary Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032 Email: [email protected] Phone: 410/514-7256 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary II. Introduction III. Eligible Storm Events IV. Method of Distribution V. Application Review Process VI. Funding Recommendations VII. Proposed Use of Funding VIII. Needs Assessments a. Allegany County – Hurricane Sandy b. Dorchester County – Hurricane Sandy c. Garrett County – Hurricane Sandy d. Somerset County – Hurricane Sandy e. Charles County – Tropical Storm Lee IX. Risk Analysis for Infrastructure Projects X. Grant Administration XI. Regulations, Policies and Requirements for Funded Projects XII. Certifications This plan was prepared by the Maryland Deparment of Housing and Community Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Regular Session
    Martin O'Malley, Governor Ch. 431 Chapter 431 (House Bill 1472) AN ACT concerning Hunting Wild Waterfowl – Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and Wicomico Counties FOR the purpose of altering the location in which a person may hunt wild waterfowl by certain methods in the waters of Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and Wicomico counties; decreasing the distance from shore that the Department of Natural Resources prescribes by regulation for the hunting of wild waterfowl by certain methods in the waters of Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and Wicomico counties; and generally relating to hunting wild waterfowl in the waters of Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and Wicomico counties. BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article – Natural Resources Section 10–604 through 10–606 Annotated Code of Maryland (2007 Replacement Volume and 2009 Supplement) SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: Article – Natural Resources 10–604. (a) A person may hunt wild waterfowl while standing in water on the natural bottom only in the waters of the Susquehanna Flats, the nontidal waters of the Potomac River, THE WATERS OF TANGIER SOUND, FISHING BAY, MONIE BAY, MANOKIN RIVER, BIG ANNEMESSEX RIVER, POCOMOKE SOUND, AND KEDGES STRAITS IN THE WATERS OF DORCHESTER, SOMERSET, AND WICOMICO COUNTIES, and in other waters of the State in areas and on days the Department prescribes by regulation. (b) A person may hunt wild waterfowl while standing in water on the natural bottom at a licensed offshore stationary blind or blind site. (c) A person hunting wild waterfowl while standing in water on the natural bottom shall remain at least 250 yards from all offshore stationary blinds or blind sites or another person hunting wild waterfowl offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Watersheds.Pdf
    Watershed Code Watershed Name 02130705 Aberdeen Proving Ground 02140205 Anacostia River 02140502 Antietam Creek 02130102 Assawoman Bay 02130703 Atkisson Reservoir 02130101 Atlantic Ocean 02130604 Back Creek 02130901 Back River 02130903 Baltimore Harbor 02130207 Big Annemessex River 02130606 Big Elk Creek 02130803 Bird River 02130902 Bodkin Creek 02130602 Bohemia River 02140104 Breton Bay 02131108 Brighton Dam 02120205 Broad Creek 02130701 Bush River 02130704 Bynum Run 02140207 Cabin John Creek 05020204 Casselman River 02140305 Catoctin Creek 02130106 Chincoteague Bay 02130607 Christina River 02050301 Conewago Creek 02140504 Conococheague Creek 02120204 Conowingo Dam Susq R 02130507 Corsica River 05020203 Deep Creek Lake 02120202 Deer Creek 02130204 Dividing Creek 02140304 Double Pipe Creek 02130501 Eastern Bay 02141002 Evitts Creek 02140511 Fifteen Mile Creek 02130307 Fishing Bay 02130609 Furnace Bay 02141004 Georges Creek 02140107 Gilbert Swamp 02130801 Gunpowder River 02130905 Gwynns Falls 02130401 Honga River 02130103 Isle of Wight Bay 02130904 Jones Falls 02130511 Kent Island Bay 02130504 Kent Narrows 02120201 L Susquehanna River 02130506 Langford Creek 02130907 Liberty Reservoir 02140506 Licking Creek 02130402 Little Choptank 02140505 Little Conococheague 02130605 Little Elk Creek 02130804 Little Gunpowder Falls 02131105 Little Patuxent River 02140509 Little Tonoloway Creek 05020202 Little Youghiogheny R 02130805 Loch Raven Reservoir 02139998 Lower Chesapeake Bay 02130505 Lower Chester River 02130403 Lower Choptank 02130601 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill 1472
    HOUSE BILL 1472 M2 (0lr3400) ENROLLED BILL — Environmental Matters/Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs — Introduced by Dorchester County Delegation, Somerset County Delegation, and Wicomico County Delegation Read and Examined by Proofreaders: _______________________________________________ Proofreader. _______________________________________________ Proofreader. Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this _______ day of _______________ at ________________________ o’clock, ________M. ______________________________________________ Speaker. CHAPTER ______ 1 AN ACT concerning 2 Hunting Wild Waterfowl – Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and Wicomico 3 Counties 4 FOR the purpose of altering the location in which a person may hunt wild waterfowl 5 by certain methods in the waters of Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and 6 Wicomico counties; decreasing the distance from shore that the Department of 7 Natural Resources prescribes by regulation for the hunting of wild waterfowl by 8 certain methods in the waters of Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and 9 Wicomico counties; and generally relating to hunting wild waterfowl in the 10 waters of Dorchester, St. Mary’s, Somerset, and Wicomico counties. 11 BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 12 Article – Natural Resources 13 Section 10–604 through 10–606 EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW. [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. Underlining indicates amendments to bill. Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by amendment. Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. *hb1472* 2 HOUSE BILL 1472 1 Annotated Code of Maryland 2 (2007 Replacement Volume and 2009 Supplement) 3 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 4 MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 5 Article – Natural Resources 6 10–604.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset County, Maryland
    - H L 350 350 S S t t e e o o s s m r m r e e SSoommeerrsseett 350350 H L - Annemessex River landscape, Aerial photograph by Joey Gardner, 2016 Native Americans, Explorers and Settlement of Somerset n August 22, 1666, Cecil Calvert, Lord proprietor of the province of Maryland, authorized legislation creating OSomerset County, and 350 years later in this anniversary year, we look back as well as forward in celebration to honor and cherish our past as we continue to live here in the present and future. Somerset’s first inhabitants, however, were the native tribes of the lower Eastern Shore. Native American occupation of the region dates back thousands of years; its earliest inhabitants occupied a landscape far different than today with much lower sea levels. Spanning over fifteen to twenty thousand years, native American habitation matured from hunter-gathers to settled communities of tribes who resided along the region’s A characteristic Paleo-Indian fluted numerous waterways, many of which still carry their names. The Pocomoke, Manokin, projectile point from Maryland’s Eastern Annemessex, Monie and Wicomico waterways are named for these native tribes. Shore, Nancy Kurtz. Native American occupation is also represented by the thousands of artifacts that turn up in the soil, or through the written historical record as Anglo-American explorers, traders and ultimately settlers interacted with them across the peninsula. One of the earliest explorers to leave a written record of his visit, describing the local inhabitants as well as their activities was Giovanni da Verrazano, who, during the 1520s, traveled along what later became Somerset County.
    [Show full text]
  • Manokin River Chosen for Oyster Restoration Ten Sites Now Selected Under Chesapeake Bay Program Goal
    Media Release | 08-13-2019 Manokin River chosen for oyster restoration Ten sites now selected under Chesapeake Bay Program goal Annapolis, MD – The Chesapeake Bay Program is pleased to announce that the Manokin River has been selected as the tenth Chesapeake Bay tributary Media Contact: for large-scale oyster reef restoration. The Chesapeake Bay Watershed • Rachel Felver Agreement calls for the restoration of the native oyster population in 10 Director of tributaries by 2025—and the Manokin River is the final tributary to be Communications selected for this Chesapeake Bay Program partnership effort. (410) 267-5740 The Manokin River joins four other large-scale Maryland oyster restoration We Recommend: sites: Harris Creek and the Little Choptank, Tred Avon and Upper St. Mary’s • Blog rivers. Situated off Tangier Sound, along Maryland’s Eastern Shore, the • NOAA Chesapeake Bay Manokin River is over 16,000 acres and has been an oyster sanctuary area Office Oyster Fish Facts since 2010. • ChesapeakeProgress: Oysters In addition to the Maryland sites, large-scale oyster restoration is also taking • NOAA Fisheries place in five locations in Virginia: Great Wicomico, Lafayette, Lower York, highlights Chesapeake Lynnhaven and Piankatank rivers. Bay oyster restoration Facts The oyster outcome in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement seeks to continually increase finfish and shellfish habitat and water quality benefits from restored oyster populations. It also looks to restore native oyster habitat and populations in 10 tributaries by 2025 and ensure their protection. Ten Chesapeake Bay tributaries have been selected for oyster restoration: Harris Creek and Little Choptank, Manokin, Tred Avon and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Area's #1 Fishing & Hunting Outfitter
    Dear Angler: Here in Maryland, we need only look to our State Seal — depicting the fisherman and the ploughman — for proof that fishing really is part of our heritage. It’s a fun, affordable and accessible activity for all ages, and a great excuse to get our children away from video and computer games and into the great outdoors! Approximately 700,000 adults and thousands of young people fish each year in Maryland, with an estimated annual impact of $1 billion on our economy. Gov. Martin O’Malley and Sec. John R. Griffin More than a third of our anglers visit from out of state, testimony to the value and quality of our great fishing resources. We are very fortunate to have expert biologists and managers – working to- gether with our Sport Fisheries, Tidal Fisheries and Oyster Advisory Commissions, and our Coastal Fisheries Advisory Committee, to guide fisheries management across our State. We are also very fortunate to have you -- committed conserva- tionists and advocates – working with us. Your license revenues support protection and enhancement of Maryland’s fishery resources, research and management activities, expanded public access and enhanced law enforcement. And we look forward to strengthening our partnership with you as we work toward our goals for a restored Chesapeake Bay, thriving freshwater streams, and healthy abundant fish populations. Thank you for being a part of a great cultural tradition, and here’s wishing you a terrific year of fishing in Maryland. Martin O’Malley John R. Griffin Governor Secretary About the Cover: This edition of the Maryland Fishing Guide is dedicated to Frances McFaden, who retired from public service after 43 years as a steadfast, ever-helpful, and resourceful Maryland state worker.
    [Show full text]
  • Citations Year to Date Printed: Thursday April 20 2017 Citations Enterd in Past 7 Days Are Highlighted Yellow
    Commonwealth of Virginia - Virginia Marine Resources Commission Lewis Gillingham, Tournament Director - Newport News, Virginia 23607 2016 Citations Year To Date Printed: Thursday April 20 2017 Citations Enterd in Past 7 Days Are Highlighted Yellow Species Caught Angler Address Release Weight Lngth Area Technique Bait 1 AMBERJACK 2016-08-10 WAYNE SEYMOUR VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Y 50.5 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 2 AMBERJACK 2016-08-10 CHAD CRUEA VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Y 52.5 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 3 AMBERJACK 2016-08-10 KEITH TREWICK VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Y 53.5 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 4 AMBERJACK 2016-08-10 DAVID BARNHART VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Y 51 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 5 AMBERJACK 2016-07-29 LOUIS HOCKER MECHANICSBURG, PA Y 54 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 6 AMBERJACK 2016-07-10 MICHAEL DELBRIDGE CHESAPEAKE, VA Y 52 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 7 AMBERJACK 2016-07-10 ROBERTSON THOMAS VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Y 51.5 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 8 AMBERJACK 2016-07-09 DAVID STEPHENS VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Y 52 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 9 AMBERJACK 2016-07-02 GABRIEL SAVA POQUOSON, VA Y 53.5 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 10 AMBERJACK 2016-07-02 CHARLES T. SOUTHALL POQUOSON, VA Y 51 SOUTHERN TOWER (NAVY BAIT FISHING LIVE BAIT (FISH) 11 BLACK DRUM 2016-11-27 WILLIAM HARRINGTON HUDGINS, VA Y 48 TRIANGLE WRECKS JIGGING LURE(UNSPECIFIED) 12 BLACK DRUM 2016-11-19 DAVID C.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Shore of Virginia Regional Dredging Needs Assessment
    Eastern Shore of Virginia Regional Dredging Needs Assessment Prepared for: Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program Prepared by: Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission This project was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant #NA15NOS4190164 of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface i Acknowledgements i Executive Summary ii I. INTRODUCTION 1 Geographical and Jurisdictional Setting 1 Mainland Peninsula 1 Islands and Tidal Marshes 2 Eastern Shore Waterways 2 Ecomomic Justification for Need 2 Funding and Maintenance 3 USCG Aids to Navigation 4 Local Commitment to Maintenance 4 II. METHODOLOGY 5 III. RESULTS 9 Federal Waterways 9 CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR 17 CHESCONESSEX CREEK 18 CHINCOTEAGUE BAY GREENBACKVILLE 18 CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE 19 CHINCOTEAGUE INLET 19 DEEP CREEK (ACCOMACK CO.) 21 GUILFORD CREEK 21 LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER 22 NANDUA CREEK 23 OCCOHANNOCK CREEK 23 ONANCOCK RIVER 24 OYSTER CHANNEL 25 PARKER CREEK 25 QUINBY CREEK 26 STARLING CREEK 27 TANGIER CHANNELS 27 WISHART POINT CHANNEL 29 WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (WCV) 29 Non-Federal Channels, Creeks, and Waterways of Concern 37 CHINCOTEAGUE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD BASE 41 FOLLY CREEK TO METOMPKIN INLET 41 KINGS CREEK 41 METOMPKIN INLET 41 GARGATHY CREEK 42 GREAT MACHIPONGO INLET AND CHANNEL 42 HUNGARS CREEK 42 HUNTING CREEK 43 NASSAWADOX CREEK (and Church and Warehouse Creeks) 43 PUNGOTEAGUE CREEK 45 RED BANK CREEK 45 QUINBY – EASTERN END OF FEDERAL CHANNEL TO QUINBY INLET 45 WACHAPREAGUE CHANNEL AND DAY MARKER 122 TO WACHAPREAGUE INLET 46 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • March 16, 2020 RFP CRD #20-01 TITLE
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ISSUE DATE: March 16, 2020 RFP CRD #20-01 TITLE: Shell dredging and shell planting for Virginia’s portion of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. COMMODITY CODE: 96834/95900 ISSUING AGENCY: Commonwealth of Virginia Marine Resources Commission 380 Fenwick Road, Bldg. 96 Fort Monroe, Virginia 23651 WORK LOCATION: James River, City of Newport News, Rappahannock River, Lancaster and Middlesex Counties, York River, York and Gloucester Counties, Piankatank River, Chesapeake Bay, Mathews County, Great Wicomico River, Lancaster County, and Tangier Sound, Pocomoke Sound, Accomack County, Eastern Branch Elizabeth River, Chesapeake. PERIOD OF CONTRACT: From date of award to September 30, 2020. SEALED PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL April 6, 2020, AT 2:00 P.M. FOR FURNISHING THE SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN. LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. ALL INQUIRIES FOR INFORMATION SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: Andrew Button Telephone (757) 247-2121 SEND PROPOSALS DIRECTLY TO: Lt. Bob Griffin Operations Station 30 Jefferson Ave. Newport News, Virginia 23607 (757) 247-2265 OR HAND DELIVER TO: Lt. Bob Griffin Operations Station 30 Jefferson Ave. Newport News, Virginia 23607 IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) AND ALL THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED IN THIS RFP, THE UNDERSIGNED FIRM HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES TO FURNISH, IF SELECTED, THE SERVICES DESCRIBED AT THE PRICE INDICATED IN SECTION XI, PRICING SCHEDULE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED SIGNED PROPOSED OR AS MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY SUBSEQUENT NEGOTIATION, AND THE UNDERSIGNED FIRM
    [Show full text]
  • How the Counties Got Their Boundaries
    How The Counties got their Boundaries 1632 – Today 387 years of expansion, grants, divisions, revisions, surveys and litigation Leonard Calvert Alicia Crossland 1550-1611 1552-1587 In 1592, the Catholic, Leonard Calvert had to sign a promise of conformity to the Anglican Church. He was banned Sir George Calvert from employing any Catholic servants. 1st Lord Baltimore 1580-1632 At age of 12, George and his brother Christopher, were sent to a Protestant tutor for their education. The seeds for a place of Religious Freedom may have been planted at an early age. Sir George Calvert James I of England 1st Lord Baltimore 1566-1625 1580-1632 (Reign 1603-1625) George came to know Sir Robert Cecil, the spymaster to Queen Elizabeth, and carry packets for him. When King James I began his reign, Robert Cecil became the King’s Secretary of State and George Calvert came along as an invaluable aid to him. In 1610, Calvert became an advisor/supporter of the King and in 1618, James I appointed him as one of his two Secretaries of State. King James I made Calvert the first baron of Baltimore in 1625, in recognition of his services and loyalty to the Crown. The “Manor of Baltimore” was a 2,300-acre estate in County Longford, Ireland. When James I died his son, Charles I, also called on Calvert to assist him in matters of state. Sir George Calvert – Investment/Colonizing in the New World 1609 - Investment in Second Virginia Company 1609 - Investment in the East India Company 1614 - Increase investment in East India Company 1620 - Purchase a tract of land in
    [Show full text]