DOCSLIB.ORG

CNE DEPOSIT (Mine Lease 251) Bathurst Mining Camp, New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CNE DEPOSIT (Mine Lease 251) Bathurst Mining Camp, New CNE DEPOSIT (Mine Lease 251) Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada Environmental Impact Assessment Registration April 5, 2012 Prepared by: Derek Brown, P.Geo Kevin Vienneau Stan Stricker, P. Geol John Duncan, P. Geo 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Overview .............................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Proponent......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Property Ownership ......................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Background ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Need For The Project........................................................................................................ 9 1.6 Project Schedule ............................................................................................................. 11 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Geographic Location and Access ......................................................................................... 12 2.2 Rehabilitation of Previously Registered Project .................................................................. 13 2.3 Resources and Mine Life ..................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Mining.................................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.1 Mine Development ....................................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Mine Methods and Open Pit Parameters ..................................................................... 18 2.4.3 Mine Equipment ........................................................................................................... 21 2.4.4 Production Rate and Schedule ..................................................................................... 21 2.5 Project Infrastructure .......................................................................................................... 21 2.5.1 Ore Crushing, Storage and Loading .............................................................................. 22 2.5.2 Waste Rock Storage ...................................................................................................... 22 2.5.3 Overburden Storage ..................................................................................................... 22 2.5.4 Storage Facilities ........................................................................................................... 23 2.5.5 Site Roads ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.5.6 Site Security .................................................................................................................. 23 2.6 Site Preparation ................................................................................................................... 24 2.7 Water Management and Treatment ................................................................................... 24 2.7.1 Solid Waste ................................................................................................................... 26 2.7.2 Sanitary Waste .............................................................................................................. 26 2.7.3 Hazardous Waste .......................................................................................................... 26 ii Stratabound Minerals Corp. EIA Registration – CNE Deposit March 2012 2.8 Site Access and Ore Transport ............................................................................................ 26 2.9 Power Supply and Distribution ........................................................................................... 27 2.10 Communication Systems ................................................................................................... 27 2.11 Project Emissions .............................................................................................................. 27 2.12 Emergency Response ........................................................................................................ 28 2.13 Health and Safety .............................................................................................................. 28 2.14 Decommissioning and Reclamation .................................................................................. 28 2.14.1 Mine Pit....................................................................................................................... 28 2.14.2 Surface Facilities ......................................................................................................... 29 2.14.3 Waste and Overburden Pads ...................................................................................... 29 2.14.4 Settling Ponds ............................................................................................................. 29 3.0 EXISTING ENVIROMENT .......................................................................................................... 30 3.1 Physical Environment .......................................................................................................... 30 3.1.1 Physiography ................................................................................................................ 30 3.1.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.3 Soil and Overburden ..................................................................................................... 40 3.1.4 Geology Regional .......................................................................................................... 42 3.1.5 Geology Project ............................................................................................................ 43 3.1.6 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................... 46 3.1.7 Surface Drainage ........................................................................................................... 46 3.2 Terrestrial Environment ...................................................................................................... 47 3.2.1 Vegetation .................................................................................................................... 47 3.2.2 Wildlife .......................................................................................................................... 48 3.2.3 Rare Species .................................................................................................................. 50 3.3 Aquatic Environment ........................................................................................................... 50 3.3.1 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................... 50 3.3.2 Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 52 3.3.3 Sediment Quality .......................................................................................................... 61 iii Stratabound Minerals Corp. EIA Registration – CNE Deposit March 2012 3.3.4 Fish and Fish Habitat..................................................................................................... 70 3.4 Human Environment ........................................................................................................... 73 3.4.1 Labour Force ................................................................................................................. 76 3.4.2 Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 78 3.4.3 Traditional Land Use ..................................................................................................... 79 3.4.4 Archaeology and Heritage ............................................................................................ 79 4.0 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MITIGATION ................................................................................. 80 4.1 Physical Environment .......................................................................................................... 81 4.2 Terrestrial Environment ...................................................................................................... 82 4.3 Aquatic Environment ........................................................................................................... 84 4.3.1 Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 84 4.3.2 Surface Hydrology......................................................................................................... 84 4.3.3 Fish and Fish Habitat..................................................................................................... 85 4.4 Human Environment ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A 3-D Historical Data Integration Study in the Heath Steele Mining Camp, Bathurst New Brunswick, Canada
    3D Theatre Presentation _________________________________________________________________________________________ Paper 123 New Eyes on Old Data: A 3-D Historical Data Integration Study in the Heath Steele Mining Camp, Bathurst New Brunswick, Canada. Vander Most, A. [1], de Kemp, E. A. [2], Hannington, M. D. [1], Goodfellow, W. D. [2], Peter, J. M. [2] _________________________ 1. University of Ottawa 2. Geological Survey of Canada ABSTRACT At a time when mineral deposit discoveries are becoming more challenging, explorationists need to investigate alternative ways for ore targeting. 3-D GIS provides a critical environment for understanding the characteristics and the environments of ore deposits, reducing the risk in exploration. Many larger companies have accumulated extensive databases through past exploration programs or through mergers and acquisitions of other companies. A considerable amount of archived and historical data may be available from developed mines that are now closed; although these data may have been used in earlier exploration programs, they are rarely integrated into linked data sets that can be effectively applied to follow-up ore targeting exercises. When revisiting historical data a systematic approach is required for migrating information from paper records to fully linked data sets suitable for interpretation in 3- D GIS. Examining inherent relationships between data sets, assessing spatial quality and availability of data at various scales and judging their relevance to exploration models are all critical steps in this data characterization process. As an example of the process of restoring historical mine data to a condition suitable for analysis in 3-D GIS, we have compiled records of the distribution of ore- associated iron formation from the massive sulfide deposits at Heath Steele, in the Bathurst Mining Camp, northern New Brunswick.
    [Show full text]
  • ~Nalla~R~C (CANADA a GEOLOGY FIELD "GUIDE to SELECTED SITES in NEWFOUNDLAND, NOVA SCOTIA
    D~s)COVER~NGROCK~~ ~j!NERAl~ ~NfO)FOs)S~l5) ~NAllA~r~C (CANADA A GEOLOGY FIELD "GUIDE TO SELECTED SITES IN NEWFOUNDLAND, NOVA SCOTIA, PRINCE EDV\JARDISLAND7 AND NEW BRUNSWICK 7_".-- ~ _. ...._ .•-- ~.- Peter Wallace. Editor Atlantic Geoscience Society Department of Earth Sciences La Societe G60scientifique Dalhousie University de L'Atlantique Halifax, Nova Scotia AGS Special Publication 14 • DISCOVERING ROCKS, MINERALS AND FOSSILS IN ATLANTIC CANADA A Geology Field Guide to Selected Sites in Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick • Peter Wallace, editor Department of Earth Sciences Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia Atlantic Geoscience Society La Societe Geoscientifique de L'Atlantique • AGS Special Publication • @ 1998 Atlantic Geoscience Society Department of Earth Sciences Dalhousie University 1236 Henry Street, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada B3H3J5 This book was produced with help from The Canadian Geological Foundation, The Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, and The Atlantic Geoscience Society. ISBN 0-9696009-9-2 AGS Special Publication Number . 14.. I invite you to join the Atlantic Geoscience Society, write clo The Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University (see above) Cover Photo Cape Split looking west into the Minas Channel, Nova Scotia. The split is caused by erosion along North-South faults cutting the Triassic-Jurassic-aged North Mountain Basalt and is the terminal point of a favoured hike of geologists and non-geologists alike. Photo courtesy of Rob • Fensome, Biostratigrapher,
    [Show full text]
  • The Williams Brook Gold Discovery – Northern New Brunswick
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY SYMPOSIUM FREDERICTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA JUNE 1ST-4TH, 2009 EDITED BY DAVID R. LENTZ, KATHLEEN G. THORNE, & KRISTY-LEE BEAL VOLUME I All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission from the publisher. ISBN 978-1-55131-136-4 ©2009 AAG PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY SYMPOSIUM FREDERICTON, NEW BRUNSWICK CANADA JUNE 1ST-4TH, 2009 EDITED BY DAVID R. LENTZ KATHLEEN G. THORNE KRISTY-LEE BEAL VOLUME I NORTH ATLANTIC MINERALS SYMPOSIUM ................................................................................ 501 Mass change constraints and hydrothermal alteration of felsic volcanic rocks that host the Restigouche Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada ............................................................................................................................................503 Amanuel Bein1 & David R. Lentz1 ..............................................................................................503 Results of 2008 exploration program Mount Pleasant Property: geochemistry, mineralogy, and deposit modeling of Sn-In and WO3-MoS2 zones...........................................................................507 Trevor Boyd1 & Gustaaf Kooiman1 ............................................................................................507 The Nash Creek Zn–Pb–Ag deposit,
    [Show full text]
  • Precious Metal Distribution in the Epigenetic Stringer Sulphide Zone at the Brunswick No
    ATI..ANilc GEOLOGY 87 Precious metal distribution In the Epigenetic Stringer Sulphide Zone at the Brunswick No. 12 deposit, Bathurst, New Brunswick 1 2 3 D. Lentz , P. Giggie , B. Luff2 and W. Goodfellow 1Geo/ogical Survey of Canada, P.O. Box 50, Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 3Zl, Canada 2Brunswick Mining and Smelting Corporation, P.O. Box 3000, Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 371J, Canada 3Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario KJA OE8, Canada There has been little published information on the occur­ ( 10 to 50) occur in portions of the stringer sulphide minerali­ rence, distribution, and abundance of gold in massive sulphide zation that exhibits intense silicic alteration. The typical deposits of the Bathurst Mining Camp although it is extracted massive sulphide ore grade is 0.55 to 0.72 g/t Au, although as a byproduct during the smelting of both the Cu and Pb the secondary Pb-oxide-bearing ore contains up to 2.25 g/t concentrates (4.1 and 0.9 g/t, respectively) from the Brun­ Au resulting in a high Ag/Au (140) ratio. The As/S ratio is swickNo. 12 deposit, with a total annual production of280 to high (0.02 to 0.2) but irregular in the stringer mineralization 310 kg representing a 12% recovery. Gold is commonly compared to 0.01 for the typical ore. This is consistent with enriched in the hydrothermal feeder system (stringer sulphides) the pronounced decrease in As solubility as arsenopyrite with to the exhalative sulphide ores. Therefore, as part of a larger decreasing temperatures and increasing oxygen fugacity.
    [Show full text]
  • SERIES Tions Are Reflected on the Physiographic Map of the Area
    GEOSCIENCE CANADA Volume 46 2019 137 SERIES tions are reflected on the physiographic map of the area. Despite abundant glacial deposits, we now know that the camp comprises several groups of Ordovician predominantly vol- canic rocks, belonging to the Dunnage Zone, which overlie older sedimentary rocks belonging to the Gander Zone. The volcanic rocks formed during rifting of a submarine volcanic arc on the continental margin of Ganderia, ultimately leading to the formation of a Sea of Japan-style basin that is referred to as the Tetagouche-Exploits back-arc basin. The massive sul- phide deposits are mostly associated with early-stage, felsic volcanic rocks and formed during the Middle Ordovician upon or near the sea floor by precipitation from metalliferous fluids escaping from submarine hot springs. The history of mineral exploration in the Bathurst Mining Camp can be divided into six periods: a) pre-1952, b) 1952- 1958, c) 1959-1973, d) 1974-1988, and e) 1989-2000, over which time 45 massive sulphide deposits were discovered. Prior to 1952, only one deposit was known, but the efforts of three men, Patrick (Paddy) W. Meahan, Dr. William J. Wright, and Dr. Graham S. MacKenzie, focused attention on the min- eral potential of northern New Brunswick, which led to the Steven R. McCutcheon1 and James A. Walker2 discovery of the Brunswick No. 6 deposit in October 1952. In the 1950s, 29 deposits were discovered, largely resulting from 1McCutcheon Geo-Consulting, the application of airborne surveys, followed by ground geo- 1935 Palmer Drive, Bathurst, New Brunswick, E2A 4X7, Canada physical methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: Data Integration, Geophysical Modelling and Implications for Exploration
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences The Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: Data Integration, Geophysical Modelling and Implications for Exploration Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2018-0048.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 31-Aug-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Ugalde, Hernan; Brock University, Earth Sciences Morris, William; School of Geography and Geology van Staal, DraftCees; Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Bathurst Mining Camp, Geophysical compilation, Geophysical Keyword: interpretation, Geophysical modelling, 3D Geological Modelling Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Geophysics applied to mineral exploration Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 50 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: Data Integration, Geophysical Modelling and 8 Implications for Exploration 9 10 Ugalde, H.1, Morris, W.A.2, van Staal, C.3 11 1Brock University, Department of Earth Sciences, St. Catharines, ON 12 2McMaster University, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, Hamilton, ON 13 3Geological Survey of Canada, Vancouver, BC 14 15 16 Draft 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 50 17 ABSTRACT 18 The Bathurst Mining Camp (BMC) is one of Canada's oldest mining districts for volcanogenic 19 massive sulfide (VMS) deposits. Most of the 46 known deposits were discovered in the 1950s 20 using a combination of geological and geophysical methods. However, renewed exploration 21 efforts over the past 15 years have not been as successful as one would expect for the level 22 of expenditure the camp has gone through.
    [Show full text]
  • Bathurst Mining Camp Site Visit Presentation October 2018
    Bathurst Mining Camp Site Visit Presentation October 2018 TSX: TV | www.trevali.com TSX: TV | www.trevali.com Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements: This presentation contains “forward-looking information” (also referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”) under the provisions of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those in respect of: the economic outlook for the mining industry; expectations regarding metal prices; the timing and amount of estimated future production; the current and planned commercial operations, initiatives and objectives in respect of certain projects of Trevali Mining Corporation (“Trevali” or “TV”), including the Caribou mine, the Restigouche project, the Murray Brook deposit and the Halfmile and Stratmat deposits (collectively, the “Projects”); the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; the realization of mineral reserve estimates, changes in mineral resources and conversion of mineral resources to proven and probable mineral reserves; Trevali’s current and planned exploration initiatives; strategies and
    [Show full text]
  • Siluro-Devonian Tectonostratigraphic Relationships in the Portage Brook
    Atlantic Geology 19 Siluro-Devonian tectonostratigraphic relationships in the Portage Brook area, northern New Brunswick: implications for timing of deformational events in the Bathurst Mining Camp S J. Gower and S.R. McCutcheon Geological Surveys Branch, New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, P.O. Box 50, Bathurst, New BrunswickE2A 3Z1, Canada Date Received April 9, 1996 Date Accepted October 9, 1996 In the Portage Brook area, Siluro-Devonian rocks of the Chaleurs Bay Synclinorium are juxtaposed against polydeformed Cambro-Ordovician rocks of the Bathurst Mining Camp along the northerly trending Portage Brook Fault. Rocks of the Chaleurs Group have been identified for the first time west of the Portage Brook Fault, and are subdivided into four lithological units: conglomerate, sandstone and siltstone of the Simpsons Field Formation; mafic volcanic rocks of the Bryant Point Formation; felsic volcanic rocks of the Benjamin Formation; and thickly bedded, brownish grey to reddish grey sandstone of the Greys Gulch Formation. The presence of two pre-deposi- tional cleavages in Ordovician pebbles in the middle Wenlockian to late Ludlovian Simpsons Field Formation indicates that D2 deformation in the Bathurst Mining Camp started prior to the Late Silurian, i.e., earlier than considered by some workers. This observation is supported by the truncation of at least two strong fabrics in Cambro-Ordovician rocks by Late Silurian/Early Devonian mafic intrusions. An alkali granite (radiometrically dated at 414 +11/-1 Ma) clearly intruded, and altered to hornfels, clastic rocks of the Simpsons Field Formation. The granite appears to grade laterally into and to be coeval with volcanic rocks of the Benjamin Formation, thus suggesting that the age of the intrusion is close to the lower error limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Speciation of Gold in Massive Sulfides of the Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada
    851 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 42, pp. 851-871 (2004) ABUNDANCE AND SPECIATION OF GOLD IN MASSIVE SULFIDES OF THE BATHURST MINING CAMP, NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA SEAN H. McCLENAGHAN§ AND DAVID R. LENTZ Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada LOUIS J. CABRI 99 Fifth Avenue, Suite 122, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5P5, and Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B 3X5, Canada ABSTRACT Massive sulfide deposits of Zn–Pb–Cu–Ag type in the Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, are hosted within a Middle Ordovician bimodal volcanic and sedimentary sequence that has undergone complex polyphase deformation and associated regional metamorphism to the lower- to upper-greenschist grade. These factors are partly responsible for the present geometry and textural modification of these hydrothermal deposits, originally formed on the seafloor. Despite the importance of heteroge- neous ductile deformation, some primary features are evident, in particular fine-grained colloform pyrite and base- and precious- metal zonation within many of these deposits. The average Au content (bulk instrumental neutron-activation analyses; n = 215) of massive sulfides from 43 deposits in the Bathurst Mining Camp is 0.85 ppm, with values as high as 6.86 ppm. Positive correlations of Au content with Ag (r’ = 0.53), As (r’ = 0.57) and Sb = (r’ = 0.65) suggest that Au is mainly associated with arsenian pyrite and a distal suite of elements (Au + Sb + As ± Ag). The submicroscopic Au contents of pyrite and arsenopyrite in eight deposits with elevated bulk Au contents were investigated using a Cameca IMS–4f secondary-ion mass spectrometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Trevali Provides Bathurst Mining Camp Update
    Trevali Mining Corporation 1400 – 1199 West Hastings Street Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA V6E 3T5 Telephone: (604) 488-1661 www.trevali.com NEWS RELEASE Trevali Provides Bathurst Mining Camp Update Restigouche Drill Highlights: 15 metres grading 8% Zn, 6.4% Pb & 44 g/t Ag; 21.3 metres grading 6.5% Zn, 5.2% Pb & 65 g/t Ag; and 17.2 metres grading 8.7% Zn, 7.2% Pb & 199 g/t Ag TV-NR-18-13 July 5, 2018 Vancouver, British Columbia: Trevali Mining Corporation (“Trevali” or the “Company”) (TSX: TV, BVL: TV; OTCQX: TREVF, Frankfurt: 4TI) provides an update on exploration and development activities to support its Bathurst Mining Camp “Life-of-Mill” strategy in New Brunswick, Canada (Figure 1). Figure 1: Trevali Projects in the Bathurst Mining Camp (New Brunswick) (Note: Red stars are 100%-owned by Trevali; Blue stars are advanced properties under option). Trevali Mining Corporation 2 July 5, 2018 NR-18-13 – Continued “The combination of ongoing exploration success and strategic acquisitions in the Bathurst Mining Camp has delivered a strong pipeline to support our life-of-mill plan at Caribou,” stated Dr. Mark Cruise, Trevali President and CEO. “Trevali has solidified a dominant land position in order to optimize milling operations in the region for the benefit of all stakeholders.” Trevali currently owns four deposits and has the option to acquire two advanced deposits in the Bathurst Mining Camp (“BMC”) (Figure 1). Anchored by the Caribou Mill and related infrastructure, the Company’s focus is to complete advanced geological and engineering studies in order to facilitate long- term production based on the Company’s life-of-mill strategy (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Unleashing Canada's Zinc Potential
    UNLEASHING CANADA’S ZINC POTENTIAL “A Unique and Strategic Zinc Exploration Portfolio” Corporate Presentation – July 2019 CSE:EZNC OTC:CSE:ETZCFEZNC OTC:ETZCF www.easternzinc.comwww.easternzinc.com CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, are "forward-looking information" with respect to Eastern Zinc Corp within the meaning of applicable securities laws including, without limitation economic estimates and any statements related to estimated mining costs. Eastern Zinc Corp provides forward-looking statements for the purpose of conveying information about current expectations and plans relating to the future and readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. By its nature, this information is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties that may be general or specific and which give rise to the possibility that expectations, forecasts, predictions, projections or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that assumptions may not be correct and that objectives, strategic goals and priorities will not be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to exploration findings, results and recommendations, as well as those risks and uncertainties identified and reported in Eastern Zinc Corp’s public filings under its SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. Although Eastern Zinc Corp has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemostratigraphy and Depositional Environment of an Ordovician Sedimentary Section Across the Miramichi Group - Tetagouche Group Contact, Northeastern New Brunswick
    Atlantic Geology 101 Chemostratigraphy and depositional environment of an Ordovician sedimentary section across the Miramichi Group - Tetagouche Group contact, northeastern New Brunswick David R. Lentz1, Wayne D. Goodfellow2, and Earnest Brooks3 'New Brunswick Geological Surveys Branch, P.O. Box 50, Bathurst, New BrunswickE2A 3Z1, Canada 2Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada 3Geological Consultant, 1235 Johnson Avenue, Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 3T4, Canada Date Received June 23, 1995 Date Accepted November 3, 1995 A thick section of Ordovician sedimentary rocks underlies and overlies felsic to mafic volcanic rocks of the Tetagouche Group, Bathurst Mining Camp. The dark grey quartzose slates and siltstones of the Patrick Brook Formation (Miramichi Group) occur below the volcanic rocks, whereas the dark grey to black slates and siltstones of the Boucher Brook Formation (Tetagouche Group) are intercalated with the volcanic rocks and overlie the sequence. The Miramichi-Tetagouche contact represents the interpreted Gander-Dunnage boundary in northeast­ ern New Brunswick. Distinguishing between these two similar formations is important for stratigraphic and geo- tectonic interpretations of the Bathurst Mining Camp and for exploration in these sequences. The geochemical composition of a semi-conformable section of rocks from the Boucher Brook (Middle to Late? Ordovician) and Patrick Brook (Early to Middle Ordovician) formations was determined to identify geochemical chemostratigraphic discriminants, as well as to determine the depositional environment in which these were deposited. The high AI2O3 and distinctly higher high-field-strength elements (LREE, Th, HREE, and Y) in the Patrick Brook rocks are characteristic of mature sedimentary rocks and indicate intense chemical weathering (tropical environment) in the source regions, which is consistent with their compositional similarity to Avalon-derived shales analogous to Gander Zone sedimentary rocks.
    [Show full text]