Windham Mountain Sporting Club
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the proposed WINDHAM MOUNTAIN SPORTING CLUB Trailside Road Town of Windham, Greene County, New York Applicant: Tuck Eastside Partners, L.P. 34 Salisbury Road Darien, CT 06820 Lead Agency: Town of Windham Planning Board 371 State Route 296 Hensonville, NY 12439 Attn. Maureen Anshanslin, Chairwoman (518) 734-4170 DEIS: Date of Lead Agency Acceptance of DEIS: March 1, 2012 DEIS Public Comment Period: March 2, 2012 to April 30, 2012 DEIS Public Hearing Date: April 5, 2012 FEIS Issuance Date: October 2, 2014 LIST OF EIS PREPARERS The LA Group, PC 40 Long Alley Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 587-8100 Attn. Kevin Franke Kaaterskill Associates PO Box 1020 Cairo, NY 12413 (518) 622-9667 Attn. Darrin Elsom Design Management, LLC 1 N. Pack Square, Ste. 149 Asheville, NC 28801 (828) 258-1818 Attn. Bruce Hazzard Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP One Commerce Plaza Albany, NY 12260 (518) 487-7619 Attn. Daniel A. Ruzow AKRF, Inc. 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 (464) 388-9554 Attn. Peter Liebowitz Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP 17 Computer Drive West Albany, NY 12205 (518) 446-0396 Attn. Alanna Moran Hudson Mohawk Archaeological Consultants, LLC 153 Second Ave. Troy, NY 12180 (518) 237-5637 Attn. Jason Fenton Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. 23 County Route 6, Suite A Phoenix, NY 13135 (315) 695-7228 Attn. Bernie Carr Alpha Geoscience 679 Plank Road Clifton Park, NY, 12065 (518) 348-6995 Attn. Steven M. Trader TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet Table of Contents Executive Summary Errata (changes made and/or additional information added to the DEIS made as a result of comments received and FEIS responses) 1.0 Narrative Summary of Changes and Additional Information 2.0 Revised Information 2.1 Project Master Plan, L1.01 2.2 Project Master Plan with Constraints, L1.01A 2.3 Project Master Plan with Constraints Enlargements, L10.01-L10.09 2.4 Lot Study Plans, L9.01-L9.03 2.5 Figure 1.01B DEIS Master Plan Modifications 2.6 Lot Summary Table 2.7 Letter Report – Stormwater Management Design 2.8 Letter Report – Water Supply 2.9 Letter Report – Wastewater Collection and Disposal 2.10 Letter Report – Traffic Impact Assessment 2.11 Letter Report - Socioeconomics Assessment 2.12 Revised ARB Guidelines 2.13 Surveyor Stamped Watercourse Maps with NYCDEP Acceptance Letter 2.14 Table - Micropool Extended Detention Ponds Summary Table on Sheet L- 8.02 2.15 Revised Blasting Mitigation Measures 2.16 Alternative Access Analysis, March 2010 2.17 HydroCAD Links for Residential Units (on CD) 2.18 Modified Stormwater Management Design Report 2.19 Table – Comparison of Pre and Post Rates and Volumes for Type 2 and Custom Local Synthetic Rainfall 2.20 HydroCAD Data Files Using Synthetic Rainfall and Adjusted Tc and Cn Values (on CD) 2.21 Alpha Geoscience Hydrogeological Evaluation 2.22 Erosion and Sediment Control Design for Single Family Home Lots, L9.04 2.23 Table – Impervious Area/RRv Summary 2.24 Updated TP and TSS Loading Estimates 2.25 Figure -Floristic Survey Route 2.26 Figure - Isolated Wetlands 2.27 Figure – Isolated Wetlands Disturbance 2.28 Figure - Wetland Delineation Data Point Locations Page Responses to Comments 1.0 Purpose, Need, Benefits, Required Approvals (DEIS Section 1) .................................... 1 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action (DEIS Section 2 and Appendices 17 and 18) ................................................................................................ 6 3.0 Environmental Setting, Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures (DEIS Section 3) .......................................................................... 18 3.1 Geologic and Topographic Resources, Surface Water Resources, Groundwater Resources, Soils (DEIS Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.5 and Appendices 3, 4, 9 and 15) ........................................ 18 3.2 Water System General Comments .................................................................... 91 3.3 Water System Drawings .................................................................................... 94 3.4 Wastewater System General Comments ........................................................... 96 3.5 Wastewater Drawing Comments..................................................................... 104 3.6 Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology, Flora, Fauna, and Wetlands (DEIS Section 3.4 and Appendices 10 and 16) 3.7 Traffic and Transportation (DEIS Section 3.6 and Appendix 13) ................. 115 3.8 Visual Resources (DEIS Section 3.7 and Appendix 11) ................................ 118 3.9 Sound Resources (DEIS Section 3.8).............................................................. 124 3.10 Land Use and Community Character (DEIS Section 3.9) 3.11 Community Services (DEIS Section 3.10) ..................................................... 126 3.12 Socioeconomics (DEIS Section 3.11 and Appendix 14) ............................... 127 3.13 Cultural Resources (DEIS Section 3.12 and Appendix 12) ........................... 130 4.0 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts (DEIS Section 4) ............................... 131 5.0 Alternatives (DEIS Section 5) ...................................................................................... 132 6.0 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources (DEIS Section 6) .............. 134 7.0 Growth Inducing, Secondary and Cumulative Impacts (DEIS Section 7) ................. 134 8.0 Effect of the Proposed Action on the Use and Conservation of Energy (DEIS Section 8) .............................................................................................. 135 9.0 Consultation and Coordination (DEIS Section 9) ....................................................... 136 Appendix 1 Comments Received During the Public Comment Period Appendix 2 Summary of Public Comments Made During the Public Hearing Prepared by Delaware Engineering. Appendix 3 Comments Received After the Close of the Public Comment Period EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background and Document Organization This is a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) issued by the Town of Windham Planning Board, the Lead Agency, in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) also known as the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and implementing regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617). The proposed action that is the subject of this FEIS is the construction and operation of a residential sporting club known as the Windham Mountain Sporting Club in the Town of Windham, Greene County, New York. This FEIS consists of two parts. The first part of this document is the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and accompanying appendices and drawings/plans that were accepted as complete by the Windham Planning Board as Lead Agency on March 1, 2012. This FEIS incorporates the DEIS by reference. The second part is this FEIS document that addresses the issues raised during the DEIS public comment period as well as comment letters submitted to the Lead Agency after the close of the public comment period. Together the DEIS and FEIS constitute the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The SEQRA process is structured to allow examination of all relevant environmental issues by technical experts, agencies, and the public in order that the lead agency and other involved agencies may make reasoned and informed decisions. This FEIS has been prepared by the Lead Agency, with assistance from the Lead Agency’s technical consultants, the Applicant, and their consultants in order to carefully analyze comments and take a hard look at potential environmental impacts and proposed measures to mitigate such impacts. The FEIS provides additional information regarding existing environmental conditions, potential environmental impacts, and measures proposed to mitigate the potential impacts that were identified. The following section of this document, Errata, presents summaries of some of the topics for which revised information is provided in the FEIS, including: 1. Steep Slope Disturbance and Sediment and Erosion Control 2. Stormwater Management 3. Hydrogeology 4. Blasting/Noise 5. ARB Guidelines 6. Visual Impact Assessment 7. Recreation Demands 8. Water and Sewer 9. Traffic 10. Socioeconomics Windham Mountain Sporting Club FEIS Executive Summary i The Errata section also includes revised technical reports, revised project plans and revised EIS figures and tables. Following the Errata section of this FEIS are responses to the comments received during the public comment period that was open from March 2, 2012 to April 30, 2012 which also included a public hearing held at Windham Town Hall on April 5, 2012. Subsections of the Responses to Comments section of this FEIS follow the sequence and content of sections in the DEIS. Information is provided in a comment and response format. Copies of the comments submitted during the public comment period and made during the public hearing are included in Appendix 1 of this FEIS. Written comments were received from the following: • Delaware Engineering on behalf of the Windham Planning Board, April 30, 2012 • Supervisor Walker, Town of Windham, April 30, 2012 • NYSDEC Region 4, April 30, 2012 • NYCDEP, April 30, 2012 • Riverkeeper, April 30, 2012 A copy of meeting notes prepared by Delaware Engineering reporting on the content of the public comments made during the public hearing is included in Appendix 2 of this FEIS. The following people provided comments during the April 5, 2012 public hearing. • Rey Olsen, Windmont • Tim Woods, Windham Mountain Partners • Alan Higgins • Joe Damrath,