DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural and Anthropogenic Mercury Sources and Their Impact on the Air-Surface Exchange of Mercury on Regional and Global Scales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural and Anthropogenic Mercury Sources and Their Impact on the Air-Surface Exchange of Mercury on Regional and Global Scales GKSS Natural and Anthropogenic Mercury Sources and Their Impact on the Air-Surface Exchange of Mercury on Regional and Global Scales Authors: R. Ebinghaus R. M. Tripathi D. Wallschlager S. E. Lindberg DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. KS002458351 R: KS DE012844914 *05012844914* Natural and Anthropogenic Mercury Sources and Their Impact on the Air-Surface Exchange of Mercury on Regional and Global Scales R. Ebingiiaus , R.M. T ripathi , D. Wali .sciii.ager , and S.E. L indberg 1 Introduction Mercury is outstanding among the global environmental pollutants of continuing concern. Especially in the last decade of the 20th century, environmental scientists, legislators, politicians and the public have become aware of mercury pollution in the global environment. It has often been suggested that anthro­ pogenic emissions are leading to a general increase in mercury on local, regional, and global scales (Lindqvist et al. 1991; Expert Panel 1994). Mercury is emitted into the atmosphere from a number of natural as well as anthropogenic sources. In contrast with most of the other heavy metals, mercury and manyof its compounds behave exceptionally in the environment due to their volatility and capability for methylation. Long-range atmospheric transport of mercury, its transformation to more toxic methylmercury compounds, and their bioaccumulation in the aquatic foodchain have motivated intensive research on mercury as a pollutant of global concern. Mercury takes part in a number of complex environmental cycles, and special interest is focused on the aquatic-biological and the atmospheric cycles. Environmental cycling of mercurycan be described as a series of processes where chemical and physical transformations are the governing factors for the distribution of mercury in and between different compartments of the environment. Mercury can exist in a large number of different physical and chemical forms with a wide range of physical, chemical, and ecotoxicological properties and consequently with fundamental importance for the environmental behavior. The three most important chemical forms known to occur in the environment are: elemental mercury [Hg(o)], which has a high vapor pressure and a relatively low solubility in water; divalent inorganic mercury (Hg2+), which can be far more soluble and has a strong affinity for many inorganic and organic ligands, especially those containing sulphur; and methylmercury (CH3Hg+), which is strongly accumulated by living organisms. Conversions between these different forms provide the basis of mercury’s complex distribution pattern on local, regional, and global scales. This chapter was prepared while R.M.T. and S.E.L. were visiting scientists at the Institute of Physical and Chemical Analysis at GKSS Research Centre, Geesthacht, Germany. Publication number 4745, Environ. Sci. Div. Oak Ridge National Lab. Environmental Science Mercury Contaminated Sites (ed. by R. Ebinghaus el al.) <0 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999 4 R. Ebinghaus et al. Extensive information exists on environmental and health effects of mercury and its behavior in the environment (e.g., Wheatley and Wyzga 1997). Much less information is available on the fluxes of the element and its compounds to the air, water, and soils. This chapter summarizes present knowledge on natural and anthropogenic mercury fluxes to the atmosphere from various sources and their relative importance on regional and global scales. 2 The Atmospheric Mercury Cycle The atmospheric cycle of mercury is determined by natural and anthropogenic emissions, a complex atmospheric chemistry, and wet and dry deposition processes. Atmospheric chemistry and especially the deposition of mercury are strongly linked to the speciation of mercury released into the atmosphere by different types of sources. The linkage between the atmospheric and biological cycles is manifested in the deposition of atmospheric mercury species. Schroeder and Lane (1988) illus­ trated (Fig. 1) the most important processes in the emission and deposition cycle of atmospheric mercury. The deposition pathway is dominated by the flux of emitted Hg(II) compounds (formal reactive gaseous mercury or RGM), the oxidation of elemental mercury vapor to Hg(II), and subsequent wet and/or dry deposition. Mercury species attached to particles can be removed from the atmosphere by precipitation or dry deposition (Expert Panel 1994), but these fluxes are generally less important. Once deposited, the formation of volatile gaseous mercury, especially the formation of highly toxic methylmercury, its enrichment in organisms and nutritional chains, and finally destruction (demethylation) of methylmercury are the main features of the biological cycle of mercury. 2.1 Speciation of Emissions On a global scale, the atmospheric mercury cycle is dominated by elemental mercury vapor (generally > 95% of total airborne Hg). However, the emission speciation of mercury is determined by the source characteristics and conse­ quently shows large regional variability. To characterize the main emission pathways, the Expert Panel on Mercury Atmospheric Processes (1994) defined three different terms for mercury emissions: 1. Anthropogenic mercury emissions: the mobilization or release of geologically bound mercury by man’s activities, with mass transfer of mercury to the atmosphere. Natural and Anthropogenic Mercury Sources 5 Dry Transformations Air Wet Concentrations Transformations Transport and Scavenging Diffusion Total Emissions Scavenging Dry Wet Anthropogenic Natural Re-emission Deposition Deposition \ Adapted from Schroeder, W.H. and Lane, DA, 1988. Fig. 1. Mercury emissions-to-deposition cycle, (After Schroeder and Lane 1988) 2. Natural mercury emissions: the mobilization or release of geologically bound mercury by natural biotic and abiotic processes, with mass transfer of mercury to the atmosphere. 3. Reemission of mercury: the mass transfer of mercury to the atmosphere by biotic or abiotic processes drawing on a pool of mercury that was deposited to the Earth’s surface after initial mobilization by either anthropogenic or natural activities. Together, these last two pathways are also designated mercury emissions from natural surfaces, and they represent large uncontrolled area source emissions which must be taken into account by global models. Speciation of atmospheric mercury originated from these source types is discussed in the following sections. 2.1.1 Anthropogenic Mercury Emission Speciation Fuel combustion, waste incineration, industrial processes, and metal ore roasting, refining, and processing are the most important point source categories for anthropogenic mercury emissions into the atmosphere on a worldwide basis. Besides elemental mercury an important and variable fraction can be emitted as reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) or particulate Hg(II) (Expert Panel 1994). For Europe, Pacyna (1993) estimated the anthropogenic mercury emissions for the above mentioned species summarized in Table 1. It is evident from the table that 6 R. Ebinghaus et al. the major species is Hg(o). The relative distribution between elemental mercury vapor and gaseous or particulate Hg(II) varies from country to country, however. The major portion of mercury emissions from combustion of fuels is in the gaseous phase. In the combustion zone, mercury present in coal or other fossil fuels evaporates in elemental form and then most likely a portion of it is oxidized in the flue gases (Prestbo et al. 1995). Emitted mercury species into the environment depend upon the nature of the source of emission. Mercury emitted from high temperature processes such as coal combustion and pyrite roasters will probably be converted to the elemental form, Hg(o). However, in flue gases, where the temperature drops, Hg(o) may be oxidized by HC1 and 02 in presence of soot or other surfaces (Hall et al. 1991; Prestbo et al. 1995). In modern combustion plants equipped with flue gas cleaning facilities such as wet scrubbers, the oxidized and particulate forms should be removed easily. Hence, the primary emission will be Hg(o). Table 2 summarizes the speciation of mercury emissions from flue gases and other industrial«emissions. 2.1.2 Speciation of Natural Mercury Emission and Re-Emission The mercury that evades from natural sources is generally entirely in the elemental form (S.E. Lindberg et al. 1979, 1995, 1998). Natural sources are, for example, the evasion from surface waters, from soils, from minerals, and from vegetation located in terrestrial and wetland systems. Volcanism, erosion, and exhalation from natural geothermal and other geological crevices also mainly emit elemental mercury. Global volcanic emissions were estimated from the Hg/S ratio and account for approximately 20 to 90 t year-1, which is about 1-5% of the annual emissions from human activities (Fitzgerald 1996). Generally speaking, the distinction between natural and “quasinatural reemissions” of mercury (that which was formerly deposited from the Table 1. Anthropogenic Emission (t year ') of mercury and its species in Europe. (After Pacyna 1993) Country 1lg(o) gas Hg(ll) (gas) Hg (particles) Hg (total) Belgium 5.3 2.2 1.4 8.9 Czechoslovakia 7.8 4.5 2.7 15.0 Denmark 2.1 1.9 0.8 4.8 Finland 3.1 0.8 0.3 4.1 France 15.3 9.0 5.6 29.9 GDR 203.0 99.0 28.0 330.0 FR Germany 38.0 20.0 7.0 65.0 Netherlands 3.0 3.8 1.4 8.2 Norway 1.4 0.4 0.2 2.0 Poland 23.3 13.1 8.3 44.7 Sweden 5.6 1.4 0.5 7.5 Soviet Union 45.0 25.7 17.0 87.7 United Kingdom 21.0 14.0 5.0 40.0 Natural and Anthropogenic Mercury Sources 7 Table 2. Speciation of mercury in flue gases and other industrial emissions. (After Munthe 1993) Process % Hg(o) % Hg(II) (g) % Hg(I!)(s) Reference Chlorine alkali 50-90 10-50 Leavander (1987) Coal combustion 50 30 20 Brosset (1983) Bergstrom (1983) Roasting of sulphide ores 80-90 10-20 Leavander (1987) Pyrite burning 100 Leavander (1987) Waste incineration 20 60 20 Bergstrom (1986) Vogg et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HISTORY of LEAD POISONING in the WORLD Dr. Herbert L. Needleman Introduction the Center for Disease Control Classified the Cause
    HISTORY OF LEAD POISONING IN THE WORLD Dr. Herbert L. Needleman Introduction The Center for Disease Control classified the causes of disease and death as follows: 50 % due to unhealthy life styles 25 % due to environment 25% due to innate biology and 25% due to inadequate health care. Lead poisoning is an environmental disease, but it is also a disease of life style. Lead is one of the best-studied toxic substances, and as a result we know more about the adverse health effects of lead than virtually any other chemical. The health problems caused by lead have been well documented over a wide range of exposures on every continent. The advancements in technology have made it possible to research lead exposure down to very low levels approaching the limits of detection. We clearly know how it gets into the body and the harm it causes once it is ingested, and most importantly, how to prevent it! Using advanced technology, we can trace the evolution of lead into our environment and discover the health damage resulting from its exposure. Early History Lead is a normal constituent of the earth’s crust, with trace amounts found naturally in soil, plants, and water. If left undisturbed, lead is practically immobile. However, once mined and transformed into man-made products, which are dispersed throughout the environment, lead becomes highly toxic. Solely as a result of man’s actions, lead has become the most widely scattered toxic metal in the world. Unfortunately for people, lead has a long environmental persistence and never looses its toxic potential, if ingested.
    [Show full text]
  • ESTIMATION of FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE in URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS by Wuzter A
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-4823 - - .- j (2. -1 "-0 -5 M 0-- N t+=$j oo w- P LOAN COPY: RET rm 3 d z c 4 c/) 4 z ESTIMATION OF FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE IN URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS by WuZter A. PuuZson una Roy H. Springborn Lewis Reseurcb Center Clevelund, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER 1968 i 1 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM I 111111 lllll IllH llll lilll1111111111111 Ill1 01317Lb NASA TN D-4823 ESTIMATION OF FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE IN URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS By Walter A. Paulson and Roy H. Springborn Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTl price $3.00 ABSTRACl Fission-product gas pressure in macroscopic voids was calculated over the tempera- ture range of 1000 to 2500 K for clad uranium dioxide fuel elements operating in a fast neutron spectrum. The calculated fission-product yields for uranium-233 and uranium- 235 used in the pressure calculations were based on experimental data compiled from various sources. The contributions of cesium, rubidium, and other condensible fission products are included with those of the gases xenon and krypton. At low temperatures, xenon and krypton are the major contributors to the total pressure. At high tempera- tures, however, cesium and rubidium can make a considerable contribution to the total pressure. ii ESTIMATION OF FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE IN URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS by Walter A. Paulson and Roy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Components of the Microbial Mercury Methylation Pathway
    Protein Components of the Microbial Mercury Methylation Pathway ______________________________________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri - Columbia ____________________________________________________ In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________ by Steven D. Smith Dr. Judy D. Wall, Dissertation Supervisor December 2015 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation titled Protein Components of the Microbial Mercury Methylation Pathway Presented by Steven D. Smith, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ____________________________________________ Dr. Judy D. Wall ____________________________________________ Dr. David W. Emerich ____________________________________________ Dr. Thomas P. Quinn ____________________________________________ Dr. Michael J. Calcutt Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my parents and family for their constant support and patience. They have never failed to be there for me. I would like to thank all members of the Wall Lab. At one time or another each one of them has helped me in some way. In particular I would like to thank Barb Giles for her insight into the dynamics of the lab and for her support of me through these years. I am greatly appreciative to Dr. Judy Wall for the opportunity to earn my PhD in her lab. Her constant support and unending confidence in me has been a great source of motivation. It has been an incredible learning experience that I will carry with me and draw from for the rest of my life. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Education
    MERCURY The Slippery, Silent Toxin to Dispose of Carefully You may be surprised to find mercury in your home, business and places you go often. When spilled or not disposed of carefully, it poses a risk to human and ecosystem health. DID YOU KNOW? Mercury is the only metal that is liquid at room Why is Mercury Such a Problem? temperature. Mercury, or quicksilver, is an element that serves many useful 80 purposes – when contained. It conducts electricity, is used in thermometers, thermostats, barometers, blood pressure cuffs and many other everyday items such as some alarm clocks Mercury 200.59 and irons. The most common use is in today’s fluorescent light bulbs that use mercury vapor. Read the reverse The trouble comes when mercury is not disposed of properly for safe ways to or worse, when it spills. Mercury is a toxic element that can dispose of mercury. enter the body through an open wound or by inhaling or ingesting it. It can cause damage to nerves, the liver and kidneys, as well as a number of other symptoms. If mercury is poured down the drain or dumped into the sewer, it seeps into lakes and waterways, a chemical process occurs, converting it to deadly methylmercury, potentially contaminating the fish and animals we eat. When products containing mercury are placed in the trash or poured down the drain, the mercury does not disappear. It ends up in the environment via landfills and wastewater treatment facilities. Now that you know some of the items that contain mercury, you can make Never touch or vacuum up buying decisions that reduce the amount of mercury in your home or office, spilled mercury in any form, and that assure safe disposal of products that contain mercury.
    [Show full text]
  • Emea Public Statement on Thiomersal in Vaccines for Human Use – Recent Evidence Supports Safety of Thiomersal-Containing Vaccines
    The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Pre-authorisation evaluation of medicines for human use London, 24 March 2004 Doc. Ref: EMEA/CPMP/VEG/1194/04/Adopted EMEA PUBLIC STATEMENT ON THIOMERSAL IN VACCINES FOR HUMAN USE – RECENT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS SAFETY OF THIOMERSAL-CONTAINING VACCINES The EMEA issued statements on the use of thiomersal in vaccines in 1999 and 2000 (EMEA/20962/99, EMEA/CPMP/1578/00). In light of recent reassuring data on the safety of thiomersal-containing vaccines, this new statement updates previous recommendations. Thiomersal, is an antimicrobial organic mercury compound that continues to be used either in the early stages of manufacturing, or as a preservative, in some vaccines. The antimicrobial action of thiomersal relates to ethylmercury, which is released after breakdown of thiomersal into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) previously advised that although there was no evidence of harm from thiomersal in vaccines other than hypersensitivity (allergic) reactions, it would be prudent to promote the general use of vaccines without thiomersal and other mercury containing preservatives, particularly for single dose vaccines. Since then, several vaccines licensed in the European Union have had thiomersal removed or levels reduced and new vaccines without thiomersal have been licensed. CPMP advice was in line with the global goal of reducing environmental exposure to mercury. The previous assessment of risks associated with ethylmercury had been based on data on methylmercury, as the toxicity profile of the two compounds was assumed to be similar. In March 2004, the CPMP reviewed the latest evidence relating to the safety of thiomersal-containing vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Spill Fact Sheet
    This fact sheet is intended to be a quick reference tool for people who are involved in a mercury spill and cleanup event. MERCURY Mercury mercury MERCURY MERCURY MERCURY Elemental mercury, also called “quicksilver,” is a heavy, silvery, form of the metal mercury that is liquid at room temperature. It can slowly change from a liquid into a gas that is invisible to the naked eye. The gas or “vapors” that are released will start to fill a room if mercury is spilled indoors. MERCURY EXPOSURE Mercury is a very toxic or poisonous substance that people can be exposed to in several ways. If it is swallowed, like from a broken thermometer, it mostly passes through your body and very little is absorbed. If you touch it, a small amount may pass through your skin, but not usually enough to harm you. Mercury is most harmful when you breathe in the vapors that are released when a container is open or a spill occurs. HEALTH EFFECTS Pregnant women, infants and young children are particularly sensitive to the harmful effects of mercury. The health effects that can result from mercury exposure depend on how much mercury you are exposed to and how long you are exposed. Some of the acute effects, ones that may come soon after exposure to high concentrations of mercury are: • Headaches, chills, fever • chest tightness, coughs • hand tremors • nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea Some effects that may result from chronic, or longer term exposure to mercury vapor can be: • Personality changes • Decreased vision or hearing • Peripheral nerve damage • Elevated blood pressure Children are especially sensitive to mercury and at risk of developing a condition known as acrodynia or “Pinks Disease” by breathing vapors or other exposure circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVISIONAL PEER REVIEWED TOXICITY VALUES for DIMETHYLMERCURY (CASRN 593-74-8) Derivation of Subchronic and Chronic Oral Rfds
    EPA/690/R-04/005F l Final 12-01-2004 Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Dimethylmercury (CASRN 593-74-8) Derivation of Subchronic and Chronic Oral RfDs Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 Acronyms and Abbreviations bw body weight cc cubic centimeters CD Caesarean Delivered CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 CNS central nervous system cu.m cubic meter DWEL Drinking Water Equivalent Level FEL frank-effect level FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act g grams GI gastrointestinal HEC human equivalent concentration Hgb hemoglobin i.m. intramuscular i.p. intraperitoneal i.v. intravenous IRIS Integrated Risk Information System IUR inhalation unit risk kg kilogram L liter LEL lowest-effect level LOAEL lowest-observed-adverse-effect level LOAEL(ADJ) LOAEL adjusted to continuous exposure duration LOAEL(HEC) LOAEL adjusted for dosimetric differences across species to a human m meter MCL maximum contaminant level MCLG maximum contaminant level goal MF modifying factor mg milligram mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/L milligrams per liter MRL minimal risk level i MTD maximum tolerated dose MTL median threshold limit NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NOAEL no-observed-adverse-effect level NOAEL(ADJ) NOAEL adjusted to continuous exposure duration NOAEL(HEC) NOAEL adjusted for dosimetric differences across species to a
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury in Fish – Background to the Mercury in Fish Advisory Statement
    Mercury in fish – Background to the mercury in fish advisory statement (March 2004) Food regulators regularly assess the potential risks associated with the presence of contaminants in the food supply to ensure that, for all sections of the population, these risks are minimised. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) has recently reviewed its risk assessment for mercury in food. The results from this assessment indicate that certain groups, particularly pregnant women, women intending to become pregnant and young children (up to and including 6 years), should limit their consumption of some types of fish in order to control their exposure to mercury. The risk assessment conducted by FSANZ that was published in 2004 used the most recent data and knowledge available at the time. FSANZ intends toreview the advisory statement in the future and will take any new data and scientific evidence into consideration at that time. BENEFITS OF FISH Even though certain types of fish can accumulate higher levels of mercury than others, it is widely recognised that there are considerable nutritional benefits to be derived from the regular consumption of fish. Fish is an excellent source of high biological value protein, is low in saturated fat and contains polyunsaturated fatty acids such as essential omega-3 polyunsaturates. It is also a good source of some vitamins, particularly vitamin D where a 150 g serve of fish will supply around 3 micrograms of vitamin D – about three times the amount of vitamin D in a 10 g serve of margarine. Fish forms a significant component of the Australian diet with approximately 25% of the population consuming fish at least once a week (1995 Australian National Nutrition Survey; McLennan & Podger 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Elemental Mercury Emission in the Indoor Environment Due to Broken Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) Bulbs
    Elemental Mercury Emission In The Indoor Environment Due To Broken Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) Bulbs David Marr1, Mark Mason1, Stanley Durkee2 1U.S. EPA, RTP, NC 2U.S. EPA, Washington DC Mark Mason l [email protected] l 919-541-4835 Paper control number 553 Introduction Mercury emissions from broken Broken CFL Bulb Cleanup fluorescent bulbs Compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs require elemental The U.S EPA, as part of its public outreach program, provides mercury for operation. Each bulb contains a few milligrams Published research on mercury emissions cleanup guidance when a CFL is broken in the indoor of mercury, a value that has been decreasing over time due to environment. As part of this guidance, it is recommended that new technologies and methodologies, driven primarily by from lighting the debris be cleaned up following 5 to 10 minutes of increased environmental and consumer concerns. If a CFL breaks, Aucott et al. (2003) generated mercury emission rate ventilation and some initial steps. Figure 3 shows indoor model some of the mercury is immediately released as elemental equations for fluorescent lamps (FLs) broken in a barrel at results that include the emission rate of Equation 1, but with mercury vapor while the remainder is available for emission three ambient air temperatures in an effort to quantify source removal occurring at 15 minutes to provide a visual of over time to air via the bulb debris and contaminated indoor mercury emissions in time. Equation 1 is their published the impact of proper cleanup on indoor mercury concentrations surfaces until properly remediated.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Use and Loss from Gold Mining in Nineteenth-Century Victoria 45
    CSIRO Publishing The Royal Society of Victoria, 127, 44 –54, 2015 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/rs 10.1071/RS15017 Me RCuRy uSe and LOSS fROM GOLd MInInG In nIneTeenTh- CenTuRy Victoria Peter Davies1, susan Lawrence2 anD JoDi turnbuLL3 1, 2, 3 department of archaeology and history, La Trobe university, Bundoora, Victoria 3086 Correspondence: Peter davies, [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper reports on preliminary research into gold-mining-related mercury contamination in nineteenth-century Victoria. data drawn from contemporary sources, including Mineral Statistics of Victoria and Mining Surveyors Reports from 1868‒1888, are used to calculate quantities of mercury used by miners to amalgamate gold in stamp batteries and the rates of mercury lost in the process. Some of the mercury discharged from mining and ore milling flowed into nearby waterways and some remained in the waste residue, the tailings near the mills. We estimate that a minimum of 121 tons of mercury were discharged from stamp batteries in this period. although the figures fluctuate through time and space, they allow a good estimate of how much mercury was leaving the mine workings and entering Victorian creeks and rivers. Better understanding of historic mercury loss can provide the basis for improved mapping of mercury distribution in modern waterways, which can in turn inform the management of catchment systems. Keywords: mercury, gold mining, pollution, water, rivers In recent years, mercury in waterways has emerged as an et al. 1996) and new Zealand (Moreno et al. 2005), while important environmental issue in south-eastern australia extensive mercury pollution also resulted from silver and in many other areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury and Mercury Compounds
    United States Office of Air Quality EPA-454/R-97-012 Environmental Protection Planning And Standards Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 December 1997 AIR EPA LOCATING AND ESTIMATING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SOURCES OF MERCURY AND MERCURY COMPOUNDS L & E EPA-454/R-97-012 Locating And Estimating Air Emissions From Sources of Mercury and Mercury Compounds Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 December 1997 This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. EPA-454/R-97-012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ xi 1.0 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT .............................................. 1-1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENT CONTENTS ................................. 2-1 3.0 BACKGROUND ........................................................ 3-1 3.1 NATURE OF THE POLLUTANT ..................................... 3-1 3.2 OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTION, USE, AND EMISSIONS ................. 3-1 3.2.1 Production .................................................. 3-1 3.2.2 End-Use .................................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Emissions ................................................... 3-6 4.0 EMISSIONS FROM MERCURY PRODUCTION ............................. 4-1 4.1 PRIMARY MERCURY
    [Show full text]
  • Inorganic Mercury, Methyl Mercury, Ethyl Mercury
    Laboratory Procedure Manual Analyte: Inorganic mercury, Methyl mercury, Ethyl mercury Matrix: Blood Method: Blood mercury speciation TSID-GC-ICP-DRC-MS (Triple Spike Isotope Dilution Gas Chromatography- Inductively Coupled Plasma Dynamic Reaction Cell Mass Spectrometry) Method No: DLS-3020.5 Adopted: Revised: As performed by: Inorganic and Radiation Analytical Toxicology Branch Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Contact: Dr. Robert L. Jones Phone: 770-488-7991 Fax: 770-488-4097 Email: [email protected] James L. Pirkle, M.D., Ph.D. Director, Division of Laboratory Sciences Important Information for Users CDC periodically refines these laboratory methods. It is the responsibility of the user to contact the person listed on the title page of each write-up before using the analytical method to find out whether any changes have been made and what revisions, if any, have been incorporated. Mercury speciation in whole blood NHANES 2011-2012 Page 2 of 52 This document details the Lab Protocol for testing items in the following table: Data File Name Variable Name SAS Label LBXIHG Mercury, inorganic (µg/L) LBDIHGSI Mercury, inorganic (µmol/L) IHgEM_G LBXBGE Mercury, ethyl (µg/dL) LBXBGM Mercury, methyl (μg/L) Mercury speciation in whole blood NHANES 2011-2012 Page 3 of 52 1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE AND TEST PRINCIPLE A. Clinical Relevance Mercury (Hg) is widespread in the environment and found in its elemental form (Hg0), inorganic forms such as mercurous (Hg+) and mercuric (Hg2+), and various organic forms such as methyl mercury (MeHg), ethyl mercury (EtHg), phenyl mercury (PhHg), and others. The health effects of mercury are diverse and depend on the form of mercury encountered and the severity and length of 0 2+ + exposure.
    [Show full text]