Fisher's Folly & Edward De Vere
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Post Office London Pub
1822 PUB POST OFFICE LONDON PUB PUBLICANS-continued. Lord Napier, Frederick Rix, 27 London fields, Mansion House, Percy IIamilton Gardner, 204 Metropolitan Tavern,Da.niel William Vousden-, Laurie Arms,Robert Tuck,1 Should ham street, Hackney NE Evelyn street, Deptford SE 95 Farringdon road E C &; Bryanston square W 32 Crawford place, - George IIenryStribling, 118 Great Church - John Mather Presley, 46 & 48 Kennington Tavern, Waiter Orchard1 79 West Edgware road W lane, llammersmith W park road S E bourne road N Leather Exchange Tavern, Mrs.Alois Pfeiffer, Lord Nelson, Mrs. Anne Elizabeth Da.vey, 1 Marion Arms, George Robert Jackson, 46 Middleton Arms, Frederick Longhurst, 14 Leather market, Bermondsey SE Manchester road, Poplar E Lansdowne road, Dalston NE Mansfield street, Kingsland road N E Lee Arms, Thomas William Savage, 27 Marl - William Hunter Gillingham, 17 Nelson Market House, Glaze Bros. Ltd. 9 Russell - William Joseph Young, 123 Queen's rood, borough road, Dalston N E street, City road E G street, Covent garden WC Dalston NE Leicester (The),Best's Brewery Co. Ltd.1 New - Charles Mackie Hurt, 18 Upper Charlton Market House Tavern, Ernest Hellard, Col Mildmay Park Tavern, James Palmer, 130 0oYPntry street W street, Fitzroy ~quare W umbia market, Columbia road E Ball's Pond road N Leigh Hoy, Jsph. Perkoff, 163 Hanbury st E - James Edwd. Marley, 386 Old Kent rd SE - Siduey Geo.Skepelhorn, 7 Finsbury mkt E C Milford Haven, John Wakely, 214 Cale Leighton Arms, Mrs. Ada Arnsby, 101 Breck - Albert Joseph Milton, 137 Trafalgar street, Market tavern, Ernest Percival Gladwin, 65 donian road N nock road N Walworth SE Brushfield street E Millwall Dock Hotel, Mrs. -
2. the Statement of Significance Discloses That Reference Was First
IN THE CONSISTORY COURT OF THE DIOCESE OF LONDON RE: ST STEPHEN W ALBROOK Faculty Petition dated 1 May 2012 Faculty Ref: 2098 Proposed Disposal by sale of Benjamin West painting, 'Devout Men Taking the Body of St Stephen' JUDGMENT 1. By a petition dated 1 May 2012 the Priest-in-Charge and churchwardens of St Stephen Walbrook and St Swithin London Stone with St Benet Sherehog and St Mary Bothaw with St Lawrence Pountney seek a faculty to authorise: "the disposal by sale of a painting by Benjamin West depicting 'Devout Men taking the body ofSt Stephen'". The proposal has the unanimous support of the Parochial Church Council but it is not recommended by the Diocesan Advisory Committee. General citation took place between 15 March and 18 Apri12012 and no objections were received from parishioners or members of the public. No objections were received from English Heritage or the Local Planning Authority (who were both notified of the proposal). The Ancient Monument Society, although consulted and invited to attend the directions and subsequent hearings, indicated that it did not wish to be involved. Initially, the Church Buildings Council (CBC), having advised against the proposals and agreeing with the views of the DAC, stated that it would not wish formally to oppose the petition but it subsequently changed its mind and was given leave by me to become a Party Opponent out of time. The Georgian Group objected from the outset and, having initially indicated it wished to be a Party Opponent, subsequently agreed to its interests being represented at the hearing by the CBC. -
Redating Pericles: a Re-Examination of Shakespeare’S
REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY A THESIS IN Theatre Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by Michelle Elaine Stelting University of Missouri Kansas City December 2015 © 2015 MICHELLE ELAINE STELTING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY Michelle Elaine Stelting, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT Pericles's apparent inferiority to Shakespeare’s mature works raises many questions for scholars. Was Shakespeare collaborating with an inferior playwright or playwrights? Did he allow so many corrupt printed versions of his works after 1604 out of indifference? Re-dating Pericles from the Jacobean to the Elizabethan era answers these questions and reveals previously unexamined connections between topical references in Pericles and events and personalities in the court of Elizabeth I: John Dee, Philip Sidney, Edward de Vere, and many others. The tournament impresas, alchemical symbolism of the story, and its lunar and astronomical imagery suggest Pericles was written long before 1608. Finally, Shakespeare’s focus on father-daughter relationships, and the importance of Marina, the daughter, as the heroine of the story, point to Pericles as written for a young girl. This thesis uses topical references, Shakespeare’s anachronisms, Shakespeare’s sources, stylometry and textual analysis, as well as Henslowe’s diary, the Stationers' Register, and other contemporary documentary evidence to determine whether there may have been versions of Pericles circulating before the accepted date of 1608. -
More Recent Publications in Oxfordian Studies the Secret Love Story in Shakespeare's Sonnets, by Helen Heightsman
More Recent Publications in Oxfordian Studies Helen Heightsman Gordon. The Secret Love Story in Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Xlibris Corp., 2005. 158p. Oxford’s Letters: The Letters of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. CD set. Read by Derek Jacobi. Narr. Joan Walker. London: Absolute Audio, 2006. AA003. William Farina. De Vere as Shakespeare: An Oxfordian Reading of the Canon. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., Inc., 2006. 271p. Michael Delahoyde Washington State University In the previous issue of the Rocky Mountain Review, I discussed three key recent works emerging from the fast-growing conviction that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, wrote what became the “Shake-speare” canon: the collection of articles published as Great Oxford (2004); Mark Anderson’s biographical “Shakespeare” By Another Name (2005); and Hank Whittemore’s colossus on Shakespeare’s sonnets, The Monument (2005). Here, a look at three more publications brings us up to date in this obviously active area of Oxfordian studies. Helen Heightsman Gordon has decades of professional experience in teaching, editing, publishing, and educational administration. She has published five textbooks in addition to other books, journal articles, poetry, and a trademarked word game. I mention this because of the unusual circumstance that the book under scrutiny here is self-published. It should be taken as an excellent sign that I did not make this realization until I had read enough of the work to decide that I wanted to review (and, hence, somewhat publicize) this book. In The Secret Love Story in Shakespeare’s Sonnets, Gordon intelligently and humanely explicates well over five dozen of the poems, providing the sonnets themselves, thorough and straightforward paraphrases, and concise but never hasty discussions. -
Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert Yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertJune 20, 2014 yuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop asdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx MY SEARCH FOR THE ORIGINS OF cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnDEACON JOHN DONE mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwePresented to The Doane Family Association Research Committee rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio by pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf Maureen Scott Committee Member ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz 2014 xcvbnmqwertyuiop asdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyDuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert1 yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop June 20, 2014 Table of Contents Preamble:....................................................................................................pg. 3 Sections: 1 - The City of London and Its People..........................................................pg. 4 2 - City of London Pilgrims...........................................................................pg. .9 3 - PossiBle Links with Deacon John Done..................................................pg. 11 4 - Previous Lines of Inquiry........................................................................pg. 16 5 - Y-DNA Project.........................................................................................pg. 19 Summary / Recommendations:.................................................................pg. 20 References:................................................................................................pg. -
CITY of LONDON P69/SWI Page 1 Reference Description Dates
LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 SAINT SWITHIN, LONDON STONE: CITY OF LONDON P69/SWI Reference Description Dates PARISH REGISTERS P69/SWI/A/001/MS04311 Register of baptisms 1615-75, marriages 1619- 1614 - 1675 Not available for general access 65 and burials 1614-65. Please use microfilm For burials 1656 (Aug)- 1657 (Jul) see Ms available online via 4312. www.ancestry.co.uk 1 volume Former Reference: MS 04311 P69/SWI/A/002/MS04312 Register of baptisms 1675-1783, marriages 1656 - 1783 Not available for general access 1672-1754 and burials 1656-78 of the united Please use microfilm parishes of St Swithin London Stone with St available online via Mary Bothaw. www.ancestry.co.uk Burial entries 1656-65 are transcribed from Ms 4311; of the pages in Ms 4311 from which the transcript was made, those containing burials 1656 (Aug)- 1657 (Jul) are now missing. This transcript, and also the original burial registrations to ca.1670, are for St Swithin London Stone only; burials from ca. 1670 are joint with St Mary Bothaw. 1 volume Former Reference: MS 04312 P69/SWI/A/003/MS04553 Register of baptisms 1813-1944, marriages 1813 - 1944 Not available for general access 1813-37 and burials 1813-53. Please use microfilm Also contains an entry for a funeral in 1935 Part available online via 1 volume www.ancestry.co.uk Former Reference: MS 04553 P69/SWI/A/004/MS04313 Register of baptisms of St Swithin London 1784 - 1812 Not available for general access Stone and St Mary Bothaw. Please use microfilm Latter half blank. -
This Walk Has Been Commissioned by Artangel As Part of A
Urban Geology in London No. 29 This walk has been commissioned by Artangel as part of a programme of events surrounding artist Katrina Palmer’s project on the Isle of Portland and on BBC Radio 4, End Matter. This takes place in April-May 2015. The walk took place on 30th May 2015. London does not have a good local building stone. The Roman and Medieval city was built of Kentish Ragstone and Reigate Stone. Later, the abundant clays and brickearths of the local geology were exploited and stock brick became the city’s main building material. Bath Stone was brought in for some structures. However monumental buildings befitting of a capital required something special, and Portland Stone from Dorset became popular in the early 17th Century and remains London’s iconic stone to this day. There are thousands of buildings in London built of Portland Stone and many others in the maJor cities of the British Isles. One may consider St Paul’s Cathedral, the maJority of the buildings on Whitehall including the Cenotaph and the Banqueting House, The Royal Naval College at Greenwich, The Bank of England, The British Museum, The National Gallery and indeed my home institution, University College London. The stone has also been exported world-wide, mainly to commonwealth countries and the USA. Here we may count amongst several Portland Stone structures the United Nations Building (1952) in New York City. Auckland’s War Memorial Museum in New Zealand probably represents the use of this material most distant from the source. Portland Stone is also the standard for the Commonwealth war grave memorials. -
Q & a with Hank Whittemore
Fall 2012 Shakespeare Matters page 1 11:4 “Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments...” Fall 2012 Q & A with Hank Whittemore: The Southampton Controversy [Editor’s note: Probably the most controversial issue among Oxfordians is the “PT” theory – did Oxford and Queen Elizabeth have a child together? One of its most passionate advocates is Hank Whittemore, whose 2005 book, The Monument, and his 2010 book, Shakespeare’s Son and His Sonnets, explain his case SF trustee and longtme member Kathryn Sharpe in favor of the theory. The principal purpose of this Q & A is to and Dr. Don Rubin, York University Professor explore some collateral issues raised by the PT theory that, to us, Emeritus of Theatre History, share a comic mo- had not been fully explored.] ment at the Pasadena Conference. Shakespeare Matters: Do you think Oxford and the Queen knew that their son was being raised as the Third Earl of Southampton? Hank Whittemore: I’m not sure if Oxford would have known Huntington Library Tour a High until late 1581, after the eight-year-old Southampton had en- tered Cecil House in London. (If he had been born in May 1574, Point of the 8th Annual Joint of course, he would have turned eight in May 1582.) I think the Queen knew. For sure Burghley knew. I believe a deal had been Conference in Pasadena made between Oxford and Burghley: Oxford would return to his wife Anne Cecil, daughter of Burghley; in return, Southampton by Howard Schumann would be brought to London as a royal ward in Burghley’s cus- tody. -
Medievalism and Modernity
Studies in Medievalism Founded by Leslie J. Workman Medievalism and Modernity Recently published volumes are listed at the back of this book Edited by Karl Fugelso with Joshua Davies and Sarah Salih Studies in Medievalism XXV 2016 Cambridge D. S. Brewer © Smdies in Medievalism 2016 • All rights reserved. Except as permitted under current legislation Studies lll no pan of this work may be photocopied, stored in a retrieval system, published, performed in public, adapted, broadcast, transmitted, recorded or reproduced in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the copyright owner Medievalism Founding Editor Leslie J. Workman First published 2016 Editor Karl Fugelso D. S. Brewer, Cambridge Advisory Board Marrin Arnold (Hull) ISBN 978-1-84384-437-2 Geraldine Barnes (Sydney) Rolf H. Bremmer, Jr. (Leiden) ISSN 0738-7164 William Calin (Florida) A. E. Christa Canitz (New Brunswick, Canada) Philip Cardew (Leeds Beckett) Elizabeth Emery (Montclair State) David Matthews (Manchester) Gwendolyn Morgan (Montana State) Nils Holger Petersen (Copenhagen) D. S. Brewer is an imprim of Boydell & Brewer Ltd Tom Shippey (Saint Louis) PO Box 9, Woodbridge, Suffolk IP12 3DF, UK Ciare A. Simmons (Ohio State) and of Boydell & Brewer Inc, Paul Szarmach (Western Michigan) 668 Mt Hope Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620-2731, USA Toshiyuki Takamiya (Keio) website: www.boydellandbrewer.com Jane Toswell (Western Üntario) Richard Utz (Georgia Institute ofTechnology) Kathleen Verduin (Hope College, Michigan) A CIP catalogue record for this book is available Andrew Wawn (Leeds) from the British Library Studies in Medievalism provides an imerdisciplinary medium of exchange for scholars in ali fields, including the visual and other arts, concerned with any aspect of the post-medieval idea The publisher has no responsibiliry for the continued existence or and study of the Middle Ages and the influence, both scholarly and popular, of this study on accuracy of URLs for externa! or third-parry imernet websites referred to Western sociery after 1500. -
Car Free Day Map-Lores
E C C E J R O N H O PLA H A H NBU M A N T I GHW WELL L RY A Q TR S S S EET E UNDLE TREET T USE S S ARDEN R L A G R S E 43 E S I E S Steps T L H N 78 127-131 T L A EECH OOR T U RHOU Steps S H P L E K B T Project IGHW T 35 L Y R FARRIN GDORHO NR N N STRE CROWN ARDE L The Charterhouse F A Shakespeare M E C A L I S H S E X C H A N G E G Whitechapel O Gallery ’ KNO C O 1 201 E T The R X 67 T Old A S S QUA R E E R TON ARTE A Square School Tower M 2 125 102 ALK L I T T N Barbican L 1 K A TON WODEHAM R H 42 33 Steps Steps 1 I T T Y S T R E E T T S T REE R Farringdon URY 1 E D PRINC ELET B U K F Rookery C S C O 15 A N P EECH 37 S N N 20 T B Lift U 125 STRE E T H M R PRINCEL ET IRBY F T EET T 104 Steps E 32 GARDE R 34 STR E E 26 Bishops Spitalfields S H Steps M O I Cowcross Street E T T E 56 Barbican NSB E E D Centre C 5 E W L E A FOE HITE 30 N Lauderdale I C E T R V R OW R O S S S T R E T P L E Square K 73 S Y R F C C LA S A T 8 Guildhall School of A R Brady Arts & L E C I LK O CKINGTON ST 36 OSS S S H N N E P P PUM E S I A ALDER A CO 85 Tower Defoe S E Market U R T T 1 U PL L P M T I 60 O Barbican Library TREET A E 3 E A L H I 29 C E L AUDERDAL E Music & Drama - E Community A 93 K W R E R R NDSEY House N S T N L E T E S 6 P L ACE R R EET Brick Lane EET T N L S H 29 to 35 90 F S R S R T PEE 2 D ’ T 25 G L A Milton Court M Centre R R ULBO E C D C 89 H REE CLOTH Steps H S 95 A S C Steps Steps Y Jamme Masjid G Barbican I G T W E A 84 A R OURT E S H R ILSO A TREE NHITL L W E R E U A E 87 A ALK E L D KESIDE TER N O N N U 39 T ST S T Finsbury CL U 176 -
THE LONDON STONE: from MYTH and MYSTERY to CONTEMPORARY PLANNING Read by Alderman David Graves
THE LONDON STONE: FROM MYTH AND MYSTERY TO CONTEMPORARY PLANNING Read by Alderman David Graves 10 June 2013 The London Stone is a truly remarkable object. This is all the more surprising because, to look at, it is utterly unremarkable. It is, quite literally, a lump of seemingly unworked rock, a piece of oolitic limestone, to be precise, spanning hardly more than 50 centimetres in any dimension. It could sit inside a standard bankers’ box. Unusually for a lump of rock, it has an address: 111 Cannon Street, where it sits in a Portland stone cabinet at pavement level behind glass and a protective metal grille along the frontage of what is now a branch of WH Smith, with unremarkable office space above. For such an unassuming object in a similarly unassuming location, what makes the London Stone remarkable is its history. Much of its history is speculation, and could fairly be dismissed as legend, but what we know from reliable historic sources is sufficient to make this lump of rock worthy of note. The mythology goes back many thousands of years, its recorded history goes back several hundred years. As recently as 2011, the London Stone was the subject of a planning application—to move it into Minerva’s adjacent Walbrook building. As the London Stone is a Grade II* Listed object, this was no straightforward matter, and the application currently lies dormant on the file at the City of London’s Planning Department, although its status is recorded as “current”. The official text for the Listing reads: “Uncertain origin, possibly Roman milestone. -
The De Vere Society Newsletter January 2021 Newsletter 02Apro the DE VERE0 SOCIETY
The de Vere Society newsletter January 2021 newsletter 02Apro THE DE VERE0 SOCIETY ‘Report me and my cause aright To the unsatisfied.’ Hamlet, V. ii. Vol. 28, No. 1, January 2021 Page Oxfordian News: Notices and recent events 03 Band of Brothers: Edward de Vere and his Literary Circle in the 1580s 04 DVS Autumn Conference Webinar 2020: Introduction by Charles Beauclerk Presentations: Kevin Gilvary, Ian Johnson, Eddi Jolly and Alexander Waugh Speaking and singing interludes: Richard Clifford, Sir Derek Jacobi, Annabel Leventon, Charlie Limm and Frankie Paradiso. Mystery guest: Ron Destro Bridget de Vere’s Second Marriage to Sir Hugh Pollard by Jan Cole 15 A historical investigation that links Oxford’s daughter to Stratford, with an introduction by Alexander Waugh James Shapiro’s Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? 25 Review by April Drusiana with an editorial prologue by Jan Scheffer: Shapiro contradicts his own arguments Reviews: Renaissance Man: The World of Thomas Watson by Ian Johnson; 46 The Shakespeare Masterclasses by Ron Destro; Behind the Name Shakespeare: Power, Lust, Scorn & Scandal documentary film by Robin Phillips DVS Events: Forthcoming events and diary dates 51 Newsletter contributions welcome Contributors’ views are not necessarily those of the Society or of the Committee. Editor: Amanda Hinds. The next issue is planned for April 2021. If you would like to contribute a comment, letter or article, please contact the Editor or submit a Word document either to: [email protected] or by post to: The DVS, PO Box 1904, Southampton SO15 9LQ, UK. The DVS Newsletter is printed and distributed by Sarsen Press, Winchester, UK www.deveresociety.co.uk 1 FB | Twitter: @deveresocietyuk The de Vere Society newsletter January 2021 newsletter 02Apro THE DE VERE SOCIETY 0 PATRON: SIR DEREK JACOBI CBE | FOUNDER: CHARLES BEAUCLERK We welcome everyone who appreciates the works of Shakespeare and anyone who is interested in the Shakespeare Authorship Question.