DOCSLIB.ORG

4. Stakeholder Engagement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4. Stakeholder Engagement Deliverable D.2.3 Site and technology developers, project financers and authorities questionnaires Report on questionnaires March 2012 1 SOWFIA project synopsis The Streamlining of Ocean Wave Farms Impact Assessment (SOWFIA) Project (IEE/09/809/ SI2.558291) is an EU Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) funded project that draws together ten partners, across eight European countries, who are actively involved with planned wave farm test centres. The SOWFIA project aims to achieve the sharing and consolidation of pan- European experience of consenting processes and environmental and socio-economic impact assessment (IA) best practices for offshore wave energy conversion developments. Studies of wave farm demonstration projects in each of the collaborating EU nations are contributing to the findings. The study sites comprise a wide range of device technologies, environmental settings and stakeholder interests. Through project workshops, meetings, on-going communication and networking amongst project partners, ideas and experiences relating to IA and policy are being shared, and co-ordinated studies addressing key questions for wave energy development are being carried out. The overall goal of the SOWFIA project is to provide recommendations for approval process streamlining and European-wide streamlining of IA processes, thereby helping to remove legal, environmental and socio-economic barriers to the development of offshore power generation from waves. By utilising the findings from technology-specific monitoring at multiple sites, SOWFIA will accelerate knowledge transfer and promote European-wide expertise on environmental and socio-economic impact assessments of wave energy projects. In this way, the development of the future, commercial phase of offshore wave energy installations will benefit from the lessons learned from existing smaller-scale developments. 2 Grant Agreement number : IEE/09/809/SI2.558291 Project acronym: SOWFIA Project title: Streamlining of Ocean Wave Farms Impact Assessment Deliverable D2. 3 Site/Technology developers, project financers and authorities questionnaires Authors: Affiliation: Enrique Muñoz Arjona Marine Energy Business Unit, Cristina Huertas Olivares Inabensa, Sevilla, Spain. Davide Magagna School of Marine Science & Deborah Greaves Engineering, University of Plymouth, England. Anne Marie O’Hagan Hydraulics & Maritime Research Brian Holmes Centre, University College Cork, Ireland. Jan Sundberg Uppsala University, Sweden. Teresa Simas Centro de Energia das Ondas - Wave Sofia Patrício Energy Centre, Portugal. Yago Torre-Enciso Ente Vasco de la Energía (EVE), Bilbao, Spain. March 2012 “The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein” 3 Executive Summary The successful transition of wave energy conversion from the development phase to commercial reality is achieved not only through technological improvements but also through the implementation of a fit for purpose consenting process. A key condition for the improvement of the regulatory procedures is the assessment of the weakness and strength of the existing process. As part of the EU funded SOWFIA project, a “Stakeholders Questionnaire” was designed to determine what type of regulatory procedures site and device developers have gone through in developing their test site. The survey was aimed to gather EU-wide experience of the consenting process, with a particular focus on the way stakeholders were involved in the process and their concerns addressed. The Survey was circulated among EU test site developers, and to wave and tidal device developers. The stakeholder questionnaire was complemented by a “Finance and Authorities Survey” aimed to understand the reason behind funding and approving of test site developments in Europe. This survey was circulated among the six wave energy test sites involved with the SOWFIA projects: AMETS in Ireland, BIMEP in Spain, Lysekil in Sweden, Ocean Plug in Portugal, SEM-REV in France and the Wave Hub in the United Kingdom. This report presents the answers obtained by 16 different site and device developers in response to the surveys developed by the SOWFIA project. The information gathered is organised to reflect the structures of the two questionnaires to allow for a quick comparison between different test sites. Key points gathered are hereby summarized: • Consenting procedures: Each country has implemented the EIA 85/337/EEC and Naturas 2000 in different ways leading to discrepancies in the consenting process in Europe. • Formal and informal stakeholder engagement: Many site and device developers have approached stakeholder using informal approached aside from regulation requirements • Response from stakeholders: Fisheries groups represent a common denominator in terms of stakeholders groups for wave and tidal energy development. • Concerns raised: Concerns predominantly involved issues of navigation safety, fishing areas and impacts on marine life. • Opinion of the consenting process and lessons learned: Approaching stakeholders early and establishing open discussion is key to reduce stakeholders’ concerns. • Financing: Test sites often financed by local or national government in conjunction with EU. • Authorities: Approval given on the basis of existing regulations and considering renewable energy obligations. This document shows the results obtained from an EU wide survey of site and device developers, and aims to present the reader with an overview of the experience to date in terms of consenting process and stakeholder engagement. A more in-depth analysis of the results obtained will be carried out within the SOWFIA project, integrating the work of these surveys with the results obtained. 4 Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 8 2. General Description of Site ......................................................................................... 9 2.1. Test Sites ............................................................................................................ 9 2.2. Additional Sites ................................................................................................. 11 2.3. Wave Power developers .................................................................................... 12 2.4. Tidal Stream Developers .................................................................................... 17 3. Consents Required and Stakeholder Engagement in the Consenting Process ............. 19 3.1. Test Sites .......................................................................................................... 19 3.2. Additional Sites ................................................................................................. 22 3.3. Wave Power Developers.................................................................................... 23 3.4. Tidal Stream Developers .................................................................................... 25 4. Stakeholder Engagement .......................................................................................... 27 4.1. Test Sites .......................................................................................................... 27 4.2. Additional Sites ................................................................................................. 29 4.3. Wave Power Developers.................................................................................... 30 4.4. Tidal Stream Developers .................................................................................... 31 5. Public and Stakeholder Awareness ............................................................................ 32 5.1. Test Sites .......................................................................................................... 32 5.2. Additional Sites ................................................................................................. 33 5.3. Wave Power Developers.................................................................................... 33 5.4. Tidal Stream Developers .................................................................................... 34 6. Stakeholder Engagement in the Consultation Process ................................................ 35 6.1. Test Sites .......................................................................................................... 35 6.2. Additional Sites ................................................................................................. 38 6.3. Wave Power Developers.................................................................................... 39 6.4. Tidal Stream Developers: ................................................................................... 42 7. Stakeholder Concerns ............................................................................................... 43 7.1. Test Sites .......................................................................................................... 43 7.2. Additional Sites ................................................................................................. 45 7.3. Wave Power Developers.................................................................................... 46 7.4. Tidal Stream Developers ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT on OCEAN ENERGY SYSTEMS
    ANNUAL REPORT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT on OCEAN ENERGY SYSTEMS 2014 ANNUAL REPORT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT on OCEAN ENERGY SYSTEMS 2014 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Published by: The Executive Committee of Ocean Energy Systems Edited by: Ana Brito e Melo and José Luis Villate Designed by: Formas do Possível | www.formasdopossivel.com Disclaimer: Ocean Energy Systems (OES), also known as the Implementing Agreement on Ocean Energy Systems, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of the OES do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries. CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE 04 6. COUNTRY REPORTS PORTUGAL 44 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 05 DENMARK 49 UNITED KINGDOM 52 1. INTRODUCTION IRELAND 64 Vision, Role and Values 11 CANADA 69 The OES Vision for International Deployment of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 75 Ocean Energy 12 BELGIUM 84 Benefits from International Collaboration 13 NORWAY 86 Key OES Achievements in 2014 14 MEXICO 89 SPAIN 92 2. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE ITALY 96 COMMITTEE NEW ZEALAND 102 Membership 15 SWEDEN 104 Executive Committee 18 SOUTH AFRICA 110 Management & Work Programme 19 REPUBLIC OF KOREA 111 Interaction with the IEA 20 CHINA 116 NIGERIA 120 3. DISSEMINATION AND OUTREACH MONACO 120 Collection and Exchange of Information 21 SINGAPORE 122 Sponsorship and Co-hosting of Conferences and Workshops 23 THE NETHERLANDS 129 Presence in Main Events 25 Promotional Material 26 7. STATISTICAL OVERVIEW OF OCEAN ENERGY IN 2014 4. ONGOING COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS Worldwide Ocean Power Installed Capacity 132 Open Sea Testing Assessment of Environmental Effects and Monitoring 134 Efforts (Annex IV) 27 Major Industry Players Involved in R&D and Demonstration Projects 135 Exchange and Assessment of Ocean Energy Device Project Information and Experience (Annex V) 31 Worldwide Web GIS Database for Ocean Energy 33 8.
    [Show full text]
  • EERR M 03 Energías De Las Olas, Mareas
    Energías Renovables Marinas Las trasparencias son el material de apoyo del profesor para impartir la clase. No son apuntes de la asignatura. Al alumno le pueden servir como guía para recopilar información (libros, …) y elaborar sus propios apuntes Departamento: Ingeniería Eléctrica y Energética Area: Máquinas y Motores Térmicos CARLOS J RENEDO [email protected] Despachos: ETSN 236 / ETSIIT S-3 28 http://personales.unican.es/renedoc/index.htm Tlfn: ETSN 942 20 13 44 / ETSIIT 942 20 13 82 1 Energías Renovables Marinas • Introducción • Panorama Energético Nacional • Algunas “Curiosidades” Parte 1ª • Las EERR en la Unión Europea • Visión de las Energías Renovables • Búsqueda de Información Científica Parte 2ª Virtual • Energías de las Olas y Mareas Parte 3ª • Tecnologías de Aprovechamiento Parte 4ª Virtual • Energía Térmica Marina Parte 5ª • Turbinas Hidráulicas Parte 6ª • Algas Marinas Parte 7ª 2 Energías Renovables Marinas Centrales en Europa: 3 Energías Renovables Marinas Centrales en Europa: Objetivo en 2020 paso de 3.6 a 2.2 GW 4 Energías Renovables Marinas Energía de las Mareas (Tidal Energy) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Centrales en Operación (2010) CENTRAL MW PAIS AÑO Sihwa Lake Tidal Power Station 254 South Korea 2011 Rance Tidal Power Station 240 France 1966 Annapolis Royal Generating Station 20 Canada 1984 Jiangxia Tidal Power Station 3.2 China 1980 Kislaya Guba Tidal Power Station 1.7 Russia 1968 Uldolmok Tidal Power Station 1.5 South Korea 2009 Strangford Lough SeaGen 1.2 United Kingdom 2008 Centrales en Construcción
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation of Wave Power Plants to Regions with High Tides
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1795 Adaptation of wave power plants to regions with high tides MOHD NASIR AYOB ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-513-0627-8 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-381169 2019 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Room 2001, Ångströmlaboratoriet, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Uppsala, Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 09:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Ian Masters (Swansea University). Abstract Ayob, M. N. 2019. Adaptation of wave power plants to regions with high tides. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1795. 53 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0627-8. The wave energy converter (WEC) developed at Uppsala University is based on the concept of a heaving point absorber with a linear generator placed on the seafloor. The translator inside the generator oscillates in a linear fashion and is connected via a steel wire to a point absorbing buoy. The power production from this device is optimal when the translator’s oscillations are centered with respect to the stator. However, due to the tides, the mean translator position may shift towards the upper or lower limits of the generator’s stroke length, thereby affecting the power production. This effect will be severe if the WEC operates in an area characterized by a high tidal range. The translator may be stuck at the top or rest at the bottom of the generator for a considerable amount of time daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Wave Energy Test Centres
    Deliverable D.2.1 Catalogue of Wave Energy Test Centres March 20111 1Update September 2012 Grant Agreement IEE/09/809/SI2.558291 (1/10/2010 -30/09/2013), 4/11/2010 SOWFIA Streamlining of Ocean Wave Farms Impact Assessment SOWFIA project synopsis The Streamlining of Ocean Wave Farms Impact Assessment (SOWFIA) Project (IEE/09/809/ SI2.558291) is an EU Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) funded project that draws together ten partners, across eight European countries, who are actively involved with planned wave farm test centres. The SOWFIA project aims to achieve the sharing and consolidation of pan- European experience of consenting processes and environmental and socio-economic impact assessment (IA) best practices for offshore wave energy conversion developments. Studies of wave farm demonstration projects in each of the collaborating EU nations are contributing to the findings. The study sites comprise a wide range of device technologies, environmental settings and stakeholder interests. Through project workshops, meetings, ongoing communication and networking amongst project partners, ideas and experiences relating to IA and policy are being shared, and co-ordinated studies addressing key questions for wave energy development are being carried out. The overall goal of the SOWFIA project is to provide recommendations for approval process streamlining and European-wide streamlining of IA processes, thereby helping to remove legal, environmental and socio-economic barriers to the development of offshore power generation from waves. By utilising the findings from technology-specific monitoring at multiple sites, SOWFIA will accelerate knowledge transfer and promote European-wide expertise on environmental and socio-economic impact assessments of wave energy projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Energy from the North Sea: Experiences from the Lysekil Research Site
    Surv Geophys (2008) 29:221–240 DOI 10.1007/s10712-008-9047-x ORIGINAL PAPER Wave Energy from the North Sea: Experiences from the Lysekil Research Site Mats Leijon Æ Cecilia Bostro¨m Æ Oskar Danielsson Æ Stefan Gustafsson Æ Kalle Haikonen Æ Olivia Langhamer Æ Erland Stro¨mstedt Æ Magnus Sta˚lberg Æ Jan Sundberg Æ Olle Svensson Æ Simon Tyrberg Æ Rafael Waters Received: 9 April 2008 / Accepted: 23 September 2008 / Published online: 10 October 2008 Ó The Author(s) 2008. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This paper provides a status update on the development of the Swedish wave energy research area located close to Lysekil on the Swedish West coast. The Lysekil project is run by the Centre for Renewable Electric Energy Conversion at Uppsala Uni- versity. The project was started in 2004 and currently has permission to run until the end of 2013. During this time period 10 grid-connected wave energy converters, 30 buoys for studies on environmental impact, and a surveillance tower for monitoring the interaction between waves and converters will be installed and studied. To date the research area holds one complete wave energy converter connected to a measuring station on shore via a sea cable, a Wave RiderTM buoy for wave measurements, 25 buoys for studies on environ- mental impact, and a surveillance tower. The wave energy converter is based on a linear synchronous generator which is placed on the sea bed and driven by a heaving point absorber at the ocean surface. The converter is directly driven, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Constant DC Link Voltage Operation of a Wave Energy Converter
    Energies 2013, 4, 1993-2006; doi:10.3390/en6041993 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Article Optimal Constant DC Link Voltage Operation of a Wave Energy Converter Venugopalan Kurupath *, Rickard Ekstrom¨ and Mats Leijon Division of Electricity, Swedish Centre for Renewable Electric Energy Conversion, P.O. Box 534, 751 21 Uppsala, Sweden; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.E); [email protected] (M.L) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-18-4717256; Fax: +46-18-4715810. Received: 6 February 2013; in revised form: 21 March 2013 / Accepted: 22 March 2013 / Published: 8 April 2013 Abstract: This article proposes a simple and reliable damping strategy for wave power farm operation of small-scale point-absorber converters. The strategy is based on passive rectification onto a constant DC-link, making it very suitable for grid integration of the farm. A complete model of the system has been developed in Matlab Simulink, and uses real site data as input. The optimal constant DC-voltage is evaluated as a function of the significant wave height and energy period of the waves. The total energy output of the WEC is derived for one year of experimental site data. The energy output is compared for two cases, one where the optimal DC-voltage is determined and held constant at half-hour basis throughout the year, and one where a selected value of the DC-voltage is kept constant throughout the year regardless of sea state. Keywords: wave energy; DC link voltage control; point absorber; linear generator 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of the Operational Noise from Full Scale Wave Energy Converters in the Lysekil Project: Estimation of Potential Environmental Impacts
    Energies 2013, 6, 2562-2582; doi:10.3390/en6052562 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Article Characteristics of the Operational Noise from Full Scale Wave Energy Converters in the Lysekil Project: Estimation of Potential Environmental Impacts Kalle Haikonen *, Jan Sundberg and Mats Leijon Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 534, Uppsala 751 25, Sweden; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (M.L.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-18-471-5818; Fax: +46-18-471-5810. Received: 5 February 2013; in revised form: 10 May 2013 / Accepted: 14 May 2013 / Published: 21 May 2013 Abstract: Wave energy conversion is a clean electric power production technology. During operation there are no emissions in the form of harmful gases. However there are unsolved issues considering environmental impacts such as: electromagnetism; the artificial reef effect and underwater noise. Anthropogenic noise is increasing in the oceans worldwide and wave power will contribute to this sound pollution in the oceans; but to what extent? The main purpose of this study was to examine the noise emitted by a full scale operating Wave Energy Converter (WEC) in the Lysekil project at Uppsala University in Sweden. A minor review of the hearing capabilities of fish and marine mammals is presented to aid in the conclusions of impact from anthropogenic sound. A hydrophone was deployed to the seabed in the Lysekil research site park at distance of 20 and 40 m away from two operational WECs.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Control and Measurement System Used in the Low Voltage Marine Substation at the Lysekil Research Site
    Description of the control and measurement system used in the Low Voltage Marine Substation at the Lysekil research site O. Svensson, C. Boström, M. Rahm and M. Leijon Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, Box 534, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Abstract sea-based substation. But the wave power park is different from a wind power park or a This paper gives a description of the control hydro power plant, especially the wave power and measurement system inside the Low concept suggested by Uppsala University, Voltage Marine Substation at the Lysekil which consists of many small units. This Research site located close to Lysekil on the makes it hard to use a control and Swedish west coast. The Lysekil project is run measurement system designed for a land by the Swedish Centre for Renewable Electric based substation in the national grid which is Energy Conversion at Uppsala University. designed with a few high-power inputs. This The control and measurement system paper describes a control system developed on consists of three PACs, Programmable the National Instrument CompactRIO Automation Controllers, inside the Marine platform. Substation. Each PAC is dedicated to one of the tasks safety and relay-control, DC to AC Research site overview inversion and data-acquisition. One PAC controls the land based measuring-station. The The Lysekil research site consists of three system has been tested with the control WECs (Wave Energy Converter), one LVMS algorithm constant modulation index. The (Low Voltage Marine Substation) and one control algorithms constant DC level and land based measuring-station.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Modelling and Mechanical Studies on a Point Absorber Type Wave Energy Converter
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1443 Numerical Modelling and Mechanical Studies on a Point Absorber Type Wave Energy Converter YUE HONG ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-554-9731-6 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305650 2016 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in 80101, Ångströmlaboratoriet, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Uppsala, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 at 13:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Researcher Jørgen Hals Todalshaug (Norwegian University of Science and Technology). Abstract Hong, Y. 2016. Numerical Modelling and Mechanical Studies on a Point Absorber Type Wave Energy Converter. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1443. 76 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9731-6. Oceans cover two thirds of the Earth’s surface and the energy potential of ocean waves as a renewable energy source is huge. It would therefore be a tremendous achievement if the vast mechanical energy in waves was converted into a form of energy that could be used successfully by society. For years, scientists and engineers have endeavored to exploit this renewable energy by inventing various generators designed to transform wave energy into electrical energy. Generally, this sort of generator is called a Wave Energy Converter (WEC). In this thesis, the research is based on the WEC developed in the Lysekil Project. The Lysekil Project is led by a research group at Uppsala University and has a test site located on the west coast of Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Investigation of a Novel Direct Mechanical Drive Wave Energy Converter Vishnu Vijayasankar1, Gundi Amarnath2, S
    Experimental Investigation of a Novel Direct Mechanical Drive Wave Energy Converter Vishnu Vijayasankar1, Gundi Amarnath2, S. A. Sannasiraj3, Abdus Samad4 Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— In the present work, a unique design using a direct mechanical drive based power takeoff system is Indirect Drive proposed, designed, fabricated and tested for a point absorber. The power take-off mechanism in the design Rotary Air Chamber/ Air Turbine/ Generator consists of rack and pinion arrangement, which converts Accumulator Hydro Turbine the bidirectional reciprocating motion to unidirectional rotation. This mechanism is fixed on top of an oscillating G Direct Mechanical buoy. The model is tested in a 4m wave flume to measure Drive various parameters like Response Amplitude Operator of the buoy, capture width, electric power output and Direct Drive Linear Generator absorption efficiency for different wave height and Direct Electrical Drive periods. The model is also tested for friction outside the To Grid flume. The experiments revealed some promising results Fig. 1 Flow paths for different PTO mechanisms that can be taken forward for further investigations. Out of all PTO mechanisms, the most widely used one is the air turbine coupled to an oscillating water column, which Keywords— wave energy, point absorber, rack and pinion, is an indirect drive mechanism. Even though it has high power take-off mechanism. reliability due to simplicity in working, the efficiency is very low [2][6]. Pelamis [7] uses another indirect drive method I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Wave Energy: Underwater Substation System for Wave Energy
    ! " #$#%#""#&' ISBN 5675777 8 7 9 7 : 7 8 8 8 ; 5 8 7 ; < =:< 7 ; 8 7 8 ! " !" !# $%&'! !"()%*+* ! > ;?979 ;@?5675777 75A CC 8C D E 75F Till min älskade son, Emil. List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Stålberg, M., Waters, R., Eriksson, M., Danielsson, O., Thorburn, K., Bernhoff, H., and Leijon, M. “Full-Scale Testing of PM Linear Gener- ator for Point Absorber WEC”. Proceedings of the 6th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, EWTEC, Glasgow, UK, September, 2005. II Waters, R., Stålberg, M., Danielsson, O., Svensson, O., Gustafsson, S., Strömstedt, E., Eriksson, M., Sundberg, J., and Leijon, M. “Experimen- tal results from sea trials of an offshore wave energy system”. Applied Physics Letters, 90:034105, 2007. III Stålberg, M., Waters, R., Danielsson, O., and Leijon, M. “Influence of Generator Damping on Peak Power and Variance of Power for a Di- rect Drive Wave Energy Converter”. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 130(3), 2008. IV Waters, R., Rahm, M., Svensson, O., Strömstedt, E., Boström, C., Sundberg, J., and Leijon, M. “Energy absorption in response to wave frequency and amplitude - offshore experiments on a wave energy converter”. Submitted to AIP Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, January 20, 2010. V Engström, J., Waters, R., Stålberg, M., Strömstedt, E., Eriksson, M., Isberg, J., Henfridsson, U., Bergman, K., Asmussen, J., and Leijon, M. “Offshore experiments on a direct-driven Wave Energy Converter”. Proceedings of the 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, EWTEC, Porto, Portugal, September, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Generator-Based Wave Energy Converter Model
    IET Renewable Power Generation Research Article ISSN 1752-1416 Linear generator-based wave energy Received on 20th March 2015 Revised on 20th July 2015 converter model with experimental Accepted on 8th September 2015 doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0117 verification and three loading strategies www.ietdl.org Yue Hong1 ✉, Mikael Eriksson2, Valeria Castellucci1, Cecilia Boström1, Rafael Waters1,2 1Division for Electricity, Uppsala University, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden 2Department of Engineering Sciences, Seabased AB, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden ✉ E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Within the Lysekil wave energy research project at the Swedish west coast, more than ten Wave Energy Converters (WECs) prototypes have been developed and installed in an ocean based test site. Since 2006 various experiments have been conducted and the generated electricity was delivered to shore at a nearby island. While experiments are essential for the development of wave energy converters, theoretical studies and simulations are an important complement – not only in the search for advanced designs with higher efficiency, but also for improving the economic viability of the studied concepts. In this paper a WEC model is presented. The model consists of three subsystems: i) the hydrodynamic source, ii) the linear generator model, and iii) the electrical conversion system. After the validation with the experimental results at the research site, the generator model is connected to three passive load strategies – linear resistive load, passive rectification and resonance circuit. The paper focuses on analysing the operation of the model coupled with three load cases. The results prove that the WEC model correctly simulates the linear generator developed in the Lysekil Project.
    [Show full text]