Argentine Ants on Santa Cruz Island, California: Conservation Issues and Management Options Island Invasives: Eradication and Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Randall, J.M.; K.R. Faulkner, C. Boser, C. Cory, P. Power, L.A Vermeer, L. Lozier, and S.A. Morrison. Argentine ants on Santa Cruz Island, California: conservation issues and management options Island invasives: eradication and management Argentine ants on Santa Cruz Island, California: conservation issues and management options J. M. Randall1, K. R. Faulkner2, C. Boser1, C. Cory1, P. Power2, L. A. Vermeer1, L. Lozier1, and S. A. Morrison1 1The Nature Conservancy, 201 Mission Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105, U.S.A. <[email protected]>. 2Channel Islands National Park, 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, California 93001, U.S.A. Abstract Non-native Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) have established on California’s Santa Cruz Island but are apparently not yet widespread. Santa Cruz Island is a highly valued conservation area, harbouring a large number of endemic plants and animals, and communities now rare in mainland California. Following eradication of non-native vertebrates and honeybees, Argentine ants were regarded as one of the major remaining threats to native biodiversity on the island. They were first detected at a single site in 1996 and were found at two more by 2004. Surveys in 2009 and 2010 showed that they had spread to three small sites along the lower reaches of the Island’s largest waterway. They were not detected at 15 other sites on the island with heavy human use, or at 12 beaches used by recreational boaters. In 2009, we convened an expert working group which confirmed that Argentine ants are a serious threat to the island’s biodiversity and recommended a management framework to: 1) detect and delimit L. humile; 2) implement biosecurity measures and engage island residents and visitors to prevent further spread and re-invasion; and, 3) contain and reduce existing infestations using toxic baits. In response, we launched a management framework with the goal of containing and perhaps ultimately eradicating this notorious invader from the island. Keywords: Biodiversity conservation, eradication, feasibility assessment, island restoration, Linepithema humile INTRODUCTION There are approximately 20,000 species of ants on recognised as a cause for concern. Today the ants are likely Earth (Ward 2006) but only about 150 species, fewer than the most damaging invasive species remaining on the 1% of the total, are known to have established outside their island. To assess the extent of the threat it poses, presence/ native ranges after dispersal by humans (McGlynn 1999). absence surveys of Argentine ants were conducted around Most of the introduced species are restricted to human- the three previously recorded infestations and other high modified habitats, but a small subset has spread into natural human use sites on the island. We also convened an on-site environments where they have significant and sometimes meeting of 18 experts on Argentine ant ecology and control disproportionate negative effects on native biological and conservation land management from the U.S. and New diversity. Six species of ants are particularly widespread, Zealand to advise us on a course of action. Here we present abundant, and damaging worldwide (Holway et al. 2002), findings from those efforts. including the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Many studies have documented harmful effects of Argentine ants HISTORY OF ISLAND MANGEMENT AND on native ants, other invertebrates, some vertebrates, plants ARGENTINE ANT INVASION and plant communities, and in countries that include New Zealand (Ward and Harris 2005; Ward 2009), Australia The arthropod fauna of Santa Cruz Island is not fully (Walters and Mackay 2003; Rowles and O’Dowd 2007, known but includes at least 8 endemic insect taxa (Miller 2009), South Africa (Buys 1987; Christian 2001), the 1985; Schoenherr et al. 1999). More systematic collections Mediterranean region (Way et al. 1997; Quilichini and of ants have revealed 32 native species. None of these Debussche 2000), and in California (Ward 1987; Gambino are endemic although Messor chamberlini is relatively 1990; Human and Gordon 1997; Sockman 1997; Holway common on the island but quite restricted and rare on the 1998, 1999; Bolger et al. 2000; Fisher et al. 2002; Suarez California mainland (D. Holway, UC San Diego pers. and Case 2002; Suarez et al. 2000) where they are invasive comm.). Besides the Argentine ant, the only other non- in coastal areas and the Central Valley. As with other native ant species on the island is Cardiocondyla ectopia invaders, islands seem to have been particularly vulnerable (Wetterer et al. 2000); however, its known extent is small to the harmful effects of invasive ants (O’Dowd et al. 2003; and it is currently not a species of concern. Lach and Hooper-Bui 2010). For example, Argentine ants Santa Cruz Island has a long record of human occupation have been particularly damaging on the island of Maui and use, dating back at least 7000 years (Glasow 1980). By (Cole et al. 1992). the time the effort to set the island aside as a conservation Santa Cruz Island (250 km2) is approximately 40 km area began in the late 1970s, Santa Cruz harboured large south of Santa Barbara, California and is the largest of populations of several non-native animals and many species the eight California Channel Islands. A highly valued of invasive plants. Particularly damaging were thousands conservation area, it falls entirely within Channel Islands of feral sheep (Ovis aries) and pigs (Sus scrofa) as well as National Park although just 24% of it is owned and managed smaller numbers of cattle (Bos taurus), all of which had by the U.S. National Park Service (NPS). The remaining been intentionally introduced in the mid-1800s (Junak et 76% is owned and managed cooperatively by The Nature al. 1995). These ungulates severely damaged vegetation on Conservancy (TNC), an international conservation the island, stripping much of the island almost completely organisation. The island harbours at least 21 endemic taxa of plant cover, leading to severe erosion (Brumbaugh et of animals (insects, birds, mammals, and herptiles) and 8 al. 1982). endemic taxa of plants (Junak et al. 1995; Schoenherr et By 2006, NPS and TNC successfully eliminated cattle, al. 1999). It also supports many other species found on feral sheep and feral pigs, which allowed a spectacular some of the other Channel Islands but not on the mainland, recovery of native vegetation in many areas (Junak et al. as well as several plant communities now rare on the 1995; Morrison 2007). Feral honeybees (Apis mellifera) California mainland. were also eliminated from the island by the early 2000s, Argentine ants were first detected on Santa Cruz reducing threats to native bees as well as pollination Island in 1996 (Calderwood et al. 1999) and were quickly services provided to invasive plants favoured by honeybees (Wenner and Thorp 1994; Barthell et al. 2001). Pages 108-113 In: Veitch, C. R.; Clout, M. N. and Towns, D. R. (eds.). 2011. Island invasives: eradication and management. IUCN,108 Gland, Switzerland. Randall et al.: Argentine ants on Santa Cruz I., California Argentine ants were first detected on Santa Cruz known infestations (1997 and 1998 for the Valley Anchorage Island in 1996 (Calderwood et al. 1999) and were quickly and Blue sites; 2004 for the UC Field Station site). These recognised as a cause for concern. In 1997 and 1998, distances were based on Argentine ant invasion expansion delimitation surveys were conducted around areas where rates of 10 to 100 m/yr recorded elsewhere in California Argentine ants had been detected and in other locations (Holway 1998). Each bait station consisted of a 3 x 5 inch with a recent history of human use and movement of (7.6 x 12.7 cm) paper card with a few drops of organic goods (Calderwood et al. 1999). Infestations were maple syrup and several small pecan (Carya illinoinensis) found at two sites, one covering approximately 1.5 km2 nut pieces. Bait stations were revisited 30-120 minutes (hereafter referred to as the Valley Anchorage site) and after they were set out, and the presence and quantity (1, the other covering 0.04 km2 (hereafter, the Blue site). The 2-10, >10, >100) of Argentine ants on or immediately larger infestation was of a size consistent with arrival of adjacent to the stations was recorded (Coastal Restoration the ants 5 to 10 years before the surveys were conducted Consultants 2009). Other ants on or immediately adjacent (Calderwood et al. 1999). Both infestations appeared to to the stations were identified to genus where possible and radiate from sites of U.S. Navy installations dismantled in recorded (data not reported here). 1995, which led Calderwood et al. (1999) to speculate that On 13-15 November 2009 and 21-24 June 2010, more heavy equipment transported to the island for use in these detailed surveys were conducted in the Cañada del Medio installations may have carried Argentine ants. The surveys and Cañada del Puerto drainage and riparian areas, i.e. from also found that native ants were largely absent wherever approximately 100 m upstream of the Field Station, to the Argentine ants were established (Wetterer et al. 2000, drainage’s mouth at Prisoner’s Harbor, approximately 5.5 2001). Unfortunately, no control action was taken at that km downstream of the Field Station. This catchment was time, in part because problems caused by invasive feral judged most likely to harbour additional infestations since it pigs (Sus scrofa) were severe and given higher priority. is downstream of the Field Station infestation, and is used as Both sites thus remained infested (Fig. 1). the primary transportation corridor from the island’s north There are two building complexes in the central valley coast to its interior. The surveys used a sucrose-water mix of the island: a historic ranch compound that serves as or a sweet gel (the non-toxic attractant in Xstinguish Ant the island headquarters for The Nature Conservancy, and Bait produced by Bait Technology of New Zealand; www.