DOCSLIB.ORG

Coleoptera: Cleridae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coleoptera: Cleridae) AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Bruce Dudley Cowan for the M. S. in Entomology (Name) (Degree) (Major) Date thesis is presented April 12, 1965 Title THE BIOLOGIES OF PREDATORS (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) OF THE DOUGLAS -FIR BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PSEUDOTSUGAE HOPKINS ( COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), IN WESTERN OREGON Abstract approved (Major Professor) Six species of Cleridae, including Enoclerus spegeus Fabricius, E. lecontei Wolcott, E. schaefferi (Barr), E. eximius Mannerheim, Thanasimus undatulus Say, and an undescribed species of Enoclerus, were found on Douglas -fir in western Oregon. E. sphegeus was the only clerid of the six species studied which was primarily associated with the Douglas -fir beetle, as the other clerids occurred more often with Scolytus unispinosus or other small scolytids. E. sphegeus and T. undatulus each had a life span of two years, the first year of which was spent in the immature stages. E. sphegeus and T. undatulus adults emerged during the latter part of the summer, apparently overwintered in bark crevices, and appeared on Douglas - fir beetle- infested trees the following spring. Both species survived as adults approximately a year in the field, and E. sphegeus lived up to nearly a year and a half in the laboratory. E. lecontei adults emerged throughout the summer, survived no more than two months in the laboratory, and gave no indication of overwintering in the adult stage. Clerids mated frequently throughout their adult life. Mating ap- peared to be stimulated by a pheromone produced by the females. Two larval instars were found in E. sphegeus, three in T. unda- tulus, E. lecontei, and Enoclerus sp. , and four in E. schaefferi, al- though none of the E. schaefferi larvae pupated. E. sphegeus larvae fed on all stages of Douglas -fir beetle brood during the first instar, and fed mostly on Douglas -fir beetles from the third instar to callow adult in the early part of the second instar. After the first few weeks, most second instar larvae did not feed, but left the Douglas -fir beetle galleries and remained relatively inactive throughout the winter and spring in pupal cells, constructed in the outer bark of infested trees or in chunks of partly decayed bark on the ground, until the following July or August when they pupated. A few prepupal larvae in the outer bark were parasitized by a species of Ichneumonidae. E. sphegeus adults apparently did not consume their potential of Douglas -fir beetles in the field due to lack of available Douglas -fir beetle adults throughout most of the year. E. sphegeus larvae were rather ineffective as predators, since they occurred mainly where Douglas -fir beetle gallery density was high, and merely reduced competition of Douglas -fir beetle brood rather than causing a decrease in the population. THE BIOLOGIES OF PREDATORS (COLEOPTERA :CLERIDAE) OF THE DOUGLAS -FIR BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PSEUDOTSUGAE HOPKINS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), IN WESTERN OREGON by BRUCE DUDLEY COWAN A A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1965 APPROVED: Assistant Professor of Entomology In Charge of Major Chairman of Department of Entomology Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented April 12, 1965 Typed by Marion F. Palmateer ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer would like to express his deep appreciation to the following people for their help in the preparation of this thesis: To Dr. William P. Nagel who helped outline the project, care- fully reviewed the thesis, and offered many helpful suggestions. To Dr. Julius A. Rudinsky under whom the project originated. To Dr. Kenneth E. Rowe for his suggestions concerning statisti- cal analysis of sampling data. To Orlo Jantz, Gary Daterman, Willard Harwood, Gordon Howse, John McGhehey, and Richard Johnsey who helped in the col- lection of data. To my wife, Judy, for her encouragement, understanding, and helpful comments regarding the writing of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 The Douglas -fir Beetle . 3 Enoclerus sphegeus Fabricius . .. 5 Seasonal History 8 Host Attraction . 10 Feeding 10 Larval Mortality 13 Sex Determination 13 Enoclerus lecontei Wolcott . 14 Thanasimus undatulus Say 15 Enoclerus schaefferi (Barr) 17 Enoclerus eximius Mannerheim . 18 Other Predators 18 Principles of Predation 20 METHODS 23 Studies of Adult Cleridae 23 Emergence 24 Overwintering 25 Feeding 25 Mating and Oviposition . 26 Clerid Density Observations 27 Lincoln Index 28 Studies of Larval Development . 29 Instar Determination and Growth Rates . 30 Larval Migration 32 Bark Samples 32 Statistical Computations 33 Page RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 37 Studies of Adult Cleridae 40 Sex Determination 40 Emergence 40 Adult Seasonal History 43 Mating and Oviposition 52 Studies of Larval Development 57 Seasonal History and Development 65 Larval Feeding 76 Studies of Predator Effectiveness 77 SUMMARY 90 BIBLIOGRAPHY 93 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Enoclerus sphegeus approaching a Douglas -fir beetle . 12 2 Emergence of adult Cleridae in 1963, from logs in- fested with Douglas -fir beetles and Scolytus unispino- sus 44 3 Adult life span of three species of Cleridae in the field 47 4 Seasonal occurrence of E. sphegeus adults and Douglas - fir beetle adults, observed in five -minute periods on the bark surface of two trees, compared with accumu- lated Douglas -fir beetle attacks 49 5 Enoclerus sphegeus copulating 55 6 Seasonal history of immature development of E. sphegeus collected during 1963 and 1964 70 7 Seasonal history of immature development of E. lecontei collected during 1963 and 1964 71 8 Seasonal history of immature development of E. sphegeus and Douglas -fir beetle during the summer of 1964 74 9 Average densities of E. sphegeus larvae under bark during the summer of 1964 75 10 Line of regression for E. sphegeus larval densities, related to inches of Douglas -fir beetle parent gallery per square foot, from July 1 to September 5, 1964 . 87 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Emergence of different species of Cleridae from logs containing Douglas -fir beetle broods and ma- terial containing Scolytus unispinosus broods in 1963 39 2 Douglas -fir beetle adults killed or eaten per preda- tor per day at 75°F. by adult Cleridae continually supplied with living prey for 30 days 39 3 Adult insects eaten, attacked, or ignored by adult E. sphegeus in the field and /or laboratory 45 4 Densities of E. sphegeus adults, observed on the bark surface of two windthrown trees, related to Douglas -fir beetle attack densities, from May 10 to June 30, 1964 51 5 Average number of eggs laid by E. sphegeus in the laboratory at 75°F. throughout each month of active adult life span 53 6 Maximum number of eggs laid by one female preda- tor in the laboratory at 75°F 53 7 Head capsule widths of the larval instars of Cleridae in millimeters 59 8 Development of five species of Cleridae at 70° F . 60 9 Development of E. sphegeus at different temperatures 61 10 Development of E. lecontei at different temperatures 62 11 Development of T. undatulus at different temperatures 63 12 Development of Cleridae from egg to adult at different temperatures, from Tables 8, 9, 10, and 11 . 64 Table Page 13 Square -foot bark samples containing different densi- ties of E. sphegeus larvae from July to September, in 1963 and 1964 78 14 Douglas -fir beetle brood survival related to different densities of E. sphegeus larvae during the summer of 1964 83 15 Difference of Douglas -fir beetle brood survival in samples containing 3 -7 E. sphegeus larvae and samples containing no E. sphegeus (Table 14). 84 16 E. sphegeus larval densities related to inches of Douglas -fir beetle parent gallery per square foot of bark, from July 1 to September 5, 1964 85 17 Survival of Douglas -fir beetle brood from August 1 to August 15, 1964, in 12 samples with three to seven E. sphegeus larvae and 12 samples with no E. sphegeus, where samples were paired according to Douglas -fir beetle parent gallery length and density . 89 LIST OF PLATES Plate Page 1 Adult Cleridae: A, Enoclerus sphegeus; B, Eno- clerus lecontei; C, Enoclerus sp. ; D, Thanasimus undatulus 7 2 Ventral view of the abdomen of E. sphegeus, showing external sex differences: A, male; B, female . 42 3 Immature development of Enoclerus sphegeus: A, eggs; B, first instar larva newly hatched; C, first instar larva in pre -molt form; D, second instar larva as orange, feeding form; E, mature, lilac - colored second instar larva; F, pupa 67 4 Enoclerus sphegeus adult attacking a Douglas -fir beetle 81 THE BIOLOGIES OF PREDATORS (COLEOPTERA :CLERIDAE) OF THE DOUGLAS -FIR BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PSEUDOTSUGAE HOPKINS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), IN WESTERN OREGON INTRODUCTION The Douglas -fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), is one of the most destructive insects of Douglas -fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb. ) Franco, throughout its range. In western Oregon the Douglas -fir beetle normally infests only windthrown timber, and is usually able to attack standing trees only following a year of excessive blowdown. The Douglas -fir beetles, which build up tremendous populations in the excessive blowdown, are then forced to make mass attacks on standing trees. Heavy attacks on a tree reduce its resistance until it is completely overcome by Douglas- - fir beetles. The tree is killed by the girdling action of the Douglas - fir beetles in the cambium and by the introduction and spread of blue - stain fungus, Ceratocystis spp. , which is carried and introduced by the beetles. Many board -feet of timber may be killed before the Douglas -fir beetle population subsides. Although the origin of a Douglas -fir beetle epidemic in western Oregon depends primarily on the amount of available windthrown ma- terial, the decline of Douglas -fir beetle populations is caused by the combination of weather, host resistance, competition, predation, and z parasitism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Pine Beetle Host Selection Behavior Confirms High Resistance in Great Basin Bristlecone Pine
    Forest Ecology and Management 402 (2017) 12–20 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Mountain pine beetle host selection behavior confirms high resistance in Great Basin bristlecone pine ⇑ Erika L. Eidson a, Karen E. Mock a,b, Barbara J. Bentz c, a Wildland Resources Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA b Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA c USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Logan, UT 84321, USA article info abstract Article history: Over the last two decades, mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) populations reached epi- Received 9 February 2017 demic levels across much of western North America, including high elevations where cool temperatures Received in revised form 12 May 2017 previously limited mountain pine beetle persistence. Many high-elevation pine species are susceptible Accepted 8 June 2017 hosts and experienced high levels of mortality in recent outbreaks, but co-occurring Great Basin bristle- cone pines (Pinus longaeva) were not attacked. Using no-choice attack box experiments, we compared Great Basin bristlecone pine resistance to mountain pine beetle with that of limber pine (P. flexilis), a Keywords: well-documented mountain pine beetle host. We confined sets of mountain pine beetles onto 36 pairs Mountain pine beetle of living Great Basin bristlecone and limber pines and recorded beetle status after 48 h. To test the role Great Basin bristlecone pine Host selection of induced defenses in Great Basin bristlecone pine resistance, we then repeated the tests on 20 paired Tree resistance sections of Great Basin bristlecone and limber pines that had been recently cut, thereby removing their capacity for induced defensive reactions to an attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Bark Beetles
    Bark Beetles O & T Guide [O-#03] Carol A. Sutherland Extension and State Entomologist Cooperative Extension Service z College of Agriculture and Home Economics z October 2006 Although New Mexico bark beetle adults are In monogamous species such as the Douglas small, rarely exceeding 1/3 inch in length, they fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, the are very capable of killing even the largest female bores the initial gallery into the host host trees with a mass assault, girdling them or tree, releases pheromones attractive to her inoculating them with certain lethal pathogens. species and accepts one male as her mate. Some species routinely attack the trunks and major limbs of their host trees, other bark beetle species mine the twigs of their hosts, pruning and weakening trees and facilitating the attack of other tree pests. While many devastating species of bark beetles are associated with New Mexico conifers, other species favor broadleaf trees and can be equally damaging. Scientifically: Bark beetles belong to the insect order Coleoptera and the family Scolytidae. Adult “engraver beetle” in the genus Ips. The head is on the left; note the “scooped out” area Metamorphosis: Complete rimmed by short spines on the rear of the Mouth Parts: Chewing (larvae and adults) beetle, a common feature for members of this Pest Stages: Larvae and adults. genus. Photo: USDA Forest Service Archives, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org Typical Life Cycle: Adult bark beetles are strong fliers and are highly receptive to scents In polygamous species such as the pinyon bark produced by damaged or stressed host trees as beetle, Ips confusus, the male bores a short well as communication pheromones produced nuptial chamber into the host’s bark, releases by other members of their species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Subfamily Acaenitinae Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from Ukrainian Carpathians
    Biodiversity Data Journal 1: e1008 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.1.e1008 Taxonomic paper A review of the subfamily Acaenitinae Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from Ukrainian Carpathians Alexander Varga † † I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine Corresponding author: Alexander Varga ([email protected]) Academic editor: Francisco Hita Garcia Received: 06 Oct 2013 | Accepted: 08 Dec 2013 | Published: 10 Dec 2013 Citation: Varga A (2013) A review of the subfamily Acaenitinae Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from Ukrainian Carpathians. Biodiversity Data Journal 1: e1008. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.1.e1008 Abstract Ichneumonid wasps of the subfamily Acaenitinae Förster, 1869 are reviewed for the first time from the Ukrainian Carpathians. Two species, Coleocentrus exareolatus Kriechbaumer, 1894 and C. heteropus Thomson, 1894 are new records for Ukraine. Arotes annulicornis Kriechbaumer, 1894 is considered to be a junior synonym of A. albicinctus Gravenhorst, 1829 (syn. nov.). A key to species of Coleocentrus of the Carpathians is provided. Keywords Parasitoids, Ichneumonidae, Acaenitinae, Ukraine, new records, new synonymy Introduction The subfamily Acaenitinae Förster, 1869 worldwide includes about 344 species placed in 27 genera, 8 genera and 42 species of which are found in the Western Palaearctic (Yu et al. 2012). © Varga A. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY"# $hich permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. & Varga A Rather little is known of the biology of acaenitines. Some Acaenitini are koinobiont endoparasitoids (Shaw and Wahl 1989, Zwakhals 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Spruce Beetle
    QUICK GUIDE SERIES FM 2014-1 Spruce Beetle An Agent of Subalpine Change The spruce beetle is a native species in Colorado’s spruce forest ecosystem. Endemic populations are always present, and epidemics are a natural part of the changing forest. There usually are long intervals between such events as insect and disease epidemics and wildfires, giving spruce forests time to regenerate. Prior to their occurrence, the potential impacts of these natural disturbances can be reduced through proactive forest management. The spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) is responsible for the death of more spruce trees in North America than any other natural agent. Spruce beetle populations range from Alaska and Newfoundland to as far south as Arizona and New Mexico. The subalpine Engelmann spruce is the primary host tree, but the beetles will infest any Figure 1. Engelmann spruce trees infested spruce tree species within their geographical range, including blue spruce. In with spruce beetles on Spring Creek Pass. Colorado, the beetles are most commonly observed in high-elevation spruce Photo: William M. Ciesla forests above 9,000 feet. At endemic or low population levels, spruce beetles generally infest only downed trees. However, as spruce beetle population levels in downed trees increase, usually following an avalanche or windthrow event – a high-wind event that topples trees over a large area – the beetles also will infest live standing trees. Spruce beetles prefer large (16 inches in diameter or greater), mature and over- mature spruce trees in slow-growing, spruce-dominated stands. However, at epidemic levels, or when large-scale, rapid population increases occur, spruce beetles may attack trees as small as 3 inches in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Idaho Forest Health Highlights
    Idaho’s Forest Resources Idaho has over 21 million acres of forest land, from the Canadian border in the north, to the Great Basin in the south. Elevations range from less than 1,000 feet along the Clearwater River valley to over 12,000 feet in the Lost River Range of southern Idaho. The mixed conifer forests in the Panhandle area can be moist forest types that include tree species found on the Pacific Coast such as western hemlock, Pacific yew, and western redcedar. Southern Idaho forests are generally drier, and ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir are most common. Lodgepole pine, Engelmann spruce, whitebark pine and subalpine fir occur at higher elevations throughout the state. A Diverse State The Salmon River Valley generally divides the moister mixed conifer forests of the Panhandle region from the drier forests of southern Idaho. Much of southern Idaho is rangeland with scattered juniper- dominated woodlands typical of the Great Basin. The highest mountain peaks also occur in southern Idaho. Most of the com- mercial forest land is found in the north, and Douglas-fir, grand fir, western larch, lodgepole pine and western redcedar are valuable timber species. Idaho’s forests are important for many reasons. Forests are home to wildlife, provide watersheds for drinking water, and protect streams that are habitat for many species of fish, including salmon, steelhead and bull trout. Forests are also important for recreation, and Idaho has over 4.5 million acres of wilderness. Idaho’s forests are renewable, and are an important resource for the forest products industry. Maintaining healthy for- ests is crucial to protect all the things that they provide.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera Identifying the Beetles
    6/17/2020 Coleoptera Identifying the Beetles Who we are: Matt Hamblin [email protected] Graduate of Kansas State University in Manhattan, KS. Bachelors of Science in Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Minor in Entomology Began M.S. in Entomology Fall 2018 focusing on Entomology Education Who we are: Jacqueline Maille [email protected] Graduate of Kansas State University in Manhattan, KS with M.S. in Entomology. Austin Peay State University in Clarksville, TN with a Bachelors of Science in Biology, Minor Chemistry Began Ph.D. iin Entomology with KSU and USDA-SPIERU in Spring 2020 Focusing on Stored Product Pest Sensory Systems and Management 1 6/17/2020 Who we are: Isaac Fox [email protected] 2016 Kansas 4-H Entomology Award Winner Pest Scout at Arnold’s Greenhouse Distribution, Abundance and Diversity Global distribution Beetles account for ~25% of all life forms ~390,000 species worldwide What distinguishes a beetle? 1. Hard forewings called elytra 2. Mandibles move horizontally 3. Antennae with usually 11 or less segments exceptions (Cerambycidae Rhipiceridae) 4. Holometabolous 2 6/17/2020 Anatomy Taxonomically Important Features Amount of tarsi Tarsal spurs/ spines Antennae placement and features Elytra features Eyes Body Form Antennae Forms Filiform = thread-like Moniliform = beaded Serrate = sawtoothed Setaceous = bristle-like Lamellate = nested plates Pectinate = comb-like Plumose = long hairs Clavate = gradually clubbed Capitate = abruptly clubbed Aristate = pouch-like with one lateral bristle Nicrophilus americanus Silphidae, American Burying Beetle Counties with protected critical habitats: Montgomery, Elk, Chautauqua, and Wilson Red-tipped antennae, red pronotum The ecological services section, Kansas department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism 3 6/17/2020 Suborders Adephaga vs Polyphaga Families ~176 described families in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key to the Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)
    Identification key to the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Gavin Broad Dept. of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Notes on the key, February 2011 This key to ichneumonid subfamilies should be regarded as a test version and feedback will be much appreciated (emails to [email protected]). Many of the illustrations are provisional and more characters need to be illustrated, which is a work in progress. Many of the scanning electron micrographs were taken by Sondra Ward for Ian Gauld’s series of volumes on the Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica. Many of the line drawings are by Mike Fitton. I am grateful to Pelle Magnusson for the photographs of Brachycyrtus ornatus and for his suggestion as to where to include this subfamily in the key. Other illustrations are my own work. Morphological terminology mostly follows Fitton et al. (1988). A comprehensively illustrated list of morphological terms employed here is in development. In lateral views, the anterior (head) end of the wasp is to the left and in dorsal or ventral images, the anterior (head) end is uppermost. There are a few exceptions (indicated in figure legends) and these will rectified soon. Identifying ichneumonids Identifying ichneumonids can be a daunting process, with about 2,400 species in Britain and Ireland. These are currently classified into 32 subfamilies (there are a few more extralimitally). Rather few of these subfamilies are reconisable on the basis of simple morphological character states, rather, they tend to be reconisable on combinations of characters that occur convergently and in different permutations across various groups of ichneumonids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant Volatiles for Herbivores: a Bypass-Trophic Signal
    Inhibition of Predator Attraction to Kairomones by Non- Host Plant Volatiles for Herbivores: A Bypass-Trophic Signal Qing-He Zhang¤, Fredrik Schlyter* Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden Abstract Background: Insect predators and parasitoids exploit attractive chemical signals from lower trophic levels as kairomones to locate their herbivore prey and hosts. We hypothesized that specific chemical cues from prey non-hosts and non-habitats, which are not part of the trophic chain, are also recognized by predators and would inhibit attraction to the host/prey kairomone signals. To test our hypothesis, we studied the olfactory physiology and behavior of a predaceous beetle, Thanasimus formicarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Cleridae), in relation to specific angiosperm plant volatiles, which are non-host volatiles (NHV) for its conifer-feeding bark beetle prey. Methodology/Principal Findings: Olfactory detection in the clerid was confirmed by gas chromatography coupled to electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) for a subset of NHV components. Among NHV, we identified two strongly antennally active molecules, 3-octanol and 1-octen-3-ol. We tested the potential inhibition of the combination of these two NHV on the walking and flight responses of the clerid to known kairomonal attractants such as synthetic mixtures of bark beetle (Ips spp.) aggregation pheromone components (cis-verbenol, ipsdienol, and E-myrcenol) combined with conifer (Picea and Pinus spp.) monoterpenes (a-pinene, terpinolene, and D3-carene). There was a strong inhibitory effect, both in the laboratory (effect size d = 23.2, walking bioassay) and in the field (d = 21.0, flight trapping). This is the first report of combining antennal detection (GC-EAD) and behavioral responses to identify semiochemical molecules that bypass the trophic system, signaling habitat information rather than food related information.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Evolution of a Bark Beetle Odorant Receptor Clade Detecting Monoterpenoids of Different Ecological Origins
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.28.424525; this version posted December 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Functional evolution of a bark beetle odorant receptor clade detecting monoterpenoids of different ecological origins Xiao-Qing Hou1, Jothi Kumar Yuvaraj1, Rebecca E. Roberts1, C. Rikard Unelius2, Christer Löfstedt1, Martin N. Andersson1* 1Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden 2 Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden *Corresponding author: Martin N. Andersson Department of Biology, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62 Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Phone: +46-(0)462229344 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.28.424525; this version posted December 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Insects detect odors using an array of odorant receptors (ORs), which may expand through gene duplication. How specificities evolve and new functions arise in related ORs within a species remain poorly investigated. We addressed this question by functionally characterizing ORs from the Eurasian spruce bark beetle Ips typographus, in which antennal detection and behavioral responses to pheromones, volatiles from host and non-host trees, and fungal symbionts are well described.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichneumonid Wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in the to Scale Caterpillar (Lepidoptera) [1]
    Central JSM Anatomy & Physiology Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Article *Corresponding author Bui Tuan Viet, Institute of Ecology an Biological Resources, Vietnam Acedemy of Science and Ichneumonid Wasps Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam, Email: (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Submitted: 11 November 2016 Accepted: 21 February 2017 Published: 23 February 2017 Parasitizee a Pupae of the Rice Copyright © 2017 Viet Insect Pests (Lepidoptera) in OPEN ACCESS Keywords the Hanoi Area • Hymenoptera • Ichneumonidae Bui Tuan Viet* • Lepidoptera Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam Abstract During the years 1980-1989,The surveys of pupa of the rice insect pests (Lepidoptera) in the rice field crops from the Hanoi area identified showed that 12 species of the rice insect pests, which were separated into three different groups: I- Group (Stem bore) including Scirpophaga incertulas, Chilo suppressalis, Sesamia inferens; II-Group (Leaf-folder) including Parnara guttata, Parnara mathias, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Brachmia sp, Naranga aenescens; III-Group (Bite ears) including Mythimna separata, Mythimna loryei, Mythimna venalba, Spodoptera litura . From these organisms, which 15 of parasitoid species were found, those species belonging to 5 families in of the order Hymenoptera (Ichneumonidae, Chalcididae, Eulophidae, Elasmidae, Pteromalidae). Nine of these, in which there were 9 of were ichneumonid wasp species: Xanthopimpla flavolineata, Goryphus basilaris, Xanthopimpla punctata, Itoplectis naranyae, Coccygomimus nipponicus, Coccygomimus aethiops, Phaeogenes sp., Atanyjoppa akonis, Triptognatus sp. We discuss the general biology, habitat preferences, and host association of the knowledge of three of these parasitoids, (Xanthopimpla flavolineata, Phaeogenes sp., and Goryphus basilaris). Including general biology, habitat preferences and host association were indicated and discussed.
    [Show full text]