Handbuch Für Urban Gardening

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Handbuch Für Urban Gardening Handbuch für Urban Gardening Co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union 1 Partner Amadora Innovation BUPNET GmbH Einurd XWHY / Agency of Understanding KMOP | Athens KMOP | Skopje Autorin Dimaka Dafni, KMOP, Greece Co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. 2 Inhalt Vorwort Allgemein....................................................................................................................5 Gliederung des Handbuches.........................................................................................6 1. Was ist Urban Gardening?..........................................................................................8 Die Dimensionen von Urban Gardening..................................................................10 a. Entwicklung lokaler Wirtschaftskreisläufe................................................10 b. Soziale & kulturelle Inklusion............................................................................11 c. Effekte für die psychische Gesundheit..........................................................11 d. Auswirkungen und Effekte auf den Klimawandel.....................................13 2. Merkmale und Praxis von Urban Gardening....................................................15 2.1 Praktische Schritte zum Anlegen eines urbanen Gartens.............................17 a. Einen Platz auswählen..........................................................................................17 b. Best Practice aus Litauen: Städtischer Gemeinschaftsgarten.................20 2.2 Samen und Pflanzen besorgen...........................................................................22 2.3 Wie gesät wird.........................................................................................................24 2.4 Gartenwerkzeuge....................................................................................................26 2.5 Einen Garten auf einem Dach anlegen............................................................30 3. Untersuchung des europäischen Projekts “Urban Gardening”...................34 3.1 Allgemeines.................................................................................................................34 3.2 Die Wissenslücke.....................................................................................................35 3.3 Ergebnis der Recherche........................................................................................35 4. Rechtliche und finanzielle Rahmenbedingungen für die Umsetzung von Urband Garding in der EU................................................................................................41 4.1 Rechtlicher Rahmen in Europa...............................................................................41 4.2 Finanzinstrumente.....................................................................................................41 5. Handlungsempfehlungen..........................................................................................43 Quellenangaben...................................................................................................................47 Annex I. National Research.............................................................................................50 Germany.............................................................................................................................50 Greece................................................................................................................................56 3 Iceland................................................................................................................................62 Lithuania.............................................................................................................................67 North Macedonia.............................................................................................................73 Portugal...............................................................................................................................79 Transnational Report......................................................................................................84 Policy Recommendations................................................................................................86 Annex II. The second part of Research......................................................................88 Annex III CASE STUDIES & BEST PRACTICES........................................................99 Case Study: Greece – KIPOS3 Project (Thessaloniki).......................................102 Case Study: Iceland – Seljagarðar (Urban garden in Reykjavík).....................105 Case Study: Lithuania – Idėjų Lysvė Pilaitėje (Ideas Garden - Vilnius)..........107 Case Study: North Macedonia – “First Urban Garden in the City of Skopje”.............110 Case Study: Portugal – «Horta à porta» (Biological Gardens of the Porto Region).................................................................111 Best Practices.....................................................................................................................114 Germany.............................................................................................................................114 Greece................................................................................................................................115 Iceland.................................................................................................................................116 North Macedonia..............................................................................................................118 Portugal..............................................................................................................................120 4 1. Vorwort Allgemein In einer modernen und sich schnell verändernden Welt, in der Informa- tionen und Waren keine Grenzen Ziele mehr kennen, scheinen Menschen Der Hauptzweck dieses Handbuchs und Gesellschaften nach Möglich- ist es, einen umfassenden keiten zu suchen, einen Teil ihrer Überblick zu geben, so dass es als Zeit, die manchmal kostenlos und Nachschlagewerk dienen kann, sowohl manchmal für den Lebensunterhalt für junge Leute, die nicht mit Urban zur Verfügung steht, zurückzuge- Gardening vertraut sind, als auch für winnen. Darüber hinaus schaffen diejenigen, die daran interessiert sein die zunehmende Verstädterung könnten, sich systematischer damit zu und die starke Konzentration der beschäftigen. Bevölkerung in großen urbanen Zentren neue Bedürfnisse und Lebensbedingungen, die letztlich direkte oder langfristige Auswirkungen auf den Einzelnen und die Gesellschaft als Ganzes haben. In einem solchen Kon- text entstand die Idee des Urban Gardening als eine zusätzliche Möglichkeit, verfügbare Ressourcen wie städtische Flächen und Zeit zu kombinieren mit Bedürfnissen wie Lebensunterhalt, Beschäftigung, Begegnung, Unterhaltung und Kreativität. Organisationen aus 6 europäischen Ländern haben im Rahmen des Projekts “URBAN - Engaging youth with Urban Gardening Activities” zusammengear- beitet, um diesen Leitfaden zu entwerfen, der sich an Einzelpersonen oder Gruppen richtet, die einen städtischen Garten beliebiger Größe oder Form an- legen möchten. Aus diesem Grund ist der Leitfaden in zwei Abschnitte unter- teilt, damit sich die Lesenden ein vollständiges und umfassendes Bild sowohl von den Methoden als auch von den Gründen für das Anlegen eines urbanen Gartens machen können und durch eine Umfrage unter Jugendlichen und Ur- ban-Gardening-Experten erfahren, was in anderen Ländern geschieht. 5 Gliederung des Handbuches Das erste Kapitel des Handbuchs beginnt damit, was ein urbaner Garten ist, und stellt einen theoretischen Ansatz für die Definition sowie die Vorteile solcher Gärten für unser tägliches Leben auf persönlicher und sozialer Ebene vor. Das zweite Kapitel vermittelt den grundlegenden Hintergrund in Bezug auf das Wissen, das man haben muss, um einen städtischen Garten zu betreiben, sowohl als Einzelperson als auch in der Gemeinschaft, um Obst und Gemüse anzubauen. Das dritte Kapitel gibt einen Teil der Untersuchungen wieder, die in den Partnerländern des Projekts mit Zielgruppen von jungen Menschen und Expert*innen für urbane Gärten durchgeführt wurden, um zusätzliches Wissen über die Elemente zu gewinnen, die den theoretischen Rahmen unseres Handbuchs bilden. Das vierte Kapitel führt die Säulen der europäischen Gesetzgebung in Bezug auf die Schaffung eines urbanen Gartens an, sowie einige wichtige Informationen zur Finanzierung eines solchen Projekts, hauptsächlich in Zusammenarbeit mit den Institutionen des Landes. Das letzte Kapitel fasst Ideen und Handlungsempfehlungen aller Partnerorga- nisationen zusammen, die an der Entstehung dieses Handbuchs mitgewirkt haben, um die bestehenden Praktiken zu verbessern, die für die Anlage eines urbanen Gartens genutzt werden können. Interessant sind auch die Anhänge dieses Handbuchs, die den Rest der Unter- suchungen sowie verschiedene Fallstudien und Best Practices präsentieren, um den Lesenden einen Überblick über die in anderen europäischen Ländern vorliegenden Daten zu geben. 6 1. 1. Teil A 7 1. Was ist Urban Gardening? Die Ernährungs- und Landwirtschaftsorganisation der Vereinten Nationen (Food and Agriculture
Recommended publications
  • Download Thessaloniki Case Study
    Ιntegration through non formal education: the case of REACT & Open Schools Contents The Mandate of MoThess in the education policy sector The Municipality of Thessaloniki’s (MoThess) Mandate - The MoThess does not have a mandate in formal education of children but the responsibility of school infrastructure and activities beyond formal schooling hours - Formal education is obligatory for children between 5-15 years of age - MoThess‟ approach in combining integration and education has three pillars: 1) Supporting children in accessing education 2) Supporting children and adults with non formal education needs 3) Integrating non-formal education activities to priorities aiming to bolster city resilience including community building 4) Designing complementary non-formal education activities directed to the host community and refugees (social cohesion) Presentation of the policy actions in formal education The MoE is implementing a formal education programme which is aimed at children who live in camps or host structures in Greece and separates them according to their accommodation type and previous attendance at school. The goal for this year is the integration of refugee children into the Greek formal education system. Every child has the right to have access to the formal education. Details of the D.Y.E.P. The program is referring to: Refugee children 4-15 years old , The establishment of Reception Structures for the Education of Refugees (DYEP) in public schools of the primary and elementary formal education * and the creation of the reception classes in the primary and secondary school (minimum of 9 students per school necessary to set up reception classes) The creation of a kindergarten in the camp * formal education is 9 years Details of the D.Y.E.P.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Series B- 5922/31.12.2018
    69941 GREEK GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Series B- 5922/31.12.2018 TRUE COPY 69941 OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Greek Government Gazette December 31st 2018 SERIES B Issue No. 5922 Β' 464/19-4-2010). DECISIONS 9. The provisions of ministerial decision “Natural Gas Dec. No 1314/2018 Licensing Regulation” ref. no. 178065 (Government Gazette Β' 3430/17.08.2018, hereinafter referred to as For the granting of a Natural Gas Distribution “Licensing Regulation”). License to the company under the trade name 10. The Tariffs Regulation for the Main Distribution “Gas Distribution Company Thessaloniki- Activity of distribution networks in Attica, Thessaloniki, Thessaly S.A.” and the distinctive title “EDA Thessaly and other Greece (Government Gazette Β' THESS”. 3067/26.09.2016) (hereinafter referred to as “Tariffs Regulation”). THE REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR ENERGY 11. The RAE's Decision No 346/2016 on the Approval Taking into consideration the following: of the Tariff for the Charge of the Main Natural Gas 1. The provisions of Law 4001/2011 “For the Distribution Activity on Thessaloniki distribution network operation of the Energy Markets of Electricity and (Government Gazette Β' 3490/31.10.2016). Natural Gas, for Research, Production and transmission 12. The RAE's Decision No 347/2016 on the Approval networks of Hydrocarbons and other arrangements” of the Tariff for the Charge of the Main Natural Gas (Government Gazette A’179/22.08.2011), as amended Distribution Activity on Thessaly distribution network and in force (hereinafter referred to as “the Law”), and (Government Gazette Β'3537/03.11.2016). especially articles 13 and 80C thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure and Cancer Risk
    Dep. of Chemical Engineering School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki Chemical and Radiological Risk in the Indoor Environment (CheRRIE) Exposure and risk assessment of chemical compounds Prof. Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Director of Environmental Engineering Laboratory (EnvE-Lab) Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - 54124, Greece CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 1 Dep. of Chemical Engineering School of Engineering Health impact assessment Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki Interaction at the level of metabolism (inhibition) Xylene Toluene Ethylbenzene Benzene Liver (metabolism) Leukemia Probabilitydensity Acetaldehyde Formaldehyde Nasopharyngeal Cancer Cumulative risk Larynx Cancer CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 2 1 Dep. of Chemical Engineering Methodology – exposure and School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki intake assessment Personal exposure is equal to the average concentration of a pollutant that a person is exposed to over a given period of time, e.g. 1 day, 1 month or 1 year. If over the given period of time, T, the person passes through n locations, spending a fraction fn of the period T in location n where the concentration of the pollutant under consideration is Cn, then the personal exposure for this period T, represented by the concentration CT CT fn Cn n based on the time-weight contribution of the activities, the level of intensity and the corresponding inhalation rate, we derived adjustment factors for each location type. As a result, average exposure is given by the following formula, where inh is the inhalation adjustment factor for each type of microenvironment encountered in the calculations: CT f n C n inh n 3 Daily intake I is estimated from the following formula, where inhr is the inhalation rate (m /h) for each type of microenvironment encountered in the calculations and tn is the time of residence in the specific microenvironment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multicultural Citizenship Education Program Through a Virtual Learning Environment Platform: a Greek Study Under the EU ISOTIS Project
    International Journal of Learning and Development ISSN 2164-4063 2020, Vol. 10, No. 1 A Multicultural Citizenship Education Program Through a Virtual Learning Environment Platform: A Greek Study Under the EU ISOTIS Project Konstantinos N. Vasileiadis PhD (Corresponding author) Head-teacher, 16th Primary School of Evosmos, Greece E-mail: [email protected] Evdoxia D. Kompiadou, PhD candidate Kindergarten teacher, 14th Kindergarten of Sykies, Thessaloniki, Greece E-mail: [email protected] Konstantinos A. Tsioumis, Professor School of Philosophy and Education, Aristotle University Thessaloniki Thessaloniki, Greece E-mail: [email protected] Konstantinos Petrogiannis, Professor School of Humanities, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 15, 2019 Accepted: January 14, 2020 Published: February 5, 2020 doi:10.5296/ijld.v10i1.16041 URL: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v10i1.16041 52 http://ijld.macrothink.org International Journal of Learning and Development ISSN 2164-4063 2020, Vol. 10, No. 1 Abstract The article presents the activities taken place to design and implement activities that meet the criteria, aims and goals of ISOTIS project that aims to contribute to effective policy and practice development at different system levels in order to effectively combat early arising and persisting educational inequalities. We focus on the procedures and theoretical framework that the Greek team, as partner of ISOTIS project adopted to support diverse families both linguistically and culturally, to create effective and inclusive curricula and moreover to develop educational policy to combat educational inequalities. In this paper we introduce the criteria for selecting the sites according to the demographic and their pedagogical characteristics, the teacher’s experience, the children’s needs and the main issues, challenges and arguments for the co-design phase and the main principles and shared ideas according to ISOTIS criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Tel.: +30 2310 764 023 E-Mail: [email protected] Social Enterprises in Combating Poverty
    Project Partners Thessaloniki Central Market S.A. 7th km Thessaloniki - Athens motorway, N. Menemeni ❝ Thessaloniki GR-54628, Greece Supporting Tel.: +30 2310 764 023 e-mail: [email protected] Social Enterprises https://www.socialplate.eu in combating poverty https://foodangels.socialplate.eu SocialPlate ( plate_social) and social exclusion @ ❞ The INTERREG V-A “Greece-Bulgaria 2014-2020” Cooperation Programme is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund and national funds from the countries participating in it. PROJECT RESULTS THE PROJECT The Project: ”Supporting Social Enterprises in combating poverty and social exclusion” (Αcronym: ”SOCIAL PLATE”) is implemented in the framework of the INTERREG V-A Greece - Bulgaria 2014-2020 programme, Priority Axis: 4. An “Social Food Support Civil Non-profit Partnership” inter-border area with no exclusions, Thematic goal: 09 - Combating poverty, discrimination and social exclusion, Investment Priority: 9c. Providing support to social enterprises. The project is co-funded by the European Union (85%) and National Funds In the frame of the project the “Social Food Support Civil Non-profit Partnership” was established from Thessaloniki Central (15%) and its duration is 24 months. The partners implementing the project from Greece are Thessaloniki Central Market Market S.A. and TECHNOPOLIS - International Education Institute. “Social Food Support”, in cooperation with the organic S.A. as lead partner and TECHNOPOLIS - International Education Institute. The partners implementing the project from waste and packaging management office, operates in Thessaloniki Central Market, with main goals the reduction of food Bulgaria are Municipality of Borino and Active Youths NGO. waste, the combat of malnutrition, and recycling. The main action priority of the project addresses the compat of poverty and social exclusion and the support of social stakeholders with the same goals.
    [Show full text]
  • European Cities on the Front Line
    European Cities on the Front Line New and emerging governance models for migrant inclusion EUROPE Co-funded by the European Union The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in the meeting of operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Migration Policy Institute Europe, established in Brussels in 2011, is a nonprofit, independent research institute that aims to provide a better understanding of migration in Europe and thus promote effective policymaking. MPI Europe provides authoritative research and practical policy design to governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders who seek more effective management of immigration, immigrant integration, and asylum systems as well as successful outcomes for newcomers, families of immigrant background, and receiving communities throughout Europe. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Commission. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Publisher: International Organization for Migration Publisher: Migration Policy Institute Europe Mission in Italy with Coordinating Role for the Mediterranean Residence Palace, 155 Rue de la Loi Casale Strozzi Superiore 3rd Floor Via L.G.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Cities of Greece
    SNo City Census 1991 Census 2001 Census 2011 Rank Region 1 Athens 772,072 745,514 664,046 1 Attica 2 Thessaloniki 383,967 363,987 315,196 2 Central Macedonia 3 Patras 152,570 160,400 168,034 3 West Greece 4 Piraeus 182,671 175,697 163,688 4 Attica 5 Larissa 112,777 124,394 144,651 5 Thessaly 6 Heraklion 115,270 130,914 140,730 6 Crete 7 Peristeri 137,288 137,918 139,981 7 Attica 8 Kallithea 114,233 109,609 100,641 8 Attica 9 Acharnes 61,052 75,329 99,346 9 Attica 10 Kalamaria 80,698 87,255 91,279 10 Central Macedonia 11 Nikaia 87,597 93,086 89,380 11 Attica 12 Glyfada 63,306 80,409 87,305 12 Attica 13 Volos 77,192 82,439 86,046 13 Thessaly 14 Ilio 78,326 80,859 84,793 14 Attica 15 Ilioupoli 75,037 75,904 78,153 15 Attica 16 Keratsini 71,982 76,102 77,077 16 Attica 17 Evosmos 28,821 52,624 74,686 17 Central Macedonia 18 Chalandri 66,285 71,684 74,192 18 Attica 19 Nea Smyrni 69,749 73,986 73,076 19 Attica 20 Marousi 64,092 69,470 72,333 20 Attica 21 Agios Dimitrios 57,574 65,173 71,294 21 Attica 22 Zografou 80,492 76,115 71,026 22 Attica 23 Egaleo 78,563 74,046 69,946 23 Attica 24 Nea Ionia 60,635 66,017 67,134 24 Attica 25 Ioannina 56,699 61,629 65,574 25 Epirus 26 Palaio Faliro 61,371 64,759 64,021 26 Attica 27 Korydallos 63,184 67,456 63,445 27 Attica 28 Trikala 45,835 48,686 61,653 28 Thessaly 29 Vyronas 58,523 61,102 61,308 29 Attica 30 Agia Paraskevi 47,463 56,836 59,704 30 Attica 31 Galatsi 57,230 58,042 59,345 31 Attica 32 Chalcis 51,646 53,584 59,125 32 Central Greece 33 Petroupoli 38,278 48,327 58,979 33 Attica 34 Serres 50,017
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program the Politics of Space and the Humanities 15-17 December 2017
    3 Conference Program The Politics of Space and the Humanities 15-17 December 2017 Friday 15 December 2017 CONFERENCE OPENING Venue: Ceremony Hall – Faculty of Philosophy – Old Building 10:00-10:20 – Conference Opening Addresses 10:20-10:30 – Music Interlude 10:30-11:30 – 1st KEYNOTE ADDRESS Yiorgos Kalogeras (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece), “Between the Old and the New World: Parallel Systems of Justice and the ‘New’ Immigrants.” Chair: Artemis Zenetou (Executive Director, Fulbright Foundation Greece) **** CONFERENCE CONTINUING Venue: Congress Center Nikolaos Germanos HELEXPO KIOSK 8 (2nd Floor) 9:00-19:00 Conference Registration 12:00-12:30 Welcome Coffee 4 12:30-14:15 – PARALLEL SESSIONS Rooms A, B, C, D (2nd Floor) Room E (1st Floor) PANEL 1 – Room B Environmental Spaces Chair: Sofia Emmanouilidou (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 1. Eleftheria Tsirakoglou (Independent Researcher), “‘Green Thoughts in a Green Shade’: Approaches to Space in Louisa May Alcott’s Works.” 2. Sezgin Toska (İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University), “Media as a Device of Justification of Environmental Crime.” 3. Luz González-Rodríguez (University of La Laguna, Tenerife), “Porous Bodies in Mumbai: An Analysis of the Urban Landscape in Rohinton Mistry’s Work.” PANEL 2 – Room A Dystopian and Utopian Spaces Chair: Filio Chasioti (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 1. Maxim Shadurski (Siedlce University Poland), “Utopia and Landscape: The Politics of Spatial Imaginaries.” 2. Cecilia Cruccolini (University of Bologna), “Beyond the Walls: Diasporic Subjects and New Configurations of Space in Contemporary English Literary Dystopias.” 3. Lu Gan (University of Bayreuth), “The Dystopian Imagination of Asia in Contemporary American Speculative Fiction.” 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplier Event Thessaloniki, Greece 25-26 May 2018
    Project Number: 2016-1-FR01-KA201-024133 “All children different and all children equal at school” - Multiplier Event Thessaloniki, Greece 25-26 May 2018 List of participants Address of the Name and Surname E-mail address Sending Organisation sending organisation 1. Konstantinos Kourtidis [email protected] Student AUTH Thessaloniki 2. Louka Marianna [email protected] Teacher, Secondary Education, Music School of Veria City of Veria 3. Strouni Chrysoula [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Secondary Education Thessaloniki 4. Ioakeim Navrozidis [email protected] Teacher Thessaloniki 5. Styliani Lytsiousi [email protected] Kindergarden teacher Thessaloniki 6. Mazaraki Aggeliki [email protected] Teacher, primary school Thessaloniki 7. Theodoropoulou Olympia [email protected] Teacher, primary school Thessaloniki 8. Klinaki Maria [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Second. education Thessaloniki 9. Kirikou Konstantina [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Second. Education, 2nd General Lyceum of Sykies Thessaloniki 10. Soilemezi Parthenopi [email protected] Refugee Education Coordinator, Diavata accommodation camp Thessaloniki 11. Katerina Pranentsi [email protected] Centre for Greek Language Kalamari, Thessaloniki 12. Dimitrios Papadopoulos [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Second. Education,2nd General Lyceum, Chortiatis Chortiatis 13. Maria Branioti [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Secondary Education Thessaloniki 14. Voulgaridou Maria [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Second. Education Thessaloniki 15. Marisa Dekastro [email protected] Author of children’s books Athens 16. Panos Christodoulou [email protected] Network for Children’s Rights Athens 17. Cloptsidou Pagona [email protected] Student of Philology Thessaloniki 18. Ioanna Kousathana [email protected] Student of Philology Thessaloniki 19. Christos Vardas [email protected] Teacher of Philology, Second.
    [Show full text]
  • Register 2018
    Register (approved by Ministry of Rural Development and Food of the Hellenic Republic) of exporters of fresh kiwi fruits of Greece for export period 2018/2019, in accordance with the article 2 of the 24 th November 2008: “Protocol of phytosanitary requirements for the export of kiwi fruit from the Hellenic Republic to China between the Ministry of Rural Development and Food of the Hellenic Republic and the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China”. 01. AC "NESTOS" A) “AC "NESTOS"” I) The exporter of fresh kiwi fruits, produced in certain regional units of Greece and are for export to the People’s Republic of China (China) during the export period 2018/2019. Name of the Headquarters Name and surname, Phone, Fax and Email exporting with full postal full address and company address Number of Identity Tax Registration Card of the person Number. responsible on phytosanitary issues AC "NESTOS" 5TH KILOMETER KARKATZALOS Τel. +302591062130 VAT EL CHRYSOUPOLIS- ANASTASIOS, 6979223209 096067392 KERAMOTIS, ΑΕ 894204, Fax. +302591061026 64200, PERNI KAVALAS, E-mail. KAVALA, GREECE [email protected] GREECE [email protected] ΙΙ ) The packing house, storage facility and the cold treatment facility of fresh kiwi fruits, produced in certain regional units of Greece and are for export to the People’s Republic of China (China) during the export period 2018/2019. Name of the Headquarters Name and surname, Phone, Fax and Email exporting with full postal full address and Number company address of Identity Card of the Tax Registration person Number. responsible on phytosanitary issues 1 Packing house: 5TH KILOMETER KARKATZALOS Τel.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Measurements of Chemical Compounds
    Dep. of Chemical Engineering School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki Chemical and Radiological Risk in the Indoor Environment (CheRRIE) In situ measurements of chemical compounds Prof. Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Director of Environmental Engineering Laboratory (EnvE-Lab) Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - 54124, Greece CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 1 Dep. of Chemical Engineering Location of the 50 residential School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki sites CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 2 1 Dep. of Chemical Engineering Sampling and analysis School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki BTEX Carbonyls CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 3 Dep. of Chemical Engineering Excluding outdoor BTEX School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki contribution CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 4 2 Dep. of Chemical Engineering Indoor concentrations School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki 30 5%-95% Median ) 3 25 Mean g/m μ 20 15 10 5 Indoor concentration ( 0 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde BTEX Aldehydes CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 5 Dep. of Chemical Engineering BTEX concentrations School of Engineering Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki 35 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes 30 25 ) 3 g/m 20 μ 15 10 Concentration ( 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Kalamaria Kentro Ano ToumpaStauroupoli Polihni Evosmos AmpelokhpoiNeapoli Sykies TriandriaPylaia Peuka Panorama Thermi CheRRIE Progress meeting February 27, 2015 Thessaloniki, GR 6 3 Dep.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee and Migrant Child Population Outside Accommodation Sites in Thessaloniki Thessaloniki, Greece February 2017
    Refugee and Migrant Child Population outside Accommodation sites in Thessaloniki Thessaloniki, Greece February 2017 For more information on this profile please contact: REACH Initiative, [email protected] Refugee and Migrant Child Population outside Accommodation sites in Thessaloniki Thessaloniki, Greece February 2017 Demographics of the overall Refugee and Migrant Population in Thessaloniki Demographics Assessed population 1,171 Number of children 642* Average length of 6 stay (months) 67+14+8+6+4 Proportion of Apartments: 67%** population hosted in Hotels: 14% each type of site UASC Shelters: 8% Independent Initiative: 6% NGO Shelter: 4% 86+9+3+2+1 Primary languages Arabic: 86% spoken in sites Kurmanji: 9% Farsi: 3% Urdu: 2% English: 1% Children Status Accompanied UASC Number of children 536 (83%) 106 (17%) Gender of children 51% Male 49% Female 98% Male 2% Female Ages of children 0-4 years: 41% 5-11 years: 3% 5-11 years: 41% 12-14 years: 8% 12-14 years: 10% 15-17 years: 87% 15-17 years: 8% Data not available: 3% Countries of origin of Syria: 79% Syria: 41% children Iraq: 6% Afghanistan: 28% Nigeria: 2% Pakistan: 21% Data not available: 13% Albania: 3% Iran: 3% Iraq: 2% Morocco: 2% *This figure also includes children in neighbourhoods where less than 20 children were identified and are, as such, not included in the neighbourhood-level breakdown of findings.The number of children assessed in unknown districts is much higher than the number of children in assessed districts where Lebanese, Palestinian or Bangladeshi children are hosted, hence the overall data reflects the larger overall population of Nigerian children in assessed locations.
    [Show full text]