Mutasim's March Through in A. D. 838 Author(s): J. B. Bury Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 29 (1909), pp. 120-129 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/624648 . Accessed: 12/01/2015 03:14

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUTASIM'S MARCH THROUGH CAPPADOCIA IN A.D. 838.

IN the warfare between the Eastern Empire and the in the ninth century, one of the most famous passages is the expedition of Mutasim, which was signalised by the siege and capture of Amorion, in A.D. 838. The best, in fact the only full, narrative of the campaign is preserved in the Chronicle of Tabari (A. H. 223).' His account of the opening operations of the invading armies is beset with certain geographical difficulties which I propose to consider in this paper, with the help of material supplied in the writings of Professor Ramsay, and in the hope that he may be able to throw further light on the subject. The Caliph 2 invaded Asia Minor with three armies. His objective was in the first instance Ancyra. His general, Afshin, in command of what we may call the Eastern army, crossed the Taurus by the pass of IHadath (Adata),3 and presumably his route was by Arabissos, Tzamandos, and Sebastea.4 The two divisions of the Western army, under the Caliph himself and Ashnas, started from and crossed by the . The plan was that the armies should meet in the neighbourhood of Ancyra, and as the Saracens were well acquainted with the roads of central Asia Minor, they were able to calculate the distances and arrange the times of starting for the Eastern and Western armies respectively,5 so that they could hope to arrive at the same time at Ancyra, if nothing untoward occurred. Ashnas set out from Cilicia on June 19, and was directed to await the arrival of the Caliph's army at Lulon, the great fortress which commanded

1 De Goeje, iii. 1236 sqq. I have used the must be inferred from the fact that his battle Russian r translation of Vasil'ev, Vizantiia i with the army of Theophilus was fought in the Araby, i. Prilozhenie, 30 sqq. and my refer- neighbourhood of Dazimon (Tokat). Vasil'ev ences are to it. So far as I know, Vasil'ev is probably right in supposing (op. cit. 121) is the only modern critic who has worked up that it was part of the plan that Afshin should the relation of Tabari. join another army, from Armenia and Melitene 2 He left Samarra early in April, Yakubi, in (perhaps -rs E 'ApAevL'wv o-pa-aris of Genesios Vas. Pril. 9 ; cp. Masudi, Golden Mcadows, ib. 67). The westward roads from Melitene and 68 de vii. 3(Barbier Meynard, 135). Armenia met at Sebastea. The fertile plain of He started from Saruja (Tabari 31) Dazimon (Kaz-ova) lay on the right (north) of Surghi. the route Sebastea - - Ancyra. 4 The most direct route to Ancyra was by Cp. Anderson's map of Asia Minor (1903). Caesarea. But that Afshin marched by Sebastea 5 Tabari, ib.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUTASIM'S MARCH THROUGH CAPPADOCIA IN A.D. 838 121 the northern approach of the Pass of Podandos or Cilician Gates.6 Lulon was at this time in the possession of the Moslems; it had been captured by a general of Mamun in the autumn of A.D. 832.7 In the meantime Mutasim himself had encamped in Western Cilicia near the river , which was the boundary between Roman and Saracen territory. For what reason he went to the Lamos is not stated, and I mention the fact only because it has a bearing on the subsequent narrative of Tabari. Mutasim set out two days after Ashnas (June 21) and crossed the Taurus by the Pass of Podandos, in his footsteps.8 In a manner very common in the Arabic chronicles, Tabari, without referring to the arranged meeting at Lulon, leaps abruptly to a further stage of the march of the invaders. The two armies have again se- parated. Ashnas, evidently in advance, is at Marj-uskuf. and Mutasim in Matamir. Mutasim r sends Ashnas a letter of which the tenor, as reproduced by Tabari, is unintelligible. 'The Emperor is in front of you and B Xazianzos intends to throw his army across RC NaziaMalakopaea. the Lamos. Remain where you MATA IR are, at Marj-uskuf.' . . Now we know the general Mt Argaeus. locality of Matamir, a name which Andabalis. frequently occurs in the Arabic Nigde. chronicles. It was a district in . southern Cappadocia, north of Tyana, marked by subterranean t strongholds, which are described (Pashmakji) by Ramsay.9 This is the mean- Lulo (Takhta Keupreu) ing of the word Matamir. The . _ road from Tyana to Soandos, by Podandos.

Sasima and traverses 20 30 40 Malakopaia, 10 t 0,.KM. this district. Now the route which, we may suppose, the Caliph would naturally have chosen, in order to reach Ancyra, would have been by Soandos (Nev Sheher), Parnassos, and 6 Lulon and al-Safsaf are names for the same of Podandos (Darb as-Salam), Afshin by the fortress as Ramsay has shown. For the identi- Pass of Hadath, and other armies by other fication of the fortress and a full description of routes. The last words must refer not to the Pass, see Ramsay, Geographical Journal, Ashnas, but to the forces from Melitene and Oct. 1903. Armenia. 7 Yakubi, in Vas. Pril. 8 ; Tabari, ib. 25. Historical 293; 356 the 8 9 Geography, (' plain Tabari says that Mutasim sent the advance. of Venasa, about Sasima and Malokopaia; guard of his own army in the steps of Ashnas, great underground residences are a special and and started himself on June 21. Masudi peculiar feature of this plain, which lies on the (ib. 68) says that Mutasim marched by the Pass direct road north from the Gates ').

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 122 J. B. BURY

Akharbuts. Thus the first part of his march would have been through the region of Matamir. As Ashnas was in advance of Mutasim, who was in Matamir, it seems to follow that Marj-uskuf must be sought north of Sasima. This place is. mentioned in a route from Podandos to Dorylaion, described by Ibn Khurdadhbah 10 and Idrisi,11 and discussed by Ramsay in his article on .12 The first stations are Podandos - al-Karm - an-Nawba- al-Kanais-Wafra-Balisa-Marj al-Uskuf.'3 Ramsay thinks that this route (in which Lulon and Tyana do not occur) corresponds, in its first part, to 'the modern horse-road from Podandos by Takhta-Keupreu and Pashmakji to Nigde,' and that thence it proceeded 'through Hassa-Keui and Nenizi (Nazianzos) to Ak-Serai (Archelais).' This view certainly seems best to suit the data. Nigde lies north of Tyana on the main road from Tyana to Sasima. But may it not be that the ninth-century road from Podandos to Sasima lay further to the east than the present horse-road, and joined the Tyana-Sasima road not at Nigde, but at Andabalis ? However this may be, we may, I suggest, identify Ibn Khurdadhbah's an-Nawba with Andabalis. As Sasima (Hassa-Keui) could not well be omitted in the itinerary, it is an obvious conjecture that it should be sought in the next station al-Kanais ('the churches ').14 This place is described by Ibn Khurdadhbah 'on the right of Kawkab.' It seems possible that Kawkab means Malakopaia, and if so, the description 'to the south of Malakopaia' would exactly apply to Sasima. The next important station on the route to Dorylaion, via Archelais, would be Nazianzos, and I propose to identify Nazianzos with Ibn Khurdadhbah's Marj al-Uskuf. I may point out that Nazianzos, rendered illustrious by its famous bishop Gregory, presents a motif for the name Marj al-Uskuf, 'bishop's meadow.' We may now return to the message of the Caliph to his general. They are in southern Cappadocia, marching to Ancyra, and Ashnas is warned of the imminent danger of an attack from a Roman army which the Emperor Theophilus is ready to throw across the river-Lamos. If the Emperor were on the banks of the Lamos, he was no more dangerous to the northward march of the Saracens than if he had been on the banks of a river in Europe. In few places could he have been more safely out of the way than in the kleisurarchy of . It is obvious that the Lamos has no relation to the military situation, and is simply an error of Tabari. The Emperor could not have been near the Lamos, for a few days later he fought a battle

10 Translated by De Goeje, Bibl. Geog. Arab. dadhbah made use of his works elsewhere (De vii. It is probable that the routes given by Goeje, 77). 11 Ibn Khutdadhbah were derived from the work Translation by Jaubert. of Al-Garmi, who wrote books on the history 12 Jahreshefte des sterreichischen archidolo- and geography of the Roman Empire. He had gischen Institutes, vii. 123-125 (1904). been a captive among the Romans and was 13 Some of Idrisi's stations are different, but released on the occasion of the exchange of both lists agree in Maij al-Uskuf. prisoners in A.D. 845. We' know from Masudi 1' This station is given by Idrisi as well as that he wrote about the roads (transl. by Carra Ibn Khurdadhbah. de Vaux, 257), and we know that Ibn Khur-

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUTASIM'S MARCH THROUGH CAPPADOCIA IN A.D. 838 123 in the north-east of Asia Minor, in the neighbourhood of Tokat. The tenor of the narrative and the circumstances of the situation enable us without difficulty to correct the error. The Lamos is a mistake fogr the Halys. Tabari did not realise the map of Asia Minor, and we may conjecture that the error arose from his having mentioned the Lamos at the beginning of the narrative (see above). Arabic chroniclers were familiar with the name of the Lamos, because the exchanges of captives were generally carried out on its banks. We can now understand the position. The Emperor, aware of the Caliph's designs on Ancyra, had assembled his forces east of the Halys. Calculating that the enemy would march by the Soandos-Parnassos road, which runs not far from the river, he intended to intercept it, crossing the river either near Parnassos, or at Zoropassos (north of Soandos), according to circumstances. The Caliph had received information that the Emperor was somewhere on the right of the Halys and he judged it imprudent to continue the march until the precise whereabouts and movements of the Romans were discovered. Three days later Ashnas received another despatch from Mutasim, commanding him to send an officer with a squadron of horse to search for and capture a Greek, who could give information about the Emperor and his army. Ashnas sent two hundred horsemen under Amr al-Fargani, who set out at night and rode to the fortress of Kurra, hoping to find in its environs some one who could tell them what they wanted to know. They did not succeed, and the commandant of Kurra laid an ambush for them 'in the mountains which are between Kurra and Durra.' ' This is a large mountain,' and it is in the district known as the district of Kurra. The Saracen captain, knowing of the ambush, went towards Durra and lay concealed till break of day. Then he divided his force into three bands and sent them in different directions to find a well-informed Greek, appointing a place of rendezvous. Amr caught one man, who belonged to the garrison of Kurra. He said that the Emperor was near at hand, 'behind the Lamos,' at a distance of four parasangs.15 Kurra often meets us in the Arabic chronicles. It is the fortress of Koron which Ramsay has identified with Viran Sheher, not far to the south- east of Archelais, and in the outskirts of Mt. Argaios (Hassan Dagh).16 (As Koron was the residence of the kleisurarch of Cappadocia, it was natural for Ashnas to calculate that the position of the Emperor would be known to the garrison.) Argaios is evidently the mountain meant by Tabari, and Durra must have lain on another of this mountain. The conjecture of Vasil'ev that is meant does not suit the data, since Ramsay seems to be right in placing Doara at Haji Bektash, which lies beyond the Halys, considerably to the north of Soandos. Durra must be sought within an easy ride of Viran Sheher, somewhere in the skirts of Hassan Dagh. I conjecture that it may

15 Tabari, 31-2. Tabari seems to mean four Halys. I will return to this point further on. 16 parasangs from the place where Amr captured Historical Geog. 355, Lycaonia 127. The the Greek. This is impossible, as Hassan Dagh second beacon station from Lulon was, as is much further from the nearest point on the Ramsay has shown, on this Mt. Argaios.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 124 J. B. BURY be the same as which seems to have been in this region and is placed in Mr. Anderson's map at Halvadere on the north-west side of Hassan Dagh.17 The data supplied (so far) by Tabari are not inconsistent with the hypo- thesis that Marj al-Uskuf is Nazianzos. The argument may be stated as follows: (1) Marj al-Uskuf was a station on a route from Podandos to Dorylaion, which Ramsay, on independent grounds identified as passing by Sasima, Nazianzos, and Archelais. (2) It was north of some locality in Matamir, and was on the way to Ancyra. (3) It was not very far from Koron. (4) It was at such a distance from the Halys that a day's march might bring an army advancing northward within striking distance of an army encamped on the other side of the river. There is, however, another possibility. The name Marj al-Uskuf may have had two meanings, a wider and a narrower. It may have not only designated a place (e.g. Nazianzos), as it certainly does in the itinerary of Ibn Khurdadhbah; it may also have described a district (like Matamir). Such a signification is suggested by another passage in which the name occurs, namely in Tabari's account of the perplexing campaign of A.D. 863. This campaign has been discussed by Ramsay, but he has not cleared up the difficulties.s1 The two longest accounts, that of Genesios and that of the Continuer of Theophanes, are independent. They both agree that the Saracen general captured Amisos, and both relate the anecdote that like Xerxes he lashed the waters of the because they hindered him from advancing further north. Neither the Logothete nor the Arabic chroniclers say anything about Amisos. The Logothete, however, records that Omar advanced plundering as far as Sinope, but he records this march as if it belonged to a different expedition and to a previous year.19 Neither Genesios nor the Continuer mentions Sinope.

7 Following Ramsay's conjecture, Hist. Geog. Bonn 825, ed. Muralt, 733-4 ; Theodosios Mel. 308. Cp. Strabo, 12. 2. 5, " r eAp-yos pvula 167, Leo Gramm. 238; cp. Pseudo-Symeon, i4XAbw wprps rT- Ta6pc1 Kal 7ra NWpa ? vvp 666); Genesios, 94-7; Cont. Th. 179-83. Kaxc-raL N7poaoredSs,~' ; E'z'~r" s WroXIopKolIEVos Skylitzes (Cedrenus 163-5) abbreviates from &vTXrre woxbrv Xpovov. He adds that Sisinas Cont. Th. (but 165, he adds wprs as MEhAL•rvrv, kept his treasures in it. This passage shows the goal of the Emir's son, perhaps suo marte ; that Nora was a fort, and suggests that it was and he interchanges the names of the river and not far from Argos. Argos, as Ramsay says the meadow). Zonaras, xvi. 3, 16-29 (ed. (353), must be associated with Mt. Argaios. Biittner-Wobst, 396-7) depends on Skylitzes. 28 Hist. Geography77 (He is mistaken in the 19 George Mon. ed. Bonn, 824, c. 16. The date which he gives as A.D. 860). The author- notice is separated from the account of the ities are: (1) Arabic, Yakubi (11) ; Tabari, 62 battle of Lalakaon by a notice of Michael's (cp. Abu '1-Fida, Annalb, ed. Reiske, ii. 208); expedition against the Bulgarians. (2) Greek, the Logothete (= George Mon. ed.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUTASIM'S MARCH THROUGH CAPPADOCIA IN A.D. 838 125

According to the narrative of Genesios, Omar was at Amisos when he heard that Petronas had been appointed commander of the Imperial forces and was about to take the field. He immediately left Amisos and marched 'about 500 miles' to a place called Porson, in the district of Abysianon 'on the borders of the Armeniac theme and ' and encamped on the side of a hill. Petronas was on the other side of this hill. Both commanders sent detachments to occupy the summit of the hill; a struggle ensued, and the Romans were successful. Subsequently there was a battle, in which Omar was defeated and slain. His son and a hundred followers escaped and crossed the Halys, but their flight was cut off in the Charsian province by Machairas, the merarch of that province. According to the Continuer, Petronas found Omar encamped at a place called Poson which was naturally defensible (& 7Twerpiv Kat Kp~y~vtov),near a river named Lalakaon, which flows from north to south, along a meadow called Gyrin (Q'-potuc/Kj fOw ).20 It was the object of Petronas to prevent him from escaping. He accordingly ordered the Generals of the Armeniacs, the Bucellarians, Kolonea, and Paphlagonia to close round on the north; those of the Anatolics, the Opsikians, and Cappadocia, with the kleisurarchs of Seleucia and , to gather on the south ; while he, with his own Thracesians, the Thracian and Macedonian themes, and the Imperial tagmata, closed in on the west. The east is not mentioned; but the river Halys was in itself an obstacle on that side, and the Koloneans at the extremity of the northern, and the Charsians at the extremity of the southern ring, sufficiently provided against escape in that direction. This passage is evidently derived from a good source, but it is followed by matter of different order, the anecdote of Omar's augury of disaster. When Omar heard that he was surrounded by the enemy, like a wild beast in a trap, he decided to take an augury, and sending for one of his captives he inquired the names of the place and the river and the meadow. The prisoner gave the name of the as Pt6son place (tKpepv IIrCo'-ovra 7rapayrpapy/Uar'tOV y1o-YevvaT' H&rovTa), whence Omar inferred his own fall (wr&o-tv).21 From the name of the river Lalakaon, he augured the defeat of his army (Xaof and from that of the meadow (Fi3ptv) that the Moslems would be tnco•dwtv), heavily routed (7/vpto-0ivat) by the Romans. It is evident that Greek punning on the local names post eventumngave rise to the anecdote. Omar then first sought to break through the enemy on the north, but was deterred by their strength and the difficulty of the ground. Finding it equally impracticable to escape by the south, he finally attacked Petronas, who was

20 Poson is the only one of the local names to the Lalakon family, members of which we mentioned by both Genesios and the Continuer. meet elsewhere in history (e.g. Const. Porph. Lalakaon rbv is mentioned by De adin. imp. c. 45, 199; Nicetas, Vita (JIs AaAcah•dva) p. the Logothete. None of the names are found, so Ignatii, in Harduin, Cone. v. p. 964). Of course far as I know, in other contexts. Ramsay a local connexion of the name is possible. refers to a correspondent of Photios, OEd4o'ros 21 This pun shows that rndiav is the correct Ka'Tr 'robs AaAdKcwvas (Ep. 63, ed. Valettas, form of the name, not no'prowv as it is written p. 367). This means that Theodotos belonged in the text of Genesios.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 126 J. B. BURY

encamped on the western side of his position. From the brief description of the battle which follows, it appears that after the Saracens had been repelled by the army of Petronas, the northern and southern armies rushed in, and almost annihilated them. Omar's son and a small band escaped, but were captured and slain by the kleisurarch of Charsianon. It is clear that the accounts of Genesios and the Continuer are derived from different sources. They are both embroidered with anecdotes, which I have not, with two exceptions, reproduced, but these anecdotes, saving the scourging of the sea, are not the same. Hirsch says that the description of the battle in Genesios is completely different (vollstidndig abweicht) from that in the Continuer;22 but there does not seem to be any inconsistency. The occupation of the hill, recorded by Genesios, may have been achieved days before the battle. Genesios does not mention the principal feature of the situation, the fact that Omar was surrounded, but his brief account does not imply anything inconsistent with this fact. The trustworthiness of the general narrative of the Continuer in regard to the position in which Omar's army was placed is borne out by the Arabic writers, Yakubi and Tabari, both of whom say that Omar was 'surrounded.' For determining the locality of the battle the Greek sources furnish the following indications: (1) Omar marched about 500 miles from Amisos (Genesios); (2) the district was near the borders of the Armeniac and Paphlagonian themes (Genesios) ; (3) the place was west of the Halys, near the borders of the Charsian theme (Genesios), and (4) close to a river flowing from north to south (Continuer); (5) there was a hill to the west of Omar's position at Poson (Genesios), and (6) there was rough and difficult ground to the north of his position (Continuer).

With the last three of these indications, I am unable to deal; but it may be possible from the other data to determine, within limits, the region in which the scene of the battle is to be sought. Ramsay adds another condition. He says that the battle was fought 'on the road that leads south from Sinope.' But the sources do not warrant this inference. Genesios expressly'states that Omar marched from Amisos 22a; and the sole reference to Sinope is the notice (mentioned above) in the Logothete's chronicle. The only way of combining that notice with the other data is to suppose that having taken Amisos, Omar proceeded along the coast as far as Sinope and then returned to Amisos. We are not justified in introducing Sinope into the conditions of the problem.

22 Byzantinische Studien, 157. 22a -io6rc as a'r6 'Apvo-o.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUTASIM'S MARCH THROUGH CAPPADOCIA IN A.D. 838 127

Ramsay at once dismisses (1), merely saying that it 'is so absurd as to suggest a doubt about the text' of Genesios. But taken by itself, why is it absurd ? Of course a march of 500 Roman miles southward from Amisus as the crow flies would have plunged Omar's army in the waves of the Mediterranean. But a march of 500 miles by the roads need do nothing of the kind. The distance is only absurd when compared with other data, and therefore it is not permissible to dismiss it until the inconsistent data are shown to be true or probable. Genesios may have been mistaken in locating the scene of operations near the borders of the Armeniac and Paphlagonian themes. Accepting this datum and assuming that Omar marched from Sinope, Ramsay says: 'There are only two localities which can suit this description, one where the road from Sinope descends to Boiabad and the Halys, the other further south, where it again descends towards Andrapa and the Halys.' (Andrapa here is the Paphlagonian town of that name= Neoclaudiopolis.) The second hypothesis suits the proximity of the Charsian theme, and Ramsay decides in its favour. He marks the places in one of his maps conjecturally,23 and says 'accurate exploration might probably determine the very spot where the battle was fought.' Before proceeding further, it will be well to examine the objects of the contending parties. The Continuer brings out quite clearly that the arrangements of Petronas were designed to intercept and surround the Saracen army. What was the object of Omar? Genesios, in Herodotean style, has a conversation to relate, which passed between Omar and his officers when they received the news at Amisos that Petronas had been appointed commander and was preparing to take the field. The advice of the officers was that they should immediately retreat by the road by which they had come. 'If Petronas pursues and overtakes us, then we shall fight; if not, we shall reach home safely.' Omar however refused to take this advice. 'I will not let him accuse me of cowardice,' he said, 'I will go to meet him.' An anecdote of this kind cannot count for much, and it is not consistent with the account of the battle in the Continuer, where Omar appears anxious, not for a battle but to get away. The Logothete's chronicle furnishes the clue. The Roman generals waylaid the Saracen on his retreat24 T_ 4r7oo70TpO~F aiToVi). We may therefore infer (XoXiaTav7•T6 7"V that Omar, having marched into Roman territory by the eastern road from Melitene, instead of returning by the same way and so eluding Petronas, decided on-what probably was his original plan-marching home by the Pass of Podandos and the Cilician Gates, thus taking the risk of meeting the Roman army. To do this he had to cross the Halys, and several routes were open to him. No indication of the route is given in the authorities, and his choice of course depended on military considerations which are unknown to us. The most direct road to Tyana would have been by Caesarea, but Omar may have planned originally to plunder the districts to the west of the Halys and

a 24 Hist. Geog. Map between pp. 196 an 1 197. George Mon. ed. Bonn, 825.

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 128 J. B. BURY

determined to adhere to his programme. Supposing that he marched via Amasea--Taviumn-Kuruk Kale (crossing of the Halys)-Ancyra -Parnassos, he would have traversed on reaching Soandos, a good deal more than 450 Roman miles.25 This shows that the distance given by Genesios ' about 500 miles' is not in itself absurd, though inconsistent with another part of his statement. The question therefore must be asked: are we to reject his distance or his assertion that the district was on the borders of the Armeniac and Paphlagonian themes? If we had no other infor- mation, we might conclude (with Ramsay) that the distance was more likely to be erroneous. But we have other information. Tabari states that the battle, in which Omar was killed, was fought at -rz, in Marj al-Uskuf. The initial letter of the place is aieph.26 It is clear that in this passage Marj al-Uskuf is the name, not of a place but of a district. Naturally it was a district in proximity to the place Marj al-Uskuf; hence it follows by our previous results that it was a district lying north of Matamir. It was therefore a region through which Omar's route to the Cilician pass, if he marched west of the Halys, would necessarily lie. Its limits of course we cannot tell; but if it stretched to the north of a line drawn from Nazianzos by Venasa to Soandos, a locality in this region would be reconcilable with the distance from Amisos given by Genesios. The independent evidence of Tabari leads me to conclude that the location of Poson and the stream of Lalakaon on the borders of the Paphla- gonian and Armeniac themes is the mistake committed by Genesios, and that Omar, when Petronas found him, had advanced much further on his home- ward route, and was in the region south of . From the account of the Continuer we may infer that he was close to the Halys, and not near a crossing, for he is not said to have made an attempt to escape on that side. I would ask travellers in this part of Cappadocia to search for the site of the battle in the region between Nyssa and the crossing of Zoropassos. This discussion of the campaign of A.D. 863 was necessary to elucidate the passage in Tabari, which proves that Marj al-Uskuf meant a district as well as a place. I now go on to show that in Tabari's narrative of the campaign of AD. 838, it also probably denotes the district. The information furnished to Amr by the Greek captive, that the Emperor's army was 'near him, beyond the Halys, at a distance of four parasangs,'27 must obviously signify the distance of the Emperor from the camp of Ashnas, not from the place where Amr caught the captive, in the vicinity

25 I measured on Anderson's map of Asia from his own Thracesian Theme (the anecdote Minor. The distance comes to 450 Roman in Cont. Th. 180 makes him visit Mt. Latros miles, but if we allow for twistings of the roads just before he started), and the most direct way and gradients, it must be considerably more. to intercept Omarwould have been by Archelais. 26 Baron Rosen (Tabari, ed. De Goeje iii. The Thracian, Macedonian, and tagmatic troops, 1509) thought that the three letters may be marching by Dorylaion and Amorion, might read k, r, n ; and Vasil'ev suggests (202, 11. 5) have joined him, e.g. at Tyriaion or Laodicea that the name may correspond to rvpwv.--We Kekaumene. are unable to say how Petronas reached the 27 Tabari, 32, and confirmed, 35. scene of the battle. No. doubt, he set out

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUTASIM'S MARCH THROUGH CAPPADOCIA IN A.D. 838 129 of Koron and Hassan Dagh. For Koron was at least twelve parasangs from the Halys. This is confirmed by the words with which Tabari records the return of Amr to the general's camp. He and his party proceeded 'to Ashnas, to the Lamos,' i.e. the Halys. This shows that the camp was near the river. We may suppose that it was somewhere north of Soandos on the road to Parnassos and Ancyra, which runs near the Halys. The Emperor, encamped on the other side, could cross at Zoropassos. Before he returned to the camp, Amr captured some other Greeks who belonged to the Emperor's army. From them it was ascertained that the Emperor had been waiting for thirty days beyond the Halys, to intercept Mutasim's army; but when he had learned, a short time ago, that Afshin was advancing from the east, he marched with part of his forces to oppose him, leaving his cousin in command on the Halys. Soon after this, both Mutasim and Ashnas resumed their progress to Ancyra. There was a day's march between them.21 Nothing is said of any attempt of the Emperor's cousin to attack them; and we discover afterwards the curious fact that after the Emperor's departure' the army broke up; the soldiers left the Emperor's kinsman whom he named commander of the army in his own stead.' 29 I do not propose to follow the campaign further. Tabari throws no light on the geographical problems connected with the battle in which Theophilus was defeated by Afshin in the region of Amasea.30 I have tried to show that Marj al-Uskuf in the Arabic writers has two meanings-a place and a district: that the place is probably Nazianzos, and that the district extended north of the district known as Matamir, from Nazianzos, to the Halys, perhaps as far north as Nyssa. J. B. BURY.

P.S.-P. 122. The suggestion of another road from Podandos to Andabalis not passing Nigde is negatived by Sir W. M. Ramsay, who has pointed out to me that the Ala Dagh, a ridge 10,000 feet high, stretches N. and S. on the east of the road to Nigde. In regard to the identification I propose of Al-Kanais with Sasima or Hassa Keui, he reminds me that this place has still some ecclesiastical importance as the refuge of St. Macrina. P. 123, note 16. It may be well to caution the reader more explicitly against confounding Mt. Argaios near Archelais with the great Mt. Argaios near Caesarea. P. 126, at foot. I should have added that the words of the Chronicle (cp. George Mon. 824 ed. Bonn), ir'o-rpeFE ) KaraXrI(A?e K.T.X., implyingthat Omarreturned from Sinope to Saracen territory, are against the connexion of this expedition with that of A.D. 863. J. B. B.

28 If we may assume that there had been nas would have been in the neighbourhood of about the same distance between the camps, Soandos. then, if we suppose that Mutasim was encamped 29 Tabari, 36. somewhere near Malakopaia, in Matamir, Ash- 30 Cp. Ramsay, Hist. Geog. 329-30.

H.S. VOL. XXIX. K

This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:14:34 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions