A History of Macroeconomic Policy in the United States
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Steven CA Pincus James A. Robinson Working Pape
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT REALLY HAPPENED DURING THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION? Steven C.A. Pincus James A. Robinson Working Paper 17206 http://www.nber.org/papers/w17206 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2011 This paper was written for Douglass North’s 90th Birthday celebration. We would like to thank Doug, Daron Acemoglu, Stanley Engerman, Joel Mokyr and Barry Weingast for their comments and suggestions. We are grateful to Dan Bogart, Julian Hoppit and David Stasavage for providing us with their data and to María Angélica Bautista and Leslie Thiebert for their superb research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2011 by Steven C.A. Pincus and James A. Robinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. What Really Happened During the Glorious Revolution? Steven C.A. Pincus and James A. Robinson NBER Working Paper No. 17206 July 2011 JEL No. D78,N13,N43 ABSTRACT The English Glorious Revolution of 1688-89 is one of the most famous instances of ‘institutional’ change in world history which has fascinated scholars because of the role it may have played in creating an environment conducive to making England the first industrial nation. -
The Newtons of Lincolnshire
Durham E-Theses The Social Production of Gentility and Capital in Early Modern England: The Newtons of Lincolnshire. NEWTON, RUSSELL,SCOTT,HENRY How to cite: NEWTON, RUSSELL,SCOTT,HENRY (2017) The Social Production of Gentility and Capital in Early Modern England: The Newtons of Lincolnshire., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12108/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Social Production of Gentility and Capital in Early Modern England: The Newtons of Lincolnshire. Russell Newton A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Durham England September 2016 ABSTRACT The Social Production of Gentility and Capital in Early Modern England: The Newtons of Lincolnshire. Russell Newton This thesis has two principal aims; first, to examine and illuminate the social production of gentility and capital which was experienced by the Newton family between the early part of the seventeenth century and c.1743. -
The Background to the Sacheverel Riots
The Background to the Sacheverell Riots of 1714 and 1715 in Birmingham and the Sutton Coldfield Connection By Roy Billingham Henry Sacheverell, by Thomas Gibson, c.1710 In the autumn of 1714 the townsfolk of Sutton Coldfield were witnesses to an event that occurred at their parish church that was symptomatic of the religious and political passions which were rife at this period both in the Midlands and elsewhere in Britain. Jacobitism was like a smouldering fuse that burnt for many years creating social unrest and threatening mayhem, and Sutton Coldfield played a minor role in this state of affairs in the Midlands. Queen Anne had recently died and the Nation was facing up to the Hanoverian succession that was bitterly opposed by many sections of society who were either in favour of a hereditary royal succession or were against the imposition of a foreign king. However, it perhaps will help our understanding of these turbulent events if we consider the elements of British history that contributed to this situation. Following the controversial ‘warming-pan’ birth of James Francis Edward Stuart in 1688 to Mary of Modena, James II’s second wife and a Catholic whose babies had previously either miscarried or died in infancy, and after receiving a written invitation from four Whig lords and three Tories, the Calvinist William III of Orange landed at Brixham on November 5, 1688, with the intention of dethroning the unpopular and despotic Catholic King James II. William and his army marched on London and James II fled to France. William agreed eventually to accept the crown jointly with his wife Mary Stuart in May 1689. -
The Transformation of the Heads of Grievances Into the Declaration of Rights 22 January--12 February 1689
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1980 The transformation of the Heads of Grievances into the Declaration of Rights 22 January--12 February 1689 Catherine Rand Chamberlin College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Chamberlin, Catherine Rand, "The transformation of the Heads of Grievances into the Declaration of Rights 22 January--12 February 1689" (1980). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625105. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-qzhr-xs57 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE HEADS OF GRIEVANCES n INTO THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS 22 JANUARY - 12 FEBRUARY 1689 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Catherine Rand Chamberlin *•*> 1980 ProQuest Number: 10626280 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. -
Policy and Power Ideas, Policymaking and Practice In
Durham E-Theses POLICY AND POWER: IDEAS, POLICYMAKING AND PRACTICE IN 1670S ENGLAND CRESSEY, MICHAEL,JAMES How to cite: CRESSEY, MICHAEL,JAMES (2017) POLICY AND POWER: IDEAS, POLICYMAKING AND PRACTICE IN 1670S ENGLAND , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12258/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 POLICY AND POWER IDEAS, POLICYMAKING AND PRACTICE IN 1670S ENGLAND Michael J. Cressey A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Durham University Autumn 2016 Abstract This thesis is about how and why Restoration-period political culture changed in England in the run up to the dissolution of the Oxford Parliament in March 1681. It argues that it was the tension between Charles II’s desire and attempts to rule personally and his opponents’ desire and attempts to prevent him from doing so, which drove politics and change during the 1670s. -
The Growth of the Fear of France in the Reign of Charles Ii
BOYER, Hugh Eiserihart, 1939- THE GROWTH OF THE FEAR OF FRANCE IN THE REIGN OF CHARLES II. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1969 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Q Copyright by Aigh Eisenhart Boyer |1970{ THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE GROWTH OF THE FEAR OF FRANCE IN THE REIGN OF CHARLES II DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Hugh Eisenhart Boyer, A.B., M.A. ****** The Ohio State University 1969 Approved by dvlser Department of History TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................ iii VITA................................................ iv PREFACE............................................. v Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION................................ 1 II. ENGLISH SECURITY............................ 13 III. ANGLO-FRENCH TRADE RIVALRY.................... 58 IV. POPERY...................................... 71 V. ARBITRARY GOVERNMENT............. 90 VI. CONCLUSION.................. 100 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................ 104 il ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank all those who were so helpful in making the completion of this dissertation possible. First and foremost, 1 wish to thank Prof. Clayton Roberts for his direction and assistance. Professor John C. Rule and Professor Wallace Maurer also made helpful suggestions. In addition I wish to thank the staffs of the Ohio State University Library, the University of Minnesota Li brary, the Columbia University Library and the New York Public Library for their help in obtaining research material. Finally, 1 wish to thank Mrs. Carol Scherer of Mount Pleasant, Michigan and Mrs. Sandra Dicks of Columbus, Ohio for their help in typing the manuscript. H.E.B. Columbus, Ohio August 18, 1969 iii VITA February 6, 1939... -
The Political and Constitutional Significance of the Exclusion Crisis of 1678-1681
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1981 The political and constitutional significance of the Exclusion Crisis of 1678-1681 Susan Diane Meyer-Strom Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Meyer-Strom, Susan Diane, "The political and constitutional significance of the Exclusion Crisis of 1678-1681" (1981). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3076. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3070 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. ·---.. ........ ... ....... _... _ ...... ---................... ... ... ....... ... ... _ ...... - .. --- ... - -- AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Susan Diane Meyer-Strom for the Master of Arts in History presented March 31, 1981. Title: The Political and Constitutional Significance of the Exclusion Crisis of 1678-1681. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Ann Weikel ci;·~.: --- - ·-- - - ~ /Susan C. Karant-Nunn Frank 1n C. West ' , By examining the attacks waged against the royal prerogative during the Exclusion Crisis of 1678-1681, this thesis asserts that the crisis was primarily constitutional in nature, rather than religious. This Parliamentary attempt to remove the Catholic heir presumptive from the succession endangered the monarchy by creating a Parliamentary title to the throne. Insofar as the exclusionists challenged the king's right to retain ministers at will, to grant pardons, and to determine the calling and dissolution of Parliamentary sessions, the crisis also constituted a direct assault upon the prerogatives of the present king. -
William Penn and English Politics in 1680-81
William Penn and English Politics in 1680-81 NEW LIGHT ON THE GRANTING OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CHARTER* By FULMER MOOD, International Research Fellow, Huntington Library, San Marino, California. HE classic explanation why Charles II made a grant of the charter of Pennsylvania is well known. " [Penn] T inherited from his father ", writes Janney, " a claim on the British government for money advanced and services rendered to the amount of sixteen thousand pounds, and in the year 1680 petitioned Charles II to grant him, in lieu of this sum, a tract of country in America, lying north of Maryland . ."* This story, like a hardy perennial, is always cropping up; it is found in President Sharpless's history,2 in Rayner Kelsey's recent biographical sketch of Penn,3 and in numerous other works, including elementary school textbooks in history.4 The vogue that this story has enjoyed is easy to explain as soon as it is understood that William Penn himself was its author. That genial old antiquary and gossip of Restoration times, John Aubrey, in a few notes on Penn in one of his Brief Lives, has this to say : " His majestie owing to his father 10 ooo li., 16—, (which, with the interest of it, came not to lesse than 20 ooo li.,) did, in consideration therof, grant to him and his heirs a province in America which his majestie was pleased to name Pennsylvania, the 4th day of March 1680/1, to which he is now goeing this next September i68i."5 From the context of this note it is clear that Penn gave this explanation to Aubrey not more than a few months after the grant of the charter. -
The Jury's Rise As Lie Detector
Articles The Jury's Rise as Lie Detector George Fisher' CONTENTS 1. THE ORDEAL AND THE JURY TRIAL: THEORETICAL PRELUDE ..... 585 A. Seeking Divine Sanction for Criminal Verdicts ............ 587 B. The Special Case of Capital Convictions ................ 595 C. The Reality Beneath the Illusion ..................... 600 II. THE RISE OF DEFENSE WITNESSES ............... ........ 602 A. Curtains Open: The Sixteenth Century. ........ ........ 602 B. The Act To Abolish Hostilities with Scotland ..... ........ 609 C. The Treason Trials and the Treason Act of 1696 . .. .. 6 15 III. COPING WITH CREDIBILITY CONFLICTS .................... 624 A. Witness Competency Rules and the Rule of Bethel's Case .... 624 B. Empirical Interlude: Criminal Trials in an Eighteenth-Century Court ...................... 638 C. Alibis and the Problem of Unavoidable Conflicts ...... 650 IV. THE RISE OF DEFENDANT TESTIMONY .................... 656 A. The Downfall of Witness Competency Rules in Civil Cases .. 659 B. The Downfall of the Prohibition Against Defendant Testimony in Criminal Cases ................................. 662 Associate Professor, Stanford Law School. I would like to thank Al Alschul"r. Barbara Babcock. Simon Devereaux. Eric Foner, Barbara Fried, Lawrence Fnedman. Tom Gallants. David Gold, Hank Greeley, Tom Green, Tom Grey, Dick Helmholz, Adam Hirsch. Dan Klerman. John Langbcn. Michael Macnair, Barbara Shapiro, Avi Soifer, Bob Weisberg, and Kenji Yoshino for guiding my research and commenting critically and perceptively on earlier drafts. Alexis Hailer. Allison Marston. Tamt Swiger. Michael Risher, Mark Houle, and Lisa Tingue contnbuted long hours of excellent research support Xia Chen and Andrew Gurthet of the Stanford Law School Library collccted dozens of far-llung sources And Ariela Dubler and her editorial colleagues have worked with care and insight 575 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. -
Dr. Henry Sacheverell
F. F. MAD AN: A Critical Bibliography of DR. HENRY SACHEVERELL Edited by W. A. Speck Is ^ LISTENING TO D5 SACHEVEKEL PREAC1HN< UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LIBRARIES 1978 Front cover: Bas-relief on the base of the statue of Samuel Johnson at Lichfield (Photo: James Helyar) "When Dr. Sacheverel was at Lichfield, Johnson was not quite three years old. My grandfather Hammond observed him at the cathe• dral perched upon his father's shoulders, listening, and gaping at the much celebrated preacher. Mr. Hammond asked Mr. Johnson how he could possibly think of bringing such an infant to church, and in the midst of so great a croud. He answered, because it was impossible to keep him at home; for, young as he was, he believed he had caught the publick spirit and zeal for Sacheverel, and would have staid for ever in the church, satisfied with beholding him." Letter from Mary Adye, quoted by Boswell. University of Kansas Fuhlications Library Series, 43 F. F. MAD AN A Critical Bibliography of DR. HENRY SACHEVERELL Edited by W. A. Speck UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LIBRARIES Lawrence, Kansas 1978 PRINTED IN LAWRENCE, KANSAS, U.S.A., BY THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PRINTING SERVICE PREFACE The late F. F. Madan spent much of the time between his retirement from the Indian civil service and his death in 1961 compiling this Bibliography. The basis for it was provided by the Bibliography of Dr. Henry Sacheverdl first contributed to The Bibliographer by his father, Falconer Madan, in 1883 and 1884, and later expanded into a book published in 1884 in a limited edition of 100 copies. -
Religious Fear and Democratic Sensibilities in Early America
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2018 Papal Plots and Muslim Mischief: Religious Fear and Democratic Sensibilities in Early America J. Logan Tomlin University of Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Tomlin, J. Logan, "Papal Plots and Muslim Mischief: Religious Fear and Democratic Sensibilities in Early America. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2018. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4988 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by J. Logan Tomlin entitled "Papal Plots and Muslim Mischief: Religious Fear and Democratic Sensibilities in Early America." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Christopher P. Magra, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Kristen J. Block, Mark D. Hulsether, Carl T. Olsson Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Papal Plots and Muslim Mischief: Religious Fear and Democratic Sensibilities in Early America A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville J. -
The Clergy and Print in Eighteenth-Century England, C
The Clergy and Print in Eighteenth-Century England, c. 1714-1750 Jamie Marc Latham Selwyn College This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge September 2017 i The Clergy and Print in Eighteenth-Century England, c. 1714-1750 Jamie Latham, Selwyn College In much of the historiography surrounding print culture and the book trade, the worldliness of print remains a point of common emphasis. Indeed, many influential studies either assume or actively present the history of print as part of a broader ‘secularization thesis’. Recently, however, historians have challenged these narratives, recognizing the central role of religious print as a driver of growth within the book trade and discussion within the nascent ‘public sphere’. Yet the scholarship into ‘religion and the book’ remains fragmentary, focused on individual genres or persons, with no unified monograph or standard reference work yet to emerge. This dissertation addresses some of the barriers to synopsis by investigating the long-term print output of the largest social and professional group engaged in evangelizing Christianity to the public: the clergy of the Church of England. By focusing on the clergy, this dissertation evades the usual narrow focus on genre. In the past, book-historical and bibliographic studies have relied heavily on a priori classification schemes to study the market for print. While sufficient in the context of relatively well-defined genre categories, such as printed sermons, the validity of these classification schemes breaks down at the wider level, for example, under the conceptual burden of defining the highly fluid and wide-ranging category of ‘religious works’.