Diversity and Conservation Status of Large Branchiopods (Crustacea) in Ponds Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diversity and Conservation Status of Large Branchiopods (Crustacea) in Ponds Of Limnologica 42 (2012) 264–270 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Limnologica jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.de/limno Diversity and conservation status of large branchiopods (Crustacea) in ponds of western Poland ∗ Bartłomiej Gołdyn , Rafał Bernard, Michał Jan Czyz,˙ Anna Jankowiak Department of General Zoology, Institute of Environmental Biology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan,´ Poland a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: A survey on temporary ponds has been conducted in search for large branchiopod crustaceans (Anostraca, Received 27 June 2011 Notostraca, Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata) in Wielkopolska province (western Poland). 728 pools have Accepted 13 August 2012 been studied and large branchiopods have been found in 221 of them. Seven species have been recorded, including three anostracans: Branchipus schaefferi, Chirocephalus shadini and Eubranchipus grubii; two Keywords: notostracans: Lepidurus apus and Triops cancriformis; one spinicaudatan, Cyzicus tetracerus and one laevi- Crustaceans caudatan, Lynceus brachyurus. According to the analysis of co-occurrence, the species form three groups, Anostraca differing in habitat preferences and conservation status. The number of species shows that the diversity Notostraca Laevicaudata of globally threatened large branchiopods is still relatively high in the region. On the other hand, their Spinicaudata conservation status is highly diverse and in most species unfavourable. Distribution of all species is highly × Temporary water bodies clustered: large branchiopods have been generally found in 33 UTM squares (10 10 km) of 96 squares Distribution studied. However, only two species, i.e. E. grubii and L. apus occurred in more than five such squares Conservation and could be assessed as moderately widespread. Most water bodies inhabited by large branchiopods occur in groups forming patches of suitable habitats which are dispersed among prevailing seemingly unsuitable areas. Sustaining the existence of large metapopulations seems, therefore, to be essential for conservation of branchiopod species diversity. Field observations also bring some examples of human activities unintentionally supporting the branchiopod conservation. © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Introduction studied since the early 1970s and the data on their distribu- tion are scarce. Up till now, 13 species of large branchiopods Large branchiopod crustaceans (Anostraca, Notostraca, Laevi- have been recorded from Poland (Zwolski 1956; Jurasz 2008), i.e. caudata, Spinicaudata) as typical inhabitants of temporary waters (i) Anostraca: Branchinecta paludosa (O.F. Müller, 1788), Branchi- are believed to be threatened worldwide due to the decline in pus schaefferi (Fischer, 1834), Chirocephalus diaphanus Prévost, their habitats (Brendonck et al. 2008). In many European countries, 1803, Chirocephalus shadini (Smirnov, 1928), Eubranchipus grubii some of the previously recorded species have become extinct or (Dybowski, 1860), Streptocephalus torvicornis (Waga, 1842), (ii) Lae- considerably rarer than in the past (e.g. Eder and Hödl 2002; Král vicaudata: Lynceus brachyurus O.F. Müller, 1776, (iii) Notostraca: and Stambergovᡠ2005). Representatives of this group gain special Lepidurus apus (Linnaeus, 1758), Triops cancriformis (Bosc, 1801) attention due their mostly unfavourable conservation status and and (iv) Spinicaudata: Cyzicus tetracerus (Krynicki, 1830) and Lim- because they are treated as flagships of temporary waters. Thus, nadia lenticularis (Linnaeus, 1761). The only species that is redlisted in many countries all representatives of this group are redlisted and until recently protected in the country is B. paludosa, known and protected (e.g. Maier 1998; Eder and Hödl 2002; Král and in Poland from only one locality in the Tatra Mts. and currently Stambergovᡠ2005). regarded as extinct (Kownacki et al. 2002). Moreover, even this The knowledge of large branchiopods in much of Central anostracan was removed from the list of protected animal species and Eastern Europe is poor. On the other hand, recent inves- in November 2011. tigations have shown that much of their remaining European Data on the occurrence of large branchiopods in Poland in most diversity is located in this part of the continent (Brtek and of the cases date back to the turn of the 20th century (e.g. Ramułt Thiéry 1995; Nagorskaja et al. 1998; Demeter and Hartel 2007; 1939) and later reports have been very scarce (e.g. Zwolski 1956). Boven et al. 2008). In Poland these crustaceans have not been Lack of recent data on distribution and conservation status of large branchiopods result in total lack of a conservation policy for this group. What is more, most of the considered species are usually ∗ regarded as common in the country by the authors of popular- Corresponding author. Tel.: +48 61 829 58 49. scientific publications, referencing to the situation reported in the E-mail address: [email protected] (B. Gołdyn). 0075-9511/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2012.08.006 B. Gołdyn et al. / Limnologica 42 (2012) 264–270 265 outdated papers. Since the conservation status of large branchio- Field sampling pod populations in most of the adjacent countries seems to be critical (cf Maier 1998; Král and Stambergovᡠ2005; Dovgal and The field trips started each year in April, when adults of Samchischina 2009), the need for surveys, mapping the distribution large branchiopods were observed on previously known localities of this group in Poland and assessing its diversity and abundance, (Gołdyn et al. 2007), and lasted till late September. The survey fol- becomes essential. lowed the life cycle of particular species. As the occurrence of most The aim of the present study has been to assess the species rich- species is limited to the spring, the search for them was concen- ness, distribution and conservation status of large branchiopods in trated in this period. The potential occurrence of late spring and Wielkopolska province, Western Poland. Wielkopolska – as many summer species was also controlled during successive months. In other European regions – has been long inhabited and inten- the dry summer months (July, August) samplings were conducted sively exploited by man. However, it is still rich in small water at least one week after heavy rainfall. bodies, so in potential large branchiopod habitats. Particular parts Each water body was searched qualitatively for the presence of of this region have diverse relief and numbers of water bodies as a large branchiopods using a hand dip net (40 cm in diameter, mesh consequence of different glacial history. Thus, this region offers an of 1 mm) towed along all the available habitats. In early spring and opportunity to analyse the species’ conservation status with ref- after heavy rainfall, additional zooplankton samples (10–20 l) were erence to natural conditions and human impact. Considering the collected using a plankton net (mesh of 50 ␮m) and searched in characteristics of the region we hypothesised that: the laboratory for large branchiopod nauplii. When larvae were found, the water body was sampled again for adult individuals later in the season. Samples of the upper layer of sediments were col- (i) the conservation status of large branchiopods in Wielkopolska lected from random parts of the pools that were dry during the is more favourable than in most European countries, especially survey to check for the presence of dormant eggs of large bran- those with rapidly vanishing small water bodies chiopods; each collective sample contained ca 1 l of sediments. In (ii) geomorphologically diverse parts of the region differ in species the laboratory, samples were inundated in 15 l of deionised water ◦ richness and numbers of populations at 20 C. The containers were checked every two days for the pres- (iii) some large branchiopods – known to be disturbance depend- ence of hatchlings. If present, they were isolated and grown to the ent – are related to strongly transformed localities. adult stage. Large branchiopods found during the survey were pre- served in 70% ethanol and identified to species level following Brtek (1962). Voucher specimens of the recorded species together with detailed geographical coordinates of the localities are stored in the Material and methods Natural History Collections, AMU, Poznan,´ Poland. Study area Statistical analyses The monitoring took place in the Wielkopolska Province, west- ◦ ◦ To check for differences in large branchiopod species rich- ern Poland (centre of the Province: ca 52 22 N; 17 26 E). The region 2 ness and composition in particular geomorphological subregions covers 29,826 km of lowlands, which in central and northern parts of Wielkopolska, Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was used (Jongman are dominated by young glacial and glaciofluvial landscapes and × et al. 1995). Particular 10 10 km squares surveyed were treated as in the south by less diversified old-glacial (periglacial) plains and samples, where percentage of surveyed water bodies inhabited by hills (Richling and Dabrowski˛ 1995). The central and northern each species was used to describe its frequency. Six geomorpholog- moraine areas are separated by ice-marginal stream valley with ical regions were distinguished and introduced to the analysis as inland dunes overgrown by pine forests. explanatory variables: moraine terrains of the central and north- Wielkopolska is located in the temperate
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) Inferred from Nuclear 18S Ribosomal DNA (18S Rdna) Sequences
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (2002) 535–544 www.academicpress.com Phylogenetic analysis of anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) inferred from nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) sequences Peter H.H. Weekers,a,* Gopal Murugan,a,1 Jacques R. Vanfleteren,a Denton Belk,b and Henri J. Dumonta a Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium b Biology Department, Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA Received 20 February 2001; received in revised form 18 June 2002 Abstract The nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) of 27 anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) belonging to 14 genera and eight out of nine traditionally recognized families has been sequenced and used for phylogenetic analysis. The 18S rDNA phylogeny shows that the anostracans are monophyletic. The taxa under examination form two clades of subordinal level and eight clades of family level. Two families the Polyartemiidae and Linderiellidae are suppressed and merged with the Chirocephalidae, of which together they form a subfamily. In contrast, the Parartemiinae are removed from the Branchipodidae, raised to family level (Parartemiidae) and cluster as a sister group to the Artemiidae in a clade defined here as the Artemiina (new suborder). A number of morphological traits support this new suborder. The Branchipodidae are separated into two families, the Branchipodidae and Ta- nymastigidae (new family). The relationship between Dendrocephalus and Thamnocephalus requires further study and needs the addition of Branchinella sequences to decide whether the Thamnocephalidae are monophyletic. Surprisingly, Polyartemiella hazeni and Polyartemia forcipata (‘‘Family’’ Polyartemiidae), with 17 and 19 thoracic segments and pairs of trunk limb as opposed to all other anostracans with only 11 pairs, do not cluster but are separated by Linderiella santarosae (‘‘Family’’ Linderiellidae), which has 11 pairs of trunk limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Zooplankton Community Dynamics in Temporary Mediterranean Wetlands: Which Drivers Are Controlling the Seasonal Species Replacement?
    water Article Zooplankton Community Dynamics in Temporary Mediterranean Wetlands: Which Drivers Are Controlling the Seasonal Species Replacement? Juan Diego Gilbert 1, Inmaculada de Vicente 2, Fernando Ortega 1 and Francisco Guerrero 1,3,* 1 Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Campus de Las Lagunillas s/n., 23071 Jaén, Spain; [email protected] (J.D.G.); [email protected] (F.O.) 2 Departamento de Ecología, Campus de Fuentenueva s/n., 18071 Granada, Spain; [email protected] 3 Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias de la Tierra, Energía y Medio Ambiente, Campus de las Lagunillas s/n., 23071 Jaén, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Temporary Mediterranean wetlands are characterized by both intra and interannual varia- tions in their environmental conditions. These inherent fluctuations in limnological features affect the seasonal variation in the structure and dynamics of the aquatic communities. In this study, we hypothesized that zooplankton community is coupled to seasonal changes of the environmental variables along the hydroperiod. To get this purpose, the study was focused in monitoring, by collecting monthly samples during an annual period, seven temporary Mediterranean ponds lo- cated in the south-eastern region of the Iberian Peninsula (Alto Guadalquivir region, Andalusia). The relationships between zooplankton community and the different limnological variables were analyzed based on two approaches: a Spearman correlation analysis and a correspondence canonical Citation: Gilbert, J.D.; de Vicente, I.; analysis (CCA). The results have shown that chlorophyll-a concentration, Secchi depth, total nitrogen Ortega, F.; Guerrero, F. Zooplankton concentration, wetland area and depth were the variables with a greater influence on the zooplankton Community Dynamics in Temporary community, explaining the zooplankton species replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurosecretion in Chirocephalus Diaphanus Prevost the (Anostraca)
    NEUROSECRETION IN CHIROCEPHALUS DIAPHANUS PREVOST THE (ANOSTRACA). I. ANATOMY AND CYTOLOGY OF NEUROSECRETORY SYSTEM BY P. S. LAKE Department of Zoology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Great Britain 1) A considerable body of knowledge has been accumulated about the anatomy and cytology of the neurosecretory systems of malacostracan crustaceans, especially the Decapoda (Gabe, 1966). In contrast to the wealth of data available on neuro- secretion in the Malacostraca, the study of neurosecretion in the entomostracan groups has been largely neglected. Neurosecretion in the Anostraca has been studied by Lochhead & Resner (1958), Menon (1962) and Hentschel (1963, 1965 ) . In Artemia salina (L.) and Eubran- chipus sp., Lochhead & Resner (1958) reported the existence of neurosecretory cells in the brain, especially the protocerebrum, and in the suboesophageal gang- lion. Menon (1962) working with a species of StreptocePhalus reported finding two types of neurosecretory cells in the brain and circumoesophageal commissures. Neurosecretory structures, "the dorsal frontal organs", and a possible neurosecre- tory structure, "the ventral frontal organ" were located. A neurohaemal organ, the sinus gland, was found on the dorsal side of the optic peduncle. Hentschel (1963, 1965) identified four types of neurosecretory cells in the brain of Chiro- cephalus grubei Dybowski, and three types of secretory cells in the brain of Artemia .ralina. A "sinus" gland was identified in the optic peduncle of both species. In the gnaphocephalic, thoracic and abdominal ganglia of both species, he identified three types of neurosecretory cells. The structure of the neurosecretory system of the cladocerans, Dapbnia pulex (L.), Daphnia magna Straus and Simocephalus vetulus (0. F. M311er) has been studied by Sterba (1957).
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist and Distribution of Large Branchiopods (Branchiopoda: Anostraca, Notostraca, Spinicaudata) in Tunisia
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 31 (2016): 27–53 Updated checklist and distribution of large branchiopods (Branchiopoda: Anostraca, Notostraca, Spinicaudata) in Tunisia FEDERICO MARRONE1,*, MICHAEL KORN2, FABIO STOCH3, LUIGI NASELLI- FLORES1, SOUAD TURKI4 1 Dept. STEBICEF, University of Palermo, via Archirafi, 18, I-90123 Palermo, Italy 2 Limnological Institute, University of Konstanz, Mainaustr. 252, D-78464 Konstanz & DNA-Laboratory, Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, D- 01109 Dresden, Germany 3 Dept. of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, I-67100 Coppito, L'Aquila, Italy 4 Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Rue du 02 mars 1934, 28, T-2025 Salammbô, Tunisia * e-mail corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: Branchinectella media, fauna of Maghreb, freshwater crustaceans, Mediterranean temporary ponds, regional biodiversity. SUMMARY Temporary ponds are the most peculiar and representative water bodies in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world, where they often represent diversity hotspots that greatly contribute to the regional biodiversity. Being indissolubly linked to these ecosystems, the so-called “large branchiopods” are unanimously considered flagship taxa of these habitats. Nonetheless, updated and detailed information on large branchiopod faunas is still missing in many countries or regions. Based on an extensive bibliographical review and field samplings, we provide an updated and commented checklist of large branchiopods in Tunisia, one of the less investigated countries of the Maghreb as far as inland water crustaceans are concerned. We carried out a field survey from 2004 to 2012, thereby collecting 262 crustacean samples from a total of 177 temporary water bodies scattered throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanymastix Stagnalis Linn. and Its Occurrence in Norway
    Tanymastix stagnalis Linn. and its occurrence in Norway. BY Robert Gurney M. A. (Narfolk). In these days it is necessary to use much circumspection in refer- ring to any European species of Phyllopod, since so many changes have been made recently in their nomenclature. It is important, therefore, to make clear in the first instance to what species I am alluding and to justify its identification with the species described by Linnaeus. Now Linnaeus, in his Fauna Suecica, describes one species only of Branchipodidae under the name of Cancer stagnalis, and, in his Systema Naturae, he gives as a synonym of it Schaeffer's ,,Apus pisciformis"l). The description given is inadequate to determine by itself to what species he refers, with the exception that the colour of the egg-sac as there given is certainly not the same as in Schaeffers's species'). We have the authority of Prof. Lilljeborg that one species of Branchipod occurs commonly near Upsala and that this species is not the same as that described by Schaeffer, which is not known to occur in Sweden at all. We have therefore this dilemma; - Either Linnaeus overlooked a rather conspicuous animal which was common in his own neighbourhood and, in place of it, recorded as a member of the Swedish fauna a species which does not occur in Sweden; or he was in error in supposing that the two species described by himself and by Schaeffer were identical. Such an error as the latter is by no means unusual, whereas the first alternative seems to me incredible.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn Populations of Branchinecta Orientalis G. O. Sars, 1903 And
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 10 (2): 435-437 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2014 Article No.: 142301 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Autumn populations of Branchinecta orientalis G. O. Sars, 1903 and Chirocephalus diaphanus Prévost, 1803 (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) in the Central European Lowlands (Pannonian Plain, Serbia) Marko ŠĆIBAN1, Aleksandar MARKOVIĆ2, Dunja LUKIĆ2 and Dragana MILIČIĆ3 1. Bird Protection and Study Society of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia. 2. Society for Biological Research “Sergej D. Matvejev”, Belgrade, Serbia. 3. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Belgrade, Serbia. *Corresponding author, D. Miličić, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 23. October 2013 / Accepted: 12. February 2014 / Available online: 27. March 2014 / Printed: December 2014 Abstract. Autumn populations of two large branchiopod species, Branchinecta orientalis and Chirocephalus diaphanus in the area of southern part of Central European Lowlands (Pannonian Plain) are here reported for the first time. During surveys carried out in 2007–2013, autumn populations were observed in November 2009 (C. diaphanus) and in October 2012 (B. orientalis). Autumn specimens were smaller compared to those caught in spring. Although the two species were found in the same area, their habitats were spatially separated: B. orientalis was recorded only in the soda lake Rusanda, while C. diaphanus was found only in small ephemeral ponds placed over the surrounding meadows. Appearance of autumn populations point to the ecologically tolerant character of these species, and suggests they are able to tolerate lower temperatures during growth. Key words: B. orientalis, C. diaphanus, autumn populations, Pannonian Plain, Serbia. Occurrence of large branchiopod crustaceans is Romania (Demeter & Stoicescu 2008), Hungary highly correlated with type of habitat and climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Anostraca
    Hydmbwlogia 298: 315-353, 1995. D. Belk, H. J. Dumont & G. Maier (eds). Studies on Large Branchiopod Biology and Aquaculture II. 315 ©1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in Belgium. Checklist of the Anostraca Denton Belk^ & Jan Brtek^ ^ Biology Department, Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78207-4666, USA ^Hornonitrianske Muzeum, Hlinkova 44, Prievidza 971 01, Slovakia Key words: Anostraca, checklist, distribution, nomenclature, nomina dubia, nomina nuda, types, type locality Abstract In this checklist, we number the named anostracan fauna of the world at 258 species and seven subspecies organized in 21 genera. The list contains all species described through 31 December 1993, and those new species names made available in previous pages of this volume. The most species rich genus is Streptocephalus with 58 described species level taxa. Chirocephalus with 43, Branchinecta 35, and Branchinella 33 occupy the next three places. With the exception of Branchipodopsis and Eubranchipus each having 16 species, all the other genera include less than 10 species each. The need for zoogeographic study of these animals is demonstrated by the fact that almost 25% of the named taxa are known only from their type localities. Introduction requirements of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature for availability as species names. We present a complete listing of species in the crus­ This checklist recognizes 258 species and seven tacean order Anostraca as of 31 December 1993, and subspecies arranged in 21 genera; however, its authors those described in the preceding pages of this sympo­ disagree on the number of valid genera. The check­ sium volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Large Branchiopods in Portugal: an Update of Their Distribution
    Limnetica, 36 (2): 567-584 (2017). DOI: 10.23818/limn.36.22 Limnetica, 29 (2): x-xx (2011) c Asociación Ibérica de Limnología, Madrid. Spain. ISSN: 0213-8409 Freshwater large branchiopods in Portugal: an update of their distribution Margarida Machado1, Luís Cancela da Fonseca3,4 and Margarida Cristo1,2,∗ 1 CCMAR - Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portu- gal. 2 FCT - Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal. 3 MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Laboratório Marítimo da Guia, Av. N. Sra. do Cabo, 939, 750-374, Portugal. 4 CTA - Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias da Água, Universidade do Algarve Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal. ∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Received: 31/10/16 Accepted: 12/05/17 ABSTRACT Freshwater large branchiopods in Portugal: an update of their distribution This study is based largely on 20 years of field and laboratory work, with surveys conducted by the authors and some other researchers. During this period several studies dealing with freshwater large branchiopods (FLB) were carried out, resulting in scientific publications and project reports. The distribution of FLB in Portugal was presented in 2 international scientific meetings, but apart from a first paper by Vianna-Fernandes in 1951 and an update done by ourselves in 1999 concerning the southwest Portugal, no other information has been published. Therefore, this work intends to bring up to date the known distribution of this faunal group in freshwater temporary systems. This is pertinent because of the recent revision of the taxon Triops cancriformis on the basis of genetic analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Strategies in Populations of Chirocephalus Diaphanus (Crustacea, Anostraca) from Temporary Waters in the Reatine Apennines (Central Italy)
    J. Limnol., 62(1): 35-40, 2003 Adaptive strategies in populations of Chirocephalus diaphanus (Crustacea, Anostraca) from temporary waters in the Reatine Apennines (Central Italy) Graziella MURA*, Giovanni FANCELLO and Secondina DI GIUSEPPE Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell'Uomo, Università "La Sapienza", Viale dell'Università 32, 00185 Roma, Italy *e-mail corresponding author:[email protected] ABSTRACT To investigate the relationship between the adaptive strategies of Chirocephalus diaphanus (Crustacea, Anostraca) and the envi- ronmental characteristics of its habitat, we studied two populations living in high-altitude biotopes with very different characteris- tics, i.e. a semipermanent pool (Tilia Lake) and a temporary one (Illica Plain Pool), and we examined the essential features of their biological cycles (growth rate, reproductive biology, sex ratio and life cycle). The results show that the two populations adjust to the biotopes in which they live, fully exploiting the brief period available for development, in agreement with hypotheses formulated in studies of other colonizers of temporary environments. The strategy adopted by the Chirocephalus diaphanus population of Tilia Lake, a predictable and relatively constant environment, is similar to the k type, characterized by slow growth, late reproduction and a long life cycle. In contrast, the Illica Plain population presents rapid growth, precocious reproduction and a short life cycle, since it is highly dependent on the precariousness and unpredictability of the pool in which it lives. Key words: Anostraca, Chirocephalus diaphanus, life history, temporary waters, environmetal diversity, adaptive strategies perature range in which it normally lives is very wide 1. INTRODUCTION (5-26 °C) (Nourisson 1964), and there are occasional The life cycle of organisms, in its phenotypic ex- records of it in pools covered by a thick layer of ice pressions, represents a series of selective compromises (Hall 1961) or at temperatures above 30 °C (Mura imposed by different environmental variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to This Module
    MODULE 9: ADVANCED IDENTIFICATION OF MISCELLANEOUS TAXA INCLUDING CRUSTACEA - BY TERRY GLEDHILL AND IAN WALLACE Introduction to this module To include: Crustacea (with tips on the identification of zooplankton), freshwater arachnids, Bryozoa, Lepidoptera and Megaloptera and Neuroptera. This module provides guidance on the very important groups of Crustacean arthropods and also serves as a “catch- all” for some small, but fascinating invertebrate groups which do not warrant modules of their own. These are i) the water spiders and their relatives the freshwater mites (a large group which to date are difficult to identify, but which might prove important in water quality terms in the future, ii) the moss animals or Bryozoa, iii) the moths with aquatic larvae, iv) the alderflies, aquatic lacewings and spongeflies (N.B. alderflies were covered in module 2 and will only be given a brief mention here). As with the other modules, there are mandatory exercises which will be marked by your tutor. You can submit them by printing out this workbook and filling in the appropriate spaces by hand (but please add your name to the front of the workbook), or you can use the template appended to the introductory part and send completed exercises by email. Completion of this module will give you the Advanced Level for identification of miscellaneous taxa including Crustacea. Module 9: Version 2, December 2010 (Terry Gledhill and Ian Wallace) Page 2 of 68 SECTION 1: CRUSTACEA For this section you’ll need a copy of the following FBA Keys: British Freshwater Crustacea Malacostraca: a key with ecological notes (Gledhill et al., 1993); British Freshwater Cladocera (Scourfield & Harding, 1966); A Key to the British Freshwater Cyclopoid and Calanoid Copepods (Harding & Smith, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • A .PDF of This Paper
    BRANCHIOPOD DIVERSITY IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, USA MARIE A SIMOVICH, Biology Department. University of San Diego, and San Diego Natural History Museum, San D iego , CA 921/0 MiCHAEL FUGATE, Biology Department. University of California. Riverside. CA 92521 1992 TRANSAOlONS OF THE WESTERN SEalON OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY 28:6-/4 Abstract: Branchiopod crustaceans (fairy, clam. and tadpole shrimp) are common faunal elements in ephemeral aquatic habitats. All arc adapted to the temporary presence of water and to specific sets of environmental parameters (e.g., salinity. temperature, pH). These organisms arc often overlooked due to the limited time they and their habitat exists. San Diego County provides a diversity ofephemeral habitats ranging from coastal vernal pools to desert playas. However. only one branchiopod species has previously been reported from the area . Our studies have revealed a diverse fauna of four specie s of fairy shrimp in three families , three species of clam shrimp in two families, and one species of tadpole shrim p. Two of the fairy shrimp have range s almost entirely restricted to San Diego County and are threatened with extinction due to habitat loss. The tremendous loss of temporary aquatic habitats obs. and D. Belk, pers . comm.). The Conchostraca and worldwide has increased interest both in their unique and Notostraca have not been recently reviewed but are highly endemic flora and fauna and in their conservation represented by at least eightand four species, respectively (Jain 1976. Holland 1978. Dimentrnan 1981. Holland (Wootton and Mattox 1958, Lynch 1966 , Sassaman and Jain 1981. Herbst 1982. Jain and Moyle 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Branchiopoda, Copepoda, Ostracoda) from the Inland Waters of Fthiotida (Greece)
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 34 (2019): 87–99 On the non-malacostracan crustaceans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda, Copepoda, Ostracoda) from the inland waters of Fthiotida (Greece) FEDERICO MARRONE1,*, MARCO ARCULEO1, CHRISTOS GEORGIADIS2,3, FABIO STOCH4 1 University of Palermo, Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), via Archirafi 18, 90123 Palermo (Italy) 2 Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, (United Arab Emirates) 3 Section of Zoology – Marine Biology, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Zografou (Greece) 4 Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels (Belgium) * corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: Arctodiaptomus alpinus, Cross-taxon congruence, Diaptomus cf. serbicus, Leptestheria dahalacensis, Temporary ponds, Wlassicsia pannonica. SUMMARY In the frame of the activities of the LIFE11 NAT/GR/1014 ForOpenForests, some water bodies occurring in the "Ethnikos Drymos Oitis” (GR2440004) and “Oros Kallidromo” (GR2440006) (Sterea Ellada) were investigated with the aim of providing a first census of the composition and diversity of their crustacean fauna. Overall, the sampling of 15 water bodies (7 of them listed as “Mediterranean temporary ponds” sensu EU “Habitats Directive”) led to the finding of 13 branchiopod, 11 copepod, and 7 ostracod taxa, including 4 species new for mainland Greece,
    [Show full text]