Employment Conditions and Health Inequalities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Employment Conditions and Health Inequalities Employment Conditions and Health Inequalities Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) Employment Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET) Joan Benach, Carles Muntaner, Vilma Santana (Chairs) Health Inequalities Research Group Occupational Health Research Unit Dept. Experimental Sciences and Health Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Social Equity and Health Section Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil Employm ent Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET). Final Report, 20 September 2007 2 Employm ent Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET). Final Report, 20 September 2007 Employment Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET) Joan Benach, Carles Muntaner, Vilma Santana (Chairs) Report Writing Group Marcelo Amable, Paula Ballell, Joan Benach, Antía Castedo, Haejoo Chung, Yucel Demiral, Gerry Eijkemans, Katherine Lippel, Carles Muntaner, Michael Quinlan, Javier Ramos, Vilma Santana, Atanu Sarkar, Orielle Solar EMCONET Core Group Francisco Armada, Joan Benach, Antía Castedo, Yucel Demiral, Chamberlain Diala, Magdalena Echevarría, Gerry Eijkemans, Sharon Friel, Anne Hammarström, Mary Haour-Knipe, Carles Muntaner, Shengli Niu, Marco A. Pérez, Michael Quinlan, Javier Ramos, Hernán Sandoval, Vilma Santana, Atanu Sarkar, Amit Sen Gupta, Meera Sethi, Orielle Solar, Walter Varillas, Laurent Vogel, Mariana Wagner EMCONET Participants Members who have contributed with case studies (see list below) General Editor Jacqueline Murray With Technical Assistance from Marcelo Amable, María Buxó, Alec Irwin, José Miguel Martínez, Vanessa Puig, Cecilia Schneider, Montserrat Vergara Organisational and Administrative Assistance Antía Castedo, Montse Fernández, Montse Vilà, Mariana Wagner 3 Employm ent Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET). Final Report, 20 September 2007 AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS Chairs Joan Benach (Chair). Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Carles Muntaner (co-Chair). Social Equity and Health Section, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Vilma Santana (co-Chair). Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Report Writing Group Marcelo Amable. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Paula Ballell. Independent Consultant. Brussels, Belgium. Joan Benach. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Antía Castedo. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Haejoo Chung. Department of Health Policy and Management. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. MD, US Yucel Demiral. Dokuz Eylül. University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health. Izmir. Turkey. Gerry Eijkemans. Occupational Health Programme. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Katherine Lippel. Law Department, Université du Québec à Montréal, and Faculty of Law (Civil Law Section), University of Ottawa. Canada. Carles Muntaner. Social Equity and Health Section, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Michael Quinlan. School of Industrial Relations and Organizational Behaviour, University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia. Javier Ramos. Global Progressive Forum. Brussels , Belgium. Vilma Santana. Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador Bahia, Brazil. Atanu Sarkar. Department of Policy Studies, TERI University. New Delhi, India. Orielle Solar. WHO Department of Equity, Poverty and Social Determinants of Health (EIP/EQH). Commission on Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. EMCONET core group Francisco Armada. Escuela de Altos Estudios Arnaldo Gabaldón. Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Salud, Ministry of Health, Caracas, Venezuela. Joan Benach. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Antía Castedo. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Yucel Demiral. Dokuz Eylül. University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health. Izmir. Turkey. Chamberlain Diala. Abt Associates. Social Change Group of the Academy for Educational Development (AED), Washington D.C. USA. Magdalena Echevarría. Advisor Ministry of Labour, Santiago de Chile, Chile. Gerry Eijkemans. Occupational Health Programme. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Sharon Friel. Secretariat. Commission Social Determinants of Health. University College London, UK. Anne Hammarström. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine. Umea University, Umea, Sweden. Mary Haour-Knipe. Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland. 4 Employm ent Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET). Final Report, 20 September 2007 Carles Muntaner. Social Equity and Health Section, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Shengli Niu. Occupational Safety and Health Branch. International Labour Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. Marco Perez, Ministry of Health, Technical Area of Workers’ Health, Brazil. Michael Quinlan. School of Industrial Relations and Organizational Behaviour, University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia. Javier Ramos. Global Progressive Forum. Brussels, Belgium. Hernán Sandoval. Representative Commissioners, Commission Social Determinants of Health. Santiago Chile, Chile. Vilma Santana. Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil Atanu Sarkar. Department of Policy Studies, TERI University. New Delhi, India. Amit Sen Gupta. People’s Health Movement. New Delhi, India Meera Sethi. Senior Regional Advisor for Sub-Saharan Africa. International Organization for Migrations. Geneva: Switzerland. Orielle Solar. WHO Department of Equity, Poverty and Social Determinants of Health (EIP/EQH). Commission on Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Walter Varillas. Independent Consultant on Occupational Health and Local Development, and ISAT. Lima, Perú. Laurent Vogel. European Trade Union Technical Bureau for Health and Safety, ETUI-REHS, Researcher, Brussels, Belgium. Mariana Wagner. Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador Bahia, Brazil. EMCONET participants Case studies Lucía Artazcoz. Public Health Agency of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Mary Bauer. Immigrant Justice Project, The Southern Poverty Law Center. Montgomery, Alabama, USA Joan Benach. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Fernando G. Benavides. Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. Carme Borrell. Public Health Agency of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Barbara Briggs. National Labor Committee in Support of Human and Worker Rights, New York, USA. Antía Castedo. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Teresa Castellà. Gabinet Higia Salut i Treball (Higia Work and Health), Catalan CC.OO. Union, Lleida, Spain. Jean Marc Caudron. Oxfam-Magasins du Monde, Brussels, Belgium. Tarani Chandola. International Institute for Society and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK. Haejoo Chung. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. MD, US. Marlea Clarke. Labour Studies Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Joan Eakin. Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto. Ontario, Canada. Amanda Fortier. Journalists for Human Rights, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Jenny Head. International Institute for Society and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK. Charles Kernaghan. National Labor Committee in Support of Human and Worker Rights, New York, USA. Denis Lambert. Oxfam-Magasins du Monde, Brussels, Belgium. Paul A. Landsbergis. Department of Community and Preventive Medicine. Mount Sinai School of Medicine. New York, US. Wayne Lewchuk. Labour Studies Program & Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. Canada. 5 Employm ent Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET). Final Report, 20 September 2007 Clara Llorens. Union Institute of Work Environment and Health, ISTAS, Spanish CC.OO. Union, Barcelona, Spain. Dana Loomis. University of Nevada, Reno Nevada, USA. José Miguel Martínez. Health Inequalities Research Group, Occupational Health Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Maria Menéndez. Occupational Health Department,
Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Peoples' Access to Decent Work and Social
    INTER-AGENCY SUPPORT GROUP ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ ISSUES THEMATIC PAPER towards the preparation of the 2014 World Conference on Indigenous Peoples INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ ACCESS TO DECENT WORK AND SOCIAL PROTECTION JUNE 2014 Thematic Paper on Indigenous Peoples’ Access to Decent Work and Social Protection The United Nations Inter-Agency Support Group (IASG) on Indigenous Issues aims to strengthen cooperation and coordination among UN agencies, funds, entities and programmes on indigenous peoples’ issues and to support the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. It also seeks to promote the effective participation of indigenous peoples in relevant international processes. At its annual meeting held in October 2013, the IASG decided to develop a set of collaborative thematic papers to serve as background information and analysis on key issues to contribute to the process and preparations for the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples. The preparation of each paper was led by one or more agencies with inputs from other IASG members. The papers do not present or represent formal, official UN policy positions. Rather, they reflect the collective efforts of the Inter-Agency Support Group to highlight selected key issues and to provide substantive materials to inform the Conference, with a view to contributing to the realization of the rights of indigenous peoples. *The chair of the IASG rotates annually amongst the participating agencies. The Support Group has been chaired by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) until the end of the 13th session of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues in May 2014. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is currently holding the chair of the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • How Inequality Defines Women's Work in Asia
    OXFAM ISSUE BRIEFING JUNE 2016 Factory workers step out of their shuttle bus as their shift ends. Hlaing Thar Yar Industrial Zone, Yangon, November 2015. Photo: Kaung Htet/Oxfam UNDERPAID AND UNDERVALUED: HOW INEQUALITY DEFINES WOMEN’S WORK IN ASIA Rising economic inequality across Asia is threatening poverty reduction and slowing down the fight against gender inequality. Although the region has experienced economic growth, the bottom 70 percent have seen their income share fall while the share for the top 10 percent has increased rapidly. Low wages and a lack of rights at work, particularly for women, are at the heart of this scandal. At the same time, women are subsidizing the economy with a disproportionate responsibility for unpaid care work. Achieving living wages and recognizing, redistributing and reducing unpaid care work could support both economic and gender equality in Asia and should be prioritized by both governments and businesses. www.oxfam.org 1 INTRODUCTION For women across Asia, access to decent work and a living wage represents a fundamental pathway out of poverty, and one of the best ways to counter the dangerous tide of growing economic inequality. Yet in recent decades, working people, in rich and poor countries alike, have received a smaller and smaller slice of the economic pie, while those who own capital have seen their assets grow disproportionately. Low wages for the majority of people, and particularly for women, are at the heart of this scandal. At the same time, women continue to carry out the majority of unpaid care and domestic work, which is essential to keep economies functioning but is unrecognized and undermined in policy making.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating New Data to Assess Risks of Forced Labour in Agriculture India Country Methodology for Pilot
    Integrating new data to assess risks of forced labour in agriculture India Country Methodology for Pilot Report produced for the ISEAL Alliance Innovations Fund project “Integrating new data to improve risk assessments and detection of forced labour vulnerability in agricultural supply chains” December 2018 Disclaimer This report should be taken only as a source of information and analysis. It is not given, and should not be taken, as legal advice and the provider Ergon Associates Ltd of the information will not be held liable for any direct or consequential Unit 1, 9A Dallington St. +44 20 7713 0386 loss arising from reliance on the information contained herein. London EC1V 0BQ ergonassociates.net Contents Executive Summary 3 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Key points on the India Country Indicator methodology .................................................................... 3 1.3 Turning root causes into indicators..................................................................................................... 3 1.4 How to use the indicator methodology ............................................................................................... 6 1.5 Key points on remediation options for India ...................................................................................... 7 2. Overview of project 9 2.1 Project background .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice, 1919–2009
    The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 Gerry Rodgers, Eddy Lee, Lee Swepston and Jasmien Van Daele INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2009 First published in paperback in 2009 by the International Labour Office, CH-1211, Geneva 22, Switzerland First published in hardback in 2009 by Cornell University Press, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, NY 14850, United States (available for sale in North America only) Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copy- right Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 Gerry Rodgers, Eddy Lee, Lee Swepston and Jasmien Van Daele International Labour Office. – Geneva: ILO, 2009 ISBN 978-92-2-121955-2 (paperback) ILO / role of ILO / ILO standard setting / tripartism / workers rights / quality of working life / social security / promotion of employment / poverty alleviation / decent work / history / trend 01.03.7 Also available in hardback: The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 (ISBN 978-0-8014-4849-2), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Stopping Forced Labour and Slavery-Like Practices the ILO Strategy
    Stopping forced labour and slavery-like practices The ILO strategy According to ILO’s most recent global estimate, there are at least 20.9 million victims of forced labour, trafficking and slavery in the world today. About 90 per cent of today’s forced labour is exacted in the private economy, primarily in labour intensive industries such as manufacturing, agriculture and food processing, fishing, domestic work and construction. While global interest in combating forced labour has grown exponentially in recent years, responses still fall far Our vision is that no short of addressing the full scale and scope of the problem. person, of any age, race, origin or religion, any- Forced labour affects the most vulnerable and least protected where, spends a day of people, perpetuating a vicious cycle of poverty and depend- his or her life working ency. Women, low-skilled migrant workers, children, indigenous under duress and suffer- peoples and other groups suffering discrimination on different ing degrading or inhu- grounds are disproportionally affected. ILO’s strategy seeks to man treatment. address root causes of forced labour both by empowering vul- nerable people to resist coercion at work and by addressing the factors that allow unscrupulous employers to profit from their exploitation. Eliminating forced labour is therefore an important contribution to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The overall goal of ILO’s strategy is a global reduction in forced labour and related practices of at least 30 per cent by 2015, equivalent to some 6 million fewer people trapped in work against their free will. In order to successfully achieve these goals, the ILO would require an annual allocation of 15 million US$ .
    [Show full text]
  • The International Labour Organization: a Handbook for Minorities and Indigenous Peoples
    The International Labour Organization: A Handbook for Minorities and Indigenous Peoples BY CHANDRA ROY AND MIKE KAYE THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION: Acknowledgements A HANDBOOK FOR MINORITIES AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Minority Rights Group International (MRG) and Anti-Slavery International gratefully acknowl- © Minority Rights Group International edges the support of the European Commission, and Anti-Slavery International 2002 the T.U.U.T Charitable Trust and the U.I.A. Char- All rights reserved. itable Foundation, and all of the organizations and individuals who Material from this publication may be reproduced for teaching or gave financial and other assistance for this publication. other non-commercial purposes. No part may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without the prior express permission of Minority Rights Group International and Anti-Slavery International the copyright holders. are grateful to all the staff and independent expert readers who For further information please contact MRG. contributed to this publication, in particular Chris Chapman (MRG A CIP catalogue record for this publication is available from the International Officer) and Katrina Payne (MRG Editor). British Library. This publication has been commissioned and is published by ISBN 1 8976 93 39 7 Minority Rights Group International and Anti-Slavery International Published May 2002 as a contribution to public understanding of the issue which forms Typeset by Kavita Graphics its subject. The text and views of the authors do not necessarily rep- Printed in the UK on bleach-free paper resent, in every detail and in all its aspects, the collective view of the two organizations. THE AUTHORS CHANDRA ROY is an international lawyer who helped establish the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO).
    [Show full text]
  • STANDARD GUIDANCE (COP 18) Forced Labour
    STANDARD GUIDANCE (COP 18) Forced Labour A. Definitions and applicability Forced labour is all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily. This includes work or service that is demanded as a means of repayment of debt. Types of forced labour can include: Bonded labour, also known as ‘debt bondage’, involves the taking of a loan or wage advance by a worker from an employer or labour recruiter, in return for which the worker pledges his or her labour and sometimes that of family members in order to repay the loan. The terms of the loan or work, however, may be such that the worker is trapped with that employer for years without being able to pay back the loan. Indentured labour arises when a third party, often a parent or guardian, offers a worker in exchange for a sum of money. In this situation, workers must work for either a defined period of time, or until the proprietors determine that they have received fair value. Prison labour: involuntary work performed by prisoners who have not been convicted in a court of law and whose work is not supervised by a public authority is considered forced labour. Similarly, involuntary work performed by a prisoner for the benefit of a private undertaking is also considered forced labour. Human trafficking is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability, or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor
    From Unknown to Known: Asking the Right Questions to The Story Behind Our Stuff Trace Abuses in Global Supply Chains DOWNLOAD ILAB’S COMPLY CHAIN AND APPS TODAY! Explore the key elements Discover of social best practice COMPLY CHAIN compliance 8 guidance Reduce child labor and forced systems 3 labor in global supply chains! 7 4 NEW! Explore more than 50 real 6 Assess risks Learn from world examples of best practices! 5 and impacts innovative in supply chains NEW! Discover topics like company responsible recruitment and examples worker voice! NEW! Learn to improve engagement with stakeholders on issues of social compliance! ¡Disponible en español! Disponible en français! Check Browse goods countries' produced with efforts to child labor or eliminate forced labor 1,000+ pages of research in child labor the palm of your hand! NEW! Examine child labor data on 131 countries! Review Find child NEW! Check out the Mexico laws and labor data country profile for the first time! ratifications NEW! Uncover details on 25 additions and 1 removal for the List of Goods! How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. On Your Computer All three of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor. These reports include Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005; and List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Economy
    Women and the economy 1. Global commitments This chapter of the Platform for Action is concerned with the obstacles faced by women in gaining equitable opportunities and rewards in economic participation. There are six strategic objectives. Promote women’s economic rights and independence, including access to employment, appropriate working conditions and control over economic resources. Facilitate women’s equal access to resources, employment, markets and trade. Provide business services, training and access to markets, information and technology, particularly to low-income women. Strengthen women’s economic capacity and commercial networks. Eliminate occupational segregation and all forms of employment discrimination. Promote harmonization of work and family responsibilities for women and men. Article 11 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) commits States parties to take “all appropriate measures to eliminate discrimination against women in the field of employment in order to ensure, on a basis of equality of men and women, the same rights”, and “to prevent discrimination against women on the grounds of marriage or maternity and to ensure their effective right to work.” The International Labour Organization (ILO) has adopted a number of Conventions of particular relevance to gender equality, in particular the four key gender equality Conventions. These are the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111), the Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100), the Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention, 1981 (No. 156) and the Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183). The Commission on the Status of Women continues to emphasize the importance of achieving equality in employment and economic activities.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Cover Contents
    July 26, 2011 u vol. 108 u no. 30 u 12187–12560 Cover image: Pictured is a Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii), a carnivorous marsupial whose numbers are dwindling due to an infectious facial cancer called Devil Facial Tumor Disease. Webb Miller et al. sequenced the genome of devils from northwest and south- east Tasmania, spanning the range of this threatened species on the Australian island. The authors report that the sequences reveal a worrisome dearth of genetic diversity among devils, suggesting the need for genetically characterized stocks to help breed hardier devils that might be better equipped to fight diseases. See the article by Miller et al. on pages 12348–12353. Image courtesy of Stephan C. Schuster. From the Cover 12348 Decoding the Tasmanian devil genome 12283 Illuminating chromosomal architecture 12295 Symmetry of cultured cells 12319 Caloric restriction and infertility 12366 Genetic diversity among ants Contents COMMENTARIES 12189 Methyl fingerprinting of the nucleosome reveals the molecular mechanism of high-mobility group THIS WEEK IN PNAS nucleosomal-2 (HMGN2) association Catherine A. Musselman and Tatiana G. Kutateladze See companion article on page 12283 12187 In This Issue 12191 Examining the establishment of cellular axes using intrinsic chirality LETTERS (ONLINE ONLY) Jason C. McSheene and Rebecca D. Burdine See companion article on page 12295 E341 Difference between restoring and predicting 3D 12193 Secrets of palm oil biosynthesis revealed structures of the loops in G-protein–coupled Toni Voelker receptors by molecular modeling See companion article on page 12527 Gregory V. Nikiforovich, Christina M. Taylor, Garland R. Marshall, and Thomas J. Baranski E342 Reply to Nikiforovich et al.: Restoration of the loop regions of G-protein–coupled receptors Dahlia A.
    [Show full text]
  • REAL-TIME IMAGING of NITRIC OXIDE (NO) SIGNALS DERIVED from DIFFERENTIALLY TARGETED ENDOTHELIAL NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASES (Enos) USING GENETICALLY ENCODED BIOSENSORS
    T.C. BIRUNI UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENETICS MOLECULAR AND MEDICAL GENETICS GRADUATE PROGRAM REAL-TIME IMAGING OF NITRIC OXIDE (NO) SIGNALS DERIVED FROM DIFFERENTIALLY TARGETED ENDOTHELIAL NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASES (eNOS) USING GENETICALLY ENCODED BIOSENSORS Mete Emir ÖZGÜRSES ADVISOR Asst. Prof. Dr. Emrah EROĞLU July, 2020 T.C. BIRUNI UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENETICS MOLECULAR AND MEDICAL GENETICS GRADUATE PROGRAM REAL-TIME IMAGING OF NITRIC OXIDE (NO) SIGNALS DERIVED FROM DIFFERENTIALLY TARGETED ENDOTHELIAL NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASES (eNOS) USING GENETICALLY ENCODED BIOSENSORS Mete Emir ÖZGÜRSES ADVISOR Asst. Prof. Dr. Emrah EROĞLU July, 2020 III DECLARATION I declare that I have designed and performed all experiments in the current study entitled “Real-time imaging of nitric oxide (NO) signals derived from differentially targeted endothelial nitric oxide synthases (eNOS) using genetically encoded biosensors” according to good scientific practices. I obtained all the information contained in this thesis under academic and ethical rules. All the information I have used from secondary literature has been respectively referenced. I also declare that have not violated any patents and copyrights during the preparation and writing of this thesis. Mete Emir Ozgurses IV To all human being, V ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my deepest gratitude to everyone who has supported me through this thesis. Firstly, I would like to thank Asst. Prof. Emrah Eroğlu for allowing me to work in his lab. He has guided me throughout the project both by challenging me to be more competent in science and by sharing his instructive ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor a Download Ilab’S Sweat & Toil and Comply Chain Apps Today!
    2018 LIST OF GOODS PRODUCED BY CHILD LABOR OR FORCED LABOR A DOWNLOAD ILAB’S SWEAT & TOIL AND COMPLY CHAIN APPS TODAY! Browse goods Check produced with countries' child labor or efforts to forced labor eliminate child labor Sweat & Toil See what governments 1,000+ pages can do to end of research in child labor the palm of Review laws and ratifications your hand! Find child labor data Explore the key Discover elements best practice of social guidance compliance systems Comply Chain 8 8 steps to reduce 7 3 4 child labor and 6 forced labor in 5 Learn from Assess risks global supply innovative and impacts company in supply chains chains. examples ¡Ahora disponible en español! Maintenant disponible en français! B BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR AFFAIRS How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. ON YOUR COMPUTER All three of the USDOL flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats, at www.dol.gov/endchildlabor. These reports include the Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; the List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126; and the List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005. On our website, you can navigate to individual country pages, where you can find information on the prevalence and sectoral distribution of the worst forms of child labor in the country, specific goods produced by child labor or forced labor in the country, the legal framework on child labor, enforcement of laws related to child labor, coordination of government efforts on child labor, government policies related to child labor, social programs to address child labor, and specific suggestions for government action to address the issue.
    [Show full text]