DOCSLIB.ORG

Site Specific Safety Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site Specific Safety Policy Site Specific Safety Policy [Project Name] [Project Location] Prepared for: [Client] [Address] [City, State/Province, Zip./Postal Code] [Month XX, 20XX] Industrial Site / Project No.: [00000.00] Plan Expiration Date: [insert date 1 year from approval date] THIS SH&E PLAN IS TO BE USED FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT. THIS PLAN MUST BE REVISED AS APPROPRIATE TO ADDRESS CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS OR MODIFIED SCOPE OF WORK. Disclaimer: This SH&E Plan, and each of its provisions, is applicable only to, and for use only by, AECOM, its affiliates, and its subcontractors. Any use of this Plan by other parties, including, without limitation, third party contractors on industrial sites or projects where AECOM is providing engineering, construction management or similar services, without the express written permission of AECOM, will be at that party's sole risk, and AECOM Corporation shall have no responsibility therefore. The existence and use of this Plan by AECOM shall not be deemed an admission or evidence of any acceptance of any safety responsibility by AECOM for other parties unless such responsibility is expressly assumed in writing by AECOM in a specific project contract. AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 1 of 38 SH&E Plan Approval Page By signing below, I acknowledge that I have reviewed and hereby approve the SH&E Plan for the [insert industrial site or project name ]. This SH&E Plan has been written for the exclusive use of AECOM, its employees, and its subcontractors. Prepared by: [Preparer’s Name] Date [Preparer’s Title] [Preparer’s Phone Number] Reviewed by: [Safety Prof Name] Date [Safety Prof Title] [Safety Prof Phone Number] Approved by: [Proj Mgr Name] Date Program/Project Manager [Proj Mgr Phone Number] These Project Safety Requirements are intended to present a comprehensive approach to compliance with all applicable safety standards, regulations & codes and to lessen the potential for accidents, injuries and illnesses on this project. However, it does not purport to address all potential safety concerns that might occur during construction. Therefore, the Construction Manager reserves the right to amend, add and/or delete any provision contained herein to enhance safety compliance. Any and all such changes shall be recognized and complied with by site contractors. AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 2 of 38 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this Safety, Health, and Environmental (SH&E) Plan is to address health and safety concerns related to AECOM managed activities at the [ site name ] site, located at [ site address ] in [ city, state ]. The specific roles, responsibilities, authority, and requirements as they pertain to the safety of employees and the scope of services are discussed herein. The document is intended to present a comprehensive approach to compliance with all applicable safety standards, regulations & codes and to lessen the potential for accidents, injuries and illnesses on this project. However, it does not to address all potential safety concerns that might occur during construction. Therefore, AECOM reserves the right to amend, add and/or delete any provision contained herein to enhance safety compliance. Any and all such changes shall be recognized and complied with by site contractors and their workers. Concurrence with the provisions of this SH&E Plan is mandatory for all personnel working at the site and must be evidenced by each individual signing the acknowledgement page of the Project Orientation. [Insert brief scope of services and responsible party ] AECOM HUNT will be9 Subcontractor : will be9 Subcontractor Y will be9 The primary physical ha5ards that may be encountered include2 [list P1I-A1Y physical ha5ards & The chemical ha5ards that may be encountered include2 [list anticipated chemical ha5ards & All subcontractors are bound by the provisions of this S &E Plan and are should understand the anticipated ha5ards and respective onsite controls. The discussion will cover the entire S &E Plan subject matter, putting emphasis on critical elements of the plan; such as the emergency response procedures, personal protective e4uipment, site control strategies, and monitoring re4uirements. In addition, subcontractor will conduct daily tailgate safety meetings to discuss their anticipated scope of work, re4uired controls, incident reporting, and any lessons learned or concerns from the previous day; to identify new ha5ards and controls; and to review the results of inspections. AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 3 of 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 E-E1GENCY C,NTACTS & FACIAITIES INF,1-ATI,N 6 2.0 AEC,-.S SAFETY F,1 AIFE & AIFE P1ESE1CING P1INCIPAES 7 3.0 INT1,08CTI,N 8 3.1 0efinitions E 3.2 1egulatory 1e4uirements 10 3.3 AECOM Safety Plan -anagement 1esponsibilities 11 3.4 AECOM Employees. Safety 1esponsibilitie 15 3.5 Subcontractor Safety Plan -anagement 1esponsibilities 15 4.0 S8BC,NT1ACT,1 SAFETY 1ESP,NSIBIAITIES 17 4.1 Pre Construction Phase Activities. 17 4.2 Construction Phase Activities 17 4.3 Environmental Controls 1E 5.0 SITE 0ESC1IPTI,N AN0 PAANNE0 G,1H ,PE1ATI,NS 20 5.1 General 0escription 20 5.2 Planned Gork ,perations 20 6.0 P1,IECT SAFETY & EAAT 1EJ8I1E-ENTS 21 6.1 Site-Specific Safety Training 21 6.2 Tailgate -eetings 21 6.3 a5ard Communication 21 6.4 a5ardous, Solid, or -unicipal Gaste 21 6.5 General Safety 1ules 21 6.6 ousekeeping 22 6.7 Smoking, Eating, or 0rinking 22 6.8 Personal Protective E4uipment 22 6.E Personal ygiene 23 6.10 Air -onitoring 24 6.11 Stop Gork Authority 25 6.12 Client Specific Safety 1e4uirements 25 6.13 ,S A Partnership 25 6.15 Safety 1ecognition Program 25 6.16 Project Safety Committie 26 6.17 Contractor Specific ,rienation 26 6.18 Project Specifc ,rientation 26 6.1E Cisitors & Cendors 26 6.20 Safety 1esponsibilites & Incidnet Prevention 27 6.21 Task a5ard Assessment ,verview 28 6.22 Fall Protection Policy 28 7.0 S8BSTANCE AB8SE 2E 7.1 0ISCIPAINA1Y ACTI,N 30 7.2 E-PA,YEE C,N08CT 31 8.0 C,NT1ACT,1 -,NT AY 1EP,1TING 32 8.1 AEC,- AifeGuard 32 8.2 1e4uired -onthly Submittals 32 8.3 Contractor monthly report 32 AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 4 of 38 Personnel Acknowledgement 33 Attachments Attachment A AECOM S &E Policy Attachment B AECOM CS-BC Corporate Safety -anual Attachment C Aocation Specific Emergency 1esponse Plan Attachment 0 Contractor Safety Performance 1e4uirements Attachment E :::::::::::::: AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 5 of 38 1.0 Emergency Contacts & Facilities Information This S &E Plan addresses the re4uirements for AEC,- and subcontractor personnel to conduct field activities to support the [Industrial Site or Project Name, Scope of Gork, and Aocation &. Emergency Coordinators / Key Personnel Name Title/Workstation Telephone Number Mobile Phone [insert& CP Field ,perations [insert& [insert& [insert& Project 0Irector [insert& [insert& [insert& General Supintendent [insert& [insert& [insert& S &E Sr. P- [insert& [insert& [insert& Site Safety -anager [insert& [insert& Medical Treatment Facilities Telephone Days/Hours of Name Address Number Operation EMERGENCY - [insert& [insert& [insert& [ ,SPITAA insert& NON-EMERGENCY [,CC8PATI,NAA [insert& [insert& [insert& CAINIC insert& A complete Aocation Specific Emergency 1eponse Plan is provided in Appendi) A. [Complete S3NA-010- F-2 and attach in Appendi) A.& AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 6 of 38 2.0 AECOM’s Safety for Life & Life Preserving Principles Safety for AifeL is a comprehensive internal program that drives our nearly 100,000 employees toward the company.s commitment to achieving 5ero work-related injuries and3or illnesses; preventing damage to property and the environment; and maintaining an environmentally friendly and sustainable workplace. ,ur Safety for Aife program is supported by E Aife Preserving Principles that apply to all AEC,- activities. AECOM CS-BC Site Specific Safety Plan Project 7 of 38 3.0 Introduction This S &E Plan addresses the re4uirements for AECOM subcontractor personnel to conduct field activities to support the [Industrial Site or Project Name, Scope of Gork, and Aocation &. • The re4uirements of this S &E Plan apply to AECOM subcontractor-managed operations only. No change to this S &E Plan that could affect the health or safety of personnel, the community, or the environment may be made without prior approval of the AECOM -anager and the S &E -anager. Concurrence with the provisions of this S &E Plan is mandatory for all personnel at the site covered by this plan and must be evidenced by each individual signing the acknowledgement page of this plan. • These 1e4uirements are not an attempt to reiterate the numerous applicable regulations, standards, and laws that contractors are bound to comply with in achieving a safe and healthful workplace. ,S A standards and those higher standards specifically identified herein are minimum re4uirements. This program is intended to be a supplement to enumerate re4uirements that raise the level of safety and clarify and highlight certain re4uirements with the intent of achieving the safest possible workplace. Contractors and their employees must understand what is re4uired of them because they are accountable for maintaining a safe Project. Nothing contained in this Contractor Safety Performance 1e4uirement documents is intended to relieve any contractor of the obligations assumed by them under their contract with the ,wner3 unt Construction Group, Inc. or as re4uired jurisdictions having authority. • Each contractor and its employees have the e)plicit responsibility to provide a safe workplace and follow safe work practices at all times. The Construction -anager Safety 1epresentative and the Construction -anager.s staff have the responsibility to foster an Environment and Culture to assist contractors to achieve these 1e4uirements of these Construction Safety Performance 1e4uirements. • The document is meant to achieve the goal for being the performance of a safe work environment and safe work practices by the contractor for their employees, visitors, vendors, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Controlling Brewery Hazards: Hierarchy of Control
    Master Brewers Safety Toolbox Talk Controlling Brewery Hazards: Hierarchy of Control Hazards are those things that can harm us. They include longer term harm, like exposure to a chemical, which doesn’t show up for years, or the harm can be immediate, like a severe burn. We control the hazard to prevent harm. Potential harm includes potential serious injury or fatality—a brewery burn is one example. While not everyone is burned by hot wort, the potential is always present. Burns can be minor, such as reddened skin, or serious injuries can occur, like those received by an electrician a few years ago when a kettle of hot wort boiled over (Lasbury, 2021). Control of hazards is critical. Recognition is key. It is important to be able to recognize hazards. Studies have found that workers typically fail to identify more than 55% of hazards in their immediate work environment (Albert et al., 2017). If I don’t recognize a hazard, I won’t protect myself from it. Thorough hazard assessments are necessary to identify hazards. Once identified, controls are determined. The most effective controls provide the most effective protections. If the best controls were in use, we wouldn’t be hearing about injuries in breweries. The hierarchy of control has six levels of control. Each level provides an increased level of protection compared to the level below it. The controls are elimination, substitution, isolation, engineering, administrative, and personal protective equipment (PPE). The higher up in the hierarchy the control is, the more protection it typically can provide from hazards. Administrative controls and PPE are controls that can provide some protection from hazards, but alone they may not provide enough protection.
    [Show full text]
  • A Risk Assessment of Human-Robot Interface Operations To
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Minds@University of Wisconsin A RISK ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERFACE OPERATIONS TO CONTROL THE POTENTIAL OF INJURIES/LOSSES AT THE XYZ MANUFACTURING COMPANY By Marie L. Alvarado A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master in Science Degree in Risk Control Approved for Completion of 3 Semester Credits RC-735 Field Problem in Risk Control _________________________ Elbert Sorrell, Ph.D. Research Advisor The Graduate College University of Wisconsin-Stout May 2002 The Graduate College University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie, WI 54751 ABSTRACT Alvarado Marie L. (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Initial) A Risk Assessment of Human-Robot Interface Operations to Control the Potential of Injuries/Losses at the XYZ Manufacturing Company (Title) M.S. in Risk Control Elbert Sorrell, Ph.D. May, 2002 84 (Graduate Major) (Research Advisor) (Month/Year) (No. of Pages) APA Format (Name of Style Manual Used in this Study) The purpose of this study was to assess the robot palletizing operation at XYZ Manufacturing Company using the risk assessment methodology recommended by the ANSI/RIA R15.06 standard. XYZ Manufacturing Company is a food processing company located on the Midwest, U.S. Just two years ago they installed five industrial robots, automating a significant part of their packaging operations. Since then risk assessments of the operation have not been performed. The lack of robot operations assessment is placing employees at risk of injuries. Even though XYZ Manufacturing Company had not had any accidents, there is a great potential of occurrence within the operation.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management 1St
    ENGINEERING DECISION MAKING AND RISK MANAGEMENT 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Jeffrey W Herrmann | 9781118919385 | | | | | Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management / Edition 1 He had been awarded with more than 10 international prizes. With the guidance, a safety assurance case is expected for safety critical devices e. Hence, risk identification can start with the source of our problems and those of our competitors benefitor with the problem consequenses. Though each culture develops its own fears and risks, these construes apply only by the hosting culture. According to the standard ISO "Risk management — Principles and guidelines on implementation," [3] the process of risk management consists of several steps as follows:. The security leader's role in ESRM is to manage risks of harm to enterprise assets in partnership with the business leaders whose assets are exposed to those risks. FTA analysis requires diagramming software. Retrieved 23 Feb Nevertheless, risk assessment should produce such information for senior executives of the organization that the primary risks are easy to understand and that the risk management decisions may be prioritized within overall company goals. The risk still lies with the policy holder namely the person who has been in the accident. Nautilus Productions. Understanding these important fundamental concepts can help one improve decision making. ESRM Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management 1st edition educating business leaders on the realistic impacts of identified risks, presenting potential strategies to mitigate those impacts, then enacting the option chosen by the business in line with accepted levels of business risk tolerance [17]. Read an Excerpt Click to read or download.
    [Show full text]
  • SOP 103 – OHS Hazard and Risk Management
    SOP 103 OHS HAZARD & RISK MANAGEMENT 1. Purpose The purpose of this SOP is to provide a process for the management of workplace hazards and risks to minimise the potential for injury, adverse health effects, loss or damage due to workplace incidents. 2. Approval Managing Director 3. Definitions Dangerous Occurrence means an occurrence as defined in SOP 104, Appendix 2, Section 5B. Hazard means something with the potential to cause injury or illness. Hierarchy of Control means an accepted ranking of measures for controlling risk from elimination of the hazard, substitution, engineering and administrative controls, to the wearing of personal protective equipment. Incident means an event leading to an injury or adverse health effect to an individual, a ‘near miss’, or a dangerous occurrence. Near Miss means an incident that may have led to an injury or adverse health effect to an individual, but did not through the intervention of luck. Risk means the likelihood or probability that a hazard may cause harm. Risk Assessment means a process that seeks to identify hazards; then determine the level of risk by taking into account the likelihood that someone will be injured or something damaged by the hazard, the frequency of contact or exposure to the hazard, the level of exposure (eg number of people, amount/degree/extent of exposure to noise, chemicals, etc), pattern of exposure (eg continuous, intermittent etc) and the adequacy of any existing control measures. Risk Control means the use of measures to control the risk to an acceptable level. 4. Procedure The Hazard Management Process is at Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting High-Risk Individuals Recommendations for the Workplace
    Protecting High-Risk Individuals Recommendations for the Workplace For the purposes of these recommendations, high-risk individuals would include all people in the workforce who meet any of the following criteria as outlined in CDC guidelines1 and the Utah Leads Together 4.0 Plan.2 If you have questions about these risk factors or other conditions, please consult with your personal doctor. Higher-Risk Individuals People of any age with underlying medical conditions such as: Bone marrow or organ transplant Moderate to severe asthma Cancer treatment or taking medicines that weaken your Neurologic conditions, such as dementia immune system, like corticosteroids Obesity Chronic lung disease (BMI greater than 30) Diabetes Pregnancy Hemoglobin disorders Serious heart conditions, such as (sickle cell disease and thalassemia) heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies Hypertension or high blood pressure Smoking Immune system deficiencies or HIV Kidney disease that needs dialysis Liver disease Children who are medically complex, who have neurologic, genetic, metabolic conditions, or who have congenital heart disease are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19 than other children. When controlling exposure to health and safety risks, best practice emphasizes the Hierarchy of Controls as outlined by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Note that personal protective equipment (PPE) is at the bottom of the hierarchy. This means that all other methods of controlling exposure to safety and health hazards should be considered before relying on PPE. According to the hierarchy of controls, the best possible protection for all, including high-risk individuals, is to eliminate the hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Our Own Worst Enemy? Optimizing Safety Leadership Skills Though Peer Feedback Cory Worden, Phd*(ABD), MS, CSHM, CSP, CHSP, ARM, REM, CESCO
    Are We Our Own Worst Enemy? Optimizing Safety Leadership Skills Though Peer Feedback Cory Worden, PhD*(ABD), MS, CSHM, CSP, CHSP, ARM, REM, CESCO Being a safety and occupational health leader is not easy. In many cases, the position requires enormous responsibility and accountability with little or no authority or resources. Critical discussions regarding hazards affecting team members, patients, visitors and others are required, along with the informal leadership of fellow department leaders working on safety and occupational health issues as an additional duty and without line authority to officially delegate work. There are work assignments for the job itself, work assignments to organize and coordinate programs, and dynamic work that may come up in a moment’s notice. Outbreaks and pandemics may exponentially increase workloads but do not negate regularly scheduled work. It is not an easy position, and it can be made much more difficult with unseemly and untimely proverbial tripping hazards causing us to potentially be our own worst enemy. Certain actions and words, both purposeful and inadvertent, can deter organizations and employees from developing a reliable safety culture. If a safety leader intends to engage an organization and develop safety but instead creates disdain, distrust, and disruption, the situation becomes counterproductive. After research discussions with non-safety or occupational health department leaders, peer employees, and third- party safety leaders in health systems, health care clinics, public sector/public health organizations, and private industry/manufacturing and construction organizations, common attributes were noted that are perceived to detract from effective safety leadership. Being cautious of the following can help prevent losses of effectiveness as safety leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Procedures Manual
    OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARDS POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY 11000 University Parkway Pensacola, FL 32514 Purpose: To comply with the University President's Policy ES-02.01 — 06/01 regarding Environmental Health and Safety Adopted Standards. The University of West Florida recognizes that workers' compensation costs are a function of the number of employee injury incidents and the severity of those incidents. Reducing the number and severity of injuries requires that preventive measures be initiated, evaluated, and appropriately revised to maximize their effectiveness. This Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedures manual establishes preventive measures that are based on recognized health and safety • standards. Compliance with these standards has been shown to prevent occupational-related injuries. 1 The University of West Florida Environmental Health and Safety Department Policy and Procedures Manual Contents Purpose 1 Program Elements Management Leadership and Employee Participation 3 Workplace Analysis 4 Hazard Prevention and Control 9 Emergency Response 11 Safety and Health Training ..11 Associated Environmental Health and Safety Program Modules: Blood-borne Pathogens, Biomedical/biohazardous Waste Management, Chemical Hazard Communication (Hazcom), Chemical Hazardous Waste Management, Chemical Hygiene, Confined Space Entry, Electrical Safety, Ergonomics, Fire Safety, Hearing Conservation, Personal Protective Equipment, Radiological Control, Respiratory
    [Show full text]
  • Bans of a Product Or Family of Products
    Bans of a Product or Family of Products Position Statement aiha.org Version 1 | April 14, 2021 Position Statement Bans of a Product or Family of Products Developed by the AIHA Board of Directors Adopted: January 24, 2016 Updated and Approved by the AIHA Board of Directors: April 14, 2021 BACKGROUND In January 2016, the AIHA Board of Directors (BoD) concluded that it is not the role of a scientific organization such as AIHA to prescribe or support bans on the importation, manufacture, processing, or distribution of any one product or family of products. At that time, the BoD determined that the role of AIHA is to support its members in controlling exposure to specific hazards, using the hierarchy of controls. In its position on this issue, the BoD stated that: “The fundamental principle of the profession of industrial hygiene remains the anticipation, recognition, evaluation, and control of hazards that impact workers and others. There are a range of control measures that industrial hygienists may recommend to protect people from hazards.” Clearly, elimination of the hazard is at the top of the hierarchy of controls; however, this may not be feasible from a technological or economic standpoint in each and every case. POSITION STATEMENT At this time AIHA will not take a position supporting a ban on the manufacture, sale, import, export or use of any product or family of products. AIHA will continue to consider all requests to address the issue of whether or not AIHA should support a ban on a specific product or family of products. Such a request must include specific data and evidence as to why AIHA should support the proposed ban.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divers Logbook Free
    FREE THE DIVERS LOGBOOK PDF Dean McConnachie,Christine Marks | 240 pages | 18 May 2006 | Boston Mills Press | 9781550464788 | English | Ontario, Canada Printable Driver Log Book Template - 5+ Best Documents Free Download A dive log is a record of the diving history of an underwater diver. The log may either be in a book, The Divers Logbook hosted softwareor web based. The log serves purposes both related to safety and personal records. Information in a log may contain the date, time and location, the profile of the diveequipment used, air usage, above and below water conditions, including temperature, current, wind and waves, general comments, and verification by the buddyinstructor or supervisor. In case of a diving accident, it The Divers Logbook provide valuable data regarding diver's previous experience, as well as the other factors that might have led to the accident itself. Recreational divers are generally advised to keep a logbook as a record, while professional divers may be legally obliged to maintain a logbook which is up to date and complete in its records. The professional diver's logbook is a legal document and may be important for getting employment. The required content and formatting of the professional diver's logbook is generally specified by the registration authority, but may also be specified by an industry association such as the International Marine Contractors Association IMCA. A more minimalistic log book for recreational divers The Divers Logbook are only interested in keeping a record of their accumulated experience total number of dives and total amount of time underwatercould just contain the first point of the above list and the maximum depth of the dive.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Original: December 2016 Last Update: June 2021
    University of Wisconsin La Crosse Environmental Health and Safety Policy Subject: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Original: December 2016 Last Update: June 2021 I. PURPOSE This policy provides for the proper selection and use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) at the University of Wisconsin La Crosse (UWL). PPE is barrier clothing or gear worn to protect the eyes, face, head, hands, feet, and body from hazards. This Policy is based on requirements of Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 CFR 1910.132. II. SCOPE A PPE assessment must be conducted in non-office work environments to identify hazards to employees that could warrant use of PPE. PPE must be recognized as a last resort barrier to a hazard. In that context, PPE should be used to supplement or complement other controls. These other primary controls are elimination of hazard, substitution to less hazardous option, application of engineering controls, and use of administrative controls. This best practice is widely known as the Hierarchy of Controls. III. RESPONSIBILITIES/ROLES Department Chair, Manager, Supervisor Responsibilities • Complete hazard assessment and determine what hazards are present, or likely to be present. • Assure the adequacy of the PPE; proper fit protection, maintenance, and sanitation. • Ensure every affected employee knows how to use their PPE correctly and that they use the required PPE when performing work tasks identified in the hazard assessment. • Prevent the use of PPE that is defective or damaged. Defective or damaged PPE must be replaced. • Never assign a work task for which PPE is required but not available. Employees • Follow applicable program requirements and communicate with their supervisor when there are safety issues not specifically addressed by the hazard assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT As Part of the OSHA 10 Hour Training for General Industry
    PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT As Part of the OSHA 10 Hour Training for General Industry Leader’s Guide, Fact Sheet & Quiz Item Number: 5061 © AP Safety Training This easy-to-use Leader’s Guide is provided to assist in conducting a successful presentation. PREPARING FOR THE MEETING Here are a few suggestions for using this program: a) Review the contents of the Fact Sheet that immediately follows this page to familiarize yourself with the program topic and the training points discussed in the program. The Fact Sheet also includes a list of Program Objectives that details the information that participants should learn from watching the program. b) If required by your organization, make an attendance record to be signed by each participant to document the training to be conducted. c) Prepare the area and equipment to be used for the training. Make sure the watching environment is comfortable and free from outside distractions. Also, ensure that participants can see and hear the TV screen or computer monitor without obstructions. d) Make copies of the Review Quiz included at the end of this Leader’s Guide to be completed by participants at the conclusion of the presentation. Be aware that the pages containing the answers to the quiz come before the quiz itself. CONDUCTING THE PRESENTATION a) Begin the meeting by welcoming the participants. Introduce yourself and give each person an opportunity to become acquainted if there are new people joining the training session. b) Introduce the program by its title and explain to participants what they are expected to learn as stated in the Program Objectives of the Fact Sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Personnel Safety Requirements
    BSR/T15.1 for Intelligent Assist Devices — Personnel Safety Requirements Publication of this draft standard for trial use and comment has been approved by the ASC T15 Committee. Distribution of this draft standard for comment shall not continue beyond 12 months from the date of BSR/T15.1 publication. It is expected that following this 12 month period, this draft standard, revised as necessary, will be submitted to the American National Standards Institute for approval as an American National Standard. Suggestions for revision should be directed to the T15 Committee in care of the Robotic Industries Association. ROBOTIC INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 3724 ANN ARBOR MI 48106 BSR/T15.1 Draft Standard for Trial Use for Intelligent Assist Devices — Personnel Safety Requirements Secretariat Robotic Industries Association Published March 15, 2002 NOTICE Publication of this draft standard for trial use and comment has been approved by the ASC T15 Committee. Distribution of this draft standard for comment shall not continue beyond 12 months from the date of publication. It is expected that following this 12 month period, this draft standard, revised as necessary, will be submitted to the American National Standards Institute for approval as an American National Standard. Suggestions for revision should be directed to the T15 Committee in care of the Robotic Industries Association, P.O. Box 3724, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Published by Robotic Industries Association P. O. Box 3724, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 © 2002 Robotic Industries Association All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]