DOCSLIB.ORG

Return of Organization Exempt from Income

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Return of Organization Exempt from Income OMB No 1545-0047 Foroi 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Under section 501 (c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung 2@08 benefit trust or private foundation) Department of the Treas.ry Internal Revenue Service ► The organization may have to use a copy of thi s return to satisfy state reporting requ iremen A For the 2008 calendar year, or tax year beginning July 1 , 2008, and ending June 30 , 20 09 D Employer identification number B Check if applicabl e Please C Name of organization The ASME Foundation Inc. use IRS Doing Business As q Address change Zabel or 13 3372934 print or Number and street (or P 0 box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number q N ame change q Initial return see Three Park Avenue , 23rd Floor ( 212 591-7000 Specific City or town, state or country, and ZIP + 4 q Termination Instruc- aons. New York, NY 10016 -5990 El Amended return G Gross receipts $ 4 , 777 , 576. F7 Name and address of principal officer q Application pending H(a) Is this a group return for Yes 3q No H(b) Are all affiliates included'? q No I Tax-exempt status' 0 501(c) ( 3 )1 (Insert no.) q 4947(a)(1) or q 527 If "No," attach a list (see instructions) J Website : ► hftp ://foundation.asme.org/ H(c) Group exemption number ► N/A q K Type of organization Z Corporation Trust Association Other ► L Year of formation: 1986 M State of legal domicile NY Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: The----------------------------------------------------ASME Foundation is proud to offer financial support to advance the strategic initiatives of ASME - global impact, workforce development and energy d ---------- -- -- to help improve quality of life for all humankind. - - - - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- q 0 2 Check th!s box ► If the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its assets. 3 Number of voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1a) . 3 13. d 4 Number of independent voting members of the governing body (Part VI , line 1 b) . 4 -0- 5 Total number cf employees (Part V, line 2a) . 5 -0- 6 60. CL- 6 Total number ci volunteers (estimate if necessary) . 7a Total gross unrelated business revenue from Part VIII , line 12 , column (C) . 7a -0- b Net unre lated business taxable income from Form 990-T, line 34. 7b Prior Year Current Year 8 Contributions and grants (Part VIII , line 1h) . 2,593 ,323. 643,714. 9 Program service revenue (Part VIII , line 2g) . 10 Investment income (Part VIII , column 4Q -fines 3 4 1 , 373 , 231. (793,795. ) 11 Other revenue (Part VIII, column (A), ines ^In( 1 e) ) . 12 Total revenue-add lines 8 through 11 mu II n Qk), line 12 3 , 966 , 554. ( 150,081. ) 13 Grants and similar amounts paid (Pa , c9 n ((A)) ,,llin^ess 1-3)3) . 360,743. 431,849. 14 Benefits paid to or for members (Pa c PF n 1 1(^ 15 Salaries , other compensation , employe b s (Part IX , column A To s 5-10) CL 16a Professional fundraising fees (Part IX, olur*1n^ ) ' b Total fundraising expenses (Part IX, co 1 UT 3 D :000: 17 Other expenses (Part IX, column (A) , lines 11a-11d , 11f-24f) . 837,614. 869,391. 18 Total expenses Add lines 13-17 (must equal Part IX, column (A) , line 25). 1,198 ,357. 1,301,240. 19 Revenue less expenses. Subtract line 18 from line 12 2 , 768 , 197. 1,451 321. Beginning of Year End of Year d°w 20 Total assets (Part X, line 16) . 23,125 , 850. 18 ,581,291. ; 21 Total liabilities (Part X , line 26) . 521,619 . 448,294. zLL 22 Net assets or fund balances. Subtract line 21 from line 20 . 22 604 231. 18 132 997. Si nature Block Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and bei.et. it is uo, correct and complete Declaration of preparer (other than officer) is based on all information of which preparer has any knowledge Sign Here Si-•iizture ofl officer Mi•:hael K. Weis, Treasurer Type or print flame and title Preparer'3 signatur: Paid Preparer's Firm's n;+me (or yours Use Only if self-er1 aloyed), address, and ZIP + 4 May the IRS disc uss this return with the p reparer shown above For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the sepa The ASME Foundation Inc.13-3372934 Page 2 Statement of Pro gram Service Accomplishments (see instructions) 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission: The ASME Foundation , through funraising and philanthropy , proactively supports and encourages the mission and vision- of ASME to advance the future of engineering for-the benefit of_society-------------------------------------------------- 2 Did the organization undertake any significant program services during the year which were not listed on the prior Form 990 or 990-EZ? . q Yes 3q No If "Yes," describe these new services on Schedule O. 3 Did the organization cease conducting, or make significant changes in how it conducts, any program services? . q Yes 3q No If "Yes," describe these changes on Schedule O. 4 Describe the exempt purpose achievements for each of the organization's three largest program services by expenses. Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations and section 4947(a)(1) trusts are required to report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total expenses, and revenue, if any, for each program service reported. 4a (Code: ............. ))(Expenses $ -___-___ 873,261 :_ including grants of $......... 431,849._))(Revenue $____________________ Major achievments in the art and science of mechanical engineering are nutured and honored through special ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- ------------------------------------------ - a)y-ardsprograms_- Student loans and scholarships are given to romote_ mechnica l engineering as a field of - - - - - - -------------- pi ----------------- --------------- study_._ Grants are_awarded_ to deserving_ mechanical_engjneeringprograms _at_ASME,__________________________________________ 4b (Code:............. )(Expenses) $____________________ including grants of $____________________ ) (Revenue $.................... ) 4c (Code:_____________))(Expenses $.................... including grants of $.................... ) (Revenue $.................... ) 4d Other program services. (Describe in Schedule 0.) (Expenses $ including grants of $ ) (Revenue $ 4e Total program service expenses ► $ 873,261 . (Must equal Part IX, Line 25, column (B).) Form 990 (2008) Form 990 (2008) The ASME Foundation, Inc. 13-3372934 1 Page 3 ' Checklist of Req uired Schedules Yes No 1 Is the organization described in section 501(c)(3) or 4947(a)(1) (other than a private foundation)? If "Yes," complete Schedule A . 1 3 2 Is the organization required to complete Schedule B , Schedule of Contributors?. 2 3 3 Did the organization engage in direct or indirect political campaign activities on behalf of or in opposition to candidates for public office? If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part I . 3 3 4 Section 501 (c)(3) organizations . Did the organization engage in lobbying activities? If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part 11 . 4 3 5 Section 501 (c)(4), 501(c)(5), and 501(c)(6) organizations . Is the organization subject to the section 6033(e) notice and reporting requirement and proxy tax? If "Yes, " complete Schedule C, Part III . 5 3 6 Did the organization maintain any donor advised funds or any accounts where donors have the right to provide advice on the distribution or investment of amounts in such funds or accounts? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part I . 6 3 7 Did the organization receive or hold a conservation easement, including easements to preserve open space, the environment , historic land areas , or historic structures? If "Yes, " complete Schedule D, Part II 7 3 8 Did the organization maintain collections of works of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets?If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part 111 . 8 9 Did the organization report an amount in Part X, line 21; serve as a custodian for amounts not listed in Part X; or provide credit counseling, debt management, credit repair, or debt negotiation services? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part IV . 9 3 10 Did the organization hold assets in term , permanent , or quasi-endowments? If "Yes, " complete Schedule D, Part V 10 3 11 Did the organization report an amount in Part X, lines 10, 12, 13, 15, or 25? If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Parts Vl, VII, VIII, IX, or X as applicable . 11 3 12 Did the organization receive an audited financial statement for the year for which it is completing this return that was prepared in accordance with GAAP? If "Yes, " complete Schedule D, Parts XI, XII, and Xlll . 12 3 13 Is the organization a school described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(n)9If "Yes, " complete Schedule E . 13 3 14a Did the organization maintain an office , employees , or agents outside of the U.S.? . 14a 3 b Did the organization have aggregate revenues or expenses of more than $10,000 from grantmaking, fundraising, business, and program service activities outside the U.S.? If "Yes, " complete Schedule F, Part I . , 14b 3 15 Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more than $5,000 of grants or assistance to any organization or entity located outside the United States? If "Yes, " complete Schedule F, Part ll. 15 3 16 Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more than $5,000 of aggregate grants or assistance to individuals located outside the United States? If "Yes, " complete Schedule F, Part Ill . 16 3 17 Did the organization report more than $15 ,000 on Part IX, column (A), line 11 e? If "Yes, " complete Schedule G, Part 1 17 3 18 Did the organization report more than $15 , 000 total on Part VIII , lines 1c and 8a? If "Yes, " complete Schedule G, Part Il 18 3 19 Did the organization report more than $15 , 000 on Part VIII , line 9a? If "Yes, " complete Schedule G, Part III 19 3 20 Did the organization operate one or more hospitals? If "Yes," complete Schedule H .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Edison Vs Nikola Tesla THOMAS EDISON VS NIKOLA TESLA
    M C SCIENTIFIC RIVALRIES PHERSON AND SCANDALS In the early 1880s, only a few wealthy people had electric lighting in their homes. Everyone else had to use more dangerous lighting, such as gas lamps. Eager companies wanted to be the first to supply electricity to more Americans. The early providers would set the standards—and reap great profits. Inventor THOMAS EDISON already had a leading role in the industry: he had in- vented the fi rst reliable electrical lightbulb. By 1882 his Edison Electric Light Company was distributing electricity using a system called direct current, or DC. But an inventor named NIKOLA TESLA challenged Edison. Tesla believed that an alternating cur- CURRENTS THE OF rent—or AC—system would be better. With an AC system, one power station could deliver electricity across many miles, compared to only about one mile for DC. Each inventor had his backers. Business tycoon George Westinghouse put his money behind Tesla and built AC power stations. Meanwhile, Edison and his DC backers said that AC could easily electrocute people. Edison believed this risk would sway public opinion toward DC power. The battle over which system would become standard became known as the War of the Currents. This book tells the story of that war and the ways in which both kinds of electric power changed the world. READ ABOUT ALL OF THE OF THE SCIENTIFIC RIVALRIES AND SCANDALS BATTLE OF THE DINOSAUR BONES: Othniel Charles Marsh vs Edward Drinker Cope DECODING OUR DNA: Craig Venter vs the Human Genome Project CURRENTS THE RACE TO DISCOVER THE
    [Show full text]
  • 1908 Journal
    1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 12, 1908. The court met pursuant to law. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Brewer, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice Peckham, Mr. Justice McKenna, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice Moody. James A. Fowler of Knoxville, Tenn., Ethel M. Colford of Wash- ington, D. C., Florence A. Colford of Washington, D. C, Charles R. Hemenway of Honolulu, Hawaii, William S. Montgomery of Xew York City, Amos Van Etten of Kingston, N. Y., Robert H. Thompson of Jackson, Miss., William J. Danford of Los Angeles, Cal., Webster Ballinger of Washington, D. C., Oscar A. Trippet of Los Angeles, Cal., John A. Van Arsdale of Buffalo, N. Y., James J. Barbour of Chicago, 111., John Maxey Zane of Chicago, 111., Theodore F. Horstman of Cincinnati, Ohio, Thomas B. Jones of New York City, John W. Brady of Austin, Tex., W. A. Kincaid of Manila, P. I., George H. Whipple of San Francisco, Cal., Charles W. Stapleton of Mew York City, Horace N. Hawkins of Denver, Colo., and William L. Houston of Washington, D. C, were admitted to practice. The Chief Justice announced that all motions noticed for to-day would be heard to-morrow, and that the court would then commence the call of the docket, pursuant to the twenty-sixth rule. Adjourned until to-morrow at 12 o'clock. The day call for Tuesday, October 13, will be as follows: Nos. 92, 209 (and 210), 198, 206, 248 (and 249 and 250), 270 (and 271, 272, 273, 274 and 275), 182, 238 (and 239 and 240), 286 (and 287, 288, 289, 290, 291 and 292) and 167.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicles of Mechanical Engineering in the United States
    From the time it was organized in 1880, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers recorded aspects of the history of the mechanical engineering profession and the careers of some of its notable practitioners. The Society’s CHRONICLES OF historical efforts were formalized in 1971 with the creation of a History and Heritage Committee. This volume commemorates the fiftieth anniversary of the formation of that committee and collects, in a single place, many of the historical contributions published over the past fifty years in ASME’s flagship journal Mechanical Engineering. In preparation for the United States’ bicentennial year, and later the Society’s centennial, the editors of Mechanical Engineering contracted with engineer-historian Fritz Hirschfeld for a long series of articles about the county’s early mechanical engineering heritage and the lives of notable mechanical engineers, particularly those associated with ASME’s founding. Hirschfeld’s articles form the foundation of this volume. To supplement Hirschfeld’s work, the editors have added numerous other historical articles published in Mechanical Engineering. The engineering innovations described by these articles have been enormously important to the development of modern technological society, and the stories behind their development should be of interest to engineers interested in the history of their profession, as well as anyone interested in American Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ebooks/book/chapter-pdf/6715821/356056_fm.pdf by guest on 05 August 2021 history. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CHRONICLES OF MECHANICA L ENGINEERING IN THE UNITED STATES Two Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 www.asme.org EDITED BY: THOMAS H. FEHRING, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Tradition Why Do the Church Bells Ring at Noon?
    1. Tradition Why do the church bells ring at noon? a) It is a call for everybody to be on time for lunch b) In the Orthodox Church the service at noon is the most important c) The bells ring at noon as a sign of joy in memory of the victory over the Ottomans d) The first Orthodox church bell in Serbia was heard at noon and this tradition is being kept up 2. Inventions Who invented the neon lamp? a) Mihajlo Pupin b) Nikola Tesla c) Thomas Edison d) George Westinghouse 3. Tradition When do Serbians and Montenegrins celebrate Christmas? a) January 7th b) December 24th c) January 1st d) January 13th 4. Language Why Montenegro is called “Montenegro”? a) It is the country of the pitch black gorges b) Here, the Romans let only African slaves fight each other c) Many wars had left many widows, whose black clothing gave the country its name d) Because there is so many olive trees 5. Food and Drink What is Sljivovica made of? a) Plums b) Grapes c) Figs d) Peaches 6. Religion How do Serbians and Montenegrins make the sign of the cross? a) With three fingers b) With the palm c) With the index finger d) With index finger and thumb 1 Die Leuchtbox ein Projekt der Stadt Passau Organisation und Durchführung ICUnet.AG , Copyright © 2003-2006 7. Cities What is the capital of Montenegro? a) Cetinje b) Niksic c) Kotor d) Podgorica 8. Geography How many kilometers long is the Danube in Serbia? a) 588 km b) 5088 km c) 58 km d) 388 km 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curious Case of U.S. Letters Patent No. 223,898
    CHAPTER 5 The Curious Case of U.S. Letters Patent No. 223,898 I have not failed. I’ve just found ten thousand ways that don’t work. —Thomas Edison ho invented the light bulb? This was the topic at hand. Technically, the litigation Wwas between the Edison Electric Light Company and the Mount Morris Electric Light Company, but everyone knew that these were subsidiaries and legal proxies for their parent companies. Even the attorneys litigating this $1 billion case called it simply Edison v. Westinghouse. The issue before them: U.S. Letters Patent No. 223,898, granted to Thomas Edison on January 27, 1880, which described the invention of an “incandescent electric lamp.” Quickly nicknamed the Light Bulb Patent by the press, it was without question the most valuable patent ever granted in the history of the United States. And George Westinghouse was accused of infringing on it. Yet, as Paul Cravath pointed out to his client George Westinghouse, even a problem so simply put might yet admit to many layers of unraveling. In fact, the question hinged on one’s precise definition of the terms involved—“who,” “in- vented,” “the,” and, most importantly, “light bulb.” The first electric lamps had actually been invented almost a cen- tury before, Paul had learned when he’d first begun to research the case. Sir Humphry Davy had publicly demonstrated early “arc lights” in 1809. By attaching a battery to two charcoal sticks, he’d caused a U-shaped thread of electricity to “arc” across the gap between the sticks. The explosion of light was blindingly bright; perfect for light- ing dark outdoor areas, if it could be tamed into safety and reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Technology at the Turn of the 20Th Century
    Name:______________________________________________ Date:_______________ Class:____________ Short Quiz / Exit Slip: Increasing Technology at the Turn of the 20th Century Part A: Multiple Choice: Instructions: Choose the option that answers the question or completes the sentence. 1. Who helped pioneer the efforts to use electricity in cities with Thomas Edison? a. Samuel Morse b. Andrew Carnegie c. George Westinghouse d. Alexander Graham Bell 2. Who invented the telegraph? a. Thomas Edison b. Albert Einstein c. George Westinghouse d. Samuel Morse 3. What was the significance of the Bessemer Process? a. It led to the creation of the light bulb. b. It allowed voices to be carried over wires, not just beeping signals. c. It led to the ability to record sound on records. d. It led to the building of skyscrapers. 4. In what state did the Wright Brothers conduct the first flight? a. North Carolina b. Maine c. Maryland d. Ohio 5. Who invented the telephone? a. Alexander Graham Bell b. Samuel Morse c. Orville Wright d. None of the above Part B: Short Answer: Instructions: Answer the question below. 1. Which invention do you think had the most impact on American society, the light bulb, the telephone, or the airplane? Explain. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Honors & Awards
    2014 HONORS & AWARDS The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Honors_Assembly_BrochureCover2.indd 1 9/29/14 10:42 AM ASME 14 Honors & Awards_Layout 1 10/28/2014 1:03 PM Page a ASME 2014 Honors & Awards ASME 14 Honors & Awards_Layout 1 10/28/2014 1:03 PM Page 1 Table of Contents ASME Medal....................................................................................................................4 Honorary Membership ..............................................................................................5–9 Barnett-Uzgiris Product Safety Design Award ..........................................................9 Bergles-Rohsenow Young Investigator Award in Heat Transfer............................11 Blackall Machine Tool and Gage Award....................................................................12 Per Bruel Gold Medal for Noise Control and Acoustics ........................................15 Edwin F. Church Medal ..............................................................................................16 Daniel C. Drucker Medal ............................................................................................17 William T. Ennor Manufacturing Technology Award..............................................18 Nancy DeLoye Fitzroy and Roland V. Fitzroy Medal..............................................19 Fluids Engineering Award ..........................................................................................21 Freeman Scholar Award ..............................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/130/10/32/6383558/Me-2008-Oct3.Pdf by Guest on 27 September 2021 He Case Can Be Made That by the Late Nessed in 1895 Using Westinghouse Alternating Current
    Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/130/10/32/6383558/me-2008-oct3.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 he case can be made that by the late nessed in 1895 using Westinghouse alternating current. 1800s George Westinghouse was Amer­ Trains were longer, heavier, and faster, and yet much, ica's greatest living engineer. He had 361 much safer w ith Westinghouse air brakes. Natural gas patents issued to him during his lifetime. had been discovered in 1878 in Murrysville, Pa., and the Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/130/10/32/6383558/me-2008-oct3.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 Hundreds more patents bore the names early patents of George Westinghouse helped to rapidly of engineers who worked for him. develop it into a new clean-burning fuel. Ship propul­ Beginning with the railroad air brake, sion had gained a great leap forward with the Westing­ Westinghouse's inventiveness formed the basis of a com­ house geared steam turbine engine. mercial empire. George Westinghouse believed that his engineers de­ He surrounded himself w ith good people, including oth­ served the credit for their hard work and successes. If a er great engineers of the time-Benjamin Lamme, Oli­ Westinghouse engineer developed a new product, it was ver Shallenberger, Charles Scott, William Stanley, Lewis the inventor's name, not the boss's, that went on the pat- Stillwell, and Albert Schmid. ent. N ew products from the They were loyal to him and Westinghouse companies were got credit for their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I, Issue 10, May 17, 2020 – Engineering
    V ol. I, Issue 10: Electrical Engineering Need STEM? You got it! May 17, 2020 STEM in the News “Before anything else, preparation is the key to According to allaboutcircuits.com, Articial success.” - Alexander Graham Bell intelligence is becoming more commonplace in electronic devices, but many of its applications STEM in History require lots of energy. To try and solve this Electrical engineering plays an essential part in problem, researchers at Purdue University are our day to day lives, but did you ever stop to developing hardware that is able to learn skills think about how this came to be? Nearly two using a type of AI that currently runs on and is centuries ago, Alexander Graham Bell invented typically reserved for software platforms. The the telephone, which led to a need for electrical researchers think that this approach could reduce engineers. Then, in 1882, Thomas Edison the energy needed for advanced AI due to its opened a commercial power plant, which intelligence features that include software and caused an increased interest in electrical hardware applications. “Software is taking on engineering. From that point on, electrical most of the challenges in AI. If you could engineers would nd ways to use electricity in incorporate intelligence into the circuit technology. The iPhone, which is used 24/7 by components in addition to what is happening in people worldwide, would not have been software, you could do things that simply cannot possible without electrical engineers. Life be done today,” said Shriram Ramanathan, a would surely be dierent without the professor of materials engineering at Purdue technology we now use every day.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Due to Concerns Over the Quality of the Data Collected
    APPENDIX A WSU 2014-19 STRATEGIC PLAN Appendix A: WSU Strategic Plan 2014-15 Strategic Plan 2014-2019 President Elson S. Floyd, Ph.D. Strategic Plan 2014-2019 Introduction The 2014-19 strategic plan builds on the previous five-year plan, recognizing the core values and broad mission of Washington State University. Goals and strategies were developed to achieve significant progress toward WSU’s aspiration of becoming one of the nation’s leading land-grant universities, preeminent in research and discovery, teaching, and engagement. The plan emphasizes the institution’s unique role as an accessible, approachable research institution that provides opportunities to an especially broad array of students while serving Washington state’s broad portfolio of social and economic needs. While providing exceptional leadership in traditional land-grant disciplines, Washington State University adds value as an integrative partner for problem solving due to its innovative focus on applications and its breadth of program excellence. The plan explicitly recognizes the dramatic changes in public funding that have occurred over the duration of the previous strategic plan, along with the need for greater institutional nimbleness, openness, and entrepreneurial activity that diversifies the University’s funding portfolio. In addition, the plan reaffirms WSU’s land-grant mission by focusing greater attention system-wide on increasing access to educational opportunity, responding to the needs of Washington state through research, instruction, and outreach, and contributing to economic development and public policy. While the new plan retains the four key themes of the previous plan, its two central foci include offering a truly transformative educational experience to undergraduate and graduate students and accelerating the development of a preeminent research portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Mechanics Division Newsletter 2018
    Applied Mechanics Division Newsletter 2018 Applied Mechanics Executive Committee (2017-2018) Message from the Chair ASME/AMD Medals & Awards Timoshenko Banquet Speech News from the Technical Committees News from the ASME-AMD Journals Other Awards Other News Dennis M. Kochmann, Newsletter Editor ASME Applied Mechanics Division Newsletter 2018 Applied Mechanics Division 2017-2018 Executive Committee Balakumar Yonggang Huang Balachandran Program Chair Vice-Chair Pradeep Sharma Chair Yuri Bazilevs Pradeep Guduru Program Vice-Chair Secretary Message from the Chair The Applied Mechanics Division (AMD) of the ASME is a rather unique organization and arguably one of the most important entities that represents the interests of mechanicians worldwide. It was my privilege to serve on the AMD executive committee for the past five years. The experience was quite humbling as I became intimately aware of the breadth and depth of the contributions of our community and the passion that we bring to our chosen field. Together with the other members of the executive committee, we collectively tackled several difficult issues faced by the division. This was a unique learning experience and I would like to thank the members of the committee who provided outstanding mentorship and friendship during this period: Larry Bergman, Huajian Gao, Peter Wriggers, Arun Shukla, Bala Balachandran, Yonggang Huang, Yuri Bazilevs, and Pradeep Guduru. Both Dennis Kochmann and Pedro Reis served as re- cording secretary and, later, Dennis also took over the role of the AMD newsletter editor. Aside from performing an outstanding job on these important responsibilities, they proved to be a fountain of creative ideas on how the AMD should function effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Chair
    Report of the Chair www.asme.org/divisions/amd SUMMER NEWS 2008 KENNETH M. LIECHTI, EDITOR Report of the Chair Timoshenko Medalist Awards & Medals Journal of Applied Mechanics News from the Technical Committees In Memoriam K. Ravi-Chandar It has been an honor and privilege for me to serve on the Executive Committee (EC) of the Applied Mechanics Division (AMD); the AMD is one of the oldest Technical Divisions in ASME, established eighty years ago by Timoshenko and colleagues. The experience of working closely with past members Pol Spanos, Mary Boyce, Wing-Kam Liu, and Tom Farris, as well as with current members Dan Inman, Zhigang Suo, Tayfun Tezduyar and Ares Rosakis during my five-year tenure on the Committee was extremely enjoyable and rewarding. The past year has been very eventful for the AMD and I hope to provide an update of the activities and status of the AMD in this newsletter. Reports of the Technical Committees, the Journal of Applied Mechanics and Applied Mechanics Reviews provide more specific details of these activities. The ASME has changed the structure of its annual Congresses, switching to a Track based system rather than the Technical Division based system of previous years; the 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition was the first meeting under the new system. Under the new scheme, sessions were not pre-allocated to the Division, but were developed as a result of abstracts submitted to symposia organized by volunteers within the Technical Committees directly under the tracks. It also became difficult to determine the exact extent of AMD participation in the 2007 Congress.
    [Show full text]