Annual Report 2020 (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conversion Report (PDF, 958
This document is an English translation of the original German language document. The translation is exclusively for convenience purposes. Only the original German language document is authorative and binding. Fresenius SE Change of the Legal Form into a Partnership Limited by Shares Conversion Report of the Management Board Convenience Translation Important Notice: This conversion report is neither an offer to sell voting ordinary bearer shares or non-voting preference bearer shares, nor an invitation to make the Company an offer to buy voting ordinary bearer shares or non-voting preference bearer shares. Such an offer requires special publication as the case may be, and, in so far as required by national law, a separate prospectus. This conversion report is not an offer to sell securities in the United States of America (USA). Securities may be sold or offered for purchase in the USA only with prior registration or without prior registration only on the basis of an exception provided. This conversion report is neither an offer to sell voting ordinary limited partner shares nor an invitation to make the Company an offer to buy voting ordinary limited partner shares. Such an offer requires special publication as the case may be, and, in so far as required by national law, a separate prospectus. This conversion report is not an offer to sell securities in the USA. Securities may be sold or offered for purchase in the USA only with prior registration or without prior registration only on the basis of an exception provided. This document does not constitute an offer document or an offer of transferable securities to the public in the United Kingdom to which section 85 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom (“FSMA”) applies and should not be considered as a recommen- dation that any person should subscribe for or purchase any securities as part of the Transaction. -
Rules Governing the Share Capital of German Public Companies by Frank Wooldridge
Rules governing the share capital of German public companies by Frank Wooldridge he above rules are somewhat detailed and some - company. However, it contains detailed rules governing times rather complex. A good elementary account the maintenance of capital. Certain of these rules, Tof them by Schneider and Heidenhain is given in including the prohibition imposed on a public company The German Stock Corporation Act ( 2nd ed, pub Kluwer, subscribing for its own shares contained in paragraph 2000) which has been of considerable interest and help to 56 (1) AktG are considered below. The imposition of the author of this article. ancillary obligations upon shareholders is also considered below, where the rules governing the increase and The articles of a public company ( Aktiengesellschaft ) are reduction of capital, which are rather complex, are dealt required to specify the amount of the company’s share with in outline. capital, which has to be denominated in euros. The minimum capital of a public company is at present THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 56 AKTG €50,000 (para 7 AktG ). As in the United Kingdom, shares may be issued without a par value ( Stückaktien ) or with one The most important of the abov e provisions would (Nennbetragsaktien ) (para 8(2) AktG ). Par value shares are seem to be those contained in paragraph 56(1) and 562) required to have the value of one euro or a multiple thereof AktG . Paragraph 56(1) AktG provides that a company may (para 8(2) AktG ). The shares in an Aktiengesellschaft are not subscribe for its own shares. Any purported indivisible, as are the rights attaching to each share. -
Assortment Planning
3DEXPERIENCE for CPG & RETAIL September 2013 1 Our Legacy 2 Our new strategy ‘Social Industry Experiences’ Why Experiences? Consumers buy Experiences An Experience is Bigger Than a Product 3 CPG & RETAIL Segments 4 TOP 5 Cosmetics: Top Markets & Leaders Top 10 Countries of A balanced global market representative of most CPG segments Leaders (HQ) RUSSIA UK France Germany UNITED STATES Spain Italy CHINA JAPAN BRASIL Leaders : L’Oréal, P&G, Unilever, Estée Lauder, Shiseido, Avon, Kao, Beiersdorf, Johnson & Johnson, Chanel 5 Consumer Packaged Goods - Challenges 6 Consumer Packaged Goods : Innovation (Forbes 2013 ranking) 1 Salesforce.com 26 Fanuc 51 Smith & Nephew 76 Roper Industries 2 Alexion Pharmaceuticals 27 Diageo 52 Mondelēz International 77 ASML Holding 3 VMware 28 Hershey 53 Infosys 78 Assa Abloy 4 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 29 Danone 54 Kellogg 79 Apple 5 ARM Holdings 30 Procter & Gamble 55 Ultrapar Participacoes 80 Air Products & Chemicals 6 Baidu 31 Dassault Systemes 56 Intuit 81 Tenaris 7 Amazon.com 32 Colgate-Palmolive 57 Technip 82 Precision Castparts 8 Intuitive Surgical 33 Ecolab 58 PepsiCo 83 Rockwell Automation 9 Rakuten 34 Monsanto 59 Schlumberger 84 Nintendo 10 Natura Cosmeticos 35 Reckitt Benckiser Group 60 Fresenius Medical Care 85 Cameron International 11 Henan Shuanghui 36 Keyence 61 SMC Corp 86 Secom 12 Coloplast 37 Kone 62 Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl 87 Schindler Holding 13 Cerner 38 Yahoo Japan 63 Unilever NV 88 Campbell Soup 14 Unicharm 39 BRF-Brasil Foods 64 China Oilfield Services 89 Kubota 15 Estee Lauder Cos -
Managing Political Risk in Global Business: Beiersdorf 1914-1990
Managing Political Risk in Global Business: Beiersdorf 1914-1990 Geoffrey Jones Christina Lubinski Working Paper 12-003 July 22, 2011 Copyright © 2011 by Geoffrey Jones and Christina Lubinski Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Managing Political Risk in Global Business: Beiersdorf 1914-1990 Geoffrey Jones Christina Lubinski 1 Abstract This working paper examines corporate strategies of political risk management during the twentieth century. It focuses especially on Beiersdorf, a German-based pharmaceutical and skin care company. During World War 1 the expropriation of its brands and trademarks revealed its vulnerability to political risk. Following the advent of the Nazi regime in 1933, the largely Jewish owned and managed company, faced a uniquely challenging combination of home and host country political risk. The paper reviews the firm's responses to these adverse circumstances, challenging the prevailing literature which interprets so-called "cloaking" activities as one element of businesses’ cooperation with the Nazis. The paper departs from previous literature in assessing the outcomes of the company’s strategies after 1945. It examines the challenges and costs faced by the company in recovering the ownership of its brands. While the management of distance became much easier over the course of the twentieth century because of communications -
Research Aktuell Vom 05.05.2020
5. Mai 2020 Marktdaten im Überblick ...................................................................................................................... 2 Unternehmenskommentare .................................................................................................................. 3 Airbus ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Altria Group ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Beiersdorf ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Microsoft ......................................................................................................................................... 13 MTU Aero Engines ............................................................................................................................ 15 Roche Holding (Genussschein) ......................................................................................................... 21 Safran ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Rechtliche Hinweise ........................................................................................................................... 25 DAILY Marktdaten im Überblick 04.05.2020 01.05.2020 Änderung Deutschland DAX -
List of Active Bayer Companies with at Least a Share of 50% Last Update: 17.8.2020 Country Company
List of active Bayer companies with at least a share of 50% last update: 17.8.2020 Country Company Algeria Bayer Algerie S.P.A. Argentina Bayer S.A. Argentina Biagro S.A. Argentina Monsanto Argentina SRL Australia Bayer Australia Limited Australia Bayer CropScience Holdings Pty Ltd Australia Bayer CropScience Pty Limited Australia Cotton Growers Services Pty. Limited Australia Imaxeon Pty. Ltd. Australia Monsanto Australia Pty Ltd Bangladesh Bayer CropScience Ltd. Belgium Bayer Agriculture BVBA Belgium Bayer CropScience NV Belgium Bayer NV Bermuda MonSure Limited Bolivia Bayer Boliviana Ltda Bolivia Monsanto Bolivia S.A. Bosnia & Herzeg. Bayer d.o.o. Sarajevo Brazil Alkagro do Brasil Ltda Brazil Bayer S.A. Brazil D&PL Brasil Ltda Brazil Monsanto do Brasil Ltda. Brazil Rede Agro Fidelidade e Intermediacao S.A. Brazil Schering do Brasil Química e Farmacêutica Ltda. Brazil Stoneville Brasil Ltda. Bulgaria Bayer Bulgaria EOOD Burkina Faso Monsanto Burkina Faso SARL Chile Bayer Finance & Portfolio Management S.A. Chile Bayer Finance Ltda. Chile Bayer S.A. Chile Monsanto Chile, S.A. Costa Rica Bayer Business Services Costa Rica, SRL Costa Rica Bayer Medical S.R.L. Costa Rica Bayer S.A. Curacao Pianosa B.V. Germany Adverio Pharma GmbH - 1 - List of active Bayer companies with at least a share of 50% last update: 17.8.2020 Country Company Germany AgrEvo Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH Germany Alcafleu Management GmbH & Co. KG Germany BGI Deutschland GmbH Germany Bayer 04 Immobilien GmbH Germany Bayer 04 Leverkusen Fußball GmbH Germany Bayer 04 Leverkusen -
Annual General Meeting 2021 Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg April 1, 2021 Speech
_____________________________________________________________________________________ Annual General Meeting 2021 Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg April 1, 2021 Speech Stefan De Loecker Chairman of the Executive Board – The spoken word applies – _____________________________________________________________________________________ Dear shareholders, Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and a warm welcome to our 2021 Annual General Meeting. For the second time, our shareholders’ meeting is taking place in an all-virtual format. When we got together for our first online meeting a year ago, we were in the middle of the first lockdown. The COVID- 19 pandemic continues to mean restrictions around the world. Looking back, 2020 asked a lot of us all. And for Beiersdorf, too, it was a challenging year. But it was not a lost year for us. On the contrary: We announced one year ago that we were not only determined to keep impressing consumers with our products, but would also do everything we could to enable Beiersdorf to emerge from the crisis in a stronger position than before. Despite the headwind, that is exactly what we have done. We have even stepped up investment in our future. The coronavirus has clearly demonstrated to us that many changes in our business are happening much faster than we originally anticipated. We have capitalized on this momentum, achieving significant progress in all our strategic focus areas in 2020: First: We responded swiftly to the crisis, demonstrating great agility and shouldering responsibility. Second: We have created additional innovations, very successfully introduced new products in all markets and gained market share in many countries as a result. Third: We significantly increased investment in e-commerce and digital dialogue with customers – boosting our online business in the Consumer Business Segment by 50%. -
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law Volume 14 Issue 1 Article 3 2008 Approaching Comparative Company Law David C. Donald Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation David C. Donald, Approaching Comparative Company Law , 14 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 83 (2008). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol14/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APPROACHING COMPARATIVE COMPANY LAW David C. Donald∗ ABSTRACT This Article identifies several common errors that occur in comparative law analyses, offers guidelines to help avoid such errors, and provides a framework for studying the company laws of three major jurisdictions. Part I discusses some of the problems that can arise in comparative law and offers a few points of caution that can be useful for practical, theoretical and legislative comparative law. Part II examines well-known examples of comparative analysis gone astray in order to demonstrate the utility of heeding the outlined points of caution. Part III provides an example of using functional definitions to demarcate the topic “company law,” offering an “effects” test to determine whether a given provision of law should be considered as functionally part of the rules that govern the core characteristics of companies. -
Comparative Company Law
Comparative company law 26th of September 2017 – 3rd of October 2017 Prof. Jochen BAUERREIS Attorney in France and Germany Certified specialist in international and EU law Certified specialist in arbitration law ABCI ALISTER Strasbourg (France) • Kehl (Germany) Plan • General view of comparative company law (A.) • Practical aspects of setting up a subsidiary in France and Germany (B.) © Prof. Jochen BAUERREIS - Avocat & Rechtsanwalt 2 A. General view of comparative company law • Classification of companies (I.) • Setting up a company with share capital (II.) • Management bodies (III.) • Transfer of shares (IV.) • Taxation (V.) • General tendencies in company law (VI.) © Prof. Jochen BAUERREIS - Avocat & Rechtsanwalt 3 I. Classification of companies • General classification – Partnerships • Typically unlimited liability of the partners • Importance of the partners – The companies with share capital • Shares can be traded more or less freely • Typically restriction of the associate’s liability – Hybrid forms © Prof. Jochen BAUERREIS - Avocat & Rechtsanwalt 4 I. Classification of companies • Partnerships – « Civil partnership » • France: Société civile • Netherlands: Maatschap • Germany: Gesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts • Austria: Gesellschaft nach bürgerlichem Recht (GesnbR) • Italy: Società simplice © Prof. Jochen BAUERREIS - Avocat & Rechtsanwalt 5 I. Classification of companies • Partnerships – « General partnership » • France: Société en nom collectif • UK: General partnership (but without legal personality!) • USA: General partnership -
Euro Stoxx® International Exposure Index
EURO STOXX® INTERNATIONAL EXPOSURE INDEX Components1 Company Supersector Country Weight (%) ASML HLDG Technology Netherlands 6.02 LVMH MOET HENNESSY Consumer Products & Services France 4.99 LINDE Chemicals Germany 3.79 SAP Technology Germany 3.62 SANOFI Health Care France 3.20 IBERDROLA Utilities Spain 3.04 SIEMENS Industrial Goods & Services Germany 2.63 AIR LIQUIDE Chemicals France 2.17 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC Industrial Goods & Services France 2.10 L'OREAL Consumer Products & Services France 2.05 ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV Food, Beverage & Tobacco Belgium 1.99 BASF Chemicals Germany 1.89 ADIDAS Consumer Products & Services Germany 1.76 AIRBUS Industrial Goods & Services France 1.68 DAIMLER Automobiles & Parts Germany 1.65 BAYER Health Care Germany 1.61 PHILIPS Health Care Netherlands 1.51 ADYEN Industrial Goods & Services Netherlands 1.49 ESSILORLUXOTTICA Health Care France 1.40 DEUTSCHE TELEKOM Telecommunications Germany 1.36 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES Technology Germany 1.35 Kering Retail France 1.35 BCO SANTANDER Banks Spain 1.29 SAFRAN Industrial Goods & Services France 1.26 HERMES INTERNATIONAL Consumer Products & Services France 1.10 PERNOD RICARD Food, Beverage & Tobacco France 1.09 CRH Construction & Materials Ireland 1.09 DEUTSCHE POST Industrial Goods & Services Germany 1.05 BCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA Banks Spain 1.03 FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT Travel & Leisure Ireland 1.02 DANONE Food, Beverage & Tobacco France 1.00 MUENCHENER RUECK Insurance Germany 0.99 VOLKSWAGEN PREF Automobiles & Parts Germany 0.82 BMW Automobiles & Parts Germany 0.80 -
GERMANY Population: 80+ Million Stonewall Global Diversity Champions: 74
STONEWALL GLOBAL WORKPLACE BRIEFINGS 2018 GERMANY Population: 80+ million Stonewall Global Diversity Champions: 74 THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE In Stonewall’s Global Workplace Equality Index, broad legal zoning is used to group the differing challenges faced by organisations across their global operations. Germany is classified as a Zone 1 country, which means sexual acts between people of the same sex are legal and clear national employment protections exist for lesbian, gay, and bi people. Two further zones exist. In Zone 2 countries, sexual acts between people of the same sex are legal but no clear national employment protections exist on grounds of sexual orientation. In Zone 3 countries, sexual acts between people of the same sex are illegal. FREEDOM OF FAMILY AND RELATIONSHIPS EQUALITY AND EMPLOYMENT GENDER IDENTITY IMMIGRATION EXPRESSION, ASSOCIATION AND ASSEMBLY Articles 5, 9 and 8 Sexual acts between people of The Equal Treatment Act The Transgender Law (1980) Section 27 (2) of the of the Constitution the same sex are legal. (2006) provides protection provides trans people the Act on the Residence, protect the general from discrimination on the right to change their legal Economic Activity rights to freedom There is an equal age of grounds of ‘sexual identity’ in name (Section 1) and/or their and Integration of of expression, consent of 14 years for sexual employment and occupation. legal gender to ‘female’ or Foreigners in the association and acts regardless of gender under ‘male’ (Section 8). Federal Territory assembly. Article 176 of the Criminal Code. The same law also provides enables family general protection from Legal gender can be changed reunification of Each of these rights Same-sex marriage was discrimination based on on all identification same-sex couples may be restricted legalised on 01 October 2017 ‘sexual identity’ in civil law documents including the if they are married or under certain specified under Section 1353 of the (Section 19) and in regard to the birth certificate if the legal their partnership is circumstances, Civil Code. -
Siemens Annual Report 2019
Annual Report 2019 siemens.com Table of contents A B C Combined Consolidated Additional Information Management Report Financial Statements A.1 p 2 B.1 p 76 C.1 p 150 Organization of the Siemens Group Consolidated Statements Responsibility Statement and basis of presentation of Income C.2 p 151 A.2 p 3 B.2 p 77 Independent Auditor ʼs Report Financial performance system Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income C.3 p 157 A.3 p 5 Report of the Supervisory Board Segment information B.3 p 78 Consolidated Statements C.4 p 162 A.4 p 16 of Financial Position Corporate Governance Results of operations B.4 p 79 C.5 p 174 A.5 p 19 Consolidated Statements Notes and forward- looking Net assets position of Cash Flows statements B.5 p 80 A.6 p 20 Financial position Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity A.7 p 24 B.6 p 82 Overall assessment of the economic position Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements A.8 p 26 Report on expected developments and associated material opportunities and risks A.9 p 38 Siemens AG A.10 p 40 Compensation Report A.11 p 71 Takeover-relevant information Combined Management Report Pages 1 – 74 A.1 Organization of the Siemens Group and basis of pr esentation Siemens is a technology company that is active in nearly all coun- Non-financial matters of the Group tries of the world, focusing on the areas of automation and digi- and Siemens AG talization in the process and manufacturing industries, intelligent Siemens has policies for environmental, employee and social infrastructure for buildings and distributed energy systems, con- matters, for the respect of human rights, and anti-corruption and ventional and renewable power generation and power distribu- bribery matters, among others.