The German Supervisory Board

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The German Supervisory Board The German Supervisory Board: A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors The German Supervisory Board: | A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors The German Supervisory Board: | A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors Contents Foreword Foreword 03 As the world’s economy globalizes, there is often an expectation that business practices will Executive Summary 04 harmonize along with it. This is an expectation The German Supervisory Board: Characteristics and Context 05 that we will see a kind of convergence of corporate The German Supervisory Board in Action: Regular Order, M&A, Crisis 14 governance forms and practices, where boards the world over resemble each other, perhaps Conclusion 15 with a large majority of independent directors, an Endnotes 17 audit committee, a separate chair and CEO, and so on. A lot of this reflects a certain familiarity Claus Buhleier with the Anglo-Saxon board model among Partner, Center for Corporate institutional investors in London and New York. Governance Deloitte Germany [email protected] The reality, however, is quite different. Despite real advances in globalization in other areas, differences in what boards look like and how they work in practice persist across countries. This publication brings to light the differences between the predominant Anglo Saxon, one-tier corporate governance model on the one hand, and the still influential Germanic two-tier-model on the other. The authors, Yvonne Schlaeppi and Michael Marquardt, both experienced corporate directors Kai Bruehl who have served on European company boards, Director, Risk Advisory Deloitte highlight the main characteristics of the German Germany [email protected] supervisory board model and how it demands accountability from its members, despite looking rather different than the combined board model. 02 03 The German Supervisory Board: | A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors The German Supervisory Board: | A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors The German Supervisory Board: Executive Summary Characteristics and Context This two-part article is a primer for US In the second part of this article, light is cast In sum, although at first blush the powers The Dual Board Structure Today Historical Evolution In 1976, Germany’s federal parliament public company directors on the German on the characteristics of the German AG's and authorities set out by the respective German corporate law and its corporate The roots of Germany’s two-tier corporate (Bundestag) passed the Co-Determination two-tier corporate governance model of Supervisory Board—e.g., during a M&A corporate laws seem to be similar (at governance code mandate a two-tier governance model date back to the middle Act, the “Mitbestimmungsgesetz” German publicly traded companies which transaction, a crisis and regular order— its most basic, the Supervisory Board board structure (Supervisory Board and of the 19th century, starting with the first (MitbestG). Although separate from are incorporated as Aktiengesellschaften again by way of contrast to the familiar supervising or controlling management Management Board) for the AG. There are Stock Corporation Act (AktG) in 1843. the country’s Company Act for Public (or “AG’s”).1 Having an understanding of the workings of the US public company board in the form of the Management Board), other German legal entities which have a Companies (Aktiengesetz), it specifies that German Supervisory Board is important at the same junctures. These illustrate how German laws, practice and custom, two-tier board, as well as the rarely used The two-tier system for boards of at most companies with more than 2,000 for US public company directors whose significant characteristics of the Supervisory as well as the presence of employee European stock corporation (Societas companies listed on a stock exchange employees, one half of the Supervisory companies are doing business with a Board, including its composition and scope representatives on larger German Europaea “SE”), which permits having either was initially instituted in Germany in 1861 Board members are to be elected by the German corporation controlled by a of authority, impact its work and function. Supervisory Boards, dictate significant a two-tier or a unitary board.4 In this article, after first having been introduced in the employees. For most companies with 500 to Supervisory Board, or who are considering differences in the German Supervisory however, for simplicity’s sake, we refer only Netherlands in the 17th century. It required 2,000 workers, one third of the Supervisory becoming a Supervisory Board member of a The distance of the German Supervisory Board’s working and function when to the AG when we address the German a Board of Management to run the daily Board members must be elected by German corporation. Board from the Management Board is compared with the US corporate board. two-tier board structure. affairs of the corporation and another, employees. This applies to all German greater than the US public company board There are advantages and disadvantages separate Board of Supervisors to hold corporations, whether publicly listed and The first part of this article sets out the from the CEO and his or her executive team to both systems of corporate governance. To place the two-tier board structure in management accountable and to protect privately held. most significant aspects of the German or “C-Suite.” US public company directors An adequate understanding of the basic a broader international context, quite a the interests of shareholders. AG’s Supervisory Board (Aufsichtsrat) are familiar with and strive to live by the distinctions is a necessity for a US public number of countries other than Germany In practice today German Supervisory and Management Board (also sometimes “Nose In/Fingers Out” dictum; to stay with company director engaged with a German mandate a two-tier board structure for their Employee representation on the Boards of AG’s with more than 2,000 translated into English as the Executive the metaphor, German Supervisory Board publicly traded, multinational AG. publicly listed companies or permit adoption Supervisory Board also has its origins in employees must have 12, 16 or 20 Board or Board of Management) (Vorstand). members may be a good nose length of a two-tier board.5 There are substantial the middle of the 19th century. In 1849, members, none of whom are members of The origins and current characteristics of further away from the CEO and the rest differences among the various national two- the Frankfurt Parliament passed a law the company’s executive management or the German dual-tier board are described of the Management Board. However, in tier board systems. However, additionally that attempted to set the boundaries of Management Board, but some of whom with comparisons to the unitary corporate US business circles and the US business to splitting management and oversight (a corporate power by instituting so called may well be employees serving in lower level board common in the US.2 press the distinctive aspects of the German goal shared with unitary board structures), a “works councils” to better represent management. In the event of a tied Supervisory Board is frequently glossed common goal of two- tier boards is to bring the interests of average workers in the vote between shareholders’ representatives over or ignored.3 representation of the various stakeholders management decision making process.8 and employees’ representatives, the vote of in the company (other than its shareholders) Reforms instituted after World War I the Chair of the Supervisory Board (who is into the company’s corporate governance. aimed at protecting the rights of authors, elected by the shareholders) counts twice. Those stakeholders include shareholders, inventors, and artists also led to ordinary employees, labor unions, business partners, employees nominating their first directors creditors and the public at large, and to Supervisory Boards and thus gaining potentially state ownership.6 a more equal footing with employers.9 Co-determination received its first legal By contrast, the unitary board of US definition in Germany’s Works Council Law companies gives primacy to corporate (Betriebsrätegesetz) in 1920. governance by and for the shareholders. This form of corporate governance has evolved to effectively allow the board to monitor the company on behalf of a widely dispersed shareholder base.7 04 05 The German Supervisory Board: | A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors The German Supervisory Board: | A Practical Introduction for US Public Company Directors The Role and Characteristics of the The Supervisory Board may only act It is important to recognize the distinctive The powers and procedures of any German Supervisory Board of an AG on behalf of the AG if prior approval legal obligation of each member of particular German AG’s Supervisory The German word for Supervisory Board, and authority is granted by the a German Supervisory Board to be Board are further delineated in its Articles Aufsichtsrat, makes it abundantly clear that Management Board. focused on the interests of the “corporate of Association and Bylaws (Satzung, the central mission of this body is to serve as enterprise” only, whether that Supervisory Geschäftsordnung and/or Statuten), the a “check” on management. In German, the In supervising and advising the Management Board member is elected by shareholders
Recommended publications
  • Rules Governing the Share Capital of German Public Companies by Frank Wooldridge
    Rules governing the share capital of German public companies by Frank Wooldridge he above rules are somewhat detailed and some - company. However, it contains detailed rules governing times rather complex. A good elementary account the maintenance of capital. Certain of these rules, Tof them by Schneider and Heidenhain is given in including the prohibition imposed on a public company The German Stock Corporation Act ( 2nd ed, pub Kluwer, subscribing for its own shares contained in paragraph 2000) which has been of considerable interest and help to 56 (1) AktG are considered below. The imposition of the author of this article. ancillary obligations upon shareholders is also considered below, where the rules governing the increase and The articles of a public company ( Aktiengesellschaft ) are reduction of capital, which are rather complex, are dealt required to specify the amount of the company’s share with in outline. capital, which has to be denominated in euros. The minimum capital of a public company is at present THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 56 AKTG €50,000 (para 7 AktG ). As in the United Kingdom, shares may be issued without a par value ( Stückaktien ) or with one The most important of the abov e provisions would (Nennbetragsaktien ) (para 8(2) AktG ). Par value shares are seem to be those contained in paragraph 56(1) and 562) required to have the value of one euro or a multiple thereof AktG . Paragraph 56(1) AktG provides that a company may (para 8(2) AktG ). The shares in an Aktiengesellschaft are not subscribe for its own shares. Any purported indivisible, as are the rights attaching to each share.
    [Show full text]
  • Volkswagen Supervisory Board Agrees on Management Positions and Reorganisation of Group Board – Stronger Focus on Costs Planned
    Media information NO. 300/2020 Volkswagen Supervisory Board agrees on management positions and reorganisation of Group Board – stronger focus on costs planned • Supervisory Board: “Herbert Diess and his new Board of Management team have full support for implementation of Together 2025+ strategy” • Dr. Arno Antlitz will succeed Chief Financial Officer Frank Witter • Murat Aksel will take over Group Purchasing Division • Newly created Group Board of Management function “Technology” will be headed by Thomas Schmall • Wolfsburg will become showcase site for the highly automated production of electric vehicles Wolfsburg, December 14, 2020 – During its meeting today, the Supervisory Board of Volkswagen AG dealt extensively with the Together 2025+ strategy and, in connection with this, a realignment of personnel. The Board unanimously resolved to give its full support to the strategy, in particular the orientation of the company towards electromobility and digitalisation. This results in the following realignment of personnel resolved by the Supervisory Board: - Dr. Arno Antlitz, currently member of the Board of Management of AUDI AG responsible for Finance and Legal Affairs, will succeed Frank Witter as Group CFO, with the latter’s contract, as is known, expiring at his own request at the end of June 2021. Dr. Antlitz’s primary focus will be on further efficiency increases. - As part of the redesigning of the Group Board of Management, the areas of responsibility Procurement and Components will be separated from each other. A new Group Board of Management function, “Technology”, will be set up. It will be led from 1 January 2021 on by Thomas Schmall, currently Chief Executive Officer of Volkswagen Group Components.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Procedure of the Supervisory Board of Symrise AG The
    Rules of Procedure of the Supervisory Board of Symrise AG The Supervisory Board of Symrise AG hereby enacts the following rules of procedure: § 1 Duties of the Supervisory Board (1) The Supervisory Board shall advise and supervise the Board of Management in its management of the Company. It shall work closely with the Executive Board for the benefit of the Company. (2) The Supervisory Board shall discharge its duties in compliance with statutory law, the articles of association, and these rules of procedure. It shall comply with the recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Codex, unless the compliance statement of the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board pursuant to sec. 161 of the Stock Corporation Act provides otherwise. (3) The Supervisory Board shall debate and decide on matters relating to the Executive Board if proposed by the Personnel Committee (sec. 9), and on the scheme of compensation of the members of the Executive Board and shall review such scheme regularly. § 2 Membership on the Supervisory Board (1) The Supervisory Board shall have twelve members. Six members shall be elected by the General Meeting and six members shall be elected by the employees of the company pursuant to the Co-Determination Act. (2) Each member of the Supervisory Board must have the knowledge, the skills, and the professional experience required to properly discharge his duties taking into account the internationality of the business. Members of the Supervisory Board shall themselves be responsible for arranging the training and continuing education required for the discharge of their duties. The Supervisory Board must include a sufficient number of independent members to guarantee independent advice and supervision of the Executive Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
    HORIZON THERAPEUTICS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AMENDED EFFECTIVE: 18 FEBRUARY 2021 PURPOSE AND POLICY The primary purpose of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Horizon Therapeutics Public Limited Company, an Irish public limited company (the “Company”), shall be to oversee all aspects of the Company’s corporate governance functions on behalf of the Board, including to (i) make recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance issues; (ii) identify, review and evaluate candidates to serve as directors of the Company consistent with criteria approved by the Board and review and evaluate incumbent directors; (iii) serve as a focal point for communication between such candidates, non-committee directors and the Company’s management; (iv) nominate candidates to serve as directors; and (v) make other recommendations to the Board regarding affairs relating to the directors of the Company. The Committee shall also provide oversight assistance in connection with the Company’s legal, regulatory and ethical compliance programs, policies and procedures as established by management and the Board. The operation of the Committee and this Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter shall be subject to the constitution of the Company as in effect from time to time and the Irish Companies Act 2014, as amended by the Irish Companies (Amendment) Act 2017, the Irish Companies (Accounting) Act 2017 and as may be subsequently amended, updated or replaced from time to time (the “Companies Act”). COMPOSITION The Committee shall consist of at least two members of the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Claus Hecking
    Curriculum Vitae Claus Hecking Personal Profile • Dedicated journalist with a nose for exclusive news and a passion for op-eds and non-mainstream feature stories. • Eleven years experience as a staff writer and author for leading print and digital media such as Die Zeit, Spiegel Online and Financial Times Germany. Main topics: EU politics and policy, international finance and global economics. • Experience as a Brussels correspondent and as a Frankfurt correspondent who knows how to explain complex topics to a broad audience and who speaks several languages fluently. • Multimedia storyteller who writes stories, takes pictures, videos and audios. Experience Economics Correspondent , Die Zeit / Zeit.de, Hamburg (January 2015 to present) • Covering European and global economy, EU, finance, energy, environment, aviation. • Created “Countdown für das Klima” (“countdown for the climate”), a 13 week-long series of articles about the UN climate conference in Paris. Contracted Author , Spiegel Online, Hamburg & Freelancer, Die Zeit (2013 to 2014) • Covering European and global economy, EU, finance, energy, environment, creation of multimedia features (video, photo, audio, infographics, text) , • Created “Was wurde aus=?6 (3What happened to=?61, a series of articles about persons/events/places/topics that once made headline news and have disappeared from the public radar in the last years. • 2.14: 8omination for the German- rench ,ournalist Prize and one shortlist nomination for the German ,ournalist Prize. Blogger , Total Global, www.total-global.info (2.14 to present1 • Private blog about international economy, globalization and the EU. International Correspondent , 2apital, Berlin (2.12 to 2.141 • 2overing European : global economy, EU, energy, finance, aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in the Federal Republic of Germany
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 3 Number 2 Fall Article 4 May 2020 Doing Business in the Federal Republic of Germany Georg Kutschelis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Georg Kutschelis, Doing Business in the Federal Republic of Germany, 3 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 197 (1973). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. DOING BUSINESS IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY* GEORG KUTSCHELIS** I. INTRODUCTION II. PRELIMINARY FORMALITIES A. Residence permit (Aufenthaltserlaubnis) B. Labor permit (Arbeitserlaubnis) C. Registration of business (Gewerbeanmeldung) D. Registration of foreign corporate bodies III. LEGAL ORGANIZATION OF A BUSINESS A. Statutory background B. Some peculiarities of German commercial law 1. Kinds of merchants 2. Commercial register 3. Commercial name (Firma) 4. Commercial agency C. Criteria of companies 1. Capacity to hold legal rights (Rechtsfaehigkeit) 2. The dichotomy of company and association 3. Internal and external companies 4. Person-companies and capital-companies 5. Ownership of company assets D. Kinds of Companies 1. Private law company (Gesellschaft buergerlichen- Rechts) 2. Partnership (Offene Handelsgesellschaft) 3. Limited partnership (Kommanditgesellschaft) 4. Silent partnership (Stille Gesellschaft) 5. Stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) 6. Partnership limited by shares (Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien) 7. Limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit besch- raenkterHaftung) 8. Limited liability company and partner (GmbH & Co KG) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership and Control of Private Firms
    WJEC BUSINESS STUDIES A LEVEL 2008 Spec. Issue 2 2012 Page 1 RESOURCES. Ownership and Control of Private Firms. Introduction Sole traders are the most popular of business Business managers as a businesses steadily legal forms, owned and often run by a single in- grows in size, are in the main able to cope, dividual they are found on every street corner learn and develop new skills. Change is grad- in the country. A quick examination of a busi- ual, there are few major shocks. Unfortu- ness directory such as yellow pages, will show nately business growth is unlikely to be a that there are thousands in every town or city. steady process, with regular growth of say There are both advantages and disadvantages 5% a year. Instead business growth often oc- to operating as a sole trader, and these are: curs as rapid bursts, followed by a period of steady growth, then followed again by a rapid Advantages. burst in growth.. Easy to set up – it is just a matter of in- The change in legal form of business often forming the Inland Revenue that an individ- mirrors this growth pattern. The move from ual is self employed and registering for sole trader to partnership involves injections class 2 national insurance contributions of further capital, move into new markets or within three months of starting in business. market niches. The switch from partnership Low cost – no legal formalities mean there to private limited company expands the num- is little administrative costs to setting up ber of manager / owners, moves and rear- as a sole trader.
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/22675 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/22675 19. Wahlperiode 18.09.2020 Schriftliche Fragen mit den in der Woche vom 14. September 2020 eingegangenen Antworten der Bundesregierung Verzeichnis der Fragenden Abgeordnete Nummer Abgeordnete Nummer der Frage der Frage Achelwilm, Doris (DIE LINKE.) ...................1 Fricke, Otto (FDP) ............................47, 97 Akbulut, Gökay (DIE LINKE.) .................. 31 Gastel, Matthias Alt, Renata (FDP) ............................... 111 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 98 Amtsberg, Luise Göring-Eckardt, Katrin (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 16 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 65 Bartsch, Dietmar, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ............. 82 Gohlke, Nicole (DIE LINKE.) .............. 18, 113 Bauer, Nicole (FDP) ..........................76, 77 Hahn, André, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ................. 71 Bause, Margarete Hanke, Reginald (FDP) .......................54, 83 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 32 Held, Marcus (SPD) ........................ 99, 100 Bayaz, Danyal, Dr. Helling-Plahr, Katrin (FDP) ...................... 55 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................2, 3 Hemmelgarn, Udo Theodor (AfD) .......... 66, 101 Bayram, Canan Herbrand, Markus (FDP) ........................7, 8 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ...............53, 80 Hess, Martin (AfD) ...................19, 20, 21, 56 Brantner, Franziska, Dr. (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ...........17, 33, 34 Hessel, Katja (FDP) ................................9 Buchholz, Christine (DIE LINKE.) ............35, 36 Höchst, Nicole
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Mandates and Functions Held by Members of the Management Board
    LIST OF THE MANDATES AND FUNCTIONS HELD BY MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Member of the Mandate and Management functions held Other mandates and functions held Board within the Company Troy Cooper Chief Executive Operations Director Officer XPO LOGISTICS Administrator XPO CARTAGE, INC. XPO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. Patrick Member of the Chairman Bataillard Managment Board ND RED EUROPE TDG LOGISTICS Financial Director OMEGA XXIII OMEGA XXIV OMEGA XXV Deputy Managing Director NDT Managing Director ND RED EUROPE NDL INTERNATIONAL NDO HOLDING USA INC. NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE OVERSEAS NDO TDG LOGISTICS Director AJG INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT LIMITED CHRISTIAN SALVESEN INVESTMENTS LIMITED HARRIS DISTRIBUTION LIMITED IWT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS LIMITED LAMBDA 2 LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE LOGISTICS UK LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE HOLDINGS LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE LOGISTICS IRELAND LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE LOGISTICS LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE MAINTENANCE UK LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE OVERSEAS HK LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE OVERSEAS IRELAND LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE OVERSEAS UK LIMITED 1 141 217.1 NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE TANKERS LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE TRANSPORT IRELAND LIMITED NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE TRANSPORT SERVICES LIMITED SALVESEN LOGISTICS HOLDINGS LIMITED SALVESEN LOGISTICS LIMITED SHEDDICK TRANSPORT LIMITED T.D. HOLDINGS B.V. TCG EAST & SOUTH B.V. TDG (UK) LIMITED TDG AVONMOUTH LIMITED TDG LIMITED THE NATURAL VEGETABLE COMPANY LIMITED NDL HOLDING USA INC JACOBSON LOGISTICS COMPANY INC. JACOBSON PACKAGING COMPANY LC JACOBSON STAFFING COMPANY LC JACOBSON TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INC. JACOBSON WAREHOUSE COMPANY INC. JHCI ACQUISITION INC. JHCI HOLDINGS INC. Manager GREEN LOGISTICS LIMITED IMMOTRANS NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE OVERSEAS SPAIN SL NORBERT DENTRESSANGLE TRANSPORT UK LIMITED OMEGA XX OMEGA XXI OMEGA XXII TEXLOG TRANSIMMO PICARDIE Director FIEGE BORRUSO S.P.A. FIEGE LOGISTICS ITALIA S.P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Active Bayer Companies with at Least a Share of 50% Last Update: 17.8.2020 Country Company
    List of active Bayer companies with at least a share of 50% last update: 17.8.2020 Country Company Algeria Bayer Algerie S.P.A. Argentina Bayer S.A. Argentina Biagro S.A. Argentina Monsanto Argentina SRL Australia Bayer Australia Limited Australia Bayer CropScience Holdings Pty Ltd Australia Bayer CropScience Pty Limited Australia Cotton Growers Services Pty. Limited Australia Imaxeon Pty. Ltd. Australia Monsanto Australia Pty Ltd Bangladesh Bayer CropScience Ltd. Belgium Bayer Agriculture BVBA Belgium Bayer CropScience NV Belgium Bayer NV Bermuda MonSure Limited Bolivia Bayer Boliviana Ltda Bolivia Monsanto Bolivia S.A. Bosnia & Herzeg. Bayer d.o.o. Sarajevo Brazil Alkagro do Brasil Ltda Brazil Bayer S.A. Brazil D&PL Brasil Ltda Brazil Monsanto do Brasil Ltda. Brazil Rede Agro Fidelidade e Intermediacao S.A. Brazil Schering do Brasil Química e Farmacêutica Ltda. Brazil Stoneville Brasil Ltda. Bulgaria Bayer Bulgaria EOOD Burkina Faso Monsanto Burkina Faso SARL Chile Bayer Finance & Portfolio Management S.A. Chile Bayer Finance Ltda. Chile Bayer S.A. Chile Monsanto Chile, S.A. Costa Rica Bayer Business Services Costa Rica, SRL Costa Rica Bayer Medical S.R.L. Costa Rica Bayer S.A. Curacao Pianosa B.V. Germany Adverio Pharma GmbH - 1 - List of active Bayer companies with at least a share of 50% last update: 17.8.2020 Country Company Germany AgrEvo Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH Germany Alcafleu Management GmbH & Co. KG Germany BGI Deutschland GmbH Germany Bayer 04 Immobilien GmbH Germany Bayer 04 Leverkusen Fußball GmbH Germany Bayer 04 Leverkusen
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures and Stories Since 1957 from Our Lives 12.2018 Since 1847
    PICTURES AND STORIES SINCE 1957 FROM OUR LIVES 12.2018 SINCE 1847 Our brand is growing AWARD FOR EDITORIAL BEST BRAND The seventh coup in 2018: LIQUI MOLY voted Dear LIQUI MOLY Friends, the best lubricant brand by sporty drivers, too SUPERLIQUI? WONDERMOLY? ... What name would you give to our heroic unit right now? What our LIQUI MOLY family worldwide is currently accomplishing as we move into the finishing straight of 2018 is nothing short of superhuman. Yet it is precisely the human component that sets us apart from the rest and makes us The readers of "sport auto" capable of such an impressive final sprint. We stick together, we fight together and we have voted: for some 75 % win together! Our sales of EUR 53.8 million in the month of October – an absolute record of survey participants in the history of the company, the outstanding online campaign with more than 1.6 billion we are once again adverts worldwide and being voted Best Brand by readers of the magazine “sport auto” – the best oil brand! an amazing seventh award this year: these are just three examples of how our unique Many thanks for this winner mentality has borne fruit. impressive result! But don’t forget to take a closer look: it’s not just the big numbers and awards that regularly catapult us up front in terms of consumer preference. There are also lots of ways in which we collect bonus points on a small scale all round the globe. A blue, white and red garage sign on a busy road, a useful piece of advice given on our friendly Technical Hotline, a container delivery organized in the face of a mountain of difficulties – there are more than enough opportunities to demonstrate our superhuman powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Liability Partnerships
    inbrief Limited Liability Partnerships Inside Key features Incorporation and administration Members’ Agreements Taxation inbrief Introduction Key features • any members’ agreement is a confidential Introduction document; and It first became possible to incorporate limited Originally conceived as a vehicle liability partnerships (“LLPs”) in the UK in 2001 • the accounting and filing requirements are for use by professional practices to after the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 essentially the same as those for a company. obtain the benefit of limited liability came into force. LLPs have an interesting An LLP can be incorporated with two or more background. In the late 1990s some of the major while retaining the tax advantages of members. A company can be a member of an UK accountancy firms faced big negligence claims a partnership, LLPs have a far wider LLP. As noted, it is a distinct legal entity from its and were experiencing a difficult market for use as is evidenced by their increasing members and, accordingly, can contract and own professional indemnity insurance. Their lobbying property in its own right. In this respect, as in popularity as an alternative business of the Government led to the introduction of many others, an LLP is more akin to a company vehicle in a wide range of sectors. the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 which than a partnership. The members of an LLP, like gave birth to the LLP as a new business vehicle in the shareholders of a company, have limited the UK. LLPs were originally seen as vehicles for liability. As he is an agent, when a member professional services partnerships as demonstrated contracts on behalf of the LLP, he binds the LLP as by the almost immediate conversion of the major a director would bind a company.
    [Show full text]