DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Journal C 287 Volume 35 of the European Communities 4 November 1992

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Journal C 287 Volume 35 of the European Communities 4 November 1992 ISSN 0378-6986 Official Journal C 287 Volume 35 of the European Communities 4 November 1992 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I Information II Preparatory Acts Economic and Social Committee Session of july 1992 92/C 287/01 Opinion on the Proposal for a Council Decision approving certain amendments to the agreement for cooperation in dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances, as signed in Bonn on 13 September 1983 1 92/C 287/02 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to lifts 2 92/C 287/03 Opinion on 'Europe 2000 : Outlook for the development of the Community's territory' 5 92/C 287/04 Opinion on : — the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) introducing a Declaration of European Interest to facilitate the establishment of trans-European net­ works in the transport domain, — the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) introducing a Declaration of European Interest to facilitate the establishment of trans-European net­ works in the electricity and natural gas domain, and — the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) introducing a Declaration of European Interest to facilitate the establishment of trans-European net­ works in the telecommunications domain 12 2 ( Continued overleaf) Notice No Contents (Continued) Page 92/C 287/05 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the transfer of controls in the field of road and inland waterway transport to the Community's external frontiers 14 92/C 287/06 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 on Community measures to improve and adapt structures in the fisheries and aquaculture sector 15 92/C 287/07 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive providing for changes to the Seventh Council Directive on aid to shipbuilding of 21 December 1990 ... 16 92/C 287/08 Opinion on 'Adoption' 18 92/C 287/09 Opinion on the proposal for a Resolution of the Council of the European Communities on a Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development 27 92/C 287/10 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to labelling of the materials used in the main components of footwear for sale to the final consumer 36 92/C 287/ 11 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Decision concerning the approval of the additional Protocol to the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe 38 92/C 287/12 Opinion on the 'First Report on the Application of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers' 39 92/C 287/13 Opinion on 'Social Developments in the Community in 1991 ' 48 92/C 287/14 Opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights 53 4 . 11 . 92 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 287/ 1 II (Preparatory Acts) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE Opinion on the Proposal for a Council Decision approving certain amendments to the agreement for cooperation in dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances, as signed in Bonn on 13 September 1983 ( 92/C 287/01 ) On 5 May 1992 the Council decided to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Article 130S of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, on the abovementioned proposal . The Section for Protection of the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Affairs, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its Opinion on 2 June 1992. The Rapporteur was Mr Gafo Fernandez . At its 298th Plenary Session ( meeting of 1 July 1992) the Economic and Social Committee adopted the following Opinion . 1 . The Committee approves this Commission initiat­ 4. Although the signatories to the Agreement (Con­ ive to bring up to date and improve the technical and tracting Parties) are states, the oil and marine transport preventive aspects of the Agreement initially signed in industries should also be involved in the implemen­ 1984. tation of the Agreements. The Agreements already pro­ vide mechanisms for cooperation on the prevention and handling of spills of oil and other dangerous substances, and on financing these activities and the consequent civil liabilities. However, it is essential that these sectors be more intensively involved, with more activities in 2. The eight years which have elapsed since the initial the field of prevention and exchanges of technical infor­ Agreement was signed demonstrate the need to comp­ mation and data . lement corrective activities with measures to improve information and prevention systems. This new philos­ ophy is in line with the Community's environmental objectives laid down in Article 130R of the EEC Treaty . 5 . The Committee welcomes the definition of the Contracting Parties' surveillance duties in their exclus­ ive zones of responsibility and the conclusion of agree­ ments with other contracting parties to these ends. 3 . The Committee is pleased to see this preventive philosophy extended to both the objectives of the Agree­ ment and practical aspects, such as greater cooperation 6. The Committee also welcomes the change in the between the Contracting Parties and the regular demarcation zone of the Skagerrak, which rectifies an exchange of technical and surveillance data. error in the initial agreement. No C 287/2 Official Journal of the European Communities 4. 11 . 92 7. Finally, the Committee would like to draw amendments, approved in September 1989, will have attention to the need to accelerate and promote taken three years to be ratified by the Contracting the implementation of the Agreements. The present Parties. Done at Brussels, 1 July 1992. The Chairman of the Economic and Social Committee Michael GEUENICH Opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to lifts 0 ) (92/C 287/02) On 4 March 1992 the Council decided to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Article 100A of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, on the abovementioned proposal . The Section for Industry, Commerce, Crafts and Services, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its Opinion on 10 June 1992. The Rapporteur was Mr Pearson . At its 298th Plenary Session ( meeting of 1 July 1992 ) the Economic and Social Committee adopted unanimously the following Opinion . 1 . Introduction 1 .4. The Committee notes the assurance of the Com­ mission that with the repeal of Directive 84/529/EEC, 1.1 . The Committee particularly welcomes the pro­ there will be no reduction in safety standards . The posals to replace Directive 84/529/EEC (2) — and as Committee however thinks that a CEN harmonized twice amended — as it has, since 27 February 1976, standard would be of advantage; it should serve as a consistently called for a Directive in which provision is basis and point of reference for manufacturers within made for total harmonization . the Member States : it would include minimum detailed safety requirements for the protection of users . 1.2 . The Committee further notes with satisfaction that the new Directive is based on the 'new approach' system, whereby the anomalies created between Com­ munity and national requirements will be eliminated : 2. General comments these requirements will be mandatory and not voluntary as hitherto . 2.1 . The Committee welcomes the proposed Direc­ 1.3 . As the title shows, the new proposals include all tive which sets clear improved standards for new lifts . types of lifts which are accessible to people; they do, however, apply only to new lifts installed in permanent buildings . 2.2. The Committee believes that the Commission should review and upgrade the safety requirements for existing lifts, setting a common harmonized standard . í 1 ) OJ No C62, 11 . 3 . 1992, p. 4. Analysis of accident records should be involved in such (2) OJ No L300, 19 . 11 . 1984 . a review . 4 . 11 . 92 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 287/3 2.3 . There are a number of Directives which are c) The Committee is aware that the Commission docu­ contingent upon one another : 'machines', 'lifting equip­ ment refers to a maximum permitted inclination ment', 'lifts' and elements of the Construction Products angle of 15 degrees from vertical : manufacturers, of Directive. The Commission and the Council should be recent date, relate to angle deviation from horizontal very careful that the requirements of these Directives and the Commission should consult on this point do not contradict and that there should be as much and thus a change to maximum permitted level of alignment as possible . 75 degrees from vertical would apply . This change is to facilitate modern design of lifts in public areas which will enable, for example, greater facilities for 2.4. In Directive 84/529/EEC ( Article 2.2) attention the disabled. is drawn to fire protection in the construction of a building housing a lift. The importance of this element 3.1.3 . Article 1 ( 3 ) should be reiterated in the current Directive particularly in view of the increasing provision of fire-fighting lifts The Committee understands that the Directive will in high-rise buildings . include lifts for domestic buildings, lifts for the disabled and goods-only lifts but amongst common examples of those not included in the provisions are lifting platforms 2.5 . Article 7 ( 1 ) ( 2) and (3 ) concerns lifts and safety without cars, escalators and ski-lifts and funiculars . components bearing the CE mark which do not con­ form to the required safety standard, and which have 3.1.4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Road to Poreign Adoptions Gets Rock- Février 1990 (P. 13
    ANNEXE A* -<<Roadto Poreign Adoptions Gets Rock- 1 INTRODUCTION ier», The Christian Science Monitor, 28 février 1990(p. 13), A Historique du projet ANNEXE B* - «Exploitation of Working Children and StreetChildrerw, UNICEF, ExecutiveBoard, 1 A sa Seizièmesession, tenue à La Haye du 3 au 20 1986Session, E/ICEF/1986/CRP.3, p. 13-16. octobre 1988,la Conférencede La Haye de droit inter- national privé a décidé ANNEXE C -Tableau synoptique des lois matérielles en «d’ inscrire à l’ ordre du jour des travaux de la Dix-sep- matièred ’ adoption d’ enfants, infra, p. 102. tième session l’ élaboration d’ une convention sur l’ adop- tion d’ enfants en provenance de l’ étranger» et a chargéle ANNEXE D” - Conventioninteraméricaine sur les conflits Secrétaire général «d’ entreprendre les travaux prélimi- de lois en matière d’ adoption de mineurs, naires et de convoquer une Commission spéciale à cet Série sur les Traités, OEA, No 62. effet)). La réciséqu ’ elle estimait ANNEXE E* - Convention européenne en matière «indispensable la présence au sein de cette Commission Série des traités d’ adoption des enfants, spéciale des Etats non membres d’ où proviennent beau- européens, No 58. coup de ces enfants» et a prié «le Secrétaire général de faire de son mieux pour obtenir leur participation aux ANNEXE F - Working Arrangement Between the Phil- travaux à titre de Membre ad hoc»? ippine Ministry of Social Servicesand De- velopment and the Australian States and 2 Un lien étroit était ainsi établi entre la décisiond ’ ins- Territories Adoption Authorities on Inter- crire le sujet de l’ adoption d’ enfants en provenancede country Adoption, infra, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Adoptions
    ICAV Perspective Paper Illicit Intercountry Adoptions Lived Experience Views on How Authorities and Bodies Could Respond Compiled by Lynelle Long, July 2020 WWW.INTERCOUNTRYADOPTEEVOICES.COM ICAV PERSPECTIVE PAPER 1 Introduction n the past, ICAV Perspective Papers have brought together a range of views on a specific topic from intercountry adoptees all over the world. The goal of these Ipapers have been to raise greater understanding of the complexities we live. This paper attempts to bring together not only the voices and experiences of impacted intercountry adoptees who have lived experience with some form of illicit practice in their adoption, but we also include for the first time, a few adoptive parents and first family representation. For the purpose of this paper, we will use the term illicit adoption practice because it includes illegal adoptions but its meaning can also extend to unethical practices. Sometimes adoption practices are technically legal under the law of the relevant country but are fundamentally unethical under international or other standards such as the CRC, the Optional Protocol (Sale of Children), and the Palermo Protocol. Illicit practices can vary immensely but in general, participants experienced one or more of these 3 categories of instances: one category of illicit practices are instances where the child never should have been removed from (or should have been returned to) their family; a second group deals with subsidiarity in the sense that while it may have been necessary for the child not to be with their family, in-country solutions should have been used; then there are wrongs that go to matching--- such as falsified child study forms — in instances where an adoption could have been appropriate, but the wrongdoing led to creating a placement that was problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Greater Capacity: Learning from Intercountry Adoption Breakdowns Towards a Greater Capacity: Learning from Intercountry Adoption Breakdowns 1
    Towards a greater capacity: Learning from intercountry adoption breakdowns Towards a greater capacity: Learning from intercountry adoption breakdowns 1 To Chantal Saclier For her profound humanity and humility, her contribution to the development of the rights of children deprived of their families and her faith in change – a constant inspiration in my daily commitment. 2 Towards a greater capacity: Learning from intercountry adoption breakdowns Published by: Author: Cécile Jeannin International Social Service Co-authors: Bernadette Abejo, Ana Berástegui Pedro- Viejo, Bernadette Bonkoungou, Laurie C. Miller, Claudia International Centre of Reference for the Rights of Children Cabral, Sitara Chamot and Sinta, Marco Chistolini, Deprived of their Family Dr. Fanny Cohen Herlem, Janie Cravens, Frédérique 32 Quai du Seujet Delatour, Christine Delepière, Maria Doré, Ina Dulanjani 1201 Geneva, Switzerland Dygaard, Violeta Elefterie, Lina M. Estrada Jaramillo, Laura Ferrari, Patricia Fronek, Céline Giraud, Gaëlle Grilo, Anna Guerrieri, Alicia Aguilar Gutiérrez, Bente © International Social Service 2018. Hoseth, Odeta Inte, Jesús M. Jiménez-Morazo, All rights reserved. All reproductions, copies or diffusions Jaime Ledesma del Busto, Johanne Lemieux, Monica of this publication are prohibited without the publisher/ Malaguti, Sophie Marinopoulos, Laura Martínez- editor’s approval. Mora, Dr. Ulrike Möller-Bierth, Raquel Morales, Javier Múgica Flores, Victoria Musatova, Jesús Palacios, Design and illustrations: www.transformbrands.co.uk Carmen Paniagua, Nathalie Parent, Sandrine Pépit, Dr. Marie Odile Pérouse de Montclos, Sandi Petersen, ISBN: 978-2-9701140-4-8 Julien Pierron, Sonia Ranieri, Alberto Rodriguez Gonzalez, Rosa Rosnati, Chantal Saclier, Alphonsine T. Sawadogo, Ruth Schürbüscher, Frédéric Sorge, Lizley Tantaleán and Cite as: Anna Taxell. Jeannin, C. (Ed.) (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Care for Children Around the Globe
    Alternative Care for Children Around the Globe A desk review of the child welfare situation in all countries of the world Florence Koenderink Alternative Care for Children Around the Globe A desk review of the child welfare situation in all countries in the world Florence Koenderink Table of Contents Why Family-Based Solutions • Acknowledgements , p8 • Glossary, p9 • Abbreviations, p11 • Introduction, p12 5 • Methodology, p13 • Limitations, p18 • Country Information by Continent: Africa, p21: - Algeria - Liberia - Angola - Libya - Benin - Madagascar - Botswana - Malawi - Burkina Faso - Mali - Burundi - Mauritania - Cabo Verde - Mauritius - Cameroon - Morocco - Central African Republic - Mozambique - Chad - Namibia - Comoros - Niger - Congo (Democratic Republic of the) - Nigeria - Congo (Republic) - Rwanda - Côte D’Ivoire - São Tomè e Princípe - Djibouti - Senegal - Egypt - Seychelles - Equatorial Guinea - Sierra Leone - Eritrea - Somalia - Eswatini - South Africa - Ethiopia - South Sudan - Gabon - Sudan - The Gambia - Tanzania (United Republic of) - Ghana - Togo - Guinea - Tunisia - Guinea-Bissau - Uganda - Kenya - Zambia - Lesotho - Zimbabwe Copyright © Florence Koenderink 2019 The Americas, p133 All rights reserved - Antigua and Barbuda - Canada Why Family-Based Solutions - Argentina - Chile www.familybasedsolutions.org - Bahamas - Colombia - Barbados - Costa Rica Layout: Bert Koenderink - Belize - Cuba Cover photo: Florence Koenderink - Bolivia (Plurinational State of) - Dominica Editing: Tekstbureau Zoals het woord - Brazil - Domican
    [Show full text]
  • Child Adoption: Trendspoliciesand Child Adoption: Trends and Policies
    Child Adoption: Trends and Policies Trends Adoption: Child Child Adoption: Trends and Policies USD 58 ISBN 978-92-1-151466-7 Printed at the United Nations, New York 09-65249—March 2010—5,725 [blank page] ST/ESA/SER.A/292 Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division Child Adoption: Trends and Policies United Nations New York, 2009 DESA The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The designations “developed” and “developing” countries and “more developed” and “less developed” regions are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Adoption.Pdf
    Full adoption in England and Wales and France: a comparative history of law and practice (1926-2015) Jean-François Mignot To cite this version: Jean-François Mignot. Full adoption in England and Wales and France: a comparative history of law and practice (1926-2015). Adoption and Fostering, SAGE Publications, 2017, 34, pp.87 - 158. 10.1177/0308575917704551. halshs-01571262 HAL Id: halshs-01571262 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01571262 Submitted on 1 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Adoption & Fostering, Vol 41 /Issue 2, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd, All rights reserved. © Jean-François Mignot Full adoption in England and Wales and France: a comparative history of law and practice (1926‒2015)i Jean-François Mignot Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France Abstract Why do the British adopt far fewer children from abroad but more domestic children than the French? To examine this question, this article compares the history of adoption law and practice in France and England and Wales. Although these countries have had similar adoption laws since the 1920s, there have long been many more adoptions in England and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Adoption in Western Europe, 1900-2015 Jean-François Mignot
    Child Adoption in Western Europe, 1900-2015 Jean-François Mignot To cite this version: Jean-François Mignot. Child Adoption in Western Europe, 1900-2015. Cliometrics of the Family, 2019. halshs-02008838 HAL Id: halshs-02008838 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02008838 Submitted on 5 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Jean-François Mignot [email protected] Gemass, CNRS Child Adoption in Western Europe, 1900-20151 Cliometrics of the Family. Global Patterns and Their Impact on Diverging Development Summary This chapter is a first step towards a comparative history of child adoption law and practices in Western Europe since child adoption became legal in Germany (1900), Sweden (1917), France (1923), England and Wales (1927) and Italy (1942). Relying mainly on long time series from these five countries, I analyze the incidence and the developments of domestic adoptions of both unrelated and related children as well as more recent developments in inter-country adoption. In most Western European countries child adoption incidence increased from the early 20th century to approximately the 1970s, likely because of rising demand for child adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Flemish Region of Belgium Information for Follow-Up Purposes Name And
    QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PRACTICAL OPERATION OF THE 1993 ADOPTION CONVENTION Prel. Doc. 3 of February 2020 for the Special Commission meeting in 2021 Name of State: Flemish region of Belgium Information for follow-up purposes Name and title of contact person: Ariane Van den Berhe, Director Name of Authority / Office Flemish Central Authority for Adoption Telephone number: +32 (0)2 533 14 89 E-mail address: [email protected] 1. POST-ADOPTION MATTERS 1.1. Preservation of, and access to, information Both States of origin and receiving States 1.1.1. Preservation of information and use of data 1. Has your State centralised, in a public facility, information concerning the child’s origins and the adoption of the child? Yes. Please specify where the information is centralised: The Flemish Central Authority (hereafter: VCA) stores copies from all adoptions since Belgium ratified the Hague Convention (2005). VCA does efforts to centralize all adoption files dated before and since 2005 (as well as the files to be found in our archives). No. Please specify where the information is stored: Please insert text here 2. Has your State encountered situations where personal data obtained during the intercountry adoption process has been misused (see Art. 31 of the Convention)? Yes. Please provide details of the types of situations your State encountered and the action(s) taken in response: Please insert text here No. 1.1.2. Search for origins 3. Is there a specialised programme or section in the Central Authority which deals with the search for the origins of an adoptee? Yes. Please provide its name and explain the services provided: There is a staff member who answers every question for roots search.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption in France: Revival of an Old Institution (1804-2007) Jean-François Mignot
    ”Simple” adoption in France: Revival of an old institution (1804-2007) Jean-François Mignot To cite this version: Jean-François Mignot. ”Simple” adoption in France: Revival of an old institution (1804-2007). Revue française de sociologie, Presse de Sciences Po / Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 2016, 56 (3), pp.525-560. 10.3917/rfs.563.0525. halshs-01407701 HAL Id: halshs-01407701 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01407701 Submitted on 2 Dec 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. "Simple" adoption in France: Revival of an old institution (1804-2007) Jean-François MIGNOT Along with so-called "full" adoption, there is in France another form known as "simple" adoption, which adds an additional descendency tie to the adoptee's tie with his family of origin. Nowadays, this form of adoption is mostly used by a step-parent without children to adopt an adult stepchild to whom there is already an attachment in order to transmit his/her estate to it. Simple adoption, about which little is known by sociologists of the family, has now become more common than full adoption. Using historical statistics from the Ministry of Justice on simple adoption since the nineteenth century, we trace the history of this institution since 1804 when it became part of French law.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Adoption System in Some States in the EU and America
    RESEARCH ASSOCIATION for RAIS INTERDISCIPLINARY JUNE 2019 STUDIES DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3267914 Adoption System in Some States in the EU and America Silvia Timofti Faculty of Economic Sciences and Public Administration, Law specialization from Suceava, Romania Master in Administration and Formation of Human Resources in Organizations at ”Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania, [email protected] ABSTRACT: In this material we will highlight the distinct adoption elements of the world's states, such as the US, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, France. In order to really know the evolution of our adoption system, it is necessary to compare us with other states to see the differences and similarities between them. The favor for adoption is the favor for the child and for the adopter. The importance for adoption is the importance for the children and for adopter. Therefore, the best interest of the child must be the most important thing in the institution of adoption. The national laws of the world's states have different mechanisms for implementing the adoption procedure. These differences are given by family traditions, culture, habits, religious concepts, social and political context, and last but not least their history. There are states that do not admit adoption with a adopter of race, religion different from that of the child. With the development of the adoption system, borders have been opened, adopting between races, international adoptions or same-sex adoptions. KEYWORDS: adoption, adopted child, adopter, child's best interest, adoption procedure Introduction Adoption in Europe has a recent history, while it was introduced in the USA in the middle of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability – an Affliction of the Powerless
    Vulnerability – an affliction of the powerless A Nyoongar Story 1 Gerrard Shaw Bachelor of Theology; Master of English and Comparative Literature This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2012 2 Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work, which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. __________________________ Gerrard Shaw ABSTRACT This thesis analyses and investigates the issue of vulnerability among Australian Aboriginal people, as exemplified through the Nyoongar Shaw family and in particular myself. The Shaw family is from southwest Western Australia, more specifically the area belonging to the Yued nation. This thesis examines events in the lives of ancestors and descendants of the Nyoongar Shaw family. It specifically reconstructs the personal stories of our Aboriginal great-grandmother, Mary Ann Chuberan, our Aboriginal great-grandfather (in law), Frederick John Blurton, our Aboriginal grandfather George Shaw, Charles Fitzgerald (our Aboriginal grandfather in law), our Aboriginal aunties, Lilly, Jane and Margaret Shaw, and our Aboriginal mother, Ruby Shaw. By examining these lives, this thesis offers a way of understanding past Indigenous and non-Indigenous relationships in a West Australian context. It does this by drawing on government records, personal interviews, and the telling 3 of my story as a member of the ‘Stolen Generations’. Using the post-modern concept of auto- ethnography as a literary tool, it combines the genres of biography and autobiography. Through the telling of my story, I explicate my experience of being raised to be vulnerable, manifesting itself through inadequate emotional care in childhood, thereby setting me up for failure in dealing appropriately with relationships in adult life.
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Home Care in France and Switzerland
    Psychosocial Intervention 22 (2013) 215-225 2013 Vol. 22, No. 3, December 2013 ISSN: 1132-0559 December , 3 . COORDINADORA ESTATAL DE INTERVENCIÓN SOCIAL No , 22 . Vol Psychosocial Intervention Psychosocial Intervention Intervención Psicosocial INTERVENTION www.elsevier.es/psi PSYCHOSOCIAL www.elsevier.es/psi Out of home care in France and Switzerland Thomas Gabriela, Samuel Kellera, Flora Bolterb, Marie-Paule Martin-Blachaisb, and Gilles Séraphinb aResearch and Development Unit, Department of Social Work, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland bObservatoire National de l’Enfance en Danger (ONED), Paris, France ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Manuscript received: 05/05/2013 This article focuses on the structural similarities and dissimilarities that exist between child protection Accepted: 15/10/2013 systems in France and Switzerland, as exemplified by the evolutions of the last decade. The absence of an integrated holistic system and the great diversity of practices between territories in both countries creates Keywords: a reality that is a challenge for research and practitioners alike. Furthermore, legislation in France and Childcare Switzerland is quite similar in that there is no single defined support or welfare body of legislation for Out of home care children and youth. In both countries, the need for a better understanding of this reality drives the Child protection services development of better data collection processes and of new in-depth research on these issues. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child © 2013 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. Production by Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved. (UNCRC) Research challenges Las medidas de protección a la infancia con separación familiar en Francia y Suiza RESUMEN Palabras clave: Protección a la infancia Este artículo se centra en las semejanzas y diferencias entre los sistemas de protección a la infancia de Medidas de separación familiar Francia y Suiza, de acuerdo con la evolución del último decenio.
    [Show full text]