DOCSLIB.ORG

Government Response to the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information Privacy and Ethics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Government Response to the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information Privacy and Ethics Government Response to the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information Privacy and Ethics Statutory Review of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) Monsieur Tom Wappel, député Minister of Industry of Minister Président Jim Prentice Jim Comité permanent de l’accès à l’information, de la protection des renseignements personnels et de l’éthique Chambre des communes Édifice de l’Est, bureau 115 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 Monsieur, Sincerely, Conformément à l’article 109 du Règlement de la Chambre des communes, je suis heureux de répondre au nom du gouvernement du Canada aux recommandations du Comité permanent de l’accès à l’information, world-class model for the protection of personal information in the private sector. sector. private the in information personal of protection the for model world-class de la protection des renseignements personnels et de l’éthique de la Chambre des communes dans son rapport legislative improvements that will ensure that PIPEDA continues to merit its long-standing reputation as a as reputation long-standing its merit to continues PIPEDA that ensure will that improvements legislative sur l’examen, prévu par la loi, de la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels et les documents I look forward to consulting further on a number of issues raised during the Review, including the proposed the including Review, the during raised issues of number a on further consulting to forward look I électroniques (LPRPDE), déposé devant la Chambre le 2 mai 2007. awareness of privacy protection among both individuals and businesses. businesses. and individuals both among protection privacy of awareness Le gouvernement du Canada exprime sa gratitude aux membres du Comité pour leur examen détaillé de la improved. Of equal importance however, the Committee has highlighted the need for greater education and education greater for need the highlighted has Committee the however, importance equal Of improved. LPRPDE. Les recommandations judicieuses du Comité offrent un encadrement précieux aux efforts continus change at this time. The Committee report usefully points to a few specific areas where the Act can be can Act the where areas specific few a to points usefully report Committee The time. this at change déployés par le gouvernement afin de s’assurer que les renseignements personnels sont protégés de manière Overall, the government shares the Committee’s observation that PIPEDA is not in need of significant of need in not is PIPEDA that observation Committee’s the shares government the Overall, fidèle aux valeurs des Canadiens et aux besoins des entreprises à l’ère de l’information. throughout its first five years of existence, and how its effectiveness can be improved going forward. forward. going improved be can effectiveness its how and existence, of years five first its throughout Le gouvernement tient aussi à faire part de sa reconnaissance aux nombreux intervenants, notamment le The views expressed throughout the review offer valuable insight as to how PIPEDA has functioned functioned has PIPEDA how to as insight valuable offer review the throughout expressed views The commissaire à la protection de la vie privée du Canada, les organismes d’application de la loi, les groupes and individual businesses who appeared as witnesses and provided written submissions to the Committee. Committee. the to submissions written provided and witnesses as appeared who businesses individual and d’aide aux victimes, les associations industrielles et les entreprises qui ont témoigné et présenté des mémoires Commissioner of Canada, privacy advocates, law enforcement and victim groups, industry associations associations industry groups, victim and enforcement law advocates, privacy Canada, of Commissioner par écrit au Comité. Les opinions exprimées dans l’examen offrent une perspective éclairée sur le mode de The government would also like to express its appreciation to the many stakeholders, including the Privacy the including stakeholders, many the to appreciation its express to like also would government The fonctionnement de la LPRPDE au cours des cinq premières années de son entrée en vigueur et sur la façon dont on peut améliorer son efficacité à l’avenir. individual Canadians, as well as the needs of business in the information age. age. information the in business of needs the as well as Canadians, individual ment continues to ensure that personal information is protected in a manner that reflects both the values of values the both reflects that manner a in protected is information personal that ensure to continues ment Dans l’ensemble, le gouvernement abonde dans le sens du Comité pour dire que la LPRPDE ne nécessite review of PIPEDA. The Committee’s thoughtful recommendations provide valuable guidance as the govern- the as guidance valuable provide recommendations thoughtful Committee’s The PIPEDA. of review aucune modification importante pour l’instant. Le rapport du Comité met en évidence, de façon pratique, The Government of Canada extends its gratitude to the members of the Committee for their comprehensive their for Committee the of members the to gratitude its extends Canada of Government The quelques aspects particuliers où la Loi pourrait être améliorée. Autre élément tout aussi important, le Comité a souligné la nécessité d’éduquer et de sensibiliser davantage les personnes et les entreprises à propos de la (PIPEDA), tabled in the House on May 2, 2007. 2007. 2, May on House the in tabled (PIPEDA), Protection and Electronic Documents Act Documents Electronic and Protection protection des renseignements personnels. Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in its report on the Statutory Review of the the of Review Statutory the on report its in Ethics and Privacy Information, to Access Personal Information Personal Government of Canada to the recommendations made by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Committee Standing Commons of House the by made recommendations the to Canada of Government J’attends avec impatience de procéder à d’autres consultations sur plusieurs questions soulevées durant Standing Order 109 of the House of Commons of House the of 109 Order Standing to Pursuant , I am pleased to respond on behalf of the of behalf on respond to pleased am I , l’examen, entre autres les améliorations législatives proposées qui veilleront à ce que la LPRPDE préserve la réputation qu’elle s’est taillée depuis longue date, soit celle d’un modèle de calibre mondial pour la protection Dear Mr. Wappel: Mr. Dear des renseignements personnels dans le secteur privé. Je vous prie d’agréer, Monsieur, l’expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs. Le ministre de l’Industrie, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 K1A Ontario Ottawa, East Block, Room 115 Room Block, East House of Commons of House Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics and Privacy Information, to Access on Committee Standing Chair Mr. Tom Wappel, M.P. Wappel, Tom Mr. Jim Prentice 1 Government Response to the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information Privacy and Ethics and Privacy Information to Access on Committee Standing the of Report Fourth the to Response Government governments. Consequently, more than ever than more Consequently, governments. Réponse du gouvernement au ce qui pose de nouveaux défis tant pour l’industrie creating new challenges for both industry and and industry both for challenges new creating privacy regulation and oversight. and regulation privacy Quatrième Rapport du Comité que pour les gouvernements. En conséquence, les and process large quantities of personal information, personal of quantities large process and • maintain a flexible, “light-handed” approach to to approach “light-handed” flexible, a • maintain permanent de l’accès à consommateurs et les entreprises peuvent, plus que greatly enlarged the capacity to collect, transfer, transfer, collect, to capacity the enlarged greatly businesses; and businesses; l’information, de la protection jamais, profiter des mesures de protection claires et $49.9 billion. These developments have thus thus have developments These billion. $49.9 Canadians and organizations, especially small small especially organizations, and Canadians des renseignements personnels efficaces destinées à assurer la confidentialité des value of online commerce in Canada in 2006 was 2006 in Canada in commerce online of value protection measures among individual individual among measures protection données personnelles, surtout en ce qui concerne online. According to Statistics Canada, the total the Canada, Statistics to According online. • increase education and awareness of privacy privacy of awareness and education • increase et de l’éthique les affaires en ligne et le commerce électronique. more than 82% of Canadian businesses are now are businesses Canadian of 82% than more key definitions and provisions in the Act; the in provisions and definitions key n mai 2007, le Comité permanent de As of 2005, 68% of Canadians use the Internet, and Internet, the use Canadians of 68% 2005, of As • improve clarity and certainty with respect to to respect with certainty and clarity • improve Le Canada a réussi à relever ces défis. Sur la scène l’accès à l’information, de la protection des emergence of the Internet and online commerce. commerce. online and Internet the of emergence internationale, le régime canadien de protection des renseignements personnels et de l’éthique has dramatically increased in recent years with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CUPP Newsletter Spring 1998
    NEWSLETTER PROGRAME PARLEMENTARE CANADA-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY PROGRAM ISSUE 1, MAY 1998 very year, since 1991, the Can- E ^ada Ukraine Parliamentary Pro• gram has continued to grow in number of partici• pants and in the scope of its activities with the co• Ulyana Bardyn operation of MP's in the House of Commons and University of the MPP's in the Ontario Legislature. The parlia• Lviv - Law mentarians have helped Ukrainian university stu• Hobby: dents leam about the basics of a parliamentary parachute jumping democracy. This year, 34 students fiom 16 universi• ties in Ukraine have come to Canada to participate in the 8th program. This represents the largest number of participants in the 8 years of the pro• gram. 1 was somewhat surprised that it only took us several days to become accustomed to Canada and to make fiiends with fellow students from all comers of Ukraine. Coming to Canada, Vadym Bobrov each of us had his or her expectations as to the Interregional experience each would get from CUPP. The unify• Academy of Human ing purpose for all of us was the opportunity to Resources in leam more about the basis on which a democratic Kyiv - Law society and state has to be built. In addition to this Hobby: computers goal, each student has additional specific interests depending on their field of studies, such as the Ca• nadian Health Care System, judicial practice in Carrada and so forth. The discussions and commu• nications among the 34 CUPP interns also pro• vided us with a source for new ideas and perspec• tives about developments in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Reasons to Support Tom Wappel's Bill C-283 on September 18
    Centre for Science in the Public Interest’s 10 Reasons to Support Tom Wappel’s Bill C-283 on September 18, 2006 Summary of Bill C-283, An Act to Amend the Food and Drugs Act (food labelling): • Restaurant menus: Requires large chain-restaurants to post the number of calories in standard menu items beside the corresponding price on fast food restaurant menu boards and, at table service restaurants (where more spacious menus are used), also the amount of sodium, and the sum of saturated plus trans fat per serving. Single restaurants, small chains and non-standard menu items are exempt. • Fresh meat labels: Requires that all labels of fresh meat, poultry and seafood (i.e., not just processed meats) sold in large retail stores disclose nutrition facts required for most other foods by regulations promulgated in December 2002. • Ingredient labelling on packages of manufactured foods: Requires that pre-packaged, multi-ingredient foods show the percentage-by-weight of key ingredients (especially ones relevant to health, e.g., added sugars, fruits, vegetables, beans, whole grains). 1. It ensures practical health information is available to consumers. Bill C-283 will ensure that life-saving information is on food labels and menus where Canadians can effectively use it to choose more healthful foods. 2. These label/menu reforms have impressive support from civil society and experts. The measures advocated in Bill C-283 are supported by more than two dozen health and citizens groups collectively representing more than 2 million Canadians.1 One or more of the three measures proposed in Bill C-283 is echoed in seven Canadian and US expert reports.2 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, September 28, 1995
    CANADA VOLUME 133 S NUMBER 233 S 1st SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, September 28, 1995 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates and the Proceedings of Committee evidence are accessible on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 14957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, September 28, 1995 The House met at 10 a.m. general has reported that the gun control law has been a successful and cost effective measure which has increased _______________ public safety and reduced violent crime involving the use of firearms. Prayers The auditor general’s report would have to be considered by a _______________ 12–member committee comprised of six MPs and six experts on firearms law. The committee report would also have to be presented to and concurred in by the House of Commons or a ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS sunset provision would take effect immediately. [English] To argue against this type of sunset provision people would have to argue that they support gun control even if it does not GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS work and no matter how much the gun control costs. Mr. Peter Milliken (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of No one is arguing that gun control is unnecessary, only that the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speak- the police time and resources should be spent on measures that er, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, get the best bang for the buck.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-05-12 Pre-Election Spending
    Federal Announcements Since April 1, 2004 Date Department Program Amount Time Span Location Recipeint MP Present Tally All Government 6,830,827,550 Per Day 151,796,168 1-Apr-04 Industry TPC 7,200,000 Burnaby, BC Xantrex Technologies Hon. David Anderson 1-Apr-04 Industry TPC 9,500,000 Richmond, BC Sierra Wireless Hon. David Anderson 2-Apr-04 Industry TPC 9,360,000 London, ON Trojona Technologies Pat O'Brien 5-Apr-04 Industry Canada Research Chairs 121,600,000 Calgary, AB Hon. Lucienne Robillard 7-Apr-04 Industry TPC 3,900,000 Drumondville, PQ VisuAide Hon. Lucienne Robillard 7-Apr-04 Industry TPC 5,600,000 Montreal, PQ Fermag Hon. Lucienne Robillard 13-Apr-04 Industry 75,000,000 Quebec, PQ Genome Canada Hon. Lucienne Robillard 26-Apr-04 Industry TPC 3,760,000 Vancouver, BC Offshore Systems Hon. David Anderson 28-Apr-04 Industry TPC 8,700,000 Vancouver, BC Honeywell ASCa Hon. David Anderson 3-May-04 Industry TPC 7,700,000 Ottawa, ON MetroPhotonics Eugene Bellemare 4-May-04 Industry TPC 7,500,000 Port Coquitlam, BC OMNEX Control; Systems Hon. David Anderson 6-May-04 Industry TPC 4,600,000 Kanata, ON Cloakware Corporation Hon. David Pratt 7-May-04 Industry TPC 4,000,000 Waterloo, ON Raytheon Canada Limited Hon. Andrew Telegdi 7-May-04 Industry TPC 6,000,000 Ottawa, ON Edgeware Computer Systems Hon. David Pratt 13-May-04 Industry Bill C-9 170,000,000 Ottawa, ON Hon. Pierre Pettigrew 14-May-04 Industry TPC 4,000,000 Brossard, PQ Adacel Ltd Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, April 24, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 032 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, April 24, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, April 24, 1996 The House met at 2 p.m. [English] _______________ LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA Prayers Mr. Ken Epp (Elk Island, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, voters need accurate information to make wise decisions at election time. With _______________ one vote they are asked to choose their member of Parliament, select the government for the term, indirectly choose the Prime The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesdays, we will now Minister and give their approval to a complete all or nothing list of sing O Canada, which will be led by the hon. member for agenda items. Vancouver East. During an election campaign it is not acceptable to say that the [Editor’s Note: Whereupon members sang the national anthem.] GST will be axed with pledges to resign if it is not, to write in small print that it will be harmonized, but to keep it and hide it once the _____________________________________________ election has been won. It is not acceptable to promise more free votes if all this means is that the status quo of free votes on private members’ bills will be maintained. It is not acceptable to say that STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS MPs will be given more authority to represent their constituents if it means nothing and that MPs will still be whipped into submis- [English] sion by threats and actions of expulsion.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, May 8, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 042 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, May 8, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) OFFICIAL REPORT At page 2437 of Hansard Tuesday, May 7, 1996, under the heading ``Report of Auditor General'', the last paragraph should have started with Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of National Revenue, Lib.): The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2471 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, May 8, 1996 The House met at 2 p.m. [Translation] _______________ COAST GUARD Prayers Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ): Mr. Speaker, another _______________ voice has been added to the general vehement objections to the Coast Guard fees the government is preparing to ram through. The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger): As is our practice on Wednesdays, we will now sing O Canada, which will be led by the The Quebec urban community, which is directly affected, on hon. member for for Victoria—Haliburton. April 23 unanimously adopted a resolution demanding that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans reverse its decision and carry [Editor’s Note: Whereupon members sang the national anthem.] out an in depth assessment of the economic impact of the various _____________________________________________ options. I am asking the government to halt this direct assault against the STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Quebec economy. I am asking the government to listen to the taxpayers, the municipal authorities and the economic stakehold- [English] ers. Perhaps an equitable solution can then be found.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Canadian and Global
    Carleton University The Review of Bill C-91: Pharmaceutical Policy Development under a Majority Liberal Government A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Institute of Political Economy by Jason Wenczler, M.Sc. Ottawa, Canada September 2009 ©2009, Jason Wenczler Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-60270-6 Our file Notre r6f§rence ISBN: 978-0-494-60270-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduce, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Blueprint
    Privacy Protection Beyond the Blueprint Paul-André Comeau École nationale d’administration publique Québec 2009 Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada www.cai.gouv.qc.ca www.gnb.ca www.priv.gc.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM JENNIFER STODDART, COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA ................................................................................................. 1 MESSAGE FROM JACQUES SAINT-LAURENT, PRESIDENT OF THE COMMISSION D’ACCÈS À L’INFORMATION DU QUÉBEC ................................................................................................. 3 MESSAGE FROM BERNARD RICHARD, OMBUDSMAN,OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN OF NEW BRUNSWICK ...................................................................................................................... 5 THREE ISSUES, THREE SOLUTIONS .......................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 9 1. CIRCUMSTANCES AND PROPOSALS .......................................................................... 11 1.1 The Public Sector ..........................................................................11 1.2 The Private Sector .........................................................................12 2. LAWS AND THEIR INTENT........................................................................................ 17 2.1 The Public Sector ..........................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Homophobic Hate Propaganda in Canada
    \\server05\productn\G\GHS\5-1\GHS107.txt unknown Seq: 1 17-MAY-07 8:17 Homophobic Hate Propaganda in Canada Dr. Ellen Faulkner [email protected] I. INTRODUCTION While the typical hate crime is perceived to be of a violent nature perpetrated by individuals connected to Nazi and neo-Nazi groups and white supremacists, a more insidious form of hatred exists in the form of hate propaganda (Kinsella 1994; Martin 1995; Sher 1983; Sunahara 1981; Abella and Trooper 1982; Barrett 1987; Betcherman 1975; Bolaria and Li 1985; Frideres 1976). In Canada “hate messages take a variety of forms including flaming crosses, heckling at memorial services, music, and dese- cration of synagogues, mosques, or temples” (Commission for Racial Equality 1999, quoted in Kazarian 1998, 204). “In the winter of 1992, a lone protestor at an Ontario university disrupted a Kristallnacht (night of broken glass) ceremony in memory of the 1938 attack by Nazi soldiers on Jewish homes and businesses” (Gillis 1993, quoted in Kazarian 1998, 204). And “on a May 1993 weekend in London, Ontario, 40 members of the Ku Klux Klan—men, women, and children wearing white robes and conical hats—attended a cross-burning ceremony to celebrate the white race on a private property” (Swainson and Small 1993, quoted in Kazarian 1998, 204). In 1994, a skinhead in Toronto was sentenced to four years in prison for beating a Tamil immigrant into paralysis. Just before the attack, the man had attended a racist rock concert where he was inspired by such lyrics as “These boots are made for stompin’.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2005 Canadian Same-Sex Marriage Debate: a Case Study Examining How the Press Presented the Parliamentary Debate on Bill C-38
    The 2005 Canadian Same-Sex Marriage Debate: A Case Study Examining How the Press Presented the Parliamentary Debate on Bill C-38 by Rhonda Dene Walker-Sisttie A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Communication Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2012, Rhonda Dene Walker-Sisttie Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-94235-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-94235-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • (PIPEDA) Fourth Report of the Standing Comm
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA STATUTORY REVIEW OF THE PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS ACT (PIPEDA) Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Tom Wappel, MP Chairman May 2007 39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 STATUTORY REVIEW OF THE PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS ACT (PIPEDA) Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Tom Wappel, MP Chairman May 2007 39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY AND ETHICS CHAIRMAN Tom Wappel VICE-CHAIRMEN Pat Martin David Tilson MEMBERS Sukh Dhaliwal Carole Lavallée Glen Pearson Jim Peterson Scott Reid Bruce Stanton Dave Van Kesteren Robert Vincent Mike Wallace CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Richard Rumas LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Kristen Douglas Nancy Holmes iii THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY AND ETHICS has the honour to present its FOURTH REPORT Pursuant to its mandate under Standing Order 108(2), the Committee has studied a Statutory Review of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) and agreed to the following report: v TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]