DOCSLIB.ORG

Lagenophora Montana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lagenophora Montana Lagenophora montana COMMON NAME Papataniwha SYNONYMS Lagenifera montana Hook.f., Lagenifera stipitata var. montana (Hook.f.) Cabrera FAMILY Asteraceae AUTHORITY Lagenophora montana Hook.f. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON No ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Herbs - Dicotyledonous composites NVS CODE LAGMON Kuratau. Jan 2009. Photographer: Jeremy Rolfe CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 18 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2018 | Threatened – Nationally Critical PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2012 | Threatened – Nationally Endangered | Qualifiers: DP, SO, Sp 2009 | Threatened – Nationally Endangered | Qualifiers: DP, SO, Sp 2004 | Data Deficient DISTRIBUTION Indigenous. New Zealand: North Island (South Auckland, Hawkes Bay and Wellington), South Island (Nelson, Marlborough, Canterbury, Otago and Southland). Also in Australia (New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania) HABITAT Subalpine to alpine seeps, cushion bogs, swamps, lake and tarn margins, wet tussock grassland and stream banks, or on damp, shaded rock shelves amongst mosses. Mostly at 600-900m altitude, occasionally lower. Kuratau. Jan 2009. Photographer: Jeremy Rolfe FEATURES Extensively creeping herb of wet places (often threaded through sphagnum moss). Roots fibrous, produced at intervals from slender spreading rhizomes (these 0.5-0.9 mm diameter when fresh). Leaves in loose rosettes, sometimes grading along lower stem into bracts; lamina membranous, bright lettuce green to bronze-green, often purpled or blotched with red, up to 50-80 × 15-18 mm, obtuse to broadly acute, glabrescent to glabrous, almost entire to shallowly dentate with up to 4 pairs of teeth; apex scarcely apiculate. Scape up to 300 mm long, glabrous to glabrate, usually dark purple, often bearing a few small narrowly deltoid to lanceolate bracts up to 10 mm long; hairs if present mostly restricted to below capitulum sometimes elsewhere on scape; appressed, antrorse near capitulum, spreading elsewhere; capitulum 3-7 mm diameter; Involucral bracts to 3 mm long, mostly narrowly oblong, obtuse to subacute. Ligules to 3 mm long, white, mauve or purpled; disc florets yellow. Cypsela 2.0-3.5 × 0.8-1.0 mm, oblanceolate, brown or purple-brown with paler margins; beak up to 0.5 mm long. SIMILAR TAXA Lagenifera barkeri and L. cuneata are similar from these L. montana can be distinguished by its very long, slender and wiry scapes with minute, white, pinkish or purple flowers and membranous, glabrate or glabrous usually bright green leaves. Lagenifera barkerii has obvious leaf hairs, consistently white flowers, and slightly pointed leaves while L. cuneata has white flowers, hairy leaves and grows in drier habitats. FLOWERING October - April FLOWER COLOURS Yellow FRUITING December - June PROPAGATION TECHNIQUE Easily grown by division of whole plants. Fresh seed if available should germinate easily. THREATS Herbarium specimens indicate that Lagenophora montana is probably rather uncommon. The species is easily overlooked, known from very few post 1980 collections, and the majority of those have been made from sites that are now choked with or threatened by weeds. ETYMOLOGY lagenophora: From the Latin lagen ‘bottle or flask’ and –phora a Greek suffix denoting a carrier, possibly referring to the urceolate (urn-shaped) cypsela. montana: From the Latin mons ‘mountain’, meaning growing on mountains TAXONOMIC NOTES The correct spelling of the genus has been the matter of some debate. Drury (1974) argued that the naming author of the genus Cassini had first spelled the genus as Lagenifera in 1816, and that this spelling therefore took priority over his later Lagenophora (proposed in 1818). Nevertheless Nicolson (1996) put forward a proposal to reject the earlier Lagenifera in favour of Lagenophora, and this proposal was accepted under the Vienna Code (see Art. 14.11 & App. III 2006). Nevertheless this ruling was accidentally overlooked by New Zealand botanists until it was drawn to their attention in 2013 (P. J. de Lange pers. comm. August 2013). ATTRIBUTION Fact sheet prepared for NZPCN by P.J. de Lange (29 March 2010). Description based on fresh material and herbarium specimens held at AK and description from the Flora of Victoria (Entwistle & Walsh 2000). REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING Drury, D.G. 1974: A Broadly Based Taxonomy of Lagenifera Section Lagenifera and Solenogyne (Compositae- Astereae), with an Account of their Species in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 12: 365-395 Entwistle, T.J.; Walsh, N.G. 2000: Flora of Victoria Vol. 4 Dicotyledons (Olacaceae To Asteraceae). Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford. Nicolson, D.H. 1996: (1233) Proposal to conserve the name Lagenophora (Compositae) with a conserved spelling. Taxon 45: 341-342 CITATION Please cite as: de Lange, P.J. (Year at time of access): Lagenophora montana Fact Sheet (content continuously updated). New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. https://www.nzpcn.org.nz/flora/species/lagenophora-montana/ (Date website was queried) MORE INFORMATION https://www.nzpcn.org.nz/flora/species/lagenophora-montana/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Identity and Typification of Ixauchenus Sublyratus Cass
    The identity and typifi cation of Ixauchenus sublyratus Cass. (Asteraceae) Anthony R. BEAN Jian WANG Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane Botanic Gardens, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong 4066, Queensland (Australia) [email protected] Published on 29 December 2017 Bean A. R. & Wang J. 2017. — The identity and typifi cation of Ixauchenus sublyratus Cass. (Asteraceae). Adansonia, sér. 3, 39 (2): 167-170. https://doi.org/10.5252/a2017n2a7 KEY WORDS ABSTRACT Asteraceae, Australia, A lectotype and epitype are here selected for Ixauchenus sublyratus Cass. We have determined that lectotypification. this name is applicable to a taxon of the Lagenophora gracilis species complex. RÉSUMÉ MOTS CLÉS Identité et typifi cation d’Ixauchenus sublyratus Cass. (Asteraceae). Asteraceae, Australie, Un lectotype et un épitype sont désignés ici pour Ixauchenus sublyratus Cass. Nous avons également lectotypification. déterminé que ce nom s’appliquait aussi à un taxon du groupe d’espèces associées à Lagenophora gracilis. ADANSONIA, sér. 3 • 2017 • 39 (2) © Publications scientifi ques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.adansonia.com 167 Bean A. R. & Wang J. INTRODUCTION on the label is a reference to the second smaller specimen pre- sent on the sheet, i.e. the sheet had a specimen of ‘Lagenophora Th e destruction in March 2017 of over 100 Lagenophora Cass. bellidifolia’ and also a specimen of Ixauchenus. Th is notation herbarium specimens belonging to the Muséum national reveals that at least one previous worker considered this specimen d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, has made necessary this note, as to be an authentic specimen of Ixauchenus. No other original it is vital to fi x the application of names aff ected by this un- material for I.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomen Novum), Preferred a Spelling, It Is a Case Touching the What Ticklish Question of Defining More Exactly Is a Different Name in the Nomenclatural
    The genus Lagenophora (Compositae) Angel+L. Cabrera Museo de la Plata, Argentina The under the genus Lagenophora was first described by Cassini name Lagenifera (in Bull. Soc. Philomat. 12, 1816, 199) withthe following diagnosis: la tribus le calendula ‘Ce genre, de des astérées, comprend magellanicá, Willd. et le bellis la stipitata, Labill. Son principal caractère reside dans cypsèle lagéniforme, com- au en col primée, prolongée sommet un qui ne porte point d’aigrette. Les fleurons sont mâles’. Two in the he the years later, same periodical (1818, p. 34) changed name Lagenifera without comment into Lagenophora, the latter being simply the latinized Greek equivalent of authors have the Lagenifera. Later unanimously accepted name Lagenophora, although Davis pointed out that Lagenifera has priority. Only recently Backer & Bakhuizen van Brink have the den Jr (Flora of Java 2, 1965, 381) accepted name Lagenifera, pointing that this the that be out is legitimate generic name, adding Lagenophora is to treated as an etymological variant. This would imply that under Lagenifera no new combinations are necessary. it is Cassini in Though perfectly true that 1818 not intended to give a new name but latinized Greek border (nomen novum), preferred a spelling, it is a case touching the what ticklish question of defining more exactly is a different name in the nomenclatural sense. and To settle this, to preserve customary usage, Bullock has recently proposed (Taxon the and is here 15, 1966, 75 —76) to conserve the name, at least spelling Lagenophora this adhered to. Davis in As to typification 1950 proposed as the type species Bellis stipitata Labill.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and Related
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and related genera based on the nuclear ribosomal (nr) DNA sequence data (Asteraceae: Astereae) Vesna Karaman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Karaman, Vesna, "Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and related genera based on the nuclear ribosomal (nr) DNA sequence data (Asteraceae: Astereae)" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2200. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2200 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PHYLOGENY OF HINTERHUBERA, NOVENIA AND RELATED GENERA BASED ON THE NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL (nr) DNA SEQUENCE DATA (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Vesna Karaman B.S., University of Kiril and Metodij, 1992 M.S., University of Belgrade, 1997 May 2006 "Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children." Ancient Indian Proverb ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to many people who have contributed to the work of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Solenogyne Christensenii, Comb. Nov. (Asteraceae: Astereae), a New Combination for a New Zealand Species
    Систематика, флористика, географія рослин Plant Taxonomy, Geography and Floristics https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj77.02.073 Solenogyne christensenii, comb. nov. (Asteraceae: Astereae), a new combination for a New Zealand species Peter J. de LANGE1, Jian WANG2, John W. BARKLA3, Andrew MARSHALL1 1 Unitec Institute of Technology, School of Environmental & Animal Sciences Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand [email protected] 2 Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Queensland 4066, Australia [email protected] 3 26 Larkins Street, Dunedin 9010, New Zealand [email protected] de Lange P.J., Wang J., Barkla J.W., Marshall A. 2020. Solenogyne christensenii, comb. nov. (Asteraceae: Astereae), a new combination for a New Zealand species. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 77(2): 73–80. Abstract. The new combination Solenogyne christensenii (Petrie) de Lange, Jian Wang ter & Barkla comb. nov. is validated for a New Zealand species originally published as Abrotanella christensenii Petrie. The species is described, illustrated and differentiated from similar and related taxa. The species is seriously threatened, being known with certainty only from the South Island of New Zealand where there is one extant population in Otago, though the species was also known historically from the type locality, Hanmer Plain, North Canterbury. Keywords: Abrotanella, Asteraceae, Astereae, flora, new combination, New Zealand, Solenogyne, Solenogyne christensenii, taxonomy Submitted 22 April 2020. Published 29 April 2020 де Ланге П.Дж., Ван Цзянь, Баркла Дж.В., Маршалл Е. 2020. Solenogyne christensenii, comb. nov. (Asteraceae: Astereae), нова комбінація для виду з Нової Зеландії.
    [Show full text]
  • Astereae, Asteraceae) Downloaded from by Guest on 04 September 2019 GISELA SANCHO1*, PETER J
    bs_bs_banner Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 177, 78–95. With 5 figures Late Cenozoic diversification of the austral genus Lagenophora (Astereae, Asteraceae) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article-abstract/177/1/78/2416348 by guest on 04 September 2019 GISELA SANCHO1*, PETER J. DE LANGE FLS2, MARIANO DONATO3, JOHN BARKLA4 and STEVE J. WAGSTAFF5 1División Plantas Vasculares, Museo de La Plata, FCNYM, UNLP, Paseo del Bosque s.n., La Plata, 1900, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Ecosystems and Species Unit, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68908, Newton 1145, Auckland, New Zealand 3ILPLA, Instituto de Limnología Dr. Raúl A. Ringuelet, FCNYM, UNLP and CONICET, 122 and 60, La Plata, 1900, Buenos Aires, Argentina 4Otago Conservancy, Department of Conservation, PO Box 5244, Dunedin 9058, New Zealand 5Allan Herbarium, Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand Received 14 March 2014; revised 23 May 2014; accepted for publication 30 August 2014 Lagenophora (Astereae, Asteraceae) has 14 species in New Zealand, Australia, Asia, southern South America, Gough Island and Tristan da Cunha. Phylogenetic relationships in Lagenophora were inferred using nuclear and plastid DNA regions. Reconstruction of spatio-temporal evolution was estimated using parsimony, Bayesian inference and likelihood methods, a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock and ancestral area and habitat reconstruc- tions. Our results support a narrow taxonomic concept of Lagenophora including only a core group of species with one clade diversifying in New Zealand and another in South America. The split between the New Zealand and South American Lagenophora dates from 11.2 Mya [6.1–17.4 95% highest posterior density (HPD)].
    [Show full text]
  • BFS293 Site Species List
    Species lists based on plot records from DEP (1996), Gibson et al. (1994), Griffin (1993), Keighery (1996) and Weston et al. (1992). Taxonomy and species attributes according to Keighery et al. (2006) as of 16th May 2005. Species Name Common Name Family Major Plant Group Significant Species Endemic Growth Form Code Growth Form Life Form Life Form - aquatics Common SSCP Wetland Species BFS No SVH01 (FCT26a) SVH02 (FCT27) Wd? Acacia alata var. tetrantha Winged Wattle Mimosaceae Dicot s WA 3 SH P 293 y y Acacia lasiocarpa Panjang Mimosaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 293 y y * Aira caryophyllea Silvery Hairgrass Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 293 y * Anagallis arvensis Pimpernel Primulaceae Dicot 4 H A 293 y Astroloma microcalyx Astroloma Epacridaceae Dicot P3/p,s WA 3 SH P 293 y Austrostipa flavescens Tall Speargrass Poaceae Monocot AUST 5 G P 293 y * Avellinia michelii Avellinia Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 293 y * Bartsia trixago Bartsia Scrophulariaceae Dicot 4 H A 293 y Bossiaea eriocarpa Common Bossiaea Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 293 y * Briza maxima Blowfly Grass Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 293 y Caladenia bicalliata subsp. bicalliata Limestone Spider Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 293 y Caladenia hirta subsp. hirta Sugar Candy Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 293 y Calothamnus quadrifidus Freeway Calothamnus Myrtaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 293 y Cassytha racemosa Dodder Laurel Lauraceae Dicot AUST 4 H (CL) P-PAR 293 y * Cerastium glomeratum Sticky Mouse-ear Chickweed Caryophyllaceae Dicot 4 H A 293 y Comesperma confertum Coastal Comesperma Polygalaceae Dicot WA 3 SH-H P 293 y Conostylis aculeata Prickly Conostylis Haemodoraceae Monocot WA 4 H P 293 y Cyrtostylis huegelii Midge Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 293 y Daucus glochidiatus Australian Carrot Apiaceae Dicot 4 H A 293 y Desmocladus flexuosus Desmocladus Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P 293 y y Diplopeltis huegelii subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Lagenophora Indigenous Plants for Ballarat Gardens
    Indigenous Plants for Ballarat Gardens Common Lagenophora Lagenophora stipitata FAST FACTS Also known as Blue Bottle-daisy , Common Planting : Though Blue Bottle-daisy might Groundcover Lagenophora (Lagenophora stipitata ) is an look delicate, it is actually quite tough and Family: Asteraceae Australian native plant from the Ballarat will grow well in your garden if planted in a Daisy area. It is a tiny plant no more than 15cm hole not much larger than the pot within a Size: 15cm H high that will spread well and form a great few days of purchase. Give it a good ½ Position: Partly shaded groundcover over bare earth or in amongst bucket of water as soon as you plant it and Soil: Moist mulch. it should be fine after that. Flowers: Spring / Summer Location : It likes a partly shaded position Care : It doesn’t need any pruning to keep Fruits: Inconspicuous in moist soil. it looking good, however Blue Bottle-daisy Care: Low maintenance may need a little extra watering over dry Leaves : Blue Bottle-daisy leaves form neat summer months to stay looking its best. little bunches (or rosettes) that look good all year round. Propagation : After a couple of years you can dig up a small clump to replant Flowers : In late spring and summer the somewhere else in your garden. plant is covered in small pale purple daisies about the size of a 5c piece. Alternatively, collect the sticky black seed from the old flower heads in summer, spread on moist potting mix and cover lightly. For further information contact Environmental and Conservation Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Federation University Australia..
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Falkland Islands Species List
    Falkland Islands Species List Day Common Name Scientific Name x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 BIRDS* 2 DUCKS, GEESE, & WATERFOWL Anseriformes - Anatidae 3 Black-necked Swan Cygnus melancoryphus 4 Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba 5 Upland Goose Chloephaga picta 6 Kelp Goose Chloephaga hybrida 7 Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga rubidiceps 8 Flying Steamer-Duck Tachyeres patachonicus 9 Falkland Steamer-Duck Tachyeres brachypterus 10 Crested Duck Lophonetta specularioides 11 Chiloe Wigeon Anas sibilatrix 12 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 13 Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera 14 Yellow-billed Pintail Anas georgica 15 Silver Teal Anas versicolor 16 Yellow-billed Teal Anas flavirostris 17 GREBES Podicipediformes - Podicipedidae 18 White-tufted Grebe Rollandia rolland 19 Silvery Grebe Podiceps occipitalis 20 PENGUINS Sphenisciformes - Spheniscidae 21 King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus 22 Gentoo Penguin Pygoscelis papua Cheesemans' Ecology Safaris Species List Updated: April 2017 Page 1 of 11 Day Common Name Scientific Name x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 23 Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus 24 Macaroni Penguin Eudyptes chrysolophus 25 Southern Rockhopper Penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome 26 ALBATROSSES Procellariiformes - Diomedeidae 27 Gray-headed Albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma 28 Black-browed Albatross Thalassarche melanophris 29 Royal Albatross (Southern) Diomedea epomophora epomophora 30 Royal Albatross (Northern) Diomedea epomophora sanfordi 31 Wandering Albatross (Snowy) Diomedea exulans exulans 32 Wandering
    [Show full text]
  • Parque Nacional Tierra Del Fuego Flora
    Parque Nacional Tierra del Fuego Flora • Common English Name (Nombre Español o Local)Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons (Monocotyledones) • Arrowgrass, Marsh (??) (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrowgrass, Seaside (??) (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Bentgrass, Common (Pasto Quila) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Agrostis capillaris) • Bentgrass, Upland (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Agrostis perennans) • Bluegrass (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa alopecurus) • Bluegrass (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa breviculmis) • Bluegrass (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa rigidifolia) • Bluegrass (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa scaberula) • Bluegrass (Möra-Shúka) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa yaganica) • Bluegrass, Annual (Pastito de Invierno) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Canada (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa compressa) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Pasto de Mallin) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa pratensis) • Bluegrass, Northern (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Poa stenantha) • Bulrush, California (Junco) (Cyperales Cyperaceae Schoenoplectus californicus) • Bulrush, Nevada (Scirpus) (Cyperales Cyperaceae Amphiscirpus nevadensis) • Foxtail, Meadow (Alopecuro de los Prados-cola de Zorro) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Alopecurus pratensis) • Grass, Black (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Alopecurus magellanicus) • Grass, Fiber Optic (??) (Cyperales Cyperaceae Isolepis cernua) • Grass, Small Tussock (??) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae Festuca magellanica) • Grass, Sweet Holy (Ratonera) (Poales Gramineae/Poaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation of the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru: With
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1988 Flora and vegetation of the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru: with preliminary taxonomic studies for a manual of the flora David Nelson Smith Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, David Nelson, "Flora and vegetation of the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru: with preliminary taxonomic studies for a manual of the flora " (1988). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8891. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8891 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • South Capel Flora and Vegetation Assessment Final Report
    SOUTH CAPEL FLORA AND VEGETATION ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Prepared for Iluka by Endemic Pty Ltd April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of the study ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 The study area......................................................................................................................... 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 2.1 Physical Environment .............................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Flora and vegetation of the area ............................................................................................. 3 2.3 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................... 11 3 METHODS AND LIMITATIONS .........................................................................................................13 3.1 Timing of the survey ............................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Flora survey ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]