DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download Marque and Reprisal Kindle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download Marque and Reprisal Kindle MARQUE AND REPRISAL PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Elizabeth Moon | 400 pages | 30 Aug 2005 | Random House USA Inc | 9780345447593 | English | New York, United States Marque and Reprisal PDF Book These also permitted a type of economic warfare short of deploying a navy and also increased defense spending. A shipowner would send in an application stating the name, description, tonnage, and force armaments of the vessel, the name and residence of the owner, and the intended number of crew, and tendered a bond promising strict observance of the country's laws and treaties and of international laws and customs. Complying with this complex rule can prove to be quite complicated, in large part because OFAC does not publish a list of majority SDN-owned entities; that legwork is left to compliance teams to determine. Privateering was frequently encouraged from the period between to , at which time weaker countries used privateers to hurt a stronger country in the way guerrilla warfare is currently used. The East India Company arranged for letters of marque for its East Indiamen such as the Lord Nelson , not so that they could carry cannons to fend off warships, privateers, and pirates on their voyages to India and China—that they could do without permission—but so that, should they have the opportunity to take a prize, they could do so without being guilty of piracy. Meanwhile, the prospects of French privateers had been ruined by the efficiency of frigates and convoy escorts. The terrorists were compared to pirates in that they are difficult to fight by traditional military means. France made great use of letters of marque and reprisal, seizing more than 2, U. Tripoli declared war on the U. It also led to trouble with neutral powers , even though a declaratory act was always passed at the beginning of a war that laid down the right to capture enemy vessels at sea and to have such captures adjudicated under prize law. Once captured, the privateers could then bring the case of that prize before their own admiralty court for condemnation and transfer of ownership to the privateer. In this context, a letter of marque was a lumbering, square-rigged cargo carrier that might pick up a prize if the opportunity arose in its normal course of duties. During the American Revolutionary War, Britain issued letters against colonial merchant ships to interrupt trade in arms and other needed provisions. This section needs expansion with: background on when major European nations and the US Asian, and others abolished privateering. The United States has not legally commissioned any privateers since , although the status of submarine-hunting Goodyear airships in the early days of World War II created significant confusion. Additionally, vessels with a letter of marque were exempt from having to sail in convoy, and nominally their crew members were exempt, during a voyage, from impressment. The procedure for issuing letters of marque and the issuing authority varied by time and circumstance. In December and the first months of , Goodyear commercial L class blimp Resolute operating out of Moffett Field in Sunnyvale , California, flew anti-submarine patrols. A prize court's formal condemnation was required to transfer title; otherwise the vessel's previous owners might well reclaim her on her next voyage, and seek damages for the confiscated cargo. The ban on privateering was binding only on the parties that signed the Declaration. Transporting goods across the Atlantic took many days and posed many risks to merchant vessels. Technically, privateers operated under a formal grant of authority such as a letter of marque and reprisal. Ralph M. The availability of Latin American markets which were not subject to the embargo to Britain and France provided significant resources so that British merchants could smuggle goods into Europe. James Madison, who later used the letters during as president, wrote about the restrictions on the powers of the states in Federalist Papers No. Several conventions on naval warfare in respect to merchant vessels at sea were adopted, but the one setting up an international prize court to hear appeals from belligerent prize courts was never ratified. Britain led the effort to ban privateering, having suffered the loss of many ships to foreign forces in various wars of the early 19 th Century. Early in his administration, he sought to reduce the size of the armed forces fearing that a large army and navy would invite dictatorship. Adams was able to avert a declaration of war by his diplomatic efforts to negotiate peace with France. Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article requires login. Accept Reject Read More. A letter of marque and reprisal in effect converted a private merchant vessel into a naval auxiliary. Though a business may be compliant with the high standards set by U. All trade and connections were severed, even the mail. The letter of marque and reprisal first arose in , [10] 50 years after wartime privateer licenses were first issued. Learn More in these related Britannica articles:. Retrieved August 9, Marque and Reprisal Writer In December and the first months of , Goodyear commercial L class blimp Resolute operating out of Moffett Field in Sunnyvale , California, flew anti-submarine patrols. A year later, Britain sent a squadron to attack Algiers. However, the bills Paul introduced were not enacted into law. Napoleon I retaliated by issuing the Berlin Decree in May , which imposed an embargo against British trade, prohibiting the import of British goods by European allies or dependent on France. In this context, a letter of marque was a lumbering, square-rigged cargo carrier that might pick up a prize if the opportunity arose in its normal course of duties. A letter of marque and reprisal French : lettre de marque; lettre de course was a government license in the Age of Sail that authorized a private person, known as a privateer or corsair , to attack and capture vessels of a nation at war with the issuer. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Also, the process allows prosecution of individuals who violate the terms and scope of the authority. Upton is considered the foremost 19th-century American scholar on prize law. The details of the ship, including tonnage, crew and weapons were recorded. Popular among Europeans from the late Middle Ages up to the 19th century, cruising for enemy prizes with a letter of marque was considered an honorable calling that combined patriotism and profit. A ship so used is termed a privateer. Britain led the effort to ban privateering, having suffered the loss of many ships to foreign forces in various wars of the early 19 th Century. Tripoli declared war on the U. Additionally, vessels with a letter of marque were exempt from having to sail in convoy, and nominally their crew members were exempt, during a voyage, from impressment. Local vice-admiralty courts were later set up, the earliest being at Jamaica in The rise of the professional American navy at the end of the 19th century and the American embrace of the sea power doctrines of Alfred Thayer Mahan finally led the U. Letters of marque and reprisal were a topic of debate in the time leading up to the Constitutional Convention in Britain blockaded French coasts to prevent shipping into France. This has exposed the insurance industry to Marque and Reprisal Reviews Learn More in these related Britannica articles:. Prizes were assessed and valued with profits split in pre agreed proportions between the government, the owners and the captain and crew. Transporting goods across the Atlantic took many days and posed many risks to merchant vessels. Enforcement of the embargo was weak and encouraged British merchants to seek new markets. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. A little-noticed provision of the United States Constitution established the foundation for the economic sanctions in force today. History at your fingertips. Afterwards, as they were on their way to China, the same three East Indiamen participated in an action in the Straits of Malacca. A merchant ship converted into a warship cannot have the rights and duties appertaining to vessels having that status unless it is placed under the direct authority, immediate control, and responsibility of the power the flag of which it flies. With the cessation of hostilities, U. Although the ship carried few people, the capture of its passengers and their threatened enslavement generated strong resentment in the U. Licensing privateers during wartime became widespread in Europe by the 16th Century, [14] when most countries [15] began to enact laws regulating the granting of letters of marque and reprisal. William C. Britain led the effort to ban privateering, having suffered the loss of many ships to foreign forces in various wars of the early 19 th Century. Various accounts refer to airships Resolute and Volunteer as operating under a "privateer status", but Congress never authorized a commission, nor did the President sign one. Much of the debate centers on whether the Marque and Reprisal Clause extends only to authorizing private parties — the privateers — to engage in reprisals for private gain, or whether it also gives Congress the power to authorize reprisals by United States armed forces for public purposes. They came upon a French frigate , with some six or seven British [ clarification needed ] prizes, replenishing her water casks ashore. Hidden categories: All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September CS1: Julian—Gregorian uncertainty Webarchive template wayback links Use mdy dates from April Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing French-language text Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March Articles to be expanded from March All articles to be expanded Articles using small message boxes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Tew and Pirate Settlements of the Indo - Atlantic Trade World, 1645 -1730 1 Kevin Mcdonald Department of History University of California, Santa Cruz
    ‘A Man of Courage and Activity’: Thomas Tew and Pirate Settlements of the Indo - Atlantic Trade World, 1645 -1730 1 Kevin McDonald Department of History University of California, Santa Cruz “The sea is everything it is said to be: it provides unity, transport , the means of exchange and intercourse, if man is prepared to make an effort and pay a price.” – Fernand Braudel In the summer of 1694, Thomas Tew, an infamous Anglo -American pirate, was observed riding comfortably in the open coach of New York’s only six -horse carriage with Benjamin Fletcher, the colonel -governor of the colony. 2 Throughout the far -flung English empire, especially during the seventeenth century, associations between colonial administrators and pirates were de rig ueur, and in this regard , New York was similar to many of her sister colonies. In the developing Atlantic world, pirates were often commissioned as privateers and functioned both as a first line of defense against seaborne attack from imperial foes and as essential economic contributors in the oft -depressed colonies. In the latter half of the seventeenth century, moreover, colonial pirates and privateers became important transcultural brokers in the Indian Ocean region, spanning the globe to form an Indo-Atlantic trade network be tween North America and Madagascar. More than mere “pirates,” as they have traditionally been designated, these were early modern transcultural frontiersmen: in the process of shifting their theater of operations from the Caribbean to the rich trading grounds of the Indian Ocean world, 1 An earlier version of this paper was presented at the “Counter -Currents and Mainstreams in World History” conference at UCLA on December 6-7, 2003, organized by Richard von Glahn for the World History Workshop, a University of California Multi -Campus Research Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Let Privateers Marque Terrorism: a Proposal for a Reawakening
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 82 Issue 1 Article 5 Winter 2007 Let Privateers Marque Terrorism: A Proposal for a Reawakening Robert P. DeWitte Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation DeWitte, Robert P. (2007) "Let Privateers Marque Terrorism: A Proposal for a Reawakening," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 82 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol82/iss1/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Let Privateers Marque Terrorism: A Proposal for a Reawakening ROBERT P. DEWrrE* INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, the United States has repeatedly emphasized the asymmetry between traditional war and the War on TerrorlI-an unorthodox conflict centered on a term which has been continuously reworked and reinvented into its current conception as the "new terrorism." In this rendition of terrorism, fantasy-based ideological agendas are severed from state sponsorship and supplemented with violence calculated to maximize casualties.' The administration of President George W. Bush reinforced and legitimized this characterization with sweeping demonstrations of policy revolution, comprehensive analysis of intelligence community failures,3 and the enactment of broad legislation tailored both to rectify intelligence failures and provide the national security and law enforcement apparatus with the tools necessary to effectively prosecute the "new" war.4 The United States also radically altered its traditional reactive stance on armed conflict by taking preemptive action against Iraq-an enemy it considered a gathering threat 5 due to both state support of terrorism and malignant belligerency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Full Story of United States V. Smith, Americaâ•Žs Most Important
    Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 1 Issue 2 November 2012 The Full Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case Joel H. Samuels Follow this and additional works at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social History Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Joel H. Samuels, The Full Story of United States v. Smith, America’s Most Important Piracy Case, 1 PENN. ST. J.L. & INT'L AFF. 320 (2012). Available at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol1/iss2/7 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2012 VOLUME 1 NO. 2 THE FULL STORY OF UNITED STATES V. SMITH, AMERICA’S MOST IMPORTANT PIRACY CASE Joel H. Samuels* INTRODUCTION Many readers would be surprised to learn that a little- explored nineteenth-century piracy case continues to spawn core arguments in modern-day civil cases for damages ranging from environmental degradation in Latin America to apartheid-era investment in South Africa, as well as criminal trials of foreign terrorists.1 That case, United States v. Smith,2 decided by the United * Associate Professor, Deputy Director, Rule of Law Collaborative, University of South Carolina School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Nathaniel Mayo: Documenting an American Merchant Seaman of the Early Nineteenth Century
    Nathaniel Mayo: Documenting an American Merchant Seaman of the Early Nineteenth Century Anne Morddel Abstract Early nineteenth century American merchant seamen roamed the Atlantic World and many are well documented in the libraries and archives of the countries warring around the Atlantic at the time, as well as in the archives and papers of the American consuls in those countries. This study is of one seaman, Nathaniel Mayo of Massachusetts. Town records and the Federal census give little more than his name and that he was a seaman. However, French archives reveal that he was a mate on a vessel evading the strictures of the Embargo Act, was captured and became a prisoner of war. Consular papers contain letters from him and his father. State Department correspondence and French archives both show that he was on the crew of the privateer, the True-Blooded Yankee, while British archives describe his imprisonment in England. Court and prize records in Massachusetts show that he returned home to make a claim for his prize money. Hundreds more American seamen appear in Atlantic World records and archives; studying them could shed quite a lot of light on their hitherto anonymous lives. _______________________________________________________ Documenting American merchant seamen of the first twenty or thirty years of the nineteenth century is quite difficult. Town registers of births, marriages and deaths may tell the three basic events of their lives but nothing more. Looking beyond registers, the Seaman’s Protection Certificates carried a description of the man but little more; crew lists of merchant vessels were rare and few were preserved; vessel registration gave the names of a ship's owner and master only.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Scotia and Privateering: Selections from the Colonial Office (CO 217) Great Britain
    Nova Scotia and Privateering: Selections from the Colonial Office (CO 217) Great Britain. Colonial Office. Original Correspondence: Nova Scotia and Cape Breton (CO 217): 1710-1867 (HIL-MICL FC LPR .G7C6N6C6) **Reference Sources: Calendars published in the annual Reports by Library and Archives Canada; thesis by John Faisbisy in his work, Privateering and Piracy: the effects of New England raiding upon Nova Scotia during the American Revolution, 1775-1783; and Calendar of State Papers online via British History Online. **Also includes at the bottom, some references from Prince Edward Island State Papers (CO 226) ***Interpreting references: ff = folio no. found stamped on the top of each of the right sided pages; No. = document no. found in handwriting at the top of the start of each document; letter and no. combination (eg. B 2) = found at the end of each document. UNB Correspondents Date & Notes Reference to Reel Location originals on film Number 11 Vane to Secretary December 16, Gives an account of La Fosse, taken in a privateer CO 217 Vol. 31, ff. 20 of State 1711, of his own and now ready to serve Her Majesty. Annapolis Royal 1 Comptrollers of June 22, 1717 Garrison of Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia, Harbour C.O. 217 Vol. 2, ff. 146, the Accounts of of Placentia, Chebucto [Halifax], Le Havre, Island of 163 & 165 the Army to the Sable [Sable Island], protecting the fishing trade, King privateers, forts, French - “a smaller for be built at Jennys Streight the entrance into the British River going up to Annapolis Royal and the Great Bason, where thousands of the greatest vessels may ride safely in the worst of weather and is now open to all privateers, but by this mean wou’d upon all occasions be a secure retreat to our trading ships upon the coast…” 11 Aldridge to December 24, Report has been received that St.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Privateering Plunder Efficient?*
    Was Privateering Plunder Efficient?* Peter T. Leeson† Alex Nowrasteh‡ Abstract This paper argues that when contracts between enemies are enforceable and transaction costs are low, plunderers and their victims benefit from trade that facilitates the former’s ability to plunder the latter. Coasean “plunder contracts” transform part of plunder’s social costs into private benefits for plunderers and their victims. A significant portion of the wealth that plunder would otherwise destroy is preserved instead. The result is more efficient plunder. To investigate our hypothesis we consider maritime marauding in the 18th and 19th centuries. Privateers developed a system of ransom and parole founded on Coasean plunder contracts with victim merchantmen. * We thank Pete Boettke, Tyler Cowen, Chris Coyne, the editor, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this paper and Judith-Jane Stark-Modlin for comments and assistance with accessing several hard-to-find sources. Leeson also thanks the Becker Center on Chicago Price Theory at the University of Chicago, where this research was conducted, and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. † Email: [email protected]. Address: George Mason University, Department of Economics, MS 3G4, Fairfax, VA 22030. ‡ Email: [email protected]. Address: Santa Clara Law, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95053. 1 1 Introduction Every economist knows theft is socially inefficient. From society’s perspective resources thieves use to transfer others’ property to themselves, and resources others use to prevent thieves from stealing their property, are wasted. The social costs of violent theft—of plunder—are larger still.
    [Show full text]
  • All at Sea: an Accusation of Piracy Against William Herle in 1565
    All at Sea: An Accusation of Piracy Against William Herle in 1565 Robyn Adams I com frelye in uppon your honors assurance, to justeffye my doings, & to difface my accusers, aswell to acqwite your honor to the Qwenes majestie, being that waye allwayes mi prefferer, as to discharge my pore honestye everye waye. Consydering whatt a reproche it is to th’entretye of the traffyck, yf I justlye might be charged with this. Requireng therfore most humblye to plede my case in lybertye (accordyng to promys) & if I may be justlye towched, I require no favor but extreme deth, for my emprisonment shold be my undoing, where otherwise mi frynds mene well unto me, but I know your honors word to be suffycyent to me, & hitherto to hathe byn allwayes invyolate.1 Elizabethan privateering is typically associated with the notorious figures of Sir Francis Drake, Sir Walter Raleigh, and Sir Martin Frobisher. Endorsed and celebrated by Elizabeth I and her council, the aggressive policy against Spanish shipping contributed to the legend of English sea power at the end 1. William Herle to Sir William Cecil, 3 August 1565, The National Archives, Kew (TNA): Public Record Office (PRO) SP 15/12/76, fol. 221v. © 2012 by Washington & Jefferson College. All rights reserved. 0049-4127/2012/5801-001 TOPIC: THE WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE REVIEW of the sixteenth century, increasing in frequency after the “victory” over the Armada in 1588, and later connected to colonial enterprise. In the middle years of the century, piracy and privateering were also widespread, although on a much smaller scale and mostly restricted to local waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Salem Maritime Activity After 1800
    Contents Page Establishment and Location 3 Historical Background: Early Maritime Significance of Salem . . 3 The Derbys And Their Maritime Pursuits: Founding the Derby Fortune 4 The Derbys during the Revolutionary War. 5 Privateers and Letters-of-Marque 5 The Grand Turk and The Astrea 6 Search for New Trade Routes and Markets. 7 The East India and China Trade . 7 Salem Ships During the Napoleonic Wars. . 11 Salem Maritime Activity After 1800 . . 14 The Salem Custom House and Nathaniel Hawthorne 14 How to Reach The Site 15 Service to the Public 15 Richard Derby, 1712-83. Reproduced from a portrait by Henry Sargent. Courtesy of the Essex Institute THE COVER The Grand Turk, a ship of 300 tons, was a Revolu- tionary privateer and the first American merchant- The National Park System, of which Salem man to reach the Cape of Good Hope. It was Maritime National Historic Site is a unit, is built for Elias Hasket Derby during the winter of 1780-81, and was one of the most famous vessels dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, ever to sail from Salem. This photographic illus- and historic heritage of the United States for tration is a reproduction of a painting made by a the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Chinese artist at Canton in 1786 on a punchbowl presented to the captain of the ship on his departure for Salem. The original punchbowl is in the Peabody Museum of Salem. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE jj Salem Maritime National Historic Site Establishment and Location From the start, the English colonists of Salem turned to the sea for a livelihood.
    [Show full text]
  • Salem Maritime
    Salem Maritime National Historie Site, Massachusetts of the world. Salem's 150 privateering vessels The task of carrying the war to the British mer­ Throughout the war, sailors preferred to serve E would not remain idle in years to come. chant marine fell to America's merchant sea­ aboard privateers because their percentage of Independence meant losing foreign markets; men, sailing in private ships, the State navies, prize money—as well as their wages—were E Great Britain naturally closed her ports—and and the Continental Navy. At the beginning of higher than on Navy ships: privateers paid sea­ Elias Hasket Derby, 47 years old and well on those of her West Indian and other colonies—to 1776, the Continental Navy had only four ships men $12 to $16 per month, and one 14-year-old his way to becoming America's first millionaire, American vessels. So Salem shipowners, seek­ to put to sea, and was far too small to damage cabin boy's share of a month's prizes was said thrust the brass telescope through the second- ing new markets, sent vessels flying their house the Royal Navy. Congress, therefore, issued to total $700 in cash, a ton of sugar, 35 gallons story window of his counting house, looked past flags to the far corners of the world. They letters of marque and reprisal to individuals of rum, and 20 pounds each of cotton, ginger, the bustle and the ships berthed along the manned their ships with venturesome sailors, authorizing privately owned and operated ves­ logwood and allspice.
    [Show full text]
  • Privateers and Privateering
    ^lOSANCElfj^. £^OKALIFOfttj, .^OFCALIFO/?^ >r & <TJ1J3NV-SQV^ ^AINfHWV ^l-UBRARY-Qc <$UIBRARY0^ ,\V\E-UNIVERS/a vvlOSANCElfj> %HI1V3-J0^ ^fOJIlVOJO^ "%3A!M-3t^ ^OKALIF(%, ^E-UNIVER5//v. ^lOSANCElfj^ e ^AavHan-^ ^fil33NV-S01^ "^AINIHtW ?% ^ios- ^SUIBRARY^ ^•HBRARYQc g ^^ DO ^otainmw^ ^WMITCHO^ ?% v^lOSANCELfj^ ^OFCALIFO/?^ O INA-3WV ^Aavaan-i^ ^Aavaan-3^ \V\EUNIVERto v^lOSANCElfx* ^OJIIVDJO^ <TJ13QNVS0^ %a3AIN03\W' \lifOM^ v^lOSANCElfj^ tW 0= ^ *^ ^ r*\ rllWi R% v^l0S-ANGElfj> S^OFCALIFO% ^OFC * ~r o I l n ^ J? )nvso^ %a3AiNiHt\v y0AavaaiH^ ^Aavaam^ ^ttlBRARYQr ^EUNIVERS/a ^vlOSANCElfx> -< JO^ ^/OJIIVOJO^ <TJ130NV-S01^ "^/WHAINfl-aiW* tAUFO/?^ ^OF-CALIF0% AttE-UNIVERty) vvlOSANCElfjv y0AHvaaiH^ <&to-sov^ %HAINfl-]tf^ osWSMCEl% ^LIBRARYQ^ <SSUIBRARY0/ j^" ^* O _1M_ o )NVS01^ %a]AINrt-3V\V ^lOS-ANGElft* ^OKAIIFO%, ^0F-CAIIF(% %. &-n | O-n %f3AiNfl-3t\v ^AHvaani^ ^Aavaan# <&12DNV-5 [^ ^UIBRARYQ^ AWEUNIVER5-/A ^clOSANCELfj^. ^UIBRAI ^C *3 ^Til3DNVS0# %a3AII«V CAUFO/?^ ^OFCAllFOfy^ ^WEUNIVERI/a ^lOSANCElfj^ O ^f -fc». «-* PRIVATEERS AND PRIVATEERING PRIVATEERS AND PRIVATEERING By COMMANDER E. P. STATHAM, R.N. AUTHOR OF "THE STORY OF THE 'BRITANNIA,'" AND JOINT AUTHOR OF "THE HOUSE OF HOWARD" WITH EIGHT ILLUSTRATIONS New York JAMES POTT & COMPANY 1910 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN OX PREFACE A few words of explanation are necessary as to the pretension and scope of this volume. It does not pretend to be a history of privateering ; the subject is an immense one, teeming with technicalities, legal and nautical ; interesting, indeed, to the student of history, and never comprehensively treated hitherto, as far as the present author is aware, in any single work. The present object is not, however, to provide a work of reference, but rather a collection of true stories of privateering incidents, and heroes of what " " the French term la course ; and as such it is hoped that it will find favour with a large number of readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Privateers in Their Place: the Applicability of the Marque and Reprisal Clause to Undeclared Wars C
    Putting Privateers in Their Place: The Applicability of the Marque and Reprisal Clause to Undeclared Wars C. Kevin Marshailt Few constitutional issues have so consistently held the at- tention of scholars and politicians over the last thirty years as the distribution of war powers between Congress and the Presi- dent. While the Vietnam War and the War Powers Resolution provided the initial sparks,1 Presidents since then have been more than forthcoming in offering new fuel for the war powers debate, particularly President Reagan.2 Not only have presidents carried out acts one could consider "war," such as invading Gre- nada, Panama, or Iraq, but they also have assisted groups seek- ing to topple foreign governments, such as Nicaragua's, often without notifying, much less receiving permission from, Con- gress. These "little wars" and covert actions have ignited yet an- other flame of the post-Vietnam debate.' Several scholars, led by Professors Charles Lofgren and Jules Lobel, have turned to the long-neglected power of Congress to grant letters of marque and reprisal4 to support congressional authority over all military ac- tions short of declared war. t B.A. 1994, Middlebury College; J.D. Candidate 1998, The University of Chicago. I See Peter J. Spiro, Old Wars/New Wars, 37 Wm & Mary L Rev 723, 737 n 31 (1996) (Before Vietnam War, "there was little ... scholarly commentary" on war powers. War was a "turning point" in academic discussion of issue.). 2 See, for example, David Locke Hall, The Reagan Wars: A ConstitutionalPerspective on War Powers and the Presidency 135-269 (Westview 1991) (considering action in Leba- non, invasion of Grenada, bombing of Libya, and escorting of Kuwaiti shipping during the Iran-Iraq war); Gary M.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of the BRITISH HONOURABLE EAST INDIA COMPANY and PIRACY in the INDIAN OCEAN WORLD, CIRCA 1680-1760 John Ridge
    Murray State's Digital Commons Murray State Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2017 TO STAND AGAINST THE COMPANY: A STUDY OF THE BRITISH HONOURABLE EAST INDIA COMPANY AND PIRACY IN THE INDIAN OCEAN WORLD, CIRCA 1680-1760 John Ridge Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/etd Part of the Asian History Commons, European History Commons, Other History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Ridge, John, "TO STAND AGAINST THE COMPANY: A STUDY OF THE BRITISH HONOURABLE EAST INDIA COMPANY AND PIRACY IN THE INDIAN OCEAN WORLD, CIRCA 1680-1760" (2017). Murray State Theses and Dissertations. 21. https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/etd/21 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Murray State's Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Murray State Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Murray State's Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TO STAND AGAINST THE COMPANY: A STUDY OF THE BRITISH HONOURABLE EAST INDIA COMPANY AND PIRACY IN THE INDIAN OCEAN WORLD, CIRCA 1680-1760 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History Murray State University Murray, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of a Master’s Degree in History By John Daniel Ridge iii Abstract This study attempts to explore the multi-faceted challenges and hindrances brought upon the British East India Company by piracy in the Indian Ocean World. European and American pirates in the late-seventeenth and early-eighteenth centuries influenced economic, political, and social factors in the Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]